Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A.
B.
C.
D.
1.
2.
3.
4.
BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................................................1-1
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS...........................................................................................................................................1-1
ANALYSIS SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................................1-1
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................................1-2
RECOMMENDATION 1.............................................................................................................................................1-2
RECOMMENDATION 2.............................................................................................................................................1-2
RECOMMENDATION 3.............................................................................................................................................1-2
RECOMMENDATION 4.............................................................................................................................................1-2
PART 2 - BACKGROUND
A.
B.
C.
GENERAL CONDITIONS..........................................................................................................................................3-1
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS............................................................................................................................................3-1
INITIAL FAILURE INDICATION..................................................................................................................................3-2
UNIT SHUTDOWN..................................................................................................................................................3-2
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS...........................................................................................................................................3-3
REPAIR.................................................................................................................................................................3-3
STUDIES AND TESTING..........................................................................................................................................3-3
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................4-1
STUDY AND TEST RESULTS....................................................................................................................................4-1
RESULTS DISCUSSION............................................................................................................................................4-3
REVENUE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................................5-1
EXPENSE SUMMARY...............................................................................................................................................5-1
INSURANCE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................................5-1
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................5-1
CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................................................................6-1
RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................................................6-1
RECOMMENDATION 1.............................................................................................................................................6-1
RECOMMENDATION 2.............................................................................................................................................6-1
RECOMMENDATION 3.............................................................................................................................................6-1
RECOMMENDATION 4.............................................................................................................................................6-1
FURTHER ACTION.................................................................................................................................................6-1
Energas S.A.
Page ii
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 SUMMARY SEQUENCE OF EVENTS............................................................................................................................1-2
TABLE 2 DETAILED SEQUENCE OF EVENTS............................................................................................................................3-2
TABLE 3 LOST REVENUE CALCULATION................................................................................................................................5-2
TABLE 4 TOTAL CAPEX AND EXPENSES.................................................................................................................................5-2
TABLE 5 TOTAL INSURANCE CLAIM CALCULATION................................................................................................................5-2
TABLE 6 TOTAL COST AND LOST REVENUE CALCULATION.....................................................................................................5-2
TABLE 5 SAMPLE TABLE SELECT THE WHOLE TABLE COPY AND PASTE WHERE DESIRED.............................................................6-2
Energas S.A.
Page iii
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
TABLE OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 SAMPLE TABLE SELECT THE WHOLE FIGURE, COPY AND PASTE WHERE DESIRED.........................................................6-2
Energas S.A.
Page iv
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Energas S.A.
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
A.
Background
On August 14, 2009 during normal operation at 30 MW & 1 MVAR, GT10 lost all active power
producing a loud noise heard by the operations crew.
With the breaker closed the operator tried to load up the unit again unsuccessfully creating only a
speed increase on the turbine.
Under these circumstances it was decided to open the unit breaker creating high vibration readings
on the generator transducers. Following this action operator shut the turbine down for further
investigation.
With GT10 on cooldown it was noticed that when ratcheting only the turbine rotor was turning and
the generator rotor was not moving. This indicated a Load Gear box failure determined but most
likely on the quill shaft.
Once the load gear box covers were removed severe damage was found on the low speed quill shaft.
B.
Sequence of Events
Summary of the sequence of events:
DATE
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
TIME
07:49:00
07:49:03
2009/08/14
07:49:03
2009/08/14
07:49:07
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
08:04:34
08:05:17
08:20:31
08:33:28
08:36:55
08:54:17
09:00:00
2009/08/15
09:00:00
DESCRIPTION
GT10 operating at 30 MW & 1 MVAR.
All active power is lost Loud Noise heard by operators
L30A87 Loss of MW transducer feedback alarm came in
the HMI
Generator running with 0 MW and 1 MVAR. Turbine speed
went up to 5477 RPM and System frequency remained at
60.01 Hz
52G breaker opened by Operator
L30A154 Excitation Limiter Operating alarm came in.
L30A81 Generator Field Ground alarm came in
L30A40 High Vibration Alarm came in
Turbine shut down by operator
Turbine at Zero Speed and left on Cooldown
Investigation starts involving electrical and mechanical
technical crews.
Unit cool. Load gear box covers removed. Quill shaft
damage identified at low speed shaft.
Table 1 Summary Sequence of Events
C.
Analysis Summary
As a result of the analysis and inspection of the unit we can clearly state that the mechanical failure of
the low speed quill shaft resulted in a complete loss of active load. Generator kept running as a
synchronic compensator and no electrical stress was suffered.
Once the breaker was opened the vibration levels were really high so a mechanical inspection of the
bearings should be conducted while the unit is down.
Full inspection and refurbishment of damaged components from the load gear box must take place
according to MJB and Engineering specifications.
As a ground fault alarm followed the incident a full set of electrical testing will take place on the
generator rotor to determine if any damage was caused during the event.
Electrical protections should be reviewed to determine if this kind of event where the generator rotor
becomes a synchronic compensator is a risk and generator breaker must trip.
Energas S.A.
Page 6
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Financial analysis will be done once the different proposals are defined by MJB and Engineering
department.
D.
Recommendation 1
A full inspection of the LGB by MJB on site to analyze if it is possible to replace the damage
parts in the field. This will reduce cost and time if parts available. An MJB representative
should come to site as soon as available.
2.
Recommendation 2
Evaluate replacement of the installed LGB with the GE LGB that we have in stock if they are
compatible. Information has been sent to Engineering department and MJB for their study.
Replies should be available next week.
3.
Recommendation 3
If it is determined that the GE LGB cannot be used we should start looking for a refurbished
or new LGB to replace the failed one.
4.
Recommendation 4
Send MJB repair request for the failed LGB to determine timeline and cost to repair the
damage on a specialized shop in UK if recommendation #1 is not possible.
Energas S.A.
Page 7
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
PART 2 BACKGROUND
Energas S.A.
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
A.
Vibration Analysis reports from start up to July 2009 dont mention any concerns in respect to the
gear box. Last acceleration spectrum readings on that bearing.
Equipo GT 10 5A ESPAM 7/9/2009
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
910
Energas S.A.
1820
2730
3640
4550
Hz
Page 9
5460
6370
7280
8190
9100
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
B.
Production History
GT10 always operated on Base Load. On April 14th, 2009 one HV cable failed and the unit has been
operated at derated load preselected at 30 MW and 1 MVar.
C.
Energas S.A.
Page 10
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Energas S.A..
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
B.
General Conditions
On August 14, 2009 during normal operation at 30 MW & 1 MVAR, GT10 lost all active power
producing a loud noise heard by the operations crew.
With the breaker closed the operator tried to load up the unit again unsuccessfully creating only a
speed increase on the turbine.
Under these circumstances it was decided to open the unit breaker creating high vibration readings
on the generator transducers. Following this action operator shut the turbine down for further
investigation.
No work was conducted on the unit before or during the incident.
Weather conditions were normal.
C.
Sequence of events
DATE
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
TIME
07:49:00
07:49:03
2009/08/14
07:49:03
2009/08/14
07:49:07
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
2009/08/14
08:04:34
08:05:17
08:20:31
08:33:28
08:36:55
08:54:17
09:00:00
2009/08/15
09:00:00
DESCRIPTION
GT10 operating at 30 MW & 1 MVAR.
All active power is lost Loud Noise heard by operators
L30A87 Loss of MW transducer feedback alarm came in
the HMI
Generator running with 0 MW and 1 MVAR. Turbine speed
went up to 5477 RPM and System frequency remained at
60.01 Hz
52G breaker opened by Operator
L30A154 Excitation Limiter Operating alarm came in.
L30A81 Generator Field Ground alarm came in
L30A40 High Vibration Alarm came in
Turbine shut down by operator
Turbine at Zero Speed and left on Cooldown
Investigation starts involving electrical and mechanical
technical crews.
Unit cool. Load gear box covers removed. Quill shaft
damage identified at low speed shaft.
Table 2 Detailed Sequence of Events
Energas S.A.
Page 12
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
1.
2.
Unit Shutdown
The unit didnt trip from turbine or generator protections. After the breaker was opened high
vibrations were recorded by the transducers on the generator end sensors. Electricians
performed some measurements on the excitation system and determined the generator rotor
was turning at a low speed and it was decided to shut the turbine down using the STOP
command from the HMI. As the turbine was coasting down higher vibrations were recorded
and a High Vibration alarm came in.
Energas S.A.
Page 13
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
3.
D.
Corrective Actions
After the unit was shut down it was left on cool down to be able to inspect the gear box.
No corrective actions were taken at this point.
Repair
Repair time and scope will be established by MJB in combination with Sherritt Power engineering
department.
E.
The trending shows that at 07:49:03 all active load was lost and no disturbances from the grid were
present at that time.
Reactive power remained steady at 1 MVar which was the preselected reactive load set point. That
indicates excitation didnt trip when the mechanical link between the turbine and the generator was
lost.
Under these conditions the turbine kept running at 102.73% of rated speed (5275 RPM) which was the
DSP value when the active load was dropped. The generator remained turning at synchronous speed
operating as a synchronous compensator. The magnetic link with the grid was never lost and the
frequency at that time was 59.86 Hz.
Energas S.A.
Page 14
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
No electrical protections actuated at or after the moment of the load gear box failure. Parameters are
listed below:
GT10_Dfrec
GT10_DVolt
1
GT10_DVolt
2
GT10_DVolt
3
GT10_DAmp
1
GT10_DAmp
2
GT10_DAmp
3
GT10_DPow
erF
GT10_DWAT
T
Hz
Before
60.01
kV
13.367
kV
13.367
kV
13.242
After
59.86
13.36
7
13.36
7
13.24
2
kA
1.255
kA
1.232
kA
1.226
0.99
0
0
GT10_MVA
GT10_DVAR
MVA
MVAR
30.56
30.592
97
1.42
MW
1.08
1.08
Energas S.A.
Page 15
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Fuel valve operated according to the sudden power loss reducing its position from 51.16% to 15.17%
opening. There was a speed overshoot which was controlled and brought back to 5275 RPM
according to the governor set point. Theres no indication of malfunction on any control component
regarding gas control valve.
Energas S.A.
Page 16
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Energas S.A.
Page 17
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
When analyzing the trending before and after the breaker was opened we can clearly identify there
was a step change when the load gear box quill shaft failed but the unit kept operating with both
rotors at a pretty similar speed to previous conditions. Some vibration spikes are shown in 39VA-4A
and 4B corresponding to the transducers installed on the gear box side generator bearing. The
vibration levels stayed below alarm levels.
Once the breaker was opened the generator rotor lost its link with the grid and started coasting down
creating a speed differential between the quill shaft and load gear box bull. This speed differential
was reflected by the vibration readings increase. This reinforces the fact that the generator was
turning at synchronous speed after the quill shaft failure.
Energas S.A.
Page 18
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Energas S.A.
Page 19
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
A.
Introduction
After reviewing all the trends it was decided to open up the load gear box to quantify the damage
extent.
B.
Energas S.A.
Page 20
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Energas S.A.
Page 21
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
C.
Results Discussion
As a result of the analysis and inspection of the unit we can clearly state that the mechanical failure of the low
speed quill shaft resulted in a complete loss of active load. Generator kept running as a synchronic
compensator and no electrical stress was suffered.
Once the breaker was opened the vibration levels were really high so a mechanical inspection of the bearings
should be conducted while the unit is down.
Full inspection and refurbishment of damaged components from the load gear box must take place according
to MJB and Engineering specifications.
As a ground fault alarm followed the incident a full set of electrical testing will take place on the generator
rotor to determine if any damage was caused during the event.
Electrical protections should be reviewed to determine if this kind of event where the generator rotor
becomes a synchronic compensator is a risk and generator breaker must trip.
Energas S.A.
Page 22
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Energas S.A.
Page 23
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
A.
Revenue Summary
Discuss the lost Revenue Summary, ensure that we reference the realistic figures based on gas supply
and availability, do not pad this number.
DESCRIPTION
Lost Days
Average Net Daily Capacity
Price per MWhr
Hours per day
Lost Revenue
TOTALS
X
X
X
24
$x,xxx,xxx
B.
Expense Summary
Detail the expenses to put the unit back in service and discuss the various line items.
DESCRIPTION
Capex
Capex 1
Capex 2 (Add lines as required)
Total Capex
Expenses
Expense 1
Expense 2
Total Expenses
Total Capex and Expenses
TOTALS
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
C.
Insurance Summary
Detail the insurance claim related to the failure if any, include all relevant details, what was the
deductable (with explanation), what adjustments if any were made (and why), were there any
additional claims due to other reasons etc.
DESCRIPTION
Expediting Recovery
Business Interruption
Deductable
Adjustments
Total Insurance Clain
TOTALS
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
D.
Energas S.A.
Page 24
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
timing of the payments etc. to provide some context to the numbers, it looks better than it actually is
by the time we factor in any delays in payment from insurance etc.
DESCRIPTION
Total Estimated Lost Revenue
Total Expense Summary
Total Insurance Claim
Total Cost and Lost Revenue
TOTALS
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
$x,xxx,xxx
Energas S.A.
Page 25
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Energas S.A.
Page 26
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
A.
Conclusions
Full inspection and refurbishment of damaged components from the load gear box must take place according
to MJB and Engineering specifications.
As a ground fault alarm followed the incident a full set of electrical testing will take place on the generator
rotor to determine if any damage was caused during the event.
Electrical protections should be reviewed to determine if this kind of event where the generator rotor
becomes a synchronic compensator is a risk and generator breaker must trip.
B.
C.
Recommendations
1.
Recommendation 1
A full inspection of the LGB by MJB on site to analyze if it is possible to replace the damage
parts in the field. This will reduce cost and time if parts available. An MJB representative
should come to site as soon as available.
2.
Recommendation 2
Evaluate replacement of the installed LGB with the GE LGB that we have in stock if they are
compatible. Information has been sent to Engineering department and MJB for their study.
Replies should be available next week.
3.
Recommendation 3
If it is determined that the GE LGB cannot be used we should start looking for a refurbished
or new LGB to replace the failed one.
4.
Recommendation 4
Send MJB repair request for the failed LGB to determine timeline and cost to repair the
damage on a specialized shop in UK if recommendation #1 is not possible.
Further Action
Will be defined at a later stage.
Energas S.A.
Page 27
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM
Notes on Usage:
Tables and Figures: Table and Figure numbers will automatically number themselves, just select the
whole table or figure, right click and select Update Field
Table of Contents, Table of Figures and Table of Tables:Will all automatically update to the correct
page numbers, names etc. Just select the table of contents, the table of figures, or the table of tables,
right click and select the Update Field option, this will automatically update everything for you.
SAMPLE
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
SAMPLE
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Table 7 Sample Table Select the whole table Copy and paste where
desired
Figure 1 Sample table Select the whole figure, copy and paste where desired
Energas S.A.
Page 28
15-Aug-09 1:42:00 PM