Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael Lee Roy v. Lorraine Singleton, 103 F.3d 120, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Michael Lee Roy's civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that it did not have jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 103 F.3d 120 Docket: 96-7155

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Michael Lee Roy's civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that it did not have jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views1 page

    Michael Lee Roy v. Lorraine Singleton, 103 F.3d 120, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Michael Lee Roy's civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's reasoning that it did not have jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    103 F.

    3d 120

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Michael Lee ROY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Lorraine SINGLETON, Defendant--Appellee.
    No. 96-7155.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Argued Nov. 19, 1996.
    Decided Dec. 2, 1996.

    Michael Lee Roy, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action for lack of
    jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Roy v. Singleton, No. CA-96-369 (E.D.Va. July 17, 1996). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like