, , 22

. ,

. , , ,
. (Claus Roxin), ,
. ,
,
. , - ,
. , ,
. , ,
. , ,
. , ,
. , ,
. , ,
. , ,

.

.

11000 , 22

-mail: dekan@pa.edu.yu

300

INPRESS,
.
1996. ,
. I, . 1 (1996)

ISSN 0354-8872

UDK 351.74

,
POLICE ACADEMY, BELGRADE SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO

SCIENCE SECURITY POLICE

, 2006.

/ARTICLES


..................................................... 9
THE ROLE OF POLICE IN CASES OF SEXUAL ABUSE
OF CHILDREN AND THE YOUTH ................................................................................................ 30

, .
.............................................. 31
CONCEPTS AND STRATEGIES OF FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM ..................................... 50

........................... 51
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF NEW LAW OF DELICT .......................................................... 73

............................................. 75
CRIMES AGAINST SEXUAL INTEGRITY IN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION
OF REPUBLIKA SRPSKA .................................................................................................................. 96

..................................................................................... 97
NOTION OF NON-LETHAL WEAPONS .....................................................................................108

......................................109
HUMAN TRAFFICKING AS A FORM OF ORGANIZED CRIME
MAIN PHENOMENOLOGIAL FEATURES .................................................................................130

............................................................................................................131
INTELLIGENCE CYCLE ..................................................................................................................146



................................................................................................149
ARMED UPRISINGS ........................................................................................................................166

...........................................................167
NOTION AND FORMS OF ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION IN
MARKET-ORIENTED BUSINESS PRACTICE OF THE EU .....................................................187

-a
.................................................................................................................189
PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE NATO ARRANGEMENT
IN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM ......................................................................................208
...............................................................................................................209

 , . XII, . 1, 9 30, 2006.

343.85:343.541

.
,
:
,
o,
. , , ,
. . ,
, ,
, ,
.
.
,

. : , (
),
, .
.
, ,
, , - , .

[]

: , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , .

,
. ,
,
. ,

. ,
.
: 1. , 2.
. , ,

, .
.
.
, 100
45 .
, .

.

, , . ,
. ,

, .
, ,

.

. , ,
,
:
[]

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.

;


;

;
;

;
;
;
() ,
;
;
;

;
, ;

();
;
;
(
),

.

[]

1.

, , ,
. ,
, :
1. ;
2.
;
3. ;
4. , ;
5. - ,
6.
.
,
,
,
.

.
, . ,
, 10% .

. ,
, , ,
60% .
,
. ,
.
.

.
. -
.
.
.
[]

,
.

.
,
.

.
.
(, , ) .

.
. .
,
. ,
.
.
2.

.
,
.
,
( )
. ,
.

,
( ), , ,
.
,
,

[]

( ) ().
(, ,
, , , )
.
,
. ,
,
,
, , .
,
:
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. ;
7. ;
8. ;
9. ;
10. (. .);
11. () ;
12. ;
13. (),
() ;
14. ;
15. ( ),
16. ( , ).
,

.

: ( )? :
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
[]

4. ;
5. ;
6. ;
7. ;
8. ;
9. ;
10. ;
11. ,
12. .
, .

, ,
.
, ,

. ,
.
, 20. 45. .
. .
,
. .
,

. ,
, .
(, ) ,
:
1. ,
,
2. .
(modus
perandi):
1. ;
2. ;
3. ( );
4. , , ,
;

[]

5. ,
;
6.
, ,
,


;
7. (,
, , , , , , )

;
8.
,
9. ,
, , .

.


:
1. ;
2. (, ) (
);
3.
;
4. ;
5. ;
6. , ;
7.
;
8. ;
9.
;
[]

10.
,
11. .

, ,
,
, :
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. ;
7. ,
8. .

:
.
,
,

.
:
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. , ;
7. ;
8. ,
9. ;
10. ;
11. ,
12. .

[]

3.

:
1.
(),
2. .
3.1.

.
.

,
, . ,
,
-

.

, ,

.

,
, ,
:
1. ;
2.
;
3. (modus operandi)
;
[]

4.
;
5.
;
6. ,
(-),
7.

.
,

:
1. ();
2.
;
3. : 1. ? 2. ,
4.
.
3.2.

(),

, :
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. ;
7. ,
8. .

, , ,
( )
,
.

[]

3.2.1.

.
:
1. ;
2. ;
3. , ,
,
;
4. (,
, ), ,
;
5.
;
6.
;
7.
;
8. (
, , .);
9. ,
10.
.
3.2.2.

:
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. ( ),
7. :
, .

[]

3.2.3.

,
, :
1.
, ,
2.
;
3.

;
4. ;
5. ,
;
6.
( );
7.
( ):
8. ;
9.
- ;
10. ;
11. ,
,
! ,
12. , , , ,
, .
3.2.4.

, ,
.

():
1.
;

[]

2.
;
3. ,
4.
.
3.3.

.
,
:
1.
;
2. ;
3. (modus operandi) ;
4. ;
5.
,
6.
.

, ,
,
:
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. ;
7. ;
8. ;
9. ( ),
10. .

[]

3.4.

.

.
. ,

,

.
, ,
,
, .
,

. .
,

. ,
.
, :
, ,
, !

,

. , ,
1. ,

:
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
1

. , , , , 2003.

[]

4. ;
5. ,
6. .
, ( )
. ,
( ) (MOS)
.
,
.

. , ,
, ,
.
4.

. ,

.
, :
1. ;
2. ;
3. ,
4. :
4.1. ,
4.2. ,
4.3.
! .

[]

5.

,
24
.
,
:
1. ;
2. , ,
,
3.
;
4.
;
5. , ,
;
6.
, , ;
7. -;
8. ;
9. (, , ,
, -, , , .),
10. ()
,
. 2
6.

.
:
1. ;
2. ;
2

. , , , ,
1997, . 154158.

[]

3. ;
4.
;
5.
. : !;
6. ;
7. ;
8.
,
9. ,
.
,

.

. ,
,

. , :
1. ;
2.
;
3.
,
4.
.

:
1. ,
;
2.

,
,
,
3.
,
[]

.
6.1.

,
.
:
1.
;
2. ,
,
3. .

:
1.
;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. - ,
7. .

:
1. ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. ;
5. ;
6. ;
7. ,
8. .

, :
1. ;

[]

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

;
;
;
;
,
.

7.

, ,
.
, .
,
.
, , ,
-.
, ,
.
.
( )
XXI .
.
. ,
, .

,
.
,
: ,
.
,


,
().
( ,
, .),
.
[]

. ,
, :
1. , ;
2.
(modus operandi);
3. - ,
;
4. ;
5. - -
;
6.
, , , , ;
7. ;
8.
;
9.
;
10.
.

:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

, . (1998), - 1, , .
, . (2003), , ,
,
, . (1997), ,
, ,
, . (2005), ,
, ,
, ., , . (1999), - 2, , .

[]

THE ROLE OF POLICE IN CASES OF SEXUAL ABUSE

OF CHILDREN AND THE YOUTH
Professor Ostoja Krsti PhD
Police Academy, Belgrade
Abstract: Comparing the number of cases of sexually abused children with the number of other sexual-related crimes, we can conclude that this kind of sexual abuse
should not be underestimated, as it can seem to those claiming that these are only
sporadic crimes. In addition to this, this is characteristic for urban environment primarily. Police in urban environment play decisive role in preventing and suppressing these deviances. In order to deal with this kind of delicts, we require a detailed
analytical approach, timely observation of potential perpetrators, knowledge of their
modus operandi, detection of potential victims, education of citizens to identify perpetrators, procedure with perpetrators and their victims and many other relevant
issues related to this problem. One of the preconditions in implementation of such a
conceived preventive programs is adequate police training and education of all participants in prevention and suppression of sexual abuse of children. Moreover, it is
necessary to build an entire system of informing in order to activate all associations
of citizens and predict all available forms of communication within a local community. The goal is clear: supervision and control of places where potential perpetrators appear, educating citizens on their modus operandi (delinquent tactics), giving
adequate information to children so that they would avoid potential perpetrators,
timely reporting of every case to the police and adequate response and acting in
cases of run-away or missing children.
There is no doubt that there is great preventive potential in inadequately used possibilities of the local community. It is therefore necessary for the local community
to organize in an appropriate manner, both professionally and socially, against this,
unfortunately increasingly frequent problem with the goal of preventive and repressive action, primarily its prevention.

[]

 , . XII, . 1, 31 50, 2006.

343.85:323.28

. .

,
.

:
() .
( .),
.
,
,
, (
) . , ,

. ,
,
.
: , , , ,
, , .

[]

 , .

11.
2001. ,
, ,

. ,
, ,

XX , ,
,
- [, 2005].

() .
,
,
, ,
(, , , .).

. ,
:
( )
- ,
( - 11.
2001. ),
( - 11. 2001. )?
e
, , ,
. e
, , ,
, e
, , , ,
, ,
, , . ,
[]

-
,

,
() .
,
,

, - .

,
.
.

, ,
.

.
,
, ,
.
,
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
,
. .

. ,
[-, 2005].
,

[]

 , .

.
,
? : , ,
,
, ,
, ?
,
,
- ,
( )
.

- , ,
. , ,
,
,
.
, ,



().
.
- , ,
,
,
,
.
, , , ,
, ,
, .

, []

()
:
,
, - ;
,
;
,
, -
, ,

[, 2005]. ,
,
(
),
-, , -
() ,
, .
, - . ,
- e
(, ,
) ,
. ,
, , o
, . o

,
. , [,
2004].
,
,

[]

 , .

,
( )
,
.
,
, .
, .


, , . ,
,
,
,
.

, ,
. ,
. ,

( ),
. ,

. ,
,
.

, ,
,
,
,
(13 .). ,
,
1996 8
, (Financial Action Task Force). ,
[]

(La Gomera Declaration),

,
,
, .

1373 .

,
.
,

.
, .

. ,
,


.
, : , , ,
K
, , , ( -) , , ,
,
.
, ,
, ,
,
,
. , ,
(European security strategy),
12. 2003. , 10567

.

[]

 , .

, .
,
.
, - .

,
.
.
, European Arrest Warrant
-

,
. ,
, .
10567,
: .
-
. ,
, -
. ,
2001.
,
.
,
[ , 2005].


( ) ,
(
),
,
, ,
.

11. 2001. , :
[]

(Network of
Counterterrorist Liaison Officers CTLOs),
(Police Working Group on Terrorism
PWGT), (Counterterrorism Working Party COTER),
( )
(Justice and Home Affairs or Police Ministers JHA).
, 1999. ,
,
. ( Serious Crime 5 SC5) :

, (Analytical
Work Files AWFs), -
,


, ()
. ,
, :
,

.
11. 2001. ,
, -,
-
.
:
,
,
(Counter-Terrorism Task Force)
(CODEXTER).
, -

[]

 , .

.
,
,

, - ,
, ,
, ,
- ,


. ,
-
[, 2003].

K
, ,
.

,
,
,

, .
,
, ,
.

, ,
.
11. 2001.

.
, 1985. ,
. ,
[]

(FBI). FBI o a
,
. , FBI ,
1989. [, 2005].
11. 2001. ,

, - .


. ,
, ,
,
. ,
,
. ,
(),

.
- -,
, :
(The National Security Strategy),
-a, , , ,
,
, ,
, -
,
- [, 2004].
- ,
, .
- ,
. ,
, : (

[]

 , .

, - ),

(). ,
,
[, 2005]. ,

, , , , ,
.
4D (DEFEAT , DENY ,
DIMINISH DEFEND , ).

.
, .
,
,
. ,

,
.

, .
,

.
,

. ,
-,

,
-
,
- .
-
(Department of Homeland Security).

,
: ,
[]

- ,
.
:
, ,
.
,
,
(intelligence community). -
(Cyber Security
Enhancment Act, 2002),
[, 2005].
- ,

. ,
:

. -
.

,
. ,
,
,
[, 2005].
()
- .
, ,
,

[, 2005].

-.
.
11. 2001. ,
.
,

[]

 , .

,
( , )


.

()

. ,
-, ,
(
) -.

( 1300 1997.
24. 2000. ), ,
,
,
3. 1998. ,
, 1. 2006. , 1. 2007. .
: , , ,
,
.
, ,
,
.
,
, ,
,
, , ,
.
,

.
[]

,
, , - .
- .
,
, ,
.

, .
:


,
,

,
, ,

,
,
.
, 2006.

(). ,
,
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
, , ,
, , , .
, () ,
.

[]

 , .

( ), 1267 15. 1999. , 1269
19. 1999. , 1373 28. 2001. , 1368
12. 2005. , 1535 26. 2004. , 1540
28. 2004. , 1566 8. 2004. , 1617 29.
2005. 1624 14. 2005. ,
. ,
,
,
,
,
.
, ,
,

.
, ,
.
, ,

11. 2001. .
11. 2001.
,

,
,
- . ,
,
() ,
- .
, ,
,
-
, , ,
. , -.
[]

, ,
, 1993. .
, ,
-
.

, ,
. ,

,
,
- .

,
, .
(.,
).
-
,
,
. , ,
. ,

- ,
(
) .
, ,
,
,

, . , ,
2006. ,
. ,
20. 2006. , 45

.
.

[]

 , .

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

11.
12.

13.

14.

15.

[]

. (2004),
; , 22. 29. 2004, . 2223.
. (2004), , : Alexandrian Press.
. . (2005),
; , , 27.
Gregory F. (2003), The EUs role in the war on terror Terrorism and
insurgencu; Janes Intelligence Review, vol. 15, n 01, january 2003, p. 1417.
(2005),
2004, .,
;
, . 12, , . 946.
. (2005),
; , 2, , . 91108.
Kozlow C. (2000), Counter Terrorism, Alexandria, VA: Janes Information
Group.
. (2005), , : .
. (200),
, : .
: ,
(2003);
, 5,
2003.
Pillar P. R.( 2001), Terrorism and US Foreign Policy, Washington: Brookings
Institution.
. (2005), ;
, , . 12, ,
. 348370.
. (2005), , .
., , 2005;
; . 12, , . 93111.
. (2003), (
); ; , .
. (2005), ; , 2, , . 3181.

CONCEPTS AND STRATEGIES OF FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM

Professor Milan MiloeviPhD
Police Academy, Belgrade
Goran D. Mati,
Ministry of Defense of Serbia and Montenegro
Abstract: The paper presents conceptual and strategic approach to counteracting terrorism as one of the greatest threats to planetary (global) system of security. We have
started from legal documents related to foreign and security policies (conventions,
and similar), which are intended for establishing of a generally and internationally
accepted concept and strategy of counteracting transnational terrorism. There is
also the analysis of the essential question whether terrorism should be treated as
a non-military risk and threat, i.e. as crime through establishing of strategies of
institutional and legislative opposition at international, regional and national level,
or whether it should be treated as a military challenge and threat (the problem of
collective and national defense) through establishing of the concept of preventive war against terrorism. Starting from that, we have presented several mutually
various regional and national approaches to creation of security policy of fighting
against terrorism, as a key sign-post and foundation of practical fight against terrorism. These are the concepts of the European Union, the United States of America
and the Russian Federation, with a short survey of the current situation in Serbia
and Montenegro.

[]

 , .

[]

 , . XII, . 1, 51 73, 2006.

343.232 (497.11) (094.5)

.
,
: 2005.

, .
,

,
.


, ,
1. 2007. .

,
: ,
,
, . ,
. ,
,
,
,
, ,
.

[]

.


. 1989.
, 1974. ,
,
: (
1977. ) (
1989. ).
1947. ,
1951. ( ), 1973.
1979. .1
, ,
,
,
. ,




,
,

.
.
,
, ,
, .
, ,
,
,
.
,

.
1

.: , , 2004, . 12 .

[]

,
2

,
,
.

.


. ,

,



.

,

. ,
,

.
14. 2005. ,
29. 2005. . ,
308. 1. 2007. .
,
.

.
,
( , ,
),
,
,
2

,
, , 2002, . 29 .
[]

29. 2006. ( ).

,

.
,
1. 2007.
.

. , ,
.3
,
,4
5
( )
,
,6
,
,7
.8 ,
,

.9
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

.: , , . 1011/1986,
. 43 .
.: , , ,
2002, . 5 .
.: ,
, , 2002, . 33. .
Varinard A., Joly-Sibuet E.: Les problmes juridiques et pratiques poss par la diffrence ntre droit
pnal et droit administratif pnal, Revue internationale de droit pnal, No. 12/1988, str. 189 i sl.
Weigend T.: The legal and practical problems posed by the difference between Criminal Law and Administrative Penal Law, Revue internationale de droit pnal, No. 12/1988, str. 67. i sl.
., .: , , 2005, . 42.
Delmas-Marty M.: Diffrenciation des systmes juridiques de sanctions dominante pnale ou administrative, Revue internationale de droit pnal, No. 12/1988, str. 27 i sl.

[]

,

, .10

. ,11
,
,

, .

,12
,
.
( 1947),
( 1951), (
1958, 1977. 1973, 1979.
1989) ,


13.
,
,
.
,
,
(
),14
, .

( )
10 .: , , 2004, . 62 .; .:
, , 1989, . 17 .
11 .: , , 2000, . 39 .
12 .: op. cit., . 26.
13 . .: ,
, , , 2006, . 67.
14 ., .:
, , 2005, . 3536.
[]

( ),15
. ,
, .
,

,
.


,
.16

. , ,
.

,
, ,

,17 ,
,
.
,
, ,

() ,
. ,

.
1989. ,
, ( ,
),
,
15 .: , , , , 2005, . 112113.
16
,
( 2) ( 14),
.
17 .: op. cit., . 146. 148.

[]

.18

.


1989.
.19

,
,
.20 , ,

.

( ) ,
.

,
.

.

,
, , ,
,

.
,
: 1) ; 2) ; 3)
; 4) ,
18 .: , ,
, 2002, . 20.
19 ., .: , , 2005. . 80.
20 .:
, ,
, , 2006, . 43.
[]

, 5)
.
.
,
, ,
,

.
(
),

,

.
,


( 21) ( 29).
,
.
,
(actiones liberae in causa)

,
.



.21

.

,
,
,

21 .: op. cit., . 184185.

[]

.22 ,
,
.

.
,
. ,

.23



.




.24
,

. ( )
,
. ,
, ,
,

.
,
,
.

22 .: , ,
, 2002, . 18.
23 .: ,
, .1011/1986, . 17.
24 . .:
, ,
, , 2006, . 45.
[]

.25
,
,
, ,

.

,
.
: 1)
( )
, 2)
,
,
. ,
, .

, , .



.


.
.26

. ,
.
25 .: ,
,
, , 1979, . 110.
26 . .:
, ,
, , 2006, . 56.

[]

, ,
.
.
,
,
.
,

. ,

,
,
.
,

.

( )
,

. , ,
: 1)
, , ,
,

, ,
, 2)
,
,
10%
,

.
.

( )
,

,
, .
[]

,
.
,
.
. ,

.

.
,
.
, , ,27
,28 ,29
30
.31
,
, .32
.


.
.
, ,
, , ,

, .
.

,
.
27 Nouveau Code pnal, Mode demploi, Documents dirig par J. C. Zyliberstein, Paris, 1993, str. 205.
28 Rayer L., Wadsworth S.: The Dutch Penal Code, Littelton, Colorado, 1997, str. 51.
29 . . . : ,
, 1996, . 102.
30 Walford R.: General Civil Penal Code, Norwegian Ministry of Justice, Oslo, 1995, str. 5.
31 - ., .: , , 1998, . 105. .
32 .:
, ,
, , 2006, . 55.

[]

.
,
,
.

.

. ,


,
,

.

.

, , ,
: 1)
,
; 2) ,


; 3) ,
; 4)
,
,
, , 5)
,
,
.
, , ,
,
. ,
.
.
.

, ,
[]

( , ,
,
, ,

), :
,
,

.
,
, ,
,
.33
.
.
, o 15.000
o 30 .
,
.


.
,
. ,

,
.

,
34
. ,
()
33 .:
, ,
, , 2006, . 57.
34 .: ,
,
, , 1979, . 279.

[]

.
,
( ),
,
, ( ),
.
( )
( ,
).
.

.
: ,
,
,
,
,
,
.35



.
. ,

.
,
,
( ),
, ,
.

35 .: ,
, , , 2006, . 93.
[]

.36

,
.
, ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
.37


.38

,39
, 40 , -
, , .
,

( 5. 6) .41
36 . .: ,
, , , 2006, . 19 .
37 , , .:
, , 2005, . 1130; .: , , 2003, .
99138.
38 .: ,
, , , 2006, . 5;

(
, , 1979,
, , 1979, . 2 ).
39 .: - -
, ,
, , 1979, . 77 .
40 .: ,
,
, , 1979, . 127 .
41 ,
, , 2002, . 29 .

[]

, ,
, . ,
,
,
,
.
, ,
,
, -
,

. , ,
( , , ,
, ,
) ,
.

. ,

,
. ,

,
.
, ,
.
.
, ,


.


.
, ,
.
, :
1) ,
; 2)
[]

,
, 3)
.
,
, ,
, .

,
,
,
, . ,

,
,
.
,
, .
, ,


.
(
)
.
,

. ,

.

. : , ,
.

, ,
. ,
,
.
( )
.
[]

. , ,
,

, , .


.
, 1,2 /
, ,

.
,
.
,
, ,
.
,
,

.
,
,

.

, .
,
.

,
, -
. , ,
,
.
( ),


[]

.
. ,
,
.

(
)

.

,42
, .
,
,
. ,
,
,

.


.
,
: 1)
; 2)
; 3)

; 4)
; 5)
; 6) ; 7)
,
8)
. (
)
.
( )
42 .: , , 2000, . 145.

[]

: 1) ;
2)
, 3)
.



.
,
,
,
,

,
.

,
,
.

,
( ),

( ).

,
. ,


.43 ,

,
.

.
43 ., .: ,
, , 2005, . 120.
[]

,
,

.
,
. ,
,

, -
. ,
, ,

.
,
.
, , , ,

. ,
,
. ,

, ,
.
,
.

, .


.
,
,

.

[]

.44 ,

,
, .


,

.


.

44 .:

1. 2007.
( ),
, , , 2006, . 153 .
[]

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF NEW LAW OF DELICT

Professor Djordje Djordjevi, PhD
Police Academy, Belgrade
Abstract: In November 2005, new Law of Delict was adopted, which brought important novelties in our delict-related legislation, both in its material and procedural
parts. To pass a new law of delict was necessary for many reasons, primarily because
of the need for additional adjustments following the discontinued use of Law on
Delict that used to break federal regulations, but also because of the adjustments
with the international regulations and newly-adopted regulations of criminal material and procedural legislation. Due to the necessity to adjust other delict regulations
with the new Law of Delict and the need to constitute new police courts, as well as to
make certain organizational and technical preparations, the application of the new
law was postponed for January 01, 2007.
The most important changes in material part of the new law refer to introduction of
the notion of delict and delict liability, as well as to the introduction of new penalties: work in public interest and penal points as punishment, forbidding the access
to the injured party, facilities or the place where the delict was made and public announcement of the sentences as protective measures, and so-called special measures
as correctional measures towards juveniles. As for the delict procedure, the most important novelties refer to institutions leading the procedure, especially introduction
of police courts as completely new institutions within our judicial system, but also
to the bigger role of public prosecutor, strengthening of the principle of initiation
of delict procedure, measures to ensure the presence of the accused, reaching the
verdict instead of decision on the delict, et cetera.

 , . XII, . 1, 75 96, 2006.

343.541 (497.15)

.
,
:
.


, ,
, . ,
,

, .

,
,
.
,
(.,
, ).

.
,
( 195),
,
,
, ,
: ,

.

[]

: , , ,
,

1.

,

, .

(
) ,


, ,
.1
,
,

.

,
.
, ,
,
,
. ,

,
,
.

.
.
1

[]

. . : ,
, . 910/86, . 69, 70; . : ,
, , 4/74, . 581.

2000. ,

,
, .

,
,
.
, , ,

. ,
,
.
,
(
), .
( 201)
,
,
. ,

,

.

,
,
.2


1. 2003. .

[]

2.

.
( 193),

.

, . ,
( ) ,
. ,
, ,
,


, .
,

.
,
.


( )
. , ,
. ,
,
,
, ,

.3 , .
3

,
192 , 18,7%
. . :
,
, , ,
1995. , . 204.

[]

1993. , ,
,
.

,
,
,
,
, .

4. ,
.
,

,
.
, .
( 93. )
( 89. ).
( 1, 193)


.4 , ,
, delicta communia.
, ,
. ,
(.,
,
).

.
,
, .

4

193, 1. , :

,
.

[]

.

, ,
,
,
.5 , ,
,
. ,
, ,
,
(. 147, 24. ).
() ().

,
.

, .
,
.6 , .,
,

,
.7
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
,

.

5
6
7

. : , , , 2003,
. 413.
. , . : , , 1999, . 192.
I 276/993, 30 2002. , www.vsrh.hr

[]

.8 , I 692/98.
,
,
.9 ,
,
.
,
, (.,
).

.
, , ,
.
, .
.10 ,

, ,
,
. ,
, .
, , .

, .


,
. ,
, ,
,
, .

8
9

. , . , op. cit., . 193.

. , . :
,
X , , 2/00, .
415.
10 . , 1981, . 315.

[]

,
.11

. ,
,
, , , ,
.,
, ., , , .
, ,



.
. .,


(.,
).
, ,
.
,
.
,
. ,
,
. ,
questio facti

.
, , .,
, , .,
, .,
( , , ),
, ,
, .) ,
,
11 I 753/013 11. 2003. , www.vsrh.hr

[]

. , .,

15
,
.12
, . ,
, ,

.
,
. .13 ,

,
,
,

,
.14 ,
,

.
a
,
,
. ,

.
,
,
.
12 I 276/993. 2002. , www.vsrh.hr
13 I 63/043 4. 3. 2004. , www.vsrh.hr
14
, , , ,
,
.
, . I 1006/88.
, , op. cit., . 424.

[]

,
, ,

,
,
,
, .15 ,

,
.

, ,
.

.
. . , , 3. 8.
,

.
,
,
,
. ,
,
,
,

. ,
, ,

,
, , .
, . .
,

. ,
15 , I 87/91 2. 10. 1991. . . , .
, op. cit., . 204.

[]

(
).
,
.


,
3. 8. ,


.16
, ,
,
,
, .
,
, , ,

.
,

, .

, immissio penis
in vaginam. , ,
(coniunctio membrorum), .
.17
, ,
in vaginam ,
, .18 ,
.
16 , , 49/04, . 24.
17 ,
. I
411/019 2002. , www.vsrh.hr
18 , , op. cit., . 194; , op. cit., . 316.

[]

.
,
,
,
,
.


(immissio in anus, immissio in os, fellacio)
,
(.,
in vaginam per anum).
,
,

, , ,
., ,
.19

, (.,
, .
, .).
,

lex certa,
.20
,
19 . , , op. cit., . 151, , , op. cit., . 195.
20 ,
,
,
( )
, . ,
nullum crimen
, ()

. , I 9517/1 10. 12. 1998.
. , . : , , , 2001, . 152.

[]

. ,

,

,
.
177, 2.
, ,

,
.

,
,
.21
,

.
,
,
.
.
( )
.22

(

), ,
.


, ,
,
. ,
21 H. Trondle, T. Fischer: Strafgesetzbuch und Nebengesetze, Munchen, C. H. Becksche: Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1999, 986987.
22 E. Foregger, E. E. Fabrizy: Strafgesetzbuch samt ausgewahlten Nebengesetze, Be, Manzsche Verlags
und Universitatsbuchhandlung, 1999, str. 582.

[]

,
, ,
, , .

,
.23

, .
, .

. ,
,

,
.
, . ,
, .
. ,
, ()
,

, ,
(vis haud ingrata),
,
.24 ,
,
,
, .25
,

. ,

.
23 , , op. cit., . 423.
24 I 276/993 30. 6. 2002, www.vsrh.hr
25 , op. cit., . 317.

[]

, ,
.
,
,
. 2, 193.
, : 1)
; 2)
; 3)
, 4)
,
.
. 3, 193.
. 1. 2.
.
.
4. ,
. ,26 2000.

( 89. ).

, .




.
,
.
;

, .,
,
.
,
,
26 4, 193. :

,
.

[]

.

, ,
.
, .,
, ., , ,
, .


.
3.

,
,
.
( 195),

.27
,
,
.

.28 , ,

.

( 193) (
194). 194,
,
27 192.
.
183. ,
, ,
.
28
2. 1990. ,
,
,
.

[]

,
.29 , . 1. 2.
, , , , ,
,
( 3),
.
,
,
,
,
, .

,
.

( 197).


. , ,

,
,
.30

, .
., ,
,
,
,
.
.31
, .

, ., .
29 . , , op. cit., . 198.
30 ,

( 194), .
31 , , op. cit., . 434.

[]

,
, ,
,
. :
( 198),
( 199)
( 200.),


( 251. 252) ( 96).
,
,

,
, . ,

,
.

.
,
,
,
, .
. 32 ,
. , ., 2.
,
,
,
. 3. ,
,
2,
,
,
. , ,
32 . , op. cit., . 419.

[]

,
. ( 4),
,

.
,
5. .

,
.
,
. ,
. , 199.
,
,
,
.

. 200.
,33
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
.
( 2)

( 3). ,
,

,

( 4).
33 34() 2. 1990. ,
() ,

.

[]

( 201.), ,
.

.34 2. , ,

.

,
. 3,

2.
.
.

( 194)
( 196).
.
,
, .
, ,

,
,
,
,
.
4.

,
.


34 , .
198.
.

[]

. ,

,
.
,
,

.
,
,

, .

, , ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
,
- ,
, ,
. ,


,


.

[]

CRIMES AGAINST SEXUAL INTEGRITY

IN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF REPUBLIKA SRPSKA
Assistant Professor Ivanka Markovi, PhD
Faculty of Law, Banja Luka
Abstract: The latest reforms of criminal legislation in Republika Srpska have brought
considerable changes in regulations regarding sexual-related crimes. The main characteristic of these changes is de-criminalization of all kinds of behavior in the sphere
of human sexuality which is consensual and which is carried out between adults, on
the one hand, and strengthening of criminal and legal protection of sexual integrity
of children and minors, on the other hand. In addition to this, new concept of rape
has been accepted, according to which rape is qualified as any case when sexual intercourse or other sexual activity that can be made equal with sexual intercourse by
its effects, is carried out against the will (without consent) of a passive subject. The
earlier sexual and marital discrimination based on the rule that only a man can be
perpetrator and that only a woman with whom the perpetrator does not share marital community can be passive subject, has been abandoned, and sexual blackmail
has been introduced as a special form of rape. All this points to the conclusion that
criminal zone of rape is widened considerably, which led to abolishing of certain
incrimination absorbed by this crime (for instance, unnatural debauchery, forced
sexual intercourse).
Tendency to widen and strengthen criminal and legal protection of sexual integrity
of children and minors has been realized by an increased number of incriminations.
The author particularly points out to that effect the crime of sexual violence of a child
(Art. 195), as quite a new incrimination which provides for optimum protection of
a childs sexual integrity, then to satisfying ones sexual passion in front of another
person, as well as certain crimes that do not represent completely new legal solutions
but still bring certain novelties in our legislation such as: trafficking in humans for
the purpose of prostitution, abuse of children and minors for pornographic purposes and production and publication of child pornography.

[]

 , . XII, . 1, 97 108, 2006..

623.4.015.4

.
,
:
.
.
, ,
. , , ()
, .
: , , , .

.

( 3000.3),
. ,
:
, ,
.1 , .
1

-: Legal Issues Concerning Military Use of NonLethal

Weapons, http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/ issues//sautenet72_text.htm, 13.05.2002, .4.

[]

.
. .
: ,
.
.
,
, . , ,
.
.
, ,
.

.
,
: . ,
, .2
,
( ),
.

, 1996. ,
.
:
(), ( ),

.3

, :
2
3

Ibid, . 5.
: , , , . 34/96, , , 1996,
. 115.

[]

(SIPRI , 1993.
).4 ,
: ,
, , ,
5 (ARDEC - Arnament Research, Development and Engineering Center ,
6).7 ,

:

.8

. ,
,
.
, ,
. , .
, ,
,
. ,
. ,
.
,
. ,
, . :
?
.

, . ,
4
5
6
7
8

Ibid.
Ibid.
,
. : ,
.
.: , , , . 34/96, , B, 1996,
. 115.
Ibid, . 115.

[]

,
.
.
,
.

, .

.
: (1)
( ) (2)
( ).
, ,
.
, :

? , ,
. ,
, ,
,
.
,
.
. , .
, ,
, .
. , , ,
. ,
.

: ,
- .9 ,
9

Lewer N.: NonLethal Weapons Research Project, , http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/nlw/

cendera1.html, 5. 13. 2002.

[]

. ,
. ,
, ,
. ,

.

- .
,
, . ,
. ,
.

.10 , , ,
.11
,

: , , ,
, .
,
.
. ,
,
.
,
,
( ).
.
,
10 : :
, , , . 1/94, , , 1994, . 1825.
11 Joint Concept of Non Lethal Weapons, Department of the Navy, Washington D. C, 1998, . 8.

[]

. , ,
. ,

, .
, , ,

,
.
,

. ,
,
. ,
, ,
,
, , .
,
,
: ?. ,
,
.
. ,
, ,
, ,
,
.
, . ,
, .
, , , .
, .
, ,
.
, . , : (1)
[]

, (2) .
, : ?

, .
, , ,

. ,

.

, ,
.
,
.

.
, ,
. , ,
, ,
. , , .
, , . , ,
, .
,
,
, .
. . -,
, ,
,

.

[]

.12 ,

, .
, ,
.

.
13
( ),
. ,
, .

,
.
,
. ,
.
,

.

.
,
. ,
,

. ,

.

, -,
(.
).
12 : . .: , , , 1998.
13 , .
, .

[]

,
. ,
3000.3,
:
,
.14 ,
.15
,
. ,
,


. , .

.16

.17
: ,
. .

.
.

, ,
.18 ,
( ).
14 Department of Defence Directive 3000.3, Department of Defence, Washington D.C., 1996, .3.
15 :
. : Thomas R.M.: Non lethal weaponry: A framework for future integration, Air command and staff college, Air university, Maxwel air force base, Alabama, 1998,
. 23.
16 : National Institute of Justice Initiative on Less Than Lethal Weapons, National Institute of Justice Research in Brief, Washington D.C., 1993.
17 Thomas R.M.: Nonlethal weaponry: A framework for future integration, Air command and staff
college, Air university, Maxwel air force base, Alabama, 1998, . 24.
18 , :
, , , ,
.

[]

.
: ,
, , ( ),
.


. ,

, ,
,
. ,
.
, ,
.
, .
, ,
. , ,
,
.

,
.

,
. ,
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
,

.

[]

, ,

. ,
: (1)
(2)

. , ,

,
.
,
. ,
.
, ,
. ,
, .
, ,
. .
:
?
:

(SIPRI , 1993. ).19 . ,
, .
, , , . , ,
.

19 .

[]

1.

. (1996). , . , . 3-4/96,
: .
2. (1996). Department of Defence Directive 3000.3. Washington D.C:
Department of Defence.
3. (1998). Joint Concept of Non Lethal Weapons. Washington D.C: Department
of the Navy.
4. (2002). Legal Issues Concerning Military Use of Non Lethal Weapons. http://
www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/ issues//sautenet72_text.htm, 13.05.2002.
5. Lewer N. (2002). Non Lethal Weapons Research Project. , http://
www.brad.ac.uk/acad/nlw/ cendera1.html, 5. 13. 2002.
6. (1993). National Institute of Justice Initiative on Less Than Lethal Weapons.
Washington D.C: National Institute of Justice Research in Brief.
7. . (1994).
. , , . 1/94, : .
8. . (2004).
.
, : .
9. . . (1998). . : .
10. Thomas R.M. (1998). Non lethal weaponry: A framework for future
integration. Alabama: Air Command and Staff College, Air University,
Maxwel Air Force Base.

NOTION OF NON-LETHAL WEAPONS

Assistant Professor Dane Suboi, PhD
Police Academy, Belgrade
Abstract: The paper undoubtedly determines the content of the notion non-lethal
weapons. It starts from determining the validity of the existing definitions of nonlethal weapons in comparison with the requirements for a valid definition. After that,
basic features of non-lethal weapons are determined, in order to come to the core of
the subject of definition. Finally, the new valid definition of non-lethal weapons as
specific means of coercion is deducted.
[]

 , . XII, . 1, 109 130, 2006.

343.431
343.9.02

,
:
. , , , .
.
: , , .

() ,
,
, ,
,
,
.1

(
, ,
, )

[]

( ,
), (
, ,
.).2

,
.
,
,
.


,

, .

.
1.

,
, ,

2000. : , , , ,
, , , ,


, . ,
, , , , ;

(); , , ,


() ; 18 .3
[]

, .4
( 388 ) ,
, ,
, ,
,
, , , , , , ,
, ,
, ,
, , , ,
.
,
,
.
.
.
,
.
( 389 )

,
, ,
, ,
.

, .
.
, , . ,
,
.
, . , ,
, .

[]

,
.
,
.
.
,

.5
2.

.
2.1.

-
,
, ,
.6
(, )
. ,
,
.7
8 ,
.
, ,
. :
-,
.

.

, , ;9
, ,
:
[]

.
: ,

, (.,
)10; ,
.
(
), 11,
,
,
,
. ,
( ,
.)12,
, , , ,
. :
, ,
(.,
); ,

, 13,
,

,
. .
,
.
,
.
()
14. ,
.
( ),

[]

( )
() .
( ),
,
( ).
,
, .
, , ,
(., 14, 16, 18, 21 .).
;
;
,
; , ,

. ,

15. ,
: .

, ,
.
,
, . .

, .

.


.16
,
.

[]

2.2. modus operandi

. ,
, , .17
2.2.1.

,
.

, , , ,
:18
,

, .

, .


;

.
: ,
,
.
,
.
.

(., , ,
,
),
,
,
.

[]

,

.


, , , .
,
, .

(traffickers). , , ,
, . 19,
(recruiters), (transporters), (controlers),
/ ,

,
.
20 ,
21
. , ,
22 ( , ,
, , .)
.

.
,
.
. .
, ,
.23
. ,

.
[]

.
() , ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
( ), ,
, ( ,
), , ,
, ,
, ,
,
, .

: ( ,
, , .); ;
o ;
; ;
; ,
:
, (
, , ,
, .
).

, ,
( )
.
(IOM)
M, 63%
, 12% ,
.24
2.2.2.

,
.
.

[]

(

) ,


.

.
, .

,
.

,
.
( ,
, , ,

) ( ,
).

, .
,
( .
) () .
2.2.3.

,
, ,
, .
.
,
.
25, :
, (
, )
[]

( ,
, );
, , , ;
, ,
,
;
,
.
;
, , , ,

;
, ,
.;
,
, ,
;
, ()
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
.

,
:
,
() ;
; ;
; ; ;
;
,
; ;
,
.

[]

2.2.4.

,
.
: ,
, ,

, , ,
.
2.3.

.

.

,
.26
, . .
, ,
, .
, , ,
:
(IOM) , , 15 30
. , 700 2 , , . 200
300 (
-)
. 500
27.
2001. 700 4 , , 28. 2005. .
[]

6 , ,
CIA, 27
.29
T
7 13 , 7
.
,
60 30. 400%
,
.31

:
( )

6 .32 .33
1 000 2 000 ,
3 000 . ,
, , , : , ,
, , ,
;
, 15 50 ;
2 500 ,
; 50 ,
500 , 100 .34 : ., ,
,
22:00 4:00 . , 7:00 .
: 30 , 200 , 800 . , 20%
. , .35
100
, 75 , 150 , 75 ,

[]

150 , 999 , 530 , 550 ,

450 649 .
750
. 5 000 .36
, .37
:
10%
, 20%
.38

.

.

:
,

39.

,

, .
. . ,
:
, . ( )
.
, , .
.
. Eldorado
, , , : ,
; ;
.40
[]

,
,
, .

, , - ,
.

.
.
, .
. ,
, .
,
, .
, ,
, , .

.

,
,
.

() , ,
, ,
,
.

[]

( ,
, , )
( ,
), (
, ,
.). ,
,
, .
. .
,
,
. ,
,
, -
,
.

.
, .
.
,
, .
,
, .
,
,
,
, .
.

,
,
.
[]

3
4

, .: ,
, 23/2004, , ,
2005, . 172192.
, .: , International Council of
Voluntary Agencies/Centre for International Support, International
Organization for Migration
, , 2004, . 6.
3 , , 6
27. 2001. .
, 111
,
, , 39/2003.
, , 85/2005,
,
.
, .:
, , 1,
, , 2005, . 5166.
,

(., ),
.
,
,
.

, ,
,
.

. ,
.
,
, .
.
. (55)
2003. . . ,
, .

[]

10

11

12

13

14
15

[]

. ,
8. 2003.

,
.
10 30
. ,
17. 2003.
,
.
:

.
Trafficking in Human Beigns in Southeastern Europe Current Situation and
Responses to Trafficking in Human Beigns in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Bulgaria, Croatia, The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, The Former Yougoslav
Republic of Macedonia, Moldova, Romania, UNICEF UNOHCHR OSCE
ODIHR, 2002, p. 7. ,
, .
, ,
,
200 . 2002.
60 .
,
11. 2002.
, ,
(28- )

, . ,
50
. 350 .
350 000 , 13. 2003.
Trafficking in Human Beigns: Implications for the OSCE, OSCE ODIHR
Background Paper, Warshaw, 1999, p. 21
,
.
, .
.
.

.

16

17

18

19

20

21

, (.,
). ,
,
, .
,
,
,
.
,
.

,
. , , .:
, , , 2005, . 158242.
( ), ( 14
2003),
(

), , 2003, . 3334.
2, Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights
and Human Trafficking, United Nations High Commisissioner for Human
Rights to the Economic and Social Council, E/2002/68/Add.1, New York,
2002.
(
. .) sex trafficking 2002.

. , 8.
2002; 40
25
.

. , 28.
2004.
, IPTF

(, , ,
), UNMIK KFOR
.
Trafficking in Human Beigns in Southeastern Europe Current Situation and
Responses to Trafficking in Human Beigns in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina,

[]

22

23

24
25

26

27

28

29

[]

Bulgaria, Croatia, The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, The Former Yougoslav

Republic of Macedonia, Moldova, Romania, p. 68, 96.
,
,
, ,
. Europol, Annual report 2002, Europol, Luxembourg, 2003, p. 23.
Na, I.: Krijumarenje osoba, Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu,
Vol. 5, br 2, Hrvatsko udruenje za kaznene znanosti i praksu, Zagreb,
1998, . 578579.
, .; , .: , Beosupport,
, 2003, . 9, 13.
, , .: ,
, , , 1,
, , 2005, . 3342.
.

( , , , , ,
.). .
, ,
(, ,
, ). , .
,
,
,
,
( ,
.). , .:
: ,
, 34, ,
, 2003, . 143.
Schatzer, P.: World Migration Report 2000, Co-published by International
Organization for Migration and United Nations.
, .:
( ), IOM, , 2001, . 2.

,
05. 06. 2002. (
: www. usofficepristina.usia.co.at/serbs/sdoc.3.htm
9. 2003).
, .: ,
,

30

31
32
33

34

35
36
37

38
39
40

, , 2004, .
290, 295.
Leclair, G.: Europol / X Congrs des Nations Unies pour la prvention du
crime et le traitement des dlinquants, Vienne, avril 2000.
Dusch, S.: Le trafic d tres humains, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris,
2002. . 109.
Global Programme Against Trafficking in Human Beigns, United Nations
Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, New York, 1998.
Zalisko, W.: Russian organized crime: The foundation for trafficking, Police,
Bobit Publishing Company, Redondo Beach, 2000, p. 19.
Pollmann, M. U.: Trafficking in Unaccompanied Minors Germany,
Trafficking in Unaccompanied Minors in the European Union, IOMIHESI
(BrusselsParis), 2002, p. 42.
, .; , .: , . 10.; ,

, 3. 2002.

, 17. 2004.
, .: ,
, , 2003, . 32, 38.
, .:
, , 34,
, , 2003, . 309.
, .: ,
, , 2002, .157.
Maizhevich, H.: Trafficking in Women in EU Policy, 2001, p. 19.
Limes, Rivsta Italiana di Geopolitica, Rim, No 1/1999, p. 69.
, .: ,
, , 2002, . 5556.

[]

HUMAN TRAFFICKING AS A FORM OF ORGANIZED CRIME MAIN

PHENOMENOLOGIAL FEATURES
Sasa Mijalkovi, PhD
Police Academy, Belgrade
Abstract: Human trafficking is a complex socio-pathological phenomenon based on
(historical) institutions of slavery and exploitation, i.e. on treating a man as goods or a
thing, in order to exploit his labor power, knowledge and skills, bodily and sexual integrity in order to satisfy ones own or someone elses instinct, health or emotional needs or
in order to gain direct or indirect material profit for oneself or somebody else.
Certain forms of slavery and exploitation of persons known from ancient times can
be seen today in identical form (public selling of victims, working exploitation in
agricultural and home sector, sexual exploitation, forced participation in armed
conflicts) or in modified forms (working exploitation in industrial sector, illegal
adoption), and there are completely new forms (trafficking in human bodily organs
or parts, performing medical experiments, forced pregnancy, and similar). On the
other hand, manifesting forms of human trafficking do not differ in practice from
some other similar phenomena, primarily smuggling of migrants, prostitution and
work of illegal migrants in so-called black economy sector. This is why it has been
pointed to the main features of this phenomenon.
The conclusion is that human trafficking is a multi-manifesting phenomenon, and
this is why it is very difficult to come to a comprehensive, generally accepted classification of its manifesting forms. The offered classification of forms of human trafficking according to the degree of social danger, geographical level of implementation,
physical and biological characteristics of victims and relation of victim to his/her
position, in principle, does not exclude the possibility of some other classification.
The cases of human trafficking in practice can almost always be identified as some of
possible combination of previously mentioned forms and types.
In addition to being a multi-manifesting, human trafficking is also a multi-structural
phenomenon. The process of its realization, in principle, consists of four stages with
many sub-stages within each of them. The dominant moments in realization of human trafficking are certainly recruiting of victims, their transport, exploitation and
elimination.
Finally, human trafficking is exceptionally developed and represented activity of
organized criminal groups, more and more often transnational in scope. Excessive
demand for sexual services increased the excessive demand for the victims of trafficking, but also the division of jobs among criminal organizations, their specialization and tendency to create monopole position at human market, which is more
and more characterized by marketing, work of agencies, rules of business operations
and other epithets of modern economic management. There are huge possibilities of
profit since the victims can be exploited in many various ways.
The knowledge of the main characteristics of certain forms of human trafficking is an
important condition to identify these complex and dynamic phenomena in practice,
then to distinguish the human trafficking from other similar security problems as
well as to identify active and passive subjects in human trafficking.
[]

 , . XII, . 1, 131 147, 2006.

327.84

,
: , , .
,
.
: , , , .

1.

. ,

.1

,
,
.

.

.
1

, .: , , 1999, . 17.

[]

, , ,
, ,
,

. 2
,
,
,
,
, ,
, ,
( ),
.3
,
, , .,
, , .

.
,
. ,
:
, ,
.4

, , , . . ,

,
.
,

2
3
4

, .: , , 1982, . 27.
, .: , , 2002, . 41.
Gonella, R.: Role of EUROPOL in the fight against Organised Crime, in: The contribution of Data
Exchange Systems to the Fight Against Organised Crime in the SEE Countries: n Assessment, str. 358.

[]

.
,
.
,

.
:

, , .

,
.

,

- .
.
,

.
. ,
,

,
.

.
,
.

,
,
. , ,

[]

.
,

,
, , ,
, , , .,
,
, .
,
,
.
,
,

,
- . ,
,
.
2.

2.1.

.
,
, ,
, , .

.5
2.2.

,

5

, .: , , 2005, . 17.

[]

.6
,
.


().
.
, ,
.
3.

,

.7
. ,
(
):
1.
:

- .
2.
:
, ;
, .;
;
;
;
- ;
;
;
;
6
7

.: op. cit., , 1999, . 17.

. ( ), , . 1988.

[]

;
;
;
,
.
:
,
;

,
.
4.

4.1.

.
.
(,
) .

,
. ,

,
. , ,

.8

, .: , ,
2005, . 21.

[]

4.2.

,

() .9 ,

,
. ,
(),
,
. ,
,
.
5.

,10 :
.
, .

.
.
.
. ,
,
. ,
, , ,
.


,
.
9 , .: , , 1993, . 53.
10 Gonella, R.: Role of EUROPOL in the fight against Organised Crime, The contribution of Data Exchange Systems to the Fight Against Organised Crime in the SEE Countries: en Assessment.

[]

.
,
.
.
,

, , .
.
,
,
.
, .
.


, ,
.
6.

:
. , ,

.
.


.
,
,
.11
11

, .: - , , 1895, . 21.

[]

. ,

.
.

.
, feed back,
,
.
7.

.


.

.

.
, ,
, ,
. ,
. ,

, . ,
.
8.

,
,
,
.
, , ,

[]

.12
, , ,
,
. , ,
. ,
.

,
.

, ,
.
9.

.
: , ,
.
, , ,
.

, .
9.1.

( )
,
, . ,
, .
,
12

, .: op. cit., , . 185.

[]

.
,

.
9.2.

.
.

.
,
.

,
.
:
1.
2. .
,
( ) ,
.
.

.
,
,
, .
,
.

.
.
, , .
:
( ), , ,

[]

( ).13
9.3.

. , .
,
.
9.4.

. ,
, ,
, . . ,
,
,
.
,
.
9.5.

.
.

.

,
.


. . ,
13

, .: ,
XIX , , 2004, . 1.

[]

,
, .
9.6.

.
.
, . ,

,
.
, , .
9.7.

.
,

.
9.8.

,
. , ,
feed back .

, ,
.

.
,
. , ,


,
.

[]

,
.
10.

,
.
.
.
.
.

.
, ,
,
. ,

.
.
.


.
. ,
.

,
.
,
,
, , () ,
, , ,
.14
14

, .: op. cit., , 2002, . 44.

[]

,
.
, , - ,
, .
, ,

.
,
, ,
.
,

.
,

.


.

[]

1. , .: ( ),
, 1993.
2. , .: - , ,
1895.
3. , .: , , 2005.
4. Gonella, R.: Role of EUROPOL in the fight against Organised Crime, The
contribution of Data Exchange Systems to the Fight Against Organised Crime
in the SEE Countries: en Assessment.
5. , .:
, , 2005.
6. , .: , , 1982.
7. , .: ,
XIX
, , 2004.
8. , .: , , 2002.
9. , .:
, , 2005.
10. , .: , , 1999.

INTELLIGENCE CYCLE
Marina Mali Sazdovska, M.A.

Police Academy, Skopje

Abstract: This text offers a review of intelligence cycle, i.e. a review of a procedure of
gathering, analysis and use of intelligence information. It is necessary that all operatives
involved in intelligence and broader in other police agencies who also work on gathering of security interesting data and knowledge be acquainted with this knowledge.
[]

 , . XII, 1, 149 166, 2006.

322.26/.27

.
,

:
,
.

, , -
.
,
, . -
, ,
.

, .
: , , , , , .

1.

-
(),
. ,

[]

()
.

.

(CIA)
-

.
, , , , ,
()
.

(, ).
,
()
.1

.
,
,

.
, ()

,
() .
, ()
.
()
.
. ,
1

: Guide to the Analysis of Insurgency, Central Intelligence Agency (n. d., p. 2), 1980.

[]

.
, , ,
.
, , ,
() .

,
. ,

. ,

. ,
, (),
.

. , , -,
, (covert) .
, .
, a
,
.
, , ,
.
,
.
,
,
(covert)
.

(
), ( , .
..) .

.

[]

,
.
,
.
.


.
, . .
,
.

.

, ,
, . ,
.
. ,
.
,
,
, .
, ,
.
,

(, , . . .) .
,
,
, ,
( ) , ., -
.
, (
), , ,
.
(, , . . .)
.
.
[]

.
.

( )
.
.
,
. ,

.

, , ,
, , , ,

.
.
,

, , ,
( , ).

,
.
,
,
.
,
,

. , ( )
:
I :


(, . . .) s
.
.

[]

II :

.
.
.
III :

,
.


.
( , .
. .) ,
. , ,
- :
1.
.
, ()
,
(, , . . .).
,
.
. ,

, ,
( 30-
).
2. ( )
.
, .

, ,
. 1917. .
.
3. , ,
.
[]

,
, .
,
. ,
.

,
.
.
4. , ,
.
.
, .
. ,
,
. ,
, ,
. ,
.
.
-
.
,
.
2.

2
.
, ,
,
() .

,
2

-
, ,
, .

[]

. ,
:
1. ,
2. (
).

,
,
,
.

, , , .
, ,

, , , , .


.
,
:
;

;
( );
.
, ,
.



, : ,
(
).


(
[]

), ,
.

,

.

(
),

.
,
,
.
,
,

.
,
.
3.

.
,
, .
, , ,
()

. ( ) ,
.
, ,
.

, ,

[]

,
.
,
, ,
.
,
,
.
, , ,
,

.
XX


, .

() ,
,

.
,
.


,
.

.
,
- .
,

. ,
,
( ) -,
.
[]

,
( ) .
19501960. ,
,
, ,
.

, ,
.
( )

.
,
( ) ,
-, . ,
-
.
1949.

.


.

.
( )

(

),
,
,
. ,

,

. , ,

[]

,
, ,
.3

, , , , ,
( ) .


, ,
.
,
.

.
,
, .
,

,
.
, ,
,

.

,
.
(
) .
,
, ,
, , , , 3

: , , ,
, , 1993.

[]

.

.
.
,
,
.
.
, - (
),
.


- .
,
(
1961.
) -.

-
().
.

(guerre rvolutionnaire).
XX
.
(, )

. , ,
(),
-

.
,
,
, ,
. ,

[]

.

.
(flexible response)
(New frontier)

, . ,
,
,
.


. ,


.

,
.4


(),
- : ...
,

, ,
...5
,
, -
.
, .
( )
4
5

: , , , . 50.
, . 7.

[]

.
, ,
.

.
-

, .
( ),
-
.

()
( )
.
.

,
.
, ,
( )
, ,

.

() , .
, ,
, .
.

[]

4.

()

:
.
,

.
,
, ,


, .

,
.
()
.

.

- , ,

, .
,
.
, ,
,

, ,
( ,
) .
[]

.
,
.

,
.
.



.
, ,
, .
,
. ,
,
,
,
.
,
, ,

, .
,
.

.

[]

ARMED UPRISINGS
Professor Mitko Kotovevski PhD
Faculty of Philosophy, Skoplje
The Institute for Defense and Peace Studies
Abstract: Following the end of the Cold War, uprisings experience their renaissance
and transformation getting enraged all over the world, especially in chronic centers
of crises and zones of tension. Armed uprisings have changed their ideological matrix and religious pattern begins to dominate their manifestation, or to be more precise, their leaning on religious and fundamentalist groups that are deeply connected
with nationalist political platform is characteristic. The new trend is confirmed also
by characteristic symbiosis between religion and ethnic separatism characteristic for
the Balkans, Caucasus, Punjab and Cashmere. Within the new military-political and
security environment, they become increasingly intertwined, connected and merged
with terrorism, organized crime and other forms of violence. During the post-communist period, many uprisings were predominantly religious in character or were
more pronouncedly connected with illegal trade or crimes than the previous, primarily political and revolutionary-oriented uprisings.

[]

 , . XII, . 1, 167 187, 2006.

UDK 339.13:[339.923:061.1UE

- ,
:

.
:
1) , 2) ,
3) .
,


. , ,
- XX ,
.
: , , ,
.

1.

1.1.

K ( concurrentia) , . ,

[]

1 XVIII
XIX , 1890. .2

,
,

.
.
,
,
, , . ,
, , , .
,

(,
.).3

,
, ,
70- 80- XX ,
.
,
,
.

, ,
1

2
3

, ;
(, ) .
. ,
. , .
, , , , , 1980.

.
, ,
,
. , . 1, , , 1985.
Steiner, Textbook on EEC Law, , 1992.
, , , 1975.

[]

a
.
.



. ,
.


, ,
.
1.2. 4

. 85 865 ,
.
86
,

, .
. 85 86
, . ,
, . 87 89,
. :
. 85 86 ;
85,
;
. 85 86 ;
6 7 ,
4
5
6
7

.
1993. , 1999. 2000. ; ,
, , 2003.
,
, ,
.
. (25),

.

[]

, .


.
,
.
,
,
177 ,8 , 173
, . ,


,
. ,
172 , 17,
.
,
.
85,
.
1.3.

.
,
,
.
,

. , ,
.
8

, , , 2003.

[]

,

,
. ,
. 9
, ,
, ,
, .
, ,
,
.10
(Wdpolp)
1988. . ,

,
.
, ,
, , ,

.
85
.
,

,
. , ,


,
, ,
9

Wdpolp


, .
10 . , , , 1995.

[]

.


. ,
,

.
2.

,

, , ,
(
).

.
. ,11

.

,

.
. ,
,
,
.
,

,
, , ,
.
11 3 (f)
.

[]

2.1.

)
)
).
)
)
.
: ,
, , ,
, ....
, ,
,
.12

50%, ,
, , ,
10% . ,
20% 40%,
.
,
,
.
,

: ,
, ,

.
)


12 , , ,
, , 2003.

[]

,

.
,
.
:
;
;
;
;
,
.
(General Mottors)
,
,
.
(Continental Can)
.

.
)

.
,
:
;
,
.

.
,
.
,
.

[]

, ,
, ,

.
)
,
,
.
,
argumentum a contrario. ,

.
,
.
2.2.
13

,

.

14.

:
I .
II :
)
,
;
) ;
13 , ,
y , , 2004.
14 ,
, 137, , 2001.

[]

)
;
) .
III .
I
(), 82 ,
.

.
,

.
. ,
,
.

,
. , ,
.

, ,
.

(
). ,

.
(United Brandts)

.

,
.
.
,
.
[]

.
II
(c) 82 , ,
. je
,
.
,

.
a)
(United Brandts),

.
: ,

() 70- XX .

(),
.
.
,
.
,
.
. , ,
, , :
, , , ,
.

. ,
.

.

[]

. ,
,
.
.


, ad ho
,
,

. . .

(
).

,


,
.

.


.

- (HoffmanLa Roche).

:
o e a
s - ;
;
;
,
[]

,
.
. .

, ,
. ,

:
;
,
.
-

.


.

, .

(
).

,

.
,
.

,
,
,
. ,
, ,

.

[]

,
.
)

,
,
.
,

(Commercial Solvents),

.

, .
Advokate General (
)


,

.
,


.
.
)

.

: ...


.
[]

,
, ,
,
,

. ,
,
.
Mogil 1995. .


.



.
.

.

. .
, , ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
.


,

.
)

81 .
82 ,
, 81
,
,

[]

.
,
81 .
,


.
, ,
. ,
15

( 3 )
. ,

.
III
(c) 82 ,
, (d)

,
, .
, (d)
( )
.
(d):
.


,
.

15 . ,
, , , 1996.

[]

3.

, ,

, ,
, ,
.16

,

.


, :
;
;
;
;
;
;
,

.
,

.

:

;
, ;
;
16 , ,
, 137, , , 2001.

[]

;
;
;
;

;
,

, .
, . :
,
, , ,
,
, , ,

.

,
.
, ,
, .
, , ,
,
,
.
,
,

, ,
.

.

[]

.
, ,
.

, ,
.

, .
,
, . ,
.

,
.
, ,
. ,
.

, . , ,
,
,
.
, , .

, .
, .
,
,
.

[]

1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

8.
9.

10.
11.
12.
13.

[]

,
, 137,
, 2001.
. , , 1995.
, , , ,
, 2, 2001.
, , 1, 2004.
: www.eurolex.com
, , 2003.
,
, y , ,
2004.
, ,
, , 2003.
,
17 , , ,
, , 2005.
. ,
, , , 1996.
, . 1, , , 1985.
, , , 975.
, , , ,
1980.

NOTION AND FORMS OF ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION IN

MARKETORIENTED BUSINESS PRACTICE OF THE EU
Vlajko Djuri
Security Information Agency, Belagrade
Abstract: The policy of competition represents one of the most important segments
of the activities of the EU bodies on the establishing and preservation of a unique
internal market. It represents a necessary addition to measures the goal of which
is to achieve basic principles on which functioning of a unique market is based: 1)
free movement of goods and services; 2) free movement of people labor power; 3)
free movement of capital. While the stated measures aim at removing various state
obstacles to free trade among the member states, the measures within the policy of
competition should remove the limitations to functioning of market mechanism of
the EU, which originates from the very participants of the market game. The competition policy as such, since the origination of the idea of the EU until its formal legal
foundation in 20th century, makes a continuous part of communitarian law.

[]

 , . XII, . 1, 189 208, 2006.

327.51

a,
: -
.

, . ,
-,
.
: , ,
, -
, .

, ,
,
11. . ,
, ,
. (Walter Laquerer)
.1
1

Charles W. Kegley, Jr, The Carasteristics, Causes and Controls of the New Global Terrorism: An Introduction, in: Charles W. Kegley, Jr. (ed.), The New Global Terrorism, Pearson Education, New Yersey, 2003, p. 1.

[]

?
,
2 , ,
-. .

.3
, ,
, .
. ,
,
.
, ,
,
.4
, e
, 2001. ,
2003. ( -
),
- (US National Strategy for Combating Terrorism).5
,
hostes humani generis.
4D: defeat (), deny (), diminish () defend
(). 2003.
, .
, ,
,
.6
2
3
4
5
6

+ +State Department
.
Richard Falk, The Great Terror War, Olive Branch Press, New York, 2003, p. 48.
Robert Kagan, Of Paradise and Power (America and Europe in the New World Order), Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2003, p. 4.
Freedom and fear are at war, National Stratedy for Combating Terrorism.
Dr Sven Biscop, The Europen Security Strategy, Implementing a Distinctive Approach to Security,
Royal Institute for International Relations, Internet, 02/03/06, http://www.ir-ri-kiib.be.

[]

,

.
5 ,
.7
.
,
.
8
og a (first-strike)

.9
- 1999. ,
, (
Combined Joint
Task Forces CJTF) , , ,
- .
,
.
11. 2001. . ,
,
(Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council EAPC).10
-,

.
,
.

, 5, : . , , , 2002, . 208.
8 Wittkopf R. Eugene, Kegley W. Charles, World Politics (Trend & Transformation), Ninth edition,
Thomson & Wadsworth, Belmont, 2004, p. 538.
9 ,
.
10 (26) (20),
.

[]

10. 11.
1994. .
( 1997. )
(
) ,
- . ,
-
,
.
, , .
,
-. , ,
.11
,

,
. :

,
,
,
, /
-,

, ,
-
, ,
,

.12
11 ,
, Internet, 11/09/05, http://www.managment.org.yu/ pdf/uslovi_
i_ obaveze.part.pdf.
12 , 10-11. , . , .
(), , ,
, 2001, . 102-103.

[]

, ,
.
, - . ,
-.
, -,
. .

, ,
.

(PARP Planning and Reivew Process).

-
, .
, - , ,
.

.
- /
-.
, .
-, ()
.
,
.
-
, , ,
, .
,
(
1999. , 2004. ).

[]

-
. ,

. -,
,
. -
, ,

.
- ,

, . 12. 2001. ,
-, , ,
. -,

, , , , 21. 2002. , (Partnership
Action Plan Against Terrorism PAP-T).13


.
, 1373
. , EAPC
,

, ,
.
, ,
13 Partnership Action Plan Against Terrorism. The Prague Summit and NATOs Transformation,
NATO Public Diplomacy Division, Brussels, 2003, p. 8793.

[]

,
.


.14

. :
; ; ;
;
;
; ; ;
;
.
, ,
,
, .
:
-
, , ,



,

,
, - ,

,
,
,
,
.15

,
14 Ibid, p. 87.
15 Ibid, p. 88.

[]

. , ,
-
,
.

.

. ,16

, .
:
(
, , ,
);
(
,
,
,
, ,
);
(
, ,
);

(
,
,
,

);

( - Clearing House
,
16 , , .
, , 10% .

[]

).17
, -
. , , .
.

, .
, ,
. -
, ,

. ,
,
,
-.18

-.
.
, ,
. ,
. ,
, , ,
, ,
- -.
, .
-, , .
. , 2017 Partnership Action Plan Against Terrorism, . 8992.
18 Cristopher Bennett, :
, : (.),
, , , 2004, . 35.

[]

-25% -. ,
-. ,
,
.19 ,

.
, ,

.
. -,
2-5% , 500
.20
, ,
,
-.
. ,
. 11. ,
.
,
.21 ,
-
(NATO-Russia Action Plan on Terrorism).
- .
,
,
. ,
- , , .

19 Gabe Mynten and Sandra Walklate, Criminology and Terrorism, British Journal of Criminology, 28.
July, 2005, p. 15.
20 : Jean-Mark Sorel, Some Questions About Definitions of Terrorism and the Fight
Against Its Financing, EJIL (2003), VOL. 14, No. 2, p. 365378.
21 , , , , 2003, . 297-302.

[]

,
.
,
,
, .

- (Partnership for Peace Status of Forces Agreement PfP SOFA). ,
,
.22

,


. , 11. ,

.


,
.23
, . , .
,
, .24
,
22 NATO-Russia Action Plan on Terrorism, Internet, 06/03/06, http://www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/
b041209a-e.htm.
23 , , , :
(.), ,
, , , .
262263.
24 Prague Summit 2002 NATO in the 21st Century, NATO Public Diplomacy Division, Brussels, 2002,
p. 10.

[]

.

-
,
. -
.
. ,
. ,
2004. .

. ,
-,
(Intelligence Liaison Unit ILU)
.


(Terrorist Threat Intelligence Unit TTIU),

.
,
,
.

, ,
. ,
, . -
2004.
,

2005. .
, (EuroAtlantic Disaster Response Coordination Centre EADRCC)
, .

.
[]

(South East European Security Cooperation Steering Group SEEGROUP).
,
.25

. 2002
2004
- -
.
,
.
,
2003. .
. 17.
2006. , , .26
, -
. , , .
,
, ,

.
, ,
.


( , , );
-; ;

25 Report on the Partnership Action Plan against terrorism, Internet, 09/03/06, http://www.nato.int/
docu/ basictxt/b040623be.htm.
26 NATO and Russia tackle terror at sea, Internet, 07/03/06, http://www.nato.int/docu/update/2006/02february/e0217b.htm.

[]

. , , ,
.27
-
- ,


. , -
,

.

-
. ,

, .
,

. ,
5
, .
-,
-,
.
,
.
,
.28


.
27 Security Trough Partnership, NATO Public Diplomacy Division Distribution Unit, Brussels, 2005,
p. 33.
28 Fergus Carr, Kostas Ifantis, NATO in the New Europen Order, Macmillan Press, St. Martins Press,
London New York, 1996, p. 1518.

[]

, ,
- (rogue states) ,
.29
,
.

.
,
.
.30
,
,
,
,

. , ,

.
,
, ,


. ,
-,
. ,
.
, ,
, 31

.

.
29 Security Trough Partnership, . 36.
30 Brian M. Jenkins, International Terrorism, in: Robert J. Art, Kenneth N. Waltz (eds.), The Use of
Force Military Power and International Politics, Sixth Edition, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc,
New York, 2004, p. 83.
31 Paul R. Pillar, Dealing with Terrorists, in: Robert J. Art, Kenneth N. Waltz (eds.), The Use of Force
Military Power and International Politics, p. 469.

[]

,
, ,
.
. ,

,
. ,
,
, .
,
. .

? ,
.

, ,
11. 2001. ,
2003, ,
. ,

,
.
-
,
. ,
,
. .
, , ,

.32

-.33
32 Daniel N. Nelson, Great Power and Global Insecurity, in: Heinz Grtner, Adrian Hyde-Price, Erich Reiter, (eds.), Europes New Security Challenges, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, London, 2001, p. 356.
33 Heinz Grtner, Europen Security, the Transatlantic Link, and Crisis Management, in: Heinz
Grtner, Adrian Hyde-Price, Erich Reiter, (eds.), Europes New Security Challenges, p. 134.

[]

,
.

.
-,
.
, .
,
.
,
.
,
,
-.
,
-.

, -
.
.

[]

:
1. Art J.R., Waltz N. K. (eds.) (2004), The Use of Force Military Power and
International Politics, Sixth Edition, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc,
New York.
2. Bennett C., :
, : . (.)
(2004), , ,
, . 30-36.
3. Biscop S., The Europen Security Strategy, Implementing a Distinctive Approach
to Security, Royal Institute for International Relations, Internet, 02/03/06,
http://www.ir-ri-kiib.be.
4. Grtner H., Hyde-Price A., Reiter E., (eds.) (2001), Europes New Security
Challenges, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, London.
5. ., . .,
, : . . (.), (2003),
, ,
, , . 244-264.
6. Kagan R. (2003), Of Paradise and Power (America and Europe in the New World
Order), Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
7. Kegley W. C. (2003), Jr, The Carasteristics, Causes and Controls of the New
Global Terrorism: An Introduction, in: Kegley W.C, Jr. (ed.), The New
Global Terrorism, Pearson Education, New Yersey.
8. Mynten G. and Walklate S., Criminology and Terrorism, British Journal of
Criminology, 28. July, 2005, . 121.
9. NATO-Russia Action Plan on Terrorism, Internet, 06/03/06, http://www.nato.
int/docu/ basictxt/b041209a-e.htm.
10. NATO and Russia tackle terror at sea, Internet, 07/03/06, http://www.nato.int/
docu/ update/2006/02-february/e0217b.htm.
11. , 10-11. ,
. , . . () (2001),
, , , . 102103.
12. Partnership Action Plan Against Terrorism, The Prague Summit and
NATOs Transformation (2003), NATO Public Diplomacy Division, Brussels,
p. 8793.
13. Prague Summit 2002 NATO in the 21st Century (2002), NATO Public
Diplomacy Division, Brussels.
14. Report on the Partnership Action Plan against terrorism, Internet, 09/03/06,
http://www.nato.int/docu/ basictxt/b040623be.htm.
[]

15. Security Trough Partnership (2005), NATO Public Diplomacy Division

Distribution Unit, Brussels.
16. . . (2002), , , .
17. Sorel J-M., Some Questions About Definitions of Terrorism and the Fight
Against Its Financing, EJIL (2003), VOL. 14, No. 2, p. 365378.
18. Falk R. (2003), The Great Terror War, Olive Branch Press, New York.
19. ,
, Internet, 11/09/05, http://
www.managment.org.yu/ pdf/uslovi_i_ obaveze.part.pdf.
20. Freedom and fear are at war, National Stratedy for Combating Terrorism.
21. Wittkopf R., Kegley W. C. (2004), World Politics (Trend & Transformation),
Ninth edition, Thomson & Wadsworth, Belmont.
22. Carr F, Ifantis K. (1996), NATO in the New Europen Order, Macmillan Press,
St. Martins Press, London New York.
23. . (2003), , , .

[]

PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE NATO ARRANGEMENT

IN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM
Dalibor Keki
Police Academy, Belgrade
Abstract: The author explains NATO participation in the fight against contemporary
terrorism. In order to enlarge the coalition of states in the fight against terrorism,
NATO has made the Partnership Action Plan against Terrorism, in which various
models of exercises, seminars and workshops have been worked out. NATO has also
made a separate NATO-Russia Action Plan on Terrorism so that this big country
would also be included directly in the front of these countries.

[]


, , ()
, , ,
. , ,
, 1215 . ,
, .
, , :
10 (1.000 ) (46 ),
. ,
, 25 (2.500 ),
. ,
.
(, , , , , .)
.
(Word,
-4, Times New Roaman, , 12 pt, ). ,

(16 30.000 ).
,
, .
,
,
,
: et al. ,
( : 1994,
1994, ). ,
: , ,
, , , , ( ),
, .

.

.

:
, 11000 , 22, ,
Police Academy, 11000 Belgrade, 22, Humska Street, Serbia and Montenegro,
:

[]