You are on page 1of 2

Oral presentations Criteria

Introduction of topic

Below expected level


Topic introduced.

At expected level
Topic introduced clearly, and purpose of talk was made clear. Good understanding of topic shown. inks and connections between ideas made clear. Information was relevant and e!pressed in own words. Points were developed with sufficient and appropriate details. "n interesting approach taken to topic. Speaker used techni$ues such as visual aids and props, anecdote, surprising facts, direct audience participation.

Above expected level


Topic introduced clearly and in an interesting way. Purpose of talk was made clear. Outline of points was given. " very good understanding of the topic shown. inks and connections between ideas made clear. Information was relevant and well e!pressed in own words. Points were well#organised and developed with sufficient and appropriate details. Speaker monitored audience and adapts presentation accordingly. "n interesting or original approach taken to the topic. Speaker used techni$ues such as visual aids and props, anecdote, humour, surprising facts, direct audience participation. The presentation content, structure and delivery were closely tailored to the audience and to the intended purpose of informing, interesting or persuading. Presenter spoke clearly and at a good pace to ensure audience comprehension. %elivery was fluent and e!pressive.

Development of topic

Some understanding of topic shown. Some links and connections made between ideas. Points are usually developed with minimum detail. Information is usually relevant.

Some eye contact was made.

Ability to engage and were minimal, or mainly ineffective. involve audience

Techni$ues used to engage audience

Suitability of presentation for purpose and audience Voice: clarity, pace, fluency

"ttempts were made to tailor the presentation content to the intended purpose of informing, interesting or persuading. Presenter occasionally spoke clearly and at a good pace.

The presentation content and structure was tailored to the audience and to the intended purpose of informing, interesting or persuading. Presenter usually spoke clearly to ensure audience comprehension. %elivery was usually fluent.

Vocabulary, sentence structure, grammar Pronunciation Cultural conventions for oral presentation

The vocabulary of the presentation was mainly appropriate for the topic. The presentation content was occasionally grammatically correct.

The vocabulary of the presentation was appropriate for the topic. Sentence structures were usually correct. The presentation content was usually grammatically correct. Pronunciation and intonation is usually correct. Greetings are culturally appropriate. &uestions are answered appropriately.

The vocabulary of the presentation was appropriate for the topic. " variety of phrases and sentence structures were used. The presentation content was grammatically correct. Pronunciation and intonation is correct and confident. Greetings are culturally appropriate. Gestures, stance and eye contact are appropriate. &uestions are answered appropriately. *isual aids were carefully prepared and supported the presentation effectively. They clarified and reinforced the spoken message. The aids added impact and interest to the presentation. The presentation was summed up clearly and effectively, with key points emphasised. &uestions answered with little difficulty. *ery good knowledge of the topic was demonstrated. anguage was correct and fluent.

Pronunciation occasionally correct, but often hesitant and inaccurate. Greetings and general presentation are not culturally inappropriate.

'o visual aids were used( O)

Use of visual aids

*isual aids were occasionally appropriate and related to the spoken message.

*isual aids supported the presentation effectively. They clarified and reinforced the spoken message.

Conclusion of topic

"n attempt was made to conclude the presentation. 'ot all $uestions could be answered. &uestions answered with difficulty, and little knowledge of the topic was demonstrated.

The presentation was summed up clearly.

+ost $uestions answered. "nswers showed good knowledge and understanding of the topic. anguage was mainly correct.

Answering uestions from audience

You might also like