Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mountjoy, P. A. The East Aegean-West Anatolian Interface in The Late Bronze Age. Mycenaeans and The Kingdom of Ahhiyawa.
Mountjoy, P. A. The East Aegean-West Anatolian Interface in The Late Bronze Age. Mycenaeans and The Kingdom of Ahhiyawa.
Kingdom of Ahhiyawa
Author(s): P. A. Mountjoy
Source: Anatolian Studies, Vol. 48 (1998), pp. 33-67
Published by: British Institute at Ankara
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3643047 .
Accessed: 23/02/2015 17:59
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
British Institute at Ankara is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Anatolian
Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
Kastro:R. Heidenreich,
AthMit60-61 (1935-36),165-69pl
49a,W.Buttler,Ibid,190-96pl 68; Heraion:H. Walter,Ibid72
14
(1957), 36-37.
7 L. Morricone,
Annuario50-51
8 A.
(1972-73),296-337.
(1982),139-87.
10See R.
Hagg and N. Marinatos(eds), The Minoan Thalassocracy,Mythand Reality, Stockholm, 1984, for referencesand
references.
AD 37A
Papazoglou,
33
24
16
34
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Mountjoy
41 C. Blegen et al,
42
35
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
AnatolianStudies 1998
subtype found in the Dodecanese and Anatolia; a local
workshop is suggested for these bronzes54. There are
also three local Anatolianvases.
The LH IIIA2 pottery from Ephesos from the
disturbedtomb on the Byzantine citadel at Ayasoluk is
also a typical Interfacemixture. It includes a Mycenaean
rhyton and flask of standardtype, a second flask with a
non-Aegean shapebut with Mycenaeandecorationand a
kraterand piriformjar with Minoan characteristics.The
krateris decoratedwith argonautswith triangularfilling
motifs in a Minoan or east Aegean fashion while the
piriformjar has a Minoan syntax and spirals of Minoan
type with a thickened outer coil not found on the
Mainlandin this phase. Both vases are probably local
imitations55. The recent trial trenches below the
Artemisionhave producedsome LH IIIB-IIICsherdsand
animal figurines of Mycenaean and Anatolian type, as
well as the head of a terracottafigure56.
At Miletos the second building period has LH IIIA1
and LH IIIA2 pottery,but little has yet been published57.
The architectureis probablyAnatolian, but Mycenaean
parallelshave also been suggested58.Seven kilns of two
types have been found, the first an Anatolian type,
although Mycenaean parallels have been put forward,
and the second a Minoan version with parallel flues59.
There was a burnt destructionat the end of LH IIIA2
after which the settlementwas rebuilt and at some point
in LH IIIB a fortificationwall was constructed. There is
no undisturbedevidence for LH IIIB yet. Sherds from
two locally made pithoi with incised signs which might
be LinearB have no exact LinearB parallels;indeed, one
might be Hittite and one a local Milesian variant60.The
presence of a phi figurine in the LH IIIA building phase
and a psi figurine in the LH IIIB one cannotbe taken by
themselves to indicateMycenaeanritualas claimed61.At
lasos the thirdlevel has LH IIB-IIICpotteryfrom widely
separatedsoundingssuggesting a large settlement;Benzi
notes that some of the Mycenaean pottery is locally
made62.The stratigraphyis not good and the potterycan
only be dated stylistically. The chambertomb cemetery
at Mtisgebi seems to have been founded in LH IIIA1,
54 Ibid, 67-69.
55H. Gultekinand M.
Baran,TAD13/2 (1964), 122-23.
56
A. Bammer,AnSt 40 (1990), 146 fig 12, A. Bammer,JOAI
63 (1994), Beiblatt 28-39.
57
See W.-D. Niemeier,Dothan Festschrift,30-34 for the most
recent synopsis.
58
Ibid, 30-3 1.
59
Ibid,31-32.
60 Ibid, 37.
61
Ibid, 33-36.
62 M.
Benzi, Bollettino d'ArteSupplementto 31-32 (1985), 2934.
63
36
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Mountjoy
69
Ibid,304.
700. T. P. K.
Dickinson, The Originsof MycenaeanCivilisation
SIMA49, Gothenburg,1977, 100.
71W.-D. Niemeier, Dothan Festschrift,39.
72
73S.
Voutsaki,Society and Culturein the Mycenaean World:an
analysis of mortuarypractices in the Argolid, Thessalyand the
Dodecanese. UnpublishedCambridgePhD Thesis, 1993, 133.
74
37
Fig 1. The Interface:LH IIIA2-IIIB.Upper and CentralInterface:largely Anatolian wares; Lower Interface:higher
proportionof Mycenaeanpottery
38
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Mountjoy
82
39
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Apollakia
.Scale 1:6
2
Il l I I
Yelandros
Ialysos
Fig 2. The LH IIIA2 South Rhodian Style
40
Mountjoy
41
,:4A?
II
Fig. 3.7. Rhodes, Ialysos: octopus style stirrupjar
42
Mountjoy
1
/
Rhodes:Passia
I
I
2
Kalymnos
Vathy
89
MDP, figs 106-07.
90
Ibid, fig 107.12.
91y.
BSA 83
95 R. E. Jones and C.
Mee, Journal of Field Archaeology 5
92
(1978),461-70.
96Workin progressby H. Mommsen/J.
Maran.
43
Kos: Seraglio
)i7
1I I1 I1 1I1l 1
Rhodes:Ialysos
Troy
Fig 5. LH IIIA2:parallel wavy lines
44
'
Mountjoy
LHIEA1 goblet
111111
Troy
Astyp
alaia: Armenochori
45
TABLE I
HITTITE
(afterGumey 1991)
TROY
MYCENAEAN
LH I
1500---
VId
LH IIA
1460-
---
----
---
---
----
---
---
---
------------------
Vie
LH IIB
VIf
1400 -----------------------------------
LH IIIA1
1375---------LH IIIA2
1300-
---------------
LH IIIB1
1230-----------LH IIIB2
p
A
L
A
T
I
A
L
1370 ArnuwandaI
1355 TudhaliyaIII
1344 SuppiluliumaI
1322 ArnuwandaII
1321 Mursili II
(1318 Raid on Millawanda)
VIh
Destruction
C
E
N
T
RE
S
VIla
E
A
S
T
TransitionalLH IIIB2-IIICEarly
1200---1190-
VIg
Proto-palaces
-- - - - - - - - - - -
?VIIbl
-A---
A
E
G
E
N
LH IIIC Early
VIIbl
1130--------------
?VIIbl-
1295 MuwatalliII
(1275 Battle of Qadesh)
1271 Urhi-Teshub
1264 HattusiliIII
1239 TudhaliyaIV
1209 AmuwandaIII
1205 SuppiluliumaII
K
0
I
LH IIIC Middle
VIIb2
1100---
N
E
1 -~7n-
lU/U-------------------------
LH IIICLate
--------1050/30----Submycenaean
- - -- - ---- -- 1020/1000---------------
VIIb2
?
?
-- -- -- -- - - - - -- -- -
46
Mountjoy
Chronology Table I
The probable deletion of Tudhaliya I and Hattusili II
from the Hittiteking list means thatthe time spanc.14201370 proposedby 0 Gumey98has been lowered on table
I to c. 1390. In Mycenaeanterms this means that the LH
IIB phase no longer applies to Tudhaliya I/II. The
Mycenaeanising sword recently found at Hattusa
referringto the Assuwa campaign of Tudhaliya I/IIand
the campaignitself should now be dated to LH IIIA199.
The date of the destructionof Hattusaand the end of
the Hittite empire are not precisely determinable. The
defeat of the Sea Peoples in Year8 of Rameses III is now
datedto c. 1176100.The fall of Ugaritis put 15 to 20 years
at c.1196/91 because of the diffibefore this by Singer101
culty of extendinghistoricaldocumentationin Ugaritand
Hattusa much beyond 1200 BC, since it would imply
very long reigns for SuppiluliumaII and Ammurapiof
Ugarit, which seems improbable. However, a tablet
found in the burntdestructionof Ugarit contains a letter
from the King of Ugaritto the rulerof Alasiya saying his
troops are in Hatti and his fleet is off the Lukka Lands.
This might suggest that Hattusa fell after Ugarit, not
before it102.
The datingof Troy VId-VIIb2in Mycenaeanterms is
based on my restudyof the potteryexcavated by Blegen
which is stored in the Archaeological Museum,
Istanbul103.
The Kingdom of Ahhiyawa
I list briefly the main mentionsof Ahhiyawain the Hittite
texts. The earliest is the MadduwattaText writtenin the
reign of Arnuwanda I104 concerning the activities of
Attarissiya, a man of Ahhiyawa. Madduwatta lived
under Tudhaliya I/II and Amuwanda I105; this now
indicates a LHIIIA1 or early LHIIIA2 date for
Attarissiya,not LH IIB as was thought106.Points arising
from the text are first, Attarissiyahas a large numberof
chariots. It is unlikely chariotsand horses were brought
from MainlandGreece to Anatolia. This might suggest
980.
Gurney,The Hittites, 1991, table on 181.
107
Ibid.
103
I1thankD. Hawkinsforthisinformation.
W.-D. Niemeier, Dothan Festschrift,32-34.
109See C.
Mee, AnSt 29 (1978), 135 for a summary of the
108
discussionof thiswall andW Schiering,IstMitt29 (1979),8082 for the presenceof a crosswallsuggestingthe fortification
47
1ll J. G. Macqueen,
AnSt18 (1968),168-85.
112
117
To reachthe SehaRiverLandthe Hittiteswouldprobably
have had to pass throughinlandMira (routeAfyon-Banazorfriendlyat
Usak-Kula),
suggestingthatMirawassubservient
thistime.I thankD. Hawkinsforthissuggestion.
"8Ibid,137-38.
119
I. Singer, AnSt 33 (1983), 207.
120H.
19
121
Hoffner,AfO Beiheft
(1982), 130-37.
48
Mountjoy
124
122
49
AnatolianStudies 1998
of Greece. Mycenae is an obvious choice, but Thebes,
situated in the fertile Boeotian plain, was also a very
importantcentre, as has been shown yet again by the
contents of newly found Linear B tablets128.It would
have had one or more harbourson the east coast. lolkos,
which new excavation has now suggested was Dimini
with harbours at Volos and Pefkakia on the Gulf of
Pagasae'29,should not be disregarded. It must be borne
in mind that,if a Mainlandpalatialcentrewas Ahhiyawa,
it is geographically remote from Anatolia for people
escaping to it and for fast communication. Also, the
activities of Attarissiya in southwest Anatolia in LH
IIIA1-IIIA2early, the age of the proto-palacesand the
beginningsof Mycenaeanexpansion,must be linkedto it.
The second option is the Interface. C. Gates has
recently suggested that the Aegean coastal zone,
comprisingall settlementswith Mycenaean-typepottery
and other artefacts, stretchingfrom Menemen down to
Muiisgebiand including Chios, Samos and Rhodes, was
Ahhiyawal30.However, althoughthe potteryand burials
suggest a homogeneous hybrid culture, this does not
imply political unity. And indeed, there are difficulties
attachedto Gates' suggestion, as Menemen,Klazomenae
and Ephesos were part of Arzawa until its defeat in LH
IIIA2, afterwhich Menemenwas in the Seha River Land
and the other two settlementsin Mira (see Hawkins this
volume). However,the Lower Interfacemight qualify as
Ahhiyawa (fig 7). It is well located geographicallyfor
dealings with the west Anatolian states and the Hittites.
Moreover, the Madduwattatext suggests a location in
southwest Anatolia, if Attarissiya was not an
independentfreebooter. The land Karkiyamay already
have existed in inland historic Caria (Hawkins this
volume), but the coastal communities were not necessarily part of it, since they are geographically isolated
from the interior,as indeed are all the sites on the west
Anatoliancoast. Rhodes'31,an importantstagingpost on
the way to the Near East, can be added,as also Anatolian
coastal sites up to, and including, Miletos, togetherwith
128
See C. Shelmerdine,
AJA 101 (1997), 567 withreferences.
A. Adrimi-Sismani,'Mykenaikosoikismos sto Dimeni', in
Conferenceon Ancient Thessaly in Memoryof D. Theocharis,
Athens, 1992, 272-78, A. Evstathiou, 'Neoteres anaskaphikes
erevnes sten evrytere perioche tes Magoulas 'Pevkakia", in
Ibid, 279-85.
130 C. Gates, 'The Mycenaeansand their Anatolianfrontier',in
R. Laffineurand W.-D. Niemeier (eds ) Aegaeum 12 Politeia,
Liege, 1995, 289-98.
129
131
132
Copenhagen,
1988,31-32;M. Benzi,'Mycenaean
potterylater
than LH IIIA1 from the Italianexcavationsat Triandaon
Rhodes',Ibid,39-58.
133
A. Furumark,OpusculaArchaeologica 6 (1950), 150.
134M.
Benzi,'Mycenaean
potterylaterthanLHIIIA1fromthe
Italianexcavationsat Triandaon Rhodes',in S. Dietz andI.
Papachristodoulou (eds) Archaeology in the Dodecanese,
Copenhagen,1988, 53-54.
50
Mountjoy
135
140
139Ibid, 74.
51
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
52
Mountjoy
142
L. Morricone,Annuario50-51 (1972-73),147-49.
W.-D. Niemeier, Dothan Festschrift,34.
144
C. Blegen et al, TroyIV, 3-243.
145
M. Benzi, Bollettino d'ArteSupplementto 31-32 (1985), 32.
146 P. A.
Bulletin of the Instituteof Classical Studies
Mountjoy,
143
Rodi,222-23.
Ibid, 224-25.
155
Rhodes, 90.
156
See RMDPChapter11 Chiosforthe analysisof thepottery
on whichthisconclusionis based.
153
154
157
53
158
54
Mountjoy
I
Rhodes:Apollona
Akave
TObingen
r II I I
Scale 1:6
Heidelberg
body and a ring base instead of the flat base they have on
the Mainland. Based mugs are one such shape (fig 17).
They seem to begin in LH IIIB (fig 17.1-3). These mugs
are found all the way up the Interface,but do not seem to
be present on Rhodes. There is also a LH IIIC Early
example from Astypalaia (unpublished). The threelegged pictorialmug from Miletos (fig 3.5) is also of this
type. The kalathos in the east Aegean is another shape
which may have a carinatedlower body and ring base in
LH IIIB-IIICEarly (fig 18.1-2). In contrastto the based
55
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
J1 Y
I fF
J
k/
Immerwahr,
AgoraXIII,T.7.24pl 40.
172
Thereareexamplesof thebasedalabastron,
forinstanceW.
56
Mountjoy
UIW
Astypalaia: Armenochori
I I I I 1I
Scale 1:6
Rhodes: Pilona
Astypalaia: Armenochori
Fig 12. The East Aegean Koine: 1 amphoroidkrater,2-3 stand
57
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
c 38
3
^
~~~~~~A
~4
___
II
I,
8
Kalymnos: Pothia
rr
II
i
/II
I
II
II
II
10
Kos: Seraglio
Chios: Emporio
58
Mountjoy
Chios: Emporio
Troy
3
Kos:Seraglio
Fig 14. The East Aegean Koine: heavy panelled style
59
Kos:Langada
Kos:Seraglio
. I....-
....:..K.. ..
..
............. ............................................................
...::...i.i..i
l..
.......... ..
........
..
~q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..........
Kalymnos: Pothia
3
Fig 15. The East Aegean Koine: multiple-stemmed spirals
173 Attic: L.
Morricone, Annuario 43-44 (1965-66), Eleona
T.1.2 32-33 figs 4-5.297, Eleona T.15.13 60 fig 32.363,
Minoan:Ibid, Eleona T.7.5 43-44 figs 14-15.330.
174
Rodi, T.80d pl 106f-i.
175
60
Mountjoy
Kos :Langada
Kos: Pizzoli
Not to scale
Not to scale
Troy
Rhodes: Lartos
Kos:Seraglio
11
II
Tr-y
Troy
Troy Tan Ware
Kos:Langada
Dei rmentepe
II
Miletus
Tan Ware
[I I I
De irmentepe
62
Mountjoy
A
Astypalaia
:Armenochori
Rhodes:Ialysos
I II
Degirmentepe
Fig 18. The East Aegean Koine: 1-2 based kalathos, 3 based alabastron
Acknowledgements
This study arises from a paperpresentedin tandemwith
a paper by David Hawkins (this volume) to a joint
meeting of the London Mycenaean Seminar and the
BritishInstituteof Archaeologyat Ankaraon 14 January
1998. I would like to thank Dr D. French for help on
Anatolian questions and Professor D. Hawkins for
guiding me through the maze of Hittite geography and
throughthe varying interpretationsof the Hittite texts.
177
178Rhodes, 89-90.
63
Chios :Emporio
I I III
r?;
16
30
Fl
.. M
... ...-.. ...I . . . ..........
...::.:r
_.
16
_\28
WV
Kos:Seraglio
Kos El eona
Fig 19. The East Aegean Koine: wavy line
64
Scale 1 6
Mountjoy
Rhodes:Vati
Scale 1:6
II I II IJ
Kalymnos: Pothia
Fig 20. The East Aegean Koine: 1 flask, 2 octopus style stirrupjar
65
Figure 10
1) Piriformjar FS 37. Apollona. Rodi, pi 131c. RMDP,
Rhodes no 76
Piriform
2)
jar FS 38. Rhodes Akave Collection.
Annuario 57-58 (1979-80), 234 fig 19, RMDP,
Rhodes no 126
Piriform
3)
jar FS 38. TiibingenMus Inv S/27 5370. CVA
Deutschland 44 Tubingen 2, pl 6.1-2, RMDP,
Rhodes no 125
4) Piriform jar FS 38. Heidelberg Mus Inv Ml. CVA
Deutschland 27 Heidelberg 3, pl 95.5, RMDP,
Rhodes no 127
Figure 3
1) Flask. Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (1972-73), 295 figs
263-64
Flask.
2)
Troy. H. Schmidt, Heinrich Schliemann's
Sammlung trojanischer Altertumer, Berlin, 1902,
167 no 3502
Beaked
3)
jug. Seraglio.Annuario50-51 (1972-73), 176
fig 61 left
4) Stand.Miletos. IstMitt9-10 (1959-60), pl 15
5) Mug. Miletos. IstMitt9-10 (1959-60), pl 16
6) Stirrupjar FS 176. LangadaT.39.6. Annuario 43-44
(1965-66), 188-92 fig 196
7) Stirrupjar FS 176. lalysos T.17.4. Rodi, pl 22c-d
8) Strainerjugs FS 155. lalysos T.17.45,46,44. Rodi, pl
29a-f
Figure 11
1) Amphoroidkrater.AntikensammlungBerlin Mus Inv
31688.21. Degirmentepe
Figure 4
1) Carinatedbowl FS 297. Passia. After S. Dietz, Lindos
IV.1, figs 5,120
bowl FS 297. VathyCave. After M. Benzi,
Carinated
2)
Waceand Blegen, 285 fig 5d, RMDP, Kalymnosno
1
Figure 5
1) Spouted krater FS 298. Seraglio. Annuario 50-51
(1972-73), 381 fig 379b, RMDP, Kos no 40
2) SpoutedkraterFS 298. Rhodes Mus Inv 2935. lalysos
T.4.8. Rodi, pl 2b, RMDP, Rhodes no 71
3) Kylix FS 256. TroyIII, fig 404.3
Figure 6
1) Kylix FS 256. TroyIII, fig 416.5
2) Goblet FS 255. Phylakopi. A. C. Renfrew, The
Archaeology of Cult: the Sanctuary at Phylakopi
BSA SupplementaryVol 18, London, 1985, 160 fig
5.6.74
3) Kylix FS 256. Rhodes Mus Inv 8360. Armenochori.
AD 26B (1971), pl 558c right, RMDP, Astypalaia
no 1
Figure 12
1) Amphoroidkrater.Rhodes Mus Inv 8356. Armenochori.AD 26B (1971), pl 558b right,RMDP,Astypalaia no 7
2) Stand. Rhodes Mus Inv 8358. Armenochori.AD 26B
(1971), pl 558b left, RMDP, Astypalaiano 13
3) Stand.Pilona. After Rodi, pl 162a
Figure 13
1) Amphoroid krater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (197273), 360 fig 358, RMDP, Kos no 104
2) Ring-based kraterFS 282. Seraglio. Annuario 50-51
(1972-73), 360 fig 357a, RMDP, Kos no 170
3) Amphoroid krater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (197273), 360 fig 357b, RMDP, Kos no 103
4) Amphoroidkrater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (197273), 359 fig 356, RMDP, Kos no 102
5) Amphoroidkrater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (197273), 367 fig 365a, RMDP, Kos no 108
6) Ring-based kraterFS 282. Seraglio. Annuario 50-51
(1972-73), 361 fig 359, RMDP, Kos no 173
7) Amphoroid krater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (197273), 364 fig 362, RMDP, Kos no 105
8) Collar-neckedjar FS 63. British Museum Inv A1022.
Pothia.BMC 1.1, pl 16, RMDP, Kalymnosno 14
9) Amphoroid krater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (197273), 188 fig 73, RMDP, Kos no 101
10) Ring-basedkraterFS 282. Emporio.After Chios, 591
fig 265.2745 and pl 119, RMDP, Chios no 8
Figure 14
1) Amphoroid krater. Emporio. Chios, fig 265.2743,
RMDP, Chios no 1
2) Amphoroidkrater.Emporio.After Chios, pl 119.2972,
RMDP, Chios no 2
3) Collar-neckedjar FS 63. TroyIV, fig 279.14
66
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Mountjoy
4) Amphoroidkrater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51
73), 359 fig 355a, RMDP, Kos no 112
5) Piriformjar FS 38. Seraglio. Annuario 50-51
73), 375 fig 375e, RMDP, Kos no 100
6) Amphoroid krater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51
73), 374, fig 374, RMDP, Kos no 117
7) Amphoroid krater.Seraglio. Annuario 50-51
73), 373 fig 373h, RMDP, Kos no 116
Figure 19
1) Hydria FS 128. Emporio. After Chios, pl 124.2837,
RMDP, Chios no 3
2) Deep bowl FS 285. Emporio. Chios, fig 264.2731,
RMDP, Chios no 11
3) Ring-based kraterFS 282. Seraglio. Annuario 50-51
(1972-73), 379 fig 377f, RMDP, Kos no 176
4) Deep bowl FS 285. Seraglio. RMDP, Kos no 184
5) Deep bowl FS 285. Seraglio. RMDP, Kos no 183
6) Ring-based kraterFS 282. Seraglio. RMDP, Kos no
175
Piriform
7)
jar FS 37/58. Eleona T.20.1. Annuario43-44
(1965-66), 74 fig 46, RMDP, Kos no 63
(1972(1972(1972(1972-
Figure 15
1) Piriformjar FS 38. Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (197273), 357 fig 352b-c, RMDP, Kos no 99
2) AlabastronFS 96. Langada T.10.9. Annuario 43-44
(1965-66), 104 fig 85, RMDP, Kos no 123
Kalathos
FS 291. British Museum Inv A1016. Pothia.
3)
BMC 1.1, pl 15, RMDP, Kalymnosno 31
Figure 20
1) Flask FS 186. CopenhagenMus Inv 5771. Vati. CVA
Denmark1 Copenhagen1, pl 48.1, RMDP, Rhodes
no 278
2) Stirrup jar FS 176. British Museum Inv A1015.
Pothia. BMC 1.1, pl 15, RMDP, Kalymnos no 19
Figure 16
1) Mug FS 225. Langada Erratico. Annuario 43-44
(1965-66), 283 fig 324, RMDP, Kos no 30
2) Mug. Pizzoli. After Annuario 50-51 (1972-73), 239
fig 175
3) Mug. TroyIII, fig 416.27,28
4) Mug. Rhodes Mus Inv 3383. Lartos. Rodi, pl 143a,
RMDP, Rhodes no 228
5) Mug. Seraglio. Annuario 50-51 (1972-73), 229 fig
157, RMDP, Kos no 54
6) Mug. TubingenMus Inv S/10 1245. CVADeutschland
44 Tuibingen2, pl 6.6, RMDP, Kos no 164
Figure 17
1) Based mug. Troy. H. Schmidt Heinrich Schliemann's
Sammlung trojanischer Altertiimer, Berlin, 1902,
198 no 4028
2) Based mug. TroyIV, fig 247.28
3) Based mug. Antikensammlung Berlin Mus Inv
31688.8. Degirmentepe
4) Based mug. LangadaErratico.Annuario43-44 (196566), 283 fig 324, RMDP, Kos no 87
5) Based mug. Miletos. After IstMitt29 (1979), 102 fig 6
6) Based mug. Antikensammlung Berlin Mus Inv
31688.24. Degirmentepe. Troja und Thrakien.
Katalog zur Ausstellung,Berlin, 1982, fig 85
Figure 18
1) Based kalathos. AntikensammlungBerlin Mus Inv
31688.6. Degirmentepe. Troja und Thrakien.
Katalog zur Ausstellung,Berlin, 1982, fig 88
2) Based kalathos.Rhodes Mus Inv 8417. Armenochori.
AD 26B (1971), pl 559 bottom left, RMDP, Astypalaia no 12
3) Based alabastron FS 97. Rhodes Mus.Inv.2746.
lalysos T.17.25. Rodi, pl.27g, RMDP, Rhodes
no.169.
Abbreviations
The following special abbreviationsare used in the text:
BMC 1.1 = Catalogue of the Greek and Etruscan Vases
in the British Museum: Vol 1, Part 1: Prehistoric
Aegean Pottery, J. Forsdyke.London 1925
Boysal = Katalog der Vasen im Museum in Bodrum:L.
Mykenisch-Protogeometrisch,Y. Boysal. Ankara
1969
Chios = Prehistoric Emporio and Ayia Gala II BSA
SupplementaryVol 16, S. Hood. London 1982
Dothan Festschrift = Mediterranean Peoples in
Transition,in Honor of TrudeDothan eds S. Gitin,
A. Mazar,E. Stem. Jerusalem1998
FS = FurumarkShape.MycenaeanPottery:Analysis and
Classification,A. Furumark.Stockholm 1941
MDP = Mycenaean Decorated Pottery: a Guide to
Identification SIMA 73, P. A. Mountjoy.
Gothenburg1986
PoDIA = Proceedings of the Danish Instituteat Athens
Rhodes = Rhodes in the Bronze Age, C. B. Mee.
Warminster1982
RMDP = Regional MycenaeanDecorated Pottery, P. A.
Mountjoy.In press
Rodi = Rodi e la Civilta Micenea, M. Benzi. Rome 1992
67
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:59:28 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions