You are on page 1of 4

Double page spread

Overall double page spread impact


7 6

5
4 3

2
1 0 Excellent Very good Good OK Poor

Choice of images and manipulation


7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Excellent Very good Good OK Poor

Choice of headlines
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Excellent Very good Good OK Poor

Appropriate use of language


7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Excellent Very good Good OK Poor

Appropriate use of image and text


7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Excellent Very good Good OK Poor

Appropriateness for target audience


7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Excellent Very good Good OK Poor

Professionalism/ how well does it compare to other magazines?

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Excellent Very good Good OK Poor

From the responses from my questionnaire, I have gathered that there are some improvements need to be made to my magazine to give it a more professional approach. I have looked at the results and have noticed that an improvement needed would be required in my Photoshop techniques. However, on the other hand, the majority of feedback was positive when saying my choice of sell lines was good. On the other hand, qualities such as my contents page were weak and would need improving if this task was to be repeated. The reason for this was the limited time available to create these pages in and having limited Photoshop skills, proved more difficult.

You might also like