You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices 54687

mail survey; 500 respondents for opportunities. A no action alternative, established in 1925. Until recently, the
telephone interviews). which would continue to preclude egg Migratory Bird Treaty Act prohibited
Estimated average burden hours per harvest throughout the park will also be the harvest of gull eggs, and by statute
response: 1⁄3 hour for mail survey included in the LEIS. and NPS regulations, harvest is still
respondents; 1⁄12 hour for follow-up Scoping: The National Park Service precluded within park boundaries.
telephone interview respondents. seeks input from interested groups, Legislation is necessary to authorize the
Frequency of Response: 1 time per organizations, individuals and collection of sea gull eggs in the park,
respondent. government agencies. Written and and regulations would need to be
Estimated annual reporting burden: verbal scoping comments are being promulgated to implement the gull egg
709 hours. solicited. Further information on this collection program in accordance with
Dated: September 7, 2006. LEIS process is available by contacting the provisions of Section 4 of Pub. L.
Leonard E. Stowe,
the National Park Service at Glacier Bay 106–455.
National Park and Preserve.
NPS, Information Collection Clearance Dated: August 9, 2006.
Our practice is to make comments,
Officer. Victor Knox,
including names, home addresses, home
[FR Doc. 06–7719 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am] phone numbers, and email addresses of Acting Regional Director, Alaska.
BILLING CODE 4312–52–M respondents, available for public [FR Doc. 06–7716 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
review. Individual respondents may BILLING CODE 4312–HX–M
request that we withhold their names
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and/or home addresses, etc., but if you
wish us to consider withholding this DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
information you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your National Park Service
Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement on Gull Egg Harvest by the comments. In addition, you must Notice of Availability of the Record of
Huna Tlingit in Glacier Bay National present a rationale for withholding this Decision for the Environmental Impact
Park information. This rationale must Statement on the South Denali
demonstrate that disclosure would Implementation Plan, Denali National
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. constitute a clearly unwarranted Park and Preserve, AK
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a invasion of privacy. Unsupported
Legislative Environmental Impact assertions will not meet this burden. In AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
Statement. the absence of exceptional, ACTION:Notice of Availability of the
documentable circumstances, this Record of Decision for the
SUMMARY: The National Park Service
information will be released. We will Environmental Impact Statement on the
(NPS) is preparing a Legislative
always make submissions from South Denali Implementation Plan.
Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS)
organizations or businesses, and from
on the potential harvest of gull eggs by SUMMARY: The National Park Service
individuals identifying themselves as
the Huna Tlingit in Glacier Bay National (NPS) announces the availability of the
representatives or officials of
Park. The purpose of the LEIS is to Record of Decision (ROD) for the
organizations or businesses, available
respond to Section 4 of the Glacier Bay Environmental Impact Statement on the
for public inspection in their entirety.
National Park Resource Management The LEIS is being prepared in South Denali Implementation Plan,
Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–455) which accordance with the requirements of the Denali National Park and Preserve,
requires the Secretary of Interior, in National Environmental Policy Act of Alaska.
consultation with local residents, to 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4331 et This Record of Decision documents
assess whether sea gull eggs can be seq.) and its implementing regulations the decision by the NPS, in cooperation
collected in the park on a limited basis at 40 CFR part 1500 and the process for with the State of Alaska and Matanuska-
without impairing the biological proposals for legislation (40 CFR Susitna Borough to adopt the South
sustainability of the gull population in 1506.8). Denali Implementation Plan. The Final
the park. The Act further requires that South Denali Implementation Plan and
if the study determines that the limited DATES: Comments concerning the scope Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
collection of sea gull eggs can occur of this project should be received on or was prepared cooperatively by the
without impairing the biological before November 17, 2006. The draft National Park Service, the State of
sustainability of the gull population in LEIS is projected to be available in early Alaska, and the Matanuska-Susitna
the park, the Secretary shall submit 2007. Submit electronic comments to Borough to provide specific direction
recommendations for legislation to http://parkplanning.nps.gov. Written for expanded visitor facilities and
Congress. comments may be mailed to the address recreational opportunities in the South
The proposed action alternative will provided below. Denali region until 2021. South Denali
include harvesting glaucous-winged gull FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: is defined to include the local
(Larus glaucescens) eggs by tribal Mary Beth Moss, Project Manager, communities, the Petersville Road
members of the Hoonah Indian Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, corridor, the western section of Denali
Association (HIA) under a traditional P.O. Box 140, Gustavus, AK 99826. State Park, the northern part of the
harvest strategy cooperatively produced Telephone (907) 945–3545 x31, Fax Peters Hills, lands east of the Peters
by NPS and HIA The traditional harvest (907) 945–3703. Hills to the eastern boundary of Denali
strategy would outline the methods by SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Glacier State Park, and the Parks Highway
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

which eggs could be harvested, harvest Bay National Park is the traditional corridor from Rabideaux Creek north
limits, and monitoring actions that homeland of the Huna Tlingit people. through the state park.
would be implemented to ensure that The Huna Tlingit harvested eggs at gull The NPS selected Alternative C, as
park purposes and values would remain rookeries in Glacier Bay, including the described in the FEIS. Of the two action
unimpaired. A second alternative will large nesting site on South Marble alternatives, this alternative best meets
consider more limited egg harvest Island, prior to the park being the objectives of the plan for resource

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:48 Sep 15, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM 18SEN1
54688 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices

protection, increasing quality • Provide a new destination and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
recreational and access opportunities, additional visitor opportunities in the
and preserving quality of life values in South Denali region. New facilities will National Park Service
local communities. The ROD briefly offer easily accessible visitor
discusses the background for the opportunities along the state’s main Notice of Availability for the Record of
planning effort, summarizes public highway between Anchorage and Decision on the Final Environmental
involvement during the planning Fairbanks. The visitor center will Impact Statement for the Stream
process, states the decision and provide visitors an intimate setting and Management Plan, Herbert Hoover
discusses the basis for it, describes other facilitate their connection to the National Historic Site, West Branch, IA
alternatives considered, specifies the landscape and natural resources. It will AGENCY: National Park Service,
environmentally preferable alternative, offer a range of opportunties for learning Department of the Interior.
and identifies measures adopted to and recreating, and it will provide SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
minimize potential environmental visitors of various abilities a chance to of the National Environmental Policy
harm. experience alpine and subarctic tundra Act of 1969, the National Park Service
ADDRESSES: The ROD can be found environments and opportunities to view (NPS) announces the availability of the
online at the NPS Planning, Mount McKinley and the Alaska Range. Record of Decision (ROD) on the final
Environmental and Public Comment Opportunities to view wildlife exist as Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Web site at http:// well as opportunities to spend a day or for the Stream Management Plan,
parkplanning.nps.gov/index.cfm. more at the visitor center or in the Herbert Hoover National Historic Site
Copies of the ROD are available on surrounding area. (Site), West Branch, Iowa. The Midwest
request from: Miriam Valentine, • Offer a wide variety of high-quality Regional Director approved the ROD for
National Park Service, Talkeetna Ranger recreation opportunities throughout the this final EIS on August 1, 2006.
Station, P.O. Box 588, Talkeetna, South Denali region for a variety of Specifically, the Site will adopt and
Alaska, 99676. Telephone: (907) 733– visitors. Visitors traveling in groups and implement actions described under
9102. those traveling independently can Alternative E, the preferred alternative,
benefit from the options offered. Some, in the final EIS. Under the selected
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and perhaps all, of the facilities and action, the primary strategy entails the
Mike Tranel, Chief of Planning, National opportunities should be attractive to restoration of the function of the stream
Park Service, Denali National Park and Alaska residents who recreate in the corridor and a floodwater detention area
Preserve, 240 West 5th Avenue, South Denali region. The new Parks in the upstream portion of the Park.
Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Telephone: Highway visitor center will provide The EIS considered and evaluated five
(907) 644–3611. information, orientation, interpretive alternatives to the selected action. A full
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS programs, and shelter to visitors. Public range of foreseeable environmental
prepared an EIS, as required, under the use cabins, trail systems for a wide consequences was assessed. The
National Environmental Policy Act variety of user groups, and camping overriding concern expressed by the
(NEPA) of 1969 and Council of facilities will provide options for Site and the public during the
Environmental Quality regulations (40 visitors to experience the landscape in development of this action was the
CFR part 1500). remote as well as in easily accessible protection of fundamental resources and
A Notice of Intent to prepare an settings. New trails, parking areas, boat values of the Site. Alternative E—
environmental impact statement, launch, and potential docking facility Provide 50-Year Flood Protection—is
published in the Federal Register in will provide increased access to rivers the selected alternative since it best
February 2004 (69 FR 72513), formally and public lands in the South Denali meets the objectives of the Site. The
initiated the NPS planning and EIS region. Together these developments preferred alternative will not result in
effort. A Draft EIS was issued in should accommodate the visitor growth the impairment of resources and values.
September 2005 (70 FR 55414). A anticipated for the South Denali region The ROD includes a statement of the
Federal Register notice announcing the over the next 15 to 20 years. decision made, synopses of other
availability of the Final EIS was • Create economic and employment alternatives considered, the basis for the
published by the U.S. Environmental opportunities for local residents through decision, the rationale for why the
Protection Agency on May 5, 2006, establishment of a new visitor selected action is the environmentally
commencing the required 30-day no- destination. Residents of south central preferred alternative, a finding of no
action period (71 FR 26498). The Final Alaska, in particular, will benefit from impairment of Site resources and
EIS describes and analyzes the improved recreational access with this values, and an overview of public
environmental impacts of two action alternative. Rural character may be involvement in the decisionmaking
alternatives and a no-action alternative. negatively affected, particularly for the process.
The NPS selected Alternative C, as community of Trapper Creek. Negative FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
described in the Final EIS. The impacts will be partially mitigated by Superintendent, Stream Management
emphasis of the selected alternative is to measures in the plan to protect the Plan Record of Decision, Herbert Hoover
enhance access and recreational scenic qualities of adjacent road National Historic Site, P.O. Box 607,
opportunities throughout the South corridors. The agencies will continue to West Branch, Iowa 52358, or by calling
Denali region for a variety of visitors, address local interests by seeking public 319–643–2541. Copies of the final EIS
including Alaskans, independent input during future planning and and ROD are available upon request
travelers, and package tour travelers,
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

implementation efforts. from the above address.


while at the same time protecting the
important resource and community Dated: July 31, 2006. Dated: August 1, 2006.
values in the area, including the rural Victor Knox, Ernest Quintana,
lifestyle of local residents. Acting Regional Director. Regional Director, Midwest Region.
Major actions of the selected [FR Doc. 06–7714 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 06–7715 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
alternative include: BILLING CODE 4310–PF–M BILLING CODE 4310–70–M

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:18 Sep 15, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM 18SEN1

You might also like