2 3

2 3

Form 120.03*
7
4
(

SRA

25
MAI

SRPA

6
(
7
4
(

Associate Member

SRA

MAI

SRPA

Associate Member

#
4

25

-89: 4
& 4& ;

2
-

<4

54 # 3
8
&
8
&

&

5;

=
&

#
$

>

-89: 4
& 4& ;?- &;
& #
#

&

/8-

$#

# %

# !

#
#

2 & # #

@
#

A#

!
&

"
' ()*+ +, -

"

&

!
./

#
#

$%
0

*++1

&

&

*++1

2 3
- A# 4

2 3

-- C 7

4& 7

&-

8 $%
8
=

# !

2 Hypothetical Conditions: $
# #

# #

Extraordinary Assumptions: $
#
%

##

#
D

&

5
%

*(*$ %

# #

# #

4 # # $8-44
%

4 26 &E
#

"
5

-#

#
# # #

# #

" #

"

Scope of Subject Property Inspection / Data Sources Utilized Approaches to Value Developed
#
4
#
;
#
#
#
#
#
F
#
#
#
-#
4
#
- #
#
- #
-

!
!

#
#

(
#

#
#

#
5

#
#

#
#

!
!

#
#

-#
- #

&

#
#

!
!
!

6 "

!
&

#
#

-#

"
' ()*+ +, -

"

&

!
./

$%

$%
0

*++1

&

&

*++1

2 3
- A# 4

7 &E

2 3

&

/;
--

Location
8
&

Built Up
8 *GH
*GHIJGH
! JGH

Growth
&
-

Neighborhood Single Family Profile

4#
/
?
4
7 "

Supply & Demand Value Trend

#
9 #
! #

Neighborhood Land Use

)2

H
H =#
H

Typical Marketing Time

8 ,7
,IK7
! K7

Neighborhood Name:

H 4
8
H
H

/;
--

8
Zoning/Deed Restriction
<

Site Similarity/Conformity To Neighborhood

-L
=
#
2!
#
#
/
#
/
2!
Utilities
# #
C
6
-

4
4
4
4

4!
4!
4!
4!

9- 88

L
(#

Off Site Improvements

4 #
4 #
"
4 #
/
4 #

#
#
#
#

?C?-

/
/

!
M&
;
8"
#
& !
;
C
&
@
B

/;
-8

!
&

"
' ()*+ +, -

"

&

!
./

$%
0

*++1

&

&

*++1

2 3
- A# 4

2 3

=/8

Site Valuation Methodology

Sales Comparison Approach:
!

!
>

Alternative Method: $

#
#

! #

! #

#
F

# !

COMPARISON 1

$
$

COMPARISON 2

$
$

A
C

A
A

COMPARISON 3

$
$

$
H
H$

A
A

$
$

$
H
H$

A
A

$
H
H$

& # #

Opinion of Site Value

!
&

SUBJECT

45
- A#
- # B
= #
4#
4# B
/ #
- -L
- =
!

!
A
!

#
#

Site Valuation
ITEM

#
"

Market Extraction:

#
#

"
' ()*+ +, -

$
"

&

!
./

$%
0

*++1

&

&

*++1