Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Tribble, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Carrol Scott Tribble appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Tribble's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in its July 15, 1997 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented for consideration.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-06-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7060

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carrol Scott Tribble appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Tribble's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in its July 15, 1997 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented for consideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Tribble, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carrol Scott Tribble appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Tribble's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in its July 15, 1997 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented for consideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7060

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CARROL SCOTT TRIBBLE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-95-834, CA-97-1380-8-13)
    Submitted:

    May 28, 1998

    Decided:

    June 9, 1998

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Christopher Lance Sheek, WELCH & ASSOCIATES, Greenwood, South
    Carolina, for Appellant. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carrol Scott Tribble seeks to appeal the district court's
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. United States v. Tribble, Nos. CR-95-834,
    CA-97-1380-8-13 (D.S.C. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like