Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Debra Mayes v. United Steel Workers, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the lower court, the appellate court dispensed with oral argument as it would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-12-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1918

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the lower court, the appellate court dispensed with oral argument as it would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Debra Mayes v. United Steel Workers, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the lower court, the appellate court dispensed with oral argument as it would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1918

    DEBRA MAYES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STEEL WORKERS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00149-GCM)

    Submitted:

    December 5, 2011

    Decided:

    December 15, 2011

    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Debra Mayes, Appellant Pro Se.


    Narendra K. Ghosh, PATTERSON
    HARKAVY, LLP, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Debra
    granting

    the

    Mayes

    appeals

    Defendants

    dismiss her complaint.


    reversible error.

    Fed.

    the
    R.

    district

    Civ.

    P.

    12(b)(6)

    adequately

    motion

    to

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    See Mayes v. United Steel Workers, No.

    3:11-cv-00149-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2011).


    argument

    order

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    by the district court.

    oral

    courts

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like