Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 9
(Lecture 38)
DRILLED-SHAFT AND CAISSON FOUNDATIONS
Topics
1.1 UPLIFT CAPACITY OF DRILLED SHAFTS
1.2 EXAMPLES & SOLUTIONS
[9.32]
Figure 9.22 Nature of failure surface in soil caused by uplifting force on drilled shaft with
bell
Where
= gross ultimate uplift capacity
The magnitude of drilled shafts in sand can be estimated by the procedure outlined
by Meyerhof and Adams (1968) and Das and Seely (1975):
=
[9.33]
= Unit weight of soil above the bell (Note: If the soil is submerged, the effective unit
weight should be used).
The breakout factor may be expressed as
= 2 tan + 1 + 1
[9.34]
Where
= nominal uplift coefficient
= soil friction angle
The value of may be taken as 0.9 for all values of from 30 45 . Meyerhof and
Adams (1968) gave the variation of m as
Soil friction angle, (deg)
30
0.15
35
0.25
40
0.35
45
0.50
Experiments have shown that the value of increases with the / ratio to a critical
value, (/ ) , and remains constant thereafter. The critical embedment ratio, (/ ) ,
increases with the soil friction angle. The approximate ranges are
Soil friction angle, (deg)
30
(/ )
35
40
45
Hence drilled shafts with / (/ ) are shallow foundations, and shafts with
/ (/ ) are deep foundations with regard to the uplift. The failure surface in
soil at ultimate load as shown in figure 9.22 is for shallow foundations. For deep
foundations, local shear failure takes place, and the failure surface in soil does not extend
up to the ground surface. Based on the preceding considerations, the variation of
with / is shown in figure 9.23.
Figure 9.23 Variation of the breakout factor, , with / and soil friction angle
Following is a step-by-step procedure for the calculation of the net ultimate uplift
capacity of drilled shafts with bells in sand:
1. Determine , , and / .
2. Estimate (/ ) and hence cr .
3. If / (/ ) , obtain from figure 9. 23. Now,
4. If / > (/ ) ,
= + + 0
( ) tan
[9.35]
The last term of equation (35) is for the frictional resistance developed along the soilshaft interface from = 0 to = and is similar to equations (77 and 78 from
chapter 9). The term is the effective stress at any depth , and and are taken from
figure 9. 36b and 9.36c from chapter 9, respectively.
The net ultimate uplift capacity of drilled shafts with bell in clay can be estimated
according to the procedure outlined by Das (1980):
= ( + )
[9.36]
Where
= undrailed cohesion
= breakout factor
As in the case of , the value of increases with the embedment ratio to a critical
value of / = (/ ) and remains constant thereafter. Beyond the critical depth,
9. The critical embedment ratio is related to the undrained cohesion by
Where
= 0.107 + 2.5 7
[9.37]
is in kN/m2
In English units,
Where
= 0.738 + 2.5 7
is in lb/in2
[9.38]
Determine , , , and / .
Obtain (/ ) from equation (37) or equation (38) and obtain .
If / < (/ ) , obtain the value of from figure 9.24.
Use equation (36) to obtain .
If / > (/ ) , = 9. The magnitude of may then be obtained from
(9 + ) + ( )( )
[9.39]
= 2 tan
+ 1 + 1
Note that rather than / was used in the preceding equation because it is a deep
= = 0
( )( tan )
= + 2 tan( )2
= 4 ( )2 = 4 (1.85)2 = 2.687 m2
= 9.5 7.77 = 1.73 m
Also, from figure 9. 36b and 36c from chapter 9, for = 32 and relative density = 30%,
= 1.5 and / 0.73. Hence
Consider the drilled shaft described in example 6. If the soil above the bell is clay with an
average value of the undrianed shear strength of 95 kN/m2 , calculate the net ultimate
uplift capacity. For clay, = 17.9 kN/m3 .
9.5
1.85
= 0.734