Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Charles Brooks, III v. John Doe, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Charles Brooks, III appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Brooks' appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. The court also denied Brooks' motion for transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-02-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7629

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Charles Brooks, III appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Brooks' appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. The court also denied Brooks' motion for transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Charles Brooks, III v. John Doe, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Charles Brooks, III appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Brooks' appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. The court also denied Brooks' motion for transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7629

    CHARLES BROOKS, III,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN DOE, Warden Senior of Sussex II State Prison; VARGO,
    Assistant Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (2:11-cv-00568-MSD-FBS)

    Submitted:

    February 23, 2012

    Decided:

    February 28, 2012

    Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Brooks, III, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles

    Brooks,

    III,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28


    U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2006).
    that

    this

    appeal

    is

    We have reviewed the record and find

    frivolous.

    Accordingly,

    we

    dismiss

    appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Brooks v.

    Doe, No. 2:11-cv-00568-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2011).


    deny

    Brooks

    expense.
    legal
    before

    pending

    motion

    for

    transcripts

    at

    the

    We also

    government

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like