You are on page 1of 37

Operational Excellence

Six Sigma

Six Sigma: DMAIC; Y=f(x)


Is it a Goal, a Measure, a Process, a Tool or an expletive deleted?
By Lee Olson Presentation to INFORMS

D efine Measure Analyze Improve Control

Objectives

Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

Understand the Basics of the Six Sigma Program Understand How Six Sigma Relates to Lean, TOC, TQM (Theory Of Constraints; Total Quality Management) Ability to Define a Strategy and Roadmap for Success

Operational Excellence Training

Define

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Is it a Goal, a Measure, a Process, a Tool or an expletive deleted?

Yes

Operational Excellence Training

Define
Six Sigma Is a management methodology
Customer focused Data driven decisions Breakthrough performance gains Validated bottom line results

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Operational Excellence Training

Customer Focused
ON TIME DELIVERY (sample)

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

The percentage of sales order line items that ship complete on or before the original customer promise date, for all line items shipped in the month.

Our Performance Compared to Competitors

On-Time Delivery
100% 90% 80% 70% 60%

Pareto of Drivers
100% % Impact 75% 50% 25% 0%
xyz Cell Always Late Orders on Credit Hold
Target

Importance to Customers

20% 10%

Quality

OTD High

0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Reason

Top 5 Action Items


Driver Action Description Status Status Description Ow ner Original Due Date Current Due Date

Late Supplier Deliveries

Monthly reporting to suppliers on delivery & quality metrics.

On track

Report Cards Implemented.

Adam

5/21

Engineering Change Orders 5/21 6/15 6/15 7/15 9/15 5/21 5/21 6/15 8/15

Unrealistic Promise Date

Late Supplier Deliveries

Arrange face to face meetings with top offenders. Review and approve supplier's corrective action plan. Kaizen Event to focus on improving throughput by 40% and improve labor efficiency by 35% Focus on custom products to provide realistic ATP based on inventory and leadtime of components.

On track

Meetings Complete with top 10 Suppliers.

Beth

Late Supplier Deliveries

Caution Corrective Action Plan in Place for 2 major Suppliers On track

Carlos

xyz Cell Always Late

Event held 5/1. 25% throughput Doreen improvement in May. Labor Efficiency Increase of 30% Earnest

Unrealistic Promise Date

Problem Continued lack of progress. Restructured and focused team. Developing detailed plan.

Training Shared Goals Price Complaints Moderateto-Low

Were Better

Theyre Better

Operational Excellence Training

Low Yield on part abc

Late Supplier Deliveries

Complete

50% 40% 30%

Data Driven Decisions

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Y= f (X)
To get results, should we focus our behavior on the Y or X ?

Y Dependent Output Effect Symptom Monitor Response

X1 . . . XN Independent Input-Process Cause Problem Control Factor

Why should we test or inspect Y, if we know this relationship? Operational Excellence Training

Breakthrough performance gains


(Distribution Shifted 1.5 )

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6
Process Process Capability Capability

PPM PPM 30,53 08 37 38,57 66 07 6,87 6,80 6,20 ,21 6 10 23 33 23 3.4 .4 3


Defects per Million Defects per Million Opportunities Opportunities

Sigma is a statistical unit of measure which reflects process capability. The sigma scale of measure is perfectly correlated to such characteristics as defects-per-unit, parts-per million defective, and the probability of a failure/error.
Operational Excellence Training

L m tt o B not ca p m o I P
ri c e In cr ea se Vo lu m e In c. w ith Le ve r ag e lC os ts ia at er M

M an uf ac tu rin g SG &A Le ve ra g e Ta

Vo lu m e In c. No

Operational Excellence Training


G en

Assuming a 10% change in the factor

Validated bottom line results

Factors
W er al -5 % La or ki n Pr ic e g Ca p Re d

xe

s bo r

ita uc tio

n
Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

Define
Methodology Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Operational Excellence Training

Roadmap
Next Project Celebrate Project $

Example

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Define
Customers, Value, Problem Statement Scope, Timeline, Team Primary/Secondary & OpEx Metrics Current Value Stream Map Voice Of Customer (QFD)

Validate Project $

Measure
Assess specification / Demand Measurement Capability (Gage R&R) Correct the measurement system Process map, Spaghetti, Time obs. Measure OVs & IVs / Queues

Control
Document process (WIs, Std Work) Mistake proof, TT sheet, CI List Analyze change in metrics Value Stream Review Prepare final report

Validate Project $ Validate Project $

Improve
Optimize KPOVs & test the KPIVs Redesign process, set pacemaker 5S, Cell design, MRS Visual controls Value Stream Plan

Analyze (and fix the obvious)


Root Cause (Pareto, C&E, brainstorm)

Validate Project $

Find all KPOVs & KPIVs FMEA, DOE, critical Xs, VA/NVA Graphical Analysis, ANOVA Future Value Stream Map

Operational Excellence Training

Plan

Execute

Identify Problem

Operational Excellence Methodology

Strategic Link to Business Plan defined in Project Selection Process Defined Business Impact with Op Ex Champion support Structured Brainstorming at all organizational levels Cause and Effect Diagrams identifying critical factors Primary and Secondary Metrics defined and charted Multi-Level Pareto Charts to confirm project focus Develop a focused Problem Statement and Objective Develop a Process Map and/or FMEA Develop a Current State Map Identify the response variable(s) and how to measure them Analyze measurement system capability Assess the specification (Is one in place? Is it the right one?)

Practical Problem

Problem Definition

Characterize the response, look at the raw data Abnormal? Other Clues? Mean or Variance problem? Time Observation Spaghetti Diagram Takt Time Future State Maps Percent Loading Standard Work Combination Use Graphical Analysis, Multi-Vari, ANOVA and basic statistical tools to identify the likely families of variability Identify the likely Xs 5S Set Up Time Reduction (SMED) Material Replenishment Systems Level Loading / Line Leveling Cell Design Visual Controls Use Design of Experiments to find the critical few Xs Move the distribution; Shrink the spread; Confirm the results

Problem Solution

Problem Control
Plan

Execute

Mistake Proof the process (PokaYoke) Tolerance the process Measure the final capability Place appropriate process controls on the critical Xs Document the effort and results Standard Work TPM

Problem What do you want to know? Solvingwant to see what it is that you need How do you
to know?

What type of tool will generate what it is that you


need to see?

What type of data is required of the selected tool? Where can you get the required type of data?

Based in part on Six Sigma Methodology developed by GE Medical Systems and Six Sigma Academy, Inc. Co. Op. Ex. Methodology Originated by MBBs; D. Braasch, J. Davis, R. Duggins, J. OCallaghan, R. Crane

Key Items

Define

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Customers, Value, Problem Statement Scope, Timeline, Team Primary/Secondary & OpEx Metrics Current Value Stream Map Voice Of Customer (QFD) (Quality Function Deployment)

Operational Excellence Training

Project Selection
Impact

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Business Impact
Revenue Growth Cost Reduction Capital Reduction Key Business Objectives On Time Delivery Lead Time Quality Customer Satisfaction

Impact on Operational Excellence Metrics

Operational Excellence Training

Evaluate and Rank Suggestions


Effort and Risk

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Effort required
People Resources Capital Resources Duration of Project

Probability of success
Technical Risk
Data available Knowledge of process

Management Risk
Aligned with objectives Support by value stream manager

Impact vs. Risk vs. Effort


Assess ROI (Return On Investment) Assign priorities to projects
Operational Excellence Training

Evaluate and Rank Suggestions

Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

Example tool to rank projects 0106-01 Project Rating.xls


Operational Excellence Training

Project Ranking
5 4 3 2 1 0 1
3 7 8 9

Risk = Ball Size

Project Number

Impact

4 1

Effort

Example chart to rank projects 0106-01 Project Rating.xls

Measure

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Establish measurement capability


Validate the database (transactional) Gage R&R (Repeatability & Reproducibility) Calibration is not enough Many (or most) measurement systems are not capable How good is the data you are using to make decisions?

Fix the measurement system


Enables calculation of process capability Enables calculation of alpha & beta risks This step is often skipped

Operational Excellence Training

(and fix the obvious)

Analyze

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Find all KPOVs & KPIVs (Key Process Output Variables; Key Process Input Variables) FMEA, DOE, critical Xs, VA/NVA (Failure Modes Effects Analysis; Design Of Experiment) Graphical Analysis, ANOVA (Analysis Of Variance) Future Value Stream Map

Operational Excellence Training

Improve

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Optimize KPOVs & test the KPIVs (Key Process Output Variables; Key Process Input Variables) Redesign process, set pacemaker 5S, Cell design, MRS (Material Replenishment System) Visual controls Value Stream Plan

Operational Excellence Training

Control

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Management of Change
Owned by project champion and value stream manager Critical to long term success of project Physical and cultural changes

Measurement controls
On-going metrics

Visual Controls
Enable workers to self-manage the process

Operational Excellence Training

Basic Implementation

Roadmap

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Identify Customer Requirements

Understand and Define Entire Value Streams Vision (Strategic Business Plan) Deploy Key Business Objectives
- Measure and target (metrics)

- Align and involve all employees - Develop and motivate

Continuous Improvement (DMAIC) Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve


Identify root causes, prioritize, eliminate waste, make things flow and pulled by customers

Control
-Sustain Improvement -Drive Towards Perfection

Operational Excellence Training

3.0 3.1 3.2 2.0 2.1 2.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Improve the Metrics Educate/Get Everyone Involved

Improve Customer Focus

Your Manager's 1-Year Breakthrough Objectives


Train functional leaders as LGBs Improve On Time Delivery to 98% Establish tracking of OTD in every cell

Conduct interviews with top 10 customers

Train leadership team as Lean Green Belts (LGB)

Train worke inh o r p u s are u d b o r m cu o ers rs ow u rod ct se y u ajor st m

Your Annual Breakthrough

Indicator's and Goals


Complete 1 Leadership LGB training course

Objectives

Benefits
100% Completion of LGB Projects Leaders have ability to map a value stream
Metrics module in all appropriate training sequences Training projects demonstrate flowdown of metics to operational level

Operational Excellence Training


Develop culture of teams
Trainees participate in customer survey
Type in

Key:

Complete 3 functional LGB training courses Bring reps from top 10 customers in for plant tours Implement lean concepts in top 3 volume lines establish pareto of drivers for OTD

--> 4

Impact

IT Operations Quality Engineering Maintenance Marketing Training

Hoshin
q Owner
l

r q r q r r r r q r q r r q r r r r r r q

Resource

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

r Support
m

ON TIME DELIVERY (sample)


The percentage of sales order line items that ship complete on or before the original customer promise date, for all line items shipped in the month.

On-Time Delivery
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40%

Pareto of Drivers
100% % Impact 75% 50% 25% 0%
Target

20% 10% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Reason

Top 5 Action Items


Driver Action Description Status Status Description Ow ner Original Due Date Current Due Date

Late Supplier Deliveries

Monthly reporting to suppliers on delivery & quality metrics.

On track

Report Cards Implemented.

Adam

5/21

Engineering Change Orders 5/21 6/15 6/15 7/15 9/15 5/21 5/21 6/15 8/15

Orders on Credit Hold

Late Supplier Deliveries

xyz Cell Always Late

Unrealistic Promise Date

Late Supplier Deliveries

Arrange face to face meetings with top offenders. Review and approve supplier's corrective action plan. Kaizen Event to focus on improving throughput by 40% and improve labor efficiency by 35% Focus on custom products to provide realistic ATP based on inventory and leadtime of components.

On track

Meetings Complete with top 10 Suppliers.

Beth

Late Supplier Deliveries

Caution Corrective Action Plan in Place for 2 major Suppliers On track Event held 5/1. 25% throughput improvement in May. Labor Efficiency Increase of 30%

Carlos

xyz Cell Always Late

Doreen

Unrealistic Promise Date

Problem Continued lack of progress. Restructured and focused team. Developing detailed plan.

Earnest

Low Yield on part abc

30%

Does it work?.

Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

The top companies in Customer Satisfaction grow MVA at nearly twice the rate of their poor-performing counterparts.

Market Value Added

50 40 30 20 10 0

In Billions $

$42 $23

1999 73 companies Ralston Purina Quaker Oats Hilton Hotels Coca-Cola Unilever etc.

Low

High

Customer Satisfaction Index Score


Source: American Customer Satisfaction Index, U Michigan, HBR, 2001

Operational Excellence Training

What about Lean, TOC, TQM


Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

Six Sigma
Remove defects, minimize variance

Lean
Remove waste, shorten the flow

TOC
Remove and manage constraints

TQM
Continuous Improvement

Operational Excellence Training

Value Stream Map - Current State


6 WEEK Forecast
Suppliers

Production Control

90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days

Customer

y ekl We ax F

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

Demand = 45/day Takt Time = 18.2 min Competitive LT = 3 days


Suppliers

On-Time Delivery
Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer

Customer Data

6 WEEK Forecast

y ekl We ax F

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

Raw = 5 days WIP = 12.1 days FG = 6.5 days


Suppliers

Inventory
6 WEEK Forecast Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer

y ekl We ax F

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

Lead Time = 23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min


y ekl We ax F

Flow of Value
Lead Time
Customer Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days

6 WEEK Forecast

Suppliers

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

Max Wip = 7.6 days CT (67) > Takt Time (18)


6 WEEK Forecast
y ekl We ax F

OTD, Lead Time


Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer

Constraints

Suppliers

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

CO = 1 hour CO = 23 min CO =
Suppliers

OP Margin, Lead Time


Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer

Setup Times

6 WEEK Forecast Changeover


y ekl We ax F

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

Uptime = 70%
6 WEEK Forecast
Suppliers

OTD, Lead Time


Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer

Maintenance

y ekl We ax F

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

FTY = 67%
6 WEEK Forecast
Suppliers

Quality
Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer

y ekl We ax F

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

Who is setting the pace? What is the pitch time?


6 WEEK Forecast
Suppliers

OTD, Lead Time


Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer

Flow of Value

y ekl We ax F

MRP

Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days

Lead Time - 34 Days WEEKLY SCHEDULE

1X Daily I

Coils 5 days

Stamping

S. Weld # 1

342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min

Assembly I

Test

Shipping I I

81 CT= 15 min Co=0 min. Uptime=100% 2 shifts 1.8 days 15 min

122 CT= 67 min Co= 23 min FTY = 67% 2 shifts

202

90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min

5 days

2.7 days 67 min

4.5 days

Making it happen
Three major roles Implementer

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Learns the tools Works the process Solves day to day problems Learns the methodology Manages a value stream Reviews project teams Establishes the vision for the future Sets priorities Encourages

Manager

Where do you need to focus?

Leader

Operational Excellence Training

What Is a Sigma?

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

A metric that indicates how well a process is performing.


Higher is better Measures the capability of the process to perform defect-free work Also known as z, it is based on standard deviation for continuous data For discrete data it is calculated from DPMO

Operational Excellence Training

The Normal Curve and Capability

efine D Measure Analyze Improve Control

Units of Measure

Area of Yield

Performance Limit

Probability of a Defect
Units of Measure

Units of Measure

P o Poe o r r c ss Cp b a a ility
V ryH h e ig P bb ro a ility o D fe ts f e c V ryH h e ig P bb ro a ility o D fe ts f e c V ryL w e o P bb ro a ility o D fe ts f e c

E c lle t xe n Po e r c ss Cp b a a ility
V ryL w e o P bb ro a ility o D fe ts f e c

LL S

UL S

LL S

UL S

Low Sigma Low Sigma Operational Excellence Training

High Sigma High Sigma

You might also like