TRAINING AND

DEVELOPMENT PROBLEM

Group 7
1) Anirudh
2) Deep mallika
3) Hema
4) Latha
5) Neetu
FACTS SURROUNDING THE CASE
 Junior level vacancies are filled up by
trainees who undergo training.
 Company provides training for one
year in different functional areas.
 Mr. Sudesh Saxena joined the
company in the year 2002 was taken
as trainee.
CONTD…
 At the end of second quarter the training
manager appreciated Mr. Saxena.
 Mr. Saxena requested training manager
that his training period has to be curtailed
and should be observed as an engineer.
 Request turned down as good performance
will be rewarded after completion of
training.
CONTD…
 Became erratic and unacceptable.
 After some time his monthly report
was not that good.
 Disobeyed any instruction given to
him.
OPTIONS OTHER THAN
TERMINATION
 Increase the pay according to
employees performance.
 Reward/ recognition.
 Update training policy.
 Early warnings should have been
given than counseling.
CONTD…
 Consequences of non performance
should be informed.
 More concentration on why the
performance went down and take an
effort to improve that.
WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG??
 Training period to be cut short.
 Counseling was done not to motivate
the employee.
 There was no reward/ recognition
given during training period.
 Trainer dint emphasis on why his
performance went low.
CONTD…
 Counseling was not given at the right
time so he felt offended.
 Should be removed with prior notice.
WAS TRAINEE HANDLED
PROPERLY??
 No the trainee was not handled
properly.
 The organization was concerned only
about its development but no
importance was given to its
employees satisfaction.
 He felt offended
HOW Mr. SHARMA COULD BE PUT
INTO RIGHT TRACK??
 Counseling should have been at the
right time to motivate, which was not
done so.
 A proper track on trainees should be
kept on daily basis.
 Reward/ recognition to be given.
 Management should have given
importance to employee grievence.