Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Susan Jeanette Smith Debbie Marcus Dawn Smith, and Others Similarly Situated v. Roy Beck, D/B/A Twin Peaks, 108 F.3d 1373, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views1 page
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from March 10, 1997. It involves an appeal by Susan Jeanette Smith, Debbie Marcus, Dawn Smith and others of a district court's denial of relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Roy Beck doing business as Twin Peaks. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion provided in case number CA-96-258-3-19. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 108 F.3d 1373 Docket: 96-1455

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from March 10, 1997. It involves an appeal by Susan Jeanette Smith, Debbie Marcus, Dawn Smith and others of a district court's denial of relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Roy Beck doing business as Twin Peaks. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion provided in case number CA-96-258-3-19. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views1 page

    Susan Jeanette Smith Debbie Marcus Dawn Smith, and Others Similarly Situated v. Roy Beck, D/B/A Twin Peaks, 108 F.3d 1373, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from March 10, 1997. It involves an appeal by Susan Jeanette Smith, Debbie Marcus, Dawn Smith and others of a district court's denial of relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Roy Beck doing business as Twin Peaks. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion provided in case number CA-96-258-3-19. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    108 F.

    3d 1373

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Susan Jeanette SMITH; Debbie Marcus; Dawn Smith, and
    others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    v.
    Roy BECK, d/b/a Twin Peaks, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-1455.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 27, 1997.
    Decided March 10, 1997.

    Susan Jeanette Smith, Debbie Marcus, Dawn Smith, Appellants Pro Se.
    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Beck, No. CA-96-258-3-19 (D.S.C.
    Apr. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like