You are on page 1of 90

VIN KHOA HC V CNG NGH VIT NAM

VIN SINH THI V TI NGUYN SINH VT

NGUYN TH GIANG

NGHIN CU
NH HNG CA MI TRNG V GI TH M R N
KH NNG NHN SINH KHI CNG SINH NM R AM
(ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA)IN VITRO

Chuyn ngnh: VI SINH VT HC


M s: 60 42 40

LUN VN THC S SINH HC

Ngi hng dn khoa hc: TS.L QUC HUY

H Ni Nm 2012

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

LI CM N
Trong sut qu trnh hc tp, nghin cu v hon thnh lun vn, ti nhn
c nhiu s gip ca cc thy c, cc anh ch v gia nh.
Vi tt c tm lng chn thnh, ti xin by t lng bit n su sc ti TS.
L Quc Huy, Phng Cng ngh vi sinh v Sinh hc mi trng, Trung tm Cng
ngh sinh hc Lm nghip, Vin Khoa hc Lm nghip Vit Nam, ngi tn
tnh gip , ch bo, hng dn ti thc hin nghin cu, gp v sa cha ti
hon thin lun vn ny.
Ti xin by t lng bit n su sc n tp th cn b, gio vin b mn Vi
sinh vt, Vin Sinh thi v Ti nguyn Sinh vt, nhng ngi Thy gip ,
ng vin ti trong sut qu trnh hc tp, to mi thun li cho ti trong qu trnh
thc hin v hon thnh lun vn ny.
Ti xin chn thnh cm n Ban Gim Hiu, Phng o To sau i Hc
Vin Sinh thi v Ti nguyn Sinh vt, Vin Khoa hc v Cng ngh Vit Nam
to iu kin thun li, hng dn,gip ti thc hin lun vn ny.
Ti xin chn thnh cm n CN. Ng Th Thanh Hu v tp th cn b Phng
Cng ngh vi sinh v Sinh hc mi trng cng nh tp th cn b thuc Trung
tm Cng ngh sinh hc Lm nghip - Vin Khoa hc Lm nghip Vit Nam
dnh cho ti s gip qu bu v to iu kin thun li cho ti thc hin ti.
Xin cm n cc bn ng vin, ng h ti trong qu trnh hc tp.
Cui cng, ti xin by t lng bit n su sc nht ti gia nh thn yu ca
ti,nhng ngi lun bn ti, ng h, ng vin v l ch da vng chc
ti yn tm hc tp hon thnh kha hc ny./.
H Ni, ngy 15 thng 11 nm 2012
Tc gi lun vn

Nguyn Th Giang

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

LI CAM OAN
Ti xin cam oan y l cng trnh nghin cu khoa hc ca ti.
Cc s liu v kt qu trong lun vn l trung thc v cha tng c ai
cng b trong bt k cng trnh nghin cu no khc./.
Tc gi lun vn

Nguyn Th Giang

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

MC LC
M U.

1.1. t vn .. 2
1.2. Mc tiu ti... 2
1.2.1. Mc tiu chung....

1.2.2. Mc tiu c th........

1.3. ngha khoa hc v thc tin ca ti..

1.3.1. ngha khoa hc.

1.3.1. ngha thc tin.

1.4. Phm vi nghin cu... 2


Chng 1. TNG QUAN VN NGHIN CU... 3
1.1. Tng quan v nm r ni cng sinh AM... 3
1.1.1. Khi nim.

1.1.2. c im ca Nm r ni cng sinh AM(Arbuscular mycorrhiza).

1.1.3. Vai tr ca nm r ni cng sinh vi cy ch..

1.2. Tng quan v vi khun Agrobacterium rhizogense

12

1.3. Nghin cu nm r ni cng sinh trn Th gii v Vit Nam..

13

1.3.1. Trn th gii ...

13

1.3.2. Trong nc

19

Chng 2. VT LIU - NI DUNG - PHNG PHP NGHIN CU 22


2.1. Vt liu nghin cu..

22

2.2. Ni dung nghin cu.... 23


2.2.1. Nghin cu to vt liu gi th m r in vitro..

23

2.2.2. nh gi nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n kh nng nhn sinh


khi cng sinh nm r AM in vitro...

23

2.2.3. nh gi nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n kh nng nhn


sinh khi cng sinh nm r AM in vitro

23

2.2.4. nh gi nh hng ca gi th m r n kh nng nhn sinh khi


cng sinh nm r AM in vitro..
2.3. Phng php nghin cu....
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

23
24

2.3.1. Phng php b tr th nghim...

24

2.3.2. Phng php to vt liu m r in vitro 24


2.3.3. Phng php cy chuyn v nhn sinh khi m r

28

2.3.4. Phng php to cng sinh AM in vitro

28

2.3.5. Phng php nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro ..

29

2.3.6. Phng php thu thp, phn tch v x l thng k s liu th


nghim.

29

Chng 3. KT QU V BN LUN 31
3.1. Kt qu to vt liu gi th m rin vitro ..

31

3.2.nh gi nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitro..

32

3.3. nh gi nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitro..

38

3.4. nh gi nh hng ca gi th m r n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM


in vitro.

44

Chng 4. KT LUN - TN TI - KIN NGH..... 50


4.1. Kt lun 50
4.2. Tn ti v kin ngh.......... 51
TI LIU THAM KHO.............................................

52

PH LC........................................................................ 58

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

BNG NHNG T VIT TT TRONG LUN VN

STT

Vit tt

Vit y

AM

Arbuscular mycorrhiza

EM

Ectomycorrhiza

IBA

Indole butylic acid

IP

Infective propagules

Minimal medium

MS

Murashige and Skoog medium

MSR

Strullu and Romand medium

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

Ri-tDNA

Root inducing transfer Deoxyribonucleic acid

10

rRNA

Ribosomal Ribonucleic acid

11

TY

trypton-yeast extract medium

12

VAM

Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza

13

VM

Vesicular mycorrhiza

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

DANH MC BNG
Bng 3.1: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitrogia chng 41833 vi gi th m r C rt chuyn gen RitDNA

32

Bng 3.2: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitrogia chng M7 vi gi th m r C rt chuyn gen RitDNA.

34

Bng 3.3: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th m r Medicago chuyn gen RitDNA........

35

Bng 3.4: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitrogia chng M7 vi gi th m r Medicago chuyn gen RitDNA.

36

Bng 3.5: nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitrogia chng 41833 vi gi th m r C rt chuyn gen RitDNA

38

Bng 3.6: nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitrogia chng M7 vi gi th m r C rt chuyn gen RitDNA

40

Bng 3.7:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th m r Medicago chuyn gen RitDNA..

41

Bng 3.8: nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitrogia chng M7 vi gi th m r Medicago chuyn gen RitDNA.........

42

Bng 3.9: nh hng ca cc loi gi th m r khc nhau n nhn sinh


khi cng sinh AM in vitro trn chng 41833..

45

Bng 3.10: nh hng ca cc loi gi th m r khc nhau n nhn sinh


khi cng sinh AM in vitro trn chng M7..

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

48

DANH MC BIU
Biu 3.1: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng
sinh AM in vitrogia chng 41833 vi gi th m r C rt chuyn gen RitDNA.

33

Biu 3.2: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitrogia chng M7 vi gi th m r C rt chuyn gen RitDNA.

35

Biu 3.3: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM
in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th m r Medicago chuyn gen RitDNA.

36

Biu 3.4: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitrogia chng M7 vi gi th m r Medicago chuyn gen RitDNA.

37

Biu 3.5: nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi


cng sinh AM in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th m r C rt chuyn gen
Ri-tDNA

39

Biu 3.6: nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng


sinh AM in vitrogia chng M7 vi gi th m r C rt chuyn gen RitDNA

41

Biu 3.7:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th m r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA. 42
Biu 3.8: nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng
sinh AM in vitrogia chng M7 vi gi th m r Medicago chuyn gen RitDNA.

43

Biu 3.9: Kt qu nhn sinh khi AM in vitro ca 41833-C rt Ri-tDNA,


M7-C rt Ri-tDNA, 41833-Medicago Ri-tDNA, M7-Medicago Ri-tDNA
trn mi trng MSR 0,5% agar, pH 5,5..

44

Biu 3.10: nh hng ca cc loi gi th m r khc nhau n nhn sinh


khi cng sinh AM in vitro trn chng 41833..
Biu 3.11: Kt qu nhn sinh khi AM in vitro ca 4 loi gi th m r
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

46

cng sinh vi chng 41833 trn mi trng MSR 0,5% agar, pH 5,5

47

Biu 3.12: nh hng ca cc loi gi th m r khc nhau n nhn sinh


khi cng sinh AM in vitro trn chng M7..

49

Biu 3.13: Kt qu nhn sinh khi AM in vitro ca 4 loi gi th m r


cng sinh vi chng M7 trn mi trng MSR 0,5% agar, pH 5,5.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

49

DANH MC HNH
Hnh 1.1: Cy phn loi nm r ni cng sinh AM..........5
Hnh 1.2.a: Bi si nm (Arbuscules).....6
Hnh 1.2.b: Ti si nm (Vesicules)........................6
Hnh 1.3.a : Si nm ngoi bo(extraradical hyphae) .....7
Hnh 1.3.b : Bo t (spores) .........7
Hnh 1.4: S cu trc AM in hnh8
Hnh 1.5.a: Cy Medicago truncatula pht trin bnh thng............11
Hnh 1.5.b: Cy Medicago truncatula c cng sinh nm r.......11
Hnh 1.6: Cu trc vng Ri-plasmids ca vi khun A. rhizogenes(Veena and
Taylor 2007)....13
Hnh 2.1.a: Gieo ht Medicago...........24
Hnh 2.1.b: R Medicago pht trin sau 5 ngy.........24
Hnh 2.2.a: Ht C rt ny mm sau 4 ngy gieo ht.............................................25
Hnh 2.2.b: R C rt khng chuyn gen Ri-tDNA pht trin sau 30 ngy...........25
Hnh 3.1.a : R C rt khng c gen Ri-tDNA......................................................31
Hnh 3.1.b :R C rt c gen Ri-tDNA.................................................................31
Hnh 3.2. Phn tch PCR cho m r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA v khng chuyn
gen Ri-tDNA. Bng 1: c gen rolB; bng 2: c gen rolC (cho mu chuyn gen);
bng 3 v 4: khng c gen rolB v rolC (cho mu khng chuyn gen); M: DNA
thang chun 100 bp (Fermentas).......................................................................32
Hnh 3.3.a: R Medicago khng c gen Ri-tDNA.................................................32
Hnh 3.3.b: R Medicago c gen Ri-tDNA...........................................................32
Hnh 3.4.a: R cng sinh pht trin trn mi trng MSR 0,5% agar...37
Hnh 3.4.b: R cng sinh pht trin trn mi trng MSR lng........37
Hnh 3.4.c: R cng sinh pht trin trn mi trng MS 0,5% agar......37
Hnh 3.5.a: AM cng sinh vo r C rt v sinh trng si nm mi.......45
Hnh 3.5.b: AM cng sinh vo r Medicago v sinh trng si nm mi.....45
Hnh 3.6.a: Sinh sn bo t AM trn gi th C rt c Ri-tDNA sau 1 thng.......50
Hnh 3.6.b: Sinh sn bo t AM trn gi th C rt c Ri-tDNA sau 4 thng.......50

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

M U
1.1. t vn
Ngy nay, nhn loi ang rt n lc trong vic gii quyt 3 vn ln, l
(i) Tng sinh trng v nng sut cy trng, m bo an ninh lng thc v nng
lng, (ii) Gim thiu thin tai, nhim mi trng v thch ng vi bin i kh
hu, (iii) Pht trin bn vng v nng cao cht lng cuc sng(AFCconference
2012).
Cc gii php sinh hc theo hng tip cn xanh (Green approach) c
nghin cu v hng ng p dng mnh m nhm lm tng nng sut cy trng,
vt nui, gim thiu thin tai, nhim mi trng v thch ng tt nht vi bin
i kh hu. Nghin cu pht trin ng dng cc ch phm sinh hc, vi sinh, dn
thay th cc loi sn phm ha hc cho tng nng sut cy trng v bo v mi
trng ang ngy cng c quan tm v u t pht trin.
Nm r ni cng sinh AM (Arbuscular mycorrhiza) c nghin cu s dng
nh mt loi phn bn sinh hc, mt mt c tc dng lm tng cng hp th dinh
dng ca cy trng, c bit l hp th Ln v gi nc trn nhng lp a thoi
ha, do lm tng sinh trng v nng sut, mt khc n cng c tc dng lm
n nh cu trc, c tnh sinh hc ca t v l yu t ch th cho mc suy
thoi ca mi trng t.
Tuy nhin, cc nghin cu ng dng nm r ni cng sinh AM mi ch tp
trung nhiu cho cc cy trng ngn ngy, cng ngh ch phm AM vn ph bin
p dng dng th s truyn thng l cht nhim t (soil innoculum), by thc
vt (AM trap plant), cha p ng c cc nhu cu i hi ca xn xut c v mt
s lng, cht lng sn phm, cng nh quy m v hiu qu ca vic p dng vo
sn xut. Do vy, hng i t ph mi trong nghin cu AM l cng ngh nhn
sinh khi AMinvitroc kh nng gp phn gii quyt c cc vn tn ti nu
trn ca cc loi ch phm AM truyn thng, trong mi trng nui cy v gi
th r thc vt ch l nhng yu t rt quan trng trong nghin cu v cng ngh
nhn sinh khi AM invitro.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Nhm gp phn gii quyt cc vn tn ti nu trn ca nghin cu ng


dng cng ngh AM, c bit trong lnh vc Lm nghip, ti nghin cu Thc
s Nghin cu nh hng ca mi trng v gi th m r n kh nng
nhn sinh khi cng sinh nm r AM (Arbuscular mycorhiza) in vitro c
xut thc hin. ti Thc s ny ca ti c thc hin trong khun kh ti
cp Nh nc v Nghin cu sn xut nm r ni cng sinh AM (Arbuscular
mycorrhiza) cho cy Lm nghipthuc Chng trnh trng im pht trin v
ng dng cng ngh sinh hc trong lnh vc nng nghip v pht trin nng thn
n nm 2020.
1.2. Mc tiu ca ti
1.2.1. Mc tiu chung
Nhm nghin cu mt s c s khoa hc cho cng ngh nhn sinh khi cng
sinh AM invitro v sn xut ch phm ng dng cho cy trng v bo v mi
trng.
1.2.2. Mc tiu c th
- Nhm nghin cu la chn c mi trng ph hp cho hnh thnh cng
sinh v nhn sinh khi cng sinh nm r AM in vitro.
- Nhm nghin cu la chn c gi th m r ph hp cho nhn sinh khi
cng sinh nm r AM in vitro.
1.3. ngha khoa hc v thc tin ca ti
1.3.1. ngha khoa hc
Kt qu nghin cu ca ti s cung cp cc c s khoa hc quan trng
cho cng ngh nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM invitro v sn xut ch phm ng
dng cho cy trng v bo v mi trng.
1.3.2. ngha thc tin
Kt qu nghin cu ca ti s xut c loi mi trng v gi th m
r ph hp nht cho cng ngh nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro, lm nguyn
liu sn xut ch phm AM phc v gy trng cy lm nghip.
1.4. Phm vi nghin cu
ti c tin hnh nghin cu trong phm vi phng th nghim.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Chng 1: TNG QUAN VN NGHIN CU


1.1. Tng quan v nm r ni cng sinh AM
1.1.1.Khi nim
Mycorrhiza l th cng sinh gia h si nm trong t vi r ca thc vt bc
cao.Frank l ngi u tin pht hin ra c im kt hp c bit ny r ca cy
Cupulifereae vo nm 1885 v gi l mycorrhiza. T mycorrhiza c ngha l
nm- r, tc gi dng t ny nhn mnh mi quan h gia nm v r cy
(Roger et al. 2004a).
Nm r ni cng sinh AM c xc nh l mi quan h khng th thiu
hu ht cc loi thc vt (hn 90% cc loi thc vt c kh nng hnh thnh cng
sinh AM). S kt hp mang li li ch cho c thc vt v vi sinh vt, qua ,
nm c c cc hp cht ng ha t thc vt sng, ng thi nm li gip r
cy tng cng kh nng hp th nc, cc cht hu c ha tan trong t c bit
l phospho, chng chu cc yu t bnh hi cng nh cc cht c kim loi nng.
Do , c tc dng ci to v n nh cu trc t, cn bng h sinh thi.Quan h
cng sinh ny c bit th hin vai tr trn nhng vng t kh cn, h sinh thi b
xo trn nghim trng, ngho dinh dng hay c tim nng c hi cao. V vy
cng ngh AM c kh nng p dng rng cho nhiu loi cy lm nghip, khng ch
gip to ra c nguyn liu cy trng rng c cht lng cao, kh nng thch nghi
v nng sut tt trn nhng lp a cn ci m cn p ng tt nht cho nhu cu s
dng hiu qu ngun ti nguyn t ai theo mc tiu m rng din tch cy trng
rng nhng khng cnh tranh vi t trng cy nng nghip, tng cng hiu qu
s dng cc vng t hoang ha theo cch bn vng v thn thin vi mi trng.
Mycorrhiza c phn b hu khp cc ni, thy cy c, ru, dng x, mt
s cy l kim, v hu ht cc cy l rng. S ph bin cng vi nhng vai tr tch
cc ca nm r kch thch vic nghin cu v mycorrhiza ngy cng m rng v
su sc hn. Trong khong 20 nm tr li y, nhng nghin cu c bn c thc
hin bi hng trm cc nh nghin cu t cc nc khc nhau trn th gii em
li nhiu kt qu ht sc ngha cho ng dng mycorrhiza trong h sinh thi nng
nghip,lm nghip v mi trng.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Da trn c im xm nhim ca nm vo r cy ch, mycorrhiza c phn


thnh 2 nhm chnh l ngoi cng sinh (Ectomycorrhiza, EM), v ni cng sinh
(Endomycorrhiza, AM).
Ectomycorrhiza:Ectomycorrhiza c nhng cy g ln, in hnh l thng,
si, cng l, nhng cy c gi tr kinh t cao, tuy nhin ectomycorrhiza c tnh c
trng loi. c im ca ectomycorrhiza l si nm ni bo ch xm nhp vo
khong gian bo ca cc t bo vng v r v si nm ngoi bo phn nhnh mnh
to thnh lp v bao quanh r nn lm bin i hnh thi bn ngoi ca r. Hu ht
ectomycorrhiza

thuc

LpBasidiomycetes

nh

Agaricales,

thuc

LpAscomycetes.
Endomycorrhiza:Hnh thnh khong 80% thc vt bc cao. c im ca
endomycorrhyza l si nm ca chng xm nhp vo bn trong t bo v r ca
thc vt bc cao v khng gy nn nhng bin i hnh thi bn ngoi ca r,
thng c mt phn ca si nm cn nm pha ngoi nhng chng khng to lp
v bao ngoi r. Cu trc in hnh ca endomycorrhiza l s hnh thnh nhng
cu trc c bit vesicules v arbuscules. mt s nhm endomycorrhiza ngi ta
quan st thy c vesicules(Vesicular mycorrhiza, VM) hoc arbuscules
(Arbuscular mycorrhiza, AM) hoc ng thi c hai cu trc ny trong t bo v r
(Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza, VAM).
Vy AMl th cng sinh gia nm vi r cy thc vt bc cao m hnh thnh
nn cu trc c bit vesicules, arbuscules trong t bo v r v khng gy bin i
hnh thi ngoi ca r.
Do tnh ph bin, c li v khng c hu cho 1 loi nn nhm
vesiculesarbuscular mycorrhiza rt c quan tm nghin cu ng dng trong
nng nghip cng nh trong lm nghip.
1.1.2. c im ca Nm r ni cng sinh AM (Arbuscular mycorrhiza)
a. Phn loi
Trong mt thi gian di AM c xp vo ngnh ph nm tip hp
(Zygomycota) do cu trc si nm khng c vch ngn, lp nm tip hp
(Zygomycetes). Hin nay, bng nhng nghin cu mc phn t h thng pht
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

sinh loi cho thy Zygomycota l ngnh a h (poli-phyletic), do nm AM


c tch ra khi ngnh Zygomycota hnh thnh ln ngnh mi l Glomeromycota.
Phn loi n cp h cho AM c da trn 4 tiu ch c bn:
- Cu trc mycorrhiza cng sinh trong r.
- Phng thc hnh thnh bo t khi c phn lp trong t.
- Cu trc ni bo t.
- Phng thc ny mm bo t.
H thng phn loi AM hin nay ( da trn trnh t ca rRNA ) c tm tt
trong hnh sau:

Hnh 1.1: Cy phn loi nm r ni cng sinh AM


(Ngun:http://www.google.com.vn/url?source=imglanding&ct=img&q=http://invam.caf.
wvu.edu/fungi/taxonomy)

N
b. Cu trc
Nm r ni cng sinh (AM) c cu to in hnh bao gm cu trc ni bo
(arbuscules, vesicules, si nm ni bo) v cu trc ngoi bo (si nm ngoi bo,
bo t).

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Nhm cu trc ni bo:

Hinh 1.2: Bui si nm (Arbuscules) (a)


Tui si nm (Vesicules) (b)
Ngun:(H 2011)

- Arbuscules: l th gic mt, lng phn, dng nh lng bn chi, l phn


trao i dinh dng chnh gia thc vt ch v nm (Gianinazzi et al. 2002).Chng
c hnh thnh bn trong tbo v r(Mosse and Hepper 1975b) v l du hiu
cho bit c hot ng ca mycorrhiza. Ty vo tng loi khc nhau m arbuscules
cng c nhng c trng ring v hnh dng v s phn nhnh.
- Vesicules: c dng hnh cu hoc trng, c thnh t bo dy, l c quan d
tr dinh dng cho nm, c cha lipit v glycolipit (Mosse and Thompson 1981a).
N c to thnh bi on gia hay u li tn cng ca si nm ni bo, phn
b trong khong gian bo hoc bn trong t bo v r.
- Si nm ni bo: si nm ni bo khng c vch ngn,dng thng hoc phn
nhnh hnh ch H hoc Y,chng cng hnh thnh dng cun, tn s xut hin ca
chng ph thuc vo v tr trong r v c im ca tng loi nm (Morton2000).
Si nm va l phn cha cht d tr va l mt phn ca con ng vn chuyn
cc cht hp th bi cc si nm bn ngoi t t ti arbuscules hoc trc tip ti
t bo r ca cy ch (Bieleski 1973).

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Nhm cu trc ngoi bo:

b
Hinh 1.3: a: Si nm ngoai bao (extraradical hyphae)
b: Bao t (spores)
Ngun: (H 2011)

- Si nm ngoi bo:Si nm ngoi bo khng c vch ngn, vai tr lm tng


r rt din tch hp th ca r cy (Bieleski 1973), cu si nm hnh thnh con
ng vn chuyn cht dinh dng gia thc vt cng sinh v khi t bm quanh
r (Koske and Gemma 1989). Si nm ngoi bo to ra ch c ng quan trng ca
h nm r (Jasper et al. 1989, 1991).
- Bo t:Bo t c th dng n hoc a bo, ch yu hnh thnh u ca
si sinh bo t ni tip vi si nm ngoi bo, i khi bo t cng xut hin bn
trong r (Koske et al. 1985), trn b mt t (BeCard and Fortin 1988), trn b mt
thc vt hay cc mnh phn gii (Blaszkowski et al. 1998). S lng bo t hnh
thnh ph thuc vo tng loi nm (Blaszkowski, 1993), loi cy ch v tnh a
dng ca n (Blaszkowski1993; Hetrick and Bloom1986), mu m ca t v
ch phn bn (Koske et al. 1989), c im vt hu ca cy ch (Giovannetti
and Avio 2002), cng nh sng (Daft and El Giahmi 1978), v kh nng cnh
tranh ca tng loi nm (Koske et al. 1989). Bo t c kch thc tng i ln
(50 500 m), ln hn nhiu so vi bo t ca nhng loi nm khc. Vai tr ca
bo t l pht tn n ni sng mi, v khi u qu trnh sinh trng khi c
tch ra t c th m. Do cim cu trc cc thnh phn cu to nn bo t n

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

nh trong nhng iu kin sinh thi khc nhau nn chng c coi l tiu ch quan
trng trong phn loi AM.

Hnh 1.4: S cu truc AM in hnh


(Bao gm arbuscules, vesicles, si nm ngoi bo v bo t)
(Ngun: http://mycorrhizas.info/vam/vamsoil2.gif)

c. Sinh trng
AM l th cng sinh bt buc. AM c th tn ti mt thi gian di trong t,
thm ch khi t b hn hay bng gi di dng cc mnh si nm trong cc r cht
hoc t do trong t. Tuy nhin, sinh trng c trong mt thi gian di AM
cn c cy ch thu nhn cacbon v nng lng cn thit. Do c im ny m
khng th tin hnh nui cy AM trc tip trn mi trng nhn to m cn phi
c gi th l r ca thc vt bc cao.
d. Chu trnh sinh sn v vng i
Khng c chng liu v s sinh sn hu tnh ca AM. Nghin cu bng ch
th phn t xc nh khng c s ti t hp hoc mc rt thp (Kuhn et al.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

2001). V th thng gi nh rng bo t c hnh thnh bng sinh sn v tnh


bng bo t hoc si nm.
Phng thc nay mm cua bo t: Trong nhng iu kin nhit thi ch hp ,
bo t AM s ny mm trong t , trn r cy chu , hnh thnh si nm to mng
li h si phn b trong t va n su vao r cy chu . Bo t c th to ra h si
nm bn trong cung nh bn ngoai r.
Sinh san bng si nm: Nhiu loai AM co th nhn ln t manh si nm trong
t hoc trc tip t th cng sinh trn r cy
. c im ca nm r ni cng sinh AM
l th cng sinh bt buc vi r cy ch, do o nu khng co r cy chu cho cac si
nm nay mm va cng sinh thi sinh trng cua nm se bi ngng tr lai sau mt thi
gian va t bao cht co th co lai bn trong bao t
.
Phng thc nui cy: nui cy nm r ni cng sinh AM , c th s dng
hai phng thc nui cy , o la : nui cy in vitro v in vivo. i vi nui cy in
vivo, c th nui cy trong chu bng t hin trng c cha bo t hay si nm
(Bianciotto va cng s , 2000; Hijri va cng s , 2002). Cn i vi nui cy in
vitro, c th to ra mt s lng ln nm r thng qua nui cy m r trn mi
trng nui cy nhn tao (Fortin et al. 2002). c bit l trong nui cy m r, sinh
khi nm r tao ra thng khng cha tap cht va cac vi sinh vt khac nn phng
php ny c s dng nhiu.
1.1.3. Vai tr ca nm r ni cng sinh vi cy ch
Nm r l th sng cng sinh bt buc. Nhng hot ng ca nm cng nh
ca thc vt c vai tr h tr cho nhau. Nm s dng ngun cacbon t thc vt
di dng ng hexoses v cc vitamin. S vn chuyn cacbon t thc vt sang
nm c thc hin nh arbuscules hoc cc si nm ni bo. Ti cc si nm ni
bo din ra qu trnh bin i dinh dng th cp cung cp glycogen, pentose,
lipit cho hot ng ca nm (Turmel 2004). Gn 20% cacbon do thc vt tng
hp c chuyn sang nm v khong 25% cacbon ngun gc t thc vt c
nm bin i v d tr nhng si nm ngoi bo, vic ny gp phn lm tng
thm ngun hu c trong t.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Li ch ca AM i vi thc vt ch yu l tng cng ci thin hp th cc


cht dinh dng v nc, trong quan trng nht l tng cng hp th dinh
dng ln (P), hp th nc, chng chu vi cc yu t bt li ca mi trng, c
bit trn cc hin trng t ai cn ci, kh hn. Hot ng ny c tng cng
l do nm r ni cng sinh hnh thnh nhiu h si nm phn nhnh mnh to
thnh v s cu ni gia mi trng t vi cc t bo r, tng din tch tip xc
vi t, bin i mi trng quanh r lm cho cc cht tr nn linh ng v thc
vt c th hp th c (n 80% nhu cu v P v 25% nhu cu v N ca cy c
cung cp nh nm) (Turmel 2004). Si nm c th lan rng n 8cm quanh r v
hp th cht dinh dng vn chuyn li vo r, tng kh nng hp th cc cht dinh
dng cao hn so vi lng r 10 ln. Tc thm nhp ca P qua si nm cao gp
6 ln so vi qua cc lng r.
Khng nhng th, thc vt cn c hng li nh c tng cng kh
nng hp th nc v bo v r khi ngun bnh. AM c vai tr kch thch sinh
trng thc vt bng cch tit ra rt nhiu cc cht kch thch sinh trng nh
auxins, cytokinins, gibberellic acids v mt s cht khng sinh bo v cy ch
chng li cc mm bnh t trong t.
S cng sinh AM c th lm tng cng sinh trng ca cy con ln n
400%, gip cy c kh nng chng chu vi iu kin kh hn v ngho dinh
dng (Pope 2007). Thc t nhng loi g ln c cng sinh AM cho thy cy
vn tn ti v sinh trng trong iu kin m rt thp trong khi nhng cy
khng c cng sinh th khng sng c hoc sinh trng yu. Kt qu nghin cu
cng cho thy, sinh trng ca cy con nhng loi g ln c s cng sinh AM t
ngang vi cy khng c s cng sinh nhng chng ch s dng lng dinh dng
bng mt na. Nhng loi sng ph thuc vo AM ch yu l nhng ni t
cht, kh cn, c h r t phn nhnh v lc lng cht dinh dng tn ti nhiu
dng kh tiu, r cy khng th hp th c m phi nh n s lan rng ca h
si nm.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Hnh 1.5. Cy Medicago truncatula pht trin bnh thng (a)


Cy Medicago truncatula c cng sinh nm r (b)
Ngun:(Lan 2011)

Nm AM khng phi l mt thnh phn chnh trong t nhng c vai tr


quan trng trong s iu chnh hot tnh sinh hc ca t nh s phn b rng
khp ca h si nm AM trong lp t tng mt. Nm AM hp th trc tip hp
cht carbon do cy c nh v cu thnh u vo chnh ca carbon v nng lng
trong t, chng phn phi carbon ny khp c khu vc t quanh r cy cho vi
sinh vt t s dng. Lng cacbon ng k c vn chuyn bng h si nm t
cy ny sang cy khc c xc nh (Simard et al. 1997). iu ny gip gim
s cnh tranh gia cc loi khc nhau v gp phn vo tnh n nh v a dng ca
h sinh thi.
AM tham gia vo bin i mi quan h t- cy- nc, tng cng s thch
nghi ca thc vt vi cc iu kin bt li (kh hn, nhim kim loi). nhng ni
c hm lng kim loi nng cao, AM c vai tr kh c mi trng gip cy sinh
trng tt (Songul and Sevinc 2002).Bt u t ci thin hp th nc v cc cht
dinh dng quan trng cho s sinh trng ca cy s dn ti tng hiu sut quang
hp, s vn chuyn cht dinh dng v s trao i cht ca cy. Cy sinh trng
nhanh, gim bt vic s dng phn bn ha hc (i khi ln ti mt na lng d
kin) dn ti tng thu nhp cho nng dn. Kt qu th nghim phn bn sinh hc
mycorrhiza trn cy Asparagus chng minh c iu , khi nhng nng dn
s dng lng phn bn ha hc cng vi phn bn sinh hc mycorrhiza th nng
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

sut cy trng c ci thin hn 50% v thu nhp ca nng dn tng 61% so vi


khi s dng ch mi phn bn ha hc.
1.2. Tng quan v vi khun Agrobacterium rhizogenses
Vi khun Agrobacterium rhizogenses ln u tin c pht hin cch y
hn 70 nm (Riker et al. 1930, Hildebrand 1934, White 1972) nh mt yu t gy
nn bnh lng r (hairy-root disease) mt s thc vt. A. rhizogenses thuc
Chi Agrobacterium, l vi khun t, gram m, c hnh que. A. rhizogenses c quan
h gn gi vi vi khun A. tumefaciens, mt loi vi khun c bit nhiu n v
gy nn bnh u biu thc vt (crown gall disease) rt ph bin (Conn 1942).
C ch nhim thng qua qu trnh tip xc, vi khun A. rhizogenses chuyn
mt on T-DNA, trong c mang cc gen lin quan n to lng r(rol-genes),
gen lin quan ti qu trnh sinh tng hp v c cc gen cha xc nh c chc
nng trong vng Ri- Plasmid ca chng vo b gen ca t bo thc vt ch; cc
gen (rol-genes) trong T-DNA tng tc vi gen ca thc vt ch to ra lng r.
Cc biu hin gen c cha cc thng tin c m ha trong T-DNA ny thc
y qu trnh pht trin v sn xut ra lng r vi hu ht cc thc vt hai l mm
(Veena and Taylor 2007) (Hnh 1.6). Qu trnh chuyn cc gen (rol-genes) trong TDNA t vi khun A. rhizogenses sang thc vt ch c th c xy ra ngu nhin,
cng c th c thc hin bng cc k thut ng nui cy n gin vi cc
chng A. rhizogenses hoang di t nhin (Abdoulaye 2003, Chabaud et al. 2006),
v cng c th thc hin bng k thut bin np gen hin i (Pak et al. 2009, Park
et al. 2011).
Vi khun A. rhizogenses tip cn chuyn gen T-DNA sang thc vt ch
thng qua cc vt thng, cc hp cht phenolic tit ra t cc vt thng ca t
bo thc vt hp dn A. rhizogenses, sau qu trnh nhim l qu trnh hp nht
cc nguyn liu di truyn T-DNA ca A. rhizogenses vi h gen thc vt ch, v
kt qu to nn bnh lng r (Veena and Taylor 2007). V hnh thi hc, lng r
to ra do vi khun A. rhizogenes c hnh dng v cu trc rt ging vi cc loi r
thng thng, tuy nhin n c nhng tnh trng rt c trng, d dng nhn bit l:
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

tc r di, sinh khi r ln, phn nhnh nhiu, tc r pht trin nghing v khng
c tnh hng t (negative geotropism)
Bnh lng r t vi khun A. rhizogenses c nghin cu p dng rng ri
nh mt cng c hu hiu cho cc nghin cu trao i cht th cp, chc nng
gen, cng sinh vi khun c nh m rhizobium, nm r ni cng sinh AM
(Abuscular mycorhizae), v cc c tnh sinh hc r thc vt khc (Tsuro et al.
2005, Chabaud et al. 2006, Veena and Taylor 2007, Sidwa-Gorycka et al. 2009,
Park et al. 2011).

Hnh 1.6:Cu trc vng Ri-plasmids ca vi khun A. rhizogenes


(Veena and Taylor 2007)
1.3. Nghin cu nm r ni cng sinh trn Th gii v Vit Nam
1.3.1. Trn Th gii
Giai on u, cc nghin cu v AM trn th gii tp trung cc mt: a
dng sinh hc ca cc chng bn a, phn loi, chn lc cc chng hiu lc vi
tng i tng cy trng v t trng khc nhau, ng thi pht trin nhng
phng php nh lng v nhn nhanh chng. Phng php nhn sn xut cht
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

nhim AM truyn thng l s dng cc thc vt ch (trap plant) nhn AM trong


nh knh, vn m t h r ca chng trn cc gi th gy trng khc nhau (in
vivo). Bng phng php ny, cht nhim AM thu c cn c gi l soil
innoculum dng th, thng c sch AM khng cao, s lng, cht lng
AM (IP- infective propagules) v hiu qu p dng cn b hn ch. Vn t ra l
cn c mt cng ngh cao hn, hiu qu hn c th nhn sinh khi ln, sn xut
ch phm cht nhim AM thun khit, cht lng v c hiu qu p dng cao cho
tng sinh trng, cht lng sn phm cy trng v bo v mi trng t. Trong
cng ngh ny, chng ta cn phi ch ti mt c tnh quan trng ca nm r ni
cng sinh AM, l, trong bt k iu kin nui cy no, bn ngoi mi trng
t (in vivo) hay trong iu kin nui cy v trng (invitro), sinh khi ca chng
ch c th c nhn ln khi hnh thnh c cng sinh vi t bo v r ca cc
thc vt ch. Do , vic s dng mi trng dinh dng nhn to khng c gi
th m r khng p ng c nhu cu sinh trng, pht trin ca AM (Roger et
al. 2004b).
Nghin cu v AM thng xuyn b cn tr bi c tnh cng sinh bt buc
ca chng (Bago and Bcard 2002). Mt hng nghin cu mi l, nui cy in
vitro pht huy c rt nhiu li th, n cho php nghin cu c c bn
nhng c tnh sinh l ca s cng sinh nm-r. Nhng nghin cu th nghim
u tin c tin hnh, c th k n nh (Mosse and Hepper 1975a). Sau
c b sung bi (Fortin et al. 2002)(Declerck et al. 2005).
Trong nhng nm 1980, s pht trin cng ngh nui cy m r m ra
mt hng i mi, cho php nui cy thnh cng mt s chng AM trong iu
kin in vitro. S dng phng php ny, nm AM v r cy c nhn ln ng
thi v nhanh chng qua mt s ln cy chuyn, thi gian c rt ngn rt nhiu
v m bo c thun khit cao (Fortin et al. 1996b).
Hai loi mi trng c s dng thng xuyn nht trong nui cy AM in
vitro l mi trng M(BeCard and Fortin 1988) v mi trng MSR (Strullu and
Romand 1986, Declerck et al. 1998). C hai loi mi trng ny u c cha cc
nguyn t a lng, vi lng, vitamin v ng (Cranenbrouck et al. 2005). ng
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

thi, chng c th c lm rn bi hp cht Agargel hoc Phytagel. Nm 2006,


nhm nghin cu ca Gadkar v cng s (Gadkar et al. 2006) tin hnh nui cy
AM trn mi trng M lng bng phng php chia ngn. Theo , mt ngn ca a
petri nui cy nm c cung cp thm ng, ngn cn li khng c ng cng nh
vitamin. Ging nh trong phng php nui cy in vivo, vic cung cp y xi cho
mi trng lng l vic lm cn thit trong nui cy in vitro(Jolicoeur et al. 1999).
Tuy nhin, mt vi nghin cu ch ra rng, mi trng MSR (Strullu and
Romand 1986, Declerck et al. 1998) l mi trng c bin i thnh phn vi
mc ch ti u ha cho s pht trin ca nm r trong iu kin in vitro. Trong ,
thnh phn a lng ca MSR l tng t trong mi trng M (Minimal medium).
S khc nhau gia hai loi mi trng ny l thnh phn vitamin: MSR va thiu
it, myo-inositol v glycin cn trong thnh phn vitamin ca mi trng M thiu
panthotenate, biotin v cyanocobalamine. Tuy nhin, nghin cu cng ch ra rng,
s vng mt ca nhng thnh phn ny khng c hiu qu tiu cc r rt n s
cng sinh AM.
Trong nhng nm 2000, rt nhiu nghin cu v cng ngh nui cy AM in
vitro c tin hnh trn mi trng MSR (Strullu and Romand 1986, Declerck et
al. 1998) khng b sung ng v vitamin (Voets et al. 2005a)(De Boulois et al.
2006)v c lm rn bi Phytagel hoc Agargel. Nghin cu ch ra rng, vic
b sung ng v vitamin l khng cn thit trong h thng nui in vitro v thc
vt c kh nng t quang hp to ng v chuyn ha vitamin cn thit cho s
pht trin ca chng. Nghin cu ca (Declerck et al. 2009) cng s dng MSR m
khng c ng v vitamin.
Nm 1996, St-Arnaud v cng s (St-Arnaud et al. 1996) ln u tin s
dng phng php chia ngn. Trong phng php ny, a petri c chia thnh
hai ngn ring bit, mt ngn c cha gi th r, ngn cn li ch c AM pht trin.
S dng phng php phn chia a, (Douds 2002a) chng minh c rng, bo
t AM tip tc c hnh thnh sau khi c s b sung mi trng c ng t
ngn cha gi th r.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Vic nghin cu v AM c thc hin bi rt nhiu nh khoa hc, c th


k n nh (Chabot et al. 1992)(Declerck et al. 2001)(Douds 2002b)(St-Arnaud et
al. 1996). Gi th u tin c s dng cho nui cy ny l r C rt. Tuy nhin,
trong nhng nm gn y, nhiu loi gi th khc nhau c a vo s dng
thnh cng nh Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) v Medicago(Medicago truncatula
Gaertn)(Boisson-Dernier et al. 2001)(Fontaine et al. 2004). Tuy nhin, vic s
dng cc loi gi th khc nhau c nh hng khc nhau n vic sn sinh bo t
AM (Tiwari and Adholeya 2003). Voets v cng s, 2005 (Voets et al. 2005b)
nghin cu s dng gi th l r cy khoai ty (Solanum tuberosum L.) v thu c
gn 12.000 bo t/ a petri sau 12 tun nui cy. Gn y, mt kt qu nghin cu
khc thu c gn 50.000 bo t/a petri khi cng sinh gia chng G.
intraradices (MUCL 41.833) vi r cy Medicago sau 14 tun nui cy. Mt s gi
th khc nh chui (Koffi et al. 2009) hay nho cng c kh nng cng sinh vi AM
nhng khng p ng c nhu cu p dng sn xut bo t trn quy m ln.
Nm 1996, Fortin v cng s (Fortin et al. 1996a) trnh by phng php
nui cy AM in vitro s dng 2 ngun nguyn liu l r c chuyn gen RitDNA hoc cha c chuyn gen. Phng php chn cy ch, k thut cng sinh
r AM, thnh phn mi trng nui cy. Nghin cu cng ng thi trnh by kh
nng nui cy v to bo t lin tc trong mi trng in vitro, phng php bo
qun bo t trong thi gian di. Nhng li ch khi nui cy AM in vitro, cho php
pht trin nghin cu su v rng hn nh hnh thi AM, phn loi v tm hiu c
ch cng sinh vi r.
Trong nghin cu nhn sinh khi r c mang Ri-plasmid ca vi khun
Agrobacterium rhizogenes, nhm tc gi (Mugnier and Mosse 1987) quan st
thy c s hnh thnh nhiu lng r trong mi trng nhn to v thc y c s
cho nhn sinh khi AM in vitro. Tc gi quan st thy s cng sinh hnh thnh
gia AM v r chuyn gen khi nui cy cng vi bo t Glomus mosseae. Tuy
nhin c s sinh trng gii hn v chu trnh sinh trng pht trin hon chnh
ca AM trong mi trng in vitro cha c hon thin. Trong nhiu nghin cu
sau , cc nhm tc gi nghin cu AM in vitro theo nhiu hng khc nhau
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

nhm tm ra iu kin thu hi c sinh khi AM cht lng nhiu nht trong
thi gian ngn nht. Cc nghin cu bao gm thnh phn mi trng nui cy,
phng thc cng sinh, phng thc nui cy, phng thc thu hi AM Mt
trong nhng kt qu ni bt c th k n l (Fortin et al. 1996b) thu hi c
30.000 bo t sau 6 tun nui cy AM in vitro qua r C rt c chuyn gen Ri trn
a petri v thu hi c 120.000 bo t AM sau 2 thng nui cy bng bioreator.
y l kt qu ht sc c ngha pht trin v hon thin cng ngh nhn
nhanh AM in vitro.
(Jolicoeur et al. 1999) cng b sn sut ch phm t loi Glomus
intraradices bng bioreactor. Bng phng php nui cy Glomus intraradices vi
r cy C rt c chuyn gen Ri-tDNA ca vi khun Agrobacterium rhizogenes
trn a petri v bioreactor cho kt qu tng sinh khi AM cc i t ~ 0,6g
sinh khi kh trong 1lt mi trng, khi pht trin qu gi tr sinh trng ca r
s b suy gim. Trong iu kin ti thch nui cy trn a petri, tc sinh trng
r ti a v bo t G. intraradices ln lt l 0,021 v 0,035/ngy. Nghin cu
bc u nhn sinh khi AM trong bioreactor lun chuyn kh cho kt qu thp
hn so vi nui cy trn a petri 10 ln v cng thy s hnh thnh cng sinh t
hn (0,13g sinh khi kh trong 1 lt mi trng). Kt qu nghin cu m ra kh
nng nhn nhanh bo t AM bng bioreactor.
Gn y, thng 1 nm 2009, nhm tc gi Venter, Marianne, Wilma bo
co kt qu nghin cu trnh by thng tin kh y v ton din v nhn sinh
khi AMin vitro,bao gm: phng php to cng sinh AM, nhn sinh khi bo t
AM trong mi trng in vitro, cc bc phn lp bo t t mi trng nui cy.
Nghin cu cng to ra ht bo t c nhiu c im u tri nh mt bo t
cao, c tnh n nh v phn tn tt trong mi trng t. Ht bo t c th p
dng trong sn xut nng lm nghip nh mt loi ch phm c th dng trc tip.
Nghin cu cng cp n mt s thnh phn c th b sung vo ht bo t lm
tng tc dng hin trng nh cht kch thch sinh trng, cc cht trao i th
cp.
Cng ngh nhn sinh khi AMinvitro v ch phm AM tinh khit ca Vin
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Nng lng v Ti nguyn (TERI), n l mt bc t ph cng ngh quan


trng trong lch s nghin cu AM trn th gii, mang li c hi p dng ln
hn v hiu qu hn. Cng ngh AM in vitro c TERI chuyn giao p dng
ti 5 nc khc trn th gii, hiu qu cho gy trng nhiu loi cy nng lm
nghip, trong c Cc ro, c bit hiu qu cho cc vng sinh thi suy thoi
nghim trng nh vng ct kh cn, bi thi khai thc v vng nhim cht
thi(Adholeya and Singh 2006).
Trong nghin cu nm r ni cng sinh AM in vitro, m r C rt (Daucus
carrota L.) chuyn gen Ri-tDNA c s dng kh ph bin v hiu qu cho cc
nghin cu cng sinh AM in vitro, sn xut sinh khi AM invitro v sn xut ch
phm AM (Declerck et al. 1996, Douds Jr 1997, Abdoulaye 2003, Ijdo et al.
2011).
Mc d, hin nay, phng php nui cy AM in vitro vn cn mt vi hn
ch nh vic cn u t kh tn km v nhn lc cng nh trang thit b phc v
cho nghin cu nhng vi nhng u th ca n, c bit l vic c th kim sot
cht lng ch phm AM cng nh gim nguy c nhim th trong tng lai, y
s l mt hng i mi c kh nng p ng c tiu chun cht lng cho sn
xut thng mi hng lot.
Trong nhng thp k qua, c rt nhiu cng trnh nghin cu v AM theo
c chiu rng ln chiu su. Vi hn 40 bng sng ch lin quan n AM, trong
c nghin cu v nhng c tnh c li ca AM. Mt s nghin cu li tp trung
vo k thut nui cy (Sylvia and Jarstfer 1992), mt s khc nghin cu cc ng
dng ca n (Cano and Bago 2007)(Fernandez et al. 2006), v phng php nui
cy trn cc loi gi th khc nhau (Mosse and Thompson 1981b) hoc nui cy
trong iu kin in vitro(Declerck et al. 1996)(Cranenbrouck et al. 2005)(Declerck
et al. 2009)(Fortin et al. 1996b)(Mugnier et al. 1986)(Wang 2003).
Hin nay trn th gii, nghin cu pht trin cng ngh AM cho mc tiu
phc v cy trng nng lm nghip, lm tng sinh trng, nng sut v cht lng
sn phm cng nh phc v cc mc tiu lm sch mi trng, gp phn lm cn
bng n nh cc h sinh thi ang ngy cng c quan tm u t nhiu hn v
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

mi kha cnh, nghin cu chuyn su v m rng lnh vc p dng cng ngh v


sn phm. Nhiu trung tm nghin cu ln v AM trn th gii c thnh lp
tip tc pht trin v ng dng khng ch nhng sn phm AM m cn c nhng
gii php cng ngh cho thc tin sn xut, cc h sinh thi v mi trng sng.
Mt s trung tm ln c th k n nh INVAM (M), GINCO (Canada),
CESAMM (B), Mycorrhiza Association (c), TERI (n ), ACT (i Loan)
v.v.
1.3.2. Trong nc
ng dng nm r ngoi cng sinh Ectomycorrhiza cho sn xut cy con thng
nha c nghin cu bng vic s dng t mn rng thng nh mt loi cht
nhim t nhin (natural soil innoculum) v tuyn chn sn xut cht nhim nhn
to (Giao and Nhm 1988). Tuy nhin, quy m & kt qu p dng cn rt hn ch.
L Quc Huy vi nghin cu k thut mycorrhiza cho lm nghip (Vin
nghin cu nng lng TATA, New Delhi - n , 1999)(Huy 1999) a ra
mt hng i mi cho nghin cu mycorrhiza Vit Nam
Nghin cu Ectomycorrhiza cho Bch n v Phi lao (Phm Quang Thu, Vin
Khoa hc Lm nghip Vit Nam, (Nguyn Vn Mo, Trng i hc Lm nghip)
c nhng kt qu bc u ng dng th nghim vn m v rng trng .Sn
xut ch phm nm cng sinh a chng chc nng cho cy Lm nghip (Phm
Quang Thu, 2001- 2004). ti nghin cu sn xut ch phm nm cng sinh
cho Thng v Bch n di dng bt cha bo t hu tnh ca nm Pisolithus
tinctorius v mt s vi sinh vt chc nng. Hiu qu ca ch phm khi nhim cho
bch n PN2 trng trn cc lp a thoi ho cho thy c s khc bit r rt so vi
i chng.Nghin cu cng ngh sn xut ch phm vi sinh hn hp dng vin nn
cho bch n v thng trn cc lp a thoi ho, ngho cht dinh dng(Thu
2006-2010).
Ch phm nm r ngoi cng sinh (ECM) dng vin nang (gel) c
nghin cu v p dng th nghim cho i tng cy Sao en (Hopea odorata),
nhm tng sinh trng, sn xut cy con Sao en cht lng cao cung cp cho
trng rng. Kt qu p dng lm tng sinh trng cy con sao en ti vn m
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

ln 50-80% so vi i chng. Tuy nhin, vn tn ti cn c tip tc nghin


cu gii quyt i vi ch phm ECM dng ny l t l sng st ca cc si
nm ECM trong vin Gel gim nhanh chng sau mt thi gian bo qun, v lm
sao bo qun cho s dng dng ch phm ny trong mt thi gian di, ti thiu
l 6 thng cng c t ra (Chu and Huy 2007).
Cc nghin cu trn ch yu tp trung nm r ngoi cng sinh
Ectomycorrhiza. Dotnh cht c bit ca Nm r ni cng sinh Abuscular
mycorrhiza (AM), vic nghin cu AM cn c phng php tip cn khc; cc
chng AM phn lp tuyn chn t mt i tng cy ch ny c kh nng ng
dng hiu qu cho nhiu loi cy trng khc, nghin cu v ng dng AM trong
lm nghip hin nay ti Vit Nam l mt i hi ht sc cn thit.
ti Nghin cu, p dng k thut pht trin cng sinh mycorhiza cho mt
s cy trng chnh ti mt s vng sinh thi phc v sn xut nng nghip bn
vng Vit Nam (Vin Th Nhng Nng Ho 2004 -2006) cho thy vai tr
ca cng sinh nm r cy khng ch thc y sinh trng m cn nh hng tt
n nng sut cy trng nng v lm nghip.
Nghin cu s a dng nm cng sinh Arbuscular mycorrhiza c Vetiver t
t nhim ch(Chnh and Cng 2007).
Nghin cu phng php nui cy dung dch lng (MS ci tin) in vitro Keo
lai v Keo tai tng (hay gi l phng php nui cy trn cu giy) nhm lm
ny mm bo t AM v xc tin qu trnh hnh thnh cng sinh AM trong r Keo
c tin hnh thnh cng(Huy and Chu 2004). Kt qu phng php l mt
c s quan trng cho th nghim pht trin phng php nui cy nhn nhanh sinh
khi AM in vitro v Bioreactor ci tin cho sn sut ch phm AM.
Nhng kt qu bc u v phn lp, tuyn chon cc chng AM cho sn xut
th ch phm in vivo v nghin cu nh gi nh hng ca bn nhim mt s loi
ch phm AM ti sinh trng v nng sut qu ht ca cy Cc ro ti vn m
v rng trng rt kh quan (thc hin ti Trung tm CNSH Lm nghip, Vin
Khoa hc Lm nghip Vit Nam). Ti vn m, khi p dng bn nhim ch
phm AM 25mg/cy (200IP) t c phn ng sinh trng cao nht ca cy con
Cc ro v ng knh (D), chiu cao (H) v sinh khi (P) sau 24 tun th nghim,
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

tng hn so vi i chng tng ng cho cc ch tiu l 18,8%, 27,4% v 63% (V


Qu ng, 2009).
Tng t, kt qu nh gi mc cng sinh AM trong t bo r cy Cc ro
vn m vi cc loi ch phm AM v cng thc nhim khc nhau c
nghin cu tin hnh ti Trung tm CNSH Lm nghip: cng thc FM1 25mg/cy
(200IP), loi ch phm AM in vitro ca TERI cho thy mc cng sinh AM - r
cao nht (F: 96,67%, v A: 39,79%, cao hn so vi i chng (F: 83,33% v A:
16,62%) (V Qu ng, 2009).
Kt qu p dng bn nhim ch phm AM cho Cc ro trng rng ti vng ct
kh hn Ninh Phc, Ninh Thun sau 01 nm trng lm tng nng sut ht
trung bnh t 25-35% so vi i chng khng bn nhim(Huy et al. 2009).
Tuy nhin nhng nghin cu v nm r ni cng sinh AM mi ch khi u,
cha c nhng nghin cu chuyn su v h thng v cng ngh ch phm AM in
vitro v do kt qu v s ng dng cn rt hn ch.Pht trin nghin cu ng
dng cng ngh AM trong nng lm nghip, phc v gy trng rng, qun l phc
hi sinh thi l mt hng i quan trng, ph hp vi nhng n lc pht trin trn
th gii.

Chng 2: VT LIU -NI DUNG - PHNG PHP NGHIN CU


S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

2.1. Vt liu nghin cu


- Ht C rt (Daucus carrota L.), ht Medicago (Medicago truncatula) c
s dng to vt liu m r in vitro khng c gen Ri-tDNA ti Trung tm Cng
ngh sinh hc Lm nghip, Vin Khoa hc Lm nghip Vit Nam.
- M r C rt (Daucus carrota L.)in vitro c nghin cu to ra ti Phng
th nghimCng ngh vi sinh v Sinh hc mi trng, Trung tm Cng ngh sinh
hc Lm nghip, Vin Khoa hc Lm nghip Vit Nam; trong khi m r
Medicago ( Medicago truncatula) in vitro c Ri-tDNA c cung cp t Phng th
nghim AM ca Trung tm CESSAM (Trung tm nghin cu Nm r ni cng
sinh in vitro, i hc Catholique, Louvain-la-Neuve, Vng quc B).
- Chng AM s dng cho nghin cu bao gm (i) chng 41833 (Glomus
intraradices)c cung cp t trung tm CESAMM (Trung tm nghin cu Nm
r ni cng sinh in vitro, i hc Catholique, Louvain-la-Neuve, Vng quc B),
trong bo co ny c gi tt l chng AM 41 (ii) chng M7 (Glomus sp.) l
chng bn a c phn lp, tuyn chn ti Phng th nghim Cng ngh vi sinh
v Sinh hc mi trng, Trung tm Cng ngh sinh hc Lm nghip, Vin Khoa
hc Lm nghip Vit Nam, trong bo co ny c gi tt l chng AM7.
- Chng AM s dng cho nghin cu bao gm (i) chng 41833 (Glomus
intraradices) c cung cp t trung tm CESAMM (Trung tm nghin cu Nm
r ni cng sinh in vitro, i hc Catholique, Louvain-la-Neuve, Vng quc B),
(ii) chng M7 (Glomus sp.) l chng bn a c phn lp, tuyn chn ti Phng
th nghim Cng ngh vi sinh v Sinh hc mi trng, Trung tm Cng ngh sinh
hc Lm nghip, Vin Khoa hc Lm nghip Vit Nam.
- Vi khun Agrobacterium rhizogenses: Chng A4 t Phng th nghim
CESAMM (Trung tm nghin cu Nm r ni cng sinh in vitro, i hc
Catholique, Louvain-la-Neuve, BELGIUM).

2.2. Ni dung nghin cu


S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

2.2.1. Nghin cu to vt liu gi th m r in vitro


- Nghin cu to vt liu gi th m r C rt (Daucus carrota L.) v
Medicago (Medicago truncatula) in vitro khng c gen Ri-tDNA.
- Nghin cu to vt liu m r C rt (Daucus carrota L.) in vitro c gen
Ri-tDNA.
2.2.2. nh gi nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n kh nng nhn sinh
khi cng sinh nm r AM in vitro
CTTN
CT1
CT2
CT3

Mi trng
MSR 0,5% agar
MSR lng (khng agar)
MS 0,5% agar

2.2.3. nh gi nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n kh nng nhn


sinh khi cng sinh nm r AM in vitro
CTTN
CT1
CT2
CT3

pH
5,0
5,5
6,0

2.2.4. nh gi nh hng ca gi th m r n kh nng nhn sinh khi cng


sinh nm r AM in vitro
CTTN
CT1.1
CT1.2
CT2.1
CT2.2

Loi gi th m r
M r C rt c gen Ri-tDNA
M r C rt khng gen
M r Medicago c gen Ri-tDNA
M r Medicago khng gen

2.3. Phng php nghin cu


S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

2.3.1.Phng php b tr th nghim


- Trong th nghim v nh gi nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n kh
nng nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro, s dng gi th l m r C rt v
Medicago c chuyn gen Ri-tDNA cng sinh vi chng 41833 v chng M7.
- Trong th nghim v nh gi nh hng ca pH mi trng n kh nng
nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro, s dng mi trng MSR 0,5% agar (l loi
mi trng c la chn vi mc ch ti u ha cho kh nng nhn sinh khi
cng sinh AM in vitro trong th nghim mc 2.2.2).
- Trong th nghim v nh gi nh hng ca gi th m r n kh nng
nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro, s dng mi trng nui cy l mi trng
MSR 0,5% agar, pH 5,5.
2.3.2. Phng php to vt liu m r in vitro
a. To vt liu m r khng chuyn gen Ri-tDNA(Abdoulaye 2003, Chabaud et al.
2006)

Hnh 2.1: Gieo ht Medicago (a)


R Medicago pht trin sau 5 ngy (b)
- Ht C rt v Medicago u c kh trng b mt bng cch ngm 15
pht trong cn etanol 700, sau ngm trong dung dch Sodium hypochlorite 5%
trong 30 pht, tip theo l ra k nhiu ln bng nc ct v trng.
- Ht v trng b mt c cy vo a thch 0,5% agar (5 g/lt; thc hin
trong bc cy v trng), 5-7 ht/a, y kn parafin v p ngc trong t m
270C v theo di ny mm trong thi gian 10 ngy.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

- Sau 7-10 ngy, ht ny mm vi on r di khong 3 - 5 cm, dng panh


v dao v trng ct on r (khong 3 - 4 t phn nhnh) v chuyn sang mi
trng MS (Murashige and Skook 1962)c b sung IBA (Indole butylic acid) vi
nng 1,5 ppm, cy chuyn v la chn c cc dng m r C rt v
Medicago in vitro thun, c sinh trng tt nht s dng cho cc th nghim
tip theo.
b. To vt liu m r chuyn gen Ri - tDNA
To m r invitro(Abdoulaye 2003, Chabaud et al. 2006):

Hnh 2.2: Ht C rt ny mm sau 7 ngy gieo ht (a)


Nhn r C rt (b)
- Ht C rt (Daucus carrota L.) c kh trng b mt bng cch ngm 15
pht trong cn etanol 700, sau ngm 30 pht trong dung dch Sodium
hypochlorite 5%; tip theo l ra k nhiu ln bng nc ct v trng.
- Ht C rt v trng b mt c cy vo a thch 0,5% agar (5 g/lt;
thc hin trong bc cy v trng), y kn, parafin v p ngc trong t m 270C
v ch ny mm trong 10 ngy.
- Sau khong 10 ngy, ht ny mm vi r tr khong 1 cm, dng panh v
dao v trng ct b u r (khong 2 mm) v chuyn sang cy nhim vi khun
Agrobacterium rhizogenseschng A4 bng cch ngm nhng v ph ton b b
mt r tr v vt ct vo dung dch vi khun A. rhizogense vi nng t bo 8
triu cfu/ml.
Chun b dung dch vi khun Agrobacterium rhizogensesChng A4
(Abdoulaye 2003, Chabaud et al. 2006):
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Vi khun Agrobacterium rhizogenses Chng A4c duy tr nui cy trn


mi trngTY/calcium [5g/l Bacto-tryptone, 3g/l Yeast extract, 6mM CaCl2 (c
b sung sau khi hp v trng); pH = 7,2; Agar 15g/l] . Sau 48 gi nui cy trn
mi trng TY/calcium, sinh khi khun lc A. rhizogenses c s dng cho cy
nhim m r invitro vi nng t bo l 8 triu cfu/ml.
Cy nhim, ng nui cy A. rhizogenses vi m r invitro v chuyn gen:
- S dng mi trng nui cy m r cy nhim A. Rhizogenses l mi
trng MS (Murashige and Skoog 1962) (a lng, vi lng, vitamin, khng cht
kch thch sinh trng thc vt) 0,5% agar (Park et al. 2011).
- Ht C rt ny mm vi r tr ct b tp r c ngm nhng trong sinh
khi khun lc A. rhizogenses (sau 48 gi nui cy) trong 5 - 7 pht, v c ph 1
lp vi khun, sau c cy chuyn vo mi trng trn nui cy trong t m
250C trong 48 gi (ti).
- Cy chuyn sang mi trng MS mi (0,5% agar), b sung khng sinh
carbenicillin (500 mg/lt) loi b vi khun A. rhizogenes v nui cy phng sinh
trng 200C, quang chu k l 16 gi trong 5 - 7 ngy.
- Theo di v chn la gi th m r c s hnh thnh pht trin lng r tt
sau khong 7 - 21 ngy.
Nui cy trn mi trng chn lc c khng sinh v to dng thun m r
invitro c Ri-tDNA:
- Sau 48 gi ng nui cy vi vi khun A. rhizogenses, chng A4 trong t
m 250C (ti), Cc m r C rt c cy chuyn sang mi trng MS mi (0,5%
agar), b sung khng sinh carbenicillin (500 mg/lt) loi b vi khun A.
rhizogenes cn li v nui cy phng sinh trng 20 - 250C, quang chu k l 16
gi: nh gi hiu qu loi b vi khun A. rhizogensesca khng sinh carbenicillin
bng phn tch PCR (polymerase chain reaction) (Sidwa-Gorycka et al. 2009).
- Cc m r hnh thnh v pht trin lng r tt nht, phn nhnh v nhiu
nht (du hiu hnh thi l c chuyn gen Ri-tDNA t vi khun A.
rhizogenses) c chn lc, ct v cy chuyn sang mi trng MS mi (0,5%
agar), b sung khng sinh carbenicillin (500 mg/lt) tip tc loi b vi khun A.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

rhizogenes v nui cy phng sinh trng 20 - 250C (ti) to cc dng thun


m r C rt invitro c Ri-tDNA (cy 1 m r 3cm/a petri) (Abdoulaye 2003,
Sidwa-Gorycka et al. 2009).
- Cc dng thun m r invitro c Ri-tDNA (khng cn vi khun A.
rhizogenes) sau c cy chuyn trn mi trng MSR (0,5% agar), nui duy
tr trong phng sinh trng hoc t m 270C v s dng lm gi th cho nghin
cu cng sinh AM (Abuscular mycorrhizae) invitro(Declerck et al. 1998, Ijdo et al.
2011).
Kim tra m r chuyn gen Ri-tDNA v hiu qu loi b vi khun A.
rhizogensesca khng sinh carbenicillin bng phn tch PCR (polymerase
chain reaction):
- Tch DNA t m r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA v r C rt khng
chuyn gen Ri-tDNA (i chng) bng kit tch chit GeneJET Plant Genomic
DNA Purification Mini Kit (Fermentas), cc bc thc hin theo hng dn ca
nh sn xut v c b sung 1% PVP vo Lysis Buffer.. DNA sau c in di
trn gen agarose 1% kim tra cht lng v c o trn my quang ph
NanoDrop ND1000 kim tra tinh sch ca mu. Phn ng PCR c thc
hin trn my lun nhit C1000 Thermal Cycler (BioRad). Thnh phn v chu
trnh nhit ca phn ng PCR c thc hin theo Krolicka et al. (2001). Tng th
tch cho mi phn ng l 20 l vi thnh phn bao gm 10 l PCR Master Mix
(Fermentas), 2 l mi mi (10 pmol), 2 l ca DNA (10 ng/l) v 6 l nc kh
ion v trng. Chu trnh nhit gm: 940C - 3 pht, sau lp li 35 chu k ca 940C
- 1 pht, 540C 1 pht. 720C 1 pht, cui cng l 720C 10 pht v lu 120C.
S

dng

cc

mi

5-GCTCTTGCAGTGCTAGATTT-3

5-

GAAGGTGCAAGCTACCTCTC-3 pht hin cc gen rolB v 5CTCCTGACATCAAACTCGTC-3v

5-TGCTTCGAGTTATGGGTACA-3

trong phn ng PCR pht hin cc gen rolC ca vi khun A. rhizogenses (c


trn on T-DNA) trong b gen ca m r C rt.
- Nhm khng nh cc m r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA hon ton sch vi
khun A. rhizogenes, phn ng PCR c tin hnh vi cc mi virG5S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

ACTGAATATCAGGCAACGCC-3v5-CGTCAAAGAAATAGCCAGC

(Aoyama et al. 1989) xc nh c hay khng cc gen virG (gen nm trn vng
Ri plasmid, ngoi tr on T-DNA) c chuyn sang m r: Chu trnh nhit gm:
940C - 3 pht, sau lp li 35 chu k ca 940C - 1 pht, 540C 1 pht. 720C 1
pht, cui cng l 720C 10 pht v lu 120C
2.3.3. Phng phpcy chuyn v nhn sinh khi m r
- R pht trin sau khong 15 ngy trn mi trng ph hp, tin hnh cy
chuyn nhn nhanh sinh khi r, cc bc tin hnh nh sau:
- t dng c trn ngn la n cn.
- Quan st bng knh hin vi chn la nhng a petri cha mu tt,
khng b nhim tp khun.
- nh du nhng on r cy chuyn ( mu trng hoc vng nht, c
phn nhnh cp 1 hoc 2, ng knh tri hn).
- Dng dao ct on r xc nh di khong 3-5 cm.
- Dng kp gp mnh r cy chuyn sang a petri c sn mi trng,
mi a petri cy 2 on r vi chiu ngc nhau.
- Bc kn bng parafilm.
- Ghi y thng tin trn a petri (loi mu, ngy/thng/nm cy chuyn).
- a vo t nui cy trong iu kin ti 270C.
- Thc hin cy chuyn nhiu ln trong bc cy v trng nhn sinh khi
m r to ngun vt liu a vo cng sinh vi AM.
2.3.4.Phng php to cng sinh AM in vitro
- Trn a thch cha mi trng, ct b mnh thch phn chnh gia a.
- Trn a thch cha vt liu AM v trng ny mm, ct ly AM sao cho
mnh nguyn liu nm trn bn trong phn thch loi b a mi trng.
Dng dao cn thn chuyn vt liu AM t va vo phn thch va loi b trn
mi trng MSR (the modified Strullu Romand) (Strullu and Romand 1986,
Declerck et al. 1998). Cy chuyn on r in vitro ln a thch cha AM sao cho
chiu hng pht trin ca r mi s chm si nm.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

- Nui cy trong iu kin thch hp, trong ti, 270C. Theo di tin trin
ca r, si nm, cng sinh v sinh bo t mi trn a cy.
2.3.5. Phng php nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro
Sau thi gian 4-5 thng, s dng ngun vt liu AM cng sinh vi r lm
nguyn liu AM v trng to cng sinh vi r in vitro trong bc tip theo vi mc
tiu nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro. Cc bc tin hnh nh sau:
- Trn a thch cha mi trng, ct b mnh thch phn chnh gia a.
- Trn a thch cha vt liu AM v trng ny mm, ct ly AM sao cho
mnh nguyn liu nm trn bn trong phn thch loi b a mi trng.
Dng dao cn thn chuyn vt liu AM t va vo phn thch va loi b trn
mi trng MSR (the modified Strullu Romand) (Strullu and Romand 1986,
Declerck, Stullu et al. 1998). Cy chuyn on r in vitro ln a thch cha AM
sao cho chiu hng pht trin ca r mi s chm si nm.
- Nui cy trong iu kin thch hp, trong ti, 270C. Theo di tin trin
ca r, si nm, cng sinh v sinh bo t mi trn a cy.
2.3.6. Phng php thu thp, phn tch v x l thng k s liu th nghim
a. Phng php thu thp s liu
S lng bo t (bt/a petri): m trc tip bng quan st trn knh hin vi
soi ni trn cc m c thit k sn, tng cc quan st bng 2/3 din tch a
petri, thu s lng bo t cc khong thi gian 1 thng, 2 thng, 3 thng, 4 thng
v 5 thng sau khi tin hnh cng sinh gi th r vi chng AM tng ng, trong
bo co ny cc khong thi gian trn c gi tt tng ng l T1, T2, T3, T4 v
T5.
b. Phng php x l s liu
Cc s liu thu c s c x l thng k bng phn mm SPSS 20. So snh
ngha khc bit cc gi tr trung bnh ca cc cng thc th nghim bng phn
tch ANOVA Post Hoc Multiple Comparison Test theo tiu chun Bonferroni v
Duncan nu phng sai bng nhau v Tamhanes T2 nu phng sai khng bng
nhau, p<0,05 c xem l c ngha.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Chng 3: KT QU V BN LUN
3.1. Kt qu to vt liu gi th m r in vitro

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

b
Hnh 3.1: R Ca rt khng c gen Ri-tDNA (a)
R Ca rt c gen Ri-tDNA (b)

Bng cc phng php th nghim v k thut kh trng b mt ht, k thut


nui cy trn mi trng thch agar, chng ti to c vt liu gi th r C
rt (Daucus carrota L.) v Medicago (Medicago truncatula) in vitro khng c gen
Ri-tDNA s dng cho cc nghin cu ca ti.
Bng k thut ng nui cy vi A. rhizogenes trn mi trng MS 0,5 % agar,
v sau mi trng MS 0,5 % b sung 500 mg Canbenicilin/lt chn lc v
loi b vi khun A. rhizogenes, chng ti nghin cu to c vt liu gi th r
C rt (Daucus carrota L.) in vitro chuyn gen Ri-tDNA hon ton sch khun.
Vt liu gi th r C rt (Daucus carrota L.) in vitro chuyn gen Ri-tDNA c
khng nh v mt di truyn bng phn ng PCR. Kt qu PCR xc nh trong b
gen ca cc gi th m r C rt invitro ny u pht hin thy c cc gen rolB v
rolC ca vi khun A. rhizogenses (c trn on T-DNA) cc v tr khong 380bp
(cho gen rolB) v 580bp (cho gen rolC) (Hnh 3.2), y l v tr biu hin s c
mt hay khng c mt ca 2 gen rolB v rolC trong cy chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
(Veena and Taylor 2007) cn trn cy i chng (khng chuyn gen) th khng
thy c s xut hin ca 2 gen ny. Nh vy v mt di truyn khng nh l cc
gi th m r C rt invitro ny c chuyn gen Ri-tDNA t vi khun A.
rhizogenes thng qua ng nui cy.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

580 bp
380 bp

Hnh 3.2: Phn tch PCR cho m r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA v khng chuyn
gen Ri-tDNA. Bng 1: c gen rolB; bng 2: c gen rolC (cho mu chuyn gen);
bng 3 va 4: khng c gen rolB va rolC (cho mu khng chuyn gen); M: DNA
thang chun 100 bp (Fermentas)

Hnh 3.3: R Medicago khng c gen Ri-tDNA (a)


R Medicago c gen Ri-tDNA (b)
3.2. nh gi nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng
sinh AM in vitro
Bng 3.1: nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM
in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
Cng thc

S lng bo t
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1

1809a 47

3453a 62

5057a 43

8938a 64

10363a 77

CT2

147b 8

263b 6

330b 10

402b 3

636b 8

CT3

644c 9

1226c 14

1465c 24

1805c 8

2021c 17

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gian c ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
CT1: MSR 0,5% agar

CT2: MSR lngCT3: MS 0,5% agar

T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.1 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

nht thu c l CT1. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc


thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo
t t cao nht CT1 (trung bnh t 10363 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT3 (2021
bo t/petri) v thp nht CT2 (ch t trung bnh 636 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1, CT2 v CT3 khc bit c ngha (=0,05) trong tt c cc thng
th nghim t T1 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t th nghim mi trng
nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng 41833

S lng bo t/dia petri

cng sinh vi gi th r C rt c gen Ri-tDNA.


10363

12000
10000
8000
6000

2021

4000
636

2000
0
CT1

CT2

CT3

C rt - 41833

Biu 3.1:nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM
in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
Bng 3.2:nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in
vitro gia chng M7 vi gi th r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
S lng bo t
Cng thc
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1

2061a 45

4031a 8

7055a 12

9238a 31

9948a 31

CT2

120c 3

252c 3

308c 6

493c 13

575c 14

CT3

722b 5

1245b 32

1455b 18

1804b 8

2049b 40

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
CT1: MSR 0,5% agar

CT2: MSR lng

CT3: MS 0,5% agar

T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.2 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
nht thu c l CT1. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc
thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo
t t cao nht CT1 (trung bnh t 9948 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT3 (2049
bo t/petri) v thp nht CT2 (ch t trung bnh 575 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1, CT2 v CT3 khc bit c ngha (=0,05) trong tt c cc thng
th nghim t T1 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t th nghim mi trng
nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng M7
cng sinh vi gi th r C rt c gen Ri-tDNA.
S lng bo t/dia petri

9948
10000
8000
6000
4000

2049
575

2000
0
CT1

CT2

CT3

C rt - M7

Biu 3.2:nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM
in vitro gia chng M7 vi gi th r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
Bng 3.3:nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in
vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
S lng bo t
Cng thc
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1

1632a 11

3354a 25

4025a 52

7110a 16

8271a 12

CT2

81c 5

169c 5

217c 5

288c 6

407c 6

CT3

408b 6

1056b 36

1250b 12

1411b 8

1740b 6

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
CT1: MSR 0,5% agar

CT2: MSR lng

CT3: MS 0,5% agar

T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

S lng bo t/petri

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.3 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
nht thu c l CT1. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc
thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo
t t cao nht CT1 (trung bnh t 8271 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT3 (1740
bo t/petri) v thp nht CT2 (ch t trung bnh 407 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1, CT2 v CT3 khc bit c ngha (=0,05) trong tt c cc thng
th nghim t T1 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t th nghim mi trng
nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng 41833
cng sinh vi gi th r Medicago c gen Ri-tDNA.
8271
10000
8000
6000
4000

1740
407

2000
0
CT1

CT2

CT3

Medicago - 41833

Biu 3.3:nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM
in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
Bng 3.4:nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in
vitro gia chng M7 vi gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
S lng bo t
Cng thc
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1

1949a 23

3656a 39

5873a 74

8266a 75

9229a 29

CT2

104c 3

218c 6

254c 6

406c 7

457c 6

CT3

548b 8

1123b 4

1356b 13

1704b 12

1827b 10

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
CT1: MSR 0,5% agar

CT2: MSR lng

CT3: MS 0,5% agar

T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.4 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
nht thu c l CT1. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc
thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo
t t cao nht CT1 (trung bnh t 9229 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT3 (1827
bo t/petri) v thp nht CT2 (ch t trung bnh 457 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1, CT2 v CT3 khc bit c ngha (=0,05) trong tt c cc thng
th nghim t T1 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t th nghim mi trng
nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng M7
cng sinh vi gi th r Medicago c gen Ri-tDNA.

10000

9229

S lng bo t/ petri

9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
1827

3000
2000

457

1000
0
CT1

CT2

CT3

Medicago - M7

Biu 3.4:nh hng ca mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM
in vitro gia chng M7 vi gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Hnh3.4: R cng sinh pht trin trn mi trng MSR c (a), trn mi trng
MSR lng (b), trn mi trng MS c (c)
Kt qu s lng bo t thu c trong th nghim mi trng sau 5 thng
tin hnh th nghim trn 4 loi gi th C rt-41833, C rt-M7, Medicago-41833,
Medicago-M7 tng ng vi nhng kt qu nghin cu trc y (Declerck,
DOr et al. 2001) v mi trng nui cy AM in vitro. Kt qu CT1 cho thy,
mi trng MSR c b sung 0,5% agar ph hp hn cho nui cy AM so vi mi
trng cng loi MSR lng bi AM cn c s c nh tt pht trin, so vi mi
trng MS, thnh phn dinh dng trong MSR c bin i vi mc ch ti
u ha cho s pht trin ca AM, hn ch mt s cht gy c ch s cng sinh.
Mi trng MS tt cho s sinh trng ca r, do gim s ph thuc ca r vo
quan h cng sinh vi AM, t lm gim mc cng sinh nm - r. Trong
nghin cu ny, chng ti cn la chn c loi mi trng ti u cho kh nng
nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM. V vy, mi trng MSR c b sung 0,5% agar l
loi mi trng c la chn v s dng cho nhng th nghim nghin cu tip
theo.
Mt s nghin cu ch ra rng, s dng mi trng MSR khng c ng
cho kt qu cng sinh AM tt hn khi s dng mi trng MSR c b sung ng
(Ijdo, Cranenbrouck et al. 2011). Tuy nhin, trong phng php ny, Ijdo v cng
s s dng a petri c cu trc 2 ngn, trong , mt ngn c b sung ng
cung cp dinh dng cho gi th r pht trin, ngn cn li l mi trng khng
ng cho s pht trin ca nm, ng thi c s b sung mi trng theo tng
t. Vic p dng phng php ny cn hn ch Vit Nam do vn v vic cn
u t trang thit b rt tn km v yu cu cao v cng ngh. Do vy, kt qu
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

nghin cu ca chng ti l ph hp vi vic tip cn nghin cu theo hng k


thut n gin.
3.3. nh gi nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng
sinh AM in vitro
Bng 3.5:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th rC rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
S lng bo t
Cng thc
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1

1108b 25

2127c 20

3147c 14

4216c 17

5412c 7

CT2

1809a 47

3453a 60

5057a 43

8938a 64

10363a 78

CT3

1025b 8

2523b 18

4357b 31

6164b 71

7138b 14

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
CT1: pH = 5,0 CT2: pH = 5,5CT3: pH = 6,0
T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.5 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
nht thu c l CT2. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc
thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo
t t cao nht CT2 (trung bnh t 10363 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT3 (7138
bo t/petri) v thp nht CT1(ch t trung bnh 5412 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1v CT2 , gia CT2 v CT3 khc bit c ngha (=0,05) trong tt
c cc thng th nghim t T1 n T5. S khc bit c ngha gia CT1 v CT3
xy ra t T2 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t th nghim pH mi trng
nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng 41833
cng sinh vi gi th r C rt c gen Ri-tDNA.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

S lng bo t/petri

10363
12000
10000

7138

8000

5412

6000
4000
2000
0
CT1

CT2

CT3

C rt - 41833

Biu 3.5:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
Bng 3.6:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng M7 vi gi th r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
S lng bo t
Cng thc
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1

1072b 14

2060c 32

2953c 18

4041c 22

5207c 4

CT2

2061a 45

4031a 8

7055a 12

9238a 32

9948a 31

CT3

949c 30

2352b 40

4153b 34

6046b 27

7043b 13

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
CT1: pH = 5,0 CT2: pH = 5,5CT3: pH = 6,0
T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.6 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
nht thu c l CT2. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc
thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo
t t cao nht CT2 (trung bnh t 9948 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT3 (7043
bo t/petri) v thp nht CT1(ch t trung bnh 5207 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1, CT2 v CT3 khc bit c ngha (=0,05) trong tt c cc thng
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

th nghim t T1 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t th nghim pH mi trng


nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng M7
cng sinh vi gi th r C rt c gen Ri-tDNA.

S lng bo t/ petri

9948
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0

7043
5207

CT1

CT2

CT3

C rt - M7

Biu 3.6:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng M7 vi gi th r C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
Bng 3.7:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
S lng bo t
Cng thc
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1

533c 23

1362c 13

2469c 22

3655c 45

4161c 22

CT2

1632a 11

3354a 25

4052a 52

7110a 16

8271a 12

CT3

749b 5

1816b 12

3377b 24

4998b 32

5738b 32

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
CT1: pH = 5,0 CT2: pH = 5,5CT3: pH = 6,0
T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.7 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
nht thu c l CT2. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc
thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

t t cao nht CT2 (trung bnh t 8271 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT3 (5738
bo t/petri) v thp nht CT1(ch t trung bnh 4161 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1, CT2 v CT3 khc bit c ngha (=0,05) trong tt c cc thng
th nghim t T1 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t th nghim pH mi trng
nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng 41833
cng sinh vi gi th r Medicago c gen Ri-tDNA.
8271

S lng bo t/ petri

9000
8000
5738

7000
6000
5000

4161

4000
3000
2000
1000
0
CT1

CT2

CT3

Medicago - 41833

Biu 3.7:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng 41833 vi gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
Bng 3.8:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng M7 vi gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA

Cng thc

S lng bo t
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1

663c 34

1537c 25

2589c 56

3934c 70

4342c 15

CT2

1949a 23

3656a 39

5873a 74

8266a 75

9229a 28

CT3

822b 9

2051b 38

3560b 17

4947b 35

5531b 19

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
CT1: pH = 5,0 CT2: pH = 5,5CT3: pH = 6,0
T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.8 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
nht thu c l CT2. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc
thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo
t t cao nht CT2 (trung bnh t 9229 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT3 (5531
bo t/petri) v thp nht CT1(ch t trung bnh 4342 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1, CT2 v CT3 khc bit c ngha (=0,05) trong tt c cc thng
th nghim t T1 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t th nghim pH mi trng
nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng M7
cng sinh vi gi th r Medicago c gen Ri-tDNA.
9229
10000

S lng bo t/petri

9000
8000
7000
6000

5531
4342

5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
CT1

CT2

CT3

Medicago - M7

Biu 3.8:nh hng ca pH mi trng nui cy n nhn sinh khi cng sinh
AM in vitro gia chng M7 vi gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA
Kt qu v ni dung nh gi nh hng ca pH mi trng n kh nng
nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro, vi vic s dng gi th r c gen Ri-DNA
trn mi trng MSR 0,5% agar cho thy, s lng bo t thu c cao nht
mc pH 5,5 trn c 4 loi gi th C rt-41833, C rt-M7, Medicago-41833,
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Medicago-M7. Nh vy, mc pH ti u cho s pht trin ca AM l 5,5. Vi mc


pH 6,0, s lng bo t thu c cao hn so vi mc pH 5,0. iu ny c gii
thch l do AM chu baz tt hn axit (Hawkins and George 1997).
12000
41833-C rt
Ri-tDNA
M7-C rt
Ri-tDNA
M7-Medicago
Ri-tDNA

S lng bo t/petri

10000

41833-Medicago
Ri-tDNA

8000

6000

4000

2000

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

Biu 3.9: Kt qu nhn sinh khi AM in vitro ca 41833-C rt Ri-tDNA, M7C rt Ri-tDNA, 41833-Medicago Ri-tDNA, M7-Medicago Ri-tDNA trn mi
trng MSR 0,5% agar, pH 5,5
Kt qu tng hp trong biu 3.9 cho thy, sau 5 thng tin hnh th
nghim trn mi trng MSR 0,5% agar, pH 5,5 nng sut nhn sinh khi bo t
AM in vitro ca chng 41833 cao hn chng M7 khi cng sinh vi gi th r C
rt c Ri-tDNA. Kt qu thu c ngc li khi tin hnh cng sinh 2 chng AM
trn vi gi th r Medicago c Ri-tDNA (kt qu trong bng 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5,
3.6, 3.7 v 3.8). iu c ngha rng, cc chng AM c nh hng khc nhau
n nng sut nhn sinh khi bo t AM in vitro khi cng sinh vi cc loi gi th
m r khc nhau.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Kt qu tng hp trong biu 3.9 cng ch ra rng, nng sut nhn sinh
khi bo t AM in vitro ca gi th r C rt c Ri-tDNA cao hn gi th r
Medicago c Ri-tDNA khi cng sinh trn cng chng 41833. Kt qu thu c
tng t khi tin hnh cng sinh 2 loi gi th trn chng M7 (kt qu trong bng
3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5,3.6, 3.7 v 3.8). iu c ngha rng, gi th m r C rt
c Ri-tDNA ph hp hn cho nhn sinh khi AM in vitro trong nghin cu ny.

Hnh 3.5: AM cng sinh vo r va sinh trng si nm mi trn r C rt (a),


trn r Medicago (b)
3.4.nh gi nh hng ca gi th m r n kh nng nhn sinh khi cng
sinh AM in vitro
Bng 3.9: nh hng ca cc loi gi th m r khc nhau n nhn sinh khi
cng sinh AM in vitro trn chng 41833
S lng bo t
Cng thc
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1.1

1809a 47

3454a 61

5057a 43

8938a 64

10363a 78

CT 1.2

282c 23

646c 30

1066c 34

1527c 13

2119c 22

CT 2.1

1456b 38

2756b 47

4053b 28

7110b 16

8271b 12

CT 2.2

225c 8

527c 20

847d 5

1226d 11

1720d 20

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

CT 1.1: C rt c Ri-tDNACT 1.2: C rt khng Ri-tDNA


CT 2.1: Medicago c Ri-tDNACT 2.2: Medicago khng Ri-tDNA

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng 3.9
cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao nht
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

thu c l CT1.1. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong cc


thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th t,
v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng bo
t t cao nht CT1.1 (trung bnh t 10363 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT2.1
(8271 bo t/petri), sau l CT 1.2 (2119 bo t/petri), thp nht CT2.2(ch
t trung bnh 1720 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t trong cc
cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc th nghim
CT1.1 v CT1.2, gia CT2.1 v CT2.2, gia CT1.1 v CT2.1 khc bit c ngha
(=0,05) trong tt c cc thng th nghim t T1 n T5. S khc bit c ngha
(=0,05) gia CT1.2 v CT2.2 xy ra t T3 n T5. iu ny c ngha rng, yu t
th nghim pH mi trng nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s sn sinh bo t
in vitro ca chng 41833 cng sinh vi gi th r C rt v Medicago c gen RitDNA v khng gen Ri-tDNA.

12000

10363

S lng bo t/petri

10000

8328

8000
6000
4000

2119

1720

2000
0
CT1.1

CT1.2

CT2.1

CT2.2

Chng 41833

Biu 3.10: nh hng ca cc loi gi th m r khc nhau n nhn sinh khi


cng sinh AM in vitro trn chng 41833

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

12000
41833-C rt
Ri-tDNA

S lng bo t/petri

10000

41833-Medicago
Ri-tDNA

8000

6000

4000
41833-C rt
khng
Ri-tDNA

2000

41833-Medicago
khng
Ri-tDNA

0
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

Biu 3.11: Kt qu nhn sinh khi AM in vitro ca 4 loi gi th m r cng


sinh vi chng 41833 trn mi trng MSR 0,5% agar, pH 5,5
Kt qu tng hp trong biu 3.11 cho thy, nng sut nhn sinh khi bo
t AM in vitro trn gi th m r C rt c Ri-tDNA cao hn rt nhiu trn gi th
m r C rt khng Ri-tDNA (cao hn khong 5 ln T5). iu ny ng cho c 2
loi gi th m r Medicago c Ri-tDNA v khng c Ri-tDNA (kt qu trong
bng 3.9). iu ny c ngha rng, s dng gi th r m r c chuyn gen RitDNA cho hiu qu nhn sinh khi bo t AM in vitro tt hn gi th m r khng
chuyn gen Ri-tDNA.
Kt qu tng hp trong biu 3.11 cng ch ra rng, nng sut nhn sinh
khi bo t AM in vitro trn gi th r C rt c Ri-tDNA cao hn trn gi th m
r Medicago c Ri-tDNA. iu ny ng cho c hai loi gi th m r C rt
khng c Ri-tDNA v Medicago khng c Ri-tDNA (kt qu trong bng 3.9). iu
ny c ngha rng, trong nghin cu ny, gi th m r C rt ph hp hn gi th
m r Medicago cho nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Bng 3.10: nh hng ca cc loi gi th m r khc nhau n nhn sinh khi


cng sinh AM in vitro trn chng M7
S lng bo t

Cng thc
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

CT1.1

2060a 47

4031a 8

7055a 12

9238a 32

9948a 31

CT 1.2

170c 26

534c 6

926c 21

1341c 24

1918c 19

CT 2.1

944b 39

2059b 19

3208b 158

8266b 75

9229b 29

CT 2.2

135c 6

430d 17

743c 11

1075d 9

1534d 6

Post Hoc Test: Gi tr trong cng ct thi gianc ch ci ging nhau l khc bit khng ngha, =0,05
T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

CT 1.1: Carot c Ri-tDNA


CT 1.2: Carot khng Ri-tDNA

CT 2.1: Medicago c Ri-tDNA


CT 2.2: Medicago khng Ri-tDNA

Sau thi gian 5 thng tin hnh b tr v theo di th nghim, kt qu Bng


3.10 cho thy, t thng th nht n thng th nm s lng bo t trung bnh cao
nht thu c l CT1.1. S lng bo t sn sinh mc bnh thng trong
cc thng th nht, thng th hai v thng th ba, sn sinh nhiu nht thng th
t, v sau gim dn thng th nm. Trong thng th 5 (thng cui), s lng
bo t t cao nht CT1.1 (trung bnh t 9948 bo t/petri), tip theo l CT2.1
(9229 bo t/petri), sau l CT 1.2 (1918 bo t/petri), thp nht CT2.2(ch
t trung bnh 1534 bo t/petri).
Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v ngha khc bit ca s lng bo t
trong cc cng thc th nghim cho thy rng, s lng bo t gia cc cng thc
th nghim CT1.1 v CT1.2, gia CT2.1 v CT2.2, gia CT1.1 v CT2.1 khc bit
c ngha (=0,05) trong tt c cc thng th nghim t T1 n T5. S khc bit
c ngha (=0,05) gia CT1.2 v CT2.2 xy ra t T2 n T5. iu ny c ngha
rng, yu t th nghim pH mi trng nui cy nh hng quan trng ti s
sn sinh bo t in vitro ca chng M7 cng sinh vi gi th r C rt v Medicago
c gen Ri-tDNA v khng gen Ri-tDNA.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

9948
10000

S lng bo t/petri

9000
7119

8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
1918

3000

1534

2000
1000
0
CT1.1

CT1.2

CT2.1

CT2.2

Chng M7

Biu 3.12: nh hng ca cc loi gi th m r khc nhau n nhn sinh khi


cng sinh AM in vitro trn chng M7
12000
M7-C rt
Ri-tDNA

10000

M7-Medicago
Ri-tDNA

S lng bo t/petri

8000

6000

4000
M7-C rt khng
Ri-tDNA

2000

M7-Medicago
khng
Ri-tDNA

0
T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T1: thng th nht, T2: thng th 2, T3: thng th 3; T4: thng th 4, T5: thng th 5

Biu 3.13: Kt qu nhn sinh khi AM in vitro ca 4 loi gi th m r cng


sinh vi chng M7 trn mi trng MSR 0,5% agar, pH 5,5
Kt qu tng hp trong biu 3.13 cho thy, nng sut nhn sinh khi bo
t AM in vitro trn gi th m r C rt c Ri-tDNA cao hn rt nhiu trn gi th
m r C rt khng Ri-tDNA (cao hn khong 5 ln T5). iu ny ng cho c 2
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

loi gi th m r Medicago c Ri-tDNA v khng c Ri-tDNA (kt qu trong


bng 3.10). iu ny c ngha rng, s dng gi th r m r c chuyn gen RitDNA cho hiu qu nhn sinh khi bo t AM in vitro tt hn gi th m r khng
chuyn gen Ri-tDNA.
Kt qu tng hp trong biu 3.13 cng ch ra rng, nng sut nhn sinh
khi bo t AM in vitro trn gi th r C rt c Ri-tDNA cao hn trn gi th m
r Medicago c Ri-tDNA. iu ny ng cho c hai loi gi th m r C rt
khng c gen Ri-tDNA v Medicago khng c gen Ri-tDNA (kt qu trong bng
3.10). iu ny c ngha rng, trong nghin cu ny, gi th m r C rt ph hp
hn Medicago cho nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro.

Hnh 3.6: Sinh sn bo t AM sau 1 thng (a), sau 4 thng (b) trn gi th C
rt c Ri-tDNA
Mt kt qu theo di quan trng t c trong nghin cu ny ca chng
ti, l, trong tt c cc mi trng nui cy th nghim, c bit trong mi
trng MSR 0,5% agar vi 10 gam ng/lt mi trng: trong cc thng u th
nghim (T1, T2), khi hm lng ng trong mi trng cn cao, qu trnh hnh
thnh cng sinh v nhn sinh khi AM in vitro din ra chm v thp; tuy nhin qu
trnh ny bt u tng mnh trong thng th 3 v c bit tng rt t bin trong
thng th 4, v gim dn trong thng cui th nghim, thng th 5. iu ny c
gii thch l trong cc thng sau (T3, T4) hm lng ng trong mi trng
MSR gim mnh do gi th r tiu th trc tip, v do khng cn c ch qu
trnh nhn sinh khi AM in vitro.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Chng 4: KT LUN - TN TI - KIN NGH


4.1. Kt lun
- ti nghin cu to c vt liu gi th r C rt (Daucus carrota L.)
in vitrochuyn gen Ri-tDNA hon ton sch khun bng k thut ng nui cy
vi A. rhizogenes trn mi trng MS 0,5% agar, khng cht kch thch sinh
trng v chn lc, loi b vi khun A. rhizogenes trn mi trng MS 0,5% agar
b sung 500 mg Cacbenicilin/lt. Bng phn ng PCR, vt liu gi th r C rt
ny c xc nh c cc gen rolB v rolC ca vi khun A. rhizogenses(c trn
on T-DNA) cc v tr khong 380bp (cho gen rolB) v 580bp (cho gen rolC).
- Sau 5 thng nui cy, nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitrotrn cc loi
mi trng th nghim khc nhau, sinh khi bo t cao nht t c l vi mi
trng MSR 0,5% agar cho c 2 chng AM th nghim 41833 & M7 khi cng sinh
vi 2 loi gi th r chuyn gen Ri-tDNA l C rt (Daucus carrota L.) v
Medicago (Medicago truncatula) vi s liu s lng bo t/a petri tng ng l
10363, 9948, 8271 v 9229; v sinh khi bo t thp nht l vi mi trng MSR
lng, khng agar.
- Sau 5 thng nui cy, nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitrovi cc loi gi
th r in vitro khc nhau, s lng bo t cao nht t c l vi gi th r C rt
chuyn gen Ri-tDNA, tip theo l gi th r Medicago chuyn gen Ri-tDNA v s
lng bo t thp nht l vi 2 loi gi th r C rt v Medicago khng c gen RitDNA, kt qu ny ng cho c 2 chng AM th nghim l 41833 v M7 (kt qu
trong bng 4.9 v bng 4.10).Kt qu tng hp cho thy mt iu r rng rng, s
dng gi th r chuyn gen Ri-tDNA cho mc tiu nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in
vitro mang li hiu qu cao hn rt nhiu so vi gi th r khng chuyn gen RitDNA; iu ny ng cho c 2 loi gi th r l C rt v Medicago, v c 2 chng
AM th nghim l 41833 v M7.
- Trong s cc th nghim v nh hng ca pH mi trng MSR 0,5% agar
n nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM in vitro,s lng bo t AM t c cao nht
trong mi trng c pH l 5,5 v thp nht trn mi trng c pH 5,0. Kt qu ny
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

ng cho c 2 chng AM th nghim l 41833 & M7 khi cng sinh tng ng vi


2 loi gi th r in vitro l C rt chuyn gen Ri-tDNAv Medicago chuyn gen
Ri-tDNA (kt qu trong bng 4.5; 4.6; 4.7 v 4.8).
4.2. Tn ti v kin ngh
Do nhng hn ch v thi gian v dng c thit b cng ngh, ti khng
tin hnh c th nghim nghin cu hnh thnh v nhn sinh khi cng sinh AM
in vitro trn a petri 2 ngn vi 2 loi mi trng MSR khc nhau l MSR agar c
ng v MSR agar khng c ng, nhm tng cng hn kh nng nhn sinh
khi cng sinh AM trn mi trng MSR khng ng. Tc gi lun vn xut
tip tc th nghim nghin cu b sung v iu chnh gim hm lng ng trong
mi trng MSR 0,5% agar gim c ch v kch thch qu trnh hnh thnh
cng sinh v nhn sinh khi AM in vitro ngay t nhng thng u ca th nghim;
v do c th thay th vic phi s dng loi dng c a petri 2 ngn (gi t v
quy trnh phc tp hn).

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

TI LIU THAM KHO


Ti liu Ting Vit
1) Nguyn Minh Chu, L Quc Huy, 2007. Kt qu nghin cu p dng th
nghim ch phm nm r ECM dng vin nang (Alginate beads) cho cy con
Sao en (Hopea odorata). Tp ch KH & CN, B NN&PTNT 18:81-86.
2) Tng Th Chnh, Bi Vn Cng, 2007. Nghin cu s a dng nm cng
sinh Arbuscular mycorrhiza c Vetiver t t nhim ch. Bo co khoa
hc v Sinh thi v Ti nguyn sinh vt, Hi ngh khoa hc ton quc ln
th hai, Vin sinh thi v Ti nguyn sinh vt 1:216-221.
3) Nguyn S Giao, Nguyn Th Nhm, 1988. Nghin cu s dng nm r cng
sinh cho sn xut cy thng con vn m c cht lng cao.
4) L Th H, 2011. Phn lp, xc nh nhm bo t v nhn nui bo tn nm
r ni cng sinh (Arbuscular Mycorrhiza) to c s ng dung cho cy trng
nng lm nghip.
5) L Quc Huy, Nguyn Minh Chu, 2004. Cng ngh nm r ng dng keo
lai v keo tai tng vn m v rng trng. Tp ch KH & CN, B
NN&PTNT 3:400-404.
6) L Quc Huy, Ng Th Thanh Hu, L Thnh Cng, 2009. Mt s kt qu
nghin cu gy trng cy Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) lm nguyn liu cho
sn xut du diesel sinh hc ti Vit Nam. Tp ch KH & CN, B
NN&PTNT thng 2/2009:107-112.
7) Thu, P. Q. 2006-2010. Nghin cu cng ngh sn xut ch phm vi sinh hn
hp dng vin nn cho bch n v thng trn cc lp a thoi ha, ngho
cht dinh dng.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ti liu Ting Anh


8) Abdoulaye, T. 2003. In vitro culture of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi:
advances and future prospects African Journal of Biotechnology 2 (12):692697.
9) Adholeya, A. and R. Singh. 2006. Jatropha for wasteland development :
TERIs Mycorrhiza Technology In: Bhajvaid, P.P. Editor. Biofuels:
towards a greener and secure energy future.
10) AFCconference. 2012. The Hanoi Communiqu: Key Messages. The 2nd
Global Conference on Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change,
Hanoi.
11) Aoyama, T., T. Hirayama, S. Tamamoto, and A. Oka. 1989. Putative start
codon TTG for the regulatory protein VirG of the hairy-root inducing
plasmid pRiA4. . Gene 78:173178.
12) Bago, B. and G. Bcard. 2002. Bases of the obligate biotrophy of arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi. In: Gianinazzi S, Schepp H, Barea JM, Haselwandter K
(eds) Mycorrhiza technology in agriculture: from genes to bioproducts
achievements and hurdles in arbuscular mycorrhizal research. BirkhauserVerlag:3348.
13) BeCard, G. and J. A. Fortin. 1988. Early events of vesiculararbuscular
mycorrhiza formation on Ri T-DNA transformed roots. New Phytologist
108:211-218.
14) Blaszkowski, J., M. Tadych, and T. Madej. 1998. Endogone maritima, a new
species in the Endogonales from Poland. Mycological Research 102:10961100.
15) Boisson-Dernier, A., M. Chabaud, F. Garcia, G. Bcard, C. Rosenberg, and
D. Barker. 2001. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots of Medicago
truncatula for the study of nitrogen-fixing and endomycorrhizal
symbiotic associations. Mol Plant Microb Interact 14:695-700.
16) Cano, C. and A. Bago. 2007. Aseptic mycorrhization inoculant and in vitro
and ex vitro application methods. WO/2007/014974.
17) Chabaud, M., A. Boisson-Dernier, J. Zhang, C. G. Taylor, O. Yu, and D. G.
Barker. 2006. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated root transformation
18) Chabot, S., G. Bcard, and Y. Pich. 1992. Life cycle of Glomus intraradix
in root organ culture. Mycologia 84:315-321.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

19) Cranenbrouck, S., L. Voets, C. Bivort, L. Renard, D.-G. Strullu, S. Declerck,


and J. A. Fortin. 2005. Methodologies for in Vitro Cultivation of Arbuscular
Mycorrhizal Fungi with Root Organs
20) In Vitro Culture of Mycorrhizas. Pages 341-375. Springer Berlin
Heidelberg.
21) De Boulois, H. D., L. Voets, B. Delvaux, I. Jakobsen, and S. Declerck. 2006.
Transport of radiocaesium by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to Medicago
truncatula under in vitro conditions. Environmental Microbiology 8:19261934.
22) Declerck, S., D. DOr, S. Cranenbrouck, and E. Le Bouleng. 2001.
Modelling the sporulation dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in
monoxenic culture. Mycorrhiza 11:225-230.
23) Declerck, S., M. Ijdo, K. Fernamdez Suarez, L. Voets, and I. de la
providencia. 2009. Method and system fo in vitro mass production of
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. WO/2009/09220.
24) Declerck, S., D. Strullu, and J. Fortin. 2005. In vitro culture of mycorrhizas.
Soil biology series, vol. 4. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
25) Declerck, S., D. G. Strullu, and C. Plenchette. 1996. In vitro massproduction of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus versiforme,
associated with Ri T-DNA transformed carrot roots. Mycological Research
100:1237-1242.
26) Declerck, S., D. Stullu, and C. Plenchette. 1998. Monoxenic culture of the
intraradical forms of Glomus sp. isolated from a tropical ecosystem: a
proposed methodology for germplasm collection. Mycologia 90:579585.
27) Douds, D. J. 2002a. Increased spore production by Glomus intraradices in
the split-plate monoxenic culture system by repeated harvest, gel
replacement, and resupply of glucose to the mycorrhiza. Mycor- rhiza
12:163-167.
28) Douds, D. J. 2002b. Increased spore production by Glomus intraradices in
the split-plate monoxenic culture system by repeated harvest, gel
replacement, and resupply of glucose to the mycorrhiza. Mycorrhiza 12:163167.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

29) Douds Jr, D. D. 1997. A procedure for the establishment of Glomus mosseae
in dual culture with Ri T-DNA-transformed carrot roots. Mycorrhiza 7:5761.
30) Fernandez, F., J. Dellamico, and Y. Perez. 2006. Inoculum mycorhizogene
liquide. WO/2006/060968.
31) Fontaine, J., A. Grandmougin-Ferjani, V. Glorian, and R. Durand. 2004. 24Methyl:methylene sterols increase in monoxenic roots after colonization
by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 163:159-167.
32) Fortin, J. Andre, St-arnaud, Marc, Hamel, Chantal, Jolicoeur, and Mario.
1996a. Aseptic in vitro endomycorrhizal spore mass production. United
States Patent 5554530.
33) Fortin, J., G. Becard, S. Declerck, Y. Dalpe, M. St-Arnaud, A. Coughlan,
and Y. Piche. 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhiza on root-organ cultures. Can J
Bot 80:1-20.
34) Fortin, J. A., M. St-Arnaud, C. Hamel, C. Chaverie, and M. Jolicoeur.
1996b. Aseptic in vitro endomycoddhizal mass production. US Pat. No
5554530.
35) Gadkar, V., J. D. Driver, and M. C. Rillig. 2006. A novel in vitro cultivation
system to produce and isolate soluble factors released from hyphae of
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Biotechnology Letters 28:1071-1076.
36) Gianinazzi, S., H. Schepp, J. Barea, and K. Haselwandter. 2002.
Mycorrhizal technology in agriculture: from genes to bioprod- ucts
Birkhauser, Basel
37) Giovannetti, M. and L. Avio. 2002. Biotechnology of arbuscular
mycorrhizas. Pages 275-310 in G. K. George and K. A. Dilip, editors.
Applied Mycology and Biotechnology. Elsevier.
38) Huy, L. Q. 1999. Mycorrhizal techniques for Forestry (unpublished paper).
The TATA Energy Research Institue (TERI) New Delhi, India.Ijdo, M., S.
Cranenbrouck, and S. Declerck. 2011. Methods for large-scale production of
AM fungi: past, present, and future. Mycorrhiza 21:1-16.
39) Jolicoeur, M., R. Williams, C. Chavarie, J. Fortin, and J. Archambault. 1999.
Production of Glomus intraradices propagules, an arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungus, in an airlift bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 63:224-232.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

40) Koffi, M., I. de la Providencia, A. Elsen, and S. Declerck. 2009.


Development of an in vitro culture system adapted to banana
mycorrhization. Afr J Biotechnol 8:2750-2756.
41) Koske, R. E., C. F. Friese, P. D. Olexia, and R. L. Hauke. 1985. Vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizas in Equisetum. Transactions of the British
Mycological Society 85:350-353.
42) Koske, R. E. and J. N. Gemma. 1989. A modified procedure for staining
roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycological Research 92:486-488.
43) Koske, R. E., J. N. Gemma, and W. C. Mueller. 1989. Observations on
sporocarps of the VA mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus litchii.
Mycological Research 92:488-490.
44) Krolicka, A., I. Staniszewska, K. Bielawski, E. Malin ski, J. Szafranek, and
E. Lojkowska. 2001. Establishment of hairy root cultures of Ammi majus.
Plant Sci 160:259264.
45) Mosse, B. and C. Hepper. 1975a. Vesicular-arbuscular infections in root
organ cultures. Physiol Plant Pathol 5:215233.
46) Mosse, B. and C. Hepper. 1975b. Vesicular-arbuscular infections in root
organ cultures. Physiol Plant Pathol 5:215233.
47) Mosse, M. and J. Thompson. 1981a. Production of mycorrhizal fungi. Us
Pat No 4294037.
48) Mosse, M. and J. Thompson. 1981b. Production of mycorrhizal fungi. Us
Pat No. 4294037.
49) Mugnier, J., G. Jung, and J.-L. Prioul. 1986. Method of producing
endomycorrhizan fungi with arbuscular and vesicles in vitro. Us Pat No.
4599312.
50) Mugnier, J. and B. Mosse. 1987. Vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal infection in transformed root-inducing T-DNA roots grown axenically. .
Phytopathology 77:10451050.
51) Murashige, T. and F. Skook. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and
bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:3:473-497.
52) Roger, T., Koide, Barbara, and B. Mosse. 2004a. A history of research on
arbuscular mycorrhiza. Springer-Verlag 14:145163.
53) Roger, T., Koide, and M. Barbara. 2004b. A history of research on
arbuscular mycorrhiza. Mycorrhiza. Springer-Verlag 14:145-163.
S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

54) Sidwa-Gorycka, M., A. Krolicka, A. Orlita, E. Malinski, M. Golebiowski, J.


Kumirska, A. Chromik, E. Biskup, P. Stepnowski, and E. Lojkowska. 2009.
Genetic transformation of Ruta graveolens L. by Agrobacterium rhizogenes:
hairy root cultures a promising approach for production of coumarins and
furanocoumarins. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 97:59-69.
55) Songul, C. D. and A. Sevinc. 2002. Effects of Vesicular-Arbuscular
Mycorrhizae on The Growth and Uptake of Some Heavy Metals by
Oat(Avena Sativa. L.). International Conference On Sustainable Land Use
And Management Canakkale.
56) St-Arnaud, M., C. Hamel, B. Vimard, M. Caron, and J. Fortin. 1996.
Enhanced hyphal growth and spore production of the arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungus Glomus intraradices in an in vitro system in the absence of host
roots. Mycol Res 100:328-332.
57) Strullu, D. and C. Romand. 1986. Mthode dobtention dendomycorhizes a
vesicules et arbuscules en condition axeniques. C R de Acad Sci 303:245
250.
58) Sylvia, D. and A. Jarstfer. 1992. Sheared roots as a VA-mycorrhizal
inoculum and methods for enhancing growth. Us Pat No. 5096481.
59) Tiwari, P. and A. Adholeya. 2003. Host dependent differential spread of
Glomus intraradices on various Ri T-DNA transformed root in vitro. Mycol
Prog 2:171-177.
60) Turmel, M. S. 2004. Exposing the Mycorrhizaes in Agriculture. Dept. of
Plant Science, University of Manitoba.
61) Veena, V. and C. Taylor. 2007. Agrobacterium rhizogenses: recent
developments and promising applications. In Vitro Cellular &
Developmental Biology - Plant 43:383-403.
62) Voets, L., H. Dupre de Boulois, L. Renard, D.-G. Strullu, and S. Declerck.
2005a. Development of an autotrophic culture system for the in vitro
mycorrhization of potato plantlets. FEMS Microbiology Letters 248:111118.
63) Voets, L., H. Dupr de Boulois, L. Renard, D. Strullu, and S. Declerck.
2005b. Development of an autotrophic culture system for the in vitro
mycorrhization of potato plantlets. FEMS Microbiol Lett 248:111-118.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

64) Wang, W. 2003. Method of facilitating mass production and sporulation of


arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi aseptic. Us Pat No. 6759232.

PH LC
Ph lc 1: Kt qu phn tch cc i lng c trng ca s lng bo t
trong th nghim mi trng trn gi th r C rt cng sinh vi chng 41833

95% Confidence
N

Mean

Std.

Std.

Deviation

Error

Interval for Mean


Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Minimum

Maximum

1809.00

47.149

27.221

1691.88

1926.12

1776

1863

147.00

7.937

4.583

127.28

166.72

138

153

644.00

9.165

5.292

621.23

666.77

636

654

Total

866.67

739.190

246.397

298.47

1434.86

138

1863

3453.00

61.828

35.697

3299.41

3606.59

3383

3498

263.00

6.245

3.606

247.49

278.51

258

270

1226.00

13.937

8.047

1191.38

1260.62

1217

1242

Total

1647.33

1417.353

472.451

557.86

2736.81

258

3498

5057.00

43.405

25.060

4949.18

5164.82

5007

5085

330.00

7.937

4.583

310.28

349.72

324

339

1465.00

24.109

13.919

1405.11

1524.89

1448

1493

Total

2284.00

2137.179

712.393

641.22

3926.78

324

5085

8938.33

63.721

36.789

8780.04

9096.62

8892

9011

402.00

3.000

1.732

394.55

409.45

399

405

1805.33

7.506

4.333

1786.69

1823.98

1798

1813

Total

3715.22

3964.314

1321.438

667.98

6762.46

399

9011

10362.50

77.397

44.685

10170.24

10554.76

10305

10451

636.00

7.937

4.583

616.28

655.72

627

642

2021.50

17.385

10.037

1978.31

2064.69

2006

2040

Total

4340.00

4556.718

1518.906

837.40

7842.60

627

10451

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 2: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc cng


thc th nghim mi trng trn gi th r C rt-41833
Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

CT

CT

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 3

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 4

Bonferroni

Upper Bound

1586.56

1737.44

1165.000*

22.949

.000

1089.56

1240.44

-1662.000

22.949

.000

-1737.44

-1586.56

-497.000*

22.949

.000

-572.44

-421.56

22.949

.000

-1240.44

-1089.56

-1165.000

497.000*

2
3

22.949

.000

421.56

572.44

3190.000

30.022

.000

3091.30

3288.70

2227.000

30.022

.000

2128.30

2325.70

30.022

.000

-3288.70

-3091.30

30.022

.000

-1061.70

-864.30

30.022

.000

-2325.70

-2128.30

-3190.000

-963.000

-2227.000

30.022

.000

864.30

1061.70

4727.000

23.703

.000

4649.08

4804.92

3592.000

23.703

.000

3514.08

3669.92

-4727.000

23.703

.000

-4804.92

-4649.08

-1135.000

23.703

.000

-1212.92

-1057.08

-3592.000

23.703

.000

-3669.92

-3514.08

1135.000

23.703

.000

1057.08

1212.92

8536.333

30.279

.000

8436.79

8635.87

7133.000

30.279

.000

7033.46

7232.54

-8536.333

30.279

.000

-8635.87

-8436.79

-1403.333

30.279

.000

-1502.87

-1303.79

-7133.000

30.279

.000

-7232.54

-7033.46

1403.333

30.279

.000

1303.79

1502.87

9726.500

37.581

.000

9602.95

9850.05

8341.000

37.581

.000

8217.45

8464.55

-9726.500*

37.581

.000

-9850.05

-9602.95

-1385.500

37.581

.000

-1509.05

-1261.95

-8341.000*

37.581

.000

-8464.55

-8217.45

37.581

.000

1261.95

1509.05

2
3
1
3

2
3
1
3

963.000

Bonferroni

Lower Bound
.000

S lng bo t 5

Sig.

22.949

S lng bo t 2

(I-J)

Error

95% Confidence Interval

1662.000*

Difference

Std.

2
1

S lng bo t 1

Mean

3
1385.500

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 3: Kt qu phn tch cc i lng c trng ca s lng bo t


trong th nghim mi trng trn gi th r C rt cng sinh vi chng M7

95% Confidence
N

Mean

Std.

Std.

Deviation

Error

Interval for Mean


Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Minimum

Maximum

2061.00

45.398

26.211

1948.22

2173.78

2025

2112

120.00

3.000

1.732

112.55

127.45

117

123

722.00

4.583

2.646

710.62

733.38

717

726

Total

967.67

860.740

286.913

306.04

1629.29

117

2112

4030.50

8.352

4.822

4009.75

4051.25

4023

4040

252.00

3.000

1.732

244.55

259.45

249

255

1244.50

32.392

18.702

1164.03

1324.97

1211

1275

Total

1842.33

1696.547

565.516

538.25

3146.41

249

4040

7055.00

12.031

6.946

7025.11

7084.89

7043

7067

308.00

6.245

3.606

292.49

323.51

303

315

1454.50

17.514

10.112

1410.99

1498.01

1436

1470

Total

2939.17

3126.561

1042.187

535.88

5342.45

303

7067

9238.00

31.261

18.049

9160.34

9315.66

9204

9266

492.67

12.741

7.356

461.02

524.32

478

501

1804.00

7.937

4.583

1784.28

1823.72

1798

1813

Total

3844.89

4084.532

1361.511

705.24

6984.54

478

9266

9947.50

30.790

17.776

9871.01

10023.99

9914

9974

575.00

13.528

7.810

541.40

608.60

561

588

2049.00

39.686

22.913

1950.41

2147.59

2004

2079

Total

4190.50

4364.747

1454.916

835.46

7545.54

561

9974

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 4: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc cng


thc th nghim mi trng trn gi th r C rt-M7

Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

CT

CT

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

2011.86

1339.000*

21.556

.000

1268.14

1409.86

-1941.000

21.556

.000

-2011.86

-1870.14

-602.000*

21.556

.000

-672.86

-531.14

21.556

.000

-1409.86

-1268.14

-1339.000

602.000*

2
3

Bonferroni

21.556

.000

531.14

672.86

3778.500

15.832

.000

3726.45

3830.55

2786.000

15.832

.000

2733.95

2838.05

15.832

.000

-3830.55

-3726.45

15.832

.000

-1044.55

-940.45

15.832

.000

-2838.05

-2733.95

-3778.500

-992.500

-2786.000

15.832

.000

940.45

1044.55

6747.000

10.440

.000

6712.68

6781.32

5600.500

10.440

.000

5566.18

5634.82

-6747.000

10.440

.000

-6781.32

-6712.68

-1146.500

10.440

.000

-1180.82

-1112.18

-5600.500

10.440

.000

-5634.82

-5566.18

1146.500

10.440

.000

1112.18

1180.82

8745.333

16.347

.000

8691.59

8799.08

7434.000

16.347

.000

7380.26

7487.74

-8745.333

16.347

.000

-8799.08

-8691.59

-1311.333

16.347

.000

-1365.08

-1257.59

-7434.000

16.347

.000

-7487.74

-7380.26

1311.333

16.347

.000

1257.59

1365.08

9372.500

24.522

.000

9291.88

9453.12

7898.500*

24.522

.000

7817.88

7979.12

-9372.500

24.522

.000

-9453.12

-9291.88

-1474.000*

24.522

.000

-1554.62

-1393.38

-7898.500

24.522

.000

-7979.12

-7817.88

1474.000*

24.522

.000

1393.38

1554.62

1
3

1
3

992.500

S lng bo t 5

Upper Bound

1870.14

3
S lng bo t 4

Lower Bound
.000

3
So luong bao tu 3

Sig.

21.556

S lng bo t 2

(I-J)

Error

95% Confidence Interval

1941.000*

Difference

Std.

2
1

S lng bo t 1

Mean

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 5: Kt qu phn tch cc i lng c trng ca s lng bo t


trong th nghim mi trng trn gi th r Medicago cng sinh vi chng 41833

95% Confidence
N

Mean

Std.

Std.

Deviation

Error

Interval for Mean


Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Minimum

Maximum

1632.00

10.817

6.245

1605.13

1658.87

1623

1644

81.00

5.196

3.000

68.09

93.91

78

87

408.00

6.000

3.464

393.10

422.90

402

414

Total

707.00

708.084

236.028

162.72

1251.28

78

1644

3353.50

25.159

14.526

3291.00

3416.00

3338

3383

169.00

4.583

2.646

157.62

180.38

165

174

1056.00

36.000

20.785

966.57

1145.43

1020

1092

Total

1526.17

1423.474

474.491

431.99

2620.35

165

3383

4052.00

51.752

29.879

3923.44

4180.56

4001

4104

217.00

4.583

2.646

205.62

228.38

213

222

1249.67

11.590

6.692

1220.87

1278.46

1239

1262

Total

1839.56

1718.734

572.911

518.42

3160.69

213

4104

7110.33

16.258

9.387

7069.95

7150.72

7092

7123

288.00

6.000

3.464

273.10

302.90

282

294

1411.33

7.638

4.410

1392.36

1430.31

1403

1418

Total

2936.56

3167.914

1055.971

501.48

5371.63

282

7123

8271.00

11.715

6.764

8241.90

8300.10

8258

8279

407.00

6.245

3.606

391.49

422.51

402

414

1740.00

6.245

3.606

1724.49

1755.51

1733

1745

Total

3472.67

3644.753

1214.918

671.06

6274.27

402

8279

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 6: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc cng


thc th nghim mi trng trn gi th r Medicago-41833

Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

CT

CT

Mean

95% Confidence Interval

Difference (I-

Bonferroni

6.325

.000

1530.21

1571.79

1224.000

6.325

.000

1203.21

1244.79

-1551.000*

6.325

.000

-1571.79

-1530.21

6.325

.000

-347.79

-306.21

6.325

.000

-1244.79

-1203.21

-327.000

-1224.000*

2
3

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

.000

306.21

347.79

3184.500

20.817

.000

3116.07

3252.93

2297.500

20.817

.000

2229.07

2365.93

20.817

.000

-3252.93

-3116.07

20.817

.000

-955.43

-818.57

20.817

.000

-2365.93

-2229.07

-887.000

-2297.500

20.817

.000

818.57

955.43

3835.000

25.094

.000

3752.51

3917.49

2802.333

25.094

.000

2719.84

2884.83

-3835.000

25.094

.000

-3917.49

-3752.51

-1032.667

25.094

.000

-1115.16

-950.17

-2802.333

25.094

.000

-2884.83

-2719.84

1032.667

25.094

.000

950.17

1115.16

6822.333

8.928

.000

6792.98

6851.68

5699.000

8.928

.000

5669.65

5728.35

-6822.333

8.928

.000

-6851.68

-6792.98

-1123.333

8.928

.000

-1152.68

-1093.98

-5699.000

8.928

.000

-5728.35

-5669.65

1123.333

8.928

.000

1093.98

1152.68

7864.000

6.916

.000

7841.26

7886.74

6531.000*

6.916

.000

6508.26

6553.74

-7864.000

6.916

.000

-7886.74

-7841.26

-1333.000*

6.916

.000

-1355.74

-1310.26

-6531.000

6.916

.000

-6553.74

-6508.26

1333.000*

6.916

.000

1310.26

1355.74

1
3

1
3

887.000

S lng bo t 5

6.325

-3184.500

3
S lng bo t 4

327.000

3
S lng bo t 3

Bonferroni

Upper Bound

1551.000*

S lng bo t 2

Lower Bound

Sig.

J)

S lng bo t 1

Std. Error

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 7: Kt qu phn tch cc i lng c trng ca s lng bo t


trong th nghim mi trng trn gi th r Medicago cng sinh vi chng M7
95% Confidence
N

Mean

Std.

Std.

Deviation

Error

Interval for Mean


Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Minimum

Maximum

1949.00

22.913

13.229

1892.08

2005.92

1929

1974

104.00

3.464

2.000

95.39

112.61

102

108

548.00

7.550

4.359

529.25

566.75

540

555

Total

867.00

834.053

278.018

225.89

1508.11

102

1974

3656.00

39.125

22.589

3558.81

3753.19

3623

3699

218.00

6.245

3.606

202.49

233.51

213

225

1123.00

3.775

2.179

1113.62

1132.38

1119

1127

Total

1665.67

1543.459

514.486

479.26

2852.07

213

3699

5873.00

73.856

42.641

5689.53

6056.47

5792

5936

254.00

6.245

3.606

238.49

269.51

249

261

1355.50

12.933

7.467

1323.37

1387.63

1344

1370

Total

2494.17

2578.895

859.632

511.85

4476.48

249

5936

8265.67

74.969

43.283

8079.43

8451.90

8196

8345

405.67

6.658

3.844

389.13

422.21

398

410

1703.67

11.930

6.888

1674.03

1733.30

1690

1712

Total

3458.33

3649.244

1216.415

653.28

6263.39

398

8345

9229.00

28.710

16.576

9157.68

9300.32

9206

9261

457.00

6.245

3.606

441.49

472.51

450

462

1827.50

9.644

5.568

1803.54

1851.46

1817

1835

Total

3837.83

4086.722

1362.241

696.50

6979.17

450

9261

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 8: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc cng


thc th nghim mi trng trn gi th r Medicago-M7

Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

CT

CT

Bonferroni

Difference (IJ)

S lng bo t 3

Bonferroni

1882.77

1401.000*

11.489

.000

1363.23

1438.77

-1845.000*

11.489

.000

-1882.77

-1807.23

11.489

.000

-481.77

-406.23

11.489

.000

-1438.77

-1363.23

Bonferroni

-444.000

-1401.000*

Bonferroni

444.000

11.489

.000

406.23

481.77

3438.000

18.762

.000

3376.32

3499.68

2533.000

18.762

.000

2471.32

2594.68

18.762

.000

-3499.68

-3376.32

18.762

.000

-966.68

-843.32

18.762

.000

-2594.68

-2471.32

18.762

.000

843.32

966.68

-3438.000

-905.000

-2533.000

905.000

5619.000*

35.468

.000

5502.40

5735.60

35.468

.000

4400.90

4634.10

-5619.000

35.468

.000

-5735.60

-5502.40

-1101.500

35.468

.000

-1218.10

-984.90

-4517.500

35.468

.000

-4634.10

-4400.90

1101.500

35.468

.000

984.90

1218.10

7860.000

35.923

.000

7741.91

7978.09

6562.000

35.923

.000

6443.91

6680.09

-7860.000

35.923

.000

-7978.09

-7741.91

-1298.000

35.923

.000

-1416.09

-1179.91

-6562.000

35.923

.000

-6680.09

-6443.91

1298.000

35.923

.000

1179.91

1416.09

8772.000

14.577

.000

8724.08

8819.92

7401.500*

14.577

.000

7353.58

7449.42

-8772.000

14.577

.000

-8819.92

-8724.08

-1370.500*

14.577

.000

-1418.42

-1322.58

-7401.500

14.577

.000

-7449.42

-7353.58

1370.500*

14.577

.000

1322.58

1418.42

1
3

1
3

S lng bo t 5

3
S lng bo t 4

Upper Bound

1807.23

3
2

Lower Bound

.000

Bonferroni

Sig.

11.489

S lng bo t 2

Error

95% Confidence Interval

1845.000*

Std.

2
1

S lng bo t 1

Mean

4517.500

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

Ph lc 9: Kt qu phn tch cc i lng c trng ca s lng bo t


trong th nghim pH mi trng trn gi th r C rt cng sinh vi chng 41833

95% Confidence
N

Mean

Std.

Std.

Deviation

Error

Interval for Mean


Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Minimum

Maximum

1108.33

25.423

14.678

1045.18

1171.49

1079

1124

1809.00

47.149

27.221

1691.88

1926.12

1776

1863

1025.33

8.327

4.807

1004.65

1046.02

1016

1032

Total

1314.22

373.804

124.601

1026.89

1601.55

1016

1863

2127.33

19.655

11.348

2078.51

2176.16

2115

2150

3453.33

61.647

35.592

3300.19

3606.47

3383

3498

2523.33

17.898

10.333

2478.87

2567.79

2508

2543

Total

2701.33

590.445

196.815

2247.48

3155.19

2115

3498

3147.00

13.748

7.937

3112.85

3181.15

3135

3162

5057.00

43.405

25.060

4949.18

5164.82

5007

5085

4357.33

30.665

17.704

4281.16

4433.51

4322

4377

Total

4187.11

837.300

279.100

3543.51

4830.72

3135

5085

4216.33

16.921

9.770

4174.30

4258.37

4202

4235

8938.33

63.721

36.789

8780.04

9096.62

8892

9011

6164.33

70.571

40.744

5989.02

6339.64

6114

6245

Total

6439.67

2055.654

685.218

4859.55

8019.78

4202

9011

5412.33

6.658

3.844

5395.79

5428.87

5408

5420

10362.67

77.681

44.849

10169.70

10555.64

10305

10451

7138.00

13.528

7.810

7104.40

7171.60

7125

7152

Total

7637.67

2176.428

725.476

5964.72

9310.62

5408

10451

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 10: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc cng


thc th nghim pH mi trng trn gi th r C rt-41833
Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

Mean

Std.

CT

CT

Difference (I-J)

Error

-700.667*

25.555

83.000

1
3

783.667

-83.000

95% Confidence Interval


Sig.
Lower Bound

Upper Bound

.000

-784.68

-616.66

25.555

.053

-1.01

167.01

700.667*

25.555

.000

616.66

784.68

25.555

.000

699.66

867.68

25.555

.053

-167.01

1.01

25.555

.000

-867.68

-699.66

S lng bo t 1

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 2

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 3

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 4

Bonferroni

-783.667

-1326.000*

31.647

.000

-1430.04

-1221.96

-396.000*

31.647

.000

-500.04

-291.96

1326.000

31.647

.000

1221.96

1430.04

930.000

31.647

.000

825.96

1034.04

396.000

31.647

.000

291.96

500.04

1
2

31.647

.000

-1034.04

-825.96

-1910.000

25.877

.000

-1995.07

-1824.93

-1210.333

25.877

.000

-1295.40

-1125.26

1910.000

25.877

.000

1824.93

1995.07

1
2

-930.000

699.667

25.877

.000

614.60

784.74

25.877

.000

1125.26

1295.40

1210.333

25.877

.000

-784.74

-614.60

-4722.000

45.527

.000

-4871.67

-4572.33

-1948.000

45.527

.000

-2097.67

-1798.33

4722.000

45.527

.000

4572.33

4871.67

2774.000

45.527

.000

2624.33

2923.67

1948.000

45.527

.000

1798.33

2097.67

-2774.000

45.527

.000

-2923.67

-2624.33

-4950.333

37.303

.000

-5072.96

-4827.70

-1725.667

37.303

.000

-1848.30

-1603.04

4950.333*

37.303

.000

4827.70

5072.96

3224.667

37.303

.000

3102.04

3347.30

1725.667*

37.303

.000

1603.04

1848.30

-3224.667*

37.303

.000

-3347.30

-3102.04

3
1
2
2

-699.667

S lng bo t 5

Bonferroni

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 11: Kt qu phn tch cc i lng c trng ca s lng bo t


trong th nghim pH mi trng trn gi th r C rt cng sinh vi chng M7

95% Confidence Interval for


N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Mean

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Min

Max

1071.67

14.012

8.090

1036.86

1106.47

1058

1086

2061.00

45.398

26.211

1948.22

2173.78

2025

2112

948.67

30.072

17.362

873.96

1023.37

927

983

Total

1360.44

528.857

176.286

953.93

1766.96

927

2112

2060.33

32.130

18.550

1980.52

2140.15

2024

2085

4030.67

8.622

4.978

4009.25

4052.08

4023

4040

2352.33

40.017

23.104

2252.93

2451.74

2313

2393

Total

2814.44

921.256

307.085

2106.30

3522.58

2024

4040

2953.33

17.616

10.171

2909.57

2997.09

2939

2973

7055.33

12.014

6.936

7025.49

7085.18

7043

7067

4153.00

33.719

19.468

4069.24

4236.76

4124

4190

Total

4720.56

1826.620

608.873

3316.49

6124.62

2939

7067

4041.33

22.301

12.875

3985.93

4096.73

4016

4058

9238.33

31.533

18.206

9160.00

9316.67

9204

9266

6045.67

26.633

15.377

5979.51

6111.83

6023

6075

Total

6441.78

2270.013

756.671

4696.89

8186.66

4016

9266

5206.67

4.163

2.404

5196.32

5217.01

5202

5210

9948.00

30.790

17.776

9871.51

10024.49

9914

9974

7043.33

12.503

7.219

7012.27

7074.39

7031

7056

Total

7399.33

2070.414

690.138

5807.87

8990.79

5202

9974

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 12: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc cng


thc th nghim pH mi trng trn gi th r C rt-M7
95% Confidence Interval
Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

Mean Difference

CT

CT

(I-J)

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 3

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 4

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

.000

-1076.47

-902.19

123.000*

26.506

.011

35.86

210.14

989.333

26.506

.000

902.19

1076.47

1112.333*

26.506

.000

1025.19

1199.47

-123.000

26.506

.011

-210.14

-35.86

-1112.333*

26.506

.000

-1199.47

-1025.19

-1970.333

24.531

.000

-2050.98

-1889.69

24.531

.000

-372.65

-211.35

1970.333

24.531

.000

1889.69

2050.98

1678.333

24.531

.000

1597.69

1758.98

-292.000

24.531

.000

211.35

372.65

-1678.333

24.531

.000

-1758.98

-1597.69

-4102.000

18.807

.000

-4163.83

-4040.17

-1199.667

18.807

.000

-1261.49

-1137.84

4102.000

18.807

.000

4040.17

4163.83

2902.333

18.807

.000

2840.51

2964.16

1199.667

18.807

.000

1137.84

1261.49

-2902.333

18.807

.000

-2964.16

-2840.51

-5197.000

22.116

.000

-5269.70

-5124.30

-2004.333

22.116

.000

-2077.04

-1931.63

5197.000

22.116

.000

5124.30

5269.70

3192.667

22.116

.000

3119.96

3265.37

2004.333

22.116

.000

1931.63

2077.04

-3192.667

22.116

.000

-3265.37

-3119.96

-4741.333*

15.788

.000

-4793.24

-4689.43

-1836.667

15.788

.000

-1888.57

-1784.76

4741.333*

15.788

.000

4689.43

4793.24

2904.667

15.788

.000

2852.76

2956.57

1836.667*

15.788

.000

1784.76

1888.57

2
2

3
1
2
2

3
1

292.000

2
3

Bound

26.506

1
S lng bo t 5

Upper

-989.333

S lng bo t 2

Lower Bound

Sig.

S lng bo t 1

Std. Error

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

-2904.667*

15.788

.000

-2956.57

-2852.76

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

Ph lc 13: Kt qu phn tch cc i lng c trng ca s lng bo t trong


th nghim pH mi trng trn gi th r Medicago cng sinh vi chng 41833

95% Confidence Interval


N

Mean

Std.

Std.

Deviation

Error

for Mean
Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Minimum

Maximum

533.00

22.517

13.000

477.07

588.93

510

555

1632.00

10.817

6.245

1605.13

1658.87

1623

1644

749.00

4.583

2.646

737.62

760.38

744

753

Total

971.33

504.410

168.137

583.61

1359.06

510

1644

1362.33

12.583

7.265

1331.08

1393.59

1349

1374

3354.00

25.159

14.526

3291.50

3416.50

3338

3383

1816.33

11.930

6.888

1786.70

1845.97

1803

1826

Total

2177.56

904.097

301.366

1482.60

2872.51

1349

3383

2469.33

22.030

12.719

2414.61

2524.06

2448

2492

4052.33

51.501

29.734

3924.40

4180.27

4001

4104

3377.33

23.756

13.715

3318.32

3436.35

3350

3393

Total

3299.67

688.602

229.534

2770.36

3828.97

2448

4104

3654.67

45.347

26.181

3542.02

3767.31

3627

3707

7211.33

77.391

44.682

7019.08

7403.58

7122

7258

4997.67

32.332

18.667

4917.35

5077.98

4963

5027

Total

5287.89

1556.118

518.706

4091.75

6484.03

3627

7258

4161.33

22.234

12.837

4106.10

4216.56

4148

4187

8271.33

11.590

6.692

8242.54

8300.13

8258

8279

5735.33

31.565

18.224

5656.92

5813.74

5705

5768

Total

6056.00

1795.972

598.657

4675.49

7436.51

4148

8279

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 14: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc cng


thc th nghim pH mi trng trn gi th r Medicago-41833

Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

CT

CT

Mean
Difference (IJ)

Bonferroni

.000

1530.21

1571.79

1224.000

6.325

.000

1203.21

1244.79

-1551.000*

6.325

.000

-1571.79

-1530.21

6.325

.000

-347.79

-306.21

6.325

.000

-1244.79

-1203.21

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 4

Bonferroni

-327.000

-1224.000*
327.000

6.325

.000

306.21

347.79

3184.500

20.817

.000

3116.07

3252.93

2297.500*

20.817

.000

2229.07

2365.93

-3184.500

20.817

.000

-3252.93

-3116.07

20.817

.000

-955.43

-818.57

20.817

.000

-2365.93

-2229.07

-887.000

-2297.500

20.817

.000

818.57

955.43

3835.000

25.094

.000

3752.51

3917.49

2802.333

25.094

.000

2719.84

2884.83

-3835.000

25.094

.000

-3917.49

-3752.51

-1032.667

25.094

.000

-1115.16

-950.17

-2802.333

25.094

.000

-2884.83

-2719.84

1032.667

25.094

.000

950.17

1115.16

6822.333*

8.928

.000

6792.98

6851.68

8.928

.000

5669.65

5728.35

-6822.333

8.928

.000

-6851.68

-6792.98

-1123.333

8.928

.000

-1152.68

-1093.98

-5699.000

8.928

.000

-5728.35

-5669.65

1123.333

8.928

.000

1093.98

1152.68

7864.000

6.916

.000

7841.26

7886.74

6531.000*

6.916

.000

6508.26

6553.74

-7864.000

6.916

.000

-7886.74

-7841.26

-1333.000*

6.916

.000

-1355.74

-1310.26

6.916

.000

-6553.74

-6508.26

1
3

1
3

887.000

3
S lng bo t 3

Upper Bound

6.325

Bonferroni

Lower Bound

S lng bo t 2

Sig.

1551.000*

Error

95% Confidence Interval

2
1

S lng bo t 1

Std.

5699.000

1
S lng bo t 5

Bonferroni
2
3

-6531.000

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

1333.000*

6.916

.000

1310.26

1355.74

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

Ph lc 15: Kt qu phn tch cc i lng c trng ca s lng bo t trong


th nghim pH mi trng trn gi th r Medicago cng sinh vi chng M7
95% Confidence
N

Mean

Std.

Std.

Deviation

Error

Interval for Mean


Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Minimum

Maximum

663.00

33.808

19.519

579.02

746.98

624

684

1949.00

22.913

13.229

1892.08

2005.92

1929

1974

822.00

9.000

5.196

799.64

844.36

813

831

Total

1144.67

607.526

202.509

677.68

1611.65

624

1974

1537.33

24.583

14.193

1476.27

1598.40

1509

1553

3656.33

38.850

22.430

3559.82

3752.84

3623

3699

2050.67

37.501

21.651

1957.51

2143.82

2013

2088

Total

2414.78

957.789

319.263

1678.56

3151.00

1509

3699

2589.33

56.146

32.416

2449.86

2728.81

2553

2654

5873.33

73.793

42.604

5690.02

6056.64

5792

5936

3560.33

17.243

9.955

3517.50

3603.17

3545

3579

Total

4007.67

1461.816

487.272

2884.02

5131.32

2553

5936

3934.00

70.235

40.550

3759.53

4108.47

3853

3978

8315.33

82.008

47.347

8111.61

8519.05

8234

8398

4947.33

35.445

20.464

4859.28

5035.38

4923

4988

Total

5732.22

1987.215

662.405

4204.71

7259.73

3853

8398

4342.33

14.640

8.452

4305.97

4378.70

4329

4358

9229.33

28.431

16.415

9158.71

9299.96

9206

9261

5531.33

19.296

11.141

5483.40

5579.27

5516

5553

Total

6367.67

2207.218

735.739

4671.05

8064.28

4329

9261

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 16: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc cng


thc th nghim pH mi trng trn gi th r Medicago-M7
Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

Mean

Std.

CT

CT

Difference (I-J)

Error

-1286.000

3
Bonferroni

Bonferroni

So luong bo t 3

Bonferroni

S lng bo t 4

Bonferroni

-1221.19

-159.000*

19.715

.001

-223.81

-94.19

1286.000

19.715

.000

1221.19

1350.81

1127.000*

19.715

.000

1062.19

1191.81

19.715

.001

94.19

223.81

Bonferroni

159.000

-1127.000*

19.715

.000

-1191.81

-1062.19

-2119.000

27.968

.000

-2210.94

-2027.06

27.968

.000

-605.28

-421.39

2119.000

27.968

.000

2027.06

2210.94

1605.667

27.968

.000

1513.72

1697.61

-513.333

27.968

.000

421.39

605.28

-1605.667

27.968

.000

-1697.61

-1513.72

-3284.000

44.460

.000

-3430.16

-3137.84

-971.000*

44.460

.000

-1117.16

-824.84

3284.000*

44.460

.000

3137.84

3430.16

2313.000

44.460

.000

2166.84

2459.16

971.000*

44.460

.000

824.84

1117.16

-2313.000*

44.460

.000

-2459.16

-2166.84

-4381.333

53.572

.000

-4557.45

-4205.22

-1013.333

53.572

.000

-1189.45

-837.22

4381.333

53.572

.000

4205.22

4557.45

3368.000

53.572

.000

3191.89

3544.11

1013.333

53.572

.000

837.22

1189.45

-3368.000

53.572

.000

-3544.11

-3191.89

-4887.000

17.607

.000

-4944.88

-4829.12

-1189.000*

17.607

.000

-1246.88

-1131.12

4887.000

17.607

.000

4829.12

4944.88

3698.000*

17.607

.000

3640.12

3755.88

1189.000

17.607

.000

1131.12

1246.88

-3698.000*

17.607

.000

-3755.88

-3640.12

3
1
2

S lng bo t 5

Upper Bound

-1350.81

S lng bao tu 2

Lower Bound
.000

95% Confidence Interval

19.715

S lng bo t 1

Sig.

513.333

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

Ph lc 17: Bng kt qu cc i lng c trng v s lng bo t ca cc


loi gi th r cng sinh vi chng 41833
95% Confidence Interval
N

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

Mean

Std.
Deviation

for Mean
Std. Error
Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Min

Max

1.1

1809.00

47.149

27.221

1691.88

1926.12

1776

1863

1.2

282.00

23.431

13.528

223.79

340.21

255

297

2.1

1456.33

38.004

21.942

1361.93

1550.74

1413

1484

2.2

225.00

7.937

4.583

205.28

244.72

219

234

Total

12

943.08

732.759

211.529

477.51

1408.66

219

1863

1.1

3454.00

61.286

35.384

3301.76

3606.24

3384

3498

1.2

646.00

30.050

17.349

571.35

720.65

612

669

2.1

2755.67

46.758

26.996

2639.51

2871.82

2712

2805

2.2

527.00

19.975

11.533

477.38

576.62

510

549

Total

12

1845.67

1341.412

387.232

993.37

2697.96

510

3498

1.1

5057.00

43.405

25.060

4949.18

5164.82

5007

5085

1.2

1066.00

33.719

19.468

982.24

1149.76

1029

1095

2.1

4053.33

28.449

16.425

3982.66

4124.00

4034

4086

2.2

847.00

4.583

2.646

835.62

858.38

843

852

Total

12

2755.83

1917.429

553.514

1537.56

3974.11

843

5085

1.1

8938.33

63.721

36.789

8780.04

9096.62

8892

9011

1.2

1526.67

12.741

7.356

1495.02

1558.32

1512

1535

2.1

7110.33

16.258

9.387

7069.95

7150.72

7092

7123

2.2

1226.33

10.693

6.173

1199.77

1252.90

1217

1238

Total

12

4700.42

3538.592

1021.503

2452.10

6948.73

1217

9011

1.1

10362.67

77.681

44.849

10169.70

10555.64

10305

10451

1.2

2119.33

21.939

12.667

2064.83

2173.83

2102

2144

2.1

8327.67

13.317

7.688

8294.59

8360.75

8313

8339

2.2

1720.33

19.858

11.465

1671.00

1769.66

1706

1743

Total

12

5632.50

3952.807

1141.077

3121.01

8143.99

1706

10451

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 18: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc loi


gi th m r cng sinh vi chng 41833

Dependent Variable

(I)

(J)

CT CT

Upper Bound

1434.09

1619.91

1.1 2.1

352.667*

26.706

.000

259.76

445.57

2.2

1584.000

26.706

.000

1491.09

1676.91

1.1

-1527.000*

26.706

.000

-1619.91

-1434.09

1.2 2.1

26.706

.000

-1267.24

-1081.43

-1174.333

26.706

.392

-35.91

149.91

26.706

.000

-445.57

-259.76

2.1 1.2

1174.333*

26.706

.000

1081.43

1267.24

2.2

1231.333

26.706

.000

1138.43

1324.24

1.1

-1584.000*

26.706

.000

-1676.91

-1491.09

-57.000

26.706

.392

-149.91

35.91

57.000
-352.667

2.1

-1231.333*

26.706

.000

-1324.24

-1138.43

1.2

2808.000

34.748

.000

2687.12

2928.88

1.1 2.1

34.748

.000

577.45

819.22

34.748

.000

2806.12

3047.88

-2808.000

34.748

.000

-2928.88

-2687.12

1.2 2.1

-2109.667

34.748

.000

-2230.55

-1988.78

2.2

119.000

2.2
1.1

1.1
2.1 1.2
2.2

698.333

2927.000

34.748

.054

-1.88

239.88

34.748

.000

-819.22

-577.45

2109.667

34.748

.000

1988.78

2230.55

2228.667

34.748

.000

2107.78

2349.55

34.748

.000

-3047.88

-2806.12

-698.333

1.1

-2927.000

2.2 1.2

-119.000

34.748

.054

-239.88

1.88

2.1

-2228.667

34.748

.000

-2349.55

-2107.78

1.2

3991.000

25.336

.000

3902.86

4079.14

1003.667

25.336

.000

915.53

1091.81

4210.000

25.336

.000

4121.86

4298.14

-3991.000

25.336

.000

-4079.14

-3902.86

1.2 2.1

-2987.333

25.336

.000

-3075.47

-2899.19

2.2

25.336

.000

130.86

307.14

1.1 2.1
Bonferroni

Lower Bound

.000

Bonferroni

Bonferroni

Sig.

26.706

2.2 1.2

S lng bo t 3

(I-J)

Error

95% Confidence Interval

1527.000*

1.1

S lng bo t 2

Difference

Std.

1.2

2.2
S lng bo t 1

Mean

2.2
1.1

219.000

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

1.1

-1003.667*

25.336

.000

-1091.81

-915.53

2.1 1.2

2987.333

25.336

.000

2899.19

3075.47

3206.333

25.336

.000

3118.19

3294.47

25.336

.000

-4298.14

-4121.86

25.336

.000

-307.14

-130.86

25.336

.000

-3294.47

-3118.19

2.2
1.1

-4210.000

2.2 1.2

2.1

1.1

7411.667*

27.693

.000

7315.33

7508.01

2.1

1828.000

27.693

.000

1731.66

1924.34

7712.000

27.693

.000

7615.66

7808.34

-7411.667

27.693

.000

-7508.01

-7315.33

-5583.667

27.693

.000

-5680.01

-5487.33

300.333

27.693

.000

203.99

396.67

-1828.000

27.693

.000

-1924.34

-1731.66

5583.667

27.693

.000

5487.33

5680.01

5884.000

27.693

.000

5787.66

5980.34

-7712.000

27.693

.000

-7808.34

-7615.66

-300.333

27.693

.000

-396.67

-203.99

-5884.000

27.693

.000

-5980.34

-5787.66

1.2

8243.333

34.369

.000

8123.77

8362.90

2.1

2035.000*

34.369

.000

1915.43

2154.57

2.2

8642.333

34.369

.000

8522.77

8761.90

1.1

-8243.333*

34.369

.000

-8362.90

-8123.77

2.1

34.369

.000

-6327.90

-6088.77

2.2

399.000*

34.369

.000

279.43

518.57

1.1

34.369

.000

-2154.57

-1915.43

1.2

6208.333*

34.369

.000

6088.77

6327.90

2.2

6607.333

34.369

.000

6487.77

6726.90

1.1

-8642.333*

34.369

.000

-8761.90

-8522.77

1.2

-399.000

34.369

.000

-518.57

-279.43

2.1

-6607.333*

34.369

.000

-6726.90

-6487.77

1.1

S lng bo t 4

2.1
2.2

Bonferroni

1.1
2.1

1.2
2.2
1.1

2.2

1.2
2.1

1.1

1.2
S lng bo t 5

-3206.333

1.2

2.2

1.2

-219.000

-6208.333

Bonferroni
2.1

2.2

-2035.000

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 19: Bng kt qu cc i lng c trng v s lng bo t ca cc


loi gi th r cng sinh vi chng M7
95% Confidence
N

S lng bo t 1

S lng bo t 2

S lng bo t 3

S lng bo t 4

S lng bo t 5

Mean

Std.
Deviation

Std.
Error

Interval for Mean


Lower

Upper

Bound

Bound

Minimum

Maximum

1.1

2059.67

47.014

27.144

1942.88

2176.46

2021

2112

1.2

170.00

26.211

15.133

104.89

235.11

141

192

2.1

944.00

39.038

22.539

847.02

1040.98

906

984

2.2

135.00

6.000

3.464

120.10

149.90

129

141

Total

12

827.17

816.863

235.808

308.16

1346.18

129

2112

1.1

4030.67

8.622

4.978

4009.25

4052.08

4023

4040

1.2

534.00

6.000

3.464

519.10

548.90

528

540

2.1

2059.33

18.610

10.745

2013.10

2105.56

2042

2079

2.2

430.00

17.059

9.849

387.62

472.38

411

444

Total

12

1763.50

1524.165

439.988

795.09

2731.91

411

4040

1.1

7055.33

12.014

6.936

7025.49

7085.18

7043

7067

1.2

926.00

21.284

12.288

873.13

978.87

903

945

2.1

3208.00

158.329

91.411

2814.69

3601.31

3102

3390

2.2

743.00

10.536

6.083

716.83

769.17

732

753

Total

12

2983.08

2657.779

767.235

1294.41

4671.76

732

7067

1.1

9238.33

31.533

18.206

9160.00

9316.67

9204

9266

1.2

1341.00

24.062

13.892

1281.23

1400.77

1316

1364

2.1

8265.67

74.969

43.283

8079.43

8451.90

8196

8345

2.2

1075.67

9.292

5.364

1052.59

1098.75

1068

1086

Total

12

4980.17

3957.272

1142.366

2465.84

7494.50

1068

9266

1.1

9948.00

30.790

17.776

9871.51

10024.49

9914

9974

1.2

1918.33

18.610

10.745

1872.10

1964.56

1901

1938

2.1

9229.00

28.710

16.576

9157.68

9300.32

9206

9261

2.2

1534.00

6.245

3.606

1518.49

1549.51

1529

1541

Total

12

5657.33

4117.040

1188.487

3041.49

8273.18

1529

9974

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

Ph lc 20: Kt qu phn tch Post Hoc Test v s lng bo t ca cc loi


gi th m r cng sinh vi chng M7
Dependent Variable

(J)

Mean

CT

CT

Difference (I-J)

1.2

1889.667*

27.256

2.1

1115.667

2.2
1.1

-1889.667

2.1

1.1

1.2
S lng bo t 1

2.2

.000

1794.85

1984.49

27.256

.000

1020.85

1210.49

1924.667*

27.256

.000

1829.85

2019.49

27.256

.000

-1984.49

-1794.85

-774.000*

27.256

.000

-868.82

-679.18

2.2

35.000

27.256

1.000

-59.82

129.82

1.1

-1115.667*

27.256

.000

-1210.49

-1020.85

27.256

.000

679.18

868.82

27.256

.000

714.18

903.82

27.256

.000

-2019.49

-1829.85

774.000

2.2

809.000*

1.1

-1924.667

1.2

-35.000

27.256

1.000

-129.82

59.82

27.256

.000

-903.82

-714.18

3496.667

11.163

.000

3457.83

3535.50

1971.333

11.163

.000

1932.50

2010.17

3600.667

11.163

.000

3561.83

3639.50

-3496.667

11.163

.000

-3535.50

-3457.83

2.1

-1525.333

11.163

.000

-1564.17

-1486.50

2.2

2.1

1.1

2.1

1.1

11.163

.000

65.17

142.83

1.1

-1971.333

11.163

.000

-2010.17

-1932.50

1.2

1525.333

11.163

.000

1486.50

1564.17

1629.333

11.163

.000

1590.50

1668.17

Bonferroni

11.163

.000

-3639.50

-3561.83

-3600.667

1.2

11.163

.000

-142.83

-65.17

2.1

-1629.333

11.163

.000

-1668.17

-1590.50

1.2

6129.333

65.544

.000

5901.31

6357.35

3847.333

65.544

.000

3619.31

4075.35

6312.333

65.544

.000

6084.31

6540.35

-6129.333

65.544

.000

-6357.35

-5901.31

2.1

-2282.000

65.544

.000

-2510.02

-2053.98

2.2

183.000

2.1

1.1
1.2

2.1

104.000

1.1

2.2
S lng bo t 3

-809.000

2.2

2.2

2.2

Bonferroni

1.2

1.2

1.2

Sig.
Upper Bound

2.1

1.1

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Bonferroni
2.1

S lng bo t 2

95% Confidence Interval

(I)

-104.000

65.544

.141

-45.02

411.02

1.1

-3847.333

65.544

.000

-4075.35

-3619.31

1.2

65.544

.000

2053.98

2510.02

2282.000

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

2.2

2465.000*

65.544

.000

2236.98

2693.02

1.1

-6312.333*

65.544

.000

-6540.35

-6084.31

2.2

1.2

-183.000

65.544

.141

-411.02

45.02

2.1

-2465.000

65.544

.000

-2693.02

-2236.98

7897.333

34.833

.000

7776.15

8018.51

972.667

34.833

.000

851.49

1093.85

8162.667

34.833

.000

8041.49

8283.85

-7897.333

34.833

.000

-8018.51

-7776.15

-6924.667

34.833

.000

-7045.85

-6803.49

265.333

34.833

.000

144.15

386.51

-972.667

34.833

.000

-1093.85

-851.49

6924.667

34.833

.000

6803.49

7045.85

7190.000

34.833

.000

7068.82

7311.18

-8162.667

34.833

.000

-8283.85

-8041.49

-265.333

34.833

.000

-386.51

-144.15

-7190.000

34.833

.000

-7311.18

-7068.82

8029.667

18.963

.000

7963.70

8095.64

2.1

719.000*

18.963

.000

653.03

784.97

2.2

8414.000

18.963

.000

8348.03

8479.97

1.1

-8029.667*

18.963

.000

-8095.64

-7963.70

2.1

18.963

.000

-7376.64

-7244.70

2.2

384.333*

18.963

.000

318.36

450.30

1.1

-719.000

18.963

.000

-784.97

-653.03

1.2

7310.667*

18.963

.000

7244.70

7376.64

2.2

7695.000

18.963

.000

7629.03

7760.97

1.1

-8414.000*

18.963

.000

-8479.97

-8348.03

1.2

-384.333

18.963

.000

-450.30

-318.36

2.1

-7695.000*

18.963

.000

-7760.97

-7629.03

1.2
1.1

2.1
2.2
1.1

1.2
Slng bo t 4

2.1
2.2

Bonferroni

1.1
2.1

1.2
2.2
1.1

2.2

1.2
2.1
1.2

1.1

1.2
S lng bo t 5

-7310.667

Bonferroni
2.1

2.2

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0,05 level.

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

S ha bi Trung tm Hc liu i hc Thi Nguyn

http://www.lrc-tnu.edu.vn

You might also like