Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Six Sigma: DMAIC Y F (X)
Six Sigma: DMAIC Y F (X)
Six Sigma
Objectives
Understand the Basics of the Six Sigma Program Understand How Six Sigma Relates to Lean, TOC, TQM (Theory Of Constraints; Total Quality Management) Ability to Define a Strategy and Roadmap for Success
Define
Yes
Define
Six Sigma Is a management methodology
Customer focused Data driven decisions Breakthrough performance gains Validated bottom line results
Customer Focused
ON TIME DELIVERY (sample)
The percentage of sales order line items that ship complete on or before the original customer promise date, for all line items shipped in the month.
On-Time Delivery
100% 90% 80% 70% 60%
Pareto of Drivers
100% % Impact 75% 50% 25% 0%
xyz Cell Always Late Orders on Credit Hold
Target
Importance to Customers
20% 10%
Quality
OTD High
0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Reason
On track
Adam
5/21
Engineering Change Orders 5/21 6/15 6/15 7/15 9/15 5/21 5/21 6/15 8/15
Arrange face to face meetings with top offenders. Review and approve supplier's corrective action plan. Kaizen Event to focus on improving throughput by 40% and improve labor efficiency by 35% Focus on custom products to provide realistic ATP based on inventory and leadtime of components.
On track
Beth
Carlos
Event held 5/1. 25% throughput Doreen improvement in May. Labor Efficiency Increase of 30% Earnest
Problem Continued lack of progress. Restructured and focused team. Developing detailed plan.
Were Better
Theyre Better
Complete
Y= f (X)
To get results, should we focus our behavior on the Y or X ?
Why should we test or inspect Y, if we know this relationship? Operational Excellence Training
2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6
Process Process Capability Capability
Sigma is a statistical unit of measure which reflects process capability. The sigma scale of measure is perfectly correlated to such characteristics as defects-per-unit, parts-per million defective, and the probability of a failure/error.
Operational Excellence Training
L m tt o B not ca p m o I P
ri c e In cr ea se Vo lu m e In c. w ith Le ve r ag e lC os ts ia at er M
M an uf ac tu rin g SG &A Le ve ra g e Ta
Vo lu m e In c. No
Factors
W er al -5 % La or ki n Pr ic e g Ca p Re d
xe
s bo r
ita uc tio
n
Define Measure Analyze Improve Control
Define
Methodology Define Measure Analyze Improve Control
Roadmap
Next Project Celebrate Project $
Example
Define
Customers, Value, Problem Statement Scope, Timeline, Team Primary/Secondary & OpEx Metrics Current Value Stream Map Voice Of Customer (QFD)
Validate Project $
Measure
Assess specification / Demand Measurement Capability (Gage R&R) Correct the measurement system Process map, Spaghetti, Time obs. Measure OVs & IVs / Queues
Control
Document process (WIs, Std Work) Mistake proof, TT sheet, CI List Analyze change in metrics Value Stream Review Prepare final report
Improve
Optimize KPOVs & test the KPIVs Redesign process, set pacemaker 5S, Cell design, MRS Visual controls Value Stream Plan
Validate Project $
Find all KPOVs & KPIVs FMEA, DOE, critical Xs, VA/NVA Graphical Analysis, ANOVA Future Value Stream Map
Plan
Execute
Identify Problem
Strategic Link to Business Plan defined in Project Selection Process Defined Business Impact with Op Ex Champion support Structured Brainstorming at all organizational levels Cause and Effect Diagrams identifying critical factors Primary and Secondary Metrics defined and charted Multi-Level Pareto Charts to confirm project focus Develop a focused Problem Statement and Objective Develop a Process Map and/or FMEA Develop a Current State Map Identify the response variable(s) and how to measure them Analyze measurement system capability Assess the specification (Is one in place? Is it the right one?)
Practical Problem
Problem Definition
Characterize the response, look at the raw data Abnormal? Other Clues? Mean or Variance problem? Time Observation Spaghetti Diagram Takt Time Future State Maps Percent Loading Standard Work Combination Use Graphical Analysis, Multi-Vari, ANOVA and basic statistical tools to identify the likely families of variability Identify the likely Xs 5S Set Up Time Reduction (SMED) Material Replenishment Systems Level Loading / Line Leveling Cell Design Visual Controls Use Design of Experiments to find the critical few Xs Move the distribution; Shrink the spread; Confirm the results
Problem Solution
Problem Control
Plan
Execute
Mistake Proof the process (PokaYoke) Tolerance the process Measure the final capability Place appropriate process controls on the critical Xs Document the effort and results Standard Work TPM
Problem What do you want to know? Solvingwant to see what it is that you need How do you
to know?
What type of data is required of the selected tool? Where can you get the required type of data?
Based in part on Six Sigma Methodology developed by GE Medical Systems and Six Sigma Academy, Inc. Co. Op. Ex. Methodology Originated by MBBs; D. Braasch, J. Davis, R. Duggins, J. OCallaghan, R. Crane
Key Items
Define
Customers, Value, Problem Statement Scope, Timeline, Team Primary/Secondary & OpEx Metrics Current Value Stream Map Voice Of Customer (QFD) (Quality Function Deployment)
Project Selection
Impact
Business Impact
Revenue Growth Cost Reduction Capital Reduction Key Business Objectives On Time Delivery Lead Time Quality Customer Satisfaction
Effort required
People Resources Capital Resources Duration of Project
Probability of success
Technical Risk
Data available Knowledge of process
Management Risk
Aligned with objectives Support by value stream manager
Project Ranking
5 4 3 2 1 0 1
3 7 8 9
Project Number
Impact
4 1
Effort
Measure
Analyze
Find all KPOVs & KPIVs (Key Process Output Variables; Key Process Input Variables) FMEA, DOE, critical Xs, VA/NVA (Failure Modes Effects Analysis; Design Of Experiment) Graphical Analysis, ANOVA (Analysis Of Variance) Future Value Stream Map
Improve
Optimize KPOVs & test the KPIVs (Key Process Output Variables; Key Process Input Variables) Redesign process, set pacemaker 5S, Cell design, MRS (Material Replenishment System) Visual controls Value Stream Plan
Control
Management of Change
Owned by project champion and value stream manager Critical to long term success of project Physical and cultural changes
Measurement controls
On-going metrics
Visual Controls
Enable workers to self-manage the process
Basic Implementation
Roadmap
Understand and Define Entire Value Streams Vision (Strategic Business Plan) Deploy Key Business Objectives
- Measure and target (metrics)
Control
-Sustain Improvement -Drive Towards Perfection
3.0 3.1 3.2 2.0 2.1 2.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Improve the Metrics Educate/Get Everyone Involved
Objectives
Benefits
100% Completion of LGB Projects Leaders have ability to map a value stream
Metrics module in all appropriate training sequences Training projects demonstrate flowdown of metics to operational level
Key:
Complete 3 functional LGB training courses Bring reps from top 10 customers in for plant tours Implement lean concepts in top 3 volume lines establish pareto of drivers for OTD
--> 4
Impact
Hoshin
q Owner
l
r q r q r r r r q r q r r q r r r r r r q
Resource
r Support
m
On-Time Delivery
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40%
Pareto of Drivers
100% % Impact 75% 50% 25% 0%
Target
20% 10% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Reason
On track
Adam
5/21
Engineering Change Orders 5/21 6/15 6/15 7/15 9/15 5/21 5/21 6/15 8/15
Arrange face to face meetings with top offenders. Review and approve supplier's corrective action plan. Kaizen Event to focus on improving throughput by 40% and improve labor efficiency by 35% Focus on custom products to provide realistic ATP based on inventory and leadtime of components.
On track
Beth
Caution Corrective Action Plan in Place for 2 major Suppliers On track Event held 5/1. 25% throughput improvement in May. Labor Efficiency Increase of 30%
Carlos
Doreen
Problem Continued lack of progress. Restructured and focused team. Developing detailed plan.
Earnest
30%
Does it work?.
The top companies in Customer Satisfaction grow MVA at nearly twice the rate of their poor-performing counterparts.
50 40 30 20 10 0
In Billions $
$42 $23
1999 73 companies Ralston Purina Quaker Oats Hilton Hotels Coca-Cola Unilever etc.
Low
High
Six Sigma
Remove defects, minimize variance
Lean
Remove waste, shorten the flow
TOC
Remove and manage constraints
TQM
Continuous Improvement
Production Control
Customer
y ekl We ax F
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
On-Time Delivery
Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer
Customer Data
6 WEEK Forecast
y ekl We ax F
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
Inventory
6 WEEK Forecast Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer
y ekl We ax F
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
Flow of Value
Lead Time
Customer Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days
6 WEEK Forecast
Suppliers
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
Constraints
Suppliers
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
CO = 1 hour CO = 23 min CO =
Suppliers
Setup Times
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
Uptime = 70%
6 WEEK Forecast
Suppliers
Maintenance
y ekl We ax F
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
FTY = 67%
6 WEEK Forecast
Suppliers
Quality
Production Control 90/60/30 day Forecasts Order Entry Orders/day = 36 Queue = 1.5 Days Customer
y ekl We ax F
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
Flow of Value
y ekl We ax F
MRP
Demand = 45 per day 2 shifts Takt Time = 18.2 Minutes Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
1X Daily I
Coils 5 days
Stamping
S. Weld # 1
342 CT=1sec Co=1 hr. Uptime=85% 1 shift CT=3 min Co=10 min. Uptime=70% 1 shift 7.6 days 1 sec 3 min
Assembly I
Test
Shipping I I
202
90 CT= 4 min Co=0 Uptime=100% 2 shifts Lead Time =23.6 days Touch Time = 89 min 2 days 4 min
5 days
4.5 days
Making it happen
Three major roles Implementer
Learns the tools Works the process Solves day to day problems Learns the methodology Manages a value stream Reviews project teams Establishes the vision for the future Sets priorities Encourages
Manager
Leader
What Is a Sigma?
Units of Measure
Area of Yield
Performance Limit
Probability of a Defect
Units of Measure
Units of Measure
P o Poe o r r c ss Cp b a a ility
V ryH h e ig P bb ro a ility o D fe ts f e c V ryH h e ig P bb ro a ility o D fe ts f e c V ryL w e o P bb ro a ility o D fe ts f e c
E c lle t xe n Po e r c ss Cp b a a ility
V ryL w e o P bb ro a ility o D fe ts f e c
LL S
UL S
LL S
UL S