Model Project For Civil Engineering

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.
com
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTICOMPLEX
BUILDING AT TIRUNELVELI
ht
A DESIGN PROJECT REPORT
tp
Submitted by
NAME
REG . NO
://
REG . NO
NAME
REG . NO
NAME
REG . NO
an
NAME
of
ci
na
in partial fulfilment for the award of the degree
BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING
vi
IN
l.b
CIVIL ENGINEERING
XXXXX COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,
lo
CHENNAI - 6
gs
ANNA UNIVERSITY: CHENNAI 6
t.i
po
ANNA UNIVERSITY: CHENNAI
DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
ht
Certified that this project report DESIGN OF MULTICOMPLEX

BUILDING is the bonafide work of
NAMES who carried out the project
tp
under my supervision.
an
://
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
SUPERVISOR
Civil Engineering
Civil Engineering
na
HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
College of Engineering
XXXXXXXXXXXX
ci
XXXXXXXXXXX
College of Engineering
l.b
vi
Submitted to the viva voce held at XXXXXXXXXXXXX COLLEGE OF
lo
ENGINEERING on..............................
po
gs
INTERNAL EXAMINER
EXTERNAL EXAMINER
t.i

CONTENTS
PAGE NO
INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Objectives
Analysis of framed structure
Design of structures
Slab
Beam
Column
Footing
an
://
tp
ht
PLAN, ELEVATION AND SECTION
Ground floor plan

First floor plan
Second floor plan
Third floor plan
Fourth floor plan
Fifth floor plan
Sixth floor plan
Seventh floor plan
l.b
vi
ci
na
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
ANALYSIS OF MULTISTOREY FRAME
DESIGN
4.1 Design of slab
4.3 Design of column
CONCLUSION
REFERENCE
54
61
62
40
t.i
4.4 Design of footing
35
po
4.2 Design of beams
19
gs
lo
3.1 Frame analysis
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
tp
ht
LIST OF DRAWING
Plan
II.
Elevation
an
://
I.
Section
IV.
Slab detailing
V.
Beam detailing
VI.
na
III.
Column detailing
VII. Footing detailing
l.b
vi
ci
LIST OF TABLES
Beam maximum bending moments
II.
Beam maximum shear forces
III.
Column maximum axial forces
IV.
Column maximum bending moments
lo
I.
t.i
po
gs
://
tp
ht
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
na
an
We thank the almighty for his kind guidance all throughout the tenure of
this work
ci
Dr.S.Joseph Sekhar
vi
We take this opportunity to express our thanks to our beloved principal

M.E., Ph.D
and our correspondent Rev.Fr.Jesu Marian for
l.b
their co-operative guidance and encouragement.
lo
We are extremely grateful to our beloved H.O.D, civil Engg, and
gs
Dr.S.Carmel Jawahar M.E., Ph.D for his help and encouragement.
po
We owe greatest debt of gratitude to our beloved guide Er.J.Sherin Nisha M.E
t.i
for her technical idea for the well completion of this project.
We sincerely acknowledgement thanks to our entire teaching and nonteaching staff members.
na
an
://
tp
ht
ABSTRACT
ci
vi
This report discusses on the Design of a Multicomplex building. This project

mainly includes the analysis and design of the building. The load conditions as
l.b
per code IS456 are assumed. The slab and beams are designed for bending,
shear and deflection limit.
lo
The plan, Elevation, Section and Reinforcement retails are drawn in AutoCAD.
2000.
gs
The analysis made in STADD Pro. Designs are made manually by using IS 456:
was done for the structural elements as per SP 3.
po
Design is carried out manually and it is based on IS 456- 2000. And detailing
t.i
Concrete grade of M20 and steel HYSD bars of grade Fe415 are used. Safe
Bearing Capacity of soil is taken as 180KN/m2. Footing is designed as Circular.
Plan and detailing are enclosed in this report.
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
A
- Total area
Ast - Area of tensile reinforcement
- Overall depth of beam or slab
- Effective depth of beam or slab
B.M - Bending moment
- Modular ratio
R.M - Resisting moment
t.i
Leff - Effective span of beam, slab or column
po
gs
Asc - Area of compression reinforcement
lo
l.b
vi
SYMBOLS

- Characteristic strength of steel
- Shear force
ht
fy
Modules of section
tp
cbc - Permissble stress in concrete in bending compression

st - Permissble stress in tensile steel
://
fck -
Chracteristic strength of concrete
an
Breadth of footing
L -
Length of footing
Pu -
Ultimate load
W -
Total load
v - Normal shear stress
c - Permissble shear stress

Ac - Area of concrete
- Diameter of steel
Dead load
LL -
Live load
t.i
po
WL - Wind load
gs
DL -
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
B -

CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
GENERAL
tp
ht
1.1.
Soils having low bearing capacity are found in several parts of the world.
In Tamilnadu also low bearing capacity soil occur in many parts. The
://
basic problems associated with these types of deposits are low shear
an
strength and high compressibility. Whenever poor soil conditions are at

site such as, loose sand, soft clay, highly organic deposit or dumped
heterogeneous material are encountered the following are the alternatives
na
to overcome the problems.
ci
i.
Avoid the site by relocating the proposed structure at a site with
ii.
vi
better soil conditions.
Adopt a foundation system that recognizes the inadequacies of the
l.b
soil and transfers load to it in a manner that the inadequacies are

unable to cause any harm to the superstructure
Adopt a foundation system that by-passes the poor soil and
lo
iii.
transfers the load from the superstructure to better soil located from
gs
below the poor soil.

iv.
Improve or modify the properties of the soil either by excavating
po
the poor quality soil and replacing it with soil having better
engineering properties or by in-situ treatment without excavation
t.i
these processes are known as ground improvement or ground

modification.
Due to growth of population and scarcity of land, construction of

structures in poor soil is unavoidable.
1

1.2.
GROUND IMPROVEMENT AND MODIFICATION
The terms ground improvement and modification refer to the
ht
improvement or modification to the engineering properties of the soil so

that soil posses properties that are acceptable to us for the proposed civil
tp
engineering activity. The improved or modified soil exhibits satisfactory
://
performance when foundations, earth retaining structures are constructed

on within or using the soil.
an
The term Ground improvement means a permanent or long term
na
improvement and the term Ground modification means a temporary or

short term modification effected for the construction stage only.
Improvements in soil behaviour required are listed below.
ci
An increase in the bearing capacity.
ii.
A reduction in the amount of settlement and on the time in which it

occurs.
l.b
vi
i.
An increase in the capacity to retard seepage.
iv.
Acceleration in the rate at which drainage occurs.
v.
Elimination of the possibility of liquefaction.
vi.
An increase in the suitability of a slope or a vertical cut or an
lo
iii.
IMPROVEMEND BY MIXING WITH ADDITIVES
t.i
1.3.
po
gs
underground opening.
There are various methods of modification that are possible to
achieve improvement in soil properties. Of all the available
methods, improving the properties by mixing with additives such

as
2
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
1.1
OBJECTIVES
To prepare drawings for the building.
t.i
po
gs
The objectives of project are
To analyse and Design a multi-storeyed building of eight storey.
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
lo
1.2 ANALYSIS OF FRAMED STRUCTURE
gs
The method by which multicomplex building frames resist horizontal
po
or lateral forces depends on how the structures has be laid down or planned to
bear these loads.
t.i
1.2.1 METHODS OF ANALYSIS

Analysis of the whole frame by using STADD Pro.
4

1.2.1 a. MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS
tp
ht
The magnitude of bending moments in beams and columns respectively
depend upon their relative rigidity. Generally the beams are made of the same
://
dimensions in all the floors, while the dimensions of column vary from storey to
storey. Columns have smallest dimensions at the top and largest dimensions at
an
bottom, due to this the ratio of the rigidity of the beam to that of the column is
larger in the upper floors than in lower floors. Beam in all floors are made of the
na
same dimensions and provided with same amount of steel, only one substitute
frame may be sufficient when placed in a position in the structure for which the
lo
l.b
vi
ci
B.M is largest.
1.2.1 b. MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT IN COLUMNS
gs
po
The bending moment in columns increases with increase in their
rigidity. Hence they are largest in the lower storeys, and smallest in upper
storey. The maximum compressive stress in columns is found by combining
t.i
maximum vertical loads with the maximum bending moments.

1.3. DESIGN OF RCC STRUCTURES
ht
Reinforced cement concrete members can be designed by one of the
following methods.
tp
a) Working Stress method
://
b) Limit state method
an
1.3.1 LIMIT STATE DESIGN
na
Limit state method of design is based on the plastic theory.

Partial safety factors are used in this method to determine the design
ci
loads and design strength of materials from their characteristic values.

The design aids to IS: 456 published by the Bureau of Indian Standards
vi
made by the design by limit state method very simple and hence this
l.b
method is being widely used in practice.
This method gives economical results when compared with the
lo
conventional working stress method.
gs
1.3.2. WORKING STRESS METHOD
po
This is conventional method adopted in the past in the design of

R.C structures.
t.i
It is based on the elastic theory in which the materials, concrete and

steel, are assumed to be stressed well above their elastic limit under
the load.

1.4. SLABS
ht
Slabs are the primary members of a structure, which support the

supporting elements such as beams, walls, columns etc.
A slab is a thin flexural member used in floors and roofs of
://
tp
imposed loads directly on them and transfer the same safely to the
structures to support the imposed loads.
an
CLASSFICATION OF SLAB
na
Solid slab
Hollow slab or voided slab
lo
l.b
vi
ci
Ribbed slabs
t.i
po
gs
7

1.5. BEAM
A beam has to be generally designed for the actions such as
ht
bending moments, shear forces and twisting moments developed

by the lateral loads.
and generally kept uniform throughout its length.
://
tp
The size of a beam is designed considering the maximum B.M in it

IS 456:2000 recommends that minimum grade of concrete should
an
not be less than M20 in R.C works.
na
1.5.1. BREADTH OF BEAM
ci
It shall not exceed the size of the supports. Generally the breadth
of a beam is kept as 1/3 to 2/3 of its depth.
vi
l.b
1.5.2. DEPTH OF BEAMS
lo
The depth of the beam is to be designed to satisfy the strength and

stiffness requirement.
recommended in IS456:2000
gs
It also satisfy sufficient M.R. and deflection check as
po
For preliminary analysis purpose over all depth of beam may
assumed 1/10 to 1/12 of clear span for simply support 1/7 to 1/5
t.i
for continuous and cantilever beam.

1.6. COLUMN
Members in compression are called column and struts.
ht
The term column is reserved for members who transfer loads to

Classification of column, depending slenderness
://
tp
the ground.
a. Short column
an
b. Slender column
a. Short column
na
IS 456:2000 classifying rectangular columns as short when ratio of
ci
the effective length (Le) to the least dimensions less than 12. This
ratio is called slenderness ratio of the column.
l.b
vi
b. Slender column
lo
The ratio of Le to the least dimensions is greater than 12 is called

slender column.
gs
End conditions
Effective length factor

-
0.65L
2. One end fixed-one end hinged
0.80L
3. Both end hinged
1.00L
4. One end fixed one end free
2.00L
t.i
po
1. Both end fixed

1.7. FOOTING
Foundation is the bottom most but the most important component
ht
of a structure.
stability of the structure.

Foundation provide for R.C columns are called column base.
na
an
://
tp
It should be well planned and carefully to ensure the safety and
1.7.1. BASIC REQUIREMENT OF FOOTING
ci
vi
a. It should withstand applied load moments and induced reactions.

b. Sufficient area should be providing according to soil pressure.
l.b
Footings carry two different loads then it should plan carefully.
lo
1.7.2. TYPES OF FOOTING
gs
a. Isolated base/footing
po
b. Combined footing
c. Strap footing
t.i
d. Solid raft footing

e. Annular raft footing
10

2.1. GROUND FLOOR PLAN
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
11

2.2. FIRST FLOOR PLAN
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
12

2.3. SECOND FLOOR PLAN
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
13

2.4. THIRD FLOOR PLAN
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
14

2.5. FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
15

2.6. FIFTH FLOOR PLAN
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
16

2.7. SIXTH FLOOR PLAN
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
17

2.8. SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
18

ELEVATION
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
19

SECTION X-X
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
20

ANALYSIS OF MULTISTOREY FRAME
ht
3.1 FRAME ANALYSIS
To:
From:
an
://
tp
STAAD.Pro Report
Date:
Copy
to:
02/11/2011 Ref: ca/ Document1

12:11:00
ci
na
Job Information
l.b
vi
Engineer
23-Oct-11
SPACE FRAME
Number of Nodes
1674 Highest Node
1676
Number of Elements
4158 Highest Beam
4158
Number of Combination Load Cases
10
21
Number of Basic Load Cases
t.i
po
gs
Structure Type
Approved
lo
Name:
Date:
Checked

Included in this printout are data for:
ht
Included in this printout are results for load cases:

L/C
Combination
Name
combination load case 5
://
tp
Type
Number
Name
seismic load
wind load
dead load
live load
l.b
Combination Load Cases
vi
ci
1
2
3
4
na
an
Basic Load Cases
Combination L/C Name
Primary
combination load case 5
Primary L/C Name
Factor
lo
Comb.
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
t.i
po
gs
seismic load
dead load
live load
1.50
1.50
22
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
23
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
My 889.644kN-m:1m Mz 889.644kN-m:1m 1 SEISMIC LOAD
24

BEAM
Beam Maximum Moments
ht
Distances to maxima are given from beam end A.
tp
Beam
Node
A
Length
(m)
d
(m)
L/C
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
://
3930
1491
an
3931
425.281
Max +ve
10.000
-1.615
5.000
-215.180
Max -ve
0.000
2.319
10.000
436.108
Max +ve
10.000
-2.414
5.000
-199.390
Max -ve
0.000
0.346
10.000
407.302
Max +ve
10.000
-0.484
5.000
-200.438
Max -ve
0.000
1.062
10.000
413.841
Max +ve
10.000
-0.936
5.000
-200.359
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
10.000
409.856
Max +ve
10.000
Max -ve
0.000
Max +ve
10.000
Max -ve
0.000
1.502
Max +ve
10.000
-1.548
-1.350
5.000
-200.002
1.781
10.000
406.231
-1.755
5.000
-200.051
10.000
5.000
401.913
25
1.461
t.i
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
0.000
po
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
gs
1497
10.000
lo
3936
1496
1.979
l.b
3935
1495
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
Max Mz
(kN-m)
0.000
vi
3934
1494
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
d
(m)
Max -ve
ci
3933
1493
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
na
3932
1492
Max My
(kN-m)
-200.180

3937
ht
3938
1498
1499
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
5:COMBINATI
10.000 ON LOAD
CASE 5
0.000
1.301
0.000
399.014
Max +ve
10.000
-1.305
5.000
-200.352
Max -ve
0.000
1.429
0.000
403.629
Max +ve
10.000
-1.627
5.000
-214.118
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
Max -ve
t.i
po
gs
26

Beam Maximum Shear Forces
tp
3930
Node
A
1491
Length
(m)
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
://
1493
na
3932
1492
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
Max +ve
1495
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
231.850
10.000
-246.749
0.000
237.406
10.000
-241.198
0.000
236.109
-0.200
10.000
-242.490
0.000
236.978
0.000
-0.473
0.000
-0.083
Max -ve
0.000
0.000
-0.281
-0.354
Max -ve
Max +ve
27
10.000
-241.621
0.000
237.693
10.000
-240.906
0.000
-0.305
0.000
238.530
10.000
-240.069
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
0.000
t.i
1497
0.000
po
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
Max +ve
3936
-247.742
-0.359
gs
1496
10.000
0.000
Max -ve
Max +ve
3935
230.857
l.b
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
Max +ve
3934
0.000
vi
1494
Max Fy
(kN)
Max -ve
Max +ve
3933
d
(m)
Max -ve
ci
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
Max Fz
(kN)
Max -ve
Max +ve
an
3931
d
(m)
L/C
lo
ht
Beam

3937
1498
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
Max +ve
ht
3938
1499
-0.261
Max -ve
Max +ve
0.000
-0.306
239.523
10.000
-239.081
0.000
243.199
10.000
-235.400
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
5:COMBINA
10.000 TION LOAD
CASE 5
0.000
0.000
t.i
po
gs
28

COLUMN
Beam Maximum Moments
ht
Distances to maxima are given from beam end A

.
tp
Beam
Node
A
Length
(m)
://
1
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
an
d
(m)
L/C
-25.159
Max -ve
3.500
39.379
0.000
97.025
Max +ve
0.000
-21.942
3.500
-4.218
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
3.500
1.359
0.000
107.504
Max +ve
0.000
-3.188
3.500
-5.854
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
3.500
53.052
3.500
168.181
0.000
-152.967
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
3.500
35.748
Max +ve
0.000
-46.405
3.500
-39.973
Max -ve
3.500
2.081
0.000
79.087
Max +ve
0.000
-1.714
3.500
Max -ve
3.500
56.325
3.500
29
-53.491
0.000
73.210
-51.438
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
0.000
t.i
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max +ve
po
375
0.000
Max Mz
(kN-m)
187.455
gs
1039
231
Max +ve
d
(m)
3.500
lo
562
191
45.798
l.b
522
189
3.500
vi
520
43
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
ci
43
na
Max My
(kN-m)
166.002
1041
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
377
tp
ht
1081
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
417
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
1559
377
561
na
an
://
1225
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
0.000
-54.858
0.000
-169.227
Max -ve
3.500
27.518
0.000
32.105
Max +ve
0.000
-24.766
3.500
-31.219
Max -ve
3.500
1.473
0.000
57.030
Max +ve
0.000
-0.394
3.500
-59.893
Max -ve
3.500
27.518
0.000
32.105
Max +ve
0.000
-24.766
3.500
-31.219
Max -ve
3.500
59.396
3.500
166.500
0.000
-58.365
0.000
-177.914
3.500
32.583
0.000
20.869
-28.549
3.500
-32.916
0.000
46.108
ci
Max +ve
Max +ve
563
vi
1561
Max -ve
l.b
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max +ve
603
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
lo
1601
Max -ve
3.500
32.583
Max +ve
0.000
-28.549
3.500
-32.916
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
3.500
61.939
3.500
168.501
Max +ve
0.000
-60.918
0.000
-186.126
20.869
30
0.000
t.i
747
3.500
po
2079
563
0.740
gs
1745
0.000
-58.906
Max +ve
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
0.000

2081
ht
2121
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
749
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
789
://
tp
2265
749
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
an
935
3.500
37.176
0.000
14.355
Max +ve
0.000
-34.141
3.500
-32.551
Max -ve
0.000
1.547
0.000
36.501
Max +ve
3.500
-0.418
3.500
-55.096
Max -ve
3.500
37.176
0.000
14.355
Max +ve
0.000
-34.141
3.500
-32.551
Max -ve
3.500
64.558
3.500
174.454
Max +ve
0.000
-62.687
0.000
-194.580
3.500
41.438
0.000
7.323
0.000
-38.002
3.500
-26.356
2.644
0.000
24.854
3.500
-44.675
ci
2601
933
na
2599
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
vi
Max +ve
3.500
Max -ve
3.500
41.438
0.000
7.323
Max +ve
0.000
-38.002
3.500
-26.356
Max -ve
3.500
64.685
3.500
184.871
Max +ve
0.000
-62.594
0.000
-199.406
Max -ve
3.500
47.700
0.000
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max +ve
31
-0.398
t.i
1121
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
0.000
po
3121
1119
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
gs
3119
935
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
lo
2785
975
l.b
2641
5.545
3161
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
1161
tp
ht
3305
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
1121
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
3641
1305
1307
na
an
://
3639
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
0.000
-39.571
3.500
-14.102
Max -ve
0.000
6.338
0.000
18.375
Max +ve
3.500
-1.343
3.500
-26.546
Max -ve
3.500
47.700
0.000
5.545
Max +ve
0.000
-39.571
3.500
-14.102
Max -ve
3.500
103.950
3.500
340.859
Max +ve
0.000
-62.252
0.000
-193.960
Max -ve
3.500
72.529
0.000
14.721
0.000
-34.631
3.500
-24.154
0.000
13.873
0.000
30.317
-14.354
3.500
-44.532
0.000
14.721
ci
Max +ve
Max +ve
1347
vi
3681
Max -ve
l.b
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max +ve
1307
5:COMBINAT
3.500 ION LOAD
CASE 5
Max -ve
lo
3825
3.500
72.529
gs
Max +ve
3.500
0.000
-34.631
3.500
-24.154
t.i
po
32

Beam Maximum Axial Forces
ht
Beam
tp
1
Node A
Length
(m)
3.500
://
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
43
189
Max -ve
0.000
4.44E 3
3.500
3.500
Max -ve
0.000
7.65E 3
0.000
7.32E 3
0.000
3.9E 3
0.000
6.86E 3
Max +ve
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
Max +ve
ci
520
3.500
na
43
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max Fx
(kN)
Max +ve
an
d
(m)
L/C
Max -ve
vi
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max +ve
191
3.500
l.b
522
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
562
231
3.500
Max -ve
0.000
6.4E 3
gs
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
lo
Max +ve
Max +ve
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
Max +ve
1041
377
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
0.000
3.35E 3
0.000
t.i
375
po
1039
0.000
5.49E 3
3.04E 3
Max +ve
1081
417
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
33
Max -ve

Max +ve
1225
377
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
ht
0.000
3.04E 3
0.000
2.79E 3
0.000
2.54E 3
0.000
4.57E 3
0.000
2.54E 3
0.000
2.24E 3
Max +ve
561
1561
3.500
563
3.500
an
3.500
563
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
3.500
Max -ve
Max +ve
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
Max +ve
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
l.b
747
3.500
Max -ve
vi
2079
Max -ve
Max +ve
ci
1745
603
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
na
1601
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max +ve
://
tp
1559
Max +ve
749
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
lo
2081
Max -ve
0.000
2.04E 3
gs
Max +ve
2121
789
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
749
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
0.000
Max +ve
933
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
34
Max -ve
0.000
1.68E 3
2599
2.04E 3
t.i
2265
3.66E 3
po
Max +ve
0.000

Max +ve
2601
935
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
ht
0.000
1.53E 3
0.000
2.75E 3
0.000
1.53E 3
0.000
1.12E 3
0.000
1.02E 3
0.000
1.83E 3
Max +ve
975
2785
3.500
935
3.500
an
3.500
1121
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
3.500
Max -ve
Max +ve
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
Max +ve
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
l.b
1161
3.500
Max -ve
vi
3161
Max -ve
Max +ve
ci
3121
1119
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
na
3119
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max +ve
://
tp
2641
Max +ve
1121
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
lo
3305
Max -ve
0.000
1.02E 3
gs
Max +ve
3639
1305
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
1307
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
0.000
507.947
0.000
915.875
Max +ve
1347
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
35
Max -ve
3681
t.i
3641
551.286
po
Max +ve
0.000

Max +ve
3825
1307
3.500
5:COMBINATION
LOAD CASE 5
Max -ve
0.000
507.947
ht
Max +ve
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
t.i
po
gs
36

DESIGN
ht
4.1. DESIGN OF SLAB
tp
DATA:
://
SLAB - B C1, C12,C B2
an
Size of floor = 5m x 10m
Materials M20 concrete and Fe415 HYSD bars
na
PERMISSIBLE STRESSES
ci
cbc = 7 N/mm2 (from IS456:2000 table 21)
vi
st = 230 N/mm2(from table 22)
lo
Q = 0.91
l.b
For M20 concrete;
j = 0.90
gs
m = 13.33
po
TYPE OF SLAB
LY / Lx = 10 / 5 = 2
t.i
Two-way slab
37

DEPTH OF SLAB
(from IS456:2000 page no.39 cl.24.1)
ht
Span / overall depth = L/D = 35 x 0.8 = 28
tp
5000 / 28 = 178 mm
Adopt Overall depth = 180 mm
://
D = 180 mm
an
Effective depth, d = D C /2
Adopt , d = 155 mm
l.b
Effective span is the least of;
vi
ci
na
EFFECTIVE SPAN
Centre to centre of supports = 5 + 0.23 = 5.23m
(ii)
Clear span + effective depth = 5 + 0.155 = 5.155 m
(iii)
Le = 5.155 m
lo
(i)
Self weight = 0.18 x 1 x 25 = 4.5 KN/m2
Floor finishes
= 0.75 KN/m2
Total load
= 6.75 KN/m2
38
= 1.5 KN/m2
t.i
Live load
po
gs
LOAD CALCULATION

BENDING MOMENT
Ly/Lx = 10 / 5 = 2
ht
x = 0.118
(from IS456:2000 table 27)
://
tp
y = 0.029
Mx = x x W x lx2
an
= 0.118 x 6.75 x 5.1552
= 21.13 KN.m
na
My = y x W x lx2
lo
l.b
CHECK FOR DEPTH
vi
= 5.19 KN.m
ci
= 0.029 x 6.75 x 5.1552
Effective depth required, de = M/Qb
= 152 mm
Depth provided
Depth required
t.i
Hence safe
po
gs
= 21.13 x 106 / 0.91 x 1000
39

REINFORCEMENT
ht
Reinforcement in shorter span;
tp
Ast = Mx / st jd
://
= 21.13 x 106 / 230 x 0.9 x 155
= 658.56 mm2
an
Spacing = 1000 x ast / Ast
na
= 1000 x (10/2) / 658.56
= 119 mm
ci
Adopt 10mm dia. Bars @ 120 mm spacing
vi
Reinforcement in longer span
lo
l.b
Ast = My / st jd
= 5.19 x 106 / 230 x 0.9 x 155
Spacing = 1000 x ast / Ast

= 1000 x (10/2) / 161.75
= 485 mm
Adopt 10mm dia. Bars @ 300 mm spacing
40
t.i
po
gs
= 161.75 mm2

Reinforcement detailing
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
41

4.2. DESIGN OF BEAMS
DATA:
ht
BEAM - A 12 =10 m
Effective Span = 10m
tp
fy
= 415 N/mm2
://
= 20N/mm2
fck
an
Thickness of Beam = 450mm

STAAD OUTPUT
na
Maximum positive BM Mu(+ive) = 215 KNm
ci
Maximum negative BM Mu(-ive) = 425 KNm

Vu
vi
Maximum Shear force
= 247 KN
lo
l.b
DEPTH
Mu lim = 0.138fckb.d2
gs
425106
po
d = (0.13825300)
d = 585 600mm
t.i
D = 600+50 =650mm
REINFORCEMENT AT TOP
42

Mu
= 0.87 Ast fy d 1
sty
ck
ht
425 106 = 0.87 Ast 415 600 1

425 106 = 216630Ast 16.65 Ast2
st 415
45060020
tp
Ast=2407mm2
://
an
Using 2 layers of 5 nos of 25mm dia bars on compression face

Ast pro = 2418.1mm2
na
REINFORCEMENT AT BOTTOM
ci
sty
vi
Mu
ck
l.b
= 0.87 Astfy d 1
215 106 = 0.87 Ast 415 600 1
Using 4nos of 25mm dia bars on the Tension face

Ast pro = 1081.2mm2
t.i
po
gs
Ast=1082.5mm2
45060020
lo
215 106 =216630Ast 16.65 Ast2
st 415
43

SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
ht
CHECK FOR SHEAR STRESS
tp
=
://
247103
= 0.91 N/mm2
an
100Ast
1002418
= 0.89N/mm2
Ref. table 19 from IS456

c = 0.59
lo
l.b
vi
450600
ci
na
Pt =
450600
c < v
gs
po
Then shear reinforcement are to be designed to resist the balance shear

compute as
t.i
Vus = (v c) bd
Vus = (0.91 0.59)45060010-3
44

Vus = 86.4 KN
Using 8 mm dia 2 legged stirrups
ht
0.87
tp
Sv =
an
://
Sv = 251mm
Adopt 8 mm dia 2 legged stirrups at 251mm spacing
na
CHECK FOR DEFLECTION CONTROL
vi
ci
fs = 0.58415
= 239.6
2418.1
Pt = 0.89 , fs =239.6, Fig 4 IS 456-2000 kt= 1.0
t.i
actual =
max = 26111 = 26
5000
600
= 8.3
po
2407
gs
lo
fs = 0.58fy
l.b
max = basicKtKcKf
45
max > actual
Hence safe
://
tp
ht
REINFORCEMENT DETAILING
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
t.i
po
gs
46

DESIGN OF SECONDARY BEAM
DATA:
ht
BEAM AB1 = 5m
Effective Span = 5m
tp
fy
= 415 N/mm2
://
= 20N/mm2
fck
an
Thickness of Beam = 450mm

STAAD OUTPUT
na
Maximum positive BM Mu(+ive) = 215 KNm
ci
Maximum negative BM Mu(-ive) = 425 KNm

Vu
lo
Mu lim = 0.138fckb.d2
= 247 KN
l.b
DEPTH
vi
Maximum Shear force
gs
425106
d= (0.13825300)
po
d = 585 600mm
t.i
D = 600+50 =650mm
REINFORCEMENT AT TOP
47

Mu
= 0.87 Ast fy d 1
sty
ck
ht
425 106 = 0.87 Ast 415 600 1

425 106 =216630Ast 16.65 Ast2
st 415
45060020
tp
Ast=2407mm2
://
an
Using 2 layers of 5 nos of 25mm dia bars on compression face

Ast pro = 2418.1mm2
na
REINFORCEMENT AT BOTTOM
sty
ci
Mu
ck
vi
= 0.87 Astfy d 1
215 106 =216630Ast 16.65 Ast2
45060020
lo
Ast=1082.5mm2
st 415
l.b
215 106 = 0.87 Ast 415 600 1
po
gs
Using 4nos of 25mm dia bars on the Tension face

Ast pro = 1081.2mm2
SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
t.i

v
48

=
ht
Pt
247103
450600
= 0.91 N/mm2
100Ast
tp
1002418
://
450600
= 0.89N/mm2
an
Ref. table 19 from IS456

c = 0.59
ci
na
c < v
Then shear reinforcement are to be designed to resist the balance shear
vi
compute as
lo
l.b
Vus = (v c) bd
Vus = (0.91 0.59)45060010-3
Sv = 251mm
t.i
0.87
Sv =
po
Using 8 mm dia 2 legged stirrups
gs
Vus = 86.4 KN
49

Adopt 8 mm dia 2 legged stirrups at 251mm spacing
CHECK FOR DEFLECTION CONTROL
ht
max = basicKtKcKf
://
tp
fs = 0.58fy
na
an
fs = 0.58415
2407
= 239.6
2418.1
ci
10000
600
gs
actual=
lo
max = 26111 = 26
l.b
vi
Pt=0.89, fs =239.6, Fig 4 IS 456-2000 Kt= 1.0
= 16.67
po
max > actual
t.i
Hence safe
50

lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
51

4.3. DESIGN OF COLUMN
ht
DATA:
tp
COLUMN A1
Pu = 915.875 KN
://
fck = 20 N/mm2
an
fy = 415 N/mm2
na
Strength of compression members with helical reinforcement is 1.05 times the

strength similar members with lateral ties (IS456:2000 cl. 39.4)
vi
ci
Pu = 915.875 / 1.05 = 873 KN
MINIMUM ECCENTRICITY
l.b
lo
Assume; emin = 20mm ; (IS456:2000 CL 25.4)
20mm < 40mm

Pu = 0.4 fck + 0.67 fy Asc (IS456:2000 cl 39.3)
Assume 1 % of steel
Asc = 1/100 x Ag
Pu = 0.4 x 20 x(Ag Asc) + 0.67 x 415 x Ag / 100
Ag = 85591mm2
52
t.i
po
gs
emin < 0.05D
ht
CHECK FOR ECCENTRICITY
tp
0.05D = 0.05 x 800 = 40 mm

emin < 0.05D
://
Hence ok
an
REINFORCEMENT
na
Provide 18 mm dia. Bars
ci
Asc = Ag / 100 = 85591 / 100 = 855.91mm2
Adopt 5 nos. of 18mm dia. Bars
lo
l.b
vi
No. Of bars = 855.91 / x (18 / 2)2 = 3.4
HELICAL REINFORCEMENT
gs
Use 8 mm dia bars mild steel for helical reinforcement
0.36(Ag/Ac 1 )fck / fy = 0.36 ((800/2)2 1/430084 - 1) x 20/250= 4.859 x 10-3
53
Area of core = Ac = x (Dc)2 / 4 = x 7402 / 4 = 430084mm2
t.i
Core dia. = Dc = 800 (2 X29.5) = 740mm
po
fy = 250 N/mm2

dn = 800 (2 x 33.5) = 733mm
Let, S = Pitch of spiral
ht
Vu = dn / S x ( x s / 4)
tp
Vu = 115750.7204 S
Vc = Ac x 1 = 430084 x 1 = 430084
://
115750.7204S /430084 = 4.8596x 10-3
an
S = 55mm
PITCH SCHEDULE
na
< 75mm
(ii)
1/ 6 Dc = 1 /6 x 740 = 123.33mm
(iii)
>3s = 3 x 8 =24mm
(iv)
S = 55mm
lo
l.b
vi
Hence ok
ci
(i)
t.i
po
gs
54
lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
55

4.4. DESIGN OF FOOTING
DATA:
ht
Pu = 915.875 KN
tp
D = 800mm
P = 180 KN/m2
://
fck= 20 N/mm2
an
fy = 415 N/mm2
ci
na
pu = (1.5 x 180) = 270 KN/m2
DIMENSIONS OF FOOTING
l.b
vi
Load on column = 915.875 KN
Self weight of footing = (10%) = 91.6 KN
lo
Total load on soil = wu = 1007.5 KN
Af = area of the footing
Df = (4 x 1.26) / = 1.27 m
t.i
Af = ( Df2 / 4) = (wu / pu) = (1007.5 / 800) = 1.26 m2
po
gs
Let, Df = diameter of the circular footing
Adopt diameter of footing = Df = 2m
56

Upward soil pressure = pu = (915.875 x 4 / x 22) = 291.5 KN/m2 < 300 KN/m2
Hence, the diameter of the footing is adequate to resist the loads.
= 668mm
tp
ht
Rx = 0.6 [R2 + r2 + Rr / R +r ] = 0.6[10002 + 4002 +(1000 x 400) /(1000 + 400)]
Upward load on area (b b c c) is expressed as Wq and computed as,
://
Wq =[ (1 0.42) 291.5 / 4 ] = 192 KN
an
BENDING MOMENT
na
ci
Maximum bending moment at the face of the column quadrant is computed as,
vi
Mu = 192 (0.668 0.4) = 51.5 KN.m
l.b
Breadth of footing = rc / 2 = x 0.4 / 2 = 0.63m = 630 mm

Depth of footing = d = Mu / 0.138 fck b =1.72 m
lo
Depths required from shear considerations will nearly 1.5 times that for moment
gs
computations.
Hence adopt effective depth = d = 250 mm = and overall depth = 300 mm
po
REINFORCEMENTS
= [0.87 x 415 Ast x 250][1 {(Ast 415) / (172 x 250 x 20]

57
t.i
Mu = [0.87fyAstd][1-{(Ast fy)/(bdfck)}]

= 1100mm2
Ast min = (0.0012 x 172 x 300) = 61.92 mm2
Provide 10 mm diameter bars at 150 mm spacing.
tp
ht
://
Ultimate shear force at a distance of 0.25m from the face of column is given by,
an
Vu = 291.5(22 1.352) (/4) = 498.5 KN
Shear per metre width of perimeter = (498.5 / x 1.35) = 110 KN
na
v = (Vu / bd ) = (110 x 103 / 1000 x 250 ) = 0.44 N/mm2

(100 Ast / bd) = (100 x 1100 / 1000 x 250) = 0.44 N/mm2
ci
Refer table 19 of IS 456:2000 and read out the permissible shear stress in
concrete
vi
(ks c) = (1 x 0.45) = 0.45 N/mm2 > 0.44 N/mm2
l.b
Hence, the shear stresses are within safe permissible limits.
lo
t.i
po
gs
58

lo
l.b
vi
ci
na
an
://
tp
ht
t.i
po
gs
59

ESTIMATION
NO
EARTH WORK
EXCAVATION
PLAIN
CEMENT
CONCRETE
RCC FOR
FOUNDATION
BACKFILL
DISPOSAL
RCC FOR
COLUMN
RCC FOR
BEAM1
RCC FOR
BEAM2
RCC FOR SLAB
7
8
0.05
85.5m3
190
0.6
1026m3
30.5
0.6
1453.5m3
1111.5m3
2913.14
m2
1379.7m3
0.6
2986.2m3
10
0.18
9072m3
190
DIA=0.8
AREA=0.5027m2
5
0.45
102
2
110
6
100
8
BRICK WORK1 4
2
10
2
2
2
2
11
75.6
82.8
36.8
65.2
1020
1020
1020
0.2
28
0.2
0.2
0.2
3m
28
28
28
28
28
28
33X190=6270m
3m
48X190=9120m
1693.44
m3
927.36m3
2060.8m3
730.24m3
57120m2
57120m2
57120m2
3870.kg
2026.7kg
t.i
16
0.45
po
BRICKWORK2
BRICKWORK3
BRICKWORK4
PLASTERING
WHITE WASH
PAINTING
REINFORCEME
NT FOR
FOOTING(10m
mDIA)
REINFORCEME
NT FOR
FOOTING(6mm
DIA)
10
QTY
gs
18
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
190
l.b
10
2565m3
vi
HEIGHT OR
DEPTH
M
1.5
na
4
5
6
BREAD
TH
m
3
an
://
3
190
LENG
TH
m
3
ci
PARTICULAR
S
tp
ht
ITE
M
NO
1
60

19
ht
20
tp
22
0.8m
81.6X190=1550
4m
9570.4kg
10m
80X1022=81760 315432.0
m
2kg
2.1m
71.4X1022=729
70.8m
5m
2.1m
28828kg
40X1106=44240 170679.0
m
kg
35.7X1106=394
84.2m
15598.7k
g
l.b
26
57950kg
vi
25
152.5X190=289
75m
ci
24
na
23
an
://
21
30.5m
5m
10m
55X1008=55440 34222.2k
m
g
lo
REINFORCEME 5
NT FOR
COLUMN(18m
m DIA)
REINFORCEME 102
NT FOR
COLUMN(10m
m DIA)
REINFORCEME 8
NT FOR
BEAM1(25mm
DIA)
REINFORCEMN 34
T FOR
BEAM1(8mm
DIA)
REINFORCEME 8
NT FOR
BEAM2(25mm
DIA)
REINFORCEME 17
NT FOR
BEAM2(8mm
DIA)
REINFORCEME 11
NT FOR
SLAB(10mm)
REINFORCEME 17
NT FOR
SLAB(10mm
DIA)
t.i
po
gs
170X1008=1713 10577.7k
6m
g
61
AMOUNT
2565m3
175.00
448875 /-
85.5m3
3000
256500 /-
1026m3
5500
5643000 /-
1453.5m3
1111.5m3
2913.14m2
50
50
5500
72675 / 55575 / 16022270 / -
RCC FOR BEAM1
1379.7m3
5500
7588350 / -
RCC FOR BEAM2
2986.2m3
5500
16424100 / -
RCC FOR SLAB
9072m3
5500
49896000 / -
10
BRICK WORK1
2750
4656960 / -
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
BRICKWORK2
BRICKWORK3
BRICKWORK4
PLASTERING
WHITE WASH
PAINTING
REINFORCEMENT
ELECTRIFICATION
2750
2750
2750
135
10
115
51
2550240 / 5667200 /2008160 /7711200 /571200 /6568800/33086490 / 500000/309727595/-
tp
ht
RATE
vi
ITEM NO
PARTICULARS
QUANTITY
EARTH WORK
EXCAVATION
PLAIN CEMENT
CONCRETE
://
3
4
5
6
7
ci
na
an
RCC FOR
FOUNDATION
BACKFILL
DISPOSAL
RCC FOR COLUMN
1693.44m3
l.b
lo
927.36m3
2060.8m3
730.24m3
57120m2
57120m2
57120m2
648754.72kg
po
gs
TOTAL
t.i
62

CONCLUSION
ht
The multicomplex building of eight storey height is designed to be
tp
located at Tirunelveli. The limit state and working stress method was
adopted. The design for slabs, beams, columns, footing has been
://
done.
an
It is concluded that the design by manual method satisfies the
entire requirement and it would be sufficient for the construction of
na
building.
In this work a eight storey multicomplex with all the facilities for
ci
a comfortable working has been properly analysed and designed as
lo
l.b
vi
per IS456-2000.
t.i
po
gs
63

REFERENCES
tp
ht
1. P.C.Varghese, Limit state design of reinforced concrete
://
2. N.Krishna Raju, R.N.Pranesh, Reinforced concrete design

3. B.C.Punmia, Theory of structures
an
4. B.N.Dutta, Estimating and Costing in Civil Engg.
5. Code IS456:2000
na
6. Code Sp:16
7. Code IS 875:1986
lo
l.b
vi
ci
t.i
po
gs
64

Model Project For Civil Engineering

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Model Project For Civil Engineering

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.

A DESIGN PROJECT REPORT

in partial fulfilment for the award of the degree

XXXXX COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,

ANNA UNIVERSITY: CHENNAI 6

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

Certified that this project report DESIGN OF MULTICOMPLEX

NAMES who carried out the project

HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

PLAN, ELEVATION AND SECTION

Ground floor plan

ANALYSIS OF MULTISTOREY FRAME

4.3 Design of column

4.4 Design of footing

4.2 Design of beams

3.1 Frame analysis

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

VII. Footing detailing

Beam maximum bending moments

Beam maximum shear forces

Column maximum axial forces

Column maximum bending moments

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

We take this opportunity to express our thanks to our beloved principal

and our correspondent Rev.Fr.Jesu Marian for

their co-operative guidance and encouragement.

We are extremely grateful to our beloved H.O.D, civil Engg, and

Dr.S.Carmel Jawahar M.E., Ph.D for his help and encouragement.

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

This report discusses on the Design of a Multicomplex building. This project

was done for the structural elements as per SP 3.

Plan and detailing are enclosed in this report.

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

Ast - Area of tensile reinforcement

- Overall depth of beam or slab

- Effective depth of beam or slab

B.M - Bending moment

R.M - Resisting moment

Leff - Effective span of beam, slab or column

Asc - Area of compression reinforcement

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

cbc - Permissble stress in concrete in bending compression

Chracteristic strength of concrete

v - Normal shear stress

c - Permissble shear stress

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

strength and high compressibility. Whenever poor soil conditions are at

to overcome the problems.

Avoid the site by relocating the proposed structure at a site with

better soil conditions.

Adopt a foundation system that recognizes the inadequacies of the

soil and transfers load to it in a manner that the inadequacies are

below the poor soil.

Improve or modify the properties of the soil either by excavating

engineering properties or by in-situ treatment without excavation

these processes are known as ground improvement or ground

Due to growth of population and scarcity of land, construction of

DOWNLOADED FROM http://annacivil.blogspot.com

GROUND IMPROVEMENT AND MODIFICATION

The terms ground improvement and modification refer to the

improvement or modification to the engineering properties of the soil so

engineering activity. The improved or modified soil exhibits satisfactory