AMC PAMPHLET. AMCP 706-203
ENGINEERING DESIGN
HANDBOOK
HELICOPTER ENGINEERING
PART THREE
QUALIFICATION ASSURANCE,
HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY MATERIAL COMMAND APRIL 1972
[REPRINT by eae Eye Solutions, LLE ‘won tagletyaSolationstiC.comCECECEECCEC CCE CE
"EEC ECE EOEEEEC &(HEADQUARTERS
UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAKD
‘WASHINGTON, OC 20315
ANC PANPHLET 3 Ape 1972
No. 706-203,
ENGINEERING DESIGN HANDBOOK
HELICOPTER ENGINEERING, PART THREE
‘QUALIFICATION ASSURANCE
Paragraph
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS we
LIST OF TABLES : sil
FOREWORD. ee es xiv
PREFACE : : av
cuarrER 1
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2
AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
a NTRODUCTION a
22 AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION SPECIFICATION (AQS) 2
221 GENERAL, 2
222 AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION SPECIFICATION REQUIRE.
MENTS 2a
zag System Sate 23
2222 Design Reviews and Release of Drawings 23
2333 Moceups 23
2234 Procurement and Process Specifications 23
2035 (Component Tests 7 2
23351 Prequalification Bench Texts 2a
22252 Qualifeaion Tests 2
22333 ‘Tedown Tests a
pasa Relay Bench Tests a
2aass (Component and Subsytem Inspections 2
22256 letrical and Electronic Components FI
2226 System Surveys Bs
2237 Formal Contractor Demortions 2s
22271 ‘Demonstration Sites 26
22972 “Helopter Configuration for Demonstvations 26
22273, Contractor Plot Approval 26
23a74 “llcopter Flight Approval 26
2aa35 ‘Tes Conference 26
23376 Specie Demonstration Raguirments 26
233 ‘TEST SEQUENCING a
224 ‘TEST COORDINATION
aaa “Test Coordinator
2942 “Test Witness
2243 Cognizant Service Plant Activity 2
2244 ‘eat Witnessing Procedores 23
225 AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION SUBSTANTIATION REPORT: 29AMP 706-203
Paragraph
3124
3125
336
3137
3138
319
31210
san
313)
sia
a3
3s
Mo
2
Baa
323
32a
3332
3233
323
324
a
+
45
454
452,
a6
a
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
cuarrers
‘SYSTEM SAFETY
INTRODUCTION
‘OBJECTIVES
SYSTEM SAFETY PROCESS oS
Keown Presedent (Block A, Fig. 3-2)
Syem Delineation (Black B) :
System Hazard Analyses (lock C)
Hazard Identfeation (Block D)
Hazard Categorization and Evalution (Block F)
‘Ations) to Eliminate or Conteol Hazara) (Block F)
Medication of Systm Element() (Block G)
Effeivenesr Evaluation of Action Taken (Blok Hf) :
‘Acsident/Tncident Analysis lock 1)
‘Component/Sytem Test and Demonsrtion (Blok J)...
Tncrened Safty Assurance (Block K) :
Airworthiness Qualieation (Block L) :
ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY :
KNOWLEDGE OF HAZARDS H
CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDS. ==... 7
RESOLUTION OF HAZARDS i
SUBSTANTIATION OF HAZARD RESOLUTION =. 7
SYSTEM SAFETY PROGRAM PLAN (SSP?) :
‘GENERAL
SAFETY ANALYSIS AND HAZARD EVALUATION PROCEDURES
‘System Subeystem Haar Analysis
Fault Tree Analysis eee
Faire Mode and Hazardoas Effact Analysis (FMHEA) :
SAFETY TESTS. part
DATA, F
REFERENCES : 2
CHAPTER +
DATA AND DOCUMENTATION PROCEDURES AND
"REQUIREMENTS
INTRODUCTION ee 4
‘APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS : a
DATA REQUIREMENTS. es a
PROGRAM PLANS : pe
DESIGN REVIEWS : a
DESIGN DRAWING REVIEWS 000.0... D4
DATA FOR DESIGN REVIEWS 7 : 2
MOCK-UPS... 7 oo
ENGINEERING DATA os
‘AERODYNAMIC AND FLUTTER INVESTIGATION PROGRAM RE-
PORT 7 as
[AERODYNAMIC STABILITY AND CONTROL REPORTS 43‘AMP 706-203
‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
Digital and Aaclog Computer Program Report 4
Fight Simulator Progam Report ce
‘Aerodynamic Stablity and Control and Fying Quality Reports +
CHARACTERISTIC AND PERFORMANCE DATA. 4
ase Aerodynamic Data =... fee
Sibrantiaon of Performance Data Report Aeron as
Sandard Alzeraft Characteristics (SAC) Charts = a
WEIGHT AND BALANCE DATA... : 4s
STRUCTURAL DESIGN, ANALYSIS, AND TEST DATA a
HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING DATA, : as
SYSTEM SAFETY DATA eer +6
RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY DATA 46
SUBSYSTEM DESIGN APPROVAL DATA 4 46
General Arrangement Dravings 46
Inboard Profile Deawings ‘i 46
Rotors) and Propels) Drawings oo... +6
{tablsng/Coatal Surface Drawings a
Wing (Compound Hepes) Drawings a
ody Drawings a
Hull Drawing -- co a
landing Gene (Wheeliype) : o
Landing Gear (Stipe) a
Tanding Gear (Fea) a
Landing Gear (Skisype and Bear Paws) as
Engine (Main and APU), Transmission, nd Drives = +
ight Conran Sty Angmetton Spans “
‘leoreal Loe _ °
Mydrules and Pacumatis : to
Avionie = : “
‘nstrumestation and Navigational Equipment... 10
‘Seow Stations, Furnishings, end Eqopment 410
Survival Sytem to.
Environmental Control System. : 410
Equipment ae : “0
Armor and Armament au
Msoallaneoos : 4
PHOTOGRAPHS en
CONTRACT DETAIL SPECIFICATION REVISION PAGES 42
HELICOPTER INVENTORY RECORD. 42
TEST PLANS AND QUALIFICATION TEST REPORTS. +3
FORMAL DEMONSTRATION PLANS AND REPORTS ou
ENGINEERING MANUFACTURING DRAWINGS AND CON:
SOLIDATED DRAWING LIST _ e ais
4s Preparation of Drawings : 45
ens2 Consolidated Drawing List 415
“716 SUMMARY OF DATA AND DOCUMENTATION 45
“ REIORTS AND DATA ais
aan DATA SUBMITTAL, INSPECTION, AND ACTION 5AMCP 706-203
st
32
521
sata
5212
$213
5214
S243
5218
522
523
324
S24
3242
ot
ou
612
613
614
1s,
16
6
eu
622
ou
632
‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
‘Seba 420
Inspection 420
Actions 40
REVISION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTATION on
MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS ‘i 2
‘APPENDIX A~GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWINGS an
HAPTER s
MOCK-UPS
INTRODUCTION
MOCK-UP DEMONSTRATION REQUIREMENTS
FUSELAGE
Flight Crew Stations
‘Other Crew Stations, and Passenger and Cargo Compartments
Propulsion and Power Ssstem Mosk-up
Eletial/Elestonie Sytem Mocksp
ygralic and Preumatie System Moskeaps
Armament and Armor Mock-upe :
ROTOR HUBS AND BLADES.
LANDING GEAR :
LIGHTING MOCKUP
Interior Lighting
Extror Lighting
MOCK-UP REVIEW AND APPROVAL
‘MOCK-UP DISPOSITION
(OTHER SUBSYSTEM MOCK-UPS
REFERENCE anes
(CHAPTER 6
PROCUREMENT AND PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS
INTRODUCTION 6
GENERAL ei
MAKE-OR-BUY PLAN-PROCUREMENT. «1
END-ITEM COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS 1. 6
PURCHASE SPECIFICATIONS e
PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS : 61
(QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 62
FERROUS MATERIALS 62
GENERAL ; eo
RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST : 62
NONFERROUS METALLIC MATERIALS. e
‘GENERAL eo
RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST oss... 63
NONMETALLIC MATERIALS 6‘AMC? 706-203
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Paragraph Page
oat GENERAL 7 co 8
a2 RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST 6
421 Pasi ry
422 Elastomers 6a
e423 ‘ines and Other Ceramic Materials e
oa PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS 6
6s ‘COMPOSITES 64
65 (GENERAL : E 6
32 RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST 64
e521 Laminates 6
6522 Fllament-wound Strvtares e 6s
6523 Honeycomb and Sandwich Stactures 66
e524 ‘Amor Materials. fi 67
6525 ‘Advanced Compost: 67
6526 Special Requirements ee 67
66 ADHESIVES 6
661 ‘GENERAL : : : 6
662 RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST 6
663 PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS 6s
67 PAINTS AND FINISHES
ena ‘G2NERAL_ ee fi fi
67a, RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST
oa PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS
oe LUBRICANTS, GREASES, AND HYDRAULIC FLUIDS. :
eu GENERAL ete
a2 RSCEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST
os (CASTINGS, FORGINGS, AND EXTRUSIONS :
634 GENERAL
692 RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST 1) i
6921 Castings
6922 Forgings :
6923 Extrosions
10 SHEET METAL FORMING 5s
e101 ‘GENERAL. eis
102 RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST : 6s
103 PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS eis
en MACHINING OPERATIONS
eu GENERAL 61s
e112 RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST i : 616
613 PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS 616
62 JOINING OPERATIONS... iene : 618
e121 GENERAL es
6122 RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST =... : 6:6
61221 Welding cove 616
61222 Brazing Se
61223 Soldering : :
ens Riveting : 617
e225 wage Tints and Cables : : en
en HEAT TREATMENT enAMP 706-203
Paragraph
en1
6133
e134
61332
61333
61334
ra
eat
6182
eis
eis
6152
pare)
isa
mM
aa
722
723
724
eB
734
73
733
a
7332
rat
ran
ra221
742221
742322
742223,
ra2325
7423
yaaa
‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
GENERAL.
RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST
PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS
‘Stel
Alina Alloys
Copper Alloys
Tania
PEENING
GENERAL
RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST
PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS,
RECEIVING INSPECTION AND TEST
PROCESS SPECIFICATIONS :
INSPECTION, QUALITY CONTROL, AND CONFIGURATION CON:
‘TROL -
cuarrer7
COMPONENT TESTS AND QUALIFICATION
INTRODUCTION
(QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 0111.) :
FUNCTIONAL TESTS
‘STRUCTURAL TESTS
ENDURANCE TESTS.
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS :
(QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES
"TEST SPECIMENS
‘TEST PLANS ....
(QUALIFICATION BY SIMILARITY
Previously Qualified Contractor rises Euipment (CFE)
Previously Qualifled Governmencfurished Equipment (GFE)
(QUALIFICATION TESTS
‘TYPES OF COMPONENTS
‘TYPES OF TESTS :
unedonal Tests
‘Strutarel Tests
‘Component State Loud Tass
‘Component Fatigue Teste
Fatigue Test Requirements
Test Specimens
Frequency of Loading
Verifestion of Test Fixtures
Use of Tested Part
Endurance Tests ¥ oe f
Environmental Tete
Page
on
617
en
an
ei
oe
e9
69
69
os
619
6s
620
6m
620
70AMcP 706-203,
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Paragraph Page
yaaaa Laboratory Eavronmentl Simulation 730
Tada Shock 730
r424i2 “Vibration 710
742413 Send and Dist : a
ra3ate Slt Spray mn
yaaa Exteme Temperature a
T4246 in : mt
ya34ay Humidity a2
4242 Alttode : a
reve) Other Envizonmaats a
ts ‘TRANSMISSION AND DRIVE SYSTEM COMPONENTS mm
51 ‘TRANSMISSION AND GEARBOX BENCH TESTS ta
132 CLUTCHES... a3
153, BRAKES +4
34 SHAFTING, COUPLINGS, AND BEARINGS 000... 7s
Ta ‘Shating and Couplings ws
saa Barings : : 716
155 ACCESSORIES 76
16 DOCUMENTATION 78
REFERENCE. a eae m8
HELICOPTER SURVEYS
LIST oF SYMBOLS
INTRODUCTION
‘GENERAL
FLIGHT LOAD SURVEY PLAN >
‘TEST REQUIREMENTS
INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ANALYSIS
OCUMENTATION
ENGINE VIBRATION SURVEY
GENERAL
ENGINE VIBRATION SURVEY PLAN
Airframe Manufactarer Requirements.
Engine Manufacturer Coordination
‘TEST REQUIREMENTS,
(Ground Teste
Fight Tests osc
INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ANALYSIS
DOCUMENTATION : 7
PROPULSION SYSTEM TEMPERATURE SURVEY ee
GENERAL woos 88
PROPULSION SYSTEM TEMPERATURE SURVEY PLAN 2
TEST REQUIREMENTS 89
Ground Tests 2
Fight Tests 3
INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ANALYSIS #10‘AMP 706-203
Paragraph
eas
es
51
53
e532
e833
esa
bss
6
B61
62
63
e631
rr)
S91
$92
92
sont
eon
ee21i2
e213
#9212
e212
92122
92123
a
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
DOCUMENTATION
ENGINE AIR INDUCTION SYSTEM SURVEY :
GENERAL
ENGINE AIR INDUCTION SYSTEM SURVEY PLAN
‘TEST REQUIREMENTS
Ground Tests
Flight Tes
Effect on Engine Performance
INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ANALYSIS
DOCUMENTATION
[ENGINE EXHAUST SYSTEM SURVEY
GENERAL :
ENGINE EXHAUST SYSTEM SURVEY PLAN
TEST REQUIREMENTS
‘Grovnd Tess
Fight Tests : ‘i
haus Sytem Endurance Tet
INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ANALYSIS
DOCUMENTATION
‘TOTAL SYSTEM VIBRATORY SURVEY
GENERAL
GROUND VIBRATION TESTS
Airfame Vibration
Rotor System Vibration
FLIGHT TESTS
INSTRUMENTATION :
DOCUMENTATION
‘CREW ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY ‘
GENERAL
(CREW ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY PLAN
TEST REQUIREMENTS
Ground Tests
Flight Tet
Climatic Hangar Tests
INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ANALYSIS
DOCUMENTATION
HELICOPTER SYSTEM SURVEYS.
GENERAL
INFRARED (IR) RADIATION AND COUNTERMEASURE SYSTEM
SURVEY
Passive IR Gountermeasare Tes
‘Aitame/IR Suppressor Compatity Tests
Ground Tests ss
Fight Tests
Instrumentation and Data Analyse
1 Signature Survey
Ground and Hovering Conditions ‘
Flyby Test Condition
Instrumentation and Dae Anaya
26
26
24
524
2s
225
526
£26aucr 706-203
296211
96212
#96213,
soszia
s96215
94622
96221
£96222
96223,
e963
e964
897
on
#972
9721
9722,
$973
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
usteation Teste
Active IR Countermeasure Sytem
Flight Test Conditions
Instrumentation and Data Analysis
Documentation :
RADAR REFLECTIVITY SURVEY
‘Radar Refletiviy Survey Plan :
Scale Model Tecniqnes
‘eat Requirements
Instrumentation and Dats Anais
Documentation 7
LIGHTNING PROTECTION SURVEY
ighning Protection Survey Plan
iphning Laboratory Tests
iphining Chest
Documentation
IGG SURVEY
ising Survey Plan
est Requirements
Teing Tunnel Tests
(Clear, Dry Ait Flight Teste
Simulate Icing Fight Tests
[Natural Teing Fight Tess
Insiramentation and Data Analysis
‘Photographic Recording i
Recording of leing Conditions|
System Performance and Power Recording
ACOUSTICAL NOISE SURVEY (INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL)
‘Acoutial Note Survey Plan
Test Requtemens
Tnteral Nese
Helicopter Operational Modes
Instrumentation
Noe Measurement
‘Weapon Noe Messorement
Inieigiilty Tete
Extemal Nee
Helicopter Operational Modes
Instromentaon
Nowe Measurement
Dasa Analysis
Dooumentaton :
(CLIMATIC LABORATORY SURVEY
timate Laboraton
(Gimati Laboratory Tests
Test Requirements
Instrumentation and Data Analysis
Documentation
REFERENCES i‘Aucp 706-203
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
CHAPTER 9
HELICOPTER SYSTEM DEMONSTRATIONS
90. LIST OF SYMBOLS:
. INTRODUCTION
92 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY DEMONSTRATION
baa GENERAL
923 STATIC TEST PROGRAM es e a
9221 Test Requtemens
9222 Instrumentation and Data Analysis 7 : :
9223 Documentation
923 LANDING GEAR DROP TESTS : :
9234 Test Requirements
baa ‘Whee! Gear : : 7 :
923.14 ‘Test Procaures
paaii2 Tastrmentation and Data Analysis peer :
92342 Skid Gear
pasta “Test Procedies en
923122 Instrumentation and Data Anslyas
o232 Documentations... eee
one STRUCTURAL DEMONSTRATION
oat ‘Test Requirements o-sssseeesesee . i
Saat “Test Manesvers
bata Iastrmentation and Data Anal - 0... l0sccccsooseceeneoee
5242 Dooumentation|
38 PROPULSION AND POWER SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION
534 GENERAL
532 ENGINE/AIRFRAME COMPATIBILITY TESTS ssc... ssss0o0.
9321 Test Requirements
pata “Ground Tes ws. : SUIS
oan ropalson Contras
5328114 Power Lever Coats. EE :
S32L1LL1 —— Eopina(s) Stopped
S32ULIL2 Engels) Running
p3auii2 Starting and Acceleration to Ground fle
o3anit3 Acceleration and Deoderation Tests :
oaautls ‘Gas Gmnerstor Control and Power Turbine Governor Seni:
9320118 Power Control Anilpaoe and Droop Cum Characteristics
oaaui2 ‘Rotor Contras vs.
9328124 Hehcopter Dynamic Syatem-—Eagine Compati
9324122 ‘Allgament and Output Sbat Unbalane ss... ei
93a42 ‘right Tess
932124 Propulsion Controle 2) 7 e :
saztaa Ate Restars :
9321212 gine Acceleration nd Decleation Tests es
9321213 Gat Generator Fos! Control
gani2ie Power Tartine Governor and Spied Response Time
gaatais Power Control Aniipator and Droop Compensation Cam CharactersParagraph
ga21216
eazi22
o32i221
53a1222
93213,
932131
932434
Persery
9321313
ss213t4
saai32
932133,
oaate
93215
933
pan
S334
93312
53343
9333
9334
9335
9336
9337
O34
9341
sand
934814
S32
934113
patie
oats
S3atte
3407
saatit4
s3a1i72
saani73
o3eLira
s3ati7s
S3ALLI6
S3AtI77
94a
3421
o34ni2
o342t3
‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
[Esablishment of Minimum and Masimom Power Turbine Speeds
Holiopter Contras
Haliopier Dynamic Sten-Engine Compatisy
Alignment and Outpo Shaft Untalance
Enginestarting Tests
Ground Tests
Ambient Temperature Tots
Lowetemperatire Tests
ighvtemperatne Tests
Ground Power/Ambient Temperature Tests
Fight Tet
Instrumentation
striction Tess
Stcondary Power Sys Tests
Docimentation|
“TRANSMISSION AND DRIVES
Test Requirements
Prequalification Tests
ualiication Tests
‘Tadown Tests
Istrementation
Disssembly
Inspection
Rett,
CGhtches and Brakes
‘Shafing, Couplings, and Bearings
LUBRICATION AND FUEL SUBSYSTEM DEMONSTRATION
LLabriction Subsystems Demonstration
“Tet Requirements
Measurement of Usable Oi1
Measurerient of Oil Tank Expansion Space
if Tank Pressre Tet
‘il Syst Bypass Demonszaion
(i Vent System Test
‘Oi! Tank Quantity Calibration
(it Cooling
Hover Coating
tint Cooting
(Crise Coning
(Other Flight Conditions
Addisonal Cooling Tests
Deterinacion of Cooling Merging
Chip Detector Demonstration
‘us Subsystem Demonstration
TIntemal and External Ful Tank Cepaciies
Tank Capacity
‘Avalable Fue!
‘Semp Capacisy
AMC? 706-203,
948
oe
pee
out
ok
ou
oe
ong
549
su
9
919
519
319
319
99
920
920
521
92
22
52
5.3
9.35
925
95
9.
925
925
5.6
7 925
96
96
56
9.26
5.26
9.5
926
926
oa)
oa
9.27
9239
‘ANC 706-203
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
)
Paragraph Page -
gaat Residual Fost oat +
oan Expansion Space : 927 -
93.4216 Aunlary Foe! Provisions 327
934217 Loweletel Fast Warning Sytem 927 >
934218 Fuel Quanity Gaging Subsystem Tests 928 o
93422 Refcting and Defoling Test ae
934221 Refueling 528 a
534222 Surge Pressre Test 928 A
934223, Detueling Tet 928
o34a28 {loved Gronit Refusing Systm Tests 928 a
934225 Siphoning Tests ; 9.8 7
934226 (Centers gravity (CG) Travel Tet 538
93423 Boost and Transfer Pump Faire Tete 9.28 7
o34a31 Ground Tete 329 -
934232 Flight Tests 9.29
934233 ‘Vapor/Liquid Ratio Teste 529
saaa8 [Fu Supply and Fuel Transfer Teste 929
934241 Pel Supply Tests 929 S
934242 Inurl Tank Switchover and Fuel Transfor Rates 929
934243 Exteral Tank Fesdout 529 7
534248 Fal Jetson 9.29
53425 Fuel and Veot Sytem Tass 9.29 -
934251 Presurzation and Pel Vent Systrn Tete 9.29 +
934252 Vent Outlet Teng Tess 5.30
934233 Vent Sytem Failure Tes : 330 *
33426 Fel Tank Purge (¥ applicable) 930 -
934261 Ground Tess : 330
b34n62 Flight Tests ssc... 930 o
93427 Crshworthy Fal § : 50 ~
935 ROTORS AND PROPELLERS 9-30
9354 oor System Demonstration : 30 *
pasta Rotor Whirl Tes =. 530 >
o3sa2 Praiminary Fight Approval Text 30
93513 1s0-hr Tiedown Test : 331
9352 Prope System Demonstrations oa 7
93521 "Test Requirements oa
935214 Ground Tests baa 7
935212 Flight Tests. 33 e
93522 Spacal Tess oa
935221 ‘Whit Flaner 333 eT
935222 Balance oa 4
93523 Instrumentation 933 -
oasaa Documentation 96 :
936 ENGINE VIBRATION DEMONSTRATION 936 ~
93.61 Engine Vibration Demonstration Pl 337 -
9362 ‘st Requirements 337 7
93.621 Ground Tete 3° a
93622 ight Tess 938 os
9363 Insermentation and Dats Anaya 339AMC? 706-203,
‘TARLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Paragraph Page
9364 Documentation 939
baz PROPULSION SYSTEM TEMPERATURE DEMONSTRATION 939
937 ‘ropubsion System Temperature Demonstration Pian 939
5372 ‘est Requirements 939
93721 Ground Tests 539
93722 Flight Tests 939
oa33 Inetrmentation nd Data Anais 539
9374 Documentation 9.39
baa ENGINE AIR INDUCTION SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION 339
538 “gine Air Induction System Demonstration Plan S40
eres Test Requirements 340
93821 Ground Tests 540
92822 Fight Tests 940
938221 Inlet Presture Recovery 40
s3aaa2 Inlet Temperature Level 340
o38223 (ther Inlet Pressure and Teropeatore Distortion Mets 540
reves Instrumentation ad Data Analisis oat
ose Documentation 942
oe DYNAMIC INSTABILITY DEMONSTRATION : 92
oa GENERAL, ive
942 GROUND RESONANCE 2
9421 Test Requiemens| 92
baa Documentation 943
943 BLADE FLUTTER e oa
Sas SURHARMONIC VIBRATORY MODE
AERODYNAMIC DEMONSTRATION
PERFORMANCE SUBSTANTIATION
“Tet Requirements
sata Level Plight Performance
osa12 CCimb Performance
95213 Hover Performance
os214 ‘Avtortalonl Performance
55215 ‘Aepeed Calibration
95216 Determination of Power Available
983 FLYING QUALITIES DEMONSTRATION
9531 “est Requirements
os ‘Sate Longin Staity
95312 Sate Lateral-irectonal Stay
osat3 Sideward and Rearward Fight
sate ‘Trim Requirements
Peer) Controllability 950
95316 Dynamic Say 330
psa “Manexvering Stab 3-0
sae Roll Characteristics, ost
95319 ‘Astoroaton Eotries ost
$5310 ‘Stalty Augmentation Sysicm Files ost
e531 Quaiative Pot Evalesion 931
9532 Documentation 3stMCP 706-203,
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Paragraph Page Z
96 ELECTRICAL DEMONSTRATION 92 7
96 GENERAL, 3 2
9-62 ELECTRICAL ANALYSIS REPORT 953
963 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION TESTS 953, ~
9-631 Ground Tests 353
9.63.11 letrieal Lond Measurements $s
$6312 Primary Power Sytem Tests os :
563124 [AC Primary Electrical Sytem Tass os =
963122 De Primary Electra! Sytem Tests 3 °
56313 Conversion Power Texts : ose re
oesi4 Emergency Power Tests os
56315 Fault Protection and Detection 955
96316 leccial System Installation oss >
5-63.17 leeieal Engine staring Sytem Tests 955 a
5632 Flight Tess 955
564 DOCUMENTATION 956 :
97 AVIONIC DEMONSTRATION 936 -
oa GENERAL 956
972 AVIONIC AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION : 356 a
721 “Avloae Airworthiness Quafeaton Test Ground Staton 956 Bh
9722 Production Tests : 836
9723 ‘Avinie Test Specifications 937 a
9728 letrical Power Verifoation 937 f
973, ANTENNA PERFORMANCE SUBSTANTIATION 95 t
9731 Seale Model Antenna Test Program 95 a
9732 ‘Antanas Subsystem Qualification 97 5
9733 [Antenna Performance Tests 38
5734 Ground Tests ose -
5738 Flight Tess 38 =
97350 ‘Antenna Pater Tests 3s
o7382 ‘Maximam Range Tests 3 -
9736 Operation! Tents 38
9737 octmentstion| 339
ora (COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 30 a
974 ‘Component Tests 0 as
742 ‘Aslone Subsystem Ground Tess 9.60
97421 “Test Requirements $0 F
97422 Acworthines: Qualification Grovnd Tess 90 4
s7aa21 Visual Inspection 50
974222 Cooling Tests 90
974223 RF Output Power and VSWR Tass s
974228 ‘Transmitter Modulation Checks $1
974225 Operational Tests re
974226 Maintainapiity Tests 61 ps
974227 Rejeton Criteria 3.1 :
o74a Prodtion Ground Teste ot .
saga Visual Inapestion 3-81 :
97432 [RF Output Power and VSWR Tess ost
97433 Operational Tests oot‘AMcP 706-203,
‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Paragraph re
o7434 Rejetion Criteria 7 981
oa Avion Sabajtem Fight Tess. 361
o74a “Airworthiness Qualifaion Fight Tats ot
Saat ‘Antenna Patierss : é 3a.
sada Range Tests 3a
974413 Performance Tests 5.6
74d Vibratory Tes : 9.0
STAkIs Cooling Tests ees 9.83
97442 Production Fight Tes : : 963
boaana Test Requirements. i 9.65
o74422 Operational Tests 98
974423 Rejection Cetera : 363
935 NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT ‘i oe
9753 Component Fess oe
9732 [Navigation Subeystem Ground Teis 58
97521 Test Procedures = 9.63
o7s2a ‘Avion Airworthnes Qualification Ground Tests 5.88
975221 ‘rua Inpostion a eceee seo 9-66
595222 Cooling Tests : i Sst
975223 Operational Tests : oe
9752231 VOR Systems | ee
9752232 ADF Sytem ea oe
9752233 Gyromagnete and Standby Compass Systems 964
975224 Rejetion Criteria : 8.65
97323, Production Ground Tests anne os
9752 Navigation Subsystem Flight Tests : 5-65
S738 ‘Attworhines Qualifetion Pghe Tess. : os
oassta ‘Test Requirements... 3.65
9753114 VOR systems : 368
o753112 ADF Stems = 9.65
S753 Gyromagnei and Standby Compass Syste 9.68
o7s3ti8 Vibration Tests : 9-66
s7sanis Cooling Tests a : 9.56
9754 Production Fight Tess 9.65
976 ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC) 966
oe HYDRAULIC AND PNEUMATIC SUBSYSTEM DEMONSTRATION 9.6
981 GENERAL : 3686
932 HYDRAULIC SUBSYSTEM 3.67
3821 Ground Tests 7 98
ant Hydrate Steps Mockyp 261
ania Sytem Provisions vos : 36
98213 Contamination Prottlon 2000s 5.68
seats “est Requirements : : 5.60
saatai Peak Presse : 9.69
os2ia2 Sytem Temperature Determination way)
9a2i43 ‘Subsystem Cyting 20
oentas Minimum Reservoir Level and Presure 3:70
santas ‘Ausllary Pump Operation « ae 5:70
982146 Stating Systems : 970errs 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Paragraph Page
992147 Brake Subeystem Tests (Whee! end Rotor) “
9822 Fight Tes 7
oa2a Servicing Cs
98222 Instrumentation es
98223 Preflight Tess
902234 Ground Teste
982232 Taxi and Hover Tess 3
oaaa4 Flight Tests és
oaa24t Fight Control Syste Flight Tet = A
592242 Unity Subsystem Fight Test, -
383 PNEUMATIC SUBSYSTEM DEMONSTRATION ze
oat ‘Ground Tess :
93.1 High-pressure Poeumatie Sbeysems a
os3i2 Low-pressure Pneumatic and Vacuum Subrystems :
basa light Tests
9333 Docamentation >
3 INSTRUMENT DEMONSTRATION A
on ‘GENERAL
992 (QUALIFICATION TESTS a
393 ‘ACCEPTANCE TESTS :
394 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS
505 INSTALLATION TESTS >
9951 ‘Shock snd Vibratory Qulieation i
5952 Fensional Tests
basa Mainainabilty Qualification >
5-10 FURNISHING AND EQUIPMENT DEMONSTRATION *
suo GENERAL :
102 PERSONNEL ACCOMMODATIONS : A
9-102, Personnel Vsbilty : e
9.10211 Sey side Pilot Hiopier
9.19212 Single ilt/Tandem Pilot or Observer 7
9.1022 ‘Crew Sation Environmental Contol Spam (ECS) i
9.1023 Internal Acoustical Environment
s1024 ‘Toxicology C
9.1025 Seating Parnishines
ou1026 Ingress and Eases :
9.1027 Emergency Evacuation =
9.103 ‘CARGO PROVISIONS, ‘ :
‘Cargo Compartment Floors
‘Tiedown Fitings and Devices e -
Cargo Doors and Ramee ao
Wineh Systems e
Conveyors and Tracks >
Hoist Systems ~
Carga Hook Syste
Tefight Demonstration
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEMS os -
eating, Ventilating, and At-onditioning Systems as
Defoging, Defrosting, and Anteiing/Desing Syetems : 96 ~
3AMP 706-203,
a
‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Paragraph Page
1043 Onygen System on
out ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC) DEMONSTRATION 987
outa GENERAL 987
ona HELICOPTER ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM. 9-38
out ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY BOARD oat
our4 SUBSYSTEM INTERFERENCE CONTROL
sana ‘Acpliable Specification
sunaa Interference Contrl Pan. 7
suias Stieytem Test Pl :
uaa Laboratory Test on
outa Sibeymem Test Report
8 INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT IN HELICOPTERS
3 HELICOPTER SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY
Sune! “Appiable Speciation (System) : :
sur62 ulcoper Systm Test Plan 7
sabes Stem Test :
sun6a Stem Text Report :
312 ARMOR AND ARMAMENT SUBSYSTEM DEMONSTRATION 5.90
in ‘GENERAL 7 7 30
922 ‘ARMOR DEMONSTRATION 5.90
suzza "at Program es 9at
91222 ‘eat Requirements : ‘ : 9a
9222 “elcoper Pevformance Tests : 931
sun222 ‘Armor Compatibility 7 9a
92223 alii Tests : : : 992
9223 Validation : 992
pareeny ‘Suvivaiy 592
17232 Vulnerable Area Determination ‘ 89
912233 Penetration Data 993
sunze survivability Analjis Repor 993
923 [ARMAMENT SUBSYSTEM DEMONSTRATION : 308
ona ‘Test Requirements o 995
ours Failure Analysis =. : 55
5ua342 Ground Tests 998
sua324 ‘Cockpit Procedures 7 995
puz3i22 ‘Armament and/or Fire Controls 993
su23123 Sighting and Boresghtng 995
ouasi24 Arming Procedares at)
Parened) Firing Test 996
5123126 Environmental Considerations e 9.96
923427 Blast ots fi 9.96
523128 Flach Intensity : 996
su2313 Fight Tests : oa
sua3t34 NNonfising Flight Tes 997
sz343ta Handling Quaies and Performance 99
Su2ar312 Jetson on
su3st313 Loads and Vibration 997
ou23132 Firing Fight Tests 397
1231324 [Noise Leve! Determination : % 997‘AMcP 705-203
‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) v
Paragraph Page
9231322 Gas Contamination Measurement 997 =
9231323 Debris Dispersion 3o7
91231324 Handling Qualities e 9.98 7
9u2ai32$ “Loads and Vibration 9.98 x
91231326 ‘Accelerated Service Tests 5.98
9.231327 Engine Performance 998
9231328 Temperature Profile Determination for Armament Subsjeicm Conicls. 9.98
91231329 System Accuricy . 998
su2a.4 letromapneie Compatiiity (EMC) Tes 9.98 a
1232 Documentation 9.98 =
ous EXTERNAL STORE SEPARATION DEMONSTRATION 5.98
ou GENERAL 998 e
oz SEPARATION CHARACTERISTICS ©... 9.99
3103 JETTISON REQUIREMENTS, 99
s34 RELEASE SYSTEMS . 9.9 2
S135 RECOVERY OF STORES 99 s
o36 FAILURE MODE 5.99
95137 ‘TEST REQUIREMENTS : 999 °
ousza Weight and CG Losstons| ee aeon| +
9.13.72 ‘Speed Envelope 999
9373 Aide 9-100 >
e378 ‘Anitede ‘i : 9.100 a
ou378 Flight Modes : 9-100
one DOCUMENTATION 9.100 z
ous HELICOPTER ENDURANCE TEST S01 -
REFERENCES, 9.101 f
CHAPTER 10 :
[RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY
100 LIST OF SYMBOLS. : rot :
101 RELIABILITY. : Tot
out [RELIABILITY MATHEMATICAL MODELS wot 4
rout Soooes Citra tot a
rou Relslity Block Disgrame : 102
ros Model Construction and Combining Rais 02 o
1012 INITIAL APPORTIONMENTS i 103
1013 RELIABILITY PREDICTIONS 10s
1014 RELIABILITY ANALYSIS—DEVELOPMENT AND TEST PHASES 104 >
roa “Test Plans os -
10142 Reliability Considerations for Development Testing os
10143 Reliability Demonstration tos >
02 MAINTAINABILITY zi 108 :
1021 -MAINTAINABILITY CRITERIA. os
m2 Mainainabiicy Analysis 06 >
Maintenance Policy =. os -
0213 Maintenance Enginceing Anaiyis Dats Sytem (MEADS) 108
1022 MAINTAINABILITY DEMONSTRATION, 108
aiauc 706-2
103
Paragraph
1224
102221
02222
10223
woa2s
102242
io225
102251
10226
02261
102262
102263
1023
10231
10232
3234
1432344
‘TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Change Approval Policy fi
Contractor Component Verifeation
(Component Repair
{Component Overs
Yendor and Subcontractor Maina
Makeup
‘System VeiScation
‘Configuration Review
‘ategory I Tet (Contain)
‘Preventive Maintenance (PM)
Corrective Maintenance
Category I Tests (Goverament Test Agency)
“Task Selection :
Contractor Maintainabity Demonstration
Contract Compliance Demonstration
‘TRANSPORTABILITY z
Transportabiity Criteria
Transportabity Demonstration
REFERENCE. :
CHAPTER 11
GOVERNMENTAL TESTING
tasr oF svaemois
INTRODUCTION :
COORDINATED TEST PROGRAM (CT)
Connors Devdopomt sad Alors Qa ee
frmy Pliny Basson (APE)
Sadun Fos
Awrdines sa Fight Charice Tos .
Gimate To
Save Tee
Anu PRELIMANARY EVALUATION (APD)
12D PREREQUISITE
Derails on TEST
onstonal Tee
ening Quits
Petrie .
sonseacttn Axi PRELAANARY EVALUATIONS
MEM PRELIMINARY EVALUATION REPORTS
FINAL AIRWORTHINESS AND FLIOHY CHARACTERISTIC TESTS
GENERAL
‘st Poi
uameoce Tre
Sibi aad Cotl Tae
Miao Toe
‘irony Te Sane
Treat Regurencas
a
Tet
wa‘AMP 706-203,
Paragraph
ma2312
1132313,
113232
1132324
1132322
1132323,
113233
1132331
1323314
14323312
1132332
1132333,
113234
132341
1323611
1323412
3236
1132361
323.62
32363
113237
1132394
maz3711
11323712
32372
1132373
i
s
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Insrumentation :
Documentation es
Static Longitudinal Sabiy Tes
Test Requirements =... :
Instrumentation
aocumentation
Dymic Longitudinal Sabily Tess
‘Test Requirements
Short Period Mode
[Long Period Mode
Instrumentation
Documentation... ete
Maneuvering Staiity Tests
‘Test Raquiremeass
Symmetrical Pullaps
‘Stablize Turning Flight
Inctrumentation
‘Documentation He
‘Sta Lateral-rectional Sait Tests
‘Test Requirements :
Insromenttion
Documentation 10.0... E
Dynamic Latera-trectonal Sabity Tes
‘Test Requirements r= 7 cana
Instrumentation
Documentation
Controlaity Tes
‘Test Requirements 00... eee
Longiesdinal Coatrallty
“Lateral and Directional Conrail
Inetrumeniation
Documentation --- ey
Control Harmony
CLIMATIC TESTS
DOCUMENTATION
GLOSSARY
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS :
SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL
DOCUMENTS
BIBLIOGRAPHY : :
INDEX . : :AMP 706-203,
————————
5:10
out
22
8
oa
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
‘Title
system Safety Milestones in Enginering Development fi
System Salary Process i"
"The Load Characterstce of Five Types of Destructive Tests for Aakesives
‘Mart Tooling Coordination
Proton Criterion
Vibrtory Tolerance Criteria
Heopter Configurations =~
Data Flow for Engine/Airfame Vibration Evaluation
‘est Iasvumeatation :
Inlet Resovery vs Fight Speed 2.0.0.1
Presure Distortion Plot
Example Summary of Text Penis -0.....
‘Typial Plots of Rotor Natural Prequency ve Operating Spent
US Army Payebrometric Chart
‘Gri for Typeal Hebooptr Fly-by of Misi Simuitor
Flight Test Demonstration Methods...
igt-vltage Long are Tes Arrangement
{Component Sparking and Induce Voltage Test Arangement
‘Clinatic Laboratory, Main Hangar, Eglin AFB, Florida
Enghestarting Characteristics z on
‘Starer Performance - ei
Engine and Transmission Oi Systems During Stars
Summary, Engine Ol Temperature and Pressure
Sunmary, Windshield Detog Temperature a
‘Windshield Defog Temperature Survey
“lensr System Tenpertare and Pressure Survey
Sommary, Corkpt Inet Temperate and Prasre :
Summary, Cockpit Temperatize
(Cockpit Temperature Survey, Bled Air Heater
‘Sonmary, Control Breakout Force: Rotors Stationary, Fiction OT
‘Summary, Control Breakout Force: Rotors Turning, Hyéraulie Boost On, Friction
‘ant Force Tein OF ss
Sonmary, Engine Temperature Survey Be
UAtitade of Seid Gear for Drop Conditions TT and 11 37
‘Engine Tremient Torque Response to a Step Demand for Torque Change os
Dut Reduction (Determination of Damping Ratio and Frequency from Tine
“Hktory Recordings) 920
“Typical Lubrication Subsystem 928
‘Tyieal Propeller Vibratory Survey Instrumentation ot
Ouillopraph Recording 7 935
Revording Instrumentation in Aira... 936
Prepllr Stes Survey Sip Char 937
Vitratory Stress Survey Summary 538
[Ect of Prerore Recovery on Engine Performance : oat
ample of Cloverlst Fight Pia, 30-deg Intervals 939
Sytem Setup end Instrumentation ot
‘Ruborne Compressor charged System O74
‘Low-presure Pneumatic Spply q 995
wi‘AMCP 706-203,
SS
sail
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
Tite Page
Lowpresure Pneumatic Subsystem ‘i 975
Test Apparatus Schematic . 9.76
‘Typical Vacuum Subsystem : 9.76
Sie-byide Helicopter Vision Plot oat
Single Pilot/Tandem Pot Helicopter Vision Pict )s000... 9.82
Winch System Angular Displacement... ot
Winch System Operational Demonstration
‘Typcal Format for Specifying Vulnerable Areas fi
Vulnerable Area vs Weight... '
Jetson Envelope Caleultion :
Vibeatory Leet eesoen
Satis Longitudinal Calecive Fined Stability
‘Stas Longitudinal Hovering Stblty
Forward Longitudinal Pale
Alt Longludinal Pulse ei Fer
Maneuvering Stay
State Latraliretion Stability... cars
Right Lateral Pulse
Normal Ascleration Development During Sudden Control Dispiacemeat
‘Damping Characteristics i Frequency s+. 5
“Longitudinal Control Sensitivity Summary eres
‘Longitudinal Contol Seat sever. 000 A
‘Longitudinal Control Response Summary... :
‘Longitudinal Control Respone, Level Flight :
Longitudinal Control Power +. oe“Table No,
a
22
3
34
a
Pay
er
6
6s
66
6
m4
2
a
AMP 706.203,
LIST OF TABLES
Tite
SUMMARY OF CTP TEST REQUIREMENTS—HELICOPTER SYSTEM
SUMMARY OF CTP TEST REQUIREMENTS—ALLIED EQUIPMENT
HAZARD SEVERITY FOR HELICOPTERS. =
HAZARD PROBABILITY FOR HELICOPTERS
HAZARD ELIMINATION/CONTROL RESOURCES
HAZARD TOTEM POLE.
DATA AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
SAMPLE BASELINE CHECKLIST FOR SEATS AND FURNISHINGS
METALS, TEST METHODS OF FEDERAL TEST METHOD STANDARD
NG. 151
‘TEST METHODS FOR PLASTICS AND BONDED STRUCTURES
‘TESt METHODS FOR CORE MATERIALS AND SANDWICH STRUC-
‘TURES :
ALPHABETICAL INDEX’ OF TEST METHODS OF FEDERAL TEST
"METHOD STANDAED NO. 175
SELECTED TEST METHODS OF FEDERAL TEST METHOD STANDARD
‘NO. 141
SELSCTED TEST METHODS OF FEDERAL TEST METHOD STANDARD
‘NO. 791
ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CASTINGS, MIL-C¢021
STEEL, FORGING TEST REQUIREMENTS BY GRADE.
REPRESENTATIVE HEAT TREAT TEMPERATURES,
EXAMPLE COMPONENTS REQUIRING QUALIFICATION
EXAMPLE FUNCTIONAL TESTS.
[ARMOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION
‘TYPICAL HELICOPTER MANEUVER SPECTRUM
READ OPTION TERMS
‘TARGET ECHOING AREA
SIGNIFICANT RADAR FREQUENCY NOMENCLATURE :
LIGHTNING CURRENT COMPONENTS AND EFFECTS
ICING PROTECTION SYSTEM TEST FACILITIES ..
DATA. REQUIREMENTS, ENGINE/AIRFRAME COMPATIBILITY
DEMONSTRATION
SPECIFICATIONS FOR FLIGHT, NAVIGATION, AND ENGINE INSTRU-
MENTS 7
[ARMAMENT SUBSYSTEM TEST REQUIREMENTS
LATERAL-DIRECTIONAL DYNAMIC STABILITY
Ee
Er
46
63
66
69
eu
on
ra
15
ee
235
40
ous
978
9.96
m0AMC? 706-203,
FOREWORD
‘The Helicopter Engineering Handbook forms a part ofthe Engineering Design =
Handoook Series which presents engineering dats forthe design and constuction of
‘Aamy equipment.
This volume: AMCP 706-203, Qualfcation Assurance, & Prt Thee ofa tnee-
part Engincering Design Handbook led Helicopter Engineering. Along with AMCP
706-201, Preliminary Design, and AMCP 706-202, Deal Dest ths pat stew
dd to set forth explicit design standards for Army belcopers to cxablsh “
‘ualincation requirements, and to provide technical guidance to Nelcopet designers
Im both the industry and within the Army ¢
The first volume ofthe handbook, AMCP 706-201, discuss the characteristics “
and subsystems which must be conskered during preliminary design of helicopter,
‘Additionally, possible design problems encountered during helicopter desig are
scused and pomsible soltion suggested A
'AMCP 706-202 deals with the evolution of the veicle from an approved
preliminary design cotiguration. As a result ofthis phase, the design mst provide
suicient detail to permit construction and qualification ofthe helicopter in com +
Pliance with the approved detail specication aad other teqivenent. Design
oquirements forall vehicle subsjteme alto are included in AMCP 706-202,
This volume, AMCP 706-203, defines the requirements for airworthiness >
‘qualification ofthe helicopter and for demonstration of contact compliance, an alo .
esrbes the test procedures accomplished by the Army. The volumes divided ino
1 ctupter, and is organized as described in Chapter 1, the intedacton to the +
volume
2aiv z‘AMCP 706-203
PREFACE
‘Tis wohume, AMICP 706203, Quatifesion Assuronce, is the final section of =
tweet engnesing handbook, Helkoprer Engineering, in the Engineering Design
‘andtosk srea It was prepared by For Actespace, Ine, Washington, D.C. under
fobeontsct to the Engioering Handbook Office, Duke University. Durham, N.C.
"The Sagincting Design Handbooks fl into two bai categories, hose approved for
oles ant, andthwe clase for sou reatons. The Army Mateit Command
‘oly to eles thse Engineering Desig Handbooks to other DOD activites and thei
‘onto, sid other Goverment agencies in accordance with core Army Regulation
SOS1, ted 9 September 1966 Iw be noted that he sort of these Handbooks
‘a bs sbtined fom the Nelonal Technical laformation Service (NTIS). Procedures for
‘Sepiig thse Handbooks Flo:
kris win AMC, DOD agence, and Goverment agencies ater thar DOD
‘ving ned forte Handbook sould dest ther equest onan fil form to
Commanding Otis
leterkenny Ary Depot
ATIN: ANXLE-ATD
Cambersars, Pennsylvania 17201
by. onteetors and uveitis must forward ther quest to:
‘ational Tesh! Information Service
Department of Commerce
Springeld, Vila 22151
(Requsts for lasiied documents mst be sent, wth appropriate “Needo-Know”
justia, to Leterkemny Army Depot)
srs of the handbook sie enouraged to contact USAAVSCOM St, Louis, Mo
agit Standards and Quaifeston Devon (ANSAV-EFD, with thir recommendations
ind comments concerning the handbook. Comments should be specie and include
‘Reomonended text changes and pipportiag atone. DA For 2028, Recon
Tandnd Changes to Publications (available through normal
Publications eupply chansele) may be used for thie purpose.
Wresy of the coments should be sent to the Comanding
Gensel, AAC, ATTN: AMCRD-TV, Washington, DC 20315,
Resisions to the handbook will be made on an asrequred tals end will be
distrnutd on 8 normal basis through the Leterkenny Army DepotCOOCECEE CC EOE EEE MET CE CIEE OO HEEOC ERE GEBE CEE EEEAMP 706-203
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
AMCP 106-201, Helicopter Engineering, Part One
Preliminary Design, ihe fist volume ofthe Helicopter
“Handbook Series avd siscuses the preliminary design
phase and contract definition procedure, incluing the
roles and applications of weight and performance est
sation; ying quality predictions, and systent safety,
reliability, and maintsinabilty considerations) At the
conclusion ofthe preliminary definition period, «he
copter configuration wll have been selected and its
‘eneral characteristics and capabilites defined in pro-
[urement specifications Data required during contact
definition, in responseto a Request for Proposal (RFP)
‘or a Request for Quotation (RFQ), have been defined
in Chapter 14 of AMOP 706-201,
‘The same disciplines and procedures continue in
‘greater detail throughout design and_ qualification
‘AMCP 706-202, Helicopter Engineering, Part Twa, De-
tail: Design, the second volume, describes the follow-
‘on detail (or engineering development) phase in terms
‘of design requirements, eriteria, and procedures forthe
total cysts and ite cabeyetems. The eyetam and ub
stems are reexamined, refined, and defined as the
design and optimization proces continu. The specif
cation requirements end qualification plans are trans
Jated into hardware hyou', with appropriate investi-
ations, analyses, and exploratory. testing, Detail
‘drawings, reanalysesand qualification testing follow.
This volume, AMCP 706-203, includes the require-
‘ments. and procedures for substantiation ofthe airwor-
‘thiness of the vehicle rough proof of compliance with
contractual designrequirementsiand performance guar-
Airworthiness, as defined in AMCR 70-3, is “a
demonstrated capablty of an aircraft, or airraft sub-
system or componen fo function satisfactorily when
‘sed within the prescribed limits
‘Ts the intent of ths volume to delineate the respon-
“sblitesofboch the rocaring activity and the contrac
tor in the planning ad execution ofthe airworthiness
‘qualification program fora new model helicopter. The
Inlcopte systems to which such program is applica-
ble may be completdy new, or may be the result of
‘major mosification of « previously qualified system.
For simpy, the internal workings ofthe Govern-
rent are not dsoused. Govermmenial raponatiies
sre always related to only che procuring activity.
‘Although dependent limatly upon specie tats
and demonstrations of the complet helicopter system,
Sicworthines_qunlifeason is a continuing. proces
‘whic gine with he ination of stem development
Teeluded ar design eviews, during both theinial sb
system definition phase and the final detail design of
‘Seenbles and intallatons. The construction and ia-
Section of full-scale mock-up by experts is spe
‘ad deg review. Conducted 8 carl inthe program,
5 posible, the mock-up review permis evaluation of
the rlationahip and interaction between all required
‘beystemsin a msnner whic ie imposible when ng
nly two-dimensional layouts and drawings.
Dring the design and intial fabrication phase, prior
to the avalsbilty of components or complete systems
rts analyses re performed to subsatiatsSubsyse
tem cofigaratons and performance. Alo during this
Paviod detailed plane ate prepare forthe tasting of
Components, subsystems, andthe complete helicopter
ss equ to ver compliance wth applicable design
‘nd performance requrenenss The peparauon of
‘hese analyses and plans by the contractor and their
review and approval by dhe procuring atv ate sg-
nificant elements of the srworshines qualieton pro
eam,
(anlieton of = new model helicopter includes
qualification of component, ofsubsystems, and ally
‘fthecompete hiopterrytem. Rach of thse oss
Is deseibed in the chapters which flow. Also included
isa cineanson of Govemmentl texting, which com
usted to confirm that system performance eomplics
vith contract quirements, This testing ncdes that
{eqired to obtain the data neoessary for verifying safe
Inlicopter operation for fllowon Governmental t=
ing and forthe preparation of operational and service
manual forthe sytem. Following completion ofthe
Dbalcopter qualication and preparation by the procur
‘ng activity of th Airworthiness Qualification Subta
tation Report, Governmental testing conics, in the
form of Service Tet, to inte operational suitability
ulAMP 706-203
snd to determine 1 what ogee the helicopter meets
the characteristics stated inthe requirement document
Hlowever, discussion ofthese efforts beyond arworthi-
‘ness qualification is not within the seope of hie and
book
“Throughovt this volume, the mandatory qualicn
toa requirements have bee identified with the coo-
‘ractallangoage which makes we of the imperative
sword “shall” To assist nthe use of this document in
the planning of a qualification program, the word
“shall” has been alized i thestatement of each suc
sequicement
Since the qualification requirements for individual
programs may vary fom the level of detail describ
In ths volume, the procuring activity will pei its
‘Reset for Proposl the extent to which these roi:
iments are applicable to the qualieation of given
hsiopter. Deviations fom this handbook nt epeci-
cally included in the REP will be considered when
!deguately ubtantited inthe contractors espanse
the REP. This handbook wil not be incorporated in a
contact by reference in whole arin part. Homer, the
Jnmdtook may be farses to contractors ae base for
‘stablishng contrac requirement tobe cluded inthe
‘Airworthiness Qulifestion Speciation (Chapter 2)AMP 706-203
CHAPTER 2
AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
2:1 INTRODUCTION
‘The Coordinated Test Program (CTP) i the pri-
mary development pinning document used to des
ibe the formal, comprehensive program for tes-
ing. The CTP is roguived by AR 70-10 for all e-
search and development projects entering engineer-
ing development, The CTP for helicopters normally
ie prepared by the Anny Project Manager, and has
the folowing objective:
1. Toservessa munagement ton tinsure that he
nccesiy elements of text program are addresied
2-To insure that aequat coordination i effected
among the agencies which request dat
2. To insure that adequate testing i planned for
riving a ype clasifetion and a production decision
4 To provide justfaton forthe numberof pot
types to be used daring testing
‘TheCTP also mus provide the justification fr com-
bining tess, for condeting them concurrently, ofr,
climinating them in an effort to avoid duplicate and
‘amecesary testing
Helicopters and slind equipment are developed um
er a specific analtal proces to substantiate that
they are airworthy. The total of all elements in this
‘nage proces isthe Airworthiness Qua ton
rogram (AQP). ‘The program is deserbed filly in
the CTP and ison clenent of the Request for Proposal
(RFP) o Request for Quotation (RFQ). The AQP peo-
‘ides general guidance on enginering analyse, formal
inspetions, design reviews, safety asessmenis, com
‘eacor demonstrations, ad all conractar and Gover
‘ental qualification tas esetal to dafaing and in
Plementing the procirement of any major Army air
Sem and/or sled guipment. This general informa
‘Son then will povide the basis forthe Airworthiness
(Qualfestion Speiftion (AQS), which is weten by
the contactor Inert in the AQS ithe dissemina-
tion of data nesetsny to demonstrate roa of eompl
ance with thesystem eserption or deta specication.
‘The AQSs designed to isure that the necessary ifor-
tation obtained to permit the issance ofthe Salty
lof Fight Reeies and/or Interim Statemeats of t=
‘worthines Quaifeaion required during enginering
evelopment Te also pennts the issuance ofa Sta=
‘ent of Airworthines Qoliston, and Army publ
‘ation ofan Airworthiness Qualification Substantation
Repor, upon the compleson ofthe program. Last,
the AQS wil ahere to the pales, bjestvs, defn
tions, nd procedures spect in
TAR 70-10, Testand Bvalaton During Research
and Development of Materiel
2, AMCR 70:32, deronautoal Design Standards
ADS) for US. Army” Airraft Systems ond
Sibostoms
3. AMCR 70-33, Airworthiness: Qualification of
US. Army dircaf Stems and Subsystems
The types of tats which comprise the CTP, as well
sas thetest agency, est hardware and test objectives for
{feomplet opie system a alegupmety we
summarized in Tables 2-1 and2-2. These tests normally
Should be conducted in the sequence shown in the ta-
bes, especially where text results are equted prior to
further testingand in those uations where extreme
climatic conditions wil be encountered. Concurrent
fad integrated text phasing willbe ured when justified
by fund and ine linitatons.
2:2 AIRWORTHINESS
QUALIFICATION SPECIFICATION
(QS)
(GENERAL,
As noted inthe previous paragraph he contractor's
sirworthines qualification test plan ithe ke element
in the overall coordinated plan for development of new
heicopters,
Fr each baicopter system subject to qualifston or
requaliation tecause of major modification,
‘qualication speciation wil be prepared to establish
a
22a‘AMCP 706-203
those enginerng tots or analyes which ae ssn
to the arworthinessubtanation ofthe yee. This
‘work is vided into those testo be performed ander
‘a eagncringdavlopment contract, oF any oer ap-
propriate procurement action such esa product im
22.2 AIRWORTHINESS QUALIFICATION
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
‘The Airworthiness Qualification Spcication will
be prepara bythe rime system contactor in responce
TABLE 24, SUMMARY OF CTP TEST REQUIREMENTS—HELICOPTER SYSTEM
cosas a
Pr ee
oe See | Me mia um neo
a EE |S TE eno, ures
Se pees a
cn ROVE RELNDaRY SreRATNAL EDT
scores | 2 mereaen caerhare eden
nacrnaes | Ea | pone | ENG cates Heke ewernenes
ote Ta hare ee ere
on ee
a
ee
aor aineresins or Tie adnol NT ash NT
seers [CE | meager
‘com (TECOWTEST, er ‘DETERMINATION OF COMPONENT SERVICE LIFE AND QUICK CRANGE KITS
Be ite
—
‘TABLE 2.2 SUMMARY OF CTP TEST REQUIREMENTS—ALLIED EQUIPMENT
TEER TOC IE TE WENT SALCTNL COIN,
FLEermea amps frre
TeoTi | DevEmmaTionte Rawk 6 APETY NPATION
[umtrcano rests
eo
EVDTRATON OF PERFORM ABT COMTRRGT
ETE oF Hu FEoRNICS REOURENENTS
TART GEVELOMENT a ARTA
aALrearon tests,
Tac
Sevenaenr
igeerhuce
sts mown | ores
hurt Ne oe ureter
cvoneeane
a8
wares
Sem an pane
(aati air tiem
TES A FLT GHEACTERTIE
DEyEAMIMIN oF THE OEREE TS The TESTS TH
(arr | amerenetes or Te Wegunetens cocwet
2AMCP 706-203
to the requirements tablished bythe procuring 2c-
‘ivy ia the REP. Eleents ofthe AQS include:
1. System Safty
2 Design Revie and Release of Drawings
3. Mockeups
4, Procurement and Process Specifications
5, Component Ts
6. Sytem Survers
17. Formal Conttor Demonstrations.
‘These elements are deserted in the paragraphs
which fallow
2.2.2.1 System Safety
‘Aspartof the Airworthiness Qualification Spica
tion the contractor wil tablish the means by which
the results ofthe Syszm Safety rogram (SSP) ae to
be eplid inthe airorthines qualiieation of the
ton. The provisions and requirements of the System
Safty Program Pin SSPP) ae stated in par. 3-2. This
program produces data and information leading 0&8
Furies that the opium degtee of hazard elimina-
ton or control has ten stained in the design of the
sistem. The contacor wil nclae\two areas which
‘linately combine 9 form the bass forthe Sytem.
Safety portion of sivorthiness qualification: (1) i
term fal safety statements and (2) system species
Son compliance. In addition, the contactor wil n=
fore that all components tei, system surveys, and
{ormal demonstrations are planned tnd Soedacted i
clone coordination withthe System Safety Program,
Hazard analyse wll bean integral nd een factor
‘nal such ests and demonstrations to insure that these
‘ctvtes are conde’ with minimum ak
22.2.2 Desigy Reviews and Release of
Drawings
Design reviews wil be conducted on an as-equired
basi, This portion ofthe AQS wil one the contac:
tor procedures for -onductng such reviews. Speiic
‘equrements ae not presented in his volume because
‘ach contractor uray has his own review procedures
nd drawing appro proces. Is not considered eae
‘ble to ry to standardive these areas. Partition in
the design reviews dos ot limit oF rect tha le
rent ofthe proarng setivity fom the responsibility
tt nsuring that the drawings conform tthe requ
‘ments of MIL-D-T010 through normal contract chan-
mel
Design review of deal drawings is required for
‘ach subsystem Base reason forthe ineuson ofthese
reviews inthe qualifation program of hsioptrs are
ines as fellows
1. To insure tht there are no obvious exists
with design tera
2. To ingare that there reno obvious design pit
falls dicpline sacha fey, ellabilty, and mao
‘ainably
5. To maintain postive record ofthe conigurs:
tion which i being propored for analysand testing
4 To establish bas or updating and ident
pasts which pas o all the qolfaton tes,
5. To provides foundation fran aust tal of
worthiness substantiating ations
2223
“The specications forthe mock-ups required by the
[RFP wil be inclaed in the AQS. See Chapter 5 fora
etled deus of mock-ups.
Moekups
2.2.2.4 Procurement and Process
‘Speciications|
In order forthe procuring stv to manta cop
ance over the detail configurations for which srwor
thine ubstantation ie dese, review ofcertainpet-
feat drawings and approval of procurement
fpecicaons of contractorfurished equipment
(CFE) components are een. To insure adequate
‘rucuralitepty, material and proces spesifentions
leo mst be subjected to the approval he procuring
ety
‘This section of the AQS should list those procure-
ment and process specifications which most be sub-
Jest to approval By the procuring activi.
“Type examples ofthe key procurement snd pec.
ssseaications (rawings defined in MIL-D-1000 t0
be submited are
1. Specification contrat
2. Soure control
2. Interface control
4 Instalaton contro
5. Installon
6 Contra.
Spesfeton control drawings or source conta
rawings which constitute conracior procurement
peciletions shouldbe included automaticaly fo the
'AQS. Details of procurement and proas specication
requirements are described in Chapter 6
23‘AMC? 706-203,
2.2.2.5 Component Tests
‘The objectives of component testing are to make a
preliminary determination whether the reliably re
‘quirements for component life will be met by the
Tardware under tet and to ingure adequate integrity
for sein higher level assemblies inground and fight
tests, This section of the AQS wil dtine complete est
requirement
2225.1 Prequalification Bench Tests
Prequalification bunch tests are not clisied at
“must pas ess, The primary objective of prequal
ution testing 10 uncover any defect or design de
‘ieney and to detect any fatigu-vitialcompaeat oF
pare Tn addition, the program wil be used for the
‘incorporation and evaluation of "ines" and in gener,
1o refine the component or subsjiem design. The
preguaiiation test tne and severity wil be specifi
and funded as part ofthe contract,
22252 Qualification Tests
The objective ofthe gualicaton est it demon
stent formally that the prequalication testing has de
{ectad any delet or flgutimited prt athe com-
ponent or subajtem. Exablishment of int time
{etwoen veriauls (THO) willbe made by the procur-
{ng sty atthe completion ofthe testing otned in
pir. 2-22.5.1 and revised periodically depending on
Serve or adaional bench test experienc. The length
fand severity ofthe quaieaton tests wll be specified
by the procuring astiity and funded as part of the
2.2.25.3 Tiedown Tests
The total propulsion system—incuding all goa
‘boxe, enginG) shftng, rotor systems brakes, clutch
fs, aconsores, and controls—willbe installed on the
{round lest vehicles and subjenal to qulifcation tt
ing in accordance wit atest procedure approved by
the procuring aciity. The Best test period wl be the
preliminary Right approval test (PPA) and must be
‘Completed stsatoly before fst Might. The procur-
fing activity wll determine satsactory completion of
the test. Retesting may be required, depending on the
ature and severity ofthe flores.
2.2.2.5.4 — Rolibilty Bonch Tests
Additional bench sting wl be fequee by the pro-
curing activity to enhance the pregualifction stats of
selected components or subsystems. The test schedule
Should be ima to that sein pa. 22.2.5. uliing
24
as much ofthe orginal hardware as possible. Duration
‘ofthe est wil be determined by the procuring activi.
22.255 Component and Subsystem
Inspections
‘Asa minimom, formal military qualification sts of
components and subeystems Wl inch:
1. Engines,
2. Main transmissions
3. Main rotor and tail oor subsystems inloing
io and Bide |
4 Propller and propeller pasboses
‘Tall rotoe gearboxes
Torermediae gearboxes
Flight controls
Poel systems
5
6
2
5
9. Landing gsr
0. Elect
‘These tess wl be followed bya disassembly inspection
accomplished in he presence of representatives of the
‘Contactor, the procuring activity, andthe Army Com:
‘modity Commands if applicable. The inspections will
‘be performed to determine ifthe components and sab-
‘stems have sucessfully posed the quliaton test
‘efned inthe AQS.
The inspection of mechanical and hydromeskanca
components is divided ita two phases, The fis in
voles inspection af all parts immediatly afer dss
sembly the second inspection invalves a review of the
‘sults ofthe ital ispection. Data should be made
svalbl othe inspection tem fr both phase.
‘Al mechanical and hydromechanial components
sod assembles willbe subjected toa complete anal
cal isssembly and inspection. Inspection techniques
tay inlad, but ot be Hrd fr (1) visual, @)
‘mensional, (3) magnetic partie, () fluorescent pene-
tant, (5) Keay, and (6) las
‘Photographic coverage of ll items of significance is
required during inspections for ltr ubization ithe
qualifiestion text report
22.256 Electrical and Electronic
‘Components
ns general ls sophisticated inspections will be con
{dacted on elas nd eletrnie components st the
[end of component testing than those speifed for me-
hanical and hydeemechanial components in the
previous paragraphs. Appropriate inspection reports
Wil be prepared. A desertion of component te
quirements is sven in Chapter 7.-AMCP 706-203,
22.2.6 System Surveys
System surveys incade all tests designed to deter.
sine system characteristics and demonstrate satisfic-
tory sytem operation within the normal Might en
elope as well 38 10 determine conformance with
sirrame unit design requirements. In determining 398-
fem characterise, acount wil be taken ofthe inti
ence ofall sabsystems, ned and movable, and expected
operating envionment. The requivemeats of pat. 2-
227 alo will apply 1 the system surveys specifi
here
‘System surveys should include, but not be ited to
1. Fight Load Survey. Flight lads wil be ob
tained throughout the fight envelope fr allenic
‘components Sufficient data wll be abisined to allow 2
Preliminary estimate of fatigue lives and to determine
‘resonant frequeniesof eral components are tuned
fo the fequencies ofthe primary exiting frees (ee
par. 82)
2, Engine Vibratory Survey. Flight and ground
vibratory surveys willbe conducted to verify that en-
{ne vibrations donot exceed the allowable vibratory
limit specified inthe engine model specification (Gee
par 63)
5. Propulsion System Temperature Survey. Fight
and ground temperature surveys willbe conducted 19
erly that the engin), engine accessors, engine
Avid. siframe stractre transmission system. ga
bones, Ret exchangers et, donot exceed their allow
able temperature limit (ee par 8).
4. Engine Air Induction System Survey. Flight
snd ground engine inkt surveys wil be conducted 0
‘verify proper inlet presure recovery and distortion pat
ters (Ge pa. 8-5),
5. Engine Eshaus Survey. Fight and ground en-
ine exhast subsjstem surveys wll be conducted to
‘lute operation an performance (pressure survey)
fd tr olin petri pal ex
6. Total System Vibratory Survey. Those tts are
required to demonstate compliner with vibrator)
comfort requirements and to demonstrate thatthe bel
copter i fre from exesive wbraons, or roughoess
sffectng ts streturalinterity ots capably to per-
orm its mision. Vibratory measurement instrumenta-
tion will be installed at the requied locations. Quan-
titative data shouldbe collected during wnaoslertad
tnd aeeerte fight over the fall ange ofthe Might
tmvlope and of allonable rotor speeds (ee pa. 7).
7. Crew Envieonmentl Survey. A survey shold
bv performed to demonsrate compliance with erew
environmental requirements under all peed oper:
ing conditions and modes (ee par 8).
8. Infrared (IR) Radiation and Countermeasare
System Suriey. An IR radiation and countermeasure
system survey should be performed, if applicable, to
demonstrat that the TR sigaatae bas ben reduced to
acceptable levels The survey wil inlude documents-
tion ofall trade-off made in miniminng the signature
(ex par 892),
9. Radar Reflectivity Survey. A surey should be
pesformed to demonsrae that thera elecviy
inimal and absorption is maximum. The survey wll
include a detailed report of techniques to minimize
radar reflectivity (8 par 8.93).
10, Lightning Protection Survey. A survey wil be
performed to establish a high degree of confidence that
{he helicopter sjstem can survive lighining strike AS
‘minimum, the survey wll demonstrate thatthe Fs!
‘stem meets Faderal Aviation Administeation AC20-
53, Further, the bonding. concepts of MIL-B.SO87
shouldbe demonstrated as capable of surviving ight-
ning strikes Gee par. 884,
11. Acoustical Survey. An acoustic survey will
be performed, if applicable, wo demonstrate thatthe
scoutical signature meets the appropiate require:
‘ments. Thi survey wil be performed under all pe
Fit operating conditions and modes (ee par. 8.6,
22.2.7 Formal Contractor Demonstrations
‘This portion of the airworthiness qualifeaion
specication will contin the specific Army req
‘ments for the formal demonstration ofthe heiooptr to
show its eayabilty to comply with requirements of the
Inlicopter detail speciation
‘The purpose of the formal contactor demonstra:
1. To demonstrate thatthe helicopter can be op
crated safely by Army pilotsdrng the prosring ==
‘iiy’s test program tits consent with the con-
tract design limits without excessive malfunctions,
flues, of other unetsatory conditions
2. To demonstrate those specification require:
‘ments which wil ot be substantieted during the pro
ring activity test program. These contractor demon
Ssrations are usally "pas tests of @ specie
‘esgn requirement.
3. Toobtain quantitative information on safe ight
limits for operation by Army gilts
2s‘AMP 706.203,
4. To verify that the hellcoper has completed con-
tractor tt and is ready for delivery tothe procuring
stivity for Governmental test
222.71 Demonstration Sites
‘Thedemonsration normally is conducted atthe con
tractors ght test fact other ght test tts
may be used with prior Governmental approval. Tests
involving the earring and release of guided misses,
txposves, and armament should be performed at &
Toston specified by the procuring activi.
2.2.2.7.2 Helicopter Configuration for
Demonstrations |
Hlcopers uss for the performance of formal
demonstrations shoul be dential, within production
tolerance, to hecoptere which are to be delivered or
have boon delivered for Governmental tests or opers:
‘donl use. For thote demonstrations in which engine
power isa crite parameter, calibrated engines will Be
wtlized.
2.22.7. Contractor Plt Approval
For formal demonstrations, al contractor test plots
wil te approved, by name, bythe procuring att
Contactors should ineruct demonstration pills
thoroughly cocering the design, serodynamis and
struciral features, and/or oer umusil characterise
tis of the demonstration helicopters.
2.2.2.7.4 —Hellopter Fight Approval
Demonstration belcopters should not be operated
by contractor lots without Safety-of Fight Release
lniued By the procuring activity.
2227.5 Test Conference
Pio othe development of detail test plans forthe
formal demonstration program, oe of more test la
ring conferences shoals be bel Between the contractor
fnd the procarng activity to iasure that the require:
‘ents ofthe formal demonstration programs ae us
‘erstoed and to expedite the conduc he program by
‘esoling any questions or ambiguities that may exit
‘Aasivonal test conferences may beheld as required
2.2.2.7.8 Speci Demonstration
Fequiorents
Demonstration requirements wil be developed dr
ing contact defnitions, and generally Wil include the
falling
1. Strctral Demonstration. Structural demon
stration shoold coat of quantitative Hight test mex
26
surements ofall combinations of gross weight confgu-
ration, center of gravity (CO), albtude sped, load
fete, and eoatrl mations required to demonstrate
complince with the helicopter detail speciation
‘Sructural requirement (4c pa. 92)
2. Engine/Aieframe Compatiility Test. Both
round and ight tes of engin/airrame competi-
Iryare conducted to verify engine, engine contol dive
tenn, and rotor subaystem dynamic matching (ot
‘Sonal stability) characterises (ee par. 93.2)
3, Lubrication Subsjstom Demonstration. A ue
‘rcationsobeystem demonstration i conducted to de-
‘ermine ithe engine ol system(s) and transmission ot
system() operate sntifactors, maintain the required
til pressure, and are fe from excessive ol decharge
1 the Brenthers and to demonstrate the adaquacy of
{he ol cooling and bypass sytem. The ol cooling test
may be condicte during the engine temperature su
vey (ee par. 9.34.
44 Fue Subeystem Demonstration. A ful sobsys-
tem demonstration ss conducted to determine the
capacity of the fl tank() of the heliopter and
Amount of unusable fil, fe! vent system adequsey,
{he operational characteristics of he fel supply system
‘under varios toost pump file conditions, the em
perature suey limits of fe system equipment, andthe
fel system operational cpabitis under scaal se
‘ioe conditions In adition, the satisfactory operation
ofthe fue supply under extreme operating conditions
‘hoald be demonstrsted (ee par. 9-342).
5. Dynamic Instability Demonstration, The con-
tractor will demonstrate thatthe halcopter is fiee of
‘ochanial inability aall operating conditions, the
nti range of gros weights, and throughout the ex
treme temperate range (spar. 9).
6. Flying Quality Demonsiration. The yng qual
ity demonstration will consis of quantitative ight ts.
reaturements demonstrating compliance with the r=
suiremens of the handing quality speciation. This
omplance wil be demonseted throughout the fal
Aight envelope in both powered and astoruaive ight,
‘nd should include demonstration of«heightvelosty
curve (se pa. 95.3,
17. Eletial Demonstration, The contractor wil
demonstrat the performanceaf the complete eetial
system. The demonstrtion, consisting of ground and
Aight tests, wl adequate to determine the capability
ofthe system to perform the factions required bythe
Spplicable specications (separ 9.6)
{ Avionie Demonstration, The contractor ail
demonstrate the performance of the eomplee avioic
Insalaion The demonstration, consisting of roundAMP 706-203
$70 203
and igh tet, should verify the eapeiity ofthe sys
tem to perform the funtion dictated bythe apace
specifications Gee pr. 9-7)
9, Bectromagnete Compatibility EMC) Demon-
stration. The contacto: wll demonsirate thatthe ar
fous subsytems funston propery in any posse cle
‘eomagetic envionment that can be generated by
operation of onboard equipment. The contractor also
il demonstrate dat 9 single subst operates as
1 pousible source of cssomagnetc energy that can
fause other onboard wuipment to malfunction jet
pa. 976).
To, Hydraulic Subeystem Demonstration. The
contractor will demorstate the performance of the
complete Aydraue subystem. The dasonstaton,
consisting of ground and fight test, should besa.
‘lent to determine the espabiity of the subsystem to
perform adequately thefunctons required bythe ppl
ble specifications (cepa. 9.8.2)
1. Furnishing and. Equipment Demonstration’
All specifi equipmert, actualy istaled in, spe
‘fieally required fo, he demonstration hliopter wl
‘bedemonstrated satisfactorily onthe ground and/or in
Aight, as applicable (par 9-10.
12. Armament Demonstration, The contractor
will demonstrate the prtormance ofthe complete r=
‘mameat sytem. The demonstration, consisting of
‘round and Might tes, will be adequate to determine
the capability of the stem ro peor the funesions
equred by she spplicn squiiatione. Suet
tess wil be perm to prove the structural integ-
rity and functional perormance of all armament sub
systems (te pa. 9-13,
13. External Store Demonstration. The contractor
should define and demonstrates external store sepa
tation envelope forall exeraal stores roqired fo be
Carved by the hlcope- Separation envelopes will be
demonstrated for both powered and autorottive Right
(ace par 9-13)
TEST SEQUENCING
‘This handbook does not atempt to replat the se
quence of ther the senses or tests eset to at
‘worthiness qualification anew model helicopter, The
setedling of thes activites is args aMuneton of the
extent to which the eleoper design ineludes ew or
novel eatares, the avait af eUlpment, exons
considerations and delvery constant,
‘An sirvorthines qulifeation program includes
tests conducted by bth che contractor an the peo
ing activity. With the ception of Army Preliminary
valuations (APE), the testing performed by the pro-
curing activity follows the contractor's quafcation
{nd demonstration rogram. Inf, service testing, at
‘he name implies, includes tests performed with opera.
tional helicopters. Therefore, this test phase norally
wil continue pas the publication ofthe Airworthiness
Qualeation Substntaon Report (AQSR) by the
procuring adv,
nthe preparation othe AQS, the contractor should
propos schedule which will result in a ogc e-
‘quence of the required analysis and testers inorder
‘minimize the risks involved inthe qualifstionpeo-
sam, During formal contract negotiations the impact
of exnomic constraints and designated date for cam
Pletion of qualication on this echedule can be ade
Ares
‘A qualification program subject to minimum risk
‘would require that all components be well developed
roc to commencement of ubytem tering, ha s+
‘ystems be qualified indvidelly prior fo total hele
copter system testing, and that all operational cond
fons for the helicopter be catfully tested om the
round prior to fist Might. Alb, each othe test phases
‘woul be preceded by sfiient analyses to ase that
CUMULATIVE HOURS (14 CUMULATIVE MONTHS) OF fe
OPERATION -
TABLE 3, HAZARD ELIMINATION/CONTROL RESOURCES
(CODE CALCULATED DOLLAR EQUIVALENCE*
P| LESS THAN $1000 REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE/
CONTROL THIS HAZARD
(| 81000 - 10,000 REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE /CONTROL, 2
THIS HAZARD,
R__ | 810,000 - 100,000 REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE / a
CONTROL THIS HAZARD
| OVER $100,000 REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE/ =
CONTROL THIS HAZARD 2
“CALGULATED DOLLAR VALUE OF ALL RESOURDES [REVISION OF POL :
[Gr PROCEDURES, MANGER, DOLLARS, TECHNOLOGY, FACILITIES
MAiEHALS, AND SCHEDULE] REOUIFED TO EITHER ELIMINATE OR CON:
{ROL THE HAZARD OF INTEREST.
aAMcP 706-203
ce
nays summary which dociments the following:
1, A brief description af the fonction being
analyzed
2. The hazard involved lassie tothe appropri
Me level as specifed Bt MILSTD-882
5. statement eiocering the hazard efets
4A recommended corrective setion
S.A remarks coumn noting the sats and/or
szcomplshmen of the corrective actions.
‘The hazard analysis based on an operational se
quence chart in which specie tasks are defined end
their interrlatonships shown. This analysis also ean
‘bffoatve when used oases the safety poste and
TABLE 34, HAZARD TOTEM POLE
ae TON
wear | ox lo lo | mumper or
jstictiee| BE | 82 [BE | Hucorte
rao) 85 | 83 [a | aes
ee
the herd oem poe at ann ate Soba
ftompleunach arc freorsiaton (UP wtb morse
Foran were cual when pens sen Eo
‘Stony thn potty abs fly seuss Both we
Seperated aro on
to docament corrective scion for operations tht are
planned divergences from the normal operational
‘mode. This technique requires the aft analy tobe
amir with the detailed Tunetionl systems of he
Itcopter.
32.2.2 Fault Tree Analysis
‘The purpose of fut tee analysis to establish the
probity ofeccurtence of thehazard, Fat rea
$s primarily quantatve and ule detalles com
ponent flue probable o ealvlate overall proba
bility of the undesired event (Refs. 1, 2, and 3),
ooweve, ils can beused qualitatively odentify the
ondions which may need further acide prevention
Work In this appliation ata sey too, the decision
£510 whether remedial action freq is based upon
‘comparison ofthe output probabilities fo the safety
level deemed acceptable The fault ter anal it @
Statistical hazaré-onentod model. At the apen of the
‘tee, the undesired event i identified. Working from
this apex a ee ofall events which contribute to ehe
Inazardous condition is constructed. Each event that
‘ay eae such a condition i asgned toa faire rate
Sodan "Uadeected Fault Time’ which the duration
Of the time a falt condition exists undetected in a
System, Fllre rte neal ao bem constant vale bat
‘ares with the atvty being perform ot the sess
levels encountered. For example an engines abst 0
‘more furs at raximim power than stile
1 specifi fal is repreentd onthe Fault Tes a8 an
“ORgate™. When al input events must take place
simultaneously before the output event wil acu this
's tepreseted on the Fault Tree aban "AND ign
322.3 Failure Mode and Hazardous Effect
Analysis (FMHEA)
‘The purpete of FMHEA i to avid costly modifica
ions. This is accomplished by detecting design and
operational deficiencies in early design and testing
hats, which assures «high lvl of safety before the
Initio of quantity produsion, An editionl oe
te isthe determination ofthe citi fale modes
which have a serous effect on the svc con
pletion of wmision and on the safety ofthe erew The
[nays cones of an independent cra review of
‘he system, coupled with a systema examination of
allconoavable fale, and an evaluation of the fees
ofthese files on the mision capability of the system
‘The systam i decribed ina factional block di
tram showing the erties! fenedons which constite
fhe sytem. A *critcl function” is one th must be
38AwcP 706-203,
ance 7068
performed i the system i to operat. In this diagram,
the Blocks are connected to each other by lines which
preset the “input” and “outps” of each Fnction
‘Avilure is now defined 36 breakin an output ine.
‘each output nes in tar systematically ext ther
lone or nextel combination with ether fails all
‘posible fimetonal failures in the system wll be cow
‘re. ach vita nein i reviewed fr flare pbs
ly bated upon two question. The frst i how ean
this assumed functional flare actually occur, Le,
what pieces of hardware would have 1 fll ist 0
eau in this functional fire! Te nt necessary for
the anaye to ident all posible ardware ares, if
Ine canon identify one orto, he can establish some
probability of system alure. Secondly, how can this
Faure mode be removed, ie, must thisbe designed his
way?
323. SAFETY TESTS
Salty tess sal be integrate into propria st
plans. Partin! verifeton of safety characteristics or
Drooedlres may be demonstrated by Iaboratory tess,
emctional mock-ups or model simulation, when ap-
proved by the procuring activity. The dealed test
Blas forall teste hall be reviewed to insure tht:
1. Safety is demonstrated adequately
310
2. The testing wil be cari out in safe manner
5. All adtonal hazards introduced by testing
procedures, inramentation, est hardware, are
ropertyiatied and minimized.
324 DATA
Safty data requirements during the development
pase wl incorporate int those fom oher Phas
ofthe system lie eye and sped in the Contract
Data Requirement. Lise (DD Form 1423). System
safety data acquisition and acceptance wil be in ae+
‘ondance with MIL-STD 382.
REFERENCES
1.3, Feute and I. Tracy, Fault Troe for Safe,
1D6-S713, The Bosing Co. Jaouary 1966
2. Feute and T. A. Waldeck, The Application
Of Fouls Tree Anais to Dynamie Systems
‘The Boving Co, presented at the System
Safty Syraposium, Seattle, Wash, June 1968
3, JLB, Peller, Foul Tree Analysis as 2 Tool for
Systm Safety Engineering, |Report
X$-1002/319, North American Aviston?
‘Autoneties, Anaheim, California, January
1968,-AMCP 706-203,
CHAPTER 4
DATA AND DOCUMENTATION PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS
4-1 INTRODUCTION
“This chapter teases the data and documentation
requirements, fom thebesinning of engineering devel
‘opmetlanil allnecesury elements and characteristics
(ofthe configuration ad heliopter system have boon
‘efine, investigated, and quae for production. The
ata discuss subsoquntly ae intended tobe a com-
posite i of data whict coal be made avaiable tothe
Government by th ertactor. The data requirements
for a specifi program shouldbe tallored within this
Hine. Subsequent chaps discuss the need, se, and
required content of specifi tems of da.
‘DD Form 1423 isthe only contract! instrument
forthe purchase of data nd documentation. Therefore,
data needs will be converted from thot Histed herein
{nto the items on the authorized data lst, TD3, and
thon entered on DD Form 1423. The ned foreach ites
‘ust have dhrough justification for is gens. Data
ray be informative oly, o for review, approval
ther action. When drawings are required, the appro-
priate sections of MIL-D-1000 will apply. The DOD
Index of Data Item Descriptions TD-3, provides wage
_idelines and referents for submit af dat.
"The contractor sal provide the procuring activity
(Gotha extent specifiy DD Form 1423) with various
typesof data—sach atest plans testrepors etic
analyses, specification drawings andthe reports—
‘uring the helcopte system development. These data
Serve several functions, including configuration control
‘snd documentation of dasign and test data. Data are
provided at sraticnilestones during the qualia.
Hon program, eossat with the information sytem
‘ofthe procuring activi, An “audit trail” exabliched
‘0 tha each milstoneof system development may be
‘monitored throughout the development procs. Dats
inputs shouldbe sufisent to allow the procuring 3o-
tity to asses chilvement of design requirements and
to determine problem areas reqiring modification.
42 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
Government spaitcation, standards, and
scronautial standard draings applicable to Army
Tallopte developments willbe in accordance with
thos ted in USAAVSCOM Pamper” No.
7041, the approved Lar af Miltary Speifeotins
‘Standards and Aeronautical Standart Drawings. The
documents governing requirements inthis handbook
vl be thos ses nfs a the ime of formal sol.
tation of propos
"The contractor wil we the specifications and stand
ards i the order of precaence established by MIL-
SSTD-163. This Standard prescribes the eriteria which
‘gover and control the selon of materia and pars
‘when eich tslection criteria have not been specie.
Soci document, when ltd in USAAVSCOM Pam
‘hlet No 70:1, maybe wed without firher approval
However, ia some applications, slction of a specica-
‘on or standard in ths order of precedence mayest
in “overdesign”, with unnecessarily increased costs ot
8 degradation of performance of the taal system. Tn
these cases, a ew oF inproved specification or stand:
fr oramanufactorer' specication requied 2
the opinion ofthe contactor, the optimum specifica
tion or standard fra specifi appliction nt listed,
fan alerate should be Submited to the procuring c-
vty for the required approval, before ts.
Sestifaton for wing the alternate spcifction or
standard, with supporting evidence ofits suitability,
lb smite with aquest fr spproval. Contac-
{ore should sami uch requests for spproval when use
ofthe sesifiation or standard is being contemplated
In order to aveid potential delays inthe quaietion
progres.
Contactor documents shalnot be changed without
prior consent ofthe approving authori. Approval of
ontractor documents igen on am individual con-
tract basis tthe contractor’ responsiblity (0 =>
‘quest and obtain approval for coined use of such
Socumens
“4‘AcP 706-203
In addition, stator operation of equipment pro-
‘ured under any specification or standard isthe espon-
"Silty ofthe contractor. The wie of such speatications
‘or standards, whether sted or approved by the rocat-
ing stivity, i not an automatic aceptance of the fin-
‘shed proctor it acceptability forthe ual helicopter
system. Acceptance of proof of compliance shal be
‘sccomplshe in accordance withthe procedures ofthe
Sppraved AQS.
Copies of Government Spesifatons, Siandaeds,
snd acronatial standard drawings referenced in his
‘handbook may be obtained by the procedure species
fn USAAVSCOM Pamphlet No, 70-
4-3 DATA REQUIREMENTS
Data and documentation shall be submited in a
cordance with the reuiements of DD Form 143,
Potential ata requirements are summarized in Ta-
be 41 (page 416).
44 PROGRAM PLANS:
“The helicopter tet and demonstration plas include:
1, Airworthiness Qulifeation Speciation, pars
24 and 22
2 Electromagnetic Compasility Control Plan,
par. 91
3. System Safety Program Pli, par. 32
4 Reiablty Plan, par 10-1
5. Mainsinablty Plan, par. 1-22
6 Human Factors Engineering Plan, MILH-
46855
7. Weigh and Belance Control and Management
Program Pla, to meet the requirements of MIL-W-
23140
‘The conractor shall mintin and periodically up-
date the preceding plas to reflect changes or expan
fons and to refest configuration changes ofthe hai-
Copter system and its subsystems. Revied and
‘ditional pages shal be farished as required bythe
Contract data package.
45 DESIGN REVIEWS
Design reviews provide technical program contol
‘throughout the design phase. They allow for timely
‘pplication of experience gained on previous programs,
nd result i Savings of oth tie and money when
pe
changes are introduced before fabrication has pro
‘resed toa significant stage.
‘A design review af the schematic drawings for ea
soteysiem is required to insure that the conceptual
design mets the specification requirements and that
‘unsafe conditions or unreaeonsble maintainable
tures are not inherent in the subsjtem designs.
Design reviews wll be conducted by the procuring
stig as required 0 as to adhere to the contactor’
shade
45.1 DESIGN DRAWING REVIEWS
tem is required to:
1. sue that there ate no obvious confi with
esign itera
2: Insure that there reno obvious design defen
ies in disciplines suchas system safety, maintanab
iy, and reliability
3. Maintain a postive ecod ofthe configuration
which is beng recommended for analysis and test
4. Esiablsh a basis for upating and ideniying
‘components which fail he qualification tests
'. Provide foundation of documentation for an
ai al ofall sirworthinessubetantiting ston.
Procaring sctvty participation in design review
doesnot relieve the contractor fom the resposibilty
of insuring thatthe drawings conform tothe require
‘ments of MIL-D-1000, before thet Final acceptance
45.2 _ DATA FOR DESIGN REVIEWS
‘The contractor shal prepare, assemble, and provide
approprine data packages forthe design reviews sched
Ud in the AQS. The packages will define areas tobe
‘reviewed and wil include an agenda coordinated with
{he procuring activity pio tothe review. Data shall be
provided from which the procuring activity ma assess
the compliance of the design with the contracts r=
_uirement, the adequacy ofthe design, andthe prog
‘ess made inthe configuration definition and quali-
‘ation program defined by the AQS. In addition, &
Summary shall include the stats and results of anal
Yes and tests and system safety, eit, and main-
tainabilty programe, and conelusions dea, sats of
procurement and proces specications. schematics
land drawings (Consolidated Drawing List, pat. 47
15 and curent predictions compared with conta
tual weight and mission performance. Problem areas
nd remedial eto most be highlghed, and support
ing deal data made avalble
9.
)AMCP 706-203
46 MOcK.UPS
Mock-ups eating the requirements of Chapter §
shall provided. Al, the mock-up photographs re
(quired by par. $3 shelbe provided.
‘The contractor shal furnish reference material of
foe facies and admisrtveasistance to fctate
‘conduct ofthe Mockup Review. Mock-up data and
Inepetion check? its shll be provide, in accord-
ance with par. 53,
4-7 ENGINEERING DATA
Since the data whi fallow arent always required,
and the extent o which they are required is mentioned
{in DD Form 1423, no use is made ofthe imperative
‘verb “aha” a in oka sections of the handbook
47.1 AERODYNAMIC AND FLUTTER
INVESTIGATION PROGRAM REPORT
‘A report will be ssbmited showing the planned
serodynamic and flater investigation program and
fehedale. This report amplifying the overall program
land schodle of the AQS, wil olin the purpose and
‘Scope ofeach proposed investigation; indent the test
Toles tobe employe, nd st dates end occupancy
time requied descrite the scale and typeof models 0
‘beconsraced and tase, an present the range fat
‘arable tobe investigated. The requirements of MIL-
“A-EETO wil appl to Wind tunnel Mute model invest-
‘alons.
‘Where use of Gotemmental fats spanned he
contactor will mak preliminary contact with the
facliy to determine fasibiity and dasiabiy of con-
ducting the proposed investigations and to obtain ten-
tative confimation of avait. I tha ests are tobe
conducted in a peal) operated facility, a detailed
‘desorption of tet te be condneted pls specie tt
objectives wil be subsite. Following approval of
‘the report, formal sequestdetaitng the specie test
programs willbe male to the est fit
‘When aerodynamic and ter model are require,
the model design wil be table for carying out the
‘evestiation program, including scale mtio. and
‘trength and installation features, and fr utlization
‘he maximum practial number of sitable alternate
Goverment tnd pate test felses. Approval of
the model design bythe operator ofthe ext facies
tobe utlized i required prior to model construction,
Mode! dramings shod be made aalale fo the pro-
coring activiy on request. For dynamic an fee Hight
‘model investigations, weight inertia, and other pet
nent design information musi be Frnishe for simula-
tion of fllele conditions in the construction ting
ofthe mode.
aa from aerodynamic and ute investigations
wil be kept cueent by prompt submittal of pertinent
‘port which include:
1. Intern Lester Reports. These willbe submited
‘immediately following completion of each fait cc-
cupaney, they wil over items Such 35 tts con-
feted, scope, contactr’s observations ofthe tests
‘ncloding any diiclies encountered, sgncant re
‘ls and sny conclusions or recommendations bast
fon inspection ofthe availabe preliminary tet rests
2 Aerodynamic Test Data Reports. These will
‘present the basic aerodynamic fa and tet resus
‘bine from the investigations conducted in contac:
torfurished and private tet feces, Aerodynamic
test daa obtained fem Governmental faites wil be
provided by thefacity. The eports shoul identify the
‘Configurations tested, ny diflerences fromthe costa
talon texted nd reported on previo, and From the
‘corrent helicopter configuration. Graphic presentation
ig dasited with reference (if posible) to axes consistent
‘withthe ait and control a estinated ying qual
ity report required in pa. 472.5. Talat derailed
data are not desired les speciclly requested.
4, Flutter Model Test Report. report ofthe st
{er modal investigation conducted in accordance with
‘MIL-ACS870 wil be robe.
4 Flor Analysis Reports Preliminary and fn
(Gfreqired ater snd vergence analysis opr Wil
‘submited. Thee reports wl be prepared in accor:
‘ance with MIL-A-S870 and wil compare the Mater
And ivergece limit ped forthe rotr blades and for
{he xed ling and contrl surfaces ofthe helicopter
vith the requirements of MIL--8698. Subject to the
{pprovalf the procuring activity freon rom Mater
or divergence may be substantiated anayscally, with
‘no Mater esting required
4.7.2 AERODYNAMIC STABILITY AND
CONTROL REPORTS,
47.2.1 Digital and Analog Computer
Program Report
the helicopter reponse characteristics are vo be
simulated analyscally on dial and/or analog com-
puters report will be submited outlining the pro-
‘ram and providing for later revisions. Ress ob-
“6AMCP 705-203,
tained fom the computer wil be submited, preerbly
in graphic form.
47.2.2 Flight Simulator Program Report
1a piloted simulator to ati the development i
planned, a report wil be submited outlining the pro-
fram ad providing for Inter revisions. Results ob-
‘ine fom the simulation sues shouldbe submited
by Interim Letter Report similar to those rue
pat. 47.10),
4723 Aerodynamic Stability and Control
and Flying Quality Reports
An nial report containing complete information on
the aerodynamic stability and conel characterises
and rerltant ying quale wll be submited, This
‘report shouldbe updated with revised pags to reflaet.
‘the development progress of the helloper der, pat
sicularly the latest and most applicable resus of the
contacter’ analcl and investigative programs and
ny major configuration changes. The report wl on-
fain al the data necessary to define the aerodynamic,
‘configuration and its contol system characteris,
‘ogeher with flevant data on canter of gravity (CG),
‘weight, and moment and product of inertia. Tn sepa
‘ate section of the repr, all aerodynamic data neces
say fo define the stability and contol characteristic
‘througout the design envelope wil be submited with
ocumentation refeaoss, including inputs such as
sacroelastciy, power (hus), exhaust wake effets, ex
{ermal sores and groand efit, as applicable, Where
applicable data ex, the stability and contol parame
{ers wil be converted into ying quality charscteristice,
Including the eects of automat stabilization snd oom:
‘rol devices, and mt be compared with the require
‘ments in Chapter 6 of AMCP 706201 snd inthe detail
SpeciScation. The methods and procedures used for
this conversion shouldbe listrated. Where applicable,
silable ight est esl wll be presented to substan
tite the data
Taddtion, a completeand updated report electing
‘he inital Aight coatguaton snd data tine prvi=
‘ously wll be submited. Tis eport will deal compl
bee With the requirements in Chapter 6 of AMCP
706-201 and inthe detail specification,
‘A complete dssrition ofthe eloopter o be div
‘ered to the procuring sity for sabiity and contol
tess will be furnished. The descriptive data will be
suicicnt to dscribe the design configuration and de
tail charactecistcs affecting the hlcopicsMying qual:
ties. External details such as aerodynamic surfaces, if,
rag, nd flow contol davis, and exter stores may
44
be shown on thesvew drawings of other sketches,
‘The data will include details ofthe control systems
(Gaudin feo and power systems) such asthe type of
‘contol, serodjnamic end mse balance, gearing ad
boost ates, rim and fal device, mechanic advan-
tage changes, capacities and operating pressures for
boosted sytems, description of artifical ability de-
‘iow, and recommended gain and fllow-onsetngs.
47.3 CHARACTERISTIC AND
PERFORMANCE DATA
473.1 Basie Aerodynamie Data
‘The contactor wil submit all basic aerodynamic
ata used inthe calultion ofthe helicopter perform:
nce; the goometric characteristic data defining the
hicopte configuration, and the documents and/or
references showing the derivation ofthese data (a=
ings, analyses, substantiating calculation’ tet). I the
‘ass is wind tunnel or ight test data, the precadores
followed in adjusting thee data for diference in on
figuration, Reynolds number, surface condions, snd
gimes mast be explained Revision pages wil be sah-
‘ited to refer significant changes, The types oF data
which follow wil be include, 38 sppicable:
1. Drag analysis itemized by helicopter compo-
rents sacha rotor hubs, fuselage, wing, tabling
Surfaces, and landing ear to derive parasite drag
ceofient.
2, Sctions i, drag, and moment coon as
uneions of ange of attack an srspeed foreach new
section. If standard NASA/NACA roils are ore,
these dats may be referenced. Wing efficiency factor
‘e" asa function of wing UR coafcent will be re-
ported.
5. Incremental drag ooefisint for drag viens
ch reuired extemal stores tank, po, ez; eomb-
tations ofthese, a appropriate, fo the hlicopte on
‘guration and losing capable,
4. Nondimeasional hover and forward fight per
formance curves (rast and torque count, snd,
for forward fight, advance ratio).
5 Rotor blade stall and compresibiity Kimi.
6 Ground efets at appropriate whee! heights.
1. Natthrost, power availble nd fuel flow variae
tions verus appropiate altnes, temperatures and
ar, topical and hot days in acordance with MIL
SSTD-210), and spend, Dat ho are required for bath
fated engine power and partial thrust/power ops
Sos, with ll loses (tering, indton system, no
es, blends, aoosory delves and power extractions,
~~transmission lose, efciences, et.) and tail rotor
powers indicated.
Complete aerodynamic desciption af main o>
tors) and atone or including parameters such
radius, mumbe of aes, chords, effete oiity
ato, twist taper, hinge oll, il and tip geome-
fry, and hovering tip speed wing and contol surface
‘rea and geomery, weted area of components andthe
Ishiopte, overlap and projected diskares for tandems
47.32. Substartiation of Performance Data
Report
“This report wil be mbites, along with a copy of
the curent General Arrangement Drang (ee pr
47.9.1) to sbstatie the performanos shown on
ach ise of the Stmdand Aira Characters
‘Chars describe in pat. 473.3, The aerodyeamic dats
‘of pat. 47.1 will beinclade, using the format and
ever content in accurdance wih applicable reqie:
‘ents of MIL-CS01 1. Revision tothe previous report,
til be submited whenever change in ebicoptes con:
Fgration, engin), cr bso aerodynamic dat result
in sgiicnt performance changes
47.33 Standaud Aircraft Characteristics
(GAC) Charts
‘The Fit, Segond, and Thied SAC Chars wil be
‘prepared in accordance with MIL-C-SO11. The ist
Cart wl be sbte based onthe aerodynamic data
eqn in par. 73 and a coop by the procure
ing atsity. The Second and Third Chars, reflecting
current performance satus, will be submaitted—based
fom Government Might tts, contactor Sight tests, or
‘alculations—in the onder of preference avaiable at the
time these chars are equsted by the cognizant pro-
casing atv
4-74 WEIGHT AND BALANCE DATA
“The contactor mist establish a system of weight
control and reporting in accordance with, MIL-W.
2SId0 andthe propeed Weight Control Plan (at.
101 of AMCP 706.201) approved by the procuring
sactivily. Data to be sobmnited daring the development
insinde
1. Weight and Bdance Control and Management
Program Plan. This eport provides dats on intent,
approach, and methoss co be used to insure minimal
sight and talance ‘erations within contains of
fpeciscation degn rgurements, program cost, and
schedule,
AMCP 706-203,
2 Estimated weight and balance report, when
specifically requested by the procuring activity
5, Weight and balance status reports
4. Caloulatd weight report
5. Sample Chars and Ein AN O1-1B-40
6. Actual weight reports and appendies. Prior to
releing the helcoper for Might, the Cognizant Ser
‘vie Plant Activisy(CSPA) wl nsre tht thas been
‘weighed to determine actual weight snd CG. The con.
‘Wactor wil insure that loadings employed for initial
flights donot joopardie sey of Fight from a atrength
cor Ring quality standpoint, and that more eviseal
Toading for subsequent flights are approached grado
ally Weight and balance data for text heioptes will
Inve een submited and accepted prior to conducting
emonsiratons|
1 Approved Chars A and E and revisions in AN
o1.1B-40
48, Pot design weight analysis report, when
specially quested by the procuring activity. Tis
"port wil be submited nt later than sx months afer
Avery of the first helicopter, and wil contain the
following information:
‘A bref dicusion of the weight dasin
ples, the procedures and methods for
fesplamenting wight control ajetves, and
the orpnizational sactare of the weight,
group
1. Graphic plots of the predicted and guaran-
‘eed empey waht, and the pray msion
oss weight versus time
Tabulations of the osinal group weigh,
and subsequent changes through major
‘hange pins a shown on Tem Bb 0 the
final weights
A. Brief deserpton or identification ofthe ms-
{or changes fr each weight group in Tem.
475 STRUCTURAL DESIGN, ANALYSIS,
AND TEST DATA
‘These data and reports should be submited in a
ordance withthe requirements of Chapters? and &
tnd pars. £79 and 7.13,
4.7.6 HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING
DATA
‘Reports wil be submited in accordance with MIL-
[HLAGESS, andthe appendix thereto, implemented by
4sAMC? 706-203,
the contract’ approved Human Factors Eainering
Plan (par. 4-46). Included are:
1. Hon fictors engineering (HPE) test plan
2. HFE progress report
3. Operator task load analysis
4 Operator/maintiner postin planning data
5. Work and ere station layouts
6 ternal and external noise survey data
7. Final FE report (ee par. 47.13 for human
factors engineering veiision plans and reports)
1 Airerw station vision report.
447.7 SYSTEM SAFETY DATA
“The data to be sobmited inch:
1, Hazard analyses, in accordance with MIL-
SSTD-282 and the approved System Safty, Program
Plan (par3-2.2)
2 Sytem safety specifications for the sytem and
‘ach contract ender (par. 3-24)
47.8 RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY
DATA
Contractor data requirements will ince: |
1, Relailty and maintainability reports, in c-
cordance with MIL-STD-1304 sod MIL'STD-40, i-
cling analyses and summaries to show quantitative
Intertelationships and wade off between reliability and
‘mainainabiity (pars 10-11 and 102.1. (Se pa.
47.13(1) for elbity tet plan and reports)
2. Maintenance engncering analyses, in accord-
ance with TM 38-7034 (pr. 10213)
3. Logistic support reports in accordance wit the
[Maintsnability Pan (par. 4-4(5), covering areas such
8 development and implementation of the mainte
‘hance philosophy, handbooks, maintenance tines
nd taining, provisioning, and GFE.
47.9 SUBSYSTEM DESIGN APPROVAL,
DATA
‘These data—incuding dawings schematics anda
‘sxiated substantiating analyses, calculations, and de-
tale information for siframe sod propulsion, and
rive systems and equipment subystems—willbesub-
ried to the procaring acuity for review during the
‘Seti design phase. The drawings hou the layout
‘ris drawings normally prepare by the contractor,
‘hich show the equted information. Legit af the
ravings must be sock that all ines are distinct and
46
sppearin their entirety, and that alles etring,
{nd other characters are clear, Where applicable the
rawings wil include all reference to spctetions
require for materials, procsses, te. Drawings re
‘quired by pr. 479.3 t0 4.79.7 will show the major
‘Sractral design features including all portant fit
ting attachments, carry-through structures, joint,
splloes,load-arrying doors, cutouts and other dso
tints, typical sections through lod-earying met
bes, mates employed and ext treme, types of
riveting, typeof wean. an other methods of atsch-
‘ment of important parts: The contractor ant indicate
‘early om al reqied drawings any authored o re
(quested deviations frm deal or other applicable de
sign specification requirements in order to faite
Governmental evew. The atetion of the reviewer
‘should be drawn touch deviations by ela markings
‘on the drawing in coloed crayon or other stable
‘means (par. 42) All drawings will be submited =
Dromply as practi and wll not be delied wnt
Complete fllow-on assembly, instalation, oF engi-
fearing drawings have been prepared (pa. 48.13).
‘The drawings and astociatd data Kite subsequently
vl be subi.
479.1 General Arrangement Drawings
‘These drawings will include the applicable informs
tion specified in Appendix A ofthis chape.
47.9.2 Inboard Profile Drawings
‘Tass drawings, consisting of side elevation and plan
views and inching the necessary crass sections,
Should show ta praca! doges major structure; en
ine drive system and gearbores, equipment; arma:
‘ent; Useful lod items normal etrancevays, emer
eency ents and escape tees; ad locaton of erew,
Dasengers, and thelr equipment. Each item wil be
[need pial. The elevation view may be on one shest.
andthe plan view on another. The outings a the main
‘trocar lle dashed ines and the sytem nla:
‘on in ful ine The information shown mute be in
agresment withthe weight and balance data reqiret
In par £7.40) The sefeonce es foe horizontal an
‘etc ams used inthe weight and tance ata Wil
be shown,
47.9.3 Rotor(s) and Propeller(s) Drawings
Drawings ofnon-GFE rotor) and propellers) will
Inclade: plan view shoeing enterins of al main
embers, general distbation ofthe main structural
‘atrial together with typical cross sections in the
chonise dzecson inlading sections Urough the
pay
yAMP 706-203
sa; spa joints betneen spar and ibs; typical view
‘ofthe bby and views cf dampers, restranes and typ-
cal attachment Stings
47.9.4 stabiling/Control Surface
Drawings
“These drawings wl inlide plan views ofthe sur-
‘aces and control suraces showing cetelines of a
member tab installations general stbuton of main
‘Mructral material and pial ross sedons in the
‘chordie direton, including Sections through the
‘ain teams fil pints between beams and ris
bolkhends method o” skin seinforcement; structural
frrangement around. major discontinuities; ypc
views of fasage attachment and, where folding i
‘Tegured, eset fens of the hinge and old mee-
47.95 Wing (Compound Helicopters)
Drawings
‘These drawings wil show the typical information
cuted for nablseg surfaces, including applicable
Body Drawings
‘These drawings wil include a plan and elevation
view ofthe fuselage tutor showing centrines fal
tmsin member; general distribution of main srctural
tater with typical crows sotons af stingers, bull
Frade and fame and typical views of rotor pylons,
‘mast stabilizing surces, booms, landing ger, engine
‘moon, and jacking d/o hosing sling attachment
fittings and carry-thmooghstractoes, snd installation
and sembly of Fixe anid movable secons of cockpit
tr cabin eclosutes, tng all peratng and emer-
ency controls. The drawings must bein suficent de
fai o show tie mehod and materials employed in
‘einforcing and mousting transparent components and
Fringes tac, rolers guides, Hit assemblies and other
components of morable secon mechanisms: the
‘etiod of latching novale sections in pen, cose,
fd intermediate potions andthe med of emer:
tency operating of jtisoning movable sections. IF
‘ower operations used, the drawing should be acom
Dini ty calelatin indicating the power ad time
Fequied for both nomal and emergency atuation une
‘er erica loading conditions
4797
‘These drawings wil iciode design load waterline,
total iplasement,loeaion of CG anda able of of.
‘ets; caleulations for total volume ofthe hl, a cal-
‘lations to determine the raged bulkhead locations
{nd heights including data to show the margin pint
‘pseting lrmover ange) under the worst condition,
Including flooded and unflooded compartments carves
epesentng the variation in raft tim, and center of
‘buoyancy fra range of horizontal CG values beeen
the recommended helicopter forward and aft limi,
and gross weights, with suceasive prs of adjacent
‘compartments flooded: and sketch (10 sale) showing
the locaton ofeach watertight bulkhead, waterline ob
tained with succesive pars of compartments ode
(Ge normal load and corresponding CG), and location
stench hatch and enclosure, using the bow ad keel as
{he datum ine for dimensions. (Note: These data may
‘be obtained y appropiate tank testing of a sea i
placement mode! of stable size, in which case w de-
tld description including photographs ofthe euip-
‘ment shouldbe include)
Hull Drawings
479.8 Landing Gear (Wheeltype)
The contractor will subi
1. A general arrangement drawing ofthe lending
par, showing the side view elevation relationship of
landing gear to fonlage srocture, and tothe most
forward and mot aft CG location. Information te
(quite in Appendix Ao tk ehaptr par 3 J 8,
14, 9, ed and 10k—mustbe shown, as applicable
2, Three drawing) of the main and nuit
ary gear showing principal members It the sear
retractable, wil be shown inthe fully extended and
Fetracted postions and the mst eric elarance di-
‘mensions othe wel well beeen stractaral memibas
fod othe equipment wil be identified. The principal
‘members ofthe gear wl include outlines ofthe shock
strat, drag brace tension strut, torque arms je
ns, towing and teow tings, whens and beac
fs if used), raraton and extension linkages, actu
tors, shrink kage, tering and/0r shinny damper,
‘plocks, and downlocks. Wheel and tire toein and/or
‘amber angles in relation tothe sae or set willbe
{ndicated. Ottne of dor linkages wll be shown in
‘elton to gear Inkages and. fencons. Type of
Iateral and heat treatment information should be
sted o indeed forall principal members ofthe gear.
5, Nosestering towing, and turnover ange dra
ing, consisting of «plan view showing the tread and
‘whoalbaee of landing gear and distance berwen dual
“‘AMCP 706-203
wees; maximum not seeing angle and corspond-
{ng minim ering rains about the main gear max-
imam aniiary pear swivel angle for towing sing tow
‘bur snd minimum turning rads about the main gear;
snd turnover ange with the most evtcal CG location
4. Tiedown arrangement drawing, consiting of =
plan view showing the compleetadown configuration;
attachments o helicopter gear; oselage, wing, and ti)
fittings; and angles extendingto ground iedown points.
5 Helicopter jacking rain, showing location of
Jacks and helcopter jackpints nclaing all slage
‘dor wing pints and wheal axle and/or strat points
6 Landing ear din report including te infor.
‘mation and calculations specified in Chapter 12 of
AMCP 706.202
7. Landing pear specification or specification com
tool drawings, a8 applicable, forthe:
1. Nose or til whee!
1b Nowe o tal wheel tie
Nove shock strut
4. Nose gear steering and shimmy damper
Solid ti and/or Pamper whest
Bumper whel tire
{Main wheel and brake assembly
1 Main wheal te
1 Main whoa shock strat
4 And brake contol system,
Main and nose gear actantors
Sf installations and/or emergency Htation
ex
sm. Rofor brake
1 Steering and damper,
47.9.9 Landing Gear (Skidtype)
‘The contractor wll submit drawings landing gear
design por and landing ear specication or spci-
‘ation contra drawings sia to thse cited in pat.
4£79.8andas applicable to component ofthe skid eat
‘configuration, including ground handling whee
479.10 Landing Gear (Floatype)
‘Drawings and data required shoul include:
1, General arrangement drawing of the landing
ear, showing the side and font view elevation res
Sonsips ofthe feats and the center of buoyancy in
Sati attitude to the most forward, most aft and most
lateral CG locations. Water clearances of eritclhel=
copter sraosur, Hore, nd propeller to lat clearance
vw be shown,
2, Float line drawings and sketch simile to those
speci forthe hall (pr. 479.7).
“
3. Buoyancy calculations and curves similar to
those specified forthe hall (pa. 473.7),
479.11 Landing Gear (Skitype and Bear
Paws)
Drawings landing gear design report, nd landing
sar specification or speseton contol éravings,
Similar to those cited in par 7.98 as applicable to
‘components ofthe ski gear configuration, willbe sub-
mites,
479.12 Engine (Main and APU),
‘Transmission, and Drives
Data sabital requiements wil include
1. Propulsion system schematic drawings showing
«fonctions arrangement of the location and entifon-
tion of all pertinent components of the systems snd
ements: Ibrcation, fie, sit Induction, cooing
power transmision, auxiliary power, engine inlet an
‘cing filtering or potcle separator, aseaory doves,
firewall, infared radisonsuppreson, exalt, com
trot, and smoke abatement. For turbine engines,
sccordance with MIL-D-17944, «report ofthe cleula-
tion of et les wil be submited with the indton
system schematic drawing. An analysis ofthe propa-
Son sytem cooing and exhaust systems be pro-
ded, showing temperature and pressure design Hts
for fselge and components, require airfow, and
‘at units (BTU), and wl be sabe with schematic
Arawings of thee systems.
2. Propulsion sytem installation drawings ex
cluding foel and oi! tanks, dealing the location,
‘mounting, vibratory isolation, and aces for inspection
and muintenane of al systems and elements: engine,
‘ually powerplant, fi, ableton air ndcton,
ooking, starting. propulsion contra, eagine ine ant
ieing, itring or particle separator, accessory drives,
infrared redation suppression, power transmission,
tnd smoke abatement. For power transmission sy
tems including gearboxes, drawings alo wil include
Ibrctin system, earings, and gearing typical views
fof transmission housing including mounting prov-
‘ions typical eos sections and deals of elnch mech-
‘anion, re-whesing deve, olor bake, shatings and
sft supports and torquimiting dvios
3. A separate and complete list of all contractor
furnished components used in each applicable system
willbe submited, This ist need nt nce el anc
‘aks, ines and fisings and instrumentation. Compo-
‘nents wil be anled under suvellance system as
follows. A schematic diagram willbe submited forAwicP 706-203
approval with design report. After approval, repre-
Senatives ofthe procring activity, the CSPA, andthe
‘contractor will furver the system and easily each
‘component a either “wrvellance” (complex modified
fnd/or deveopmentl unis) or “nonsurvellance”
(other modified or aF-theshelf items). Sorvellznce
items wil equte FO transmittal ofall design data
Aocuments for releaseby the cognizant review activity
prior to contractor procurement action. Survellance
fhams to be approved will be accompanied by detail
assembly drawings showing installation and mounting
provisions, itertaldaign details, materials, and per
formance sharscerites. Nonsurveiance seme ill
equi the sae data surveliance items bt will aot
be submited for rele Instead the contractor should
saintain a feof the data cm nonsurvellance tems
boc to the procuring activity of CSPA inspection at
ny time In event of dispresment as 1 suvelsnce
‘category, the procuring atv’ decison willbe final
4 Design dats al instalation deal of iteaal
and exteral fuel tans, obiating oil tanks, and re-
‘Spective syste piping wil be subratied witha com
let ist fal piping and ftngsGnluding tank f=
tings) for the feel and Iobreating oll ystems
[Nonstandard parts wil be marked and itemized sepa
rity
5. A complete performance and function! pe
{ermance and function analysis report wil Besubmai-
ted inctoding all pertinent data ie, ow rates, pres
sure, fritonal lod and power consumption, and
torque requlemens fr al appieable propulsion sy
a7
13 Flight Controls and Stability
‘Augmentation Systems
‘The contractor wil submit drawings, engineering
ata, and calclations forthe fight contol system in
fccordance with MIL-E-I4372. Alo to be eubmated
fre drawings which include an engineering layout
‘Showing lation of system component, range of
‘movement of controle and contol surface, diagrams,
and engineering dat the stem a appropriate and
in accordance with NIL-C-18244
7.9.14 Electrical Loads
Daa requirements wil inches
1. AC and DC electrical loa analyse in sccord
ance with MIL-E-T01, Letter of ransmital wll oom
‘ment on the adequacy of the power supply. These
Snalyses are
‘Preliminary led snalyss, which wil form
the bass for selecting, power generation
equipment and for design of generation and
‘stbution system
Intermediate load analyesicorportingsg-
scat load or power source changes subs=-
‘quent othe submittal ofthe prefiminary lad
Salt
Final corrected load analysis, which wil be
‘marked "Final Corested” and wl ocde
allchanges incorporated inthe complete heli
oper Ino changes have been made to data
previously sutnited, anew cover sect will
te subenited which stats thie The vales
tered in this analysis wl be measure v
2. Wiring diagrams in accordance with the re
quirements of MIL-WS088. These diagrams wil i-
‘lade sient equipment internal circuitry to allow
Tocundersanding he ystem function. Able deep
Sion of any system oF equlpmeat not having readily
cognizable operating fonctions will be eluded with
the following diagrams:
44 Protminary wiring dingrams consisting of
‘oth lementary, sngleine fonction!
{rams and schematic functional diagrams of
the power dstebaton and lighting ystems
'b. Master wiring diagrams, consisting of instal
lation schematic wiring dagrams giving in
formation of interconnection of component
This wl include identification of wites, com.
nestor, juntion points, terminal Hock, and
gupment
5. General arangement drawings ofthe decal
‘equipment installation showing the leaton ofall ma
jor ems of electrical equipment
4. terior lt instalation drawing showing lo-
cation and viiiy characeisticn Any deviations
from the requirements of MIL-L-6730 must be in-
heated
5 Nonstandard electrical equipment spesifcn-
tions and substantiating data in accordance with
‘MIL-E-7080.
479.15 Hydraulics and Preumatics
‘The contractor wll submit enginering data, draw
ings and calculations in accordance with MIL-H-5440
‘nd MIL-P-SSI,reapectvely, fr kydraulic and pew
matic subsystems.
479.16
(Contactors wil saben
1. General arrangement drawings of avionic
Avionics
“0AMCP 706-203
euipment installations showing the location of all ma-
Jor items of lstronc equipment, the exterior arrange:
‘ment of electronic conras for erew members nclading
console and control panels, an the location of exterior
uipment. Drawings or photographs ofthe ensole
‘mount and control panes wil shew lary the leaton
‘teach control palin elation to other contol panels
in each compartment. Each cotrl pane wil be det
fied using Miltary Standard nomenclature where ap
pleable
2 Antenna sytem drawings, model data, and
spscificaton and engineering fepots, in accordance
‘with MIL-AT772
3. Radome engineering dat, defining the radome
and its characters, inclading overaltansnisib-
ity curves, boresight shaft charters, radar track:
ing noise eects of equipment located in or affixed to
the eadome, and changes to electrical characteristics
resulting fom radome heating
4. CFE avionie design dats, in czordance with
MIL-D-18300, when CFE electronic equipment or ss
tems, oF modifiation of GFAE, are retired
479.17 Instrumentation and Navigational
Equipment
“The contractor wll submit
1. Arrangement drawings of instruments and
navigational equipment deserted in MILT-18573,
‘These drawings wil include all support, panels,
all eleeial connector; all plot snd sate
canncton fins all Mui conection Figs; and all
inerfaces such as hose, wing, and wiring neoasary
{or proper instalation and operation. Sketches will be
furnished showing the location of extemal airame
stores in ration opt or ttc sensors whose oper
tion or removal may cause a change in air mash meas
trement indication
2A block digram showing all components nd
onctionlly iota circus of the entire instrumen
tation system. ‘This Bock diagram will enti, by
‘Governmental nomenclature, each component of the
‘jstem, and will inelude the functional relationships
and purposes ofthe components.
5. CFE design data in accordance with MILD-
18300, when CFE instruments and navigational equp-
mentor systems of modification of GFE, ar require,
410
479.18 Grew Stations, Furnishings, and
Equipment
47.9181 Seats
‘The contractor wil furnish drawings ofall seat as
semble and installations for crew, pasenges, sod
{eoops and ites for meical evacuees. IF appicabl,
these drawings must how range of adjstnent and
incine all safety belt, shoulder harness, or oer =
Sralatinsallasons and conta parachute provon
takeup mechanisms/devics tracks catapults /rckets
motors ris operating ger, abilzng and personnel
parachutes: limb restraint systems, and other com-
Ponent/subasiembles required for setable sets by
MIL-S-18471. The sequence ofemergency escape opet-
tons using the ectable seats must be indicated
47.9.18.2 Survival Systems
Contractor requirements wil inciude:
1. scape mechanism drawings (other than for
sietable seats) showing instalation and indicating se
(quence of emergency cape operations, including
Slowed and mechanically jected life rift installations
2. Drawings and data for fie detector, suppres:
son, and” prevention system installation including
hand, engine and aniary power uni fe extinguish-
3. Drawings for oxygen s)stem instalation in ac.
cordance wth MIL-1.8685 or MIL-119326, as wplion-
be showing a phantom) any adjacent armor, sce.
Ieous crew equipment and fui systems sch see,
oll cr hydraue
4, Drawings and data for carbon monoxide deteo-
tion, in accordance with MILSTD-40,
4-7.9.18.3 Environmental Contral System
Drawings and data which fllow will be furnishes
1. Heating. and venting system installation
dang and dat in ncondance with MIL-H-18325
2. Thermal insulation installation drawings
3. Cabin pressurization nation for pressurized
sicopters, inaccordancewithMMIL-E 18927, clading
eating, cooling, and venting provisions
4. Engozering data fo air-conditioning and press.
trzation systems which cover the hiopter profile
should include an sir supply for cooing and demon-
rte that moisture doesnot condense within elc-
tronic components. Tn addition, the means wed for
eliminating entrapped moisture should be indicate,
5. Installation drawings and data of acoustical in-AuoP 706-203
————————————
‘ulation in accordance with MIL-$.614¢ and MIL-A-
806
6 Antiicng ane/or deiing, fogging, and de-
frosting installation data 8 fllows: wing and empen-
‘nage antcing sputen Gn accordance with MIL-D-
S804 for. pneu oot systems and with
[MTL-T- 18407 fr themal sntcing stem) al ran
sparencis requiring protection in accordanoe with
[MILT S842 (wth MIL--18289 or Mui systems), and
systems fr protection of periscope lense, fel vents,
‘domes, antennas snd stores
"7. Analytical ror ofthe antiiing of engine sir
{induction and related equipment showing compliance
withthe deta spenfcation. The report will contin a
‘exertion ofthe operation ofthe inlet antcing sy
1 Drawings ofthe windshield and other ranspar
ent components of wiper, washing, degreasing and air
‘ast system installations, s applicable
9, Drawings, tst reports, specification contol
drawings, and other engineering. dats applicable to
fonstandard parte ewionmental conral ystems
47.9184 Equipment
awing and date requirements wil ncude:
1. Constant sped deve system detail speciation
tus onthe requtenents of MIL-T-701, system and
‘nsallton drawing, and sabstantiatng caleulations
Showing adequacy othe system to fll ts operating
2. Rese host nstalltion drawings
3, Cargo hoisting and ading installation dram-
ings
{4 Drawings of photographic equipment install
tions showing eamira combinations and components
fd mounting arvangerint nluding relationships of
‘ames, hlisoptersrvctur, and camera windows. A
System wiring diagam wil be incded
5 Enginserng dt for external tanks (CFE), in
sccordence with MIL-T-18847; installation drawings,
‘etal spsfiation for the ank() load and stress an
Suis tops in accordance with MIL-S8038 0 MILA
§3e0, as epplicablean procedures and ime for inst
Inton or removal of the tanks) and removal and
teplacement of fufional components ofthe tank()
6 Drawings cf the aerial refueling syste (98
tanker and/or rciver; 1/40 sale drawings showing
tanker with drogeteiled andthe areas of rotor dow
trash and engine exaust wake, and receiver, with
probe extended, if retractable; a report covering ait
Fefacling capbiity dita such a8 aerial refeling en-
‘elope ofaitude verso tr srspend fel ransfer ate
Nernuspresture atthe reception coupling or rcsier
rozze, and tanker package and component descrip
tion, with design data and installation deals such as
hose ress and mechanization, procedut, and ime ©
inal.
479.19
Drawings nd data willbe furnished according tothe
list which fellows
1. Functional diagrams showing all items of the
otie armament eysem. These diagrams wll enti,
{y Goremmental nomenclature, each tem ofthe
tm, and ml nelide the Functional relationships and
‘purposes ofthe tems The interconnection to sstems
Sich at yd, poesmatic, and electrical willbe
shown,
> Equipment instalation and arrangement draw
ings showing the loetion of all msjor tems of arma-
iment sqipmeat for which provision bas been made,
tnt lation of exterior equipment. Drawings ofthe
onsole moant and contol panes wil show the loca
Son of each contol panel in latin tol other contro
nels in each compartment.
3 Helicopter armament characteris report
44 CFE armament design data in accordance with
(MIL-D-18300, when CPE armament equipments of
fystens, or modification of GFE, ae required
5: Insallaton drawings showing Gn phantom) ex
tents ape thickness an fype of MOF easiest
ted strate inthe viii and installation and re
moval ete for removable armor and other features
fm compliance withthe requirement of MILLS.
‘alist capably of the armor in terms of caliber,
velocity, and obligaty must be indicted,
‘6. Survivability analysis report in accordance with
pat 14-2 of AMCP 706-202
7. Splatpallprotecsion analysis report in ac-
ondance with par. 14-2 of AMCP 706-202.
[Armor and Armament
479.20 Miscellaneous
awings and dat wil be fornished sisted subse
vent:
1. A list fal carrdgeactuated devices usd in
ny stem, such as canopy etisoning, hist cable ul
ovine ight refueling hose guillotine, and emergency
‘Seape dor acuaton. The ist should show lary the
‘ype quan, and system in which the devees are
sed,
2. Rnginering data fr each mechanical ydras-
tis, and peumatc nonstandard part. Tse pat,
an‘AMCP 706-203
Which do ot conform to any approted standard in
Groups Tend II of MIL-STD-148 orto a contactor
standard which bas been approved previously by the
procuring soivity for continuad we inte earings,
ols, cable connecting tings, power transmission
chains, loop clamps, eyelet, fasteners, quik release
fastener, grommets, hinges, hose connecting itings,
hnydanlic and pueamase twhe connecting tings,
thread ingens, Keys Inbreation fing nuts, pian,
sick release pins, spring pin, eollarlocked headed
Pins, preformed packings and gues, ply retain
ing rings, vets, Blind ves, sorews, Springs, std,
turnbuekies, univers Joints, and washers. These data
‘wil includ
‘The reasons an approved standard part can-
not be ued to perform the function eure
by the appliation or design problem
1 The spect materia fom which the partis
smanafactred
© The spec platings, coatings, oF sufice
treatment, if appllabe, shold be com
platy describe
4. Values forthe physi and mechanical prop-
cei, or the performance requirements
specified forthe part,
A drawing ofthe part, with che dimensions
recesary to completely define the geomet
a iit ofthe part.
(For the west specication deeribing test methods and
rocadares tbe used to determine fa product soa
forms tothe spasied requirements see par 4-713)
3. A finish spcification, in accordance with MIL-
1.7179, anda threeview drawing, n ccordtice with
both MIL-1-18464 and MIL-C-18263, Paragraph nan
‘bers of the speifiation wll correspond with those fn
MIL-P-7178 This specication and forwarding leer
wil indicate al desired deviations from MILE179
4d other applicable spesifiaons.
4 Spozal material part fits ncading
«Structural adhesive bonding list, composed of
sandwich eonsriction an, i not obvious
from theese dscritien ofthe parte
tnd their eto. Information wll be i
led ientying the specie adhesives and
adherens used, including he facing and core
‘material f sandwich construction.
1 List of lubricants and any supplemental data
submitted in acsordance wth MIL-STD-838,
5. Report of material and proses development
‘and evaluation, consating ofa rommary tec d=
scription of materials and procises researc, develop
an
rent, and evaluation work which hasbeen conducted
‘or planned under the development contract. I com
ponent containing a radioastve element roquiting ©
lcense from the Atomie Energy Comision i ed in
the heizoptes, the procuring setivity must be nod
ofthe need fora license a oon asthe desig has boo
suliienty defined.
6. Procurement and procs specifications, con
sisting of subsystem, endster, part, aseny,
atria, proces, and purchase specications (Chapter
6), All contactorprepared speifiations for suey.
‘ems and equipment to be farnthed bythe contactor
‘as required by the applieabl eliopter deal spec
tion should be include. The speciation wil bein
sccordance with MIL-STD-490 une otherwise pert.
fed. Specification revision pass will bein accord:
ance with applicable requirements of MIL-STD.430,
1. An interchangeably and replceabiity Hist in
cordance mith MIL-1-8500,
8. Nomenclature and nameplate data in accord
ance with MIL-N-18307, Referenced in tha pei
tion is MIL-STD-196 which defines the ype designe
tion stom used. for eletrial and stone
equipment Tis also referenosd in MIL-STD.S7S
which defines the spe of designation system used for
seronautzal and aeronautical sapport stems. Type
Asigations for photographic ems are dscused to
MIL-STD-185 lem deneton det submit de
cussed in FED-STD-SB, wl bein asordance ith
MILN- 18307
47.10 PHOTOGRAPHS
Photographs measuring 8 a. by 10 in. will be re
quired, and should show the sonsplete helicopter and
the maximum amount of deal na least sx positions
orwatd, rear, port, starboard, three-quarters rn, nd
three quarters rear with wheel, skid sk, and/or ost,
landing ger.
47.11 CONTRACT DETAIL SPECIFICATION
REVISION PAGES
Revised pages for the dtl speiistion should be
submitted in ascordance with MIL-STD-#50.
47.12 HELICOPTER INVENTORY RECORD
‘An inventory record wil be urished in sccordance
with MIER S441awicr 706-203
47.13 TEST PLANS AND QUALIFICATION
‘TEST REPORTS,
‘Component and equipment qualification test plans
and procedures wll Submited in accordance with
the requirements of Chapters 2 and 7, and as iple-
mented specially inthe AQS forthe developmental
program, These plans and procedures wil be designed
fo demonstrate compliance of the components and
Shuipment wth (1) al appieable design incidingen-
‘ronmental and serve Ife) and procurement speci-
{ations o speteatin congo swings nd 2) elie
tality and onitanablty fators reflected in the
lability and aininabity program reporting re-
(quired in pare 4-400, 44 (9) and 478, Aer
Spproval of thete tot plans and procedures and the
Consummation of the tating guacatin tet reports
‘ejng eompllnce with applable requirements will,
te bite. Plas snd report wil be submited for
‘omponets and equpment (representative of produc-
tion hardware) stedsobsequenty, and als for appro:
priate subst, wien formal emonscaion and e-
port f total subaystencompbanee are not specially
eid in pe 718
“The components sn equipment include:
1, Structural iming dynamic, component, in
sccorance wih MIL-S8698 (pr. £75)
2 Surface conte, in accordance with MIL-F-
43: Rotor braking devices, im ascordance with ap-
proved speiiation or specification contol drawings
(ar 4798)
4, Landing gee components, in accordance with
the approved spesfetion of speciation ‘control
frawinge required 7 par 479.87) 4199, and &
‘TB. ineloding wheel, onsting ofa complete stress
“analysis forall fatigue and static los on all major
Components of the test wheel or wheel and brake 3s
sembly. This analy may be accomplished by either
‘halycl or tes sai dts The analysis wl be gov
‘roe by the rquiterents defined in MIL-A-8868
5. Engine (nin and APU), tansmisions, and
Arne, in acoordatee withthe approved pecifiation
‘oF specication cotrl drawings required in pat.
79.110)
6 Fuel system in accordance with MIL-P-38363
and MIL-G-7940
7 Oitlilusionsytem, in accordance with MIL-O-
19858
8, Pal tank, inacordance with MIL-T-5578 for
seltsalng tanks; MIL-T-1884 for exter] aiary
tanks: and MIL-T-27422 for eeash-resitant tanks
9. Oil tank, in accordance with MIL-T-558 for
relfealing tanks
10, Blecrealsubeystem components, in acon
ance with the eontactr’s text plans approved by the
procuring activiy
1, Avinieeubeystem components as follows
12 CFE electronic equipment, im accordance
‘with MIL-L8700 and MILT-5422,AV-
oon, Seton 4, for reliably; AR7O-10 for
tmaitanabiligg MIL-T.23103 for thermal
Cisign, and MIL-IBL for radio intcer-
by, Engineering approval tests, in accordance
with MIL-L$700. Bonding resistance tess
te speaied ia Ter 17
12. testrament and navigation subsystem compo-
ents a alos
‘GFE instruments in accondance with hea
pliable Miltary Speciation forthe tems
Incladed
'. CPE instruments, in accordance with he ap
proved tex plant
«All lnstruments installed in accordance with
MILLIS
4 Integra instrument lighting, i sscordance
trith MILL 25467 (ed ighting) or MIL-L-
37160 wtitelighting), pou or esbrow ght
ing on iastcument panel, in accordance With
MILL2057
13, Seas automated orem escape systems and a
sociated crew frnishings as fllows
Fined sets and manual egress (rash and in
Fighstrctural and functional test fn =
fordanc with the approved test plans
, Automated ecape systems, in_ascordance
‘ith MIL-A-29121, MIL-S-18471, MIL-A-
5426, and MIL-STD-810, as applicable
14, Survival subeytem components and exuipmest
ss follows
fa Rocape mechanisms (otber than setae
feats) inclading sowed and. mechanically
{Geter installations, in accordance
vith the approve est pans
vs Fire deteton, suppression, and prevention
systems inching hand, engine and au
2 power unt fire extinguishes, n accord
[ror with approved text plans and MILE
32285 and MIL-E-7872, a applicable
onAMP 706-203
. Onygen system, in accordance with MIL:
1868 oF MIL-I-19326, a8 applicable
13, Bovroamental conta subsystem components
and equipment as follows
1. lating and ventilating, in accordance with
MIL-H-18325
', Cabin presurizaton, in accordance with
MIL-E'18927
Antkicing, defoggng and defrosting, in sc-
ordae with MIL-T-18607 fr thermal and
MIL-D-8t04 for pacumatic heat systems
‘and with MIL-T-18259 for id eytems
4. Wier, washing depressing ands last ain
removal in accordance with approved test
plans
16. Components andequipment in accordance with
approved test plans a follows:
. Carpo losting nd handing, ncding doors
and ramps
Rese heat
Constant sped drive
Photographic
‘Aci refieling
(CFE eternal fe tanks
‘Armament
‘Armor ballistic tats in accordance with
Chapter 7
&, Cardpeactuatd devices
4. Nonstandard pars
1. Addional reporting requirement, inciuding
‘4 Human engineeing design verification, in 0-
condance with MIL-HE46855 (pat. 41.8)
', Relsility, in accordance with MIL-STD-
1304 and MELSTD-470 (par. 4.7.8)
©, Watertighines in accordance with MIL-W.
6729, for the heliopter, and with MIL
S66, fo hulls and main and usiiary Nes
4 Exhaas sytem endurance, in accordance
with pas 533
Bonding and lightning protection, allows
(DA repor ofthe bonding resistance measure-
‘ments required by MIL-1.5087, This eport
‘ould show the measurement res which
indicate compliance with MIL-B.S087, and
wil attempt to justi eas fling to com>
ly. A new report wl be submited when
fever new measurements are required by a
change in dasgn or construction methods
which materially weet bonding. Minor
Bonding changes may be measured and a
44
sw tnd he pot
suppl
2) A report describing the details of fighting
een analysis end design, ncn the
results of the lightning protection txts ce-
‘quire by MIL-D-5087. This report will in
lode # plan view and profile snd detail
rawings. Anew report must be submited
whenever major change inthe hiphtning
protection system els inthe ned for ade
Alona lighting protection test. Minor
hanges not requiring retesting may be cov-
trad bya revision of or addendom to, the
origina report.
“Hyéeaulc snd poeumatic subeytem end
component tests, accordance with MIL-H-
‘SHO, MILP-3S18, MIL-T-S52, and MIL
8775, as applicable.
(47.14 FORMAL DEMONSTRATION PLANS.
[AND REPORTS
Formal demonstration ground and ght test plans
surveys, and procedures, including instrumentation
snd in accordance wth the requzerets in Chapter 9
‘ust be submited for approval by the procuring ac-
{iiy. These plans and procaure should be designed.
{meet the objectives of the sobeystem and overall
Iniopeer tess specie ia Chapters and 9, including
npats to the overall elability and maintainability re
ports, Following approval ofthese plans and proce.
dures, test progress reports and final reports vecying
‘compliance with the applicable subsjsem and taal
Ihicopter design reuirement il be swbmited. Plans
and reports are required forthe subystems and the
foul helicopter in the ares which follow, representa:
tive of te production hardware:
1. Instrumentation
2, Mechanical inability
5. Aerodynamics
4, Strvctaral
5. Propulsion and power system
6 Avionics
7. Elst
5 nstroments
9. Electromagnetic compatibility
10. Armament
1, Extemal tres
12. Fac system
13, Hydraules and pension
d
VII
)
399
eo)-AMCP 706-203,
———
14, Lebreton
15, Furnishings and equipment
16, Ground suppor: equipment
17, Engi starting
18 Total stem ves
19, Maintinaiity
4.7.15 ENGINEERING MANUFACTURING
DRAWINGS AND CONSOLIDATED
DRAWING LIST
4718.1 Preparation of Drawings
Drawings and referenced documents will Be pr
pated wth compet description ofthe equipment arti=
Bs tobe dalvered under the contac, excluding Gov-
{ramenefurishad component. The tem “equpment
Sricl includes all rteactor furnished, design-ngi>
teeed; material arse the contact end-items, con
{ractorfunished companens, and parts contractor
unised sopport equipment, end spares and reps
ports Drawing and asciatd data wll be prepared in
[tcordence with MEL-D-1000 and MIL-STD-100, and
til contin information sulicient forthe intended se
‘tepoies of MIL-D--000 specie inthe AQS. Apli-
Cable drawings prepredpeevcusly for other applien-
tions but meeting hae requirements wll not be re
Arawo, Drawings wil be prepared and/or revived to
fefoct Clas design changes (sdefind in MIL-STD-
‘BU and MEL STD.-41) CSPA-designted Clas 1 de.
Spe change in sucent time to permit delivery of
Inirfln copis at lest 0 days pir to delivery ofthe
fie equipment article afected by the change. They will,
‘ereved to reflect al otber Clas T changes (0) when
maximum of five such changes per drawing is
Teachol, or 2) withi 30 dys following delivery of the
Inst artic nthe production Block to which the draw-
ings apply, whiever occurs fist.
4745.2 Consclidated Drawing List
‘A complete, consiated Hist of engineering draw-
ings wl be deelopl and maintained by the contrac:
tor a the detail design progress. This st must be
‘Complete in oder o define te current configuration in
ph, toed fo provide an ant wall of the belcopter
‘ate, Revisions to thelist wil reflect periodic addi
tion or revised cravings reskin fom design reviews
fr testing inthe sequential airworthiness qualification
‘Sep The current Bs, periodically revised a8 agrnd
“on bythe entrar andthe CSPA, wil be fished
{othe CSPA and at all design reviews In nal form he
tise wil serve as base for configuration management
of subsequent production becopers.
4.7.16 SUMMARY OF DATA AND
DOCUMENTATION
“The contractor will submit a complete ist in reprt
‘orm of teeta dates for sobmital of sgn dats
required par 4-3. This report wil consis ofthe ties
‘subi dates ofall design data and tiles of other
Applicable data previously submited. This ist wil ef
‘rene contactor Ieters by which data have been sub-
‘ited and the letters by wich data have been a=
epted, and wl show estimated submitial dates for
fata no et submited. The summary should Tis ach
paragraph inthe applicable AQS, and should reflrence
fhe transit Ieee accompanying data submitet
‘der that paragraph
48 REPORTS AND DATA
Reports wil be prepared in accordance with MIL:
STD #31, exept os spied herein. A Table of Con
tents should be provided when necessary to fcitate
‘ready we The sours ofalenginering data sa inthe
Fepors will be referenced, and configurations wil be
(ined leary to provide the dered aut tal. Re
ports and data wil be typewsten and in accordance
Irth MILD $480, nonreproducible copies will be in
[eordance with Typo! Case nd rprodustlcopiee
in accordance with Type 1 Class 2. Nooreproducbie
tlawings wil bein ascordance with MIL-D-S480,
‘Type It Chass 1
‘toe data and dranings wil contain the proper
security clssifetion on each page of reports, spc
Cations, photographs, ec, and on each drawing in 3
Cordence with the exiting secur regulation.
48.1 DATA SUBMITTAL, INSPECTION, AND
ACTION
Quan, ditrboton, and submittal dates of ee
qed data and documentation wl be as specified in
‘Table £1 and in DD Form 1223, Where deta and
Gocurentation are generated bythe contractor 28 the
fen ofthe suggestions ofthe Helicopter Engineering
Handbook Series and where no specie reuirements
se prseribed for submit o the procuring activi,
he contractor shoul sain copies im his les for info
tration and review by the procring activity during
(sign reviews a other milesone points which may
eset.
45)
AMCP 706-203
yg
TABLE 4-1. DATA AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS a
ee ee of Se ee
= eh ikea et fees cere ee [eet -
Se remmenes : A
bits pawmreovess [owes | mower wsrnd 7
Ea ar ec seabearea a
aE: eee a
416 ‘iAMP 706-203,
ec
‘TABLE 4:1, DATA AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS (Cost)
a = Eien acm ee be meer eam a
eae ences =
Seat testes
Bieta Be 7
ee
2S i ole
EE rcranewee ee
ERS Micon pe eee =
elt eee S| ERR =
FE Sih
Ee ees =——
an‘AucP 706-203
‘TABLE 4-1, DATA AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS (Cont)
a
aS ie =
eos =m ——
dII3949
)
3
j
oe
»~
aAMP 706-203
‘TABLE 4:1, DATA AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS (Cont)
aoe a aa
aS = Sh EL a
SS oe enol oe
oe ea 2 = =
a —— :
bisa [mova | vowermovems | eon
5, — ee eeaemener 3 eS Gaerne ee
ae aa emcee
eS ae
: SEGLEEEEEE ewrac wmnens [nome SURES SES
ue eA Se
49‘AMCP 706-203,
ee ea
Maintiniag the planned helicopter development
schedule and delivery dates fo Governmental tests in
accordance with the AQS in order to insure timely
completion ofthe development progr, is one ofthe
contractor's responsibilies. Therefore, the contactor
st make every effort to expedite submittal of data
nd documentation for review, acoptance, and release,
and to proce with the follow-on development and
submital schedule in anticipation of prompt review
land spproval actions by the procuring wctiiy. The
contractor must allow reasonable and commensurate
fime for aduquite Goverameatal review of sbmited
data and forthe potenti impact of revision generated
by witeldrelenses or aceptances
‘The procedure which follows may be employed to
sccomplsh expeditions release of drawings and i+
tawhen itis considered necessary by the Copnifant
Service Plant Activity (CSPA) and the contractor,
and is sujet to approval bythe procuring activity.
Drawings and substantiating data should be submit
ted to the CPA for provisional reese opis should
be ent concurrently Yo the procuring sevity for re
iw and celeste, These deavings and data may be
considered finally related o accopted 30a ater the
{ate ofthe CSPA endorsement, ot sch lange interval
‘8 may be mutually agreed upon, unless otherwise ad
‘vised by the reviewing acvgy within hat perio, The
swords “For Approval Within ~ Daye, or iia leg
end, shouldbe prominent diplayed in the transmittal
Teter acompanying the drawings and data in acon:
‘nce with ths pargraph, The contactor may soe
limited purchase orders for loa eatime tere a well
8 drawings for shop fabristion upon provisional re-
lease by the CSPA of such drawings
48.1.1 Submital
Data and documentation shouldbe submited to the
procuring activity via the CSPA in the quantities spec
fied in DD Form 1623 all try forwarding such
‘materia, and other eorespondence restive to such
‘material when submited previouly ls wl be far-
‘ished in trpiate to the CSPA. Unrelted subject
matter, to be reviewed by the Government, will be
Sumitted under separate forwarding ltes for ease
nd prompts in distribution, review, action, and -
ing by the reviewing activities, Consutation withthe
CCSPA om detail arrangements is encouraged. Ship
‘ments of dats and docaments wil be made st the oo
‘wast’ expense,
40
48.12 Inspection
‘The CSPA will examine al data submit for com:
pleteness, and for complisne with the appliable
syeiication and contractual requirements Data not
conforming to applicable equrements wil be rtuet
othe contractor for revision, rior to submit to he
procuring activity designated in DD For 1423 and
rior co release for manufacture. All CSPA comments
willbe endorsed on the contactors forwarding let
48.13 Actions
‘Acton then on enginerng design, analysis, dan
ings and test data and docamentation will be by re
lease, approval, aseptane, or review information
only) as designated and summaried in Table 1. Engi-
neering data submited for review Gaformation onl)
nea not be acknowledged; however, te ation sci
‘may notify the contractor of any design fentoer which
‘would not be satistacory for fture production ele
Copter. Aedons willbe designated for Army review and
spproval activites onthe applicable DD Form 1423,
fenished wih the REP, Such atiocs maybe redele-
{ed tothe CSPA, or otherwise revised or rele
‘or particular eases. Such revision wil be inicted in
‘he specified data and documentation requirements as
tailored in the applicable. AQS and DD Form 1423,
‘The CSPA wil review the Susmary of Data and
Documentation required in par. 1 for agreement with
the records of his ofc, and comment accordingly
‘when forwarding the summaries ae revisions there
Aer the acceptance of approved drawing, the
CCSPA wil elease ll ratings necessary for manafac=
fare which donot confi with or change the accepted
configuration. The intent of this regurement that,
‘once the basen configuration ofthe design has ben
Approved, the manufataring drawings wil be devel.
(oped and released expeditions.
Tn the release, approval, or acxptance of data and
documentation, the contractor assumes responsibilty
for accuracy or completeness of detail, or for any
‘evatons frm applicable deta or design spsifaton
requirements Als, such release, approval or sept.
nce shal nt be construct as approval or acepance
‘fn Governmental speifentions or standard ler
noed therein, All authorized deviation, or requests
for deviations, from the contract detail specication
nd other applicable specications mist be brouzht to
‘he attention ofthe procuring ay by the contactor
or by the CSPA in is forwarding endoreeatruct-
Jngapproval for new deviations, in secordance with he
rooedare in par. 42AMP 706-203
In eleasing manuictusng dramings fr fabeiestion
‘of pars the CSPA dos not assume fesponstiliy for
the accuracy, competness of deta or proper form,
ft and functioning ofcontactor constructed pars or
semble. The espns for satisfactory construe.
fon and foneioning opt, subsystems, and the total
helicopter spam, and stisfctory weight, perform
ance, ad fying uals, ef, in accordance with che
[pverning contract documents wll est ene with
the eontacie
48.2. REVISION OF DATA AND
DOCUMENTATION
Data and documestation requiring sevision and
resubmit for relas, approval, or asxptance mist
Ive all corrections masked so that they may be ient-
fed and found readily Datasnd documentation—ence
released, approved, or ctepted—will not be changed
‘without ween authoszation by the reviewing activity
nd, when so authored, il be frnished to all a
Areas onthe orignal ditribution is
4-9 MODIFICATION OF
REQUIREMENTS
For programs invlving minor ot major mosifca-
tion of previoonly qualified haicoptr, time, finding,
tnd common see insideations ialate the desia-
bility of tallorng thes requirements to suit the neds
‘ofthe particular ese. Such ation, or guidance for such
‘ston, normally would be iitiated by the procuring
tctvity ins RFP but sls could be intiated by the
ontractor in either his esponse to @ RFP or his sb
tittalof an wasolited propos
‘Such tlloring should sure that al necessary proce
ures, investigations, analyses, te, demonstrations,
land escelated data and documentaion are acom
plsbed nd fornished. This information must be sul-
Tent to provide documented pro! of compliance of «
Configuration with its objectives end to assure savings
inmanpower, tine, and funds afforded by omission of
‘plcate requirements, Deviations from the AQS are
ecto procuring activity concurrence regarding ap
‘lcblity of prior data, and approval of the revied
QS.
‘Wire apliable helicopter engineering data cxst—
nd such data are acoeptle fo the Army and have
teen furnished in sccordance with the requirements
Speciied in Table -1—the contractor submit aly
evied le pages. These pages wil note the appiabl-
ity sevisions, oration, snd the revised or ational
ges and appendices necesary to reflect the differ
{noes Between the protaype and a production design.
‘Procuring activity concurrence with soc applicability,
tnd the extent of data and documentation coverage,
‘would in sch case be refed in its approval ofthe
proposed AQS (par. 42).
atAMCP 706-203
a
APPENDIX A
GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWINGS
‘The general arrangement drawings roqired in par
4479.1 wil const of lly dimensional front elevation,
side elevation, and plan views ofthe heeoper, accu
‘tly portraying th external configuration including
Stores lights, surfaces, antennas, snd other vibe fee
tures, The sale ofthe drawing wll be 1/20th unless
‘otherwise specifad inthe applicable AQS. The draw.
ings wil show at lest the following information, 38
spplicable
1. Reference lines for exabishing horizontal and
vertical distances. The vertical reference ine may Be
the centerine of the fselage he Bull deck line, et
‘The horizontal zelernce line my be the rotor tris
lin, leading edge root chord, fuselage ation 20
Areal or other convenient ference perpendicular to
the verti reference
2, Main and auitiary landing gear ground contact
‘component (hel and tes, ski amphibious gets,
skid gras, ground handling wheel, ax appliabl) in
‘oli ines forthe normal, three-point stated at
‘esgn gross welght condition, the outines ofthe end.
i EE srut postion of doors and firings for rtrct-
she pears tail bumper tal sotor gon: and seul
plats for ski gear. The ground contact components
lo will be shown in dotted lines in flly retracted
posion, nd in the no-load position (fll extended?
kistrailing) nd the full deflated te postions as
‘ce to etablih the ground lines noted in Item 3
‘which follows
3. Ground lines a follows:
‘4 With satis defections of shock absorbers,
tires, or ski
(Normal three poin/shid stiade
(2) Maxim til down
(©) Verte reference line level. deni angles
fo ground lines 31) and 342), snd 3b.
1 With critical combination of no-load end
filly deat shock absorbers and/or tires or
filly deflected skids to establieh minimum
roalle or tilted rotor ground eetrances or
i
42
4 Dimensions and data, as applicable, and suits
‘by tabulated for clarity, where necenry a flows
‘Overall halicopter length, height, and: span
for
(2) Level and static postions (on whee, skis,
skids, and amphibious gs)
@) Folded (rotor, preter, til, wings, oF
blade removed i removable)
(©) Height over fuselage and tal in static posi
tion, and oveal Rept i isting tude
(Gop of sing 0 lowest point gear extended)
', Main and tail rotor) and propeller)
(Diameter
(2) Discs beeen cents a habe
©) Overap
(©) ete dn aca
(©) Tul tae ars
(© Location and angle of thrust line reative to
reference lins|
5, Wing), and sublieing anc tll surfaces
‘Span
Chords, inning loaton, length, and ince
ence of all contraction chords
‘Dihedal, fom horizontal to lnding edge of
chord pane
4. Sweep hack, of lading edge or constant pes
snags chord ine
Designation of sro section
orzontal and veri distances from refer
ence tines to the lending edge mean gered
‘amie chor, andthe length and incidence of
the mean sername chord
4 Horizontal distance fom reference line to
elevator and rudder hinge lines
fh, Stabier incidence
1 Angle beween zr axl of wing an pro-
pelle axea
| Angle betwesa level landing ground line and
‘round lines corepoading to 80%, 75%,
find 90% C, of wings
Areas
6. Mivelaneous surfaces, sucha silrons, spoil
ces laps slats, sped bakes, and tbs
a De
+, Span lostion and span
© Chord
Hinge axis location
Angular movement
Area
1 Landing get, including ground handling
whee
Ted
1 Whestase and location of axle of main
‘whee horimotal reference line (sate posi
tion)
‘Tice sis
Ft tre rolig rit
Ski length
Tall bumper location
1 Clearances
‘Stati ground line to:
(Rotor) 36) in state droped, and 2270
(2) Tail bumper and tall rotor guards
©) Propet tps
by Minimum citi tp clearance ofthe rotors)
{nd propel) rom the sels tl boom,
fr other prs ofthe haicopter
ce, Charaness betwen dike on muleotr/
propeller heonper
44 Minimum areal propeller or ited rotor tip
learans stainable by no load, state, oF
fully delta shock absorbers and/or tes
and lly difleced skis, acading Pat tres
fn main or ausiay gear. Ground line 19
‘which messed shll be dented or define.
AMP 706-203
9, Cente of Gravity
Horizontal and vera ditanes fom refer
oer lines of Ta 1 fo normal gros weickt
ca
by Side sevation angle between ain oining the
(CG withthe pont ofentact of main wheels
‘snd normal othe sta threepint aide
{round line of Tem 2a) fr nose wheels, or
the vertical reference ln evel round line of
Tem (3) for tall wheels
Front elevation angle berween tne joining
‘the CG withthe point of contact of main
tel or skid tubes, and 2 normal to the
Forizontal ground ine
10 For fst andl heioptrs, che following
Avon date
‘Grote displacement of hull each main loa,
tnd each auniary Rost Gir pounds of set
water at 68 16/P)
>. Maximum draft and corresponding weight
femply, normal goss weight, and maximum
foveload gross weight
«Lead watrtne for design gross weight
{4 Groin line with bliopter on amphibious
(gent, satic dfetons, and minimum drat
euired for amphibion gear extension
«Length, beam, and Bight fl, sin oats,
snd ausiery oats
{Ame trtween vertical fren fine andthe
folowing ull or float desk, throst ine, for-
ward Keel at main step, after Keel at main
ep and load waterline
1g Vera distance from reference line to load
‘waterine at ain step
1, Distance from bow to each step of hull and
fats and depth af each step
4. Location of cuter of Buoyancy for design
ross weight condition and hight from e=n-
ter of buoyancy to CG
4 Clenrance of auiay float above ond wate
line and propeller clearance above waterine
or float
1 Applisabi data (Item 7) fr whee portion
of amphibious gear.ig ae
CCE EE OEE CEL EC OECE CE CEE COE CE CEEE EL FOE CEEAMcP 706-203,
CHAPTER 5
MOCK-UPS
5:1 INTRODUCTION
[At an early stage i the development cycle, a fall
scale haleopter macl-up should be fabricated by the
Contactor to fonction aba design too in determining
{he optimum helcoper configuration. This mockup
‘shoal provide a fll representation ofthe physical
‘strangement in sulfiet det to permie demonstet-
ing compatibility oft handing, maintaining oaing,
find operating requirments of the belcopler snd is
‘uipment, Particular regard must be given tocrew and
passenger stations, =argo.and_ weapon provisions,
‘quipment arrangement and propulsion system instal
Into. Visiily for ‘he ight crew lighting, efi
‘learnoes, and persanel salty also taste consid-
ted. Individual sabsdiary mock-ups may be required
for space areas such ae special landing ges, Hight
‘contol systems, engne compartments, and crew sae
tions Approval of the mock wil enable the coatac-
{orto contnus with the design of the stwa elcoplar
‘with resonable asscrane that the general arrange
tment and the equipment installations wil be stisoe-
‘ory.
"Thefullscale mock-up maybe used to asistin pack
ving and in arrangenent trade-off studies foe selec
‘components, Such a mockup offers a three-dmen-
‘Sonal presentation fer other engineering dicplines—
‘sich af maintansblty, relly, producti, and
system safety —to alte and plan subsequent test,
‘demonstrations, The mockup shold be wel a 2 de-
ign tool to estblit fective arrangements of to =
felve subsystem inteace problems as they allet frm,
fit, and fonction.
"The use of prodtion materia in dhe construction
‘ofthe fllacale meet-up i not required. The fllsale
“Structure canbe fact from inexpensive materials
sch am plywood, plate, or foamcore and should
represent the extrtal sefodjnamic configuration a
‘wel asthe internal spe considerations.
‘When required by appropriate procurement action,
the mack-op shal represent aceuratly the size and
location of sructurl manbers in areas which aft
vision and crcl clearanes. Major subsystem compe-
ents, wiring, cable tubing, piping, and stractral
members sal be mocked up (where relevant) to show
the accesbiity of iespeesin and maintenance. The
‘ems mocked up need not be of actual material of
‘weight (unl otherwise spose) however, hey shall
‘be of actual size and shape to depict mounting points
and iit of allontrol movements, The strength ofthe
Imoskeap rrvctare sal! be sufficient to suppor all
‘mock-up equipment and the weight of ispetion pr
orn, nd sha! sccommodate any loading or una
ing demonsrtons or tris requced in par. 52 oF
‘which might be approprite during development ofthe
configuration
"The strength ofthe mock-up structure also shal! be
scent to enable personnel to perform simulated
maintenance tasks with appropriate tools and test
uipmen. All tems not readily identifiable shall be
‘marke clearly withthe appropriate designation and