The Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIP) is designed to assess the probability of a causal relationship between a potential drug interaction and an event. It is patterned after the Naranjo ADR Probability Scale. The DIP uses a scoring system where 10 questions are answered with yes, no, or unknown and scores are totaled. A higher total score indicates a more probable drug interaction. Scores are categorized as highly probable, probable, possible, or doubtful. The DIP provides a standardized tool to evaluate if observed drug interactions are likely caused by one drug affecting another.
The Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIP) is designed to assess the probability of a causal relationship between a potential drug interaction and an event. It is patterned after the Naranjo ADR Probability Scale. The DIP uses a scoring system where 10 questions are answered with yes, no, or unknown and scores are totaled. A higher total score indicates a more probable drug interaction. Scores are categorized as highly probable, probable, possible, or doubtful. The DIP provides a standardized tool to evaluate if observed drug interactions are likely caused by one drug affecting another.
The Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIP) is designed to assess the probability of a causal relationship between a potential drug interaction and an event. It is patterned after the Naranjo ADR Probability Scale. The DIP uses a scoring system where 10 questions are answered with yes, no, or unknown and scores are totaled. A higher total score indicates a more probable drug interaction. Scores are categorized as highly probable, probable, possible, or doubtful. The DIP provides a standardized tool to evaluate if observed drug interactions are likely caused by one drug affecting another.
Proposal for a New Tool to Evaluate Drug Interaction ases. !nn P"ar#acot"er. $%&$'( )7$.
T"e Drug Interaction Pro*a*ilit+ ,cale &DIP,' is -esigne- to assess t"e pro*a*ilit+ of a causal relations"ip *etween a potential -rug interaction an- an event. It is patterne- after t"e Naran.o !DR Pro*a*ilit+ ,cale &lin P"ar#acol T"er %/0%120(22/3$4'.
Directions( 3 ircle t"e appropriate answer for eac" 5uestion, an- a-- up t"e total score. 3 6*.ect -rug 7 Drug affecte- *+ t"e interaction. Precipitant -rug 7 Drug t"at causes t"e interaction. 3 8se t"e 8n9nown &8n9' or Not !pplica*le &N!' categor+ if &a' +ou -o not "ave t"e infor#ation or &*' t"e 5uestion is not applica*le &eg, no -ec"allenge1 -ose not c"ange-, etc.'.
Questions Yes No* Unknown or NA** %. !re t"ere previous credible reports of t"is interaction in "u#ans: ;% <% 0 2. Is t"e o*serve- interaction consistent wit" t"e 9nown interactive properties of precipitant -rug: ;% <% 0 2. Is t"e o*serve- interaction consistent wit" t"e 9nown interactive properties of o*.ect -rug: ;% <% 0 $. Is t"e event consistent wit" t"e 9nown or reasona*le ti#e course of t"e interaction &onset an-=or offset': ;% <% 0 4. Di- t"e interaction re#it upon -ec"allenge of t"e precipitant -rug wit" no c"ange in t"e o*.ect -rug: &if no -ec"allenge, use 8n9nown or N! an- s9ip >uestion )' ;% <2 0 ). Di- t"e interaction reappear w"en t"e precipitant -rug was rea-#inistere- in t"e presence of continue- use of o*.ect -rug: ;2 <% 0 7. !re t"ere reasona*le alternative causes for t"e event:??? <% ;% 0 0. @as t"e o*.ect -rug -etecte- in t"e *loo- or ot"er flui-s in concentrations consistent wit" t"e propose- interaction: ;% 0 0 /. @as t"e -rug interaction confir#e- *+ an+ o*.ective evi-ence consistent wit" t"e effects on t"e o*.ect -rug &ot"er t"an -rug concentrations fro# 5uestion 0': ;% 0 0 %0. @as t"e interaction greater w"en t"e precipitant -rug -ose was increase- or less w"en t"e precipitant -rug -ose was -ecrease-: ;% <% 0 Total score ?! N6 answer presu#es t"at enoug" infor#ation was presente- so t"at one woul- eApect an+ alternative causes to *e #entione-. ??@"en in -ou*t, use 8n9nown or N! -esignation. ???onsi-er clinical con-itions, ot"er interacting -rugs, lac9 of a-"erence, ris9 factors &eg, age, inappropriate -oses of o*.ect -rug'.