Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison A36 A283 GR C PDF
Comparison A36 A283 GR C PDF
A 36
A283 Gr C
(Thickness up to 19 mm)
Si
0,4
0,4
Cu
0,2
0,2
The chemical composition between ASTM A36 and ASTM A 283 Gr C differ only on Mn content,
The effect of Mn and other element to the weldability can be known by Carbon Equivalen (CE) calculation
The formula CE = C + Si/24 + Mn/6 + Ni/40 + Cr/5 + Mo/4 + V/4
where the element in % weigth
(5.2)
ASTM A 36
CE = 0.25 + 0.4 / 24
= 0.266 %
ASTM A 283 Gr C
CE = 0.24 + 0.4/24 + 0.9/6 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0
= 0.406 %
It seem that CE of A 283 Gr C is higher than ASTM A 36. Base on this A 283 Gr C is litte bit difficult to weld
compare to A 36.
Refering to ASME IX the weldability of material is classified in to P-Number. Both A 283 Gr C and A 36 is group
in to the same P number 1. It mean that once we make the WPS/PQR with A-36, it also valid for A 283 Gr C.(5.3)
3. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
Material
Yield
Strength
ksi(Mpa)
Tensile
Strength
ksi(Mpa)
Elongation Elongation
8 inch
2 inch
A 36
36(250)
58-80
(400-550)
20
23
A 283
Gr C
30(205)
55-75
(380-515)
22
25
The mechanical propertiies between A 36 and A 283 Gr C are almost the same which mean the mechanical prop
range are not big different.
4. CONCLUSION
Base on the above explanation, it can consider that A 36 can be used to alternative substitution of A 283 Gr C.
In order to decide A 36 as substitution of A 283 Gr C further Engineering approval is required.
5. REFERENCE
5.1. ASTM A 36 & ASTM A 283 Gr C Vol. 01.04, Edition. 1998
5.2. Introduction to the Physical Metallurgy of Welding, Kenneth Easterling, Butterworth Heinemann, 1992
5.3. ASME IX Code : Welding and Brazing Qualification, Edition 1998
Page 1