PROJECT GUIDE : MR. P.

ANBARASAN

BY K RAJA NAREN (08BEE075) R SRI HARSHA (08BEE125)

RESTRUCTURED POWER SYSTEMS OPTIMAL POWER FLOW FOR ECONOMIC DISPATCH SOMETIMES THIS LEADS TO CONGESTION IN TRANSMISSION LINES THIS CREATES A LOT OF PROBLEMS LIKE HIGH POWER LOSSES , DIFFICULTY IN TRNSMITTING POWER

TO REDUCE CONGESTION WE HAVE TO RESCHEDULE THE GENERATION SCHEDULE WE LOOK AT SYSTEMS POOL DISPATCH BILATERAL DISPATCH NON-COST FREE METHODS RESCHEDULING CURTAILMENT OF LOAD COST FREE METHODS FACTS DEVICES, PHASE SHIFTERS

TO REDUCE CONGESTION IN RESTRUCTURED POWER SYSTEMS BY RESCHEDULING THE GENERATION SCHEDULE WITH NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS IN OPF PROBLEM FORMULATION

HUGE GROWTH IN LOAD DEMANDRESTRUCTURED POWER SYSTEMS CONGESTION-OPERATING CONDITION IN WHICH, NO ENOUGH TRANSMISSION CAPABILITY TO IMPLEMENT ALL THE TRADED TRANSACTIONS CONGESTION MANAGEMENT IDENTIFYING AND THEN RESCHEDULING THE GENERATION SCHEDULE

OPF PROBLEM IS FORMED AND SOLVED USING PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMISATION PSO IS MOTIVATED FROM BEHAVIOUR OF SOCIAL SYSTEMS INITIALLY A POPULATION IS FORMED RANDOMLY

MOVEMENT OF EACH PARTICLE DEPENDS ON BOTH ITS BEST AND GLOBAL BEST POSITION THIS ITERATIVE PROCESS CONTINUES TILL SPECIFIED NO OF ITERATIONS 3 AND 5 GENERATOR SYSTEMS WERE SOLVED FOR ECONOMIC DISPATCH WITH AND WITHOUT LOSSES USING PSO IN MATLAB 7.8

TYPE 3 GENERATOR WITHOUT CONSTRAINTS

PROBLEM C1=500+5.3P1+0.004P1^2 C2=400+5.5P2+0.006P2^2 C3=200+5.8P3+0.009P3^2 PD=800MW

ACTUAL ANS P1=400MW P2=250MW P3=150MW C=6,682.5$

OBTAINED ANS P1=400MW P2=250MW P3=150MW C=6,682.5$

3 GENERATOR WITH CONSTRAINTS

C1=500+5.3P1+0.004P1^2 200<P1<450
C2=400+5.5P2+0.006P2^2 150<P2<350 C3=200+5.8P3+0.009P3^2 100<P3<225 PD=975MW

P1=450 P2=325 P3=200 C=8,236.25$

P1=450 P2=325 P3=200 C=8,236.25$

6950

6900

6850
cost function

6800

6750

6700

6650

20

40

60

80 100 120 no of iterations

140

160

180

200

8360

8340

8320

cost function

8300

8280

8260

8240

8220

20

40

60

80 100 120 no of iterations

140

160

180

200

TYPE 3 GENERATOR WITH LOSSES

PROBLEM C1=200+7P1+0.008P1^2 10<P1<85 C2=180+6.3P2+0.009P2^2 10<P2<80 C3=140+6.8P3+0.007P3^2 10<P3<70 PL=0.0218P1^2+0.0228P2^ 2+0.0179P3^2 (BASE=150MW) PD=150MW

ACTUAL ANS P1=35.1 P2=64.13 P3=52.47 C=1592.65$

OBTAINED ANS P1=34.3 P2=62.65 P3=54.67 C=1592.3$

1602 1601 1600 1599

cost function

1598 1597 1596 1595 1594 1593 1592

20

40

60

80 100 120 no of iterations

140

160

180

200

TYPE 5 GENERATOR WITHOUT LOSSES

PROBLEM

ANSWER P1=30.8 P2=63.63 P3=63.53 P4=50.96 P5=50.99 C=1208.3$/hr

C1=40+3.6P1+0.005P1^2 20<P<120
C2=60+3.4P2+0.004P2^2

C3=60+3.4P3+0.004P3^2
C4=50+3.5P4+0.0045P4^2 C5=40+3.5P5+0.0045P5^2 PD=260

1235

1230

1225

cost function

1220

1215

1210

1205

50

100

150 no of iterations

200

250

300

AFTER HAVING GENERATION SCHEDULE , WE HAVE TO CHECK WHETHER CONGESTION ARISES OR NOT FOR THIS WE WILL DO LOAD FLOW ANALYSIS USING NEWTON RAPHSON METHOD OBTAINED RESULTS WILL BE USED TO FIND POWER TO BE TRANSMITTED

INITIALLY NET POWER AVAILABLE AT EACH BUS IS CALCULATED FOR EACH BRANCH, CURRENT ENTERING FROM BOTH ENDS IS CALCULATED FOR EACH BRANCH, POWER FLOW IS FOUND ( S=VI*) THIS VALUE IS COMPARED WITH THE LINE MVA RATING

B.NO. 1 2

GEN REAL 1.2959 0.4

GEN REACT -0.0742 0.3

LOAD REAL 0 0.2

LOAD REACT 0 0.1

VM 1.06 1.0474

DELTA 0 -2.8063

3
4 5

0
0 0

0
0 0

0.45
0.4 0.6

0.15
0.05 0.1

1.0242
1.0236 1.0179

-4.997
-5.3291 -6.1503

BRANCH 1-2 1-3 2-3 2-4 2-5 3-4 4-5

ACTUAL ANS 0.8886 0.4072 0.2469 0.2794 0.5482 0.1887 0.0633

OBTAINED ANS 0.888 0.40721 0.24709 0.27949 0.54859 0.18862 0.06343

STANDARD IEEE 3 GENERATOR 5 BUS SYSTEM WITH SPECIFIED GENERATION SCHEDULE IS CHECKED FOR CONGESTION IN MATLAB 7.8
LINE 1-2 1-3 MVA RATING 150 100 POWER TO BE TRANSMITTED 163.6 53.9

2-3
2-4 2-5 3-4 4-5

50
100 120 100 100

17.6
23.1 91.2 34.1 29.6

RESCHEDULE- BY INTRODUCING PENALTY FUNCTION IN PSO PENALTY FUNCTION CONVERTS CONSTRAINED PROBLEM INTO UNCONSTRAINED PROBLEM PENALTY FUNCTION IS VALUE PROPORTIONAL TO THE DEVIATION FROM CONSTRAINTS IT IS ADDED TO THE COST FUNCTION

OUR CASE-PROBLEM IS NOT COMPLETELY CONVERTED INTO UNCONSTRAINED ONLY CONGESTION IS CONSIDERED IN PENALTY FUNCTION AND ADDED TO COST FUNCTION EVERY TIME NEW POSITION IS CREATED, INTENSITY OF CONGESTION IS CALCULATED BY LOADFLOW AND LINEFLOW STUDIES AND ADDED TO COST FUNCTION

BUS NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5

LOAD MW 0 120 100 80 120

GEN MIN MW 0 100 50 -

GEN MAX MW 1000 400 300 -

VOLTAGE COST (RS/MWhr) 1.05 1.02 1.02 675 765 855 -

ED SOLUTION TOTAL GEN COST CONGESTION LINE LOSSES TOTAL LOSSES NET POWER DELIVERED EFFECTIVE COST (RS/MWhr) P1=270,P2=100,P3=50 RS.3,01,500/13.64MW(IN 1-2 LINE) 11.4MW 25MW 420-25=395MW 848

RESCHEDULING P1=254.1,P2=115.9,P3=50 RS.3,02,931/2.4MW(IN 1-2 LINE) 10.7MW 13.1MW 420-13=407MW 827

2.46

x 10

2.44

2.42

cost function

2.4

2.38

2.36

2.34

20

40

60

80 100 120 no of iterations

140

160

180

200

2.52 2.51 2.5 2.49

x 10

cost function

2.48 2.47 2.46 2.45 2.44 2.43

20

40

60

80 100 120 no of iterations

140

160

180

200

STANDARD IEEE 14 BUS SYSTEM 30<P1<100; 0.3P1^2+3.4P2+30 20<P2<100; 0.5P2^2+3.51P2+44.4 20<P3<100; 0.5P3^2+3.89P3+40.6 50<P4<200; 0.5P4^2+2.45P4+105 50<P5<200; 0.3P5^2+2.2P5+110 TOTAL LOAD=260MW

ECONOMIC DISPATCH RESCHEDULING SOLUTION P1=65.19;P2=38.95; P3=38.62;P4=50;P5=67.2 P1=52.42;P3=52.36 P3=52.1;P4=50;P5=53

TOTAL GEN COST CONGESTION

RS.2,92,257/7.3(1-2) 4.13(5-4) 3.8(5-6)

2.6MW 17.9 MW 260-17.9=242.1MW 1,207.17

RS.3,05,014.5/3.2 (5-6) MW

MW

LINE LOSSES TOTAL LOSSES NET POWER DELIVERED EFFECTIVE COST (RS/MWhr)

2 MW 5.2 MW 260-5.2=254.8MW 1,197

1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6

x 10

cost function

20

40

60

80 100 120 no of iterations

140

160

180

200

4.5

x 10

3.5

cost function

2.5

1.5

50

100

150 200 250 no of iterations

300

350

400

JANUARY: ECONOMIC DISPATCH FEBRUARY: LINEFLOW- IDENTIFYING CONGESTION MARCH: RESCHEDULING AND COMPARING THE OBTAINED RESULTS APRIL: MAKE CONCLUSIONS AND THESIS WORK

MAKE CONCLUSIONS FROM OBTAINED RESULTS REPORT AND THESIS WORK

M A Pai and A S Nayak University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign Masters thesis report and Project report Congestion management in restructured power systems using an Optimal power flow Frame work. D.N. Jeyakumar , T. Jayabarathi , T. Raghunathan ,Particle swarm optimization for various types of economic dispatch problems Electrical Power and Energy Systems 28 (2006) 3642 Congestion management in hybrid power markets, Yu Xiao , Peng Wang, L.Goel Vestas Technology R&D Singapore pte Ltd , Connexis, 1 Fusionopolis Way, #06-10, Singapore 138632, Singapore bschool of EEE, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, singapore Congestion Management Using Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization, Jagabondhu Hazra and Avinash K. Sinha IEEE

Transactions on power systems, vol. 22, no. 4, November 2007

D. Shirmohammadi et al., Transmission dispatch and congestion management in the emerging energy market structures, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1466-1474, November 1998. Congestion management using adaptive bacterial foraging algorithm B.K.panigrahi, V.Ravikumar Pandi Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Congestion management in competetive power market: a bibilographical survey, Electrical power system research 2005;76:153-64 Kumara A Srivastava SC, Singh S.N.