Power Quality Research Lab., I-7, Wyb.

Wyspiaoskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocaw, Poland phone +48713202626, fax +48713202006, email: zbigniew.leonowicz@pwr.wroc.pl

POWER QUALITY REPORT

Facility: XXX

Start Monitoring: XX Stop Monitoring: XX Received Data: XX Report Generated: XX Survey Type: Equipment Installed and Operating Project Manager: Zbigniew Leonowicz, PhD Eng. Collaborators: XXX

SUMMARY OF REPORT: Power quality assessment showed no significant issues. Voltages over upper limit were detected mainly in L2 of the 110 kV distribution network.

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Needs Follow-Up

Category

Summary Analysis GENERATOR (10,5 kV)

Harmonic current factor Symmetrical components of currents Ratio of the negativesequence component of current to the rated current Voltage and frequency limits during operation Voltage dependence of the generator frequency Events

Values within the limits Values within the limits Values within the limits

Values within the limits Values within the limits No events recorded DISTRIBUTION NETWORK (110 kV)

Power frequency assessment Long-term flicker severity Unbalance Harmonics THD Voltage Events

Values within the limits Values within the limits Values within the limits Values within the limits Values within the limits Values within the limits Overvoltages, Voltage over RMS upper limit mainly in L2, see page 25.

Page 2

Not Applicable

Acceptable

Problem

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

CONTENT

1.

MEASUREMENTS RELATED TO AC GENERATOR ....................................................................................... 4 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. 1.5. 1.6. 1.7. 1.8. MEASURING EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................................... 4 AC GENERATOR PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................ 4 HARMONIC CURRENT FACTOR (HCF) ........................................................................................................ 8 SYMMETRICAL COMPONENTS OF CURRENTS ............................................................................................... 9 RATIO OF THE NEGATIVE-SEQUENCE COMPONENT OF CURRENT TO THE RATED CURRENT (I2/IN) ............................. 11 VOLTAGE AND FREQUENCY VARIATIONS DURING OPERATION......................................................................... 12 VOLTAGE DEPENDENCE OF THE GENERATOR FREQUENCY .............................................................................. 15 SUMMARY OF THE REPORT ................................................................................................................... 15

2.

MEASUREMENTS RELATED TO 110 KV DISTRIBUTION NETWORK .......................................................... 17 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 2.5. 2.6. 2.7. 2.8. MEASURING EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................... 17 POWER FREQUENCY ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................... 17 LONG TERM FLICKER SEVERITY ............................................................................................................... 19 VOLTAGE UNBALANCE ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................... 20 HARMONICS ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................... 21 SUPPLY VOLTAGE VARIATION ................................................................................................................ 24 EVENTS ........................................................................................................................................... 25 SUMMARY OF THE REPORT ................................................................................................................... 26

3.

LITERATURE........................................................................................................................................... 26

Page 3

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

1. Measurements related to AC generator

In this chapter, the power quality (PQ) report contains assessment of set of PQ parameters recorded indirectly at the AC generator (10,5 kV). Recorded values were compared with recommended values. Power quality report includes assessment of : harmonic current factor (HCF) [4] system of currents symmetrical components [4] ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated current [4] voltage and frequency variations during operation [4] voltage dependence of the generator frequency [5] recorded power quality events and transients

Measurements were done on the voltage and current transformers terminals in the XXX Localization of the power quality recorder in the generator circuitry presents XX

1.1. Measuring equipment

Fluke 1760, Three-Phase Power Quality Recorder Topas, Serial No. Y760588, GPS time synchronization, Class-A compliance.

1.2. AC Generator Parameters

Manufacturer: XXX Type: XXX Air cooled turbo generator, apparent power 76 MVA, rated voltage 10,5 kV, current 4205 A, power factor 0,85, speed 3000 rpm.

The generator parameters during 1 week assessment time are shown in Table 1-1:

Page 4

Power Quality Report

Table 1-1. Generator parameters during the assessment period

2010-12-27

Values Parameter min Active power P [MW] Reactive power Q [MVAr] Apparent Power S [MVA] cos tan Power factor PF 24,515 2,604 24,752 0,934 0,045 0,964 Percentile 95% 62,975 18,361 64,802 0,994 0,110 0,993 max 64,291 22,961 66,782 0,999 0,382 0,998

PF is defined as: PF=(P/|S|)(Qh/|Qh|)

Fig. 1.1. Visualization of the generators active power in 1 week. (yellow line sum of three phase quantities)

Page 5

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Fig. 1.2. Visualization of the generators reactive power in 1 week.

Fig. 1.3. Visualization of the generators apparent power in 1 week.

Page 6

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Fig. 1.4. Visualization of the generators power factor (cos) in 1 week.

Fig. 1.5. Visualization of the generators power factor (PF=(P/|S|)*(Qh/|Qh|)) in 1 week.

Page 7

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Fig. 1.6. Localization of the power quality measurements in the generator circuitry.

1.3. Harmonic current factor (HCF)

Three-phase a.c. generators shall be suitable for supplying circuits which, when supplied by a system of balanced and sinusoidal voltages result in currents not exceeding a harmonic current factor (HCF) of 5% [4]. The HCF shall be computed by using the following formula:

where in is the ratio of the harmonic current In to the rated current IN; n is the order of harmonic; k = 13. Harmonic components are shown in Fig. 1.7.

Table 1-2. Assessment of the HCF HCF assessment min Percentile 95% max HCF [%] 1,01 1,69 1,83

During 100% of the assessment period the maximum HCF values are within the range of 1,01% 1,83%, all below the limit of 5%.

Page 8

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Fig. 1.7. Visualization of the currents harmonics averaged over 1 week. (in all figures the plots of L1 are blue, L2-red, L3-green)

1.4.Symmetrical components of currents

Three-phase a.c. generators shall be suitable for supplying circuits which, when supplied by a system of balanced and sinusoidal voltages result in a system of currents where neither the negative-sequence component nor the zero-sequence component exceed 5% of the positive-sequence component [4]. Currents symmetrical components are shown in Fig. 1.8 and 1.9.

Page 9

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Fig. 1.8. Visualization of currents Zero to Positive sequence ratio.

Fig. 1.9. Visualization of currents Negative to Positive sequence ratio.

Page 10

Power Quality Report

Table 1-3. Assessment of the negative and zero-sequence components Components ratio Components ratio assessment min Zero/Pos Neg/Pos 0,43 0,55 [%] Percentile 95% 0,50 1,11 max 0,50 2,35

2010-12-27

During 100% of the assessment period measured values hold in range from 0,43% to 0,50% for zero sequence component and from 0,55% to 2,35% for negative sequence component, all below the limit of 5%.

1.5.Ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated current (I2/IN)

Three-phase synchronous machines shall be capable of operating continuously on an unbalanced system in such a way that, with none of the phase currents exceeding the rated current, the ratio of the negative-sequence component of maximum current for continuous operation (I2) to the rated current (IN) does not exceed the value of 8% for a.c. generators with direct cooled (inner cooled) rotor windings [4].

Table 1-4. Assessment of the I2/IN I2/IN assessment I2/IN I2/IN I2/IN min Percentile 95% max I2/IN [%] 0,008 0,152 0,356

Page 11

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Fig. 1.10. Visualization of currents I2/IN ratio.

Figure 1.10 and Table 1-4 contains statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case requirements for I2/IN are fulfilled. The recorded r.m.s. values hold in range from 0,008% to 0,356%.

1.6. Voltage and frequency variations during operation

For a.c. machines rated for use on a power supply of fixed frequency supplied from an a.c. generator (whether local or via a supply network), combinations of voltage variation and frequency variation are classified as being either zone A or zone B, in accordance with Figure 1.11 for generators and synchronous condensers. A machine shall be capable of performing its primary function, continuously within zone A, but need not comply fully with its performance at rated voltage and frequency [4].

Page 12

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Fig. 1.11. Voltage and frequency limits for generators with plotted limit range of recorded values (red rectangle).

Table 1-5. Assessment of voltage and frequency limits Voltage and frequency limits min
U,

U [p.u.] 0,9997 1,0255 1,0257

f [p.u.] 0,9981 1,0010 1,0016

Percentile 95% max

Page 13

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Fig. 1.12. Visualization of voltage variation in 1 week.

Fig. 1.13. Visualization of frequency variation in 1 week.

Page 14

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Visualization of the recorded data in Figures 1.12 and 1.1.3 and Table 1-5 contain statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case requirements for voltage and frequency limits are fulfilled.

1.7. Voltage dependence of the generator frequency

The generating unit should maintain the following relationship between the frequency of the generator and voltage [5] for where f is the change of frequency in p.u. and Ug is the change of generator voltage corresponding to the change of frequency, in p.u.

Table 1-6. Assessment of voltage dependence on generator frequency

Ug/f
[p.u.]

Ug Ug/f10min f
max

1,64910-5 8,39910-4 0,0196

For measured data, the maximum of numerical approximate gradient showed the point where the change of frequency was the highest (22.11.2010 06:00:00), see Table 1-6. Corresponding change of voltage was determined and the ratio Ug/f computed at this time point [2]. The requirements are fulfilled.

1.8.Summary of the report

Presented in previous section assessment of crucial power quality parameters indicates that: in case of harmonic current factor (HCF), requirements are fulfilled in case of system of currents symmetrical components, requirements are fulfilled in case of the ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated current , requirements are fulfilled in case of voltage and frequency variations during operation , requirements are fulfilled in case of voltage dependence of the generator frequency, requirements are fulfilled

Page 15

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

During the assessment period no events were detected (with exception to one generator disconnection from the grid due to causes not relevant to power quality assessment).

Page 16

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

2. Measurements related to 110 kV distribution network

In this chapter, the power quality (PQ) report contains assessment of set of PQ parameters recorded indirectly at power line of the distribution network (110 kV). Recorded values were compared with recommended values. Power quality report includes assessment of : power frequency long term flicker severity voltage unbalance harmonics recorded power quality events and transients

2.1.Measuring equipment
Fluke 1760, Three-Phase Power Quality Recorder Topas, Serial No. UO13379, GPS time synchronization, Class-A compliance. Measurements were done on the voltage and current transformers terminals of transmission line 1 in XXX.

Localization of the power quality recorder in the distribution network of the 110 kV line No. 1 presents XX
Fig. 2.1. Localization of the power quality measurements in 110 kV distribution network.

2.2. Power frequency assessment

The standards [3] and [4] indicate that the nominal frequency of the supply voltage shall be 50 Hz. Under normal operating conditions the mean value of the fundamental frequency measured over 10 s shall be within a range of: for systems with synchronous connection to an interconnected system with the voltage below 220 kV:

Page 17

Power Quality Report 50 Hz 1 % (i.e. 49,5 Hz... 50,5 Hz) during 99 ,5 % of a week; 50 Hz + 4 % / - 6 % (i.e. 47 Hz... 52 Hz) during 100 % of the week;

2010-12-27

Fig. 2.2. Visualization of power frequency variation.

Table 2-1. Assessment of power frequency variation Frequency assessment f10s f10s f10s min Percentile 99,5% max f [Hz] 49,905 50,009 50,109

Visualization of the recorded set of frequency values is shown in Fig. 2.2. Figure 2.2 and Table 1-2 contains the statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case requirements for frequency standards are fulfilled. During 100% of the assessment period frequency values hold in range from 49,905 to 50,109 Hz.

Page 18

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

2.3.Long term flicker severity

Fig. 2.3. Visualization of long-term flicker severity Table 2-2. Assessment of long-term flicker severity Flicker assessment min Plt2h Percentile 95% max L1 [-] 0,15 0,73 0,75 L2 [-] 0,16 0,65 0,66 L3 [-] 0,15 0,63 0,64

Visualization of the recorded set of long-term flicker coefficient values is shown in Fig 2.3. The standards indicate that under normal operating conditions, in any period of one week the long term flicker severity caused by voltage fluctuation should be Plt 0,8 for 95 % of the time [5]. Table 2-2 contains the statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case requirements for flicker severity are fulfilled. 95% of the recorded long-term flicker values hold in range from 0,15 to 0,75. Moreover 100% of the recorded values follows by the standard expectation.

Page 19

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

2.4. Voltage unbalance assessment

Fig. 2.4. Visualization of the voltage unbalance variation Table 2-3. Assessment of unbalance variation Unbalance assessment min Neg/Pos10min Percentile 95% max Neg/Pos [%] 0,15 0,26 0,29

Visualization of the recorded set of unbalance values is shown in Fig. 2.4. The standard [4] indicates that under normal operating conditions, during each period of one week, 95 % of the 10 min mean r.m.s. values of the negative phase sequence component (fundamental) of the supply voltage shall be within the range 0 % to 1 % of the positive phase sequence component (fundamental). Table 2-3 contains statistical parameters which confirm that in the investigated case requirements for unbalance standards are fulfilled. The recorded unbalance coefficient hold in range from 0,15% to 0,29%.(with 95% values not greater than 0,26%).

Page 20

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

2.5.Harmonics assessment
Table 2-4. Assessment of harmonic variations

Harmonic assessment Percentile95% Order Nr.

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26* 27* 28* 29* 30* 31*

Max L3 [%]
0,06 0,15 0,02 0,71 0,02 0,39 0,03 0,04 0,03 0,15 0,02 0,19 0,02 0,02 0,01 0,12 0,02 0,06 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,08 0,01 0,07 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 L1 L2

Limits [%]
1,50 2,00 1,00 2,00 0,50 2,00 0,50 1,00 0,50 1,50 0,50 1,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,00 0,50 1,00 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,70 0,50 0,70 0,68 0,66 0,65 0,63 0,62 0,60

L1

L2

L3 [%]
0,08 0,19 0,04 0,95 0,03 0,50 0,05 0,07 0,07 0,19 0,02 0,28 0,03 0,03 0,02 0,15 0,03 0,08 0,03 0,03 0,02 0,11 0,02 0,13 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02

[%]
0,06 0,26 0,03 0,74 0,02 0,41 0,03 0,04 0,03 0,14 0,02 0,19 0,02 0,02 0,01 0,10 0,01 0,07 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,07 0,01 0,07 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02

[%]
0,06 0,30 0,02 0,66 0,02 0,39 0,02 0,04 0,03 0,16 0,02 0,19 0,02 0,02 0,01 0,10 0,01 0,06 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,08 0,01 0,06 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02

[%]
0,09 0,28 0,04 0,90 0,04 0,53 0,05 0,07 0,07 0,18 0,02 0,27 0,03 0,03 0,02 0,13 0,02 0,09 0,02 0,03 0,02 0,11 0,02 0,13 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02

[%]
0,09 0,33 0,03 0,89 0,03 0,48 0,05 0,07 0,06 0,19 0,02 0,28 0,03 0,03 0,02 0,12 0,03 0,10 0,03 0,03 0,02 0,14 0,03 0,11 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02

Page 21

Power Quality Report

0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,03 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,03 0,01 0,03 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02

2010-12-27
0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,03 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,03 0,01 0,03 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,01

32* 33* 34* 35* 36* 37* 38* 39* 40* 41* 42* 43* 44* 45* 46* 47* 48* 49*

0,59 0,58 0,57 0,56 0,55 0,54 0,53 0,52 0,51 0,50 0,50 0,49 0,48 0,48 0,47 0,47 0,46 0,46

0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 50* 0,45 *For harmonics higher than 25th the formula for the harmonic limit is 0,2+0,5(25/h) [%] [5].

Fig, 2.5. Visualization of the voltages harmonic spectrum averaged in 1 week.

Page 22

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

Table 2-4 contains limits for particular harmonics defined in [5] and statistical parameters of recorded data. Distribution of the harmonics is also visible in Fig, 2.5. Performed measurements has detected no values over the limit.

Fig, 2.6. Visualization of THDV variation Table 2-5. Assessment of THDV variation THDV assessment min THDV
10min

THDVL1 [%] 0,37 0,88 0,99

THDVL2 [%] 0,38 0,81 0,99

THDVL3 [%] 0,29 0,83 1,02

Percentile 95% max

Visualization of the recorded set of total harmonics distortion in voltage is shown in Fig. 2-6, [5] indicates THD of the supply voltage (including all harmonics up to the order 40) shall be less than or equal to 3 %. Table 2-5 contains the statistical parameters of THDV which confirmed that in the investigated case requirements are fulfilled, 95% of the recorded THDV coefficient hold in

Page 23

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

range from 0,83% to 0,88%, Moreover 100% of the recorded values follow by the standard expectation.

2.6. Supply voltage variation

Fig. 2.7. Visualization of supply voltage variation.

Table 2-6. Assessment of supply voltage variation Voltage assesment min U10min Percentile 95% max VL1 [V] 67609,00 69407,25 69677,00 VL2 [V] 67837,00 69648,00 69948,00 VL3 [V] 67683,00 69441,50 69698,00

Visualization of the recorded set of supply voltage values is shown in Fig, 2.7. The [5] indicates that under normal operating conditions: - during each period of one week 95 % of the 10 min mean r.m.s. values of the supply voltage shall be within the range of Un 10 %, i.e. in the range 57157,68 69859,38 V. Table 2-6 contains statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case requirements for r.m.s. supply voltage standards are fulfilled, 95% of the recorded r.m.s., Page 24

Power Quality Report

2010-12-27

values hold in range from 69407,25 V to 69648,00 V Moreover 100% of the recorded values follows by standard expectation, i.e. are within the range of 50806,82 V 76210,23 V.

2.7.Events
During the assessment period the following events were detected:
Overvoltages Designation Number Maximum value [V] Maximum duration L1 1 69879 4h 56m 26s L2 4 70136 8h 51m 14s L3 1 69900 6h 9m 33s L123-N 4 70136 8h 51m 14s

Details of recorded events Event Location Detection Date & Time 21.11.2010 00:45:43,71 21.11.2010 00:45:43,71 21.11.2010 00:51:22,33 21.11.2010 03:05:31,08 21.11.2010 04:18:47,43 21.11.2010 05:00:50,17 22.11.2010 00:47:40,70 22.11.2010 00:47:40,70 22.11.2010 00:53:02,94 22.11.2010 08:33:09,62 22.11.2010 08:33:09,62 23.11.2010 13:20:18,80 23.11.2010 18:55:21,73 24.11.2010 01:43:38,14 24.11.2010 01:43:38,14 24.11.2010 09:15:00,91 24.11.2010 14:27:37,11 24.11.2010 15:38:24,90 25.11.2010 02:05:16,99 Duration Value

Voltage Swells Voltage Swells Voltage Swells Voltage Swells Voltage Swells Voltage Swells Voltage Swells 3-ph Voltage Swells 3-ph Voltage Swells 3-ph Voltage Swells 3-ph RMS Upper Limit RMS Upper Limit RMS Upper Limit RMS Upper Limit RMS Upper Limit h06 Harmonics h06 Harmonics h06 Harmonics h06 Harmonics

V L3 V L1 V L2 V L2 V L2 V L2 V L123-N V L123-N V L123-N V L123-N V L3 V L2 V L2 V L2 V L2 V L2 V L1 V L1 V L1

6h 9m 33s 4h 56m 26s 8h 51m 14s 5h 16m 0s 4h 8m 3s 4h 5m 8s 8h 51m 14s 5h 16m 0s 4h 8m 3s 4h 5m 8s 4h 44m 5s 10h 19m 45s 6h 11m 40s 4h 33m 42s 4h 23m 59s 200,06ms 200,05ms 199,88ms 999,77ms

6,99e+04 [V] 6,988e+04 [V] 7,014e+04 [V] 7,003e+04 [V] 6,999e+04 [V] 6,991e+04 [V] 7,014e+04 [V] 7,003e+04 [V] 6,999e+04 [V] 6,991e+04 [V] 6,987e+04 [V] 7,012e+04 [V] 7,001e+04 [V] 6,996e+04 [V] 6,989e+04 [V] 0,5343 [%] 0,5235 [%] 0,501 [%] 0,5519 [%]

Page 25

Power Quality Report

h06 Harmonics h06 Harmonics h06 Harmonics h06 Harmonics h12 Harmonics V L1 V L1 V L1 V L3 V L1 25.11.2010 02:05:16,99 25.11.2010 02:05:19,01 25.11.2010 05:29:01,27 25.11.2010 07:55:14,98 25.11.2010 12:44:23,45 199,99ms 1,0002s 200,05ms 200,11ms 199,96ms

2010-12-27
0,5788 [%] 0,5491 [%] 0,5054 [%] 0,5294 [%] 0,7392 [%]

2.8.Summary of the report

Presented in previous section assessment of crucial power quality parameters indicates that: in case of power frequency, requirements are fulfilled in case of voltage supply, requirements are fulfilled in case of flicker severity, requirements are fulfilled in case of voltage unbalance, requirements are fulfilled in case of THD of the supply voltage, requirements are fulfilled in case of harmonics, requirements are fulfilled Multiple events were detected during the recording time. Closer follow-up require the overvoltages.

3. Literature
[1] IEC 61000-4-30:2008, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC): Testing and measurement techniques -Power quality measurement method [2] Bollen M,H,J, Irene Yu-Hua Gu, Signal Processing of Power Quality Disturbances, 2006 The Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers, Inc [3] EN 50160: Voltage characteristics of electricity supplied by public distribution networks [4] IEC 60034-1: Rotating electrical machines: 7 Electrical operating conditions [5] Regulations of the operation and exploitation of the distribution network

Page 26