Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NGN Basics
NGN Basics
A Next Generation Network (NGN) is a packet-based network able to provide Telecommunication Services and able to make use of multiple broadband, QoS-enabled transport technologies and in which service-related functions are independent from underlying transport-related technologies. It enables unfettered access for users and networks to competing service providers and/or services of their choice. It supports generalized mobility which will allow consistent and ubiquitous provision of services to users
Generalized Mobility Unfettered Access Separation Services with Transport QoS-enabled Transport Multiple-Broadband
Convergence btw. Fixed & Mobile Any Device Scenario Architecture and Open API Manageable Broadband
Packet-based network Voice, Data Multimedia Services Separation of service, control, media and access
NGN
Multi-vendor interoperability
Open interfaces
Services
Transport
Access
Service Layer
Service A
Service B
Open interfaces
Control Layer
SIP
Management
Databases
Separated control
NB Wireless
H.248
QoS Mechanism
BB Wireless
Usage Measurement
Access Layer
FMC
Transport Layer
5
Operator 1
Operator 2
>
AS Operator 1 Operator 2
AS
Two-Party model: communication applications hosted by end-users > QoS at transport level ensured following explicit user requests > Interconnection agreements limited to transport: universal reach per application ensured by proper naming and Server Interconnection > Charging related to amount of transported data
>
>
Provide the essential revenue stream to network operators Ensure end users capability of using new applications and services
Brokered by the network operator with QoS guarantee or... Accessed by end user as in Internet mode without service guarantee
Wireless
Internet Mobile
Fixed Network
Broadcasting
Others Cable TV
ICT
Voice Services
Data Services
Video Services
25
14
MSCVLR
A1/A2/A5 MAP BTS BSC/PCF
G-MSC PSTN/ISDN
PSTN/ISDN
MAP
SCP
A10/A11
HLR
SMS SC
other PLMN
PDSN
IP backbone Network
HA
Pi
Internet Intranet
AAA
Packet Switched (PS) domain Radio Access Network Core Network Interworked Network
SCPe
MAP BTS BSC A1
HLRe
MAP
MSCe
A2
SIP-T
Legacy BSS
A1 p
MGW
IP transport
MGW
PSTN/ISDN
ALL-IP BSS
PDSN
IP backbone Network
HA
Pi
Internet Intranet
AAA
Access Network
Interworked Network
IP Multimedia Domain
Application Server HSS BGCF
Diameter SIP BTS BSC PCF SIP
MGCF
H.248
A
ALL-IP RAN
Access Network
Core Network
Interworking Network
Returns
Traffic Customers O&M Effort O&M Cost
Mobile, Internet
Data traffic showing growth primarily with Broadband access Broadband access emerging as the key demand on all type of user terminals
Generation of new revenue streams to increase the overall revenue from the existing subscriber base and improve ARPU
Adoption of converged network and services in line with the global trends
Converged Network Promises generation of New Revenue Streams as well as savings in CAPEX and OPEX as Network is Service Agnostic
Operator Ends up having a Network which does not offer any Services on its own
Essentially Service Provider is a 3rd Party
Operator can diversify into New Roles like Data Hosting , Wholesale Service Provider, Network or Infrastructure Provider
New Network roll out is CAPEX intensive The rollout strategy must ensure simultaneous roll out of New Services that can generate Revenue (Funds) for migration of whole network to NGN
Vendors have different migration plans Network Operations and Database Management need to be strengthened
There is an opportunity to diversify into New Roles like Data Hosting , Wholesale Service Provider, Network and Infrastructure Provider
Customer churn out can increase in absence of new offerings New Services roll out and Migration / Replacement of Legacy Network need to be planned simultaneously
Presence-driven Services
Find-Me, Follow Me
LocationBased Services
Consumer Services
Enterprise Integration
Converged VPN
Games
Push To Talk
Commerce
Multimedia
Instant Messaging
Wholesale Services
Voice Internet Data
Micro Payments
Video
31
QoS when unfettered access is available has to be made more broad based Multiple access methods for BB access need to be integrated
Fixed, Wireless, Mobile, Satellite BB access
32
Bandwidth Requirements
Service Broadcast TV (MPEG-2) HDTV (MPEG-4) PPV or NVoD VoD Picture in Picture (MPEG-2) Bandwidth (downstream) 2 to 6Mb/s 6 to 12Mb/s 2 to 6Mb/s 2 to 6Mb/s up to 12Mb/s QoS Requirement Parameterized Parameterized Prioritized Prioritized Parameterized
PVR
Interactive TV High-speed Internet Video Conferencing Voice/Video Telephony
2 to 6Mb/s
up to 3Mb/s 3 to 10Mb/s 300 to 750Kb/s 64 to 750Kb/s
Prioritized
Best effort Best effort Prioritized Prioritized
34
FTTH: EPON, GPON 100Mb/s: VDSL2 20Mb/s:VDSL2, ADSL2+ FTTC/B: FLC, EPON, GPON FTTN: FLC, EPON, GPON
100Mb/s
Data Rate
10Mb/s
1Mb/s: ADSL
10m
100m
1km
10km
Data Center
Quality of Personalization
Quality of Security
Quality of Mobility
Quality of Media
Network AAA;
Terminal, User, Mobility, Access etc.
39
Facilitating contents delivery over various convergence situation Supporting Mobility, Seamless handover etc. Minimizing Terminal and Network processing Identity Processing (multiple identity requirements) in Converged Environment
40
User ID
Customer ID
Service ID
Comm. ID
Content Owner ID Provider ID
Mobile Phone Nr
Family 1
Fixed Phone Nr
Media ID
Session ID
TCP/UDP Port ID IP Address ATM/Ether net ID MAC ID E.164 ID
Family 2
Family 3
Line ID
Family 4
41
NOC
Performance Fault Monitoring Provisioning
Part of NIB-II
CSCF
SPDF + ARACF
MGCF +AGCF
SG
SSSC
AAA + LDAP Core IP/MPLS Network
NOC
OSS
Performance Fault Monitoring Provisioning
EMS NMS Probes
Session Control
Session Manager
Centralized Databases
Transport
Softswitch
Access
Access
Voice VOD IPTV Internet
Devices
IPphones
Phone
SDTV/ HDTV High speed Internet
Policy driven
Dynamic control of any aspect of routing and forwarding from layer above
Performance
Performance for real time traffic
QoS/SLA guarantees
End to end scalable QoS It should provide isolation among various traffic classes. Real time & non real time service support One to one, one to many and many to many communications support Should support various types of traffic.
Scalability These networks shall be large is size hence scaling to high traffic volumes shall be essential
46
There may be a need to regulate contents in the context of NGN. Responsibility of network provider relating to content carried on the network be limited to identify the source of the content generation as long as it is provided by content providers Bulk selling and virtual network operations in the context of NGN needs to be considered Service providers should have full flexibility to have mutually agreed SLAs to provide end-to-end QoS for various applications
There will be need to have interconnect exchanges for exchange of IP traffic in NGN environment. However, it is recommended that the modalities of functioning of such exchange may be decided at appropriate time Present restrictions of setting up switching centers within the licensed area may be re-looked. Service providers may be provided flexibility to set up switching centers and transmission centers based on requirement anywhere within India de-linking from licensed area concept and do interconnection at least at one point in each licensed area Mandatory interconnection between telecom networks should continue. However, all NGN service providers should ensure interconnection to all existing telecom service providers by putting suitable equipments for providing interconnection to existing service providers
A committee may be formed under the aegis of Telecom Engineering Center (TEC) to work out country specific NGN standards and develop interface approval mechanism for NGN equipments to ensure smooth inter-operability subsequently Emergency number dialing from IP telephony subscribers be mandated, however, methodologies of such implementation be left to service providers Authentication of calling and called party identification be mandated, however, its implementation be left to individual service providers
Two NGN operators are to be interconnected through Session Border Controller (SBC), having support for different physical interfaces. All the interfaces should be provided with adequate redundancy with no single point of failure for that device
The Session Border Controller (SBC) may be a standalone separate device or SBC functionalities may be achieved through softswitch NGN and traditional PSTN/PLMN are to be interconnected through Media Gateway and Signalling Gateway
TEC is to prepare Interface Requirement (IR) for connectivity between two NGN networks The following standards based signalling protocols are expected to be used in Next Generation Network (NGN):
SIGTRAN - between PSTN/PLMN and IP networks H.248 - between Media Gateway and Media Gateway Controller SIP, SIP-T/SIP-I - between two IP networks & between PSTN/PLMN and IP networks H.323/SIP-T/SIP-I - for international Connectivity For delivery of content (voice/data/video etc.), RTP/RTCP protocol is to be used. TEC needs to prepare National Generic Requirements/Standards for the signalling protocols interfaces and also examine Interoperability issues
The Centralised Lawful Monitoring System (CMS)should be under the Government agency, say VTM cell of DoT and having connectivity with all service providers, LEAs and VTMs of DoT. Provisioning of targets as warranted by Law Enforcing Agencies (LEAs) should be done from CMS by DoT (VTM) without the intervention of service providers. TEC to prepare Generic Interface Specification for CMS NGN-eCO acknowledged that security is of paramount importance to any network. Therefore, TEC may be asked to work on various aspects of security for the country keeping in view the global trends National Numbering Plan needs to be modified to include NGN. TEC to study and give detailed recommendations
Session Border Controllers (SBC) functionality as described in para 3.1 should be used at borders, between two NGN operators. Calling party identification must be mandatory for routing the call in NGN networks In the short-term, existing billing mechanisms may continue as it is in PSTN/PLMN for inter-operator/intercarrier reconciliation and subscriber billing, which requires generation of CDR/IPDR records. In the long term, interconnect billing may be based on various other parameters such as bandwidth used, requiring alternative record keeping mechanisms which would depend on the methodology adopted for Inter Carrier settlement Service provider must have mechanism for traffic measurement to cover VoIP traffic measurement, voice intrusive & non-intrusive performance measurements etc
QOS ISSUES
Various network QoS classes to be defined for service offered through NGN network IP Packet Transfer Delay (IPTD), IP Packet Delay Variation (IPDV), IP Packet Error Ratio (IPER) , IP Packet Loss Ratio (IPLR), for real time/ non real time voice, data, video and streaming multimedia services. This should be defined for various classes of service separately In case of VoIP, toll quality and non toll quality parameters shall be defined. Customers should be made aware of the difference in Quality and tariff between the two services, by service providers. Interconnection congestion limit should be specified. Some percentage level should be defined for bandwidth utilization. Call Completion rate within network and across networks (inter network)
IPv6 implementation will be desirable for migration to NGN. However the need and time to migrate to IPv6 be left to service providers
NGN-eCO acknowledges the importance of net neutrality in NGN environment, however feels that no regulatory intervention is required at this stage A committee under aegis of Telecom Engineering Center (TEC) be constituted to study requirement of network synchronization and suggest methodologies of its implementation by various service providers across the networks. Based on the recommendation of TEC, DOT may issue directions which shall be compulsorily implemented by all service providers
Application Server
Soft switch
SBC
Other Networks
PRI
V5.2
AN
TMG
E1s
SSTP Network
57
Total No. of % Equipped %age of Exchange Equipped Capacity Exchanges (MSUs) Capacity 7 338 25 0.22% 10.78% 0.80% 83,219 8,967,304 921,353 0.18% 19.28% 1.98%
5-ESS
EWSD FETEX-150L C-DOT (SBM) C-DOT (MAX-L) C-DOT (MAX-XL) E-10 B Total
89
179 16 106 408 1,784 184 3,136
2.84%
5.71% 0.51% 3.38%
2,249,018
5,198,746 353,301
4.83%
11.18% 0.76%
1,713,398
3,742,849 180,761
5.13%
11.21% 0.54%
76.18%
72.00% 51.16%
51.60% 17,192,294
51.47%
71.63%
10.20%
2,982,338
8.93% 100.00%
62.86% 71.80%
100.00% 46,520,190
100.00% 33,402,436
As on 31.05.2007 As on 31.03.2008 As on 31.03.2009 As on 31.03.2010 As on 31.12.2010 Basic Telephone Total Number of connections WLL Total Number of connections Mobile Total Number of connections Internet Total Number of connections Broadband Total Number of connections IPTV Total Number of connections 1,120,000 2,747,624 28,423,283 3,599,544 33,149,457
31,491,984
29,917,385
28,421,516
27,000,440
5,400,000
8,400,000
10,800,000
12,840,000
56,430,000
92,430,000
128,430,000
155,430,000
2,827,000
3,675,100
4,777,630
6,210,919
7,480,000
13,480,000
19,480,000
23,980,000
200,000 103,828,984
1,400,000 149,302,485
2,600,000 194,509,146
3,800,000 229,261,359
Total
Access Layer
Fixed Line Access is designed for voice To be made capable of Broad band Multimedia access such that speeds in access are compatible with those in Wireless (42Mbps for HSPA, EVDO Rev C) so that FMC can be exploited Copper can give speed up to 26 Mbps only within 500 m FTTH, FTTB, FTTC is the solution
61
Transport Layer
IP/MPLS is currently available in 106 cities There is an immediate need for extending it to 322 SSAs for IP TAX By extending it to District and Taluka levels in addition to facilitating NGN other opportunities like SWAN can also be exploited It is Hub & Spoke model at national level which limits its scalability Similar models need to be replicated at Circle level The networks at Circle level can preferably be autonomous systems
62
Control Layer
IP TAX will introduce control elements for interfacing with PSTN to NGN Current 45.5 Million CMTS tender will introduce 3G R6 and IMS solution The above two implementations will provide platform for adoption of Fully Converged Network Architecture based on IMS for Fixed, Mobile, FMC with future upgrades
Service Layer
Full services possible after above two projects However, SIP based services can be introduced even now
63
64
65
Plan to add 6.4 million Class-4 Transit capacity in 2008-2009 through IP TAX Plan to Strengthen SSTP Networks to become the de-facto Signaling Network in BSNL
Can be used for Local Number Portability and MNP
Replacement of Legacy switches nearing expiry/expired switches to begin from 2008-2009 by Next Generation Switching Architecture
Plan to introduce SIP based services in 2008-2009 Migration to IMS and introduction of new applications
Applications like presence information, videoconferencing, multiparty gaming, community services and content sharing to roll out in a phased manner from 2009
For WLL Migration to LSMD from next procurement and Migration to MMD to begin from 2009
EVDO Rev A Hardware has already been asked for in the current WLL Tender To have year wise procurement plans for WLL in line with the developments of EVDO Rev B (2008-09) and EVDO Rev C (2009-2010) standards
To 3GPP Release 7 to integrate WLAN into NGN / IMS Core from next WiMAX procurement To migrate the Fixed Line Access, which at present is designed for Voice, to Broadband by a suitable mix of Wireless Access, Copper, FTTH, FTTB and FTTC solutions
To add FTTH to 500,000 ports in 2008; 700,000 in 2009 and 800,000 in 2010 To introduce FTTB and FTTC with VDSL2 wherever feasible; Tentative target may be 9 Million
To introduce Mobility in Broadband in 2009-2010 To have IP backbone at Circle, Zonal and National level
To extend IP core from 106 locations to all SSAs in 2008-2009 and to all DHQs in 2009-2010
Introduce IPv6 in IP Core 24 Core nodes to be fully meshed by STM-256 links to support Terabit throughput in Core
Full redundancy to be built in the core by having two routers at each location
The existing routers at Core locations to be moved to secondary layer Secondary nodes at Circle level to be connected to Core nodes at with 10 Gbps, 2.5 Gbps dual links
DWDM : 80 Gb/s
32 Channel 2.5G-DWDM L-1 to L-1 21 cities 40 channel 10G-DWDM : 400Gb/s L1 to L2 322 SSAs L2 to L3 cities : 2746
Video server
STM-64 Rings
STM-16/4/1 Rings COT ring Router STM-16/4/1 Rings Media Gateway RSUs/ RLUs/Lease d lines GSM MSCs
RTs
L1
L2 L3
Multi ADM On LH links Proposed STM-64 Endlinks for GSM MSCs
40 Chl 10G Tera bit DWDM Backbone Proposed ASON enabled High end OXC Proposed 32 Chl 2.5 G DWDM Backbone Proposed 2048 X 2048 High end OXC Proposed + MADMs MADMs & MSPP STM-16 City Access rings or SDCAs Rings NIB Routers / BB Lan Switches/ COTs/ BSCs/ TAXs/ STM-1 and CPE City Access Rings GSM BTS /DLCs /DSLAMs/RSUs/Customers
GSM
36.0 M Lines 50% 2G, 50% 3G 3.00 M Lines EVDO Rev 'A' 40 G Core 150 POPs
36. 0 M Lines 50% 2G, 50% 3G 2.4 0 M Lines EVDO Rev 'B' 40 G Core, 50 POPs RACF, NASS
36.0 M Lines 50% 2G, 50% 3G 2.80 M Lines EVDO Rev 'C'
WLL
MPLS Core IMS Core Layer and Services Class-5 SIP Based Services Pilot E-10B, NEAX, FETEX150L Replacement AXE-10, 5ESS through TMG AXE-10, 5ESS Replacement C-DoT MAX-L/MAXXL Migration to C-DoT AN thorugh TMG EWSD Migration to AGW OCB-283 Migration to AGW Q1 Calender Year
6.00 M Users
100.0 M Users
0.06 M Lines
1.00 M Lines
2.16 M Lines
1.45 M Lines
1.00 M Lines
7.00 M Lines
1.00 M Lines
0.76 M Lines
1.14 M Lines
1.90 M Lines
1.36 M Lines
2.04 M Lines
3.40 M Lines
Q2 Q3 2008
Q4
Q1
Q2 Q3 2009
Q4
Q1
Q2 Q3 2010
Q4
Q1
Q2 Q3 2011
Q4
Thanks