Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Telly v. Rushton, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Alonzo Robert Telly under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's denial of relief on Telly's petition and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's opinion dated June 2, 1997. The Fourth Circuit determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-10-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6885

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Alonzo Robert Telly under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's denial of relief on Telly's petition and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's opinion dated June 2, 1997. The Fourth Circuit determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Telly v. Rushton, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Alonzo Robert Telly under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's denial of relief on Telly's petition and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's opinion dated June 2, 1997. The Fourth Circuit determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6885

    ALONZO ROBERT
    Telley,

    TELLY,

    a/k/a

    Alonzo

    Robert
    Petitioner - Appellant,

    versus
    COLIE RUSHTON; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
    OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (CA-96-3580-6-18AK)
    Submitted:

    September 25, 1997

    Decided:

    October 9, 1997

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Alonzo Robert Telly, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district courts
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. Telly v. Rushton, No. CA-96-3580-6-18AK
    (D.S.C. June 2, 1997) We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like