Professional Documents
Culture Documents
mix of land pp innovation with
Support Reduce transportation,
p energy
gy and Foster an 18/7 neighborhood
g Connect mixed uses with
amplified housing and retail water demands by co‐locating by adding housing and retail walkable streets, diverse
use/activities workplaces, housing, retail gathering places
transportation
p Make Kendall more accessible Reduce energy use with a more Build community with Enable more local trips on foot
with improved access choices – balanced , less auto dependent people‐scaled by locating diverse activities
choices emphasizing walking, biking, mode share. Promote public health transportation: walking, near one another
transit through walking biking, transit
…creating a network of
diverse places building
community, it lit iinnovation
it vitality, ti
* * *
In the study area:
• Existing/pipeline:
Approx. 15 ac *
Nea tthee study
Near study area
a ea in this
t s *
diagram:
• Existing/pipeline:
Approx. 38 ac *
PUBLIC PLACES
* * *
In the study area:
• Existing/pipeline:
Approx. 15 ac *
• Potential:
ote t a : Approx.
pp o . 10+
0 ac *
• Total: Approx. 26 ac
Near the study area in this
diagram:
g *
• Existing/pipeline:
Approx. 38 ac
• Potential: Approx. 2 ac
• Total: Approx. 40 ac
PUBLIC PLACES
Potential
Courtyards
* *
• Intimate sense of scale
• Distinctive landscape
design and plantings
• Typical
yp ca activities:
act v t es:
– Sitting: alone, groups
– Childrens’ play
– Group events
• Primarily serve occupants
of adjacent building/block
• Within one block of anyy
housing
• Existing: approx. 6 ac.
One First Street • Potential: approx. 1 ac.
Gardens and Courtyards
Roof Gardens
Potential Roof
• Connected to adjacent Gardens
interior space
• Visible from above
• Overlooking
Ove oo g pub publicc space
below
• Distinctive landscape
design and plantings
• Typical activities:
– Sitting: alone, groups
– Group events
• Primarily serve occupants
of adjacent building/block • Existing: approx. 1 ac.
Cambridge Center • Potential: approx. 4 ac.
Roof Gardens
Parks
Enhanced Potential
Park Park
*
• Larger scale
scale, prominence
• Significant presence of
lawn/field and/or water *
• Typical
yp ca activities:
act v t es:
– Sitting: alone, groups
– Informal sports
– Childrens
Childrens’ play
*
– Dogs
– Community gardens
– Festivals,
Festivals concerts
• Serve the general public,
especially the immediate • Existing: approx. 6 ac.
neighborhood Broad Canal • Potential: approx. 4 ac.
Parks
Mix of lawn, trees, sun, shade (SF) Water elements (Copley Square)
P k t parks
Pocket k (Velluci, S )
(V ll i Inman Sq.) H t events
Host t
Seating and walking areas
• Existing: approx. 6 ac.
• Potential: approx. 4 ac.
Parks
PUBLIC PLACES
Plazas
Enhanced
plaza
• Larger scale
scale, prominence.
prominence
Mixed-use context.
• Significant pedestrian
hardscape, complementary
plantings; winter garden? *
• Typical activities:
* *
– Walking to destinations
including transit, bike
– Sitting: alone, groups
– Engaging public art/media
– Outdoor dining, retail
– Outdoor markets, buskers South Plaza
– Festivals, concerts Main/Ames • Existing: approx. 3 ac.
• Serve the general public. • Potential: approx. 2 ac.
Plazas
Distincti
(Rose Kennedy Greenway)
*
*
Winter Garden (Sheffield U.K.)
Destinations
P k t gathering
Pocket th i spaces
Convey history
history, future
Active sidewalks/interiors
* *
• Continuous network
linked to surrounding
corridors, neighborhoods
• Welcoming streetscapes,
ample space for walking,
walking
trees, dining/retail, art
• Typical activities:
*
– Walking
– Engaging in art/media
– Outdoor dining, retail
– Public interior
activities: dining,
dining
culture, education…
• Serve general public • Existing: over 350K+ sf
‘Za, Broad Canal Street • Potential: over 350K+ sf
Active sidewalks/interiors
Traffic separation
separation,
interior connection
(Seattle)
Main/Broadway
MIT Gateway
Gate a
MIT Core Broad Canal
Campus
Point Park
FRAMEWORK: Building form
Balancing complementary goals
through building form
• Enhance walkability with sun,
views and development intensity
• Locate greatest intensity in a
Locate
compact walkable area near
transit – to minimize traffic
impacts, maximize mixed-use
b
benefit
fi
• Consider shadow impacts on
open space and housing,
especially during shoulder
months
• Encourage housing production
• Mark Kendall Square’s
q core with
attractive, distinctive
architecture having a variety of
heights and massing
BUILDING FORM
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
• Leverage community and
innovation benefits of mixed-use
environment
• Focus intensity around transit
• Prevent development pressures on
traditional neighborhoods
• Support city and state economic
development
BUILDING FORM
TTallest
ll t andd IIntermediate
t di t hheight
ight bbands
d
(vary per context as appropriate) –
Required: smaller floorplates, reasonable
impacts (shadow,
(shadow view
view, sky
sky, traffic etc
etc.),
)
outstanding design.
Housing required in Tallest band (above 250’)
Streetwall height band
Shadows:
• Consider shadow
i
impacts on open space
and housing, especially
during shoulder
months
• North Plaza ice rink
winter sun corridor
Sky: Kendall building sky
corridor
Streetwall: up to 75’/85’
• 16’ step-back at datum height
• Main, Broadway, y Third, Volpe
p
park: 75’ datum
• Binney: 85’ datum
Tallest: 250’-300’ +
• Within 2 blocks or 800’ of Red
Line
• Space above 250’ must be
housing
• Floorplate limit: 6,500sf
Office/research
Retail/active
ground floor