.

forklift truck
.

(slab
on
grade).
. .
. .Partitions .
Mezzanine . .(Stationary live load) .
forklift truck
. .
.
forklift truck . 5 . 120
(US Army Corp of Engineer) COE
forklift truck
forklift truck .
(Max. axle load) .Catalog
. 87-94% ..
..

. forklift truck .
COE 1
1 .. forklift truck [5]
Forklift Trucks
Forklift Trucks
Maximum Load
Category
Max. Axle Load, kips
Capacity, kips
I
5 to 10
2 to 4
II
10 to 15
4 to 6
III
15 to 25
6 to 10
IV
25 to 36
10 to 16
V
36 to 43
16 to 20
VI
43 to120
20 to 52

Corps of Engineer (COE) Method

.

COE
. Westergaard (edge
stress) . (impact factor)
25 (dowel bar)
25
(temperature gradients)
safety factor 2
(plain concrete)
(Modulus of Rupture)
(Flexural strength)
ASTM C78 (Flexural
Strength of Concrete Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading)
28 6x 6
18 2 3

7.5 f c (ACI 318-05) f c ( psi)

15. 30. 28
(Design Index)
COE (Design Index) 1-10
Design Index .
. 2025 COE
(pneumatic-tired vehicles) . 3 Group
Group 1 (panel and pickup trucks)
Group 2 2 (two-axle trucks)
Group 3 3, 4 5 (three-, four-, and five-axle trucks)
Design Index (traffic intensity)(traffic
compositions) Group Class Category 2

 3 Class Category Design Index

4
2 (Class)
Road Class
Number of Vehicles Per Days
A
.
10,000
B
C
D
E
F

.
.
.
.
.

8,400-10,000
6,300-8,400
2,100-6,300
210-2,100
70-210

3 Category
Traffic
Category
Category
Category
Category
Category
Category

Percentage of total traffic for vehicle groups

I
II
III
IV
IVA

Group 1
99%
90%
84%
65%
Any amount

Group 2
1%
10%
15%
25%
> 25%

Group 3

1%
10%
> 10%

4 Design Index .
Class
A
B
C
D
E
F

Category
I
2
2
2
1
1
1

Category
II
3
2
2
2
2
1

Category
III
4
4
4
3
3
2

Category
IV
5
5
5
4
4
3

Category
IVA
6
6
6
5
5
4

. forklift truck Design Index

1) forklift truck . 5 .
(Stationary live load) 400 / forklift truck .
Group 2 1 1 Design Index
Class Category
2 3 Design Index 4
2) forklift truck . 5-10 forklift truck .
Group 3 1 1 Design Index
Class Category
2 3 Design Index
4
3) forklift truck .10 25 Class V
VI . forklift truck
Design Index 5
5 Design Index forklift truck .10 25
Forklift Truck
Axle Load
(Pounds)
10,001-15,000
15,001-25,000
Over 25,000

Traffic
Category

500

Design Index
Number of Vehicles per Day (or Week as indicated)
200 100 40
10
4
1 1 Per Week
6

--

VI
10
9
8
7
6
6
5
5
....Use Design Chart in figure 2 ...

Note :If number any wheeled vehicles is between values, round up to the next higher number.
. load combinations forklift truck
Traffic category .
Full-scale experiment .
(load repetition) . 10%
load repetition 3-4

 6 Design Index
. forklift truck load combinations
6 Design Index forklift truck [5]
Maximum Operations
Per Day Over 25 Years
50

Load

Design Index

10-kip axle-load forklift truck

250
10

10-kip axle-load forklift truck

15-kip axle-load forklift truck

250
100

10-kip axle-load forklift truck

15-kip axle-load forklift truck

250
5

15-kip axle-load forklift truck

25-kip axle-load forklift truck

Design Charts

COE ( Design Chart)

Design Chart
4000 ksi (Poissons ratio) 0.20
Design Chart (Flexural
strength)( psi) , Modulus of subgrade reaction (k,
pci) (Design Index) factor of safety
Design Chart
1 Design Chart .
forklift truck . 25 load combinations
Group 1, 2 3
Design Chart k
Design Index
1

 . Design Index = 7
= 650 psi k = 200 pci 6.5

1 Design Chart forklift truck . 25 [5]

2 Design Chart .
forklift truck . 25-120 . forklift truck
25 Design Index
.(trucks, cars, buses, and small forklifts)
.
Design Chart
k .

2
forklift truck . 75 100,000
= 745 psi k = 100 pci
10.1

 2 Design Chart forklift truck . 25 120 [5]

1)
(drying shrinkage) (subgrade drag)
(w/c ratio)

2) COE (Tranverse
contraction joint) 7
(slab reinforced for shrinkage and temperature only)


subgrade drag equation
7 (Tranverse contraction joint)
Slab Thickness
Joint Spacing
in.
ft.
4-6
Up to 12.5
6-9
12.5 15.0
9 - 12
15.0 - 20.0
>12
20.0 - 25.0
3) COE contraction joint

L =

L
h
fs
S

=
=
=
=

0.00047 hr ( f s S )

75 ft.

(ft.)
(in.)
(psi)
(%)

. forklift truck COE

PCA[3] COE
.
Design Chart factor of safety
PCA


1.
, , , 3, 2546.
2.
Ringo, B.C. and Anderson, R.B., Designing Floor Slab on Grade, The Aberdeen Group, 1992
3.
ACI Committee360,Design of Slab on Grade (ACI 360R-92), American Concrete Institute, Detroit,
Michigan,1997
4.
American Society for Testing and Materials, Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with
Third-Point Loading (ASTM C78-84), West Conchohocken, PA, 2000
5.
Department of the Army and the Air Force,Concrete Floor Slabs on Grade Subjected to Heavy Loads,
TM5-809-12/AFM88-3 Chap.15, Aug1987
6.
Department of the Army and the Air Force, General Provisions and Geometric Design for Roads,
Streets, Walks, and Open Storage Areas, TM5-822-2/AFM88-7 Chap.5, Jul 87
7.
Department of the Army and the Air Force, Pavement Design for Roads, Streets, Walks, and Open
Storage Areas, TM5-822-5/AFM88-7 Chap.1, Jun1992