Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fuel Economy? - Environment? - Theraputic???: NEW Data
Fuel Economy? - Environment? - Theraputic???: NEW Data
FUEL ECONOMY?
ENVIRONMENT?
THERAPUTIC???
Dear Reader,
Although this book is copyrighted, Water4Gas
TECHNOLOGY is FREE TO USE for all your private AND
commercial uses. Feel free to copy the government and
science references given here to educate your students.
Third party trademarks and logos which are mentioned or
linked from this book, are proprietary to their respective
owners.
Ozzie Freedom
Founder,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1
DISCLAIMERS &
COPYRIGHTS
TECHNICAL DISCLAIMER
The Patents, research papers and articles/links listed, quoted or mentioned in this book
do not always make a distinction between hydrogen from water, on demand, or
hydrogen from other sources. Please pay attention to details!
NO CLAIMS ARE MADE BY THE AUTHOR AS TO THE TECHNICAL
ACCURACY, SCIENTIFIC CORRECTNESS, OR COMPLETENESS, OF
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN OR IN RELATED
DOCUMENTS AND LINKS.
The materials in this book including those materials, documents and websites
references from it express solely the opinions of their respective authors and are not
necessarily true for you, for your field of technology or your geographical area. The
reader is strongly advised to use such materials as pointers for further study, before
acting upon any of the information provided.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
The views, ideas and information provided in this book represent the Authors opinions
and have not been approved by any authoritative body on science, health or economy.
Since the information in this book, as well as on the Publisher's web site, are provided
AS-IS, there is no warranty expressed or implied concerning the suitability of the
technology or related information, for any particular application, circumstance or
geographical area. WATER FUEL TECHNOLOGY IS PURELY EXPERIMENTAL; therefore no
specific results can be guaranteed for any model of vehicle, marine vessel, generator, or
for any other purpose or application. Use of the information and the technology, as well
as any related devices or products, is at your very own risk. There is no warranty that
any of technologies described or linked in this book is fit for a particular purpose or area.
Although careful precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the Publisher
shall not be held liable to you for damages, including any general, special, incidental or
consequential damages arising out of the use or inability to use the information,
including but not limited to loss or personal injury or losses sustained by the user or
third parties or a failure of the information to produce results, even if such holder or
other party has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
The technologies described in this book are not intended for use in violation of local laws
and regulations which may be applicable to your geographical area. Compliance with any
law, where applicable, is your responsibility. The Publisher and its employees,
executives, distributors and affiliates shall not be held responsible for how your use any
of the technologies, related knowledge or any device thereof.
COPYRIGHT NOTIFICATION
Unlike most other Water4Gas books and publications, this book relies heavily on
external references. It contains several major types of materials, intertwined in most of
its chapters; each type with its own copyrights status:
The scientific references;
Commercial trademarks, logos and references;
The Author's interpretations and opinions, and this book as a whole.
Those materials included or referenced in this book that have been produced by various
government agencies from around the world, are IN THEMSELVES public domain to the
best of the Author's knowledge. Pursuant to U.S. Federal Law, government-produced
materials appearing in this book and links thereof are not copyright protected. This rule
may not be applicable in your country.
However, other materials including trademarks and logos used in this book are
properties of their respective owners, and are protected by national and international
intellectual property laws, conventions and treaties.
Under copyright and related laws it is not legal amongst other things to copy, distribute,
publicly perform, or broadcast a protected work, or put it on the Internet, unless you
have permission from all of the relevant owners of rights, or when a specific exception
exists in the copyright law of your country (Copyright and related rights apply in the 150
countries that are members of various international copyright treaties, and the 145
countries that are members of the World Trade Organization.)
DO NOT SELL THIS BOOK. You can use this book yourself, but DO NOT give it away
as a free download. Send anyone you wish to help or educate to download the book as a
complete work from the Publisher's website as provided above.
This book and related knowledge may be used for any purpose private or commercial,
but not for ridiculing or defaming any individuals, technologies, companies or agencies.
In other words, it would be permissible and even endorsed to use the knowledge and
links to educate the public and to bring about better conditions: technological,
environmental, economical and social.
Chapter 2
WHAT IS WATER-FUEL?
THE PROBLEMS AT HAND
These two problems have been discussed millions of times, and are being discussed
right now in millions of homes, offices and online discussions/blogs across the world. But
let me just show you how long this discussion has been KNOWN AND ADVERTISED.
Back in 1904 in London, engineer Booth and chemist Kershaw published their book titled
SMOKE PREVENTION AND FUEL ECONOMY (Archibald, Constable & Co., London).
Heres an excerpt from the book, regarding the importance of better combustion of
fuels:
The Dream
The water car must have been a long time dream of millions, if not billions of people.
This dream has been spurred by media publications of water car developments that are
about to arrive and are just around the corner.
I remember sitting and watching TV in Israel, several DECADES ago. An article showed a
pretty looking car running ON WATER ALONE (so they said) on the streets of some
French city. The narrator said that this car, invented in France, is fully developed and
ready to be mass produced in two months. He said it would cost about 200,000 Francs
which didnt sound too expensive (I think it was $15,000 at the time).
The car looked very modern, fully developed and very appealing, as you would expect
from a French car. Something that everybody would want if they were in the market for
a new car.
I waited two months. Nothing. I waited two decades. Still nothing. And I started to thing
that something went awfully wrong how come nobody even mentions that pretty car
that ran on water?
The Reality
The dream has been with me ever since I saw that car on TV. The reality sunk in, that
there is some serious political problem here, going against technology. Or at least going
against the dream people were having. If theres a good dream, lets say Man wants to
fly to the Moon but still cannot, it stands to reason that the Educational System and the
Media should both endorse the dream, until it becomes a reality. Thats exactly what
happened decades before Armstrong stepped on the Moon, remember?
When the Internet started proliferating, news about water-cars and air-cars became
more prominent, even if slowly at first. A tiny little article about an air car, just about to
start mass production in South Africa, spurred my imagination again, in the late 1990s.
But again, several months later when there was no peep from South Africa about no air
car, I once again got the reality: we have a problem...
It must have been late 2004 or early 2005 when Drunvalo Melchizedek of Spirit of Maat
released one of the firstwell, what can be best described as water car plans.
I hurried up and downloaded the plans, thinking they were going to disappear shortly. If
Im not mistaken, Mr. Melchizedek himself expressed the same concern on his website;
after Stanley Meyer's mysterious death, the atmosphere of those days still felt very
hostile to water-fuel. Surprisingly, the plans continued to be available and are still in
circulation today, and through my websites were delivered into thousands of hands. I
dont know of anybody who actually built a car based on these plans, but it surely
rekindled the dream in many water-fuel enthusiasts.
Oh, you want to know what the bleep is water-fuel. I know, I know, Im getting to it and
youll be able to see the complete picture in a minute.
Through my research and my own experimentation, I was starting to realize that there
are many layers and divisions to this field of water-fuel. And I also found out that the
world was (in 2005) reluctant to accept the dream to the point of DOING SOMETHING
ABOUT IT.
I offered my friends father, a seasoned mechanic from California, to build a prototype of
the water car plans. He looked at them and said that it wouldn't work. On the other
hand, I couldnt build such a car at home. Now at home, too, means different things to
different people. For me, even though I was sitting in America, I wasnt living the
American (Middle-Class) Dream so I didnt have a garage or basement to work in. All I
had was a tiny little room in an apartment building, with no space to make noise using
power tools, or to build any project larger than my small desk.
My observation was: the problem was complexity. Yes, and affordability. And I
started looking for anything the I CAN DO with simple hand tools, limited time after my
day job and VERY limited budget.
[The Patent numbers mentioned here are only examples you'll see many more in this book]
10
11
12
What is Hydrogen-From-Water?
While Supplemental Hydrogen may be supplied from a tank of pressurized hydrogen,
Supplemental Hydrogen from water comes from water, and the hydrogen is usually
being produced FROM WATER on board the vehicle while you drive. Therefore it is often
called Hydrogen-On-Demand.
And here is the place to highlight the mistake that many nay-sayers are uttering against
Hydrogen-From-Water and water-fuel in general. They look at hydrogen production from
water, and say that the energy you can gain from combusting [burning] hydrogen will
cost you more energy to make than the energy contained in the hydrogen product.
That is not necessarily true, as some advanced research (such as US Patents granted to
Stanley Meyer in 1986, 1989 and 1990) indicate that water splitting can be more
efficient than what is demonstrated to us in high school labs.
BUT THATS NOT THE POINT!!! The point is that Hydrogen-From-Water is aimed at
enhancing regular fuel and the energy does NOT come from the hydrogen all by itself
it must interact with regular fuel. Which is good news for oil companies. They dont
have to close their business and go home. We still need them.
Therefore Hydrogen-From-Water is a division of Supplemental Hydrogen.
Bottom line: Hydrogen-From-Water is one way to have Supplemental Hydrogen, a
cheaper and safer way that can be done at home or economically by a professional
company.
ON SHARING
One of the best things that ever happened to water-fuel is sharing. Here, too, sharing
means different things to different people. Some have trade secrets to hide and are only
willing to share partial information, while others have no restrictions whatsoever on
sharing the fruits of their research and development. To my mind, both are right and we
should be grateful for their contribution to the economy and the environment.
Me, personally, I'm on the open source side as I've always been. That's why I wrote this
book and that's why I have released my entire Water4Gas research for free use by the
worldwide public.
13
Chapter 3
WHERE IS THE PROOF?
WATER FUEL (HYDROGEN ASSISTED
COMBUSTION) - RESEARCH PAPERS
There are many hundreds, if not thousands of technical papers and scientific research
papers validating the benefits of supplemental hydrogen for the improvement of
combustion, both in gasoline and diesel engines, clearly showing a consistent realization
by the experts and scientists supplemental hydrogen IS EFFECTIVE for the reduction
of engine exhaust emissions AND for the improvement of burn characteristics (and
thereby economy) of petroleum based fuels.
If the following statement sounds fierce and non-compromising, it is simply because it is
fierce and non-compromising...
WHOEVER ASKS YOU WHERE IS THE PROOF? IS ASKING OUT OF
IGNORANCE AND SHOULD BE REFERRED TO THE TRUCKLOADS
OF EVIDENCE PRESENTED HERE. IF THEY STILL INSIST THAT
THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE TO WATER-FUEL, IT IS YOU
WHO MUST REALIZE THAT YOU'RE DEALING WITH AN IDIOT
STOP ARGUING AND MOVE ON!
GOOD NEWS
Compelling Evidence found that NASA, the U.S. Patent Office, U.S. Dept. of
Transportation, and Detroit, as well as scientists from around the World, all agree that
Supplemental Hydrogen has the potential to improve Fuel Efficiency, reduce harmful
emissions and allow leaner operation of Internal Combustion Engines.
The list below is only a partial collection of references regarding supplemental hydrogen,
from official publications of NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), DOT
(United States Department of Transportation), USPTO (United States Patent and
Trademark Office) as well as other Patent Offices, JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
California Institute of Technology) and surprisingly, Detroit itself (namely, The Society
of Automotive Engineers based in the city of Troy, Michigan, USA).
Obviously not all documents are saying exactly the same thing, but the overall picture is
clear - SUPPLEMENTAL HYDROGEN CAN GIVE US:
Fuel Efficiency due to better combustion of any grade fuel,
Less emissions due to fuller combustion, and
Leaner operation possible with cleaner emissions.
Find PRACTICAL systems at: www.Water4Gas.com
14
COMPELLING EVIDENCE
In the documentation listed in this book there are nearly 900 pages of official research
papers, plus over 2,370 US/International Patent pages totaling 3,000+ pages of
scientific evidence!
And at the time of writing, it seems, documented evidence of the validity of water-fuel
AS WELL AS new and improved way of getting there, are piling up faster than ever
before.
Twenty one of the documents listed in this book, amounting to about 400 pages, are not
attached to it because they must be purchased from NASA and the SAE (Society of
Automotive Engineers) and I didn't have the funds for that. Therefore, I assumed 15
pages average document size for SAE, and 40 pages average for NASA.
However, the remaining 2,400 pages that I do have attached/linked, should be more
than enough to impress upon you that water-fuel is not the invention of one charlatan
or a couple of backyard dreamers, but a very well researched, very well documented
field of science.
Additionally, the span of time of these documents 1863 to 2012 or nearly 150 years
shows you that water-fuel is nothing new either.
Water-fuel technology is not only well known across the boards, from NASA and DOT
(US Department of Transportation) to universities, individual researchers and leading
engineering groups from around the world. It is also part of the knowledge of many
governments around the world, as is evidenced by the many countries sending waterfuel Patents to be registered with the US Patent office:
Australia
New Zealand
England
Japan
Switzerland
Germany
Spain
Canada
Taiwan
Korea
Philippines
The Netherlands.
Add to it the official documentation by scientists from China, Israel, Hungary, Germany,
Spain, and you get a very world-wide picture.
15
Chapter 4
ANTI-TAMPERING
RUMORS vs. FACTS
DISCLAIMER: THIS CHAPTER CONTAINS NO LEGAL ADVICE BUT MY OWN PERSONAL
OPINIONS, BASED ON MY INTERPRETATION OF OFFICIAL EPA POLICY. FULL ANALYSIS
AND SOURCES GIVEN BELOW YOU SHOULD USE THESE TO FOLLOW MY LINE OF
THOUGHT AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF.
THE RUMORS
Street rumors I have been hearing for
years quoted EPA (US Environmental
Protection
Agency)
anti-tampering
policy, but have only focused on the
negative side without looking at the
broad picture.
The rumors claimed that the EPA does not
allow, and will heavily fine/prosecute
anybody tampering with any fuel
delivery or emissions control system on
any
vehicle.
They
sound
very
intimidating.
Ive
seen
websites
presenting the actual EPA policy, as
proof of the rumors, but, yet again, overlooking some very significant details in the
policy.
It seems that the EPA has invested a lot of consideration regarding the DETAILS and I
thought it deserves another look. Below are the results of my observations.
16
The EPA policy document states that any unauthorized changes to the emission/fuel
systems and combustion process are labeled illegal and you could be fined, etcetera. But
then it ALSO mentions Memorandum 1A and states its general intention:
MY INTERPRETATION
Like my California Civil Law attorney was saying all along (we first examined it in 2006
and later on again in 2008), since we are LOWERING emissions and since we are not
trying to tamper with the vehicle in order to participate in hot-headed street races, were
working WITH the law and not against it.
In my humble opinion, water-fuel enthusiasts MUST take this up and make sure that the
EPA and whoever listens to the EPA would grant, on a regular basis, mandatory rewards
for every vehicle equipped with emission-lowering technology. Water-fuel supporters
should use the EPA policy to (1) morally support their fellow experimenter, and (2) if
need be, protect themselves legally.
17
REASONABLE REASON
When the EPA says reasonable basis for knowing
not adversely affected they mean it.
Every experimenter, whether commercial or
private, should perform smog tests before/after
tampering, to verify that their provisional waterfuel installation has indeed resulted in lowered
emissions. Example of a smog test done in Los
Angeles before and after a Water4Gas installation
(Ford 1989 F-250, 460 cubic inch):
BEFORE Water4Gas
AFTER Water4Gas
18
BEFORE Water4Gas
19
AFTER Water4Gas
Speed:
15 MPH
25 MPH
CO2
14.1
13.7
13.4
n/a
Reduced emissions:
-5 %
NOx
257
287
139
232
-46 %
-19 %
CO
0.03
0.04
CO after Water4Gas
0.01
0.01
-67 %
-75 %
HC
82
63
HC after Water4Gas
31
21
-62 %
-67 %
O2
1.3
1.7
O2 after Water4Gas
1.7
n/a
Reduced emissions:
Reduced emissions:
Reduced emissions:
ADDED OXYGEN:
+30 %
20
Read the entire document and see that there is nothing in it beyond the quote above,
that modifies the spirit or specifics of the original policy, regarding water-fuel. Therefore,
the original policy still holds that EPA will not consider any modification to a certified
emissions control configuration to be a violation of the tampering prohibition if there is a
reasonable basis for knowing that emissions are not adversely affected.
or Potential Harm
EPA guys are reasonable and take into consideration the actual amount of damage done
in terms of excess emissions. In other words, if no harm was done, there is no actual
violation.
Additionally, if you zoom out and get the spirit of the document as a whole, you can see
that it aims at criminals who violate emissions control for financial benefits of avoiding
costs (such as building engines without proper engineering, or bypassing a broken
21
catalytic converter to avoid the cost of a new one). Water-fuel enthusiasts do not fall
within this category.
No.
Product Name
Tested
1.
Super FUELMAX
2.
3.
4.
5.
Vitalizer III
6.
Fuelon Power
7.
Platinum Gasaver
8.
(magnets)
2005
1999
1999
1999
1999
(fuel additive)
1991
1991
AUTOTHERM
(coolant circulation)
1985
9.
POLARION X
(magnets)
1985
10.
(water+alcohol vaporizer)
19831
11.
Cyclone-Z
1983
12.
1983
In actual fact the device was never tested by the EPA! In 1982 they threw the ball back
to the inventor who couldnt afford the extortionate lab fees ($1/mile plus $11,750 for
a 10-minute installation, engine inspection and analyzing simple data). They ignored
successful tests performed by Roy Wilhelm, the Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor for
the city of Missoula, Montana, and submitted by the inventor. Read all about it in the
EPA report: http://www.epa.gov/OMS/consumer/devices/pb83214684.pdf However,
Ive built and installed quite a few of these devices between 2006 and 2008, and they
performed better than I had previously expected. See diagram below the table.
22
No.
Product Name
13.
1983
14.
Hydro-Vac
1983
15.
Kamei Spoilers
1983
16.
1983
17.
1983
18.
Optimizer
1983
19.
P.S.C.U. 01 Device
1983
20.
POWERFUEL
1983
21.
Dresser Economizer
1982
22.
Dynamix
1982
23.
1982
24.
1982
25.
Fuel Economizer
1982
26.
Hot Tip
1982
27.
1982
28.
1982
29.
P.A.S.S. KIT
1982
30.
PETRO-MIZER
1982
31.
POLARION X
1982
32.
Russell Fuelmeiser
1982
33.
1982
34.
Turbo-Carb
1982
35.
1981
36.
Autosaver
1981
37.
Baur Condenser
1981
38.
Dresser Economizer
1981
39.
Fuel Max
1981
40.
Fuel Maximiser
1981
41.
Gas Meiser I
1981
42.
Glynn-50
1981
43.
1981
44.
IDALERT
1981
45.
Moleculetor (metallic)
1981
46.
1981
Tested
23
No.
Product Name
47.
PETROMIZER SYSTEM
1981
48.
SYNeRGy 1
1981
49.
Treis Emulsifier
1981
50.
ULX-15/ULX-15D
1981
51.
1981
52.
1981
53.
1980?
54.
Auto-Miser
1980
55.
Basko Enginecoat
1980
56.
1980
57.
1980
58.
FuelXpander
1980
59.
1980
60.
1980
61.
Ram-Jet
1980
62.
Waag-Injection System
1980
63.
1980
64.
1978
65.
1978
66.
1976
67.
1976
68.
Electro-Dyne Superchoke
1976
69.
Landrum Mini-Carb
1976
70.
1976
71.
1975
72.
1975
73.
1974
74.
1974
75.
1974
76.
1974
77.
1973
78.
1973
79.
1972
80.
1972
Tested
24
No.
Product Name
81.
1972
82.
1972
83.
1972
84.
1972
85.
1972
86.
1972
87.
Brisko PCV
1971
88.
1971
89.
1971
90.
1970
Tested
25
POINTS TO CONSIDER
It is important to note that the EPAs Gas Saving and Aftermarket Retrofit Device
Evaluation Program is not mandatory, and it starts according to the programs rules
only when an invention is fully developed. The program is also restricted to 4-wheeled
highway vehicles weighing 6,000 pounds or less. Therefore, it is limited in scope. Its
not for big rig trucks, boats,
motorcycles, generators, etc.
It seems to me that this voluntary
program fits only fully developed
products that you want to bring to the
market. Experimental technologies,
and
technologies
that
require
customizing any solution (device,
system, installation and/or tuning)
car-by-car
or
engine-by-engine,
cannot be evaluated. Examine the EPA
documents and you'll see what I
mean.
Remember, everything I have said
here is my interpretation of the EPAs
official documents; you are advised to
read them and draw your own
conclusions.
26
Chapter 5
INTERNATIONAL & U.S.
PATENTS
BROWNS GAS IN OFFICIAL
U.S. PATENTS
Note that the U.S. Patent Office is aware of
Browns gas and its various uses, as
described in US Patent #7,067,097,
granted in 2006 to Gregory J. Wojak of
Scottsdale,
Arizona,
in
which
he
describes a unique application whereby
Browns gas is used for producing
diamonds:
This gas is well known and is described,
e.g., in U.S. Patent #6,021,915(2), the entire
disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by
reference into this specification. As is disclosed in
such patent, The Brown's gas that is used in the
present invention is itself a non-explosive mixed gas that consists of hydrogen
and oxygen mixed in a molar3 volume ratio of 2:1, and it is obtained by
electrolysis of water.
Browns gas is also described as KNOWN TECH in Patent #8,101,051 (granted 2012 in
the USA but registered earlier in Japan), and also appears in other patents such as
EP1474547 and 2005/0006228. HHO is mentioned in Patent #8,127,750 B2 (granted
2012) and Patent #7,932,619 (from 2011).
This patent number might be wrong, because the quoted text could not be located in that or any other U.S.
Patent. However, the above quote DOES appear in the approved U.S. Patent 7,067,097 of June 27, 2006.
Molar is a chemical factor describing the concentration or ratio of one ingredient to the mix.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molar_%28concentration%29
27
definitely long enough to make a point. Additionally, it is a useful list for your own
research and development.
Patents any patent starting from the 1800s - can be downloaded, free of
charge, from http://www.FreePatentsOnline.com which is an excellent service
and a true goldmine of data for every researcher no matter the industry.
Note that for downloading the actual PDF documents (so you can see the
drawings) you must open a FREE account with them.
Another great tool is US Patent & Trademark Office, Patent Full Text and Image
Database Search: http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html (to view
the images you need the free TIFF reader from www.alternaTIFF.com)
For UK Patents:
http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-find/p-find-number.htm
Patent Applications
While Patent Applications are official government publications, they have not been
approved yet. However, they are fascinating study material; and besides, applications
provides us with an excellent window into the future of the technology.
28
the Patents listed below, the government experts have officially admitted that apart
from being NEW for their time these apparatuses and methods are indeed:
1. USEFUL (i.e., beneficial), and
2. PRACTICAL (i.e., can be produced by industry).
So you see, the Government officials signed on these documents have clearly and
repeatedly answered the question:
Furthermore, between the lines, the Patent Office sends us another important message:
Patent
Inventor(s)
Download
1863
0040805
US0040805
1884
0308276
Henry Paine
US0308276
1898
0603058
US0603058
1901
0685274
US0685274
1912
1037979
Frank Perkins
US1037979
1918
1262034
Charles Frazer
US1262034
1921
1380183
Martin Boisen
US1380183
1924
1490975
William Howard
US1490975
1928
1660147
William Allan
US1660147
11
1932
GB364180
GB364180
1932
1876879
Walter Drabold
US1876879
1933
1905627
Walter Holland
US1905627
1935
2006676
Charles Garrett
US2006676
1935
2016442
US2016442
1939
2183674
US2183674
1944
2365330
Asa Carmichael
US2365330
1950
2496623
John Fragale
US2496623
Pages
29
Year
Patent
1950
Inventor(s)
Download
2509498
US2509498
1965
3207684
Dotts
US3207684
1966
3262872
US3262872
13
1966
3291714
US3291714
13
1967
3310483
William Rhodes
US3310483
1967
3311097
Mittelstaedt
US3311097
1967
3330755
Mahany
US3330755
1970
3518180
Grotheer
US3518180
1972
3648668
Francisco Pacheco
US3648668
1972
3652431
Reynolds
US3652431
11
1973
3755128
Herwig
US3755128
1976
3933614
Bunn
US3933614
1976
3954592
Horvath (Australia)
US3954592
16
1976
3967589
Papineau
US3967589
1976
3969481
Murray; Hynek
US3969481
1976
3980053
Horvath (Australia)
US3980053
26
1976
3990962
Gotz (Germany)
US3990962
1977
4009006
Hreha
US4009006
1977
4014777
US4014777
11
1977
4023545
US4023545
1978
4080271
Howard Brown
US4080271
1978
4081656
US4081656
11
1978
4105528
US4105528
1978
4107008
Horvath (Australia)
US4107008
30
1978
4113601
Spirig (Switzerland)
US4113601
1978
4124463
US4124463
1979
4161657
Shaffer
US4161657
1980
4184931
Inoue (Japan)
US4184931
1980
4206029
Spirig (Switzerland)
US4206029
1980
4233127
Monahan
US4233127
16
Pages
30
Year
Patent
Inventor(s)
Download
1981
4256060
Donald Kelly
US4256060
10
1981
4265721
Hackmyer
US4265721
1982
4312736
US4312736
1982
4339324
Haas
US4339324
13
1982
4352722
Ohkawa
US4352722
1983
4369737
Sanders
US4369737
1983
4371500
Papineau
US4371500
33
1983
4379043
Chappelle
US4379043
1983
4389981
Stanley Meyer
US4389981
14
1983
4394230
US4394230
20
1983
4421474
Stanley Meyer
US4421474
1984
4425215
Henes
US4425215
11
1984
4442801
Glynn; Andrew
US4442801
10
1984
4465455
Stanley Meyer
US4465455
1984
4465964
John Cover
US4465964
15
1984
4486701
John Cover
US4486701
10
1984
4488951
Nolan; LaConti
US4488951
1986
4599158
Ofenloch
US4599158
1986
4613304
Stanley Meyer
US4613304
1986
4613779
Stanley Meyer
US4613779
10
1986
4628010
Iwanciow
US4628010
1988
4720331
Billings
US4720331
11
1988
4726888
McCambridge
US4726888
1988
4747925
US4747925
1989
4798661
Stanley Meyer
US4798661
19
1989
4826581
Stanley Meyer
US4826581
13
1990
4936961
Stanley Meyer
US4936961
1991
5037518
US5037518
19
Pages
31
Year
Patent
1992
Inventor(s)
Download
5082544
Willey; Radford
US5082544
16
1992
5087344
US5087344
13
1992
5089107
Francisco Pacheco
US5089107
1992
5110436
Schubert; Grigger
US5110436
1992
5143025
Munday (Canada)
US5143025
13
1992
5143047
Woodrow Lee
US5143047
1992
5149407
Stanley Meyer
US5149407
24
1992
5159900
Dammann
US5159900
1993
5231954
Stowe
US5231954
1993
5244558
Chiang (Taiwan)
US5244558
1994
5279260
Munday (Canada)
US5279260
1994
5293857
Stanley Meyer
US5293857
17
1995
5394852
Roy McAlister
1995
5385657
Dungan
US5385657
1995
5399251
US5399251
27
1995
5417817
Dammann; Wallman
US5417817
1995
5435274
Richardson
US5435274
1995
5452688
Rose
US5452688
1995
5552675
Dungan
US5552675
17
1996
5540831
Martin Klein
US5540831
13
1996
HU212560
HU212560
1997
5628881
Lemelson
US5628881
16
1997
5628885
US5628885
15
1997
5632870
Kucherov
US5632870
20
1997
5692459
Richardson
US5692459
1998
5794601
Paul Pantone
US5794601
1998
5711865
Caesar (Australia)
US5711865
22
1998
5792325
Richardson
US5792325
1998
5826548
Richardson
US5826548
Pages
32
Year
Patent
1998
Inventor(s)
Download
5843292
Spiros (Australia)
US5843292
36
1998
5852993
Anderson
US5852993
11
1999
5858185
US5858185
1999
5863413
Caren; Ekchian
US5863413
14
1999
5888361
US5888361
20
1999
5997283
Spiros (Australia)
US5997283
33
2000
6011192
Baker; Lokhandwala
US6011192
24
2000
6024935
US6024935
60
2000
6048500
Caren; Ekchian
US6048500
14
2000
6113748
William Richardson
US6113748
10
2000
6119651
Herman Anderson
US6119651
20
2000
6126794
US6126794
17
2001
6183604
Ruggero Santilli
US6183604
11
2001
6209493
Ross
US6209493
17
2001
6257175
US6257175
22
2002
6372100
US6372100
13
2002
6375812
Leonida
US6375812
2002
6419815
Chambers (Canada)
US6419815
17
2002
6461408
Buxbaum
US6461408
26
2003
EP1474547
(European)
EP1474547A1
35
2003
6512201
George Blankenship
US6512201
22
2003
6540966
Ruggero Santilli
US6540966
26
2003
6544316
US6544316
27
2003
6554975
Dammann; Wallman
US6554975
2003
6572740
US6572740
24
2003
6592749
Lokhandwala; Baker
US6592749
21
2003
6610193
Schmitman
US6610193
17
Pages
33
Year
Patent
2003
6663752
2004
Inventor(s)
Download
Ruggero Santilli
US6663752
US20040202905
Pages
13
2
2004
6673322
Ruggero Santilli
US6673322
41
2004
6689259
Dennis Klein
US6689259
2004
6705425
West
US6705425
12
2004
6712944
US6712944
13
2004
6719817
Marin
US6719817
14
2004
6790324
Chambers (Canada)
US6790324
16
2005
AU-2005100722-A4
(Australian)
2005
AU2005100722
US20050006228
11
2005
6852205
US6852205
50
2005
6911126
Slavchev
US6911126
11
2005
6926872
Ruggero Santilli
US6926872
30
2005
6939449
US6939449
16
2005
6972118
Ruggero Santilli
US6972118
25
WO2005049051
69
2005
2006
7005075
US7005075
12
2006
7014740
Kim (Korea)
US7014740
13
2006
7021249
Christison
US7021249
16
2006
7045042
O'Brien (Canada)
US7045042
10
2006
7067097
Gregory Wojak
US7067097
24
2006
7097676
Wootan; Hawkins
US7097676
10
2006
7125480
Austin
US7125480
10
2006
7144826
US7144826
2007
7160434
Therapeutic
Electrolysis
Becker; Moroney
US7160434
19
34
Year
Patent
2007
2007/0104797
Therapeutic!
2007
7160472
2007
2008
Inventor(s)
Download
Pages
US20070104797
21
US7160472
18
7261062
US7261062
10
GB2446488
GB2446488
2008
US20080234527
18
2008
US20080216906
24
2008
US20080216793
15
water engine
2008
US20080216774
22
2008
US20080209808
14
2008
US20080190383
2008
US20080172928
US20080105218
water as fuel
2008
2008
7412947
US7412947
2008
7318885
Omasa (Japan)
US7318885
65
2008
7459071
Omasa (Japan)
US7459071
31
2011
7932619
Newcomer
US7932619
2012
8101051
Yang (Japan)
US8101051
20
2012
8127750
US8127750
10
2012
HHO Heater
www.water4gas.com/HHO-Heater-Project/
No Patent! Use it freely!
Total pages:
95
movies
2373*
*NOTE: Despite the efforts to make this list complete, it is still partial. If you pull all the
referenced Patents (listed inside the above) from the Patent Bureaus of Japan, France,
Korea, The Netherlands, Australia, Germany, USA, European Patent Office and so forth,
youll end up with 1000s more pages of OFFICIAL PATENTS. If somebody thinks that
Water-Fuel is limited to some amateur movies on YouTube, hes got a surprise coming
35
36
and oxygen into atomic hydrogen and oxygen which on recombination generate an
intensely hot flame.
37
mentioned mixture is passed through an arc causing dissociation of both the hydrogen
and oxygen into atomic hydrogen and oxygen which on recombination generate an
intensely hot flame.
38
bustion characteristics of the gas and a flash arrester 660. Gas generation is controlled
by a main control board 800 in accordance with sensors which measure parameters to
calculate indirectly the gas flowrate and control this in accordance with demand.
39
40
41
42
43
44
against internal explosions and ensures a minimal quantity of explosive gas in the upper
regions of the cells.
45
46
47
48
This is not a typo. A hydrogel is a thick gel that holds many times its weight in trapped water.
It has a number of medical and industrial applications.
49
current, voltage dependant/current limited, potential applied to the plates causes the
hydrogen/oxygen gasses to disassociate from the water molecule. The upper portion of
the container is a hydrogen/oxygen mixture collection chamber for maintaining a
predetermined gas pressure. There is introduced into the hydrogen/oxygen collection
chamber, from a source, a substantial quantity of permanently magnetically polarized
particles. Attached to the gas collection chamber outlet is a non-magnetic, nonconductive closed loop of tubing. The polarized magnetic particles are caused to circulate
in the closed loop tubing by an electrical and/or mechanical pump. A pick-up coil wound
around the tubing will have a voltage induced therein as the magnetic field of the
polarized magnetized gas particles pass therthrough. The induced voltage has utilization
as an electrical power source. In that the hydrogen/oxygen gasses are not polarized the
gasses will seek a pressure release via an outlet. The hydrogen and oxygen gasses may
be utilized such as in a burner system.
50
51
52
53
54
55
external source to power said anode and cathode coils. Once electrolysis starts to occur,
oxygen and hydrogen gas emit and travel towards the top of their respective tanks. As
the respective gases pass their respective valves, they turn their respective turbines,
which enable their respective generators. Once the generators are providing sufficient
power for the anode and cathode coils to perform electrolysis, the external power supply
is disconnected. Oxygen and hydrogen is then stored.
56
57
58
59
The pulsing of the electrode current may in one embodiment be carried out at a rate of
between 5,000 and 40,000 pulses per minute, with a rate of about 10,000 pulses per
minute being preferred. In such an arrangement the current level may be about 220
amps at a duty cycle of about 0.006 and the electrode voltage may be about 3 volts.
Thus there are produced very short, sharp pulses, which have been found to be very
effective in the production of reaction products. Appropriate circuitry is disclosed for
providing a driving signal to the transformer, as well as an arrangement for safely taking
off the reaction products and stopping the process upon sensing of a predetermined
internal pressure.
60
61
62
63
64
dissociation temperature of water. Both the thermal and photolytic effects of the sun's
rays are employed to dissociate water. The hydrogen and oxygen formed upon
dissociation are drawn off and separated.
65
Inventor: Claude Chappelle. Patented #4379043 Waterdecomposition and gas-generating apparatus 1983
Abstract: An apparatus is provided for decomposing water and producing detonating gas
by electrolysis. The apparatus includes a plurality of annular carbon electrodes, which
are concentrically arranged about a common vertical axis. The annular electrodes are
perforated and have upper and lower ends, the lower ends being positioned adjacent to
sealing and insulating elements in order to form a plurality of concentrically-arranged
cells for containing electrolyte, e.g., water. A solid carbon electrode, preferably
cylindrical, is positioned within the smallest concentric electrode and along the common
axis. Apparatus is provided for supplying water to the cells, and for applying a direct
current across the electrodes in order to evolve the detonating gas from the electrolyte
in the cells by electrolysis.
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
A SIMPLIFIED EXPLANATION: In 1929, German and Austrian chemists, Karl Friedrich Bonhoeffer
and Paul Harteck, showed that ordinary hydrogen is a mixture of two kinds of molecules, orthohydrogen and para-hydrogen. The word ortho means straight or upright, and the word para
means beyond, behind or beside. Encyclopedia Britannica further explains that in orthohydrogen, the spins of both its protons (the two particles comprising the core of the Hydrogen
atom) are aligned in the same direction that is, they are parallel. In para-hydrogen, the spins
are aligned in opposite directions and are therefore anti-parallel. The relationship of spin
alignments, described above, determines the magnetic properties of the atoms. In the bottom
line, this affects on the ability of the ortho-Hydrogen atom to interact better with fossil fuel or
bio-fuel. Ortho-Hydrogen clusters together with Oxygen is such a way that it can gain up to 3
times more power over regular HHO.
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
hydrogen generator to pick up and carry the hydrogen gas back to the air intake of the
engine. Both the diesel fuel and water may be preheated to maximize results.
101
102
103
Abstract: A novel fuel pretreater apparatus and method for pretreating an alternate fuel
to render it usable as the fuel source for fuel burning equipment such as internal
combustion engines, furnaces, boilers, and turbines, includes a volatilization chamber
into which the alternate fuel is received. An exhaust plenum may enclose the
volatilization chamber so that thermal energy supplied by exhaust from the fuel burning
equipment can be used to help volatilize the alternate fuel. A bypass stream of exhaust
may be diverted through the alternate fuel in the volatilization chamber to help in
volatilizing the alternate fuel and help carry the volatilized fuel through a heated reactor
prior to its being introduced into the fuel burning equipment. The reactor is preferably
interposed in the exhaust conduit and is formed by a reactor tube having a reactor rod
mounted coaxially therein in spaced relationship. The exhaust passing through the
exhaust conduit provides thermal energy to the reactor to pretreat the alternate fuel.
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
lower heating member. After all, the whole heating members are heated to emit a vast
heat. The heating device according to the present invention is very useful as a heat
source for all brown gas boilers, heaters, heating furnaces and warm air circulators and
can contribute to environmental preservation by making a purified energy, which does
not induce environmental pollution.
112
113
114
115
116
either maintain or prevent fluid communication across the first fluid outlet when the float
is in at least partial contact with the first fluid outlet.
117
118
119
Further down the description it attributes Browns Gas with known ability to create high
temperatures and excite other fuels. Also notice the ratio being recommended at least 60%
Browns Gas:
By way of illustration, one may use Brown's gas in combination with one or more of the
aforementioned hydrocarbon gases in nozzle 101. This gas is well known and is
described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 6,021,915(see note8), the entire disclosure of which is
hereby incorporated by reference into this specification. As is disclosed in such patent,
"The Brown's gas that is used in the present invention is itself a non-explosive mixed
gas that consists of hydrogen and oxygen mixed in a molar volume ratio of 2:1, and it is
obtained by electrolysis of water; and it is known that the combustion thereof causes the
molecular or atomic hydrogen and oxygen to produce heat of the reaction, thereby
bringing about a quite high combustion temperature. In the present invention, the
Brown's gas is combusted by using a torch nozzle and an igniter or the like for producing
an ignition spark, to produce a highly reducing flame of about 2,300C., and preferably
the tip of the flame good in reactivity is brought in contact with the above mixed gas
flow. The number of the Brown's gas combustion burners for bringing the Brown's gas
flame in contact with the above mixed gas flow to combust the mixed gas may be 1 or 2
or more; preferably the Brown's gas combustion burners are used 2 or more, and more
preferably 2 or 3 in number. Thus, the mixed gas is combusted at high temperatures.
This is considered in such a way that the Brown's gas flame heats the mixed gas flow as
well as interacts with active chemical species produced from the fossil fuel in the mixed
gas, to combust the fossil fuel gas to generate a high temperature; this high
temperature causes steam explosion of the moisture in the mixed gas, thereby
8
Thats a typo it should say U.S. Pat. No. 6,012,915 which is also shown in this chapter.
120
combusting it as a hydrogen/oxygen gas flame (Brown's gas flame) at a high speed, and
the flame propagation resulting therefrom leads to combustion throughout the mixed
gas. The speed of the high-speed combustion by this steam explosion is, for example,
about 6.75 times (linear velocity: 2.7 m/s) that of the combustion of propane."
When Brown's gas is used in the process of the invention within nozzle 101, it is
preferred to use at least about 60 volume percent of the Brown's gas and no more than
about 40 volume percent of one or more of the hydrocarbon gases.
121
each cell. A pair of flat crushable metal plates are located at each end of the cell stack;
adjacent a pair of pressure plates that exert axial squeezing pressure to seal the cells.
Specially designed, dual metal-hydride cartridges are used to provide larger quantities of
H2 from a single cartridge; a high temperature metal hydride is provided in a rear region
of the cartridge that is heated by an electrical resistance heater to a temperature of
about 200C. or above while room temperature metal hydride powder fills a front
section of the cartridge.
122
123
124
10
Known as Teflon
125
126
127
128
129
11
Waters located immediately downstream from a hydraulic structure, such as a dam, bridge or
culvert.
130
Inventor: Arthur Morse. Patent 6918350 Sea-based hydrogenoxygen generation system 2005
Abstract: A method for generation of hydrogen and oxygen contained in a salt solution
provides for the disposing a number of wind turbines on navigable collection vessels in
waters distant from shore. The wind turbines have a large number of blades, typically
30, to provide high torque for generating electricity used for extracting said gasses from
the atmosphere by means of electrolysis. The collection vessels are disposed in
predetermined zones, which are changed when weather conditions provide better
collection conditions elsewhere. The gasses are stored in cylinders located both on the
collection vessels, and on storage vessels attached to the collection vessels. After
collection the cylinders are transported to shore facilities for further purification and/or
distribution.
131
Inventors: Nai Sung Chou, Choi Shiu Sum, Chou Te-Hung and Hui
Lin. Patent 6977120 Hydrogen/oxygen generating system
with temperature control 2005
Abstract: A mixed hydrogen-oxygen fuel generator system uses an electrolytic solution
to generate gaseous hydrogen-oxygen fuel through the electrolysis of water. This
generator system includes: at least one electrolytic cell with multiple metallic plates
used as an internal isolation system in which two of the plates separately connect to
132
both the positive and negative terminal of a DC circuit. These plates are used for the
electrolysis of the electrolytic solution in the cell(s) to produce, under pressure, mixed
hydrogen-oxygen fuel. The apparatus also includes a cooling system containing a water
cooling tank in which there are two zones: one is the electrolytic solution circulation coil
and the another is a water circulation zone. The cooler provides the circulating, cooling
water used to adjust the temperature of the operating cell and of the electrolyte solution
to within a given temperature range in order to ensure that the cell is not affected by
excessively elevated temperatures that can stop operations due to cell overheating.
Another effect of this cooling system is to precipitate moisture out of the generated gas
products. The ignition flame temperature of the gaseous fuel produced can be adjusted
for specific applications by passage of the hydrogen/oxygen gas stream through a
temperature-control fluid. Thus, continuous 24 hours operation can be achieved along
with better gas production efficiency and fuel cell energy generation.
133
134
135
136
137
pipe cause the elements to be separated and migrate on separate faces of the roof and
thereafter to an opening which communicates with a conduit for admission of the
elemental components into the engine. A cooling device is employed which utilizes a
portion of the fluid not dispensed into the electrolysis area. Various controls and
monitors are provided to assist in the selective deployment of the hybrid fuel system.
138
Inventor: Shu Lee (Taiwan). Patent 7043918 Environmentfriendly engine system 1992
Abstract: An environment-friendly engine system is characterized by that hydrogen gas
that fuels the engine is generated from water by electrolysis and that the electric power
for electrolysis is supplied by a fuel cell in a water fuel tank and a lead acid cell
connected in parallel with the fuel cell. As the engine system is operating, the fuel cell
burns methyl alcohol or ethyl alcohol to generate power for activating water electrolysis
that produces hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas fuels a hydrogen engine, and the steam
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
12
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
List of desirable therapeutic results of Brown's gas found and demonstrated by the
inventor:
153
154
155
8. Ocular Disease
Patients with ocular diseases such as simple ocular congestion and
afterimage, sties, epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, glaucoma, and
cataract experienced considerable disease improvement effects by
spraying of Brown's gas.
9. Parkinson's Disease
When Brown's gas was sprayed on patients with Parkinson's disease,
considerable improvement in paralysis of limbs, speech disorder,
dribbling by excessive salivation, head shaking, trembling of
hands, etc. was observed.
156
Good sleep.
These effects are attributed to promoted blood circulation by
spraying of Brown's gas, resulting in smooth blood supply to
various regions in the body.
157
158
Non-politically-correct, nothing-held-back
statement from Ozzie Freedom
Dear reader, please observe very closely the BROAD AND DETAILED scientific proof
provided by scientist and inventor Song Doug Kang in the documents referenced
above. This good Korean man made his knowledge freely available to the world in
2004 (which is also the year when he made it known to the US Government via its
Patent Office).
Consider the potential harm to the health of Mankind, and the accumulated suffering
of many patients if this is NOT
accepted at least as an alternative
treatment to all the listed diseases
and pains. In other words, let it be
known and let the patient choose.
Now let me take this a step
further: I am holding the strong
opinion that it would be a SERIOUS
CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY for
anybody to block, criticize or ban
further
FREE
experimentation
aimed at alleviating patients
suffering using this affordable
invention.
Here, I said it. I am not a lawyer
and this is not a legal statement.
Nor is it a medical statement. This
is just my personal opinion. Id let
the patients, their loved ones and
their lawyers speak the rest of
the way.
~Ozzie, April 2011
159
160
Plasma-Electrolytic Cells
Russian Patent 2157861
Device for obtaining thermal energy, hydrogen and oxygen.
Date: 25.11.1998.
The Diagram shows Kanarevs plasma-electrolysis reactor from this Patent.
161
1Reactor housing
2reactor top cover
3anode
4cathode (outlet pipe)
5inlet pipe
6 & 7busings.
162
1 Housing
5 Cap
9 Anode
10 Cathode
13 Magnet.
163
164
165
13
Ozzies note: this is not a typo; Kanarev proves a potential energy gain as mind-boggling as
190322.6% as you will see in a moment. Yes, youre reading it right it says one hundred and
ninety thousand percent.
166
The electrodes of the cell are made of steel. It helps to avoid the phenomena that go together
with the galvanic cell14. Nevertheless, at the cell electrodes a potential difference of nearly
0.1 V takes place in complete default15 of electrolytic solution in it. When the solution is
charged, the potential difference is increased. The positive sign of the charge always appears
on the upper electrode, and the negative sign appears on the lower one. If the direct current
source generates pulses, gas output is increased.
As a laboratory model of the low current electrolyzer cell generates small quantity of gases, a
solution mass change definition method during the experiment and further calculation of
released hydrogen and oxygen is the most reliable method of definition of their quantity.
It is known that a gram atom is equal to the atomic mass of the substance; a gram molecule is
equal to the molecular mass of the substance. For example, the gram molecule of hydrogen in
the water molecule is equal to two grams; the gram-atom of the oxygen atom is 16 grams.
The gram molecule of water is equal to 18 grams. Hydrogen mass in a water molecule is
2x100/18=11.11%; oxygen mass is 16x100/18=88.89%; this ratio of hydrogen and oxygen is
in one liter of water. It means that 111.11 grams of hydrogen and 888.89 grams of oxygen are
in 1000 grams of water.
14
15
Absence.
167
One liter of hydrogen weighs 0.09 gm; one liter of oxygen weighs 1.47 gm. It means that it is
possible to produce 111.11/0.09=1234.44 liters of hydrogen and 888.89/1.47=604.69 liters of
oxygen from one liter of water. It appears from this that one gram of water contains 1.23
liters of hydrogen. Energy consumption for production of 1000 liters of hydrogen is 4 kWh
and for one liter 4 Wh. As it is possible to produce 1.234 liters of hydrogen from one gram of
water, 1.234x4=4.94 Wh is spent for hydrogen production from one gram of water now.
Indices
Amount
6x10=60.0
11.00
0.062
0.020
0.01978
0.220
0.00124
6x50=300.0
0.60
0.06
0.54
9 energy consumption per gram of water passed into gases according to the
readings of the voltmeter and ammeter E=P/m, Wh/gram of water
0.407
0.0023
168
4.94
12.14
2147.8
0.06
2.36
1072.7
190322.6
Judging by the
voltmeter, the
process yields
nearly 11
17
Oscillogram
samples
times more
energy than
is put in
Judging by the
oscilloscope (he
explains why this
is more accurate)
the process
yields 1903
times more
energy than
is put in
Fig. 2: Voltage
16
The energy effectiveness factor (Ee) is defined as a dimensionless ratio that enables the
effectiveness of the conversion of energy from the depletable resource potential form to the final
use form to be expressed.
17
Oscilloscopes screenshot.
169
Fig. 3: Voltage
Fig. 4: Current
Fig. 5: Current
170
=(1/0.001x4.8)=208.3 Hz.
171
Thus, a small value of current 0.02 A and voltage 0.062 V allows us to suppose that in the
low current electrolyzer the water electrolysis process is similar to the process, which takes
place during photosynthesis. At photosynthesis, hydrogen separated from the water molecule
is used as a connecting link during organic molecule formation, and oxygen is released into
the air. At low current electrolysis, both hydrogen and oxygen are released into the air.
Fruitfulness of this attractive hypothesis should be checked not once, but now it is the only
one that gives a satisfactory explanation of an unusual experimental result.
Note: gas release is clearly seen during several hours after the cell is disconnected from the
line.
Conclusion
Energy efficiency index of the low current electrolysis should be refined, but in any case it
will be greater than 10, thats why there is every reason to think that a way to production of
inexpensive hydrogen from water and transition to hydrogen energetics is opened.
172
27 April, 2004
Philipp Mikhailovich Kanarev; V.V. Podobedov; A.I.
Tlishev.
C25B1/04; C25B9/06; (IPC1-7): C25B1/04; C25B9/06
Y02E60/36F
RU20030117806 20030616
RU20030117806 20030616
ABSTRACT
FIELD: physiochemical technologies for production of hydrogen and oxygen
from water.
SUBSTANCE: proposed electrolytic cell has taper housing made from currentconducting material and used as cathode, additional taper electrodes and
taper cover made from current-conducting material and used as anode.
Cylindrical bases of housing, additional electrodes and cover have
circular recesses for dielectric rings. Housing, additional electrodes and
cover are connected by means of bolts inserted into holes in cylindrical
bases. Insulation between anode, additional electrodes and cathode is
insured by dielectric rings, dielectric washers and dielectric bushes.
Solution is fed from reservoir to inter-electrode space through passage.
Gases escape through branch pipe. Proposed cell may be used for
polarization of ions of solution and water molecules in horizontal and
vertical planes, thus forming positive potential on anode and negative
potential on cathode before connecting the cell to electric circuit;
process of separation of gases continues after disconnection of cell from
circuit.
EFFECT: considerable reduction of power requirements for decomposition of
water.
REPLICATION TIPS
(Added by Ozzie)
I couldnt get a copy of the full Patent neither in Russian nor in English. According to
www.rexresearch.com/kanarev/kanarev1.htm it was originally developed under military
umbrella so that could be the reason why. Rex Research stated that this tech has been
replicated successfully. Since the Patent abstract says specifically that it has 1 drawing, I
assume the drawing below must be it according to Kanarevs own articles.
173
In the above drawing you can see some of the dimensions. However, it has come to my
knowledge that the angle I marked in green is a critical measurement (missing from the
Patent). One water-fuel experimenter who replicated Kanarevs Patent in a number of
experiments, was kind enough to share his experimentation and allowed me to publish
its essence. The missing, yet vital piece of information in the Patent was the precise
ANGLE of the electrode structure. The experimenter found that the desired RESONANCE
(rather than brute force electrolysis) only occurs if the slope angle is
51 degrees.
174
Is also important to know that the electrodes (parts 1, 2 and 3 in Kanarevs drawing)
should be CONE SHAPED rather than square-based pyramids. You can experiment with
square pyramids but the CORNERS are problematic: not only are they hard to produce
but also prone to faster corrosion. How to create stainless steel cones? A machinist can
help you figure it out.
The measurements given in the below drawing are per my own calculations please
verify these numbers. The drawing is not so scale and shows how a cone layout may
look like before bending:
At the time of writing, apart from the Patent itself of course, this 51 angle, the cone
shape and the measurements given in the Patent drawing by Kanarev himself are the
only pieces of information I consider critical for replicating this invention. Tweaking the
structure MAY be required in order to get optimal results, but these tips may save you
lots of frustrations and get you closer to the optimum.
The experimenter asked me to add one more remark: there could be other angles and
tweaks of the structure where you would find resonance and/or good overall efficiency.
These tips were found independently without Kanarevs direct assistance.
175
In this
manner, a very
low grade fuel
may be used
and by
properly
setting the
valves, the
proper supply
of gases may
be added to
render the
fuel
thoroughly
combustible.
176
177
GB patent GB364180 from 1930 (Application Dated April 1, 1931, accepted Jan. 7,
1932) Inventor: Rudolf Erren from Berlin, Germany. "Improvements in and relating to
internal combustion engines using a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen as fuel."
US patent 2,183,674 - from Dec. 19, 1939 (filed Sep. 10, 1936). Inventor: Rudolf
Erren. "Internal combustion engine using hydrogen as fuel."
1980 - Charles T. Weber - U.S. Patent 4,344,831 "Apparatus for the Generation of
Gaseous Fuel."
178
In the approved Patent, the inventor says: "The present invention relates to the
generation of gaseous fuel for internal combustion engines, particularly for such engines
which use petroleum products to form explosive mixtures when vaporized in air. It has
long been known that internal combustion engines can be fueled by a mixture of
hydrogen and oxygen as well as by the standard vaporized petroleum products."
"It is preferable that both hydrogen and oxygen be provided in gaseous form to an
internal combustion engine in ready-to-burn form."
"The principal object of the present invention is to provide a method for generating a
hydrogen-oxygen fuel suitable for powering internal combustion engines. Another object
of this invention is to provide apparatus for powering an internal combustion engine
which will reduce polluting emissions into the atmosphere. Another object of this
invention is to provide a means for powering a vehicle utilizing water as one of the basic
sources of energy."
"...apparatus for generating a gaseous fuel useful as a heat source as well as in an
internal combustion engine which is non-polluting, the materials for which are readily
available in all parts of the world."
Australian Patent AU-2005100722-A4 - granted in 2005 by the Australian Patent Office
to Robert Michael Roberts and Chau Kin Nam. Some relate it to the Australian Joe Cell.
In part, it looks similar to the devices filmed experimented by Stanley Meyer.
U.S. Patent 6,048,500, from Apr. 11, 2000 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR USING
HYDROXYL TO REDUCE POLLUTANTS IN THE EXHAUST GASES FROM THE COMBUSTION
OF A FUEL. In this patent hydrogen is separated from oxygen, and both are fed into the
engine.
U.S. Patent 5,863,413 from Jan. 26, 1999, describing another Hydroxyl
Generator feeding the intake manifold of an internal combustion engine for similar
purposes. In this Patent, too, hydrogen is separated from oxygen, and both are fed into
the engine.
U.S. Patent 5,452,688 from Sep. 26, 1995, describing yet another Hydroxyl
Generator feeding the carburetor of an internal combustion engine for similar purposes.
Quoting from the approved and published Patent: "This invention relates to the use of
electrolytic cells which generate a gaseous mixture of hydrogen and oxygen to enhance
the efficient burning of hydrocarbon fuels in internal combustion engines... Internal
combustion engines are known to generate pollutants because of the incomplete burning
of hydrocarbon fuels for power."
179
180
U.S. Patent 5,231,954 from Aug. 3, 1993 HYDROGEN/OXYGEN FUEL CELL. This
Patent depicts in Figures 1-3 a pretty simple Electrolyzer and it states: Use of the
generated gases as a fuel supplement enables substantial increases in fuel efficiency,
while at the same time reducing the emission of pollutants.
181
U.S. Patent 5,143,025 from Sep. 1, 1992 HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN SYSTEM FOR
PRODUCING FUEL FOR ENGINES in which the inventor says: "The present invention has
for its primary object to provide a hydrogen and oxygen gases production system by
electrolysis of water for direct use in an internal combustion engine." He describes not
only his own, but six other U.S. Patents relating the use of hydrogen and oxygen,
generated on board the vehicle from water, to fuel internal combustion engines and
reduce pollution.
U.S. Patent
4,369,737
from Jan. 25, 1983
HYDROGEN-OXYGEN
GENERATOR.
In this Patent the
inventor, Cledith A.
Sanders, says: A
cell for generating
hydrogen and oxygen
comprised of a
plastic housing and a
plurality of regularly
spaced metallic
electrode rods... This
cell finds particular
use as a fuel
generator for internal
combustion engines.
He also mentions
U.S. Patents
3,311,097;
3,980,053; and
4,023,545, and says
that these patents
teach the use of an
electrolytic cell for
making combustible
mixture of hydrogen
and oxygen from
water, and using this
mixture of gases as
fuel for the engine.
182
U.S. Patent
6,257,175 B1 from July 10, 2001 OXYGEN AND HYDROGEN
GENERATOR APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES describes in detail the
use of hydrogen and oxygen as fuel, and the benefits of reduced pollution, and states
that It has long been known.
The Patent says: "Hydrogen and oxygen gases are generated for use in an internal
combustion engine in a vehicle using the electrical system of the vehicle to provide
current for the electrolysis process to generate the hydrogen and oxygen gases. The
electrolysis process to eliminate oxygen and hydrogen gases occurs only while the
engine is being operated and terminates when the engine stops...
It has long been known that the pollution caused by internal combustion engines can be
decreased by the addition of oxygen. As a matter of fact, in recent years the
oxygenating of fuel has been mandated in various states or areas as a means for
decreasing pollution.
At the same time, it has long been known that the burning of hydrogen provides a
source of clean energy, since the combustion of hydrogen results in the formation of
water as a by product. Hence, the use of an electrolysis unit to generate hydrogen and
oxygen gases from water provides two important features, one of which is providing
additional energy from the internal combustion engine and the other of which is
decreasing pollution by the addition of oxygen in the combustion process.
183
(Amerongen,
The
Netherlands);
Gijsbert
Versteeg,
Correspondence address:
Abstract:
Emulsions of mineral automobile fuel, such as gasoline and diesel oil, and containing at
least 77 percent by weight of water, are described as a usable motor fuel. When
vegetable oil is worked into the mixture, the automotive fuel can contain a percentage of
water that can vary over a wide range.
The advantages in using fuel mixtures are lower fuel consumption, lower CO2 emissions,
affordable automobile fuel, and a lengthening of the period for which the increasingly
scarce reserves of mineral oil will be available.
Claims:
1. Emulsions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emulsion] of water and fuel, such as gasoline,
diesel oil, and oil, can be used as fuels in motors, with the characteristic that the water
content is more than 77 percent of the total weight of the emulsion.
2. An emulsified mixture of water, a mineral automotive fuel and a vegetable oil can be
used as an automotive fuel.
184
They suggest between 30% and 60% of water, by weight. Download the complete
formulas from www.freepatentsonline.com/y2004/0121202.html
185
more vegetable oil are also suitable for using as a motor fuel. Assuming that gasoline,
octane, has a carbon content of 82%, this implies that the amount of CO2 emitted by the
mixture is only 324 grams per kilogram of emulsion. This is a 90% reduction of
emissions compared to the use of gasoline alone.
Emulsions that separate can be reconverted to homogeneous fuel by stirring or shaking.
Assuming a mixture of 80% water and 20% gasoline, leads to the estimate that the
engine cylinder pressure can rise to more than 80 kg/cm2. This is higher than the
pressure occurring in normal gasoline engines. However, the ignition temperature is
lower than in gasoline engines.
The advantages in using fuel mixtures are lower fuel consumption, lower CO2 emissions,
affordable automobile fuel, and longer use of the increasingly scarce oil reserves.
address:
186
Abstract (abridged):
A method for use in controllably generating mechanical power from a piston engine
without combusting fuel, wherein the piston engine includes:
a piston;
a first supply means adapted for supplying air in to at least one of the upper and
lower chambers; and
a second supply means adapted for supplying at least one of water vapor and
Hydrogen in to the lower chamber;
---opening the partition valve when the lower chamber is at a relative minimum
volume wherein, the heated air disposed in the upper chamber is released into
the lower chamber via the opened partition valve, and the water vapor and/or
Hydrogen in the lower chamber is caused to expand upon interaction with the
heated air so as to force outward movement of the piston from the cylinder,
whereby the lower chamber is adjusted from the relative minimum volume into
the relative maximum volume.
187
188
BUSINESS USE OF
PATENT INFORMATION
An article by The European Patent Office
(EPO) www.EPO.org
Patent information is
interesting not only because
of its legal and technical
relevance, but increasingly
because of its importance in a
business context. Patent
information provides a wealth
of information for many people
involved in business,
especially corporate decision
makers, investors, managers
and innovators working in research and development.
It can help you to:
monitor trends in technology which will influence your
products,
see which markets your competitors are active in,
identify business opportunities, and
coordinate your business decisions.
189
190
Chapter 6
THE SMOKING GUN
DEFINITION
The term smoking gun originated in the 1893 Sherlock Holmes story, The Gloria Scott.
It was and still is a reference to an object or fact that serves as conclusive evidence of a
crime or similar act. Additionally, its meaning has evolved in uses completely unrelated
to criminal activity: for example, scientific evidence that is highly suggestive in favor of
a particular hypothesis is sometimes called smoking gun evidence.
Its name originally came from the idea of finding a smoking (i.e., very recently fired)
gun on the person of a suspect wanted for shooting someone, which in that situation
would be nearly unshakable proof of having committed the crime. [Source: WikiPedia]
191
QUESTION #1
- Has all this water-fuel technology been known?
Wait, let me focus the question a bit further:
- Has it been known to whoever was supposed to know?
ANSWER
Document Title: On-Board Hydrogen Generator for a
Partial Hydrogen Injection Internal Combustion Engine
Obtain from: http://www.sae.org/technical/papers/740600
Author: John Houseman; D.J. Cerini
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Published: 1974 by the Society of Automotive Engineers; SAE Preprint 740600
This document describes hydrogen generation from gasoline, not water. However, they
tested the effects of supplemental hydrogen on combustion efficiency and stated:
192
This Smoking Gun document, as well as many other documents presented to you
below, demonstrate a severe failure in communication: our auto engineers have
known the benefits of supplemental hydrogen since the early 1970s yet those
benefits are still unknown to most drivers today.
QUESTION #2
- Why havent they spoken?
ANSWER
- They have! We just havent been listening...
In the next chapters you will be able to see a wealth of documentation by scientists and
automotive engineers, telling us about hydrogen and water fuel. You will be able to
easily see how many times and for how many years the scientists and
engineers have been telling us about the many aspects of this tech, and the many
evidences of its validity.
193
Chapter 7
SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE
ENGINEERS PAPERS
WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?
The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) is a huge organization with over 120,000
members! Between the many famous members of the past, youll find names like Henry
Ford, Thomas Edison and Orville Wright. According to WikiPedia, today more than a
quarter of the Society's membership is from outside of North America.
The list below is a collection of references found in official SAE publications of the past
36 years. Today the website that publishes SAE magazines, for SAE members, is
http://www.sae.org/mags/aei/
The links below allow the download of each technical paper. The SAE charges $15 for
each download ($12 for SAE members). The abstract of each document should tell you if
it is of any interest to you.
194
has very wide combustion limits to enable SI [spark-ignited] engine operation under very
dilute conditions (either ultra-lean or with heavy EGR concentrations). In previous
publications, we have presented engine dynamometer results showing very low
emissions with bottled reformate. This paper shows the sensitivity of engine emissions
and performance to operating near the dilute limit with H2 enrichment using both
bottled reformate and an actual reformer prototype. It discusses the additional
advantages of the system for supplemental heating to the passenger compartment and
the vision of substantially increasing powertrain efficiency - by using a solid oxide fuel
cell (SOFC) APU as the source of reformate.
195
required amount of recirculated exhaust gas has been made and the energy efficiency of
the reactor has been calculated. The produced and the required amount of hydrogen
have also been calculated. A stationary test engine using the system is presented. The
results show a potential for very low pollutant emissions with an increased energy
efficiency compared to that of a conventional engine.
196
Abstract:
The addition of hydrogen-rich gas to gasoline in an Internal Combustion Engine seems to
be particularly suitable to arrive at a near-zero emission Otto engine, which would be
able to easily meet the most stringent regulations. In order to simulate the output of an
on-board reformer that partially oxidizes gasoline, providing the hydrogen-rich gas, a
bottled gas has been used. Detailed results of our measurements are here shown, such
as fuel consumption, engine efficiency, exhaust emissions, analysis of the heat release
rates and combustion duration, for both pure gasoline and blends with reformer gas.
Additionally simulations have been performed to better understand the engine behavior
and NOx formation.
Results show that: When running at =1 and without EGR, addition of hydrogen-rich gas
produces a significant shortening of the very first phase of combustion (inflammation
phase) rather than of the remaining combustion process; Addition of hydrogen-rich gas
allows to run the engine at extremely high or EGR rate; When running at the highest
possible or EGR (limited by COV increase) the duration of all phases of combustion
remains almost unaffected by the diluents; In all conditions a significant decrease of
UHC and NOx emissions has been observed; In all conditions a significant increase of
engine efficiency has been measured, which seems to be enough to compensate and
overcome the losses due to the partial oxidation of Gasoline in the Reformer.
197
easily meet future stringent regulations. Bottled gas was used to simulate the output of
an onboard reformer (21% H2, 24% CO, 55% N2). Measurements were carried out on a
4- stroke, 2-cylinder, 0.5-liter engine, with EGR, in order to calculate the heat release
rate through a detailed two-zone model. A quasi-dimensional model of the flame was
developed: it consists of a geometrical estimate of the flame surface, which is then
coupled with the heat release rate. The turbulent flame speed can then be inferred. The
model was then applied to blends of gasoline with hydrogen-rich gas, showing the effect
on the flame speed and transition from laminar to turbulent combustion. Comparison
between the quasi-dimensional model and the conventional Metgalchi-Keck + Damkhler
model gave a general validation for gasoline operation and suggested a modification of
the usual time-delay function for transition from laminar to turbulent flame. Results give
new insight in previous findings from the heat release calculation: the effect of
hydrogen-rich gas addition on flame speed is predominant in the early phase of the
flame propagation, and the effect of the high curvature of the flame at the onset of
combustion, compensated by the high mass diffusivity of hydrogen, is believed to be the
physical reason to such behavior.
198
electrolysis products. It was found that the effects of hydrogen addition (is equivalent
to?2.8% of the fuel by mass, is equivalent to 60% by volume) decreased as the fuel/air
equivalence ratio approached = 1. When operating at 0.8, the torque, indicated
mean effective pressure (imep) and NO emissions increased and cycle-to-cycle variation
decreased with hydrogen addition. The improvements in engine performance and
increase in NO emissions were related to a faster burn rate shown by a decrease in burn
duration with the addition of hydrogen. Further, the addition of hydrogen only and
hydrogen and oxygen in a ratio of 2:1 were compared. The extra oxygen had little effect
on engine performance other than an increase in NO exhaust concentration ~500 ppm.
Under the conditions tested, the power necessary to generate the hydrogen on board
through electrolysis was greater than what was gained from the engine.
199
experimental work at Ghent University, is given in the present paper, to clarify some
contradictory claims and ultimately to provide a comprehensive overview of the design
features in which a dedicated hydrogen engine differs from traditionally fueled engines.
Topics that are discussed include abnormal combustion (backfire, pre-ignition and
knock), mixture formation techniques (carbureted, port injected, direct injection) and
load control strategies (power output versus NOx tradeoff). Attention is given to the
most recent research by car manufacturers BMW and Ford, reporting hybrid control
strategies (PFI+DI, lean burn + stoichiometric operation using EGR) to obtain power
outputs equivalent to gasoline engines with extremely low emission levels. Recent
results from experiments with EGR on a hydrogen engine at Ghent University are also
given. Finally, a synthesis of hydrogen engine design features is given, that makes the
most of hydrogen's advantages and counter its disadvantages. Areas requiring further
research are highlighted.
200
201
202
Abstract:
Hydrogen is expected to be one of the most important fuel in the near future to solve
greenhouse problem and to save conventional fuels. In this study, a Direct Injection (DI)
diesel engine was tested for its performance and emissions in dual-fuel
(Hydrogen/Diesel) mode operation. Hydrogen was injected into the intake port along
with air, while diesel was injected directly inside the cylinder. Hydrogen injection timing
and injection duration were varied for a wider range with constant injection timing of
23 Before Injection Top Dead Centre (BITDC) for diesel fuel. When hydrogen is used as
a fuel along with diesel, emissions of Hydro Carbon (HC), Carbon monoxide (CO) and
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) decrease without exhausting more amount of smoke. The
maximum brake thermal efficiency obtained is about 30 % at full load for the optimized
injection timing of 5 After Gas Exchange Top Dead Centre (AGTDC) and for an injection
duration of 90 crank angle. The NOX emission tends to reduce to a lower value of 888
parts per million (ppm) at full load condition for the optimized injection timing of 5
AGTDC and with an injection duration of 90 compared to neat diesel fuel operation.
____________________________________________________________________
203
oxygen to carbon ratios. Tests have also been carried out to evaluate the effect of the
addition of a microplasmatron fuel converter generated gas in a 1995 2.3-L fourcylinder SI production engine. The tests were performed with and without hydrogen-rich
gas produced by the plasma boosted fuel converter with gasoline. A one hundred fold
reduction in NOx due to very lean operation was obtained under certain conditions. An
advantage of onboard plasma- boosted generation of hydrogen-rich gas is that it is used
only when required and can be readily turned on and off. Substantial NOx reduction
should also be obtainable by heavy exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) facilitated by use of
hydrogen-rich gas with stoichiometric operation.
204
Chapter 8
NASA RESEARCH
DECLASSIFIED
DOCUMENTATION
Document Title:
Hydrogen-Enrichment-Concept
Preliminary Evaluation
Author: Ecklund, E. E.
NASA Center: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Published: December 15, 1975
[Source:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19770015346_1977015346.pdf]
Abstract:
A hydrogen-enriched fuels concept for automobiles is described and evaluated in terms
of fuel consumption and engine exhaust emissions through multicylinder (V-8)
automotive engine/hydrogen generator tests, single cylinder research engine (CFR)
tests, and hydrogen-generator characterization tests. Analytical predictions are made of
the fuel consumption and NOx emissions which would result from anticipated engine
improvements. The hydrogen-gas generator, which was tested to quantify its
thermodynamic input-output relationships was used for integrated testing of the V-8
engine and generator.
205
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?N=0&Ntk=all&Ntx=mode%20matchall&Ntt=Onboard%2
0hydrogen%20generation%20for%20automobiles
Abstract:
Problems concerning the use of hydrogen as a fuel for motor vehicles are related to the
storage of the hydrogen onboard a vehicle. The feasibility is investigated to use an
approach based on onboard hydrogen generation as a means to avoid these storage
difficulties. Two major chemical processes can be used to produce hydrogen from liquid
hydrocarbons and methanol. In steam reforming, the fuel reacts with water on a
catalytic surface to produce a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. In partial
oxidation, the fuel reacts with air, either on a catalytic surface or in a flame front, to
yield a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. There are many trade-offs in onboard
hydrogen generation, both in the choice of fuels as well as in the choice of a chemical
process. Attention is given to these alternatives, the results of some experimental work
in this area, and the combustion of various hydrogen-rich gases in an internal
combustion engine.
_____________________________________________________________________
206
207
208
Chapter 9
NON-GOVERNMENT
SCIENTISTS
Document Title: Onboard Generation of Hydrogen-Rich
Gaseous Fuels - A Review
Authors: Y. Jamal; M.L. Wyszynski
School of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering
University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Published: September 1993
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy - Vol.19, No.7, pp. 557-572, 1994,
http://home.weblung.org/meyer/onboardh.htm
Abstract:
Hydrogen has a good potential as an alternative fuel for spark ignition engines. It can
extend the lean flammability limit of conventional fuels in order to achieve higher
thermal efficiency and lower exhaust emissions. This paper reviews the use of hydrogen
and hydrogen-enriched gasoline as a fuel for SI [spark-ignited] engines and the techniques
used to generate hydrogen from liquid fuels such as gasoline and methanol, on-board
the vehicle. The processes of thermal decomposition, steam reforming, partial oxidation
and exhaust gas reforming are evaluated. A considerable amount of both theoretical and
experimental work has been done in this field. Predictive and experimental results of the
various investigators are reviewed and summarized.
The lean burning conditions give possibilities for very low CO emissions.
209
210
are: On-board reforming for emission control with internal combustion engines (ICE)
Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) for auxiliary power, heat and hydrogen generation.
Abstract:
Experiments were carried out to evaluate the influence of the addition of hydrogen
oxygen mixture (obtained from electrochemically decomposed water) to the inlet air of a
single cylinder direct injection diesel engine. Addition of hydrogen to the intake or
delivery into the cylinder of diesel engine can improve combustion process due to
superior combustion characteristics of hydrogen in comparison to conventional diesel
fuels. Presented paper describes the dynamometer test results of a study where a small
amount of hydrogen-oxygen mixture, produced by hydrogen-oxygen generator is added
to the intake of a diesel engine.
211
9 %, leading to a NOx emission level of 28ppm (0.13 g/bhp-hr NO). The spark ignition
energy reduction testing found that spark energy could be reduced 22% (from 151 mJ
supplied to the coil) with 13% (LHV H2/LHV CH4) hydrogen supplementation, and even
further reduced 27% with 17% hydrogen supplementation, with no reportable effect on
NOx emissions for these conditions and with stable engine torque output. Another
important result is that the combustion duration was shown to be only a function of
hydrogen supplementation, not a function of ignition energy (until the ignitability limit
was reached). The next logical step leading from these promising results is to see how
much the spark energy reduction translates into increase in spark plug life, which may
be accomplished by durability testing.
Abstract:
An investigation was made to determine whether a sufficient amount of hydrogen could
be efficiently burned in a compression-ignition engine to compensate for the increase of
lift of an airship due to the consumption of the fuel oil. The performance of a singlecylinder four-stroke-cycle compression-ignition engine operating on fuel oil alone was
compared with its performance when various quantities of hydrogen were inducted with
the inlet air. Engine performance data, indicator cards, and exhaust gas samples were
obtained for each change in engine operating conditions.
212
different types of fuel cells and hybrid electric vehicles. Based on Phase 3 and 4 Ballard
fuel cell buses, the system descriptions and maintenance procedures focus on protonexchange-membrane (PEM) fuel cells for heavy-duty transit applications. The PEM fuel
cell engine is the most promising for automotive applications; its transit application is
the most advanced.
213
214
interest in the industrial and academic community in terms of the anticipated potential
of these fuel mixtures to improve part-load efficiency and cold start pollutant emissions
in internal combustion engines. Of particular relevance in this context is the dependence
of unsteady turbulent flame propagation speed, EGR tolerance, lean limit extension, NOx
formation and wall quenching distance on varying percentage content of H2 in the fuel
mixture.
215
216
217
218
Between the engine manufacturers was generally approved that the increased
combustion temperatures and the minimal duration of the combustion process were
causing the formation and emission of Nitric Oxide pollutants. This was especially
evident at the Diesel cycle engines where the compression and supercharging pressure
increase was followed by a proportional increase of the NOx emissions. As a result of the
above, the engine manufacturers have to compromise between performance and
emissions, so they produce engines that cannot operate at the maximum temperature
pressure conditions while in the same time they have to utilize exhaust catalytic
oxidation devices in order to achieve fully oxidized emissions. However both researchers
and manufactures consider the present status as the threshold of the present engine
design and they try to introduce less conventional methods in the design and
manufacturing process in order to by-pass the emissions barrier. This is the first step
for this new era of engine design in the Hydrogen Enhanced Combustion, which
promises multiple improvements in power production, efficiency and emissions.
219
Chapter 10
COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENTS
RONN MOTORS
www.RonnMotors.com
Eddie Alterman of Men's Journal Magazine described this car as God's Own Super Car.
The Scorpion car has 450 HP, while maintaining 40 MPG. Its built-in hydrogen-ondemand system extends the cars fuel economy by 20-40%, and increases the engines
torque by up to 10%.
Ronn Motors, a small but determined auto maker out of Horseshoe Bay, Texas, used the
professionally designed hydrogen-on-demand system H2GO to boost their super-car
design to higher heights of both performance and fuel economy. In my humble opinion,
Ronn Motors has made larger automakers realize that HHO car is an unavoidable reality,
and I'm sure they are watching and planning when and how to jump into the game.
220
These tests have proven not just that Water4Gas works, but also that HHO
in small quantities generated by very simple DIY installations can go a
long way.
The savings in direct expenses (at the pump) and indirect expenses (long
term lowered maintenance, clean oil that needs no change, etc.), have been
calculated by the truck owners/operators to cover their very-low-investment
(roughly $200-$300 in information plus hardware) in a matter of days.
221
The photo above shows the 6-cell Water4Gas system installed on the truck (inside the
blue milk crate near the engine). The truck is a Kenwood 1999, with a Detroit 12.7 liter
turbo diesel engine. Blankenship reported that the engine felt like new with
Water4Gas, although it had over 1 million miles on it (the engine was built in 1994)!
The interviews and the technology adaptations from Young were fully organized and
exposed in the Water4Gas Diesel Report which is available for download at
www.Water4Gas.com
As promised to my students, the first version of the book has been released on
6/9/2009 to 140,000 readers and subscribers. The second version of the book was
released in February 2010 to over 160,000 subscribers.
222
So far the public liked this publication, and it is expected to hit many more waves in the
next few years, due to the combination of several factors:
1. The enforcement of strict emissions regulations enforces truckers to install
expensive emission control systems or buy new trucks.
2. Since the entire US economy is down, the trucking industry is suffering with
everybody else.
3. The combined effect of the above factors force smart truckers to place their
business on hold because they see that every mile on the road the truck
actually loses money. Other owner-operators cannot see the long-term losses
and continue to drive themselves to oblivion. These conditions threaten the
health of our entire economy.
223
for
224
UNSOLICITED REPORTS
I had nothing to do with the above press exposure, other than publishing the
information in my books. These guys, independently, found the information on
Water4Gas.com, built their own systems and then somehow contacted local TV stations
with their success stories.
60% water,
2% (secret) acids.
The company's name is CMC Israel Haber Lerner Ltd., And their sister/sponsor company
in the USA is called Clean Motors Corporation. The company operates two websites
(http://www.cmclerner.com and http://clean-motors.com) that, at the time of writing,
only talk about powerful fuel additives but not this liquid water-fuel mixture. Patent
applications registered to these companies (that are available online) reveal some of
their inventions but, again, not this one and definitely not the secret ingredients that
hold the key to the fuel mix.
However, the company scientists were filmed by Israeli TV (Channel One) and the
Russian channel RTV1, demonstrating the system on a Israeli van. Below are excerpts
related to the articles:
Dr. Moshe (Lev) Lerner, Director of Clean Motors Corporation: These components make
hydrogen. It is 60 percent water, 38 percent Methanol and two percent
acid.
First and foremost (the system enhances) the quality of the environment.
It reaches 80 to 90 percent of cleaning of toxic gas. It means a full
combustion. Secondly, (it provides) more energy up to 40 percent. Thirdly,
it can work with all types of petrol.
225
the
that
then
less
As I said, they are not the only R&D company who have
developments of that nature. However, reportedly the
company's innovation was to use micro-computers to
control and optimize the technology. They were quoted to
say that the result is an environmental-friendly, cleaner
and fully automatic fuel system which increases the
engine's power and acceleration. On their YouTube video I
saw a short road test, vividly demonstrating the resulting
engine power boost.
It was also reported on the Internet that the system was being sold in the USA and
Australia for about $1,200 dollars, but this is not reflected in their official websites.
226
227
Do the math for 10 days its 17,280 gallons costing a fortune even if you are in the
oil business!
When my student came with his team to the actual oil field, they had some bad
surprises. The voltage theyve been promised, instead of 24 volts, was measured to be
only 19 volts. There were some other non-optimal conditions, but he was determined to
install the cell and test it anyway. They conducted several test runs and measured the
fuel economy. The results were averaged from several runs, and it was found that fuel
economy of the generator went up by 11.11% which is not bad at all for a first day
under less-than-perfect conditions.
Now calculate how many gallons they could have saved if the entire drilling session was
done with HHO. My calculation shows a savings of 1,919 gallons. If it only costs them
half of what I'm paying in California for diesel fuel, this means savings of $3,000!
For one drilling session! How much could they save in a year in just ONE oil site? How
much in a year in all their sites across Texas? Who knows... but it far exceeds the cost
of a simple Electrolyzer plus installation, don't you think?
The story is not over yet, but the point is clear water-fuel is the friend of every
petroleum company, whether they want to use it to assist drilling or refining or
transporting the product to the gas station. Better yet, why not all of those?
228
Therefore, ALL oil companies big and small have a mutual interest in the development of
water-fuel in all its applications, because:
1.
We still need and use their gasoline and diesel fuel, as well as plastic and
other byproducts of fossil fuel;
2.
They need to cut costs and enhance profitability, now that they are facing
inevitable competition from wind, solar, bio-fuel and electrical/hybrid.
So, if you are an oil company executive, examine water-fuel technology with a
magnifying glass. All that is needed is a relatively small shift in your point of view.
Water-fuel is NOT the enemy.
Before the end of this year, I would like to see this book on the desk of every executive
of every petrol manufacturing, refining and transportation company. And some sort of
action taken to help their profitability and for the environment too, of course.
229
Chapter 11
TIMELINE OF HYDROGEN
TECHNOLOGY
The timeline of events laid down below is made of data from WikiPedia.org and the
Energy Research and Development Authority of the New York Government
www.nyserda.org; edited to highlight just a few of the many water-fuel events in
modern history. This list is by no means complete or fully accurate, and the serious
researcher must verify the data with other more complete sources. This timeline is only
intended to give an overall perspective of the history of hydrogen. Additionally, it does
not focus exclusively on hydrogen as fuel for engines.
1625 - First description of hydrogen by Johann Baptista van Helmont. First to use
the word "gas."
1650 - Turquet de Mayerne obtained by the action of dilute sulphuric acid on iron
a gas or "inflammable air."
1672 - "New Experiments touching the Relation between Flame and Air" by
Robert Boyle.
1700 - Nicolas Lemery showed that the gas produced in the sulfuric acid/iron
reaction was explosive in air.
1783 - Antoine Lavoisier gave hydrogen its name (Gk: hydro = water, genes =
born of). Antoine Lavoisier and Pierre Laplace measured the heat of combustion
of hydrogen using an ice calorimeter.
230
1783 Jacques Alexander Cesar Charles, a French physicist, launched the first
hydrogen balloon flight. Known as Charliere, the unmanned balloon flew to an
altitude of three kilometers see drawing below.
Only three months later, Charles himself flew in his first manned hydrogen
balloon.
1784 - Jean-Pierre Blanchard, The first trial with a dirigible hydrogen balloon.
231
1789 - Jan Rudolph Deiman and Adriaan Paets van Troostwijk using an
electrostatic machine and a Leyden jar for the first electrolysis of water.
1800 English scientists William Nicholson and Sir Anthony Carlisle discovered
that applying electric current to water produced hydrogen and oxygen gases. This
process was later termed electrolysis. Johann Ritter also decomposed water
into hydrogen and oxygen by electrolysis with a voltaic pile.
1806 - Franois Isaac de Rivaz build the first internal combustion engine powered
by a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen.
1809 - Thomas Foster observed with a theodolite the drift of small free pilot
balloons filled with "inflammable gas."
1820 - W. Cecil wrote a letter "On the application of hydrogen gas to produce a
moving power in machinery."
Download: http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/DesignOffice/projects/cecil/cecil.pdf
1839 - Christian Friedrich Schnbein published the principle of the fuel cell in the
"Philosophical Magazine."
1839 - William Robert Grove developed the Grove cell, the first fuel cell (which he
called the gas voltaic battery).
232
1849 - Eugene Bourdon invented the Bourdon gauge which enabled accurate
gas pressure/vacuum measurement.
1866 - August Wilhelm von Hofmann invents the Hofmann voltameter for the
electrolysis of water.
1873 - Thaddeus S. C. Lowe - Water gas, the process used the water gas shift
reaction.
1874 - Jules Verne in his fiction book The Mysterious Island, wrote:
for steamers
1884 - Henry M. Paine's patents a process to "tweak" the HHO gas (then called
luminance gas because it was used for lamps) produced by electrolysis so that
it mimics the burn of fossil fuel, allowing it to be used in fossil fuel-fired
appliances.
1884 - Charles Renard and Arthur Constantin Krebs launch the airship La France.
233
1889 - Ludwig Mond and Carl Langer coined the name fuel cell and tried to
build a device running air and Mond gas - industrial coal gas.
1896 - Leon Teisserenc de Bort carries out experiments with high flying
instrumental weather balloons.
1897 - Paul Sabatier facilitated the use of hydrogenation with the discovery of
the Sabatier reaction.
1898 - James Dewar collected solid hydrogen for the first time. He liquefied
hydrogen by using regenerative cooling and his invention, the vacuum flask at
the Royal Institute of London.
1900 - Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin launched the first hydrogen-filled Zeppelin
LZ1 airship.
234
1909 - Count Ferdinand Adolf August von Zeppelin made the first long distance
flight with the Zeppelin LZ5.
1910 - The first Zeppelin passenger flight with the Zeppelin LZ7.
1910 - Fritz Haber patented the Haber process (producing ammonia using
hydrogen gas; a very important process).
1912 - The first scheduled international Zeppelin passenger flights with the
Zeppelin LZ13.
1918 - Charles Frazer, an Ohio inventor, patented a hydrogen booster which used
electrolysis to increase vehicle power and fuel efficiency while greatly reducing
exhaust emissions.
1919 - The first Atlantic crossing by airship with the Beardmore HMA R34.
1920's German engineer Rudolf Erren invented the Erren Engine and
converted the internal combustion engines of trucks, buses, and submarines to
use hydrogen or hydrogen mixtures. Patented in Britain in 1930 (GB Patent
364180) and in 1936 in the USA (US Patent 2,183,674).
1923 in a talk given in Cambridge, British scientist and Marxist writer, J.B.S.
Haldane, foreseeing the exhaustion of coal for power generation in Britain,
proposed a network of hydrogen-generating windmills. This is the first proposal
of the hydrogen-based renewable energy economy. In his 1924 essay Daedalus;
or, Science and the Future Haldane wrote: There will be great power stations
where during windy weather the surplus power will be used for the electrolytic
decomposition of water into oxygen and hydrogen.
1926 - Partial oxidation, Vandeveer and Parr at the University of Illinois used
oxygen in the place of air for the production of syngas.
1926 - Umberto Nobile made the first flight over the north pole with the
hydrogen airship Norge
1929 - Paul Harteck and Karl Friedrich Bonhoeffer achieve the first synthesis of
pure parahydrogen.
235
1937 After ten successful trans-Atlantic flights from Germany to the United
States, the Hindenburg, a dirigible inflated with hydrogen gas, crashed upon
landing in Lakewood, New Jersey. The mystery of the crash was solved in 1997:
A study concluded that the explosion was not due to the hydrogen gas, but
rather to a weather-related static electric discharge which ignited the airship's
silver-colored, canvas exterior covering which had been treated with the key
ingredients of solid rocket fuel. Now you know: it wasn't a hydrogen disaster!
236
1938 - Igor Sikorsky from Sikorsky Aircraft proposed liquid hydrogen as a fuel.
1939 - Hans Gaffron discovered that algae can switch between producing oxygen
and hydrogen.
1955 - W. Thomas Grubb modified the fuel cell design by using a sulphonated
polystyrene ion-exchange membrane as the electrolyte
1957 - Pratt & Whitney's model 304 jet engine using liquid hydrogen as fuel
tested for the first time as part of the Lockheed CL-400 Suntan project.
1957 - The specifications for the U-2, a double axis liquid hydrogen semi-trailer
were issued.
237
1966 - Slush hydrogen, a combination of liquid hydrogen and solid hydrogen, for
use as a lighter weight rocket fuel.
1967 - Akira Fujishima discovers the HondaFujishima effect which is used for hydrolysis in the
photoelectrochemical cell.
1970 - John Bockris or Lawrence W. Jones coined the term hydrogen economy.
1970 Electrochemist John O'M. Bockris coined the term hydrogen economy
during a discussion at the General Motors (GM) Technical Center in Warren,
Michigan. He later published Energy: the Solar-Hydrogen Alternative, describing
his envisioned hydrogen economy where cities in the United States could be
supplied with energy derived from the sun.
238
1973 The OPEC oil embargo and the resulting supply shock suggested that the
era of cheap petroleum had ended and that the world needed alternative fuels.
The development of hydrogen fuel cells for conventional commercial applications
began.
1974 National Science Foundation transfers the Federal Hydrogen R&D Program
to the U.S. Department of Energy. Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu of the University
of Miami, FL, organized The Hydrogen Economy Miami Energy Conference
(THEME), the first international conference held to discuss hydrogen energy.
Following the conference, the scientists and engineers who attended the THEME
conference formed the International Association for Hydrogen Energy (IAHE).
1978 - Archie Blue, a New Zealand inventor, patented and demonstrated in public
an under-the-hood water fuel device.
1979 - HM7B rocket engine, a gas generator rocket engine fed with liquid oxygen
and liquid hydrogen. Powered the third stage of the Ariane 1.
1984 - Stanley Meyer ran a dune buggy on water instead of petrol. He replaced
the spark plugs with "injectors" to spray a fine mist of water into the engine
cylinders, subjected to an electrical resonance.
1988 The Soviet Union Tupolev Design Bureau successfully converted a 164passenger TU-154 commercial jet to operate one of the jet's three engines on
liquid hydrogen. The maiden flight lasted 21 minutes.
1989 Cold fusion first announced when Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann
from the University of Utah reported producing nuclear fusion in a tabletop
experiment involving electrolysis of heavy water on a palladium electrode.
1989 The National Hydrogen Association (NHA) formed in the United States
with ten members. Today, the NHA has nearly 100 members, including
representatives from the automobile and aerospace industries, federal, state, and
local governments, and energy providers. The International Organization for
Standardization's Technical Committee for Hydrogen Technologies was also
created.
1990 The Hydrogen Technical Advisory Panel (HTAP) was mandated by the
Matsunaga Act to ensure consultation on and coordination of hydrogen research.
Work on a methanol-fueled 10-kilowatt (kW) Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM)
fuel cell began through a partnership including GM, Los Alamos National
Laboratory, the Dow Chemical Company, and Canadian fuel cell developer,
Ballard Power Systems.
239
1990 The world's first solar-powered hydrogen production plant at SolarWasserstoff-Bayern, a research and testing facility in southern Germany, became
operational. The U.S. Congress passed the Spark M. Matsunaga Hydrogen,
Research, Development and Demonstration Act (PL 101-566), which prescribed
the formulation of a 5-year management and implementation plan for hydrogen
research and development in the United States.
1994 Daimler Benz demonstrated its first NECAR I (New Electric CAR) fuel cell
vehicle at a press conference in Ulm, Germany.
1997 - Anastasios Melis discovered that the deprivation of sulfur will cause algae
to switch from producing oxygen to producing hydrogen.
1997 Retired NASA engineer, Addison Bain, challenged the belief that hydrogen
caused the Hindenburg accident. The hydrogen, Bain demonstrated, did not
cause the catastrophic fire but rather the combination of static electricity and
highly flammable material on the skin of the airship. German car manufacturer
Daimler-Benz and Ballard Power Systems announced a $300-million research
collaboration on hydrogen fuel cells for transportation.
1998 German Navy's submarine Type 212, powered by hydrogen fuel cells.
1998 Iceland first unveiled a plan to create the first hydrogen economy by
2030 with Daimler-Benz and Ballard Power Systems.
2000 Ballard Power Systems presented the world's first production-ready PEM
fuel cell for automotive applications at the Detroit Auto Show.
240
2003 - Roy McAlister published the book The Solar Hydrogen Civilization
carrying the subtitle The Future of Energy Is the Future of Our Global Economy.
2003 President George W. Bush announced in his 2003 State of the Union
Address a $1.2 billion hydrogen fuel initiative to develop the technology for
commercially viable hydrogen-powered fuel cells, such that the first car driven
by a child born today could be powered by fuel cells.
2005 - Dr. Ruggero Maria Santilli's patented the Magnegas generators, which
use an underwater carbon arc to produce a non-polluting combustible gas.
2006 Bill and Tom Lang revolutionized the water-fuel industry by developing a
simplified experimental hydrogen-oxygen generator.
2006 Ozzie Freedom created the logo Water4Gas, and duplicated the Langs
technology in order to release it broadly to as many worldwide public as possible,
as fast as possible. He opened up the international experimenters club
Water4Gas and delivers the technology as Public Domain, from Day 1, to every
new member.
2007 Based on the experimenters club feedbacks and Ozzies own home-based
experimentation, Water4Gas technology evolved and widened, allowing more
gains for more vehicles, boats and trucks. The Water4Gas books, first published
broadly in August 2007, accelerated a worldwide discussion about the validity of
water-fuel, leading to a proliferation of businesses established exclusively for
further research, promotion and
delivery of water-fuel technology to
the worldwide market.
241
2009 The debate about the validity of water-fuel technology heats up, fueled by
the ignorance of those who negate it. To answer ignorance with knowledge, Ozzie
Freedom decided to release new informational books such as this one, to educate
the public about the solid scientific basis of water-fuel technology.
2011-2012 Water4Gas expands into HHO home heaters. Check out the DVD
and real systems available at www.Water4Gas.com
242
Here are the changes I predict for the near future (believe in it and it WILL happen):
19
Smog tests dont fail you for having installed water-fuel of ANY type.
Usually defined as model, ideal, mold, form, example, pattern. But in other words it could be
defined as school of thought.
243
Water-fuel starts to be used on many more than just cars. The list of applications
is long, but the technology (actually technologies - see patents) can definitely
make a big difference in: tag boats, cruise ships, commercial marine liners and
oil tankers, airplanes (a major consumer of petroleum , see below), navy
and other military/police applications, hospital and other emergency generators,
remote areas generators, farm equipment, heating, cooking, factories and much
more.
244
According to Airlines.org,
in 2007 jet fuel
consumed was 25
BILLIONS of gallons in
the USA, and 78
BILLIONS of gallons
globally.
The U.S. Airforce
consumes only 2.5
BILLIONS of gallons of
jet fuel per year.
Make a 10% dent in any
of these numbers, and
youve enhanced national
economy with many
billions of dollars PER
YEAR. We can feed and educate a few more kids with that, cant we?
Future Vision for the next 40 years, by the Energy Research and Development
Authority (New York State): In the future, water will replace fossil fuels
as the primary resource for hydrogen. Hydrogen will be distributed via
national networks of hydrogen transport pipelines and fueling stations. Hydrogen
energy and fuel cell power will be clean, abundant, reliable, affordable and an
integral part of all sectors of the economy in all regions of the U.S.
Swan in fuel...
[photo: USDA.gov]
Let's look at one more future factor that is beyond the scope of this book. The example
of making a significant change in the energy industry can now be transformed or
exported into other industries such as health, housing, nutrition and anything else
you can think of that needs improvement in your country and in your area of expertise.
A good example and good inspiration are worth more than gold.
Again, all we need to do to make it happen is first and foremost believe in our dreams.
THEN comes action.
245
246
NEW
Chapter 12
HHO HEATER PROJECT
Written by its developers
developers, Tim and Scotty; edited by Ozzie to fit this boo
ok
Please help support our efforts by purchasing one of our DVD's and you to will
understand how this heater works.
Order from
http://www.water4gas.com/HHO
http://www.water4gas.com/HHO-Heater-Project/
Project/ Order from
247
248
249
Based on this kWh price assumption, an HHO Heater using 300 watts would use about
$32.40 in electricity per month if run continuously.
Order from
http://www.water4gas.com/HHO-Heater-Project/ Order from
250
Depending how you put your system together you may need more or less of some of
these items. Always check back with us for updates.
Order from
http://www.water4gas.com/HHO-Heater-Project/ Order from
Water4gas has been a long time supporter of its membership efforts to advance and
forward HHO technology. This HHO Heater Project is the result of much dedication and
251
hard work from fellow enthusiasts Tim and Scotty. Below is some information about
what they set out to do and, as we expand into yet another area of application for HHO
use, we are promoting their efforts with a Water4Gas DVD Special Edition.
Order from
http://www.water4gas.com/HHO-Heater-Project/ Order from
About Us
We are not HHO Experts. By no means. We have just taken the technology to the next
level. When no one else did At our expense and our time. This is a fully automatic
System that does work. We are probably viewed as just another backyard builder by
those that dont know us. But those who have seen our system running, or have been
following us, know differently. We have released these videos to prove for one we are
not greedy and getting others to see how we built ours and give them a chance to
improve the technology. We want more than anything to just open the eyes of those to
who may never have known about this type of technology using HHO. Your SUPPORT of
this project is directly helping us to present our HHO water heater prototype, and our
larger scale home designs. THANK YOU AND Water4Gas FOR YOUR CONTINUED
SUPPORT!!!!
252
"Yes you may use my remarks Please do! I am very pleased with
your approach both by your technical detail and your business
method.
"Good information at a good value = good business.
I look forward to the whole house system."
- Jeff H.
Order from
http://www.water4gas.com/HHO
http://www.water4gas.com/HHO-Heater-Project/
Project/ Order from
253
254
255
Step 1 - This Video Shows you the smoker unit we purchased to house all of the
components of the HHO heater.
Step 2 - Explaining the second bubbler This was for looks only and you can use what
ever you wish for your second bubbler.
Step 12 - Installing
g the 24v up to temp relay.
Step 16 - Installing a main 4 square electrical switch box with a 12v amp
am guage
installed.
256
Step 17 - Wire installation from the main socket to switch box and from 12v power
supply to main switch box.
Step 18 - Installing the 120v wires for the 120-24v transformer, from transformer to
main switch box.
Step 19 - Installing the 120v hot and neutral wire from the main switch box to the
dimmer to feed the Shurflow pump.
Step 20 - Installing the dimmer switch for the pump. Neutral wires.
Step 22 - Ground wire instalanation from dimmer and pump to terminal block.
Step 24 - Crimp ends on black and red wires. More wiring information.
Step 25 - Main switch box, terminating black, 120v wires from pump dimmer switch and
12v power supply red wire from primary relay.
Step 34 - Tubing coil installation, tube coil installed in 4" pipe and mounted in top of
cabinet.
Step 35 - Installation of hoses to tube coil, front hose on tube coil to outlet side of
pump, back hose on tube coil to bottom of cell.
Step 36 - Explanation of cap on second bubbler, flashback arrestor and solenoid valve
hose from cap to flashback to solenoid.
Step 37 - Installation of cap on second bubbler, flashback arrestor and solenoid valve.
Step 41 - 12v DC wires from power supply, yellow wire 12v pos.
257
Step 48 - Mounting thermal disc snap switch on other side of the heat exchanger.
Step 50 - Explanation of glycol block separate of heat exchanger and 1/8" x 3/8" barb
fitting, install heat exchanger.
Step 51 - Torch assy, .030 mig tip flattened to make the hole smaller, torch designed to
fit our system.
Step 55 - Install to heat exchanger, install heat exchanger with bracket in system
centering torch tip with center of heat exchanger.
Step 62 - Wiring spark box, orange wire with spade terminal on each end.
Step 63 - Wiring spark box, blue wire to connect to left side of spark box.
Step 65 - Explanation of t-stat, long probe to sense temp, installing bracket in front of
sparker.
258
Step 75 - Wiring secondary. relay, white wire from top right on secondary relay to snap
switch on back side of the heat exchanger.
Step 76 - Wiring snap switch, 2nd terminal on back snap switch to bottom right terminal
of primary relay.
Step 82 - Installing cap on second bubbler. and explaining the water level
Step 88 - Final check on all electrical components... also check all plumbing.
Step 90 - Cycle system 2-3 times to purge all air from water lines.
Step 91 - Check all fittings, connections and check for any water leaks and fix.
Step 92 - Starting system, leak test lines with soapy water, turn t-stat on, bleed air from
gas lines.
Order from
http://www.water4gas.com/HHO-Heater-Project/ Order from
259
Chapter 13
RESOURCES
Activism
1. Use the Water4Gas DVD Set for making your own DIY systems education as
well as educating others: www.Water4Gas.com/Books-DVDs/
2. Water4Gas referral program: www.Water4Gas.com/Send-Us-A-Referral
3. Use the book The SCIENCE behind Water4Gas to educate others with scientific
truth rather than rumors.
Popular Products
NEW
ScanGauge-II: www.scangauge.com/products/
And the mechanical Fuel Economy Gauge:
www.amazon.com/s/ref=bl_sr_automotive?_encoding=UTF8&node=15684181&field-brandtextbin=Sunpro
Other Products
260
Dear Reader,
I hope you have enjoyed reading my book as much as I have enjoyed researching and
writing it. Enjoy the benefits of this exciting technology and stay tuned for news.
Yours,
Ozzie Freedom
Founder
Water4Gas
www.WATER4GAS.com
NEW
261