Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lionel Jones v. Charles E. Hill Lieutenant Brown Sergeant Judd Officer Robeson, 70 F.3d 112, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    Lionel Jones filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several prison officials which was denied by the district court. Jones appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-11-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 70 F.3d 112 Docket: 95-7331

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lionel Jones filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several prison officials which was denied by the district court. Jones appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    Lionel Jones v. Charles E. Hill Lieutenant Brown Sergeant Judd Officer Robeson, 70 F.3d 112, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lionel Jones filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several prison officials which was denied by the district court. Jones appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    70 F.

    3d 112

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Lionel JONES, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Charles E. HILL; Lieutenant Brown; Sergeant Judd; Officer
    Robeson, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 95-7331.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: October 17, 1995
    Decided: November 15, 1995

    Lionel Jones, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Hill, No. CA-95-124-5-CT-BO
    (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like