As teacher of philosophy we made a mistake when we choose a more dificult metodology, when we could define our activity in a more ease way: to search a conected series of why of why of why of why untill reach complete answers in place of those short, fast and incomplete answers, that we are used to heard and read
As teacher of philosophy we made a mistake when we choose a more dificult metodology, when we could define our activity in a more ease way: to search a conected series of why of why of why of why untill reach complete answers in place of those short, fast and incomplete answers, that we are used to heard and read
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
As teacher of philosophy we made a mistake when we choose a more dificult metodology, when we could define our activity in a more ease way: to search a conected series of why of why of why of why untill reach complete answers in place of those short, fast and incomplete answers, that we are used to heard and read
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
We can synthesize philosophy in one sentence: it is the pursuit of
the whys of the whys of the whys of the whys of the whys of the whys of the whys of the whys, etc, trying to reach a final why and a final answer. Do we need to explain more? _____________________ Antonio Jaques de Matos Teacher of Philosophy