German court documents in a child custody case. Stefanie Gardner, awarded sole custody by the German court, is wanted on international parental kidnapping charges in the United States.
German court documents in a child custody case. Stefanie Gardner, awarded sole custody by the German court, is wanted on international parental kidnapping charges in the United States.
German court documents in a child custody case. Stefanie Gardner, awarded sole custody by the German court, is wanted on international parental kidnapping charges in the United States.
sie zee 8: 88
inwilligungserklarang
: Hiermit gebe ich meine uneingeschrankte Einwilligung, dai
“reine Frau Stefanie Gardner geb. Zachariadis, geb.
17.09.1974 und die Kinder Alec Emmanuel Gardner, geb
19.09.2001 und Dominic Vincent Gardner, geb. 05.07.2003
ihren gewdhnlichen Wohnsitz zukiinftig in
nehmen. _
Declaration of conseat
herby declare my unreserved consent that my wife, Stefanie
Gardnes, born on September 17, 1974 and the children, Alec
Emmanuel Gardner, born on September 19°, 2001 and
Dominic Vincent Gardner, born on May 7, 2003, take up
‘theis regular residence in Germany-rartified Translation
Official Copy ~
AMTSGERICHT MUNCHEN
(District Court of Munich)
517 F 03277105
Transcript
Of the closed hearing held on July 19, 2005 in the District Court of Munich, Germany.
Present in person:
Dr. Schulz
District Court Judge
Ms, Strasser, Court Employee
Clerk of the Court
In the matter of
Gregory Gardner, 11872 South Lakes Court, Reston, Virginia 20191, USA.
~ Petitioner -
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Attorney Werner Martens
Ohmstr. 7, 80802 Munich, Germany
Stefanie Gardner, KistlerhofstraBe 181, 81379 Munich, Germany
~ Respondent -
Counsel for the Respondent:
Attomey Dr. Wolfgang Hering,
Lipowskystr. 12, 81373 Munich, Germany
Ref. no: 31/05CO1sw
Regarding the surrendering of children.
Parties present for the hearing:
Gregory Gardner, Petitioner
Counsel for the Petitioner, Attorney Werner Martens
Stefanie Gardner, Respondent
Counsel for the Respondent, Attomey Dr. Wolfgang Hering
German-English interpreter: Ms. Stiegler Irmela
yawns
‘The interpreter declares that she is sworn in517 F 0327/05
‘The Judge orders, adjudges, and decrees the following:
‘The Respondent shall be granted legal aid, and Attorney Dr. Hering shall be appointed to
represent the Respondent.
‘The Petitioner declares: Under no circumstances do I wish to accuse my wife of having
falsified the “Einwilligungserklarung” (“Statement of Consent”). I have signed so many
documents that I no longer have specific recollection of signing this statement too.
‘The domestic relations judge points out that there are no grounds to assume that the children
would be abducted unlawfully pursuant to §3 of HKU (Hague Convention on Child
Abduction), since the father has given his consent twice in writing that the children can reside
permanently in Germany,
The domestic relations judge suggests that the petition for surrendering the children be
withdrawn, and that during today’s hearing the parties should come to an agreement on the
rights of visitation.
‘The Respondent declares that she naturally agrees that the father should be able to visit both
children as often as is feasible for him to do so, provided she is given adequate assurance that
she will not be subject to any criminal proceedings in the US. Under the certainty that the
children will not be taken away from her, she is willing to fly with them to the US once a year
to enable the father to see his children.
‘The precondition of this consent on her part is that the father accepts that she has sole legal
custody, withdraws his petition filed in the Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations
District Court, and registers the judgment of the German court on legal custody at a court of
competent jurisdiction in the US.
‘The counsel for the Petitioner adds that Mr. Gardner is in agreement with these proposals.
Mr. Gardner guarantees that there are no pending criminal proceedings in the US against
Mrs. Gardner, and additionally assures that he will not file any charges against Mrs. Gardner
for wrongful removal of children in the US. Mr. Gardner is aware that through such actions he
would ruin the chances of future contact with his children for a long time.
Attorney Martens further declares that, at the moment, he is unable to provide any guaranty as
to whether it is possible to register the German child custody order in a US court.
‘The Petitioner declares for the court record that he will withdraw his claim for child custody
filed in the Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court. As to the grounds
for such withdrawal, he will declare that the children’s mother has been awarded sole legal
custody in Germany with his consent, that he accepts this decision without reservation, and
that in future he will maintain contact with his children pursuant to the terms of the agreement
‘on the rights of visitation. The Petitioner declares further that when the mother is in the US
with the children, he will not fi jim whatsoever in a US court to amend the decree on
the legal custody of the children.517 F 0327/05 : Certified Translation
Having been instructed on the relevant factual and legal issues, the parties hereto agree to the
following
Rights of Visitation
1. Mr. Gardner concedes that sole legal custody of the parties’ children, Alec Emmanuel
bom on September 19, 2001 and Dominic Vincent born on May 7, 2003 shall be granted
to the mother, Mrs. Stefanie Gardner.
| 2. Under the proviso that she shall not be subject to any criminal proceedings for wrongful
removal of children in the US, and under the certainty that the children will not be taken
away from her, Mrs. Gardner is willing to fly with the children to Virginia/USA once a
year to enable the father to see them.
‘The father shall, nevertheless, bear the travel expenses incurred for such a visit
3. Mrs. Gardner also agrees that the father may visit the children, Dominic and Alex, in
Germany as often as he can, depending on his financial and time constraints, with all such
visitations to be agreed upon between the parties.
4, Mrs. Gardner declares that she has no fundamental objection to the father phoning the
children, but until now it has been difficult to get the children to come to the phone,
because they are still very young.
Mrs. Gardner also gives further assurance that she will send pictures of and paintings done
by the children to the father.
5. The parents anticipate the next visit to take place at the end of September/early October in
Munich, and shall discuss the details between themselves.
Similarly, all subsequent visits shall be agreed upon between the parents, whereby the
mother again reiterates that the father may visit the children in Munich as often as he
desires.
This record is read out loud and approved by the parties.
Counsel for the Petitioner declares that he hereby withdraws the petition to surrender the
children.
‘The Judge orders, adjudges, and decrees as follows
1. The sum in dispute shall be set at EUR 5,000 (Euros Five thousand).
2. The parties shall split the costs of the legal proceedings.
3. The legal aid granted to the Respondent shall include the costs of negotiating this
agreement.
Dr. Schulz Ms. Strasser, Court Employee
District Court Judge Clerk of the Court
‘This is to certify that this official copy is a true and correct copy ofthe original
Dated: Munich, July 19, 2005
{Signature}
Ms. StraBer, Court Employee
Clerk of the CourtIn my capacity as a translator of the English language publicly appointed
and sworn in in the German Land of Bavaria, I hereby confirm that the
above translation is a true and correct translation of the document presented
to me in the original/as-a-photocopy/as-afax-copy
Als in Bayern 6ffentlich bestellte und allgemein beeidigte Ubersetzerin fir
die englische Sprache bestatige ich:
..Vorstehende Ubersetzung des mir im Original/in Potokepie/als Faxkepic
vorgelegten, in deutscher Sprache abgefassten Schriftstiicks ist richtig und
vollstindig.*
4.07.
Miinchen/Munich, 2005
Antoinette Aichele
Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford
December Term, 1856.
A RNEL L. AGUSTIN, Petitioner, Hon. Court of Appeals and Minor Martin Jose Prollamante, Represented by His Mother/Guardian Fe ANGELA PROLLAMANTE, Respondents
Christopher A. Burger, Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellee, 785 F.2d 890, 11th Cir. (1986)