Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Persuasive Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Eric Browne
    13 views2 pages
    This document is a template for evaluating a persuasive speech. It includes sections to rate the introduction, organization, content, conclusion, and delivery of the speech. The introduction section asks the evaluator to assess whether the speaker included an engaging opener, relevance, credibility, clear argument, and preview of main points. The organization section rates how easy the speech was to follow. The content section evaluates the strength of claims, evidence used, and how ethos, logos, and pathos were created. The conclusion section looks at if the speaker had a clear call to action, reviewed main points, and provided closure. Delivery is rated on eye contact, body language, vocal ability, and connecting with the audience. The evaluator also notes what the

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a template for evaluating a persuasive speech. It includes sections to rate the introduction, organization, content, conclusion, and delivery of the speech. The introduction section asks the evaluator to assess whether the speaker included an engaging opener, relevance, credibility, clear argument, and preview of main points. The organization section rates how easy the speech was to follow. The content section evaluates the strength of claims, evidence used, and how ethos, logos, and pathos were created. The conclusion section looks at if the speaker had a clear call to action, reviewed main points, and provided closure. Delivery is rated on eye contact, body language, vocal ability, and connecting with the audience. The evaluator also notes what the

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    Persuasive Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Eric Browne
    This document is a template for evaluating a persuasive speech. It includes sections to rate the introduction, organization, content, conclusion, and delivery of the speech. The introduction section asks the evaluator to assess whether the speaker included an engaging opener, relevance, credibility, clear argument, and preview of main points. The organization section rates how easy the speech was to follow. The content section evaluates the strength of claims, evidence used, and how ethos, logos, and pathos were created. The conclusion section looks at if the speaker had a clear call to action, reviewed main points, and provided closure. Delivery is rated on eye contact, body language, vocal ability, and connecting with the audience. The evaluator also notes what the

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Persuasive Peer Evaluation

    Speakers Name: ________________________________________________________________ Topic: ________________________________________________________________________

    Claim. What is the speakers thesis? Introduction. How developed was the introduction? How effectively did the speaker include
    each of the intro parts? Did they have (1) an engaging opener, (2) provide relevance for the audience, (3) establish credibility, (4) offer a clear argument, and (5) preview their main points? 5 well developed 4 3 2 1 not developed

    Organization. How organized is the speaker? In other words, was s/he easy to follow? Did
    s/he transition effectively? Circle one. 5 extremely organized 4 3 2 1 difficult to follow

    Content. How effective was the speaker at convincing you of their claims?
    5 strong claims and ideas 4 3 2 1 weak claims and ideas

    How well did they support their premises and main ideas (evidence/facts-stats-opinion, illustrations, examples, etc.)? 5 very supported 4 3 2 1 undetectable/unsure

    How did the speaker create: 1. Ethos? 2. Logos? 3. Pathos?

    Peer Evaluator:

    Conclusion. How well did the speaker close out the speech? Did s/he (1) have a clear call to
    action, (2) review their main points, and (3) provide a sense of closure? 5 well developed 4 3 2 1 not developed

    Delivery. How effective was the speakers delivery?


    Excellent Eye Contact Body Movement/Gesture Delivery/Vocally Interesting Ability to connect material with the audience 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 Poor 1 1 1 1

    BEST. What do you think the speaker was most effective at accomplishing?

    NEED TO IMPROVE. What suggestions for improvement/advice would you offer to make
    this speaker better?

    OVERALL. How effective was the speaker at achieving their goal?


    5 extremely effective 4 3 2 1 not effective

    You might also like