Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Maintaining power system frequency at constant value is very important for the health of
the power generating equipment and the utilization equipment at the customer end. The
job of automatic frequency regulation is achieved by governing systems of individual
turbine-generators and Automatic Generation Control (AGC) or Load frequency control
( LFC) system of the power system.
2.0 FREQUENCY VARIATION IN A SINGLE MACHINE
To understand the variation of frequency in a power system, we can consider a single
machine connected to an isolated load, as shown in the figure below.
Turbine
Gen
Pl
Pm
Fig.1 SINGLE TURBINE GENERATOR WITH LOAD
Normally, the turbine mechanical power (Pm) and the electrical load power (Pl) are
equal. Whenever there is a change in load, with mechanical power remaining the same
the speed () of the turbine generator changes as decided by the rotating inertia (M) of
the rotor system, as given by the following differential equation..
Pm-Pl = M [d/dt ]
The governing system senses this change in speed and adjusts steam control valve so
that mechanical power (Pm) matches with the changed load (Pl). Speed variation stops
but at a different steady value. The change in frequency () at steady state can be
described using the following equation in terms of change in load ( Pl) and a factor R
called speed regulation or droop.
= - [ Pl ]( R)
A 20 % change in load ( Pl = 0.2 per unit) causes 1 % change in frequency ( = 0.01
p.u) with a per unit (p.u) droop value of 0.05. Similarly full load throw off ( Pl = - 1.0)
causes 5 % change in speed. ( = + 0.05). This is described by the well known droop
characteristic.
52 5
Frequency
(Hz)
5% Droop
50
0%
Fig.2
100%
50%
Load
Speed
(%)
100%
TSR
(6 - 10%)
0%
t
5% Droop
100%
Time(sec)
Fig 3 LOAD REJECTION RESPONSE
In the speed control system block diagram shown in Fig. 4, when elec. load changes,
reference set point is to be adjusted to restore speed to the pre-disturbed value. This is
equivalent to shifting the speed droop characteristic to match the new operating load as
shown in Fig. 5.
Pref
SET
POINT
GOVERNOR
ROTOR
INERTIA
TURBINE
Valve
Position
Mechanical
Power
Elec.
load
S
P
E
E
D
Operating point
shifted to 50 %
Frequency
(Hz)
50
0%
Fig.5
50%
100%
Load
machines sense the frequency and the mechanical power outputs will be changed
automatically to match the combined generation with the new combined load. This action
is called primary regulation.
But frequency remains at a new value and set points must be adjusted, just as in single
machine case for frequency restoration. This job is done by the Automatic Load
Frequency controller (ALFC) as shown in Fig. 7. This process of set point adjustment is
called secondary regulation.
When load change occurs frequency varies and the regulation initially for the first few
seconds is due to the action of the governors of all generating units and subsequently the
Load frequency control system prevails.
Pref
Composite
Governor
Composite
Turbine
Power System
Inertia
Combined
Mechanical
Power
Frequency
Total Elec.
load
Set point
To
Other
Machines
Generator
Other m/c
Power
Total
Load
Set point
Governor
Secondary regulation
AUTOMATIC
LOAD REQUENCY
CONTROLLER
Turbine
GRID
INERTIA
Frequency
Area
Frequency
Total Generation
Primary regulation
stations under the control of States and the generating companies like NTPC, NHPC. The
Regional Load Despatch Centers (RLDC) function under Power Grid Corporation of
India. So, for the purpose of frequency each region can be considered as one coherent
unit. For instance Southern RLDC comprises AP, TN, Karnataka, Kerala and Goa.
SRLDC is located in Bangalore.
For the load frequency control, the generating units at Hydro power plant are normally
adjusted as the response is faster to raise/lower the power. Thermal power plants have
rate limitations due to thermal stresses. But all units are expected to participate in
primary regulation.
Load Generation imbalance causes frequency variation. Load is never constant. Precise
frequency control is possible only if there is a surplus generating capacity, which is not
the case in many states. Hence load shedding is resorted to for frequency management.
There is no AUTOMATIC load frequency control in many regions as many utilities want
to generate to the maximum possible extent and would not like their generation levels
adjusted by ALFC. Mostly manual control is only exercised to maintain frequency.
In many cases, generators are not allowed to participate in primary regulation also i.e.,
the natural tendency of the governors to raise/ lower generation when frequency falls/
rises is suppressed. With the result, frequency is always less than the rated value of 50
Hz. When sudden disturbances occur, system collapses causing blackouts. The situation
has vastly improved in the recent years after the introduction of availability cased tariff
(ABT) and free governor mode of operation (FGMO) regimes.
6.0 FREE GOVERNOR MODE OF OPERATION (FGMO)
To maintain grid discipline, all generating units shall have their governors in free
operation (natural governing ) at all times.
In Indian grid code the following specifications are given.
The rated System frequency is 50 Hz and the target range for control should be 49.0 Hz
50.0 Hz the statutory acceptable limits are 48.5 - 51.5Hz.
Each operating machine should pick up load as below:
Up to MCR: 5% extra load for at least 5 minutes.
Above MCR :105 % of MCR
Facility available like load limiters, ATRS etc, shall not be used to suppress
natural governor action in any manner
All governors shall have a droop of between 3% and 6%.
No dead band or time delays should be deliberately introduced
Ramping back to the previous MW level (in case the increased output level can
not be sustained) shall not be faster than 1% per minute.
At 49 Hz, all constituents shall resort to adequate manual load shedding instantly,
Operating frequency should not touch such level, which may trigger Under
Frequency Relay (UFR) operation; as UFR actuated shedding is meant only for
taking care of contingencies like sudden losses of bulk generation etc.
The recommended rate for changing the governor setting, i.e., supplementary
control for increasing or decreasing the output (generation level) for all generating
units, irrespective of their type and size, would be one (1.0) per cent per minute or
as per manufacturers limits.
However, if frequency falls below 49.5 Hz, all partly loaded generating units shall
pick up additional load at a faster rate, according to their capability.
SCHEME OF FGMO.
FGMO WORKS WITHIN THE LOAD SET PT
LIMITS OF 175 MW TO 220 MW ONLY
CMC LOAD ST. PT.
CMC MAX LOAD
LIMIT. ( 220 MW)
LOAD CORRECTION
DUE TO FREQ. +/- 20 MW
MIN.
LOAD SET POINT.
CORRECTION
DUE TO PR.
VARIATIONS
LOAD
CORRECTION OF
+/- APPOX 2.5 MW
FOR +/- 1 KG/CM2
BOILER FUEL
CONTROL.
MIN
TURBINE
CONTROL.
TURB MAX
LOAD LIMIT.
(220 MW)
The Coordinated Master Control ( CMC) scheme gives commands to the turbine
control as well as the boiler fuel control to raise/lower generation. When frequency
changes these command signals are modified with a limit of plus or minus 20MW as
shown below in Fig.9.
In case CMC is not there FGMO can be implemented in the Load control loop of the
electro hydraulic turbine controller (EHTC).
Fig.9
+20 MW
48Hz
49Hz
50
51 Hz
52 Hz
- 20 MW
When frequency changes, under primary regulation, governors respond immediately. But as mentioned
earlier, frequency does not get restored but will settle down at a different value. At this point of time LFC
function comes in to the picture.LFC maintains the system frequency by performing the function of
Secondary Regulation. It provides generation set points to the generators participating in the frequency
regulation. But these set points may not be the optimum from cost point of view. Economic dispatch (ED)
function readjusts the set points of the generations after the time scale of LFC.
In a large interconnected power system there are a number of areas connected by tie lines with share
agreements with neighbors. The LFC and ED functions have to take care of these agreements. This
function is performed by Interchange Scheduling (IS).. Each of these areas is responsible for generating
enough power to meet its own customers or "native load." By keeping the generated power equal to the
power consumed by the load, utilities keep the overall system frequency at 50 Hz. Not only must areas
adjust their generation to meet their own changing native load, but they must also maintain any
scheduled tie-line transactions. It is possible, by monitoring both the tie-line flow and the system frequency
to determine the proper generation action (raise or lower). Thus, electric utilities use an automatic
generation control (AGC) system to balance their moment-to-moment electrical generation to load
within a given control area.
The current practice of the load frequency control (LFC) function of automatic generation control (AGC) is
based on a strategy known as tie-line bias control. In this control strategy each area of an interconnected
system tries to regulate its area control error (ACE) to zero, where:
The term (T,-T, ) is the difference between the actual and the schleduled net interchange on the tie lines.
The term representing the area's natural response to frequency deviations is lOp(f,-f,). The coefficient, p, is
known as the system natural response coefficient. It is difficult to obtain an accurate value of p since it
depends on the governor reslponse capability of the generating units presently on-line and the frequency
dependence of the constantly changing load. This characteristic is expressed as:
where, (1/R) is the generator regulation or droop, D is the load damping Characteristic.
Prefi = -ACEi
LFC Implementation
Frequency
Measured
At a central
Location
~ every 4 sec
Net Interchange
Desired
Frequency
ACE
Filters
Allocation
To Plants
Other Considerations
Economic Dispatch
Actual Unit Movement
Minimum Movement
Pref
To Units
~ every 4 sec
Severity
Unit Energy Balance
Response Rate
Time error
In the modern Energy Management Systems (EMS) automatic load frequency control
system (ALFC) is part of Automatic Generation Control (AGC).
In power systems, where automatic control does not exist, manual control of set points is
done on instructions from dispatch center.
In this response curve taken from published literature, a loss of generation has resulted in
a frequency fall from 60.01 Hz to 59.209 Hz and due to governor actions (primary
regulation), frequency starts increasing and it should have settled around 59.75 Hz as
shown
below.
10
The AGC implemented in developed countries includes load frequency control (LFC),
economic dispatch (ED) and interchange scheduling (IS). These are implemented as
application programs in Energy Management System (EMS) software located in Energy
Control Centers. (ECC).
The implementation scheme for AGC is shown in Fig. 14 .The AGC function within
SCADA/EMS will receive frequency, generations (MW) etc., signals through remote
terminal units (RTUs).
Frequency
(f)
Generation Signals
(MW)
Telemetry
Set Point
Electro
Hydraulic
Governor
(EHG)
-----Energy
Management
System
(EMS)
-Automatic
Generation
Control (AGC)
f
Set Point
Electro
Hydraulic
Governor
(EHG)
TurbineGenerator
(TG)
Set Point
f
Electro
Hydraulic
Governor
(EHG)
SYSTEM CONTROL
CENTER (SCC)
TurbineGenerator
(TG)
f
Set Point
System Frequency
TurbineGenerator
(TG)
Electro
Hydraulic
Governor
(EHG)
TurbineGenerator
(TG)
11
computer based Energy Management System (EMS) installed in modern power systems
includes AGC also.
The concepts of Free governor mode of operation (FGMO) and implementation are also
described.
9.0 REFERENCES
1. Frequency Control Concerns In The North American Electric Power System
December 2002 by B. J. Kirby, J. Dyer, C. Martinez, Dr. Rahmat A. Shoureshi
R. Guttromson, J. Dagle, December 2002, ORNL Consortium for Electric Reliability
Technology Solutions
2. N. Jaleeli, D.N. Ewart, and L.H. Fink, Understanding Automatic Generation Control,
IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 7, No. 3 August 1992, pp. 1106- 1122.
3. A.J. Wood and B.F. Wollenberg, Power Generation, Operation, & Control, John
Wiley & Sons, 1984.
4. R.L. King and R. Luck, Intelligent Control Concepts for Automatic Generation
Control of Power Systems, NSF Annual Report ECS-92-16549, March 31, 1995.
5. P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, The EPRI Power System Engineering
Series, McGraw-Hill, 1994
6. C. Concordia, F. P. deMello, L.K. Kirchmayer and R. P. Schulz, "Effect of PrimeMover Response and Governing Characteristics on System Dynamic Performance,"
American Power Conference, 1966, Vol. 28, pp. 1074-85, IEEE transactions on Power
Systems, Vol. XX, 1999
7. Dynamic Analysis of Generation Control Performance Standards Tetsuo Sasaki,
Kazuhiro Enomoto
8. Nasser Jaleeli, Louis S. VanSlyck: NERCS NEW CONTROL PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems,Vol.14,No.3,pp.1092-1099,1999
9. North American Electric Reliability Council, NERC Operating Manual, Policy 10,
available at http://www.nerc.com.
12