Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hayes v. SEC, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Robert Hayes appealed a district court order dismissing his civil complaint against the Securities & Exchange Commission, Federal Trade Commission, and United States Department of Commerce. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding legal precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-12-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1784

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Hayes appealed a district court order dismissing his civil complaint against the Securities & Exchange Commission, Federal Trade Commission, and United States Department of Commerce. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Hayes v. SEC, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Hayes appealed a district court order dismissing his civil complaint against the Securities & Exchange Commission, Federal Trade Commission, and United States Department of Commerce. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The unpublished opinion is not binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1784

    ROBERT HAYES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION; FEDERAL
    TRADE COMMISSION; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
    COMMERCE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv01786-AMD)

    Submitted:

    December 13, 2007

    Decided:

    December 17, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Hayes, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert

    Hayes

    appeals

    dismissing his civil complaint.


    find no reversible error.

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court. Hayes v. Security & Exchange Commn,


    No. 1:07-cv-01786-AMD (D. Md. July 25, 2007).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like