Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EARNEDVALUE APracticalApproach pp
PMI Belgium
Stephan Vandevoorde, Ing. Director of Programs & Events
stephan.vandevoorde@pmi stephan.vandevoorde@pmi-belgium.be
CONTENT
IntroductiontoEarnedValue ApplyingEarnedValueManagement Experiences
Specialtopic:EarnedSchedule
23/06/2009
EV
WhataboutTimeForecasting?
PMIPracticeStandardforEarnedValueManagement,2005
VARIANCE ANALYSIS ScheduleVariance=SV=EV PV<0=delay>0=ahead SchedulePerformanceIndex=SPI=EV/PV<1=delay>1=ahead TimeEstimateatCompletion=EACt=PD/SPI PD=PlannedDuration
FORECAST
PMBOKGuide,FourthEdition
VARIANCE ANALYSIS ScheduleVariance=SV=EV PV<0=delay>0=ahead S h d l Performance Schedule P f I Index d =SPI=EV/PV<1=d delay l >1=ahead h d Appliedontothecriticalpath ???
FORECAST
23/06/2009
EV
SV SPIRevisited
ScheduleVariance SV=EV PV <0delay =0ontime >0ahead Bydefinitionatendofproject: EV=totalPV(BAC) ThusSV=PV PV=0 Showsperfectperformance!!! Whatifwearelate? SVisespressedinEuros Difficulttounderstand SchedulePerformanceIndex SPI=EV/PV <1delay =1ontime >1ahead Bydefinitionatendofproject: EV=totalPV(BAC) ThusSPI=PV/PV=1 Showsperfectperformance!!! Whatifwearelate? SPIisdimensionless Easiertounderstand
23/06/2009
EV
RealLifeLateProject
Sep/03 0 100 Nov/03 Jan/04 Mar/04 May/04 Jul/04
SV
SPI
0.80 0.75 0 5 0.70 23/06/2009 EV 5
AnotherMethod
PMI Practice Standard for Earned Value Management Box 3-1:
Time-Based Schedule Measures An Emerging EVM Practice
Provides foundation for further development of and research intended to result in Earned Schedule acceptance as a valid extension to EV
23/06/2009 EV 6
EarnedSchedule
Created by Walt Lipke, Schedule is Different, The Measurable News, Summer 2003
PV
SV EV
time AD ES SV(t) PD
23/06/2009
EV
EarnedSchedule
VARIANCE ANALYSIS ScheduleVarianceTime=SV(t)=ES AD AD=actualduration <0=delay0>ontime0=ahead Expressedintimeunits SchedulePerformanceIndexTime=SPI(t)=ES/AD <1=delay1=ontime>1=ahead FORECAST TimeEstimateatCompletion=EACt=PD/SPI(t) ToCompletePerformanceIndexTime TSPI(t)=(PD ES)/(PD AD)iftarget=PD TSPI(t)=(PD ES)/(LRD AD)iftargetisLatestRevisedDuration
ASSESS REALISM
23/06/2009
EV
RealLifeLateProject
0 0.000 100 0.500
1.000 200 1.500 300 2 000 2.000 400 2.500 500 SV SV(t)
3.000
600
3.500
23/06/2009
EV
RealLifeLateProject
1.000 0 950 0.950 0.900 0 850 0.850 0.800 0 750 0.750 0.700 0.650 0.600 SPI(t) SPI
23/06/2009
EV
10
RealLifeLateProject
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
AD ES PD PD/SPI / PD/SPI(t)
23/06/2009
EV
11
RealLifeLateProject
1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 SPI(t) TCSPI(t) TCSPI(t) 11 TCSPI(t) 12
23/06/2009
EV
12
ESResearch
Emperical evidence:
Vandevoorde St., Vanhoucke M., International Journal of Project Management, May 2006 A Comparison p of different p project j duration forecasting g methods using g earned value metrics
State of the Art Report on Forecasting Duration Methods Earned Schedule provide schedule metrics which behave correctly during the whole project life Earned Schedule forecasting is more reliable, and usefull to sanity check schedule expectations
23/06/2009
EV
13
ESResearch
Academical Research:
Funded by PMI Belgium & FWO, Vlaanderen
Vanhoucke M., Vandevoorde St., Journal of the Operational Research Society, October 2007 A simulation and evaluation of earned value metrics to forecast the project duration
IPMA Research Award 22nd World Congress Rome Earned Schedule is the better performer for forecasting
23/06/2009 EV 14
ESResearch
23/06/2009
EV
15
ESResearch
23/06/2009
EV
16
Information
A Belgian Research Effort
23/06/2009
EV
17