Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Laughter
Author(s): Max Beerbohm
Source: The North American Review, Vol. 214, No. 788 (Jul., 1921), pp. 39-49
Published by: University of Northern Iowa
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25120778
Accessed: 18-09-2015 05:08 UTC
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of Northern Iowa is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The North American
Review.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LAUGHTER
BY MAX BEERBOHM
M.
.
Bergson,
. well,
in his
he
on
this
says
theme,
essay
none
I
of
but
these,
though
well-known
says many
things;
of
of me.
these
out
going
with
fashionable
of
them.
fashion,
About
even
and
ten
years
worst
the
rather,
philosophers?or
I never manage
Somehow
seem
I don't
when
ago,
to
able
everyone
cope
suddenly
me
after
all,
of a man
an
absolute
or a woman,
a fairly
to me
will
present
fatuous
thoughts.
altogether
fool.
I am
Yet
a place
surely
or an event,
intelligent
some
and
image,
to me
Come
not
that.
real or fictitious;
listener.
will
in
Any
stir me
some
such
to not
grievous
and
if you
want
to
try
those
theories
on
someone
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
who
40
will
them
confirm
luminously
a hang-dog
with
warn
air,
or powerfully
rend
am
I
not
that
you
I must,
man.
them,
your
any
howsoever
philosophy,
is no
new,
better
than
another.
or
the
two,
notion
vaguest
of what
are
you
at.
driving
for
the
Bergson
sake
of
sat
down
such
shorn
and
as myself,
lambs
wrote
all
doubtless,
But
about?Laughter.
a coarse
I utter
and
again,
At
ago,
years
Twenty
content
is not
of?Laughter.
years
ago,
should
have professed
man
ten
peal
to be
very
nor
young,
have
smiled.
even
smiled.
laughed,
and
A very young
a young
man
to
but
smiles
surrender,
joyous
of mature
token
give
criticism.
It may be that in the early ages of this world there was much
more laughter than is to be heard now, and that aeons hence
be
will
laughter
always, mildly,
as
to mankind's
slightly,
past
and
smiling.
future
mostly
and
best
times
look
solemn,
smiles
and
obsolete,
But
than
universal?everyone,
whereas
men.
to observe
in the club-room
old men
And
or men
of middle
you
at
age
laugh loud
and
gayest
achieve
more
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LAUGHTER 41
a pot?
under
us
Let
is no
There
cheerier
of what
to disapprove
more
because
it has
were
But
sound.
of fools because we
one
is absurd
It
quiet.
a good
so.
do
it to be the laughter
no
envies,
out
passed
sit
or to wish
of
our
possession.
And
who makes
as
laughter
M.
Bergson
praise
As
we
of
nowadays,
proud,
me
That
laugh.
a matter
of
laughing,
and
is a bad
sign.
course.
I no longer take
even
realize,
it is.
to anyone
grateful
after
reading
I am qualified
to
it.
to what
live
the
I want
Personally,
among
precious
in, different
whom
people
is most
men
sea
the
hold
the
different
whom
depresses,
sea always?some
accessories
opinions.
mountains
not
populous
to the world
are
There
exhilarate.
edge
of
it
for choice; and with it sunshine, and wine, and a little music.
My friend on the mountain yonder is of tougher fibre and sterner
of the sea's laxity and instability, has no
outlook, disapproves
ear
for music
as a rather
and
enervating
no
palate
for
institution,
the
like
and regards
the sun
grape,
central
a
in
house.
heating
What
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
42
Abbey,
more
leaving
a million
than
over
pounds
Many
an
I wrote
ago
in which
essay
on
scorn
I poured
the fun purveyed by the music halls, and on the great public for
which that fun was quite good enough.
I take that callow scorn
was
I fancy that the fun itself
back.
better than it seemed to
me, and might not have displeased me if it had been wafted to me
in private, in the presence of a few friends. A public crowd, be
cause
of
lack
insulates
than
strangers
I become
of
broad
absorbs
impersonal
Amidst
me.
humanity
the guffaws
If these
grave.
unnaturally
in me,
rather
a thousand
of
people
were
the
In music
not peculiar.
see
but?not
laughter,
helpless,
me.
dissolve
and
suffering,
And
in this
respect,
at any
not
laughter,
convalescent,
gradually
see
strong
dangerously
rate,
I am
hear loud
men
weak,
relapsing.
were
schoolrooms
for us,
and
the
comedians
were
our
school
masters, how much less talent would be needed for giving us how
much more joy! Even in private and accidental intercourse, few
are
the men
whose
ble, to paroxysms
humor
of mirth.
can
reduce
us,
I will wager
be we
never
so suscepti
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LAUGHTER 43
world's best laughter is laughter at, not with.
set
ridiculous.
the
revere
but we
to his
to his
that
Some
of our
good
Of
heavens!
it
are!
they
struck
by
source
as we
in
anything
his
with
of laughter.
we laugh
older
grow
are gathered
to their fathers.
we
coevals
for
be
but
may,
know,
very
great,
ought
we can't
esteem
them so.
we
men
The
the
the monarch
is incongruous
is a rich
of
lose through
priceless
are we
sharply
is always much)
sense
pupils,
staff?how
like subjection,
Reverence,
lies one of the reasons
why
greatness.
And herein
extreme
so great
esteemed
laughter
I know
not
in any
a more
annals
satisfac
tory example
Both
Byron.
early
surely
thing,
schoolmaster
editor
the more
a man,
(and there
when,
is a good
it is the people
our
Reverence
less.
most
touch
that
The
courtiers,
him
us
Freedom
moments.
golden
to his
we
over
in authority
And
on an evening
in the spring
to Mr.
Rogers'
assembly"
of
1813,
house
they went
in St. James's
some
"from
Place
and
were
of
as made
laughter
the
of
living
poets.
memorable.
(strange as itmay
so very
evening
too, Mr.
Luckily,
Luckily
Rogers
ever
the
kind of man, the coldly and quietly suave kind of man, with
whom you don't take liberties, if you can help it?with whom,
if you can't help it, to take liberties is in itself a wildly exhilarating
act. And he had just received a presentation
copy of Lord
Thurloe's
latest
book,
Poems
on
Several
Occasions.
The
two
need
by
its author,
as
one
of
the
poems
panegyric
was
a warm,
on himself.
We
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
and
were,
44
narrative
however"?the
care
demure
so heartily
we both
or
as
to stop us.
can
charm
from Tom
the
compromise
for even
in nonsense
agreed,
as well
was,
an added
has
offend
far gone
Rogers?"too
poem
to
not
this
The
still-surviving
in which
eulogy,
line of the
opening
'When
recollect,
Moore's
o'er
Rogers
this
to read it aloud;?but
labor bent'; and Lord Byron undertook
to
he found it impossible
Our
get beyond the first two words.
a
now
to
increased
had
such
that
could
pitch
laughter
nothing
restrain it. Two or three times he began; but no sooner had the
'When Rogers' passed his lips, than our fit burst out
words
even Mr. Rogers himself, with all his feelings of our
afresh,?till
to
not
it impossible
found
injustice,
us;
join
and we
at
were,
last,
to
needed
to
perfection
give
this
room
old
that
revisit
ghosts
scene.
heart-warming
and
(without,
I hope,
inconven
so than
not more
and Rogers
them was
Alas,
the notion
someone
have
that more
joining
I cannot
however
scene,
would
does
laughter?as
not
give
we
were
a pang
years
I do.
than gently.
at it.
that
a hundred
than
in their
join in it more
vividly,
to Byron
seemed
us
the
and Moore
To
sense
from
away
imagine
or
of being,
we
weren't.
my
fancy
posts itself outside the Temple's gate in Fleet Street, and there,
at a late hour of the night of May
10th, 1773, observes a gigantic
but
man
old
having no one with him to share
laughing wildly,
Not that he is alone; but the young
and aggrandize his emotions.
man beside him laughs only in politeness and is inwardly puzzled,
even
shocked.
Boswell
has
a keen,
an
exquisitely
keen,
scent
for comedy, for the fun that is latent in fine shades of character;
but imaginative burlesque, anything that borders on lovely non
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LAUGHTER 45
sense,
he was
account
his
not
formed
of what
to savor.
All
the more
to the moment
led up
when
one
does
Johnson
in
revel
"to
sup
port himself, laid hold of one of the posts at the side of the foot
pavement, and sent forth peals so loud that in the silence of the
night his voice seemed to resound from Temple to Fleet Ditch."
No
evening
ever
had
an
unlikelier
ending.
The
omens
were
families,"
and
succession."
was
on "the
great
his
listeners,
Among
and pro
dignity
as it happened,
was a gentleman for whom Mr. Chambers had that day drawn up
a will devising his estate to his three sisters. The news of this
in wrath.
might have been expected to make Johnson violent
But
no,
for
some
reason
he
grew
violent
only
that gentleman
in
laughter,
The Testator
and
and
46
were
paroxysms
too
much
for
and
he
Street
no more.
could
Echoes of that huge laughter come ringing down the ages. But
is there also perhaps a note of sadness for us in them?
John
came of his inherent melancholy;
son's endless sociability
he
could not bear to be alone; and his mirth was but a mode of
escape from the dark thoughts within him. Of these the thought
of death was the most dreadful to him, and the most insistent.
He
was
forever
how
wondering
death
come
would
to him,
and
seems
too,
would
drawn
reservation
have
of Gladstone.
a great
euthanasia;
been
as characteristic
But
to die of laughter?this,
and
I think
of John
that
for Johnson
to have died thus, that night in Fleet Street, would have been a
he was
Well,
grand ending to "a life radically wretched."
destined
to outlive
another
decade;
too,
not
to one
of all
the
and
selfishly,
can
who
wish
characters
in romance
has
such
an
Lest
he
should
miss
one word,
he would
have
mastered
But the final words would have been the signal for
himself.
release of all the roars pent up in him; the welkin would have
rung; the roars, belike, would have gradually subsided in dread
ful
rumblings
of more
than
utterable
or
conquerable
mirth.
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LAUGHTER 47
Thus
dramatic
secundum
fitness,
christom
life have
ipsius
been
never
He
naturam.
off with
rounded
left to babble
have been
any
his
should
it had been
child."
the more
"tell"
because
startlingly
of the noble
of charac
weight
ter behind them: they are the better because he makes them.
In Falstaff there isn't this final incongruity and element of sur
Falstaff is but a sublimated sample of "the funny man."
prise.
We cannot, therefore, laugh so greatly with him as with Johnson.
(Nor even at him; because we are not tickled somuch by the weak
of a character
points
we have
no reverence
Falstaff
has
we
mean
whose
points
to
trying
are
all weak
because
Still,
us.)
us.
to convulse
the power
indubitably
on
restraint
impose
also
ones;
I don't
the Fourth.
No
in reading
Henry
of laughter.
These
alas, can thrill us to extremities
whose
be a living man
if the mirthmaker
jests we
are
ever
page,
printed
are ours only
convulsed
hear as they come fresh from his own lips. All I claim for
Falstaff is that he would be able to convulse us if he were alive
and
accessible.
can
induce
Few,
state.
this
as
To
master
have
are
said,
and
dissolve
to
by
becomes
Laughter
must
be
no
save
no man
extreme
for
pauses
of
in virtue
only
recovery.
the
humorists
to give
us,
laughter,
rare
if it be
us
the
is a success
staying
consecutive.
humor,
Touch-and-go
who
power.
There
how
one
tion keeping
Only
after
pace with
so can he
without
another,
exhaust
utterance.
He
must
He must
be
pause.
have
inven
inexhaustible.
us.
I would
praise.
There
are many
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
other
48
as he,
is so diffident
one
in him.
much"
people
Many
faintly
one
No
cronies.
self-postponing.
of his
Many
his
among
as
have met
thing
memorable
no
"any
suspecting
too?
acquaintances?friends,
null
and
enough
us
with
cigarettes,
razor.
A whole
full
darkness.
and
has
There
come
expatiator
hour and more
And
be wasted
will
a flame
in the murk;
of ques
new
some
of
the merits
may
asker
between
on
then?something
a spark
mere
sometimes?a
in such
patent
humdrum
have
happened.
now,
of a
presage
elastic
dumb.
idea
or
Comus
express?
And he ismellifluous.
conjures
up
scene,
were
he
an
be
would
His
takes
on
eloquent
a peculiar
even
and
richness
he
imagines,
he
creates,
giving
you
not
a person,
but
a type,
a synthesis; and not what anywhere has been, but what anywhere
as one feels, for all the absurdity of it, just would
might be?what,
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
LAUGHTER 49
He knows his world well, and nothing human is alien to
him, but certain skeins of life have a special hold on him, and he
on them.
In his youth he wished to be a clergyman; and over
the clergy of all grades and denominations
his genius hovers and
be.
and
swoops
ranges
with
special
mastery.
Lawyers
he
loves
less; yet the legal mind seems to lie almost as wide-open to him as
the sacerdotal; and the legal manner
in all its phases he can
In the minds
of journalists,
diverse
unerringly
burlesque.
so
not
at
he
less
is
of
the
wild
that
home,
journalists,
thoroughly
contingencies
imagined by him there is none about which he
cannot reel off an oral "leader" or "middle" in the likeliest style,
and with as much ease as he can preach a High Church or a Low
Church sermon on it. Nor are his improvisations limited by prose.
If a theme calls for nobler treatment, he becomes an unflagging
fountain of blank verse.
Or again, he may deliver himself in
no
form of utterance that comes amiss to him
rhyme. There is
for interpreting the human comedy, or for broadening the farce
can stop
into which that comedy is changed by him. Nothing
him
when
from
once
he
to
strength
is in the vein.
strength,
while
No
his
him.
appeals move
audience
is more
He goes
and more
piteously debilitated.
What a gift to have been endowed with! What a power to
And how often I have envied Comus!
wield!
But this envy
has
never
a
much
root.
taken
He
laugher.
Incomparable
is vintner,
laughter-giver,
not
toper.
he
is not
I would
not
us.
be given
Max
vol.
ccxiv.?no.
788
Beerbohm.
This content downloaded from 200.16.5.202 on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 05:08:23 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions