Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCHOOL CONTEXT
Contextual data indicates high levels of deprivation, high student mobility, and attainment significantly below
average on entry. KS2 Average point score on entry is particularly low at 26.3. CATs Verbal scores range
from 90-93 indicating particularly low levels of literacy.
The % of girls in the year group was in the lowest quintile at 45%. Girls also had a lower starting point than
boys (KS2 APS 25.8 v 26.9). 30 students had no KS2 data. The CATS scores of these students were
significantly lower than those students with KS2 data.
For the 2013-2014 the School supported an unusually high number of students (18) who experienced extreme
circumstances outside of school which seriously impacted on their learning. (The analysis will refer to this
group as B2L; barriers to learning). This had the effect of masking the achievement of the large majority of
students (217) which is clearly good.
This SEF will demonstrate how differently each of these 2 groups performed in terms of both progress and
attainment and also highlight the disproportionate impact this relatively small number of students had on each
group they were members of.
Why the School Now judges itself to be good
The school judges itself to be good. Despite the challenging context outlined above both the attainment and
progress of the students has improved steadily over the last 4 years and current progress data shows students
now at or above national average in the majority of measures.
Working with a weaker year group than in 2013 and against a backdrop of a 6.6% national drop in the 5+A*-C
inc En & Ma the school improved by 3% to 49%.This was the highest achieved in the last 4 years and closed
the gap to just 4% between the School and the National Average which only 4 years prior had been 17%. The
DFE performance tables place the school 17th for attainment from 55 similar schools for 2014.
The advances in attainment as seen above have been underpinned by improvements in progress. This is clear
from the historical value added data which has improved year on year from since 2011.
Value Added 2011-2014
Despite the many contextual difficulties outlined
there has been significant improvement in the
progress of all students over the last few years.
Current predicted grades suggest that this will be
sustained.
Attainment 2014
ALL (235)
NAT
KS2 APS
5A*-C in E & M
Best 8 capped
Eng APS
Maths APS
26.5
49
292
37.3
36.1
27.9
53
307
38.7
38.0
Without
B2L(217)
27.0
53
308
38.5
37.8
With B2L(18)
26.0
0
121
20.8
15.8
Despite having a lower starting point, the 92% of students at Northolt without acute barriers to learning
have matched national averages for many attainment measures as outlined above.
Progress 2014
The Current Value added score of 1005.1 places the School at the 45th percentile. The table below shows how
strong progress at the school is for those students without extreme barriers to learning.
Progress Measure
Best 8 VA
English
Maths
Eng 3+
Maths 3+
ALL (201)
1005.1
999.1
1001.1
73
65
National
1000
1000
1000
71
65
Without B2L(217)
1023.4
1001.4
1002.7
79
70
With B2L(18)
812.5
985
983.1
12
6
Northolt High School is perhaps unusual in relation to most schools in terms of the number/proportion of
students who experience these barriers. Many effective steps to support the needs of these students had
been taken by the school as is clear from the detailed case studies.
Pupil Premium
On the measures listed the schools disadvantaged students have attained and progressed better than National
disadvantaged students. There is however a notable difference between the attainment and progress of
disadvantaged and other students in the school. To some degree these summary statistics mislead as the acute
underperformance of 14 disadvantaged has lowered the averages for the whole disadvantaged group
dramatically. The attainment and progress of 4 out of 5 disadvantaged students is comparable with other
students in the school. The school of course recognizes that 1 out 5 disadvantaged students have really
struggled to engage in learning. Case studies will however demonstrate that the school went to considerable
lengths to support these students whose wider needs were expertly addressed. Additionally KS2 starting point
of 25.5 for the PP students was lower than the non PP student which was 26.8. This difference would translate
to about 10% for the 5+ A*-C inc E & M.
Disadvantaged (all=80)
Disadvantaged (without
B2L =66)
Disadvantaged (with B2L
=14)
Other
Nat D
Nat O
5A*-C
EM
41
Best 8
VA
267
986
1025
English
3+
67
Maths
3+
55
72
64
50
300
112
812
10
54
36
62
309
258
325
1016
978
1008
76
58
75
71
48
71
5+A*-C EM
NAT
49
51
48
16
14
17
50
93
73
80
54
49
33
50
33
53
50
61
24
20
5
50
92
72
51
56
56
52
62
46
Best 8
Point score
NHS
295
296
290
250
205
237
295
367
320
317
307
268
300
304
291
Best 8
Point score
NAT
307
293
321
250
214
183
302
385
350
302
313
308
307
329
292
Best 8 VA
NHS
1005.1
1001
1010
1017
991
1057
995
981
1003
1036
1024
961
1049
1043
1015
Best 8 VA
NAT
1000
989
1011
985
946
1000
1000
1000
1035
1018
1034
994
1032
1041
1002
Analysis of groups demonstrates boys at Northolt High School to be just ahead of national boys for
attainment and progress. Progress of SEN students is strong and well ahead of national SEN student
progress. Low Middle and High ability pupils were at or above National Average at 5A*-C inc. EM as were
most ethnic groups. Attainment and progress of the lower ability groups was very strong compared to
national data.
Attainment of high ability pupils is in line with high ability students nationally. Expected Progress of high
ability pupils in English and Maths is reported as being -7 % & -9% below national average rates for this
group but when the schools sub-level distribution is taken into account these figures reduce to +2% for
English and -2% for Maths national averages.
Group
N
o
VA
All
2
0
1
4
2
100
5.1
N
o
B
2
L
1
8
983
995
.6
1
2
Disadvan
taged
1
1
9
7
3
984
.5
1
6
White
British
7
1
958
.7
1
3
High
Middle
V
A
Ot
he
r
VA
81
2.
5
79
7.
8
80
7.
8
81
2.
1
80
8
18
3
102
3.4
40
993
10
7
101
6.7
59
102
5
58
990
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
ALL
With
Without
.
Attainment and Progress over 3 years and current forecast for Years 11 & 10 all/ disadvantaged
KS2
5+A*-C EM
Best 8
VA
English 3+
Maths 3+
2012
25.9
45
316
992
68
77
2012 d
36
2013
26.7
46
2013 d
43
307
328
305
987
60
61
1000
70
73
981
63
59
2014
26.3
49
295
1005
76
71
2014 d
2015
41
259
985
67
55
25.3
51
301
1016
72
75
2015 d
2016
2016d
53
304
1020
72
74
26.5
64
311
1039
84
83
67
316
1034
90
79
The upward trend in the 5A*-C inc. EM and progress (best 8 Value Added) looks set to continue. Staff
predictions for the current year 11 are based upon 2 sets of mock exams.
There has been a year on year gap between disadvantaged and other students at the school for both attainment
and progress although this looks set to close dramatically in 2015.
KS3 Attainment and Progress
ALL
GIRL
BOY
PP
Other
High
Middle
Low
SEN
White Brit PP
White Brit Other
Black
White All
Asian All
AT 7
24.2
24.5
24
24
24.4
Pr 7
1.21
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.3
22.4
22.7
24.7
23.6
23.9
24.2
0.69
0.79
1.3
1
1.2
1.2
AT 8
27.8
28.9
27
28.9
26
31.6
28.6
26.3
26.5
28
29.7
29.9
27
27.5
Pr 8
3.34
3.8
2.9
3.5
3
3.8
3.2
3
2.8
3.1
3.3
3.8
2.9
3.9
AT 9
32.33
33
31.8
32.6
32.1
36.4
32.6
28.6
30.1
30.6
33.7
32.7
31.8
32.9
Pr 9
5
5
5
4.9
5
5.7
4.7
4.1
4.2
4.4
5
5
4.9
4.7
2012
96
533
183
2013
71
696
202
2014
16
595
183.8
-0.14
7
0.07
6
0.3
3
0.13
6
-0.01
5
0.11
5
Overall progress at A2 for 2014 was in line with national rates as indicated by both the Lev 3 Value added of
0.01 and the ALPs T score of a 5 .Average and total points scores are significantly lower than national
average but reflect the very low starting points of the students with a GCSE APS of just 41.6.
Progress at AS has been consistent and for the third year running is slightly above national average