Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economic Design of Small Scale LNG Tankers and Terminals
Economic Design of Small Scale LNG Tankers and Terminals
LNG Conference
An
Standard
LNG Conference
Two
Anthony
LNG Conference
LNG Conference
inner roof
roof
external insulation
with weather barrier
base insulation
base insulation
bund wall
Bund wall
elevated concrete base
LNG Conference
roof
rain cover
rain cover
insulated suspended deck
prestressed
concrete
outer tank
wall
external insulation
with weather barrier
outer tank
shell
( able to
contain
the liquid )
base insulation
LNG Conference
roof
inner tank
base insulation
wall insulation
at inner side
of outer tank
( or loose filled
insulation )
outer tank
shell
or prestressed
concrete wall
with liner
LNG Conference
LNG Conference
10
Diameter:
Length TL TL:
Volume:
Material:
Insulation:
Design pressure:
4.6 m
75 m
5 x 1,200 cbm
5% Nickel steel
foamglas
23 bar g
LNG storage:
Material:
Insulation:
Design
pressure:
11
12
LNG Conference
13
LNG Conference
14
LNG Conference
15
tank design
Boil-off
16
(Integral tanks)
Membrane tanks
Independent tanks
(Type
A)
Type
Type
C
LNG Conference
17
pressure
vessel
cylindrical or bilobe with
outside insulation
no secondary barrier
required
no restriction concerning
partial filling
LNG Conference
18
5,700 m (4 tanks)
4.7 bar g
480 t
5% Nickel steel
LNG Conference
19
tank design
tank design
LNG Conference
20
Tank material:
(Aluminium)
(9% Ni-steel)
SS AISI 304L
LNG Conference
21
Min.
Tank
weights:
LNG Conference
22
30,000 m LNG-Carrier
lbp = 175.2 m
b = 27.6 m
d = 8.8 m
speed = 17.5 kn
LNG Conference
23
Problem
Detailed
24
LNG Conference
25
LNG Conference
26
Patent pending
LNG Conference
27
LNG Conference
28
3,5
9% Ni
Pressure [bar g]
SS 304L
2,5
2
Bas ic LNG
Com pos ition
N2:2%
CO2:0%
C1:89%
C2:5,5%
C3:2,5%
C4:1%
1,5
0,5
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LNG Conference
29
30
HFO
GAS
HFO
GAS
thrusters
31
LNG Conference
32
LNG Conference
33
operating flexibility
LNG transportation demands
to 35,000 m
LNG Conference
34
CAPEX:
Little
Tanks
TGE
LNG Conference
35
Conclusion
36