Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investigation of Self-Excited Induction Generators For Wind Turbine Applications
Investigation of Self-Excited Induction Generators For Wind Turbine Applications
NREL/CP-500-26713
Investigation of Self-Excited
Induction Generators for Wind
Turbine Applications
NOTICE
The submitted manuscript has been offered by an employee of the Midwest Research Institute (MRI), a
contractor of the US Government under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337. Accordingly, the US
Government and MRI retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published
form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes.
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees,
makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,
completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents
that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial
product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily
constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any
agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect
those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov/bridge
Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 20% postconsumer waste
Jesus Sallan*
Charles P. Butterfield #
Mariano Sanz*
I. INTRODUCTION
Thyristor
bridge
P = 0.5AC p V 3
[1]
P = K p rpm3
[2]
Rs
Is
ZL
Vt
Ys
Xs fpu
Rr
Xm fpu
Xlr fpu
Rr (1-s)/s
Ym
Re(Ys ) +
Im(Ys ) +
[3]
Yr =
Rr
s
2
Rr
2
+ (X lr f pu )
s
X lr f pu
2
Rr
2
+ (X lr f pu )
s
Rr
2
+ (X lr f pu )
s
[4]
X lr f pu
[5]
Lm (Henry)
0.293
0.2
0.133
0.1
[6]
1
=0
X m f pu
L
Induction
machine
0.2
0.015
FLUX
m
Flux (Volt/(rad/s))
[7]
1
Xm
L
m
Rr
2
+ (X lr f pu )
Ym = j
=0
Yr
Ys = Re(Ys ) + j Im(Ys )
Rr
s
0.4
0.398
C
Thyristor bridge
600
6
RL=210ohm, C=70uF
power (watt)
500
400
RL is varied to track
Pideal, C=70uF
300
200
Pideal
100
4
3
2
1
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
frequency (Hz)
frequency (Hz)
Ys = (Z Load + Z s ) 1
[8]
Z Load =
1
1
+ jC
RL
Z s = R s + jX ls f pu
[9]
[10]
0.6
0.5
R L and C are varied to track P ideal
and to keep Is < Irated
0.4
Lm (H)
0.3
0.2
RL =210 ohm, C=70uF
0.1
RL is varied to track
Pideal, C=70uF
0
35
40
45
50
55
frequency (Hz)
60
2
Stator current (A)
V. SERIES-PARALLEL COMPENSATION
The system configuration for series-parallel compensation
is shown in Figure 8. In this configuration, both the series
capacitor C2 and the parallel capacitor C affect the level of
excitation. The series capacitance C2 helps to increase the
level of excitation and counteracts the voltage drop across the
stator resistance and stator leakage inductance.
C2
Induction
Machine
Utility
C
Thyristor bridge
Z Load =
1
1
+
.
1
j C 2
+ j C
RL
(5)
1.1
0.8
1200
1400
1600
1800
Figure 10. Stator current versus rpm for a seriesparallel excitation induction machine
induction generator to counteract the main magnetizing
winding Lm, which size varies with the level of saturation.
A steady-state analysis is performed to understand the
behavior of the system. The compensation chosen is the
parallel capacitor C=40 F and the series compensation
capacitor C2=150 F). As in the previous section, the power
converter is simulated by an adjustable resistive load RL.
Apparently, a normal operating condition can be achieved by
using this pair of capacitance values. The ideal power can be
achieved and the stator current stays below the rated value in
the entire range of operation.
In Figure 9, the output power of the generator (solid line)
and Pideal (dashed line) are shown. The system can track the
ideal power for a wide range of operating frequencies.
In Figure 10, the stator current as a function of the
frequency is shown. Note that the stator current stays within
the rated value in the entire range of operation.
The level of excitation can be shown by the variation of
inductance Lm as the frequency is varied. This variation is
shown in Figure 11. Comparing Figure 11 and Figure 7, it is
clear that the series compensation can satisfactorily maintain
the level of saturation. It is shown that in the lower
frequency, the saturation level is very low and the stator
current required to track the ideal power is also low. Thus
both the iron losses and the copper losses are low in the low
frequency, which indicates that the operation of the system is
efficient even in the lower frequency region.
200
100
1.4
0.5
1000
Lm (Henry)
Power (watt)
300
1.7
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0.25
0.2
40
50
60
frequency (Hz)
Figure 11. Magnetizing inductance (in H) versus
frequency for series-parallel excited generator
Thus, if the upper limit is set to Prated, the lower limit that is
50% of the rated speed will generate about 1/8 (12.5%) of the
rated power.
150
voltage drop
across reactance
120
Xc
i
Xls
Xls
i
90
60
reactance
30
0
40
50
60
f
i
Figure 14a shows the phase voltage and line current in the
generator when working in rated conditions. The voltage
waveform is affected by the current distortion. Figure 14b,
shows the frequency spectrum of the current waveform. The
current waveform contains minimal harmonic components.
The parallel capacitors at the output terminal across the
diode bridge filters the harmonics current entering the
generator. It is expected that the harmonic losses due to
current harmonics is reduced significantly. The torque
pulsation which is normally associated with current
harmonics is expected to be very small as well. The effect of
torque pulsation on the speed fluctuation is further reduced
by the fact that the blade inertia is very large compare to
normal load. Thus the rotor speed fluctuation due to
harmonics is barely be noticeable.
200
150
100
50
(a)
0
0
10
20
30
40
-50
-100
Vgen (V)
50*I(A)
-150
-200
t (ms)
0.25
0.20
(b)
0.15
Igen
Is . Xc
i
i
0.10
250
0.05
Power (ideal)
Power (test)
200
0.00
150
(W)
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
t(s)
100
50
0
200
1200
1700
Speed (rpm)
250
VI. CONCLUSIONS
200
150
100
50
(a)
0
-50
10
20
30
40
-100
-150
-200
Vline (V)
50*Iline(A)
-250
t (ms)
0 .2 5
0 .2 0
0 .1 5
Iline
(b)
0 .1 0
VII. ACKNOWLEDMENTS
0 .0 5
0 .0 0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
f (H z)
1.
2.
3.
4.