Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Christopher Mosby v. Officer Sykes, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Christopher Mosby's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Sykes. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its September 24, 2014 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-01-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7458

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Christopher Mosby's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Sykes. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its September 24, 2014 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Christopher Mosby v. Officer Sykes, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Christopher Mosby's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Sykes. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its September 24, 2014 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7458

    CHRISTOPHER MOSBY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    OFFICER SYKES, of Brunswick Co. Sheriff Department,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:12-ct-03246-FL)

    Submitted:

    January 22, 2015

    Decided:

    January 27, 2015

    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Christopher Mosby, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher Mosby appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Mosby v. Sykes, No. 5:12-ct-03246-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24,

    2014).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like