You are on page 1of 88

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO

Theory of Plates
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
Theory of Plates
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
When a body is bounded by surfaces, flat
in geometry, whose lateral dimensions are
large compared to the separation between
the surfaces is called a PLATE
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
2
Plates are initially flat structural elements
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Plates are subjected to transverse loads loads
normal to its mid-surface
Transverse loads supported by combined bending
and shear action
Plates may be subjected to in-plane loading also
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
3
Plates may be subjected to in-plane loading also
=> uniform stress distribution => membrane
Membrane action in-plane loading or
pronounced curvature & slope
Plate bending plates mid-surface doesnt
experience appreciable stretching or contraction
In-plane loads cause stretching and/or contraction
of mid-surface
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
Plate stretching
N
x
N
x
x
z
t
Uniform stretching of the plate => u
o
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
4
Uniform stretching of the plate => u
o
q
Axial deformation due to transverse load
Net deformation = Algebraic sum of uniform stretching
and axial deformation due to bending load
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Introduction
For plates -
Thin & thick plates
Thin plate => b = smallest side
Thick plate =>
b t 20 <
b t 20 >
2000
1
10
1

b
t
t

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
5
Small deflections
Thin plate theory Kirchoffs Classical
Plate Theory (KCPT)
Thick plate theory Reissner Mindlin
Plate Theory (MPT)
5
t
w
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
KCPT - Assumptions
Assumptions
Thickness is much smaller than the other physical
dimensions
vertical deflection w(x, y, z) = w(x, y)
Displacements u, v & w are small compared to
plate thickness
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
6
plate thickness
Governing equations are derived based on undeformed
geometry
In plane strains are small compared to unity
consider only linear strains
Normal stresses in transverse direction are small
compared with other stresses neglected
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
KCPT - Assumptions
Material linear elastic Hookes law holds good
Middle surface remains unstrained during bending
neutral surface
Normals to the middle surface before deformation
remain normal to the same surface after
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
7
remain normal to the same surface after
deformation => doesnt imply shear across section
is zero transverse shear strain makes a negligible
contribution to deflections.
Transverse shear strains are negligible
Rotary inertia is neglected
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Sign convention
Following sign convention will be followed
z
M
z
z

z
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
8
y
x
M
x
M
y
M
z
x

x

y

z
y
Positive moments Positive rotations
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Bending deformations
y
z
D
Bending takes
place in both planes
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
9
x
A
B
z
x
A
B
A
B

View D
Rotation =>
y
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Bending deformations
Deformation in x direction
Deformation in y direction
( ) y x z z y x u
y
, ) , , ( =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
10
Deformation in y direction
Vertical deformation
( ) y x z z y x v
x
, ) , , ( =
) , ( y x w w =
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strains
Assumption out of plane shear strain -
negligible
w w
x
w
z
u
xz

=

= 0
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
11
y
w
y
w
y
w
z
v
x
w
x
w
x x yz
yz
y y xz

= => =

+ = =>
=

= => =

+ = =>


0
0
0
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strains
Non-zero strains
w v
x
w
z
x
z
x
u
y
xx

=
2
2
2

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
12
y x
w
z
x
v
y
u
y
w
z
y
z
y
v
xy
x
yy

=
2
2
2
2

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Stresses
Thin plate out of plane shear strains vanish out
of plane shear stresses also vanish
0 , 0 = =
yz xz

z

xz
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
13
Out of plane normal stress is also assumed to be
zero logical thin structure plane stress
conditions
y

yz

yz
x

xz

xz
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Stresses
Non-zero stress components
y
z

xx
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
14
x

yy

yy

xx

xy

xy
All three stress components,
xx
,
yy
,
xy
in-plane
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Curvatures
Curvature reciprocal of radius of bending
Rate of change of slope
z
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
15
R
x
dx
x
w
w*
dx

y
dx
x
w

x
w
y

= = = - rotation slope
xx
y
x
w
x

=
2
2
curvatue
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Curvatures
Similarly bending in yz plane introduces a
curvature
2
2
y
w
yy

=
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
16
Twisting of plate
y
y x
w
xy

=
2
2
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Constitutive law
Linear elastic isotropic Hookean material
Three stress and strain components

=
E E
yy
xx
xx
Writing all three equations in
matrix form
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
17
( )


+ = =
=
=
1 2
E G
E E
E E
xy xy
xy
xx
yy
yy
xx

(
(
(
(

(
(
(

xy
yy
xx
xy
yy
xx
xy
yy
xx
xy
yy
xx
E
E

2
1
0 0
0 1
0 1
1
) 1 ( 2 0 0
0 1
0 1
1
2
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Constitutive law
Express strains in terms of curvatures

(
(
(
(

y
w
x
w
Ez
yy
xx
2
2
2
2
2
1
0 0
0 1
0 1
1

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
18

(
(

y x
w
y
xy
2
2
2
1
0 0
1

Variation of stresses across thickness is linear


Basis thin plates plane section remain plane after
bending variation of axial deflection is linear across
thickness strains also vary linearly
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Equilibrium equations
Equilibrium of an infinitesimal element
y
z
dx
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
19
x
dx
dy
t

*
yz
dx
dy

*
yy

yy

xx

*
xx

xy

*
xy

xy

*
xy

*
xz

*
yz
Forces acting on an infinitesimal
element dx dy dz
y
x
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Equilibrium equations
Equilibrium in x direction
| |

=
+ +
dzdx dxdy dydz
dzdx dxdy dydz
yx zx xx
yx zx xx



* * *
0
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
20
|
|

\
|

+ =
|

\
|

+ =
|

\
|

+ =
dy
y
dz
z
dx
x
yx
yx yx
zx
zx zx
xx
xx xx


*
*
*
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Equilibrium equations
Substitute the following equation is
obtained
(1) - 0 =

z y x
xz
xy
xx

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
21
Similarly take equilibrium in y and z directions
(2) - 0 =

z y x
yz yy xy

(3) - 0 =

z y x
zz
yz
xz

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Shear stresses
From equation (1) shear stress
xz
can be
computed
Use stress deflection/curvature relations
w Ez w w Ez
2 2 2

(

(
| |

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
22
( )
( ) w
x
Ez
z
y x
w
y x
w
x
w Ez
z
z y x
w Ez
y y
w
x
w Ez
x
xz
xz
xz
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
1 1

\
|

|
|

\
|

\
|

+
(

+
(

|
|

\
|

Integrate this across thickness to get shear stress


R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Shear stresses
Integrate from mid plane to top surface of
plate
( ) ( )

\
|

=


1 1
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
dz z
x
w E
dz
x
w Ez
d
h h
xz

z
z
z = h/2
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
23
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
|
|

\
|

= =>
|
|

\
|

= =>
(

\
|

=

\


4 1 2
4 1 2
2 1
1 1
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
2 2
2
2
0
2
h
z
x
w E
z
h
x
w E
z
x
w E
x x
xz
xz
h
z
xz
z
xz

Parabolic variation
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Moments
Moment wrt y axis
|
|

\
|

=
= =
=
2
2
2
2
2
1 x
w
x
w Ez
dz z zdF dM
dz dF
xx
xx xx y
xx xx

Neutral plane
z
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
24
( )
|
|

\
|

=
|
|

\
|

=
|
|

\
|

= =>
|

2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 12
1
1
1
y
w
x
w Eh
M
dz z
y
w
x
w E
M
y
w
x
w Ez
dM
x x
y
h
h
y
y

x
y

xx
z
dz
dy
dx
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Moments
Moment wrt x axis
|
|

\
|

=
2
2
2
2
2
3
) 1 ( 12 y
w
x
w Eh
M
x

Neutral plane
z
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
25
x
y
z

xy z
dz
dy
dx
Twisting moment due to shear
stress
xy
( )
y x
w Eh
M
xy

=
2
2
3
1
) 1 ( 12

) 1 ( 12
2
3

=
Eh
D
Compare with section
modulus of beam
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Shear forces
Vertical equilibrium of
plate
z
q
dx
x
Q
Q Q
dx Q dy Q qdxdy dx Q dy Q
x
x x
y x y x

+ =
= + +
*
* *
0
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
26
x
y
q
dy
dx
Q
*
x
Q
*
y
Q
y
Q
x
dy
y
Q
Q Q
y
y y

+ =
*
Substitute these and simplify
q
y
Q
x
Q
y
x
=

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Shear forces
Shear forces across thickness can be
computed by integrating shear stress across
thickness
dz Q
h
h
yz y
=

2
2
per unit width
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
27
y
w
D
y
w Eh
Q
dz
h
z
y
w E
Q
h
z
y
w E
y
h
h
y
yz
h

=
|
|

\
|

=
|
|

\
|

) ( ) (
) 1 ( 12
4
) (
) 1 ( 2
4
) (
) 1 ( 2
2 2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Governing equation
Similar expression for Q
x
x
w
D Q
x


=
) (
2
Substitute Q
x
and Q
y
in the following expression vertical
equilibrium
q
Q
Q
y
x
=

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
28
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
D
q
w
y x
D
q
w
y
w
x
q w
y
D
y
w
x
D
x
q
y
Q
x
Q
y
x
=
|
|

\
|

=>
=

=>
=
|
|

\
|

+
|

\
|

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Governing equation
Governing equation
( )
D
q
w
D
q
w
y x
= =>
=
|
|

\
|

2 2
2
2
2
2
2
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
29
( )
D
q
D
w
= =>
= =>
4
D
q
y
w
y x
w
x
w
=

4
4
2 2
4
4
4
2
Bi-harmonic equation
Compare with beam equation
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Boundary conditions
Well posed problem Governing equations
and boundary conditions
Three basic boundary conditions
Simply supported
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
30
Simply supported
Clamped and
Free edge
Vertical deflection and their derivatives
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Simply supported
Simply supported for eg beam => vertical
deflection = 0 and moment = 0
( ) 0 , = y x w
Simply supported
x = const
For edge, x = const
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
31
0
2
2
2
2
=
|
|

\
|

=
y
w
x
w
D M
y

Simply supported
x
y
y = const
w = 0 implies second derivative in the
direction tangent to this line is zero
0
2
2
=

x
w
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Simply supported
Simply supported condition along edge y =
const
|
|
|

|

+

=
=
2 2
0
w w
D M
w

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
32
|
|

\
|

=
2 2
y
w
x
w
D M
x

w = 0 implies second derivative in the
direction tangent to this line is zero
0
2
2
=

y
w
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Clamped
Deflection and slope in normal directions
vanish
0
0
=

=
w
w
x = constant
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
33
0 =
x
0
0
=

=
y
w
w
y = constant
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Free edges
Free edge Free from any external loads
Natural boundary conditions
Bending moment and Shear force vanish
Bending moment
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
34
Bending moment
const y at 0
const at x 0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
= =
|
|

\
|

=
= =
|
|

\
|

=
y
w
x
w
D M
y
w
x
w
D M
x
y

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Free edges
Moment M
xy
and shear forces
M
xy
M
dy
The net force acting on
the face
M
M
M Q
xy
+

=
'
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
35
dy
M
xy
dx
M
xy
M
xy
dy
dy
y
M
M
xy
xy

+
dy
y
M
M
xy
xy

+
y
M
Q
M
y
M
M Q
xy
x
xy
xy
xy x

= =>
+

=
'
'
Total shear force,
V
x
= Q
x
+ Q
x

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Free edges
Total shear force,
( ) ( )
|
|

\
|

= =>
+ =
x
w
x
D w
x
D V
Q Q V
x
x x x
2
2
2
'
1
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
36
( ) ( )
( )
( )
(

=
(

= =>
|
|

= =>
y x
w
y
w
D V
y x
w
x
w
D V
x x
D w
x
D V
y
x
x
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
1

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Free edges
The forces, V
x
and V
y
=> reduced, or
Kirchoffs or effective shear forces
In case of a free edge,
3 3
(

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
37
( )
( ) const y at 0 2
const at x 0 2
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
= =
(

=
= =
(

=
y x
w
y
w
D V
y x
w
x
w
D V
y
x

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Bending of plates
Governing equation of plate rectangular
plate bending
( )
D
q
w =
2 2
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
38
Solution to this equation product of two
functions Assume
w= vertical deflection = w(x, y)
external loading, q = q(x, y)
( ) ( ) ( ) y G x F y x w w = = ,
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Bending of plates
Choice of functions algebraic,
trigonometric, hyperbolic etc or
combination of these function
Selection of a function depends on
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
39
Selection of a function depends on
boundary conditions
Simply supported edges trigonometric
function Navier solution
Deflection of a plate can be written as sum
of infinite trigonometric functions
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Bending of plates
Edges, x = 0 and x = a simply supported
Vertical deflection vanish
w(x=0, y)=0, w(x=a, y)=0
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
40
x
y
x = 0
x = a
SS
SS
Possible form of solution
( )

\
|
=
m
m
a
x m
F x F

sin

F
1
, F
2
,.F

are coefficients
Symmetric loading wrt x = a/2
Maximum deflection at x = a/2
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Bending of plates
Other edges simply supported
y = b
SS
Vertical deflection vanish
w(x, y=0)=0, w(x, y=b)=0
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
41
x
y
x = 0,
y = 0
x = a
SS
SS
SS
Possible form of solution
( )

\
|
=
n
n
b
y n
G y G

sin

G
1
, G
2
,.G

are coefficients
Selection of functions based on BCs
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Bending of plates
Final solution,
( )
( )
b
y n
a
x m
G F y x w
m n
n m

sin sin ,

|

\
|
|

\
|
=



r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
42
( )
b
n
a
m
y x w y x w
n m
n
m n
m mn

,
sin sin ,


= =
= =>


Coefficients, F
m
, G
n
and w
mn
computed using
Fourier Series
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Coefficients
Any periodic function can be expanded into
a sine or cosine function using Fourier
expansion
Function of one variable
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
43
( )
( )
a
x m
a
x m
f
a
x m
x f
a
x m
f x f
m
m
m

sin sin sin

sin
' '

= =>
=

Integrate the above from limits 0 to a


R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Coefficients
Integration
( )
( ) ( )
a
m
a
m
a
m
a
dx m m
x
m m
x f
dx
x m x m f
dx
a
x m
a
x m
f dx
a
x m
x f
' '
'
0
'
0
'
cos cos sin sin 2
sin sin sin
(
+ = =>
=




r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
44
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
a
m
m m
m m

m m
x
m m

m m
x
f
dx m m
x
m m
x f
dx
a
x m
a
x m f
0
'
'
'
'
0
' '
0
a
a
sin
a
a
sin
2

a
cos
a
cos
2
sin sin 2
2
(
(
(

+
+

=>
(

+ = =>


Lower limit vanishes, evaluate upper limit
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Coefficients
Upper limit
( )
( )
( ) m m
a
m m
a
x
f
dx
a
x m
x f
m
a

=
'
'
0
'
sin
2

sin

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
45
( )
( )
( ) dx
a
x m
x f
a
f
m m
m m
a f
dx
a
x m
x f
m m
a
a
m
m
a
a x

=
=
= = =>

=
0
'
'
0
'

sin
2
for 0
for
2

sin

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Coefficients
Function of variable y
( )
b
y n
g y g
n
n

sin

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
46
( )
( ) dy
b
y n
y g
b
g
b
y n
b
y n
g
b
y n
y g
b
n
n

sin
2

sin sin sin
0
' '

=
= =>
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Coefficients
Function of two variables
( )
( ) dx
a
x m
a
x m
b
y n
w dx
a
x m
y x w
b
y n
a
x m
w y x w
a x
x
m n
mn
a x
x
m n
mn

=
=

=
=

|
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
=
|
|

\
|
=>
|

\
|
|

\
|
=
0
' '
0

sin sin sin sin ,

sin sin ,


r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
47
( )
( )
( ) dxdy
b
y n
a
x m
y x w
ab
w
dy
b
y n
b
y n
w
a
dxdy
b
y n
a
x m
y x w
b
y n
w
a
dx
a
x m
y x w
a a b a
b y
y
a x
x
mn
b y
y
m n
mn
b y
y
a x
x
m n
mn
a x
x
x
m n
x

=
=
=
=
=
=

=
=
=
=

=
=
= =
|

\
|
|

\
|
= =>
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
=
|
|

\
|
|
|

\
|
=>
|

\
|
=
|
|

\
|
\
\ \
\
0 0
'
0 0 0
' '
'
0
0 0

sin sin ,
4

sin sin
2

sin sin ,

sin
2

sin ,



R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Simply supported plate
Assume loading over plate
( )
b
y n
a
x m
q y x q q
m n
mn

sin sin ,


= =
Solution
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
48
Solution
( )
b
y n
a
x m
w y x w w
m n
mn

sin sin ,


= =
Governing equation
D
q
y
w
y x
w
x
w
=

4
4
2 2
4
4
4
2
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Simply supported plate
Differentiating vertical displacement
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
=


b
y n
a
x m
w
a
m
x
w
m n
mn

sin sin
4
4
4

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
49
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
=

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
=



b
y n
a
x m
w
b
n
a
m
y x
w
b
y n
a
x m
w
b
n
y
w
m n
mn
m n
mn

sin sin 2 2

sin sin
2 2
2 2
4
4
4
4


R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Simply supported plate
Plug in governing equation
=
(
(

\
|
+
|

\
|
|

\
|
+
|

\
|
q
D
q
w
b
n
b
n
a
m
a
m
mn
mn
2
4 2 2 4

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
50
( )
|

\
|
|

\
|
|
|

\
|
+
= =
|
|

\
|
+
= =>


b
y n
a
x m
b
n
a
m
q
D
y x w w
b
n
a
m
D
q
w
m n
mn
mn
mn

sin sin
1
,
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
4

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


UDL
Uniformly distributed load
q
o
Computation of coefficients
( )
|
|

|
|
|

|
=


y n x m
q y x q
mn

sin sin ,

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
51
( ) dxdy
b
y n
a
x m
y x q
ab
q
a b
mn

sin sin ,
4
0 0


=
( )
|

\
|

\
=

b a
q y x q
m n
mn
sin sin ,
q(x, y) = q
o
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
UDL
Coefficients q
mn
0 0

sin sin
4
dxdy
b
y m
a
x m
q
ab
q
a b
o mn
=

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
52
2 2
0 0
16 4 4

sin sin
4


mn
q
mn
ab
ab
q
q
dy
b
y m
dx
a
x m
ab
q
q
o o
mn
b a
o
mn
=
|

\
|
= =>
=

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
UDL
Vertical deflection
( )


(
(

|
|

|
+
|
|

|
|

\
|
|

\
|
= =
m n
mn
n m
b
y n
a
x m
q
D
y x w w
2
2 2
4

sin sin
1
,

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
53
( )


(
(

\
|
+
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
= =>
(
(

\
|
+
|

\
|
m n
o
b
n
a
m
b
y n
a
x m
D
q
y x w
b
n
a
m
2
2 2
6

sin sin
16
,

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Patch load
A patch load applied over an area u x v
( )
|

\
|
|

\
|
=


b
y n
a
x m
q y x q
mn

sin sin ,

v
q
o
Centroid at (x
o
, y
o
)
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
54
|

\
|
|

\
|
= =>
\ \


b
y n
a
x m
q q
b a
m n
mn o
m n
mn

sin sin

u
v
q
o
dxdy
b
y m
a
x m
ab
q
q
u
x
u
x
v
y
v
y
o
mn
o
o
o
o

sin sin
4
2
2
2
2


+

=
Patch load
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Patch load
Evaluating integrals
=

+

dxdy
b
y m
a
x m
ab
q
q
u
x
u
x
v
y
v
y
o
mn
o
o
o
o

sin sin
4
2 2

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
55
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
= =>
|

\
|
|

\
|
=


b
v m
b
y n
a
u m
a
x m q
mn
q
a
u m
a
x m
m
a
dx
a
x m
o o o
mn
o
u
x
u
x
x y
o
o
o o
2

sin sin
2

sin sin
16
2

sin sin
2
sin
2
2
2
2 2

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Patch load
Deflection
( )
(
(

|
|

|
+
|
|

|
|

\
|
|

\
|
=


n m
mn
b
y n
a
x m
S
D
q
y x w
m n
mn
o

sin sin
16
,
2 2
6

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
56
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
|

\
|
=
(
(

\
|
+
|

\
|
b
v m
b
y n
a
u m
a
x m
S
b
n
a
m
mn
D
o o
mn
m n
2

sin sin
2

sin sin
where,

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Point load
Point load
uv
P
q
o
=
P
(x
o
, y
o
)
Assume the point load acts over
an infinitesimal area u x v
Corresponding UDL P
q =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
57
From the earlier analysis
b
v n
a
u m
b
y n
a
x m
uv
P
mn
q
b
v n
a
u m
b
y n
a
x m q
mn
q
o o
mn
o o o
mn
2

sin
2

sin sin sin
16
2

sin
2

sin sin sin
16
2
2

= =>
=
uv
q
o
=
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Point load
Simplifying
v m
b
v n
u m
a
u m
b
y n
a
x m
ab
P
q
o o
mn

2

sin

2

sin

sin sin
4


|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|

|
= =>
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
58
b
y n
a
x m
ab
P
q
b
v m
a
u m
b a ab
q
o o
mn
mn

sin sin
4
2

2

sin sin


= =>
|
|
|

\
|
|
|

\
= =>
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Point load
Deflection due to point load
( )
b
y m
a
x m
S
abD
P
y x w
mn

sin sin
4
,
2
'
4

(
=


r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
59
( )
b
y m
a
x m
S
b
n
a
m
abD
y x w
o o
mn
m m

sin sin
,
'
2
2 2
4

=
(
(

\
|
+
|

\
|
=

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Bending & in-plane loading
Plates are subjected to in-plane loading also in
addition to lateral / transverse loads
In-plane loading tensile or compressive
Large in-plane compressive loads Buckling takes
place
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
60
place
Buckling non-linear phenomenon
disproportionate increase of displacement with
load
Critical load ability to resist axial load ceases
change in deformation shape
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Bending & in-plane loading
Thin walled members cross-sections like
I, L, H, C etc undergo buckling
thin plates of small widths
Combined loading of a rectangular plate
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
61
Combined loading of a rectangular plate
loads
In-plane forces: N
x
, N
y
, N
xy
and N
yx
Transverse forces / moments: M
x
, M
y
, M
xy
, M
yx
,
Q
x
and Q
y
Small deformation and large deformation
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
In-plane forces
Infinitesimal element => dA = dx dy
N
x
*
dx
N
xy
*

x
*
Q
x
*

x
*
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
62
N
x
dx
x
z

x
Q
x

x
In-plane loading Transverse/out-of-plane loading
For small angles => Sin and Cos 1
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
In-plane forces
Force equilibrium in x-direction
sin cos
cos cos cos
* *
*
|
|

|

+ |
|

|

+
+
|

\
|

+ +
dy dx
Q
Q dx dy
N
N
dx N dy dx
x
N
N dy N
x
xy
y xy x
x
x x x


r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
63
0
0 sin sin sin
sin cos
*
* *
=

=>
= +
|
|

\
|

+ +
|

\
|

+
|
|

\
|

+
y
N
x
N
dx Q dx dy
y
Q
Q dy Q
dy dx
x
Q
Q dx dy
y
N
N
xy
x
y y y
y
y x x
x
x
x y
xy
xy


If there are no in-plane forces equation vanishes
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
In-plane forces
Force equilibrium in y-direction
Angle is not equal to zero, but, small
0 =

y
N
x
N
y xy
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
64
Angle is not equal to zero, but, small
y
w
x
w
y x

=



,
1 cos and sin
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
In-plane forces
Force equilibrium in x-direction

2
|
|
|

|

+

|
|

|

+
|
|
|

|

+
+
|

\
|

+ +
dx
w w
dy dx
Q
Q dx dy
N
N
dx N dy dx
x
N
N dy N
x
xy
xy
x
x x
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
65
0
s order term higher Neglect
0
2
2
2
=

=>
=

+
|
|

\
|

|
|

\
|

+
|
|

\
|

\
|

+
|
|

\
|

+
y
N
x
N
y
w
dx Q dy
y
w
y
w
dx dy
y
Q
Q
x
w
dy Q
dx
x
w
x
w
dy dx
x
Q
Q dx dy
y
N
N
xy
x
y
y
y x
x
x
xy
xy
No change in in-
plane equilibrium
equations
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
In-plane forces
Similar expression for force equilibrium in
y-direction
Force equilibrium in z-direction
Contribution from in-plane normal forces, N
x
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
66
Contribution from in-plane normal forces, N
x
and N
y
and shear force, N
xy
Contribution from shear force, Q
x
and Q
y
Contribution from externally applied load, q
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Z-direction
sin sin
sin sin
sin sin
|
|
|

|
|
|

|

+

|
|

|

+ +

|
|

\
|
|
|

\
|

|
|

\
|

+ +

|
|

\
|
|

\
|

\
|

+ +

dy
w w
dx dy
N
N
w
dx N
dy
y
w
y y
w
dx dy
y
N
N
y
w
dx N
dx
x
w
x x
w
dy dx
x
N
N
x
w
dy N
xy
y
y y
x
x x
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
67
0 cos cos
cos cos
sin sin
sin sin
= +
|
|

\
|
|
|

\
|

|
|

\
|

+ +

|
|

\
|
|

\
|

\
|

+ +

|
|

\
|
|
|

\
|

|
|

\
|

+ +

|
|

\
|
|

\
|

|
|

\
|

+ +

qdxdy dy
y
w
y y
w
dy
y
Q
Q
y
w
dx Q
dx
x
w
x x
w
dy dx
x
Q
Q
x
w
dy Q
dx
y
w
x y
w
dy dx
x
N
N
y
w
dy N
dy
x
w
y x
w
dx dy
y
N
N
x
w
dx N
y
y y
x
x x
xy
xy xy
xy
xy xy
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Z-direction
If no in-plane forces acting
q
y
Q
x
Q
y
x
=

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
68
Presence of in-plane forces
0 2
2
2 2
2
2
= +

q
y
Q
x
Q
y
w
N
y x
w
N
x
w
N
y
x
y xy x
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Z-direction
Substituting Q
x
and Q
y
( ) ( ) w
y
D Q w
x
D Q
y x
2 2
,

+
w
N
w
N
w
N
2 2 2
2
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
69
( ) ( )
|
|

\
|
+

= =>
= +
|
|

\
|

+
|

\
|

+

+

q
y
w
N
y x
w
N
x
w
N
D
w
q w
y
D
y
w
x
D
x
y
N
y x
N
x
N
y xy x
y xy x
2
2 2
2
2
4
2 2
2 2
2
1
0
2
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate buckling
Buckling of thin plate
(

+ =
2
2 2
2
2
4
2
1
y
w
N
x y
w
N
x
w
N q
D
w
y xy x
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
70
Assume, q = 0, in-plane load, N
x
= N
1
, rest zero
2
2
4
4
2 2
4
4
4
2
x
w
D
N
y
w
y x
w
x
w
x

Assume all four edges are simply supported


Navier solution to plate bending
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate buckling
Plate deflection
( )
n m
y x w y x w w
m n
n m mn


= =
= =


,
sin sin ,
Substitute in
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
71
b
n
a
m
n m

= = ,
Substitute in
governing equation
( )
2
1
2
2 2
2
1
4 2 2 4
0 2
m n m
m n n m m
D
N
D
N


= + =>
= + +
Characteristic
equation
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate buckling
From characteristic equation
( )
2
2 2 2
1
2
1
2
2 2
n m m N
D
N
m n m
(
(

|
|

|
+
|
|

|
=
|
|

|
=>
= +


r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
72
ratio Aspect - /
2
2
2
2
1
2
2 2
2
2 2
1
1
b a c
n
m
c
c
m
b
D
N
b
n
a
m
m
a D
N
b a a D
=
(

+ = =>
(
(

\
|
+
|

\
|
= =>
(
(

\
+
|

\
=
|

\
=>

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Plate buckling
Critical load smallest value
Increase in N
1
with n
2
Minimum value of
n is equal to one buckled shape in y-
direction single half sine wave
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
73
direction single half sine wave
2
2
2
1
(

+ =
m
c
c
m
b
D
N

N
1
is a function of variable m for minimum value of
m, differentiate N
1
wrt m
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate buckling
Differentiate
2 2
2
1
1
0
1 2
c
m
c
c m
c
c
m
b
D
dm
dN
| |
=
|

\
|

|

\
|
+ =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
74
2
2
1
2
4

0
1
b
D
N
b
a
c m
m
c
c
cr

=
= = =>
=
|

\
|
=>
Whole number
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate buckling
Number of half sine waves cant be a
whole number it should be an integer
Equation for critical load for n = 1
2

2
(
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
75
2
2
1
b
D
K N

=
2
(

+ =
m
c
c
m
K
Plotting K vs aspect ratio = c = a/b
for various integer values of m
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate buckling
K vs aspect ratio
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
76
1.414 2.449
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate buckling
From figure, value of K is same as
intersection points of m and m+1
N
1
critical load at m when load is increased, buckled
form changes from m to m+1
Curves for m = 1 and
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
77
At transition from m to m+1
( )
( ) 1
1
1
1
2
2 2
+ =
+ = =>
|

\
|
+
+
+
=
|

\
|
+
m m c
m m c
m
c
c
m
m
c
c
m
Curves for m = 1 and
m = 2 meet at c = 2
Aspect ratio less than
2 => m = 1
Aspect ratio from 2
to 6, m = 2
C>4 => K 4
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate buckling
Estimation of buckling load
t = 1 cm, a = 2.3 m, b = 1 m, E = 200 GPa, = 0.30
Flexural modulus
( ) 10 1 10 200
2
2 9 3
=

= =

Et
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
78
( )
( )
( )
0786 . 4
2
3 . 2
3 . 2
2
2 3 . 2
1
3 . 2
96 . 17
3 . 0 1 12
10 1 10 200
1 12
2 2
2
2 9
2
3
=
(

+ =
(

+ = =>
= => = = =
=

m
c
c
m
K
m
b
a
c
kNm
Et
D

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Plate buckling
Minimum critical load
MN b N N
m MN
b
D
b
D
K N
cr
cr
72 . 73
/ 72 . 73 086 . 4
1
2
2
2
2
1
= =
= = =

r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
79
MN b N N
cr
72 . 73
1
= =
In the above expression, for a given width and elastic
properties of plate, critical load depends on K. In turn
K depends on m for a given aspect ratio, c
2890 . 4 , 3
0786 . 4 , 2
4790 . 7 , 1 , 3 . 2
= =
= =
= = =
K m
K m
K m c
Minimum value of
K is considered for
estimation of N
cr
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate and column buckling
Uniaxial load for plate buckling
( )
3 2 2
1
2
2
1

= = =
=
Et
K
D
K
N
b
D
K N
crp
crp
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
80
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
2
1
2
2
1 1
2
2
2
1
2 2 2
1
1
1 12
,
1 12
1 12

= = =>

= =>

= = =
K
C
t
b
E
C
t
b
E K
Et
t b
K
t b
D
K
t
crp
crp
crp
crp
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate and column buckling
Buckling of a column
( )
2
2
2 2
2
2
2
2
EA
C
EAk
C P
l
EI
C P
cr
cr

= = =>
=
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
81
( )
( )
( )
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
t
b
E
C
k
l
E
C
A
P
k
l
C
l
C P
crp
cr
crc
cr

=
= = =>
= = =>
Column
Plate
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Plate and column buckling
Critical stress for plate depends on thinness
ratio = t/b not on the length
depends on width
More thinner plate lesser bucking load
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
82
More thinner plate lesser bucking load
Critical stress in column depends on
slenderness ratio
Longer columns lower critical load
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy
In thin plate theory, out-of-plane shear
stresses vanish =>
xz
,
yz
and
zz
Stress components contributing to strain
energy =>
xx
,
yy
and
xy
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
83
energy =>
xx
,
yy
and
xy
Strain energy,
( ) V d U
V
xy xy yy yy xx xx

2
1

+ + =
Linear elastic material
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy
Strain energy,
{ }{ }

=
V
T
xy yy xx xy yy xx
V d U
2
1
w


2
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
84
{ } [ ]{ }

C
y x
w
y
w
x
w
Ez Ez
xy
yy
xx
xy
yy
xx
= =>

(
(
(
(

(
(
(
(

2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
1
0 0
0 1
0 1
1
2
1
0 0
0 1
0 1
1
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy
Strain energy,
{ } { } { } [ ]{ }
w w w
V d C V d U
V
T
V
T
2 2 2
2
1
2
1

(

|
|

|

= =
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
85
( )
( )
V d z
y x
w
x
w
y
w
x
w
x
w
y
w
x
w
E
U
V
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
1 2

(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(

|
|

\
|

|
|

\
|

|
|

\
|

= =>

R&DE (Engineers), DRDO


Strain energy
Infinitesimal volume, dV = dxdydz
Carry out integration over thickness => dz
3 2
2
=

+
h
h
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
86
( )
2
3
2
2
2
1 12
12

=
=

Eh
D
h
dz z
h
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
Strain energy
Simplify
dxdy
x
w
x
w
D
U

(
|
|

\
|

=
2
2
2
2
2
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
87
( )
dxdy
y x
w
x
w
x
w
U
A

)
`

(
(

|
|

\
|


=
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
2

Strain energy Finite Element Method Total


potential approach
R&DE (Engineers), DRDO
r
d
_
m
e
c
h
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
.
i
n
Ramadas Chennamsetti
88

You might also like