Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thorpe v. Kupec, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Gary E. Thorpe filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, denying Thorpe's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The unpublished opinion from the Court of Appeals is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7517

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Gary E. Thorpe filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, denying Thorpe's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The unpublished opinion from the Court of Appeals is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    Thorpe v. Kupec, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Gary E. Thorpe filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief, which was denied by the district court. The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, denying Thorpe's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The unpublished opinion from the Court of Appeals is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7517

    GARY E. THORPE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    ROBERT KUPEC; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE
    OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-01-2439-S)

    Submitted:

    January 17, 2002

    Decided:

    January 29, 2002

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Gary E. Thorpe, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Gary E. Thorpe seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. Thorpe v. Kupec, No. CA-01-2439-S
    (D. Md. filed Aug. 22, 2001; entered Aug. 23, 2001).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like