Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AND
INTERPRETATION
D. Bourdet
CONTENTS
Pages
1
1-1
1-2
2
2-1
2-2
2-3
3
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
4
4-1
4-2
- INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1
PURPOSE OF WELL TESTING .....................................................................................................1
INTERPRETATION METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................2
- WELL TESTING HARDWARE AND PROCEDURES.....................................................4
TYPES OF TESTS ......................................................................................................................4
WELL TESTING EQUIPMENT .....................................................................................................6
SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ....................................................................................8
- EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL FLOW REGIMES................................................................10
WELLBORE STORAGE ............................................................................................................10
RADIAL FLOW REGIME, SKIN (HOMOGENEOUS BEHAVIOR) ....................................................11
FRACTURED WELL (INFINITE CONDUCTIVITY FRACTURE) : LINEAR FLOW REGIME .................14
CLOSED RESERVOIR : PSEUDO STEADY STATE REGIME ..........................................................16
- CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................................18
INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE ..............................................................................................18
TEST DESIGN AND SUPERVISION ............................................................................................19
1 - Introduction
1-1 Purpose of well testing
1-1.1 Description of a well test
During a well test, a transient pressure response is created by a temporary change
in production rate. The well response is usually monitored during a relatively short
period of time, depending upon the test objectives. For well evaluation, tests are
frequently achieved in less than two days. In case of reservoir limit testing, several
months of pressure data may be needed.
In most cases, the flow rate is measured at surface while the pressure is recorded
down-hole. Before opening, the initial pressure pi is constant and uniform in the
reservoir. During flow time, the drawdown pressure response p is expressed :
( 1-1)
When the well is shut-in, the build-up pressure change p is estimated from the
last flowing pressure p(t=0) :
Rate, q
Pressure, p
( 1-2)
pi
t Dd
p BU
p Dd
p(
t=0)
drawdown
t BU
build-up
Time, t
Figure 1.1 Drawdown and build-up test sequence.
The pressure response is analyzed versus the elapsed time t since the start of the
period (time of opening or shut-in).
-1-
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
-2-
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
input
system
O
output
As opposed to the direct problem (O=IxS), the solution of the inverse problem is
usually not unique. It implies an identification process, and the interpretation
provides the model(s) whose behavior is identical to the behavior of the actual
reservoir.
ct = co (1 Sw )+ cw Sw + c f (psi-1, kPa-1)
The above reservoir and fluid parameters are used for calculation of the results.
After the interpretation model has been selected, they may always be changed or
adjusted if needed.
Additional data can be useful in some cases : production log, gradient surveys,
bubble point pressure etc. General information obtained from geologist and
geophysicists are required to validate the welltest interpretation results.
-3-
( 1-3)
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
pre ssu re , p
Flow ra te , Q a nd
Gas well test : specific testing methods are used to evaluate the deliverability
of gas wells (Absolute Open Flow Potential, AOFP) and the possibility of non
Darcy flow condition (rate dependent skin factor S'). The usual procedures are
Back Pressure test (Flow after Flow), Isochronal and Modified Isochronal tests.
pw s
pw f
C le an
up
In itia l Va riab le
s hu t-in
ra te
Sta b ilize d
ra te
T im e
-4-
Bu ild-u p
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
Flowh ead
B OP S tac k
Casing
Tu bing
Tes t tool
P ack er
Fixed point at
BOP
Fixed point
at Packer
Fixed point
at Packer
Fixed Rig (100 m maximum)
-5-
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
Open hole
Cased hole
Choke
maniflod
Heater
Gas
Rig HP
pump
Gas
manifold
Separator
Water
Air
pump
compressor
Water
Oil
Oil
manifold
Surge
tank
Burner
Transfer pump
-6-
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
Flow head : is equipped with several valves to allow flowing, pumping in the
well, wire line operation etc. The wellhead working pressure should be greater
than the well shut-in pressure. The Emergency Shut Down is a fail safe system
to close the wing valve remotely.
Choke manifold : is used to control the rate by flowing the well through a
calibrated orifice. A system of twin valves allows to change the choke (positive
and adjustable chokes) without shutting in the well. The downstream pressure
must be less than half the upstream pressure.
Heater : Heating the effluent may be necessary to prevent hydrate formation in
high pressure gas wells (the temperature is reduced after the gas expansion
through the choke). Heaters are also used in case of high viscosity oil.
Test separator : In a three phases test separator, the effluent hits several plates
in order to separate the gas from the liquid phase. A mist extractor is located
before the gas outlet. The oil and water phases are separated by gravity. The oil
and water lines are equipped with positive displacement metering devices, the
gas line with an orifice meter. Surface samples are taken at the separator oil and
gas lines for further recombination in laboratory.
Oil and gas disposal : The oil rate can be measured with a gauge tank (or a
surge tank in case of H2S). Oil and gas are frequently burned. Onshore, a flare
pit is installed at a safe distance from the well. Offshore, two burners are
available on the rig for wind constraint. Compressed air and water are injected
together with the hydrocarbon fluids to prevent black smoke production and oil
drop out.
Gas
Effluent
Water
Oil
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
Down hole valve : By closing the well down hole, the pressure response is
representative of the reservoir behavior earlier than in case of surface shut-in
(see wellbore storage effect in Section 3-1). DST are generally short tests.
Several types of down hole valve are available, operated by translation, rotation
or annular pressure. A sample of reservoir fluid can be taken when the tester
valve is closed.
Bottom hole sampler : Fluid samples can also be taken with a wire line bottom
hole sampler. During sampling, the well is produced at low rate.
RFT, MDT :The Repeat Formation Tester and the Modular Formation
Dynamics Tester are open hole wire line tools. They are primary used to
measure the vertical changes of reservoir pressure (pressure gradient), and to
take bottom hole samples. From the pressure versus depth data, fluid contacts
(oilwater OWC and gasoil GOC) are located, communication or presence of
sealing boundaries between layers can be established. RFT and MDT can also
provide a first estimate of the horizontal and vertical permeability near the well
by analysis of the pressure versus time response.
-8-
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
Lubricator valve
Riser
Retainer valve
Sub sea valve
BOP stack
Landing string
Fluted hanger
Fixed
point
Slip joint
Test tools
Fixed
point
Packer
Safety procedures : All equipment must be checked and tested. The working
pressure must be greater than the expected pressures from wellhead to
separator. A pressure test is made to ensure there is no leak at the different
pieces of equipment, and through connecting pipes. The emergency shut down
systems and downhole safety valves are able to function. The criteria for
opening and flowing the well must have been defined (in daylight or not),
safety meeting are organized prior the first opening of the well (definition of
the safe area, possibility of hot work during flowing time etc.)
Environment : No damage to the environment is a major concern when testing
wells. Flaring for long periods is often not allowed. The test program is defined
in order to minimize the volume of emission when burning. If possible the
effluent is exported, in some cases the gas is re-injected. When testing offshore,
drop out must be minimized.
-9-
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
Rate, q
Pressure, p
When a well is opened, the production at surface is first due to the expansion of
the fluid in the wellbore, and the reservoir contribution is negligible. After any
change of surface rate, there is a time lag between the surface production and the
sandface rate. For a shut-in period, the wellbore storage effect is called afterflow.
q surface
q sand face
Time, t
Figure 3.1 Wellbore storage effect. Sand face and surface rates.
rw
pi
pw
Figure 3.2 Wellbore storage effect. Pressure profile.
- 10 -
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
C =
V
= co Vw (Bbl/psi, m3/kPa)
p
( 3-4)
where :
co : liquid compressibility (psi-1, kPa-1)
Vw : wellbore volume (Bbl, m3)
p =
Dp
qB
t (psi, kPa)
24C
( 3-5)
mWBS
0
Dt
C=
qB
(Bbl/psi, m3/kPa)
24mWBS
- 11 -
( 3-6)
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
rw
pi
S=0
pw
rw
pi
S>0
pw(S=0)
pw(S>0)
Dp(skin)
Figure 3.5 Radial flow regime. Pressure profile. Damaged well, positive skin
factor.
rw
rwe
pi
pw(S<0)
S<0
pw(S=0)
Figure 3.6 Radial flow regime. Pressure profile. Stimulated well, negative skin
factor.
- 12 -
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
3-2.2 Skin
The skin is a dimensionless parameter. It characterizes the well condition : for a
damaged well S > 0, and for a stimulated well S < 0.
kh
pSkin (field units)
1412
. qB
kh
S=
pSkin (metric units)
1842qB
S=
( 3-7)
Damaged well (S > 0) : poor contact between the well and the reservoir (mudcake, insufficient perforation density, partial penetration) or invaded zone
Stimulated well (S < 0) : surface of contact between the well and the reservoir
increased (fractured or horizontal well) or acid stimulated zone
rwe = rw e S (ft, m)
( 3-8)
Dp
slope m
Dp(1hr)
0
Log(Dt)
- 13 -
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
p = 162.6
p = 2121
k
qB
+
3
.
23
0
.
87
S
log t + log
(psi, field units)
kh
ct rw2
k
qB
5.09 + 0.87 S (kPa, metric units) ( 3-9)
log t + log
2
kh
ct rw
Results:
qB
(mD.ft, field units)
m
qB
kh = 2121
(m2.m, metric units)
m
kh = 162.6
( 3-10)
k
S = 1151
. 1 hr log
+
3
.
23
(field units)
ct rw2
m
k
S = 1151
. 1 hr log
+ 5.09 (metric units)
2
ct rw
m
( 3-11)
xf
- 14 -
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
Figure 3.9 Infinite conductivity fracture. Geometry of the flow lines. Linear
and radial flow regimes.
p = 4.06
qB
hx f
p = 619
.
qB
hx f
t : the
( 3-12)
Dp
slope mLF
0
0
SQRT(Dt)
Figure 3.10 Infinite conductivity fracture. Specialized analysis with the
pressure versus the square root of time.
x f = 4.06
qB
ct k hmLF
x f = 619
.
qB
ct k hmLF
- 15 -
( 3-13)
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
re
rw
pi
pw
Figure 3-11 Closed reservoir. The boundaries are not reached, infinite
reservoir behavior: the pressure profile expands.
"
!
!
"
"
"
!
"
pi
#
rw
#
#
re
pw
- 16 -
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
pi
re
rw
pw
Figure 3-13 Closed reservoir. Pseudo steady state regime : the pressure
profile drops.
p = 0.234
qB
qB
A
t + 162.6
log 2 log(C A ) + 0.351 + 0.87 S (psi, field units)
ct hA
kh rw
p = 4.168x102
qB
qB
A
t + 2121
log 2 log(C A ) + 0.351 + 0.87 S (kPa,
ct hA
kh rw
( 3-14)
metric units)
5050
pi
pressure, psi
5000
4950
p-
4900
4850
4800
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
time, hours
Figure 3.14 Drawdown and build-up pressure response. Linear scale.
Closed system.
hA = 0.234
qB
(cu ft, field units)
ct m *
- 17 -
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
hA = 4.168x102
qB
(m3, metric units)
ct m *
( 3-15)
During shut-in, the pressure stabilizes to the average reservoir pressure p ( < pi ) .
4 - Conclusion
4-1 Interpretation procedure
4-1.1 The different analysis scales
Straight lines analysis on specialized scale is not the preferred interpretation
method. For a given period of the test, the change in pressure p is plotted on loglog scale versus the elapsed time t. This data plot is completed with the derivative
of the pressure (the semi-log slope), and it compared to a set of dimensionless
theoretical pressure and derivative type curves.
1.0E+03
pressure
1.0E+02
derivative
1.0E+01
1
1.0E+00
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
1.0E+00
1.0E+01
1.0E+02
Dt, hours
A large number of interpretation model is available for the usual well conditions
(well with wellbore storage and skin, fractured, horizontal, partial penetration
etc.), reservoir heterogeneities and boundary system. The shape of the log-log data
plot defines the well behavior, and therefore the interpretation model(s) to be used.
By adjusting the match of the pressure and derivative data plot on the
dimensionless theoretical curve, the relevant well and reservoir parameters are
estimated.
- 18 -
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
pD & pD'
1.0E+02
1.0E+01
slope 1
0.5
1.0E+00
1.0E-01
1.0E-01
1.0E+00
1.0E+01
1.0E+02
1.0E+03
tD/CD
Figure 4.2 Pressure and derivative type-curve for a well with wellbore storage
and skin, homogeneous reservoir.
The pressure and derivative log-log match is confirmed with a match of the
pressure type-curve on semi-log scale to adjust accurately the parameters. A
simulation of the complete test history is presented on linear scale in order to
control the rates, any changes in the well behavior, the average pressure etc.
D.B.W.
D. Bourdet
2001
- 20 -