Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Yancey v. United States, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Larry Yancey filed an action against the United States and the Social Security Administration that was denied by the district court. Yancey appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals denied Yancey's motion for summary reversal and did not require oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-08-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1531

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Yancey filed an action against the United States and the Social Security Administration that was denied by the district court. Yancey appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals denied Yancey's motion for summary reversal and did not require oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Yancey v. United States, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Yancey filed an action against the United States and the Social Security Administration that was denied by the district court. Yancey appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals denied Yancey's motion for summary reversal and did not require oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1531

    LARRY YANCEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMMISSIONER OF THE
    SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1146-1)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 1998

    Decided:

    August 5, 1998

    Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Larry Yancey, Appellant Pro Se.
    Charlotte Jefferson Hardnett,
    SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry Yancey appeals the district courts order denying his
    action. We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Yancey v. United States, No. CA-97-1146-1 (M.D.N.C.
    Apr. 7, 1998). We deny Yanceys motion for summary reversal. We
    also dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like