Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paris Valentine v. Carol P. Getty United States Attorney, 972 F.2d 344, 4th Cir. (1992)
Paris Valentine v. Carol P. Getty United States Attorney, 972 F.2d 344, 4th Cir. (1992)
2d 344
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1256H)
Paris Valentine, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
Affirmed.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Paris Valentine, a federal inmate, appeals from the district court's order
dismissing for want of jurisdiction his petition challenging the validity of a
parole detainer issued by the United States Parole Commission. Our review of
the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without
merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Valentine
v. Getty, No. CA-92-1256-H (D. Md. May 12, 1992). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED