Manhattan College

School Profile Analysis

Student Name:

Kelly Murray_______________

Name of School: Pablo Casals PS 181_____________

Location District/County District 11__
School Address:

800 Baychester Ave,

Bronx, NY 10475

Telephone #:

______718-904-5600_____

Student E-Mail:

_KMurray.student@manhattan.edu_________________________

If your school is not located in the Bronx you will need to go to the NYSED.gov website and find your schools
report card.
New York City website is http://schools.nyc.gov.

Achievement Data
NYS Elementary English Language Arts
Students Results
Please pick one grade to analyze
Year

Level
Standards

1
Below
Standards

2013

Percent
# of
Students
Level
Standards

35%
265

Year

2014

Percent
# of
Students

1
Below
Standards
29%
243

2
Meets Basic
Standards
(Approaching)
39%
298

3
Meets
Proficiency
Standard
18%
134

4
Exceeds
Proficiency
Standards
9%
67

2
Meets Basic
Standards
(Approaching)
42%
355

3
Meets
Proficiency
Standard
21%
178

4
Exceeds
Proficiency
Standards
9%
73

Analysis of ELA Data Please indicate the % of students performing below grade level (i.e. levels 1 &
2). Please describe what Levels 1 & 2 represents (i.e. 1 below standards, 2 approaching standards).
Compare the last 2 years to see if there is improvement:
There was an improvement from 2013-2014 which is interesting because the new tests were implemented.
There were less students on level 1.

Achievement Data
NYS Elementary Math
Students Results
Please pick one grade to analyze
Year

Level
Standards

1
Below
Standards

2
3
4
Meets Basic
Meets
Exceeds
Standards
Proficiency Proficiency
(Approaching) Standard
Standards
2013
Percent
37%
32%
20%
12%
# of Students
284
242
150
88
Year
Level
1
2
3
4
Standards
Below
Meets Basic
Meets
Exceeds
Standards
Standards
Proficiency Proficiency
(Approaching) Standard
Standards
2014
Percent
38%
31%
18%
13%
# of Students
287
237
133
98
Analysis of Math Data Please indicate the % of students performing below grade level (i.e.
levels 1 & 2). Please describe what Levels 1 & 2 represents (i.e. 1 below standards, 2
approaching standards). Compare the last 2 years to see if there is improvement:
It is very interesting because scores pretty much stayed the same. This tells that the students
are at a good pace, but need to be pushed a little more to get to the next level.

Find Information on Excel Spreadsheets (look at tabs on bottom)

Overview of School Performance in ELA
Results
Student Group
All Students
Students w/ Disabilities
Limited English
Proficient

Total #
Tested
764
124
20

2012-2013
% Levels
1-2
74%
96%
100%

% Levels
3-4
27%
3%
0%

Total #
Tested
849
156
11

2013-2014
% Levels
1-2
71%
96%
100%

% Levels
3-4
30%
3%
0%

Analysis of ELA Data - Compare General Ed to Students with Disabilities levels on 1&2 and also indicate if
there is a difference between the groups for past two years - Indicate if there was improvement :
The scores stayed the same with the students with disabilities and limited English proficiency. The difference
between the Gen Ed to Students with disabilities is 24% and 27% on level 3-4. The students with disabilities
only had 3 % with threes and fours. The reasons for this vary due to the students individual needs. I know the
language and how the tests asks certain questions can confuse a lot of the general education students, so we
know it is difficult for a student with a disability.

Analysis of ELA Data - Compare the performance of the ELL students to the performance of all students. Please
indicate in your report what Levels 1 & 2 indicate. Compare the last 2 years to see if there is improvement:
The performance of the ELL students is the lowest between all of the groups. They all scored a 1 or 2. Now a
majority of general education students and students with disabilities scored a 1 or 2, but some scored a 3 or 4.

Find Information on Excel Spreadsheets (look at tabs on bottom)

Results
Student Group
All Students
Students w/ Disabilities
Limited English
Proficient

Total #
Tested
764
122
21

Overview of School Performance in Math

2012-2013
% Levels
% Levels
Total #
1-2
3-4
Tested
69%
32%
755
96%
4%
158
95%
5%
12

2013-2014
% Levels
1-2
69%
95%
100%

% Levels
3-4
31%
5%
0%

Analysis of Math Data - Compare General Ed to Students with Disabilities levels 1&2 and also indicate if there
is a difference between the groups for past two years - Indicate if there was improvement :
Almost all the percentages stayed the same for the past 2 years, except limited English proficiency. The amount
of students with disabilities increased, but the percentages still stayed the same. The students with limited
English proficiency all scored on level 1 and 2 in 2013-2014, but they had 5 % in 2012-2013.

Analysis of Math Data - Compare the performance of the ELL students to the performance of all students.
Please indicate in your report what Levels 1 & 2 indicate. Compare the last 2 years to see if there is
improvement:
The students with limited English proficiency all scored on level 1 and 2 in 2013-2014. In 2012-2013, they had
5 % score a 3 or a 4. The total number tested was basically cut in half in 2013-2014. The difference in
percentages between the performance of the ELL students and all other students is the same as the ELA results.

Find the information on the School Report Card

www.nysed.gov
Eligible for
Free Lunch

Demographics
Reduced
Student
Price Lunch
Stability

2011

54% #323

13%

#80

Limited
English
Proficient
2% #14

2012

52%

16% #108

2%

Year

#355

Notes

#14

Analysis of Data Indicate any or no changes over the two years:

The data shows there is no drastic changes over the two years.

Racial/Ethnic Origin
Year

American
Indian/ Alaska
Native

Black or
African
American

Hispanic or
Latino

2011

0%

#2

65%

#455

26%

2012

0%

#3

67%

#455

25% #170

Asian or Native
Hawaiian/ Other
Pacific Islander

159# 4%
4%

White

#24

4%

#27

4%

#23
#25

Analysis of Data Indicate any or no changes over the two years:

There was only a 1-2% change over the past 2 years.

Year
2011-12

Attendance & Suspensions

Attendance %
Suspensions
94%
#
5%
#28

Notes

2012-13

95%

8%

#46

Analysis of Data Indicate any or no changes over the two years

The attendance stayed the same, but the suspensions increased in 2012-2013.