You are on page 1of 21

From: (b) (6)

To: (b) (6)


Subject: Fw: VF-300 types
Date: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 11:25:06 AM

Fyi

----- Original Message -----


From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)

Sent: Fri Feb 29 17:13:00 2008


Subject: VF-300 types

(b) (6)

Please find attached Yuma Sector's justification for fence design....

If you have any question, please give me a call or email

Thanks
(b) (6)
Special Operations Supervisor
SBInet
Yuma Sector
(b) (6)

----- Original Message -----


From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)

Cc: (b) (6)


Sent: Thu Feb 28 10:48:08 2008
Subject: FW: VF-300 types

All,

We are reaching out to each of your sectors to verify what type of vehicle fence design you require in
your AOR’s. I’ve attached a spread sheet that identifies map ID and planned mileage. Would you please
fill in the block that stipulates fence type and send it back to me. Please keep in mind that the design
should be operationally driven. If you anticipate that your vehicle fence may need to incorporate
pedestrian fence in the future because of operations then VF-1 (rail on post) should be selected over
VF-2 (Normandy style). Consequently if the terrain is harsh and rocky, severely sloped, sandy soil, etc.
then VF-2 may be the best choice. You guys know your area’s better than most, so we are depending
on your input to ensure you get what you need for your sectors.
Lastly, I will need a brief justification for the designs you picked (VF-1 or VF-2) for each map ID, as well
as why VF was preferred over PF or no fencing in those areas,for future GAO audits.

Thanks

(b) (6)

(A)SOS

Office of Border Patrol

Tactical Infrastructure Branch

1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,

Washington, D.C. 20229

(b) (6)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Parts of this document may contain sensitive security information
that is controlled under the provisions of 49 CFR 1520. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
(Cum.) Military Comm.
Congres Planned Planned Mileage mileage
sional Contingency Core left to left to
Map ID SBI Project # Location District Mileage Mileage construct construct
Previous
Projects 51 5.22 0.0 0.0
SDC SECTOR TOTAL 0.00 5.2
BV-1 2248-1 ELC/ELS 51 11.3 0.0 11.3
Previous
Projects 51 10.8 0.0 0.0
ELC SECTOR TOTAL 0.00 22.2

CV-1a 2201-1 YUM/YUM River Corridor 7 6.84 0.00 6.84

CV-1b 2201-2 YUM/YUM River Corridor 7 6.46 0.00 6.46

CV-3 1053-3 YUM/WEL Cabeza Prieta 7 22.48 0.00 22.48

CV-2 1053-4 YUM/WEL Cabeza Prieta 7 10.56 0.00 10.56


YUM SECTOR TOTAL 0.00 46.3

DV-1 2202-1 TCA/AJO Cabeza Prieta 7 15.54 0.00 0.00

Papago
DV-3a 1023-4 TCA/AJO Farms 7 15.48 0.00 9.74
Papago
DV-3b 1023-5 TCA/AJO Farms 7 0.41 0.4 0.0

EV-1 2204-1 TCA/SON Sonoita 8 14.81 7.83 0.0

Tohono
O'Odham
DV-4a 1024-3 TCA/CAG Nation 7 19.36 0.00 19.36
Tohono
O'Odham
DV-4b 1024-4 TCA/CAG Nation 7 12.94 3.84 0.00
FV-1a 2203-1 TCA/DGL Douglas 8 2.00 2.00 0.00

FV-1b 2203-2 TCA/DGL Douglas 8 6.78 10.66 0.00 17.44

Sierra De La
DV-2 2205-1 TCA/AJO Nariz Mtn. 7 1.52 0.00 1.52
DV-5 2206-1 TCA/TUC Baboquivari 7 3.03 0.00 3.03
Previous
Projects 7 45.28 0.00 0.00
Previous
Projects 8 13.13 0.00 0.00
TCA SECTOR TOTAL 6.78 154.2

HV-1 2212-1 EPT/LOB PVB Zone 1 2 3.79 3.79

HV-2 2211-1 EPT/LOB PVB Zone 2 2 6.65 6.65

HV-3 2215-1 EPT/LOB PVB Zone 3 2 5.80 5.80

HV-4 2210-1 EPT/LOB PVB Zone 4 2 5.98 5.98

HV-5 2217-1 EPT/LOB PVB Zone 5 2 14.99 14.99

HV-6 2214-1 EPT/LOB PVB Zone 6 2 10.43 10.43

HV-7 2213-1 EPT/LOB PVB Zone 7 2 15.86 15.86

HV-8 2216-1 EPT/LOB PVB Zone 8 2 4.85 4.85


PVB/TVB W.
IV-1 EPT/DNM Zone 9 2 1.54 1.54

IV-2 EPT/DNM PVB Zone 9 2 12.80 12.80

IV-3 1006-1 EPT/DNM 2 0.00

IV-4 1005-1 EPT/DNM PVB Zone 12 2 5.69 4.86

JV-1 2207-1 EPT/STN PVB Zone 13 2 18.06 18.06

JV-2 2208-1 EPT/STN PVB Zone 14 2 11.82 11.82

JV-3 2209-1 PVB Zone 15


EPT/STN 2 12.04 12.04
Jersey Barrier
KV-1 1052-2 EPT/YST POE 16 0.04 0.04
Previous
Projects 2 20.4
EPT SECTOR TOTAL 51.46 99.3
Cajones
LV-1 2221-1 MAR/SBT Crossing 23 0.23
Indian Hot
LV-2 2220-1 MAR/SBT Springs 23 2.00
Cieneguilla
LV-3 2219-1 MAR/SBT Crossing 23 0.11
Bosque
LV-4 2218-1 MAR/SBT Crossing 23 0.11
Jaime
Barrow's
LV-5 2223-1 MAR/VHT Crossing 23 0.23
Cubano River
LV-6 2222-1 MAR/VHT Crossing 23 0.23
Emilio
Carranza
LV-7 2229-1 MAR/MRS Crossing 23 0.50
Por Venir
LV-8 2226-1 MAR/MRS Crossing 23 0.50
Diez Y Ocho
LV-9 2227-1 MAR/MRS Crossing 23 0.50
Los Fresnos
LV-10 2230-1 MAR/MRS Crossing 23 1.00
Comedor
LV-11 2228-1 MAR/MRS Crossing 23 0.50
Cable
LV-12 2224-1 MAR/MRT Crossing 23 0.29
Ruidosa
LV-13 2225-1 MAR/MRS Crossing 23 0.03
Faulkner
LV-14 2240-1 MAR/PRS Crossing 23 0.05
Borracho
LV-15 2241-1 MAR/PRS Creek 23 0.02
LV16 2247-1 MAR/PRS Soza 23 0.04

LV-17 2242-1 MAR/PRS Estrada Farm 23 0.19


LV-18 2246-1 MAR/PRS Polvo 23 0.06
Broken
LV-19 2245-1 MAR/PRS Windmill 23 0.06
LV-20 2244-1 MAR/PRS Levario 23 0.08
LV-21 2243-1 MAR/PRS Conover 23 0.06
Lajitas
LV-22 2239-1 MAR/APT Crossing 23 0.23
Santa Elena
LV-23 2235-1 MAR/APT Crossing 23 0.23
Talley
LV-24 2232-1 MAR/APT Crossing 23 0.23
Solis
LV-25 2233-1 MAR/APT Crossing 23 0.23
San Vicente
LV-26 2234-1 MAR/APT Crossing 23 0.23
Boquillas
LV-27 2236-1 MAR/APT Crossing 23 0.23
Stillwell
LV-28 2237-1 MAR/APT Crossing 23 0.23
La Linda
LV-29 2231-1 MAR/APT Bridge 23 0.23
Horse
Canyon
LV-30 2238-1 MAR/APT Crossing 23 0.23
MAR SECTOR TOTAL 8.84 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
DRT SECTOR TOTAL 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
LRT SECTOR TOTAL 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
RGV SECTOR TOTAL 0.0
TOTALS 83.01 326.2
Existing Existing 22-Feb
Mobile Fixed Cum.
Vehicle Vehicle Actual
Fence Fence Mileage Perf. Fence Type

0.0 5.2 5.2 N/A


0.0 5.2 5.2
0.0 0.0 0.0

10.8 10.8 N/A


10.8 0.0 10.8
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Post on Rail
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Post on Rail
Post on Rail/
0.0 2.0 2.0 Sundt Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Post on Rail
0.0 2.0 2.0

0.0 15.4 15.4 Sundt Post on Rail

Comm.
0.0 4.8 4.8 TBD Bollard
Miltary
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy

7.3 0.0 7.3 OJS Normandy

Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Post on Rail

3.4 2.5 6.0 OJS Post on Rail


0.0 0.0 0.0 OJS Post on Rail

Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Post on Rail

Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Post on Rail
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Post on Rail

12.7 32.5 45.3 N/A

11.5 1.7 13.1 N/A


34.9 57.0 91.9
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy

Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
already
0.0 0.0 0.0 built Normandy
Miltary.
0.0 1.2 1.2 TBD Post on Rail
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Comm.
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Normandy
Milary. Jersey
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD Barrier

1.8 19.6 20.4 N/A


1.8 20.8 21.6

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD


0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD


0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD


0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD


0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD
0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD


0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD

0.0 0.0 0.0 TBD


0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
47.6 85.0 132.6
Issues/Status

need ibwc approval

need ibwc approval. Cultural Issues need mitigation.

Construction Underway. Posts and Concrete currently being


installed, mileage needs to be tracked by OBP.

Requires EA - requires waiver

Contract awarded to Sundt .

All environmental compliance complete. Request has been made


by OBP for bollard design which is being worked into the toolkit.

SEA to be completed in conjuction with DV-2

EA for roads and some TVB exists should be supplemented / 106


and ESA need to be completed also.
Environmental and Real Estate Clear. Commercial Construction
of Post on Rail. Option to be created to pick up the extra mileage
not completed under DV-4b (OJS is projecting to complete DV-4b
by 1 July 2008).
Military (NG) labor; Materials, & large equipment provided via
contract. Equipment scheduled to be turned in by mid-June.

10 miles of 21 miles requested is constructable. Incentive may be


included in this contract for contract duration. EA/106/ESA
needed

Supplemental EA/106/ESA needed. ROE S&E letters have gone


out to landowners.
ROE S&E letters have been sent, Resolution for TON land is
underway.

NTP given 28 Jan for cultural resources site survey; contract will
most likely need to be design build. ROE for S&E being finalized
by USBP.

EA complete, FONSI needed.

Currently under construction by OJS military labor.


Detailed Location Description Real Estate Status

1.5mi W of Pinto Wash to Mon 225

Moralas Dam south 7 miles


1900' private lands, 23,050' Fed,
County 18 Street north 6.5 miles 58,400' Cocopah Nation

International Border and Yuma County Line 22 miles west Fed

Eastern edge of BMGR, East 14 miles Fed

West Edge of Organ Pipe 15.5 miles to Yuma County Line (Yuma PDT) Fed
Starting at 1.52 miles east of Border Monument 159. Continuing east
along the border for 15.26 miles, On the Tohono O'odham Indian
Reservation, between the Santa Rosa Mountains and the La Lesna
Mountains.
La Lesna Mountain Drive Through Area

Starting at 0.38 miles east of Border Monument 114. Continuing east


along the border for 24.37 miles. In Coronado National Forest, from Mt Fed
Starting at 0.37 miles east of Border Monument 153. Continuing east
along the border for 20.84 miles, On the Tohono O'odham Indian
Reservation between the La Lesna Mountains and the eastern edge of
Morena Mountain. TON
Starting at 0.29 miles west of Border Monument 145. Continuing east
along the border for 11.55 miles, On the Tohono O'odham Indian
Reservation between corral and the Presumido Canyon. TON
Starting at 0.07 miles west of Border Monument 83. FV-1A runs for Fed
2.35 miles east along the border to Monument 81. FV-1B runs from
Border Monument 81 east along the border for 21.41 miles, through the
San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, to the Ne Fed
Starting at .87 miles east of Border Monument 160. Continuing east
along the border for 1.29 miles. On the Tohono O'odham Indian
Reservation, between the Sierra la Nariz Mountains and the Santa
Rosa Mountains.
Starting at 5.214 miles east of Border Monument 142A. Continuing east
along the border for 3.03 miles,. Along the eastern edge of the Tohono
O'odham Indian Reservation and along the Pozo Verde Mountains,
ending 2.48 miles west of the Sasabe POE. Fed

BM 65 to BM 68

BM 62 through eastern slope of sierra de san luis mtns

Antelope Wells POE 6 Miles of VF - 3 Miles East, 3 Miles West

VF From 0.25 Miles East of BM39 East Past BM 33 - 12.85 Miles State & Fed (BLM)

West of Columbus POE


5.75 Miles of PVF East of Columbus POE [Starting 7 Miles East of POE
to East side of AR#6] State & Fed (BLM)

VF From East Side of AR#6 East to 413 Road [CR004] - 18 Miles State & Fed (BLM)

VF from 413 Road [CR004] East to BM7 - 12 Miles State & Fed (BLM)
9.9 Miles of VF West of STN POE [Starting 1.25 Miles West of POE to
BM7] State & Fed (BLM)
City of El Paso for access, IBWC
180 LF VF Under Ysleta POE Bridge for staging
Environmental
Status
VF-300

CV-1a

This project is from Morelos Dam south approximately six miles and is entirely within
the Colorado River flood plane. Infrastructure added to this area must not disrupt the
flow of water in the event of a flood. In addition, the International Boundary and Water
Commission (IBWC) on both the U. S. and Mexican sides must approve the design of the
planned infrastructure. Exhaustive research and planning revealed that the post on rail
design (VF-1) would be the most durable and least intrusive solution.

CV-1b

This project is the extension of CV-1a and also lies entirely in the Colorado River flood
plane however, this project is also within the Cocopah Indian Reservation. In addition to
the IBWC treaty and flood issues, this land is sovereign and the project design requires
the approval of the Cocopah Tribe. Meetings with the tribe regarding the design resulted
in the decision to use post on rail as it was the least intrusive physically as well as
visually.

CV-2

This project covers approximately ten miles on the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife
Refuge. This is an environmentally and archeologically sensitive area, and a design with
the least amount of impact to the area was needed. Lengthy discussions with the United
Stated Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Land Management revealed that post and
rail is the more durable, permanent solution and still allows for the natural migration of
native wildlife.

CV-3

This project covers approximately twenty miles and is also completely contained within
the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge. As in CV-2, the area is sensitive and needs
the least intrusive design however; this portion also contains many rocky hills and
mountains. These hills and mountains pose a significant challenge to drilling the
necessary holes for the post and rail design. The Normandy style (VF-2) alleviates this
challenge and can be placed in such a way so that vehicles may not easily traverse the
sides of the obstacle.

You might also like