Cooling Water Sump Model Studies Through CFD Analysis

You might also like

You are on page 1of 6

COOLING WATER SUMP MODEL STUDIES THROUGH CFD ANALYSIS

Dr. N.K.Singh, DGM, COE, BHEL R&D, Hyderabad,


ABSTRACT
Cooling water pumps are widely used in power
plants and in other industries such as steel plants, oil, gas,
cement and coal industries to pump required water for
cooling purpose. Cooling water is drawn through wide
open channels from cooling tower basins through sump.
This Cooling water sump configuration design is based on
power plant unit ratings, discharge of water need to pump

Mr. T. Vijaya Sarathi, Assistant Professor, ME, BVRITN


guide vanes with a cross baffles the flow has become stable
and also intensity of swirl angles reduced to an acceptable
limit for all the combinations of any four pumps working
simultaneously out of five pumps in the cooling water
sump.
Keywords: Sump geometry, Cooling water pump, Swirl
meter, vorticity, Vortimeter, Swirl angle, Vortex breakers,
Spurs, Log gate.
1.0 INTRODUCTION

and hence, the overall design is thus based on site


The Cooling water sump consists of stop-log gate,

specification, no. of pump chambers & pumps capacity


keeping into consideration. While pumping cooling water
from basins, some swirls get generated at the pump intakes.
Due to this swirl action, some mechanical problems arise
which causes severe damage to the pumps and their

forebay, pier walls, and 5-pump intakes. Out of five cooling


water pumps any four pumps are working simultaneously,
and the fifth pump remains as standby. Water enters from
the two inlets which are at right angles (i.e. 90o and 180o)
apart from water basin, and passes through forebay, stop-

supports.
Experimental tests were carried out on a physical
scaled down model to develop sump chambers design that
to prevent vortex formations and in turn reduce the swirls

log gate and then enters in to the five cooling water sump
chambers. From there water is supplied through the pumps
to the required place.
The area immediately up-stream of the pump

around the cooling water pump intakes. This Experimental


studies have been replaced with CFD Analysis to reduce
Time and Cost.
In the present study, two sump configurations have
been included. The first sump geometry has no vortex
breaking device and the second geometry was provided
with vortex breakers, spurs, and guide vanes with a cross
baffle.

Structured multi-block grids were generated in

ANSYS ICEM-CFD and necessary grid refinements were


done around pump intakes. Proper boundary conditions
were set-up at inlet and outlet boundaries in CFX-pre and
converged flow solutions were obtained for various cases
using CFX-11 solver. The objective is to characterize the
flow in the vicinity of pump intakes, compute swirl angles
and study the influence of vortex breakers, spurs in
reducing the swirl in and around pump intakes.
Swirls were computed at each case and influence of
vortex breakers in minimizing the swirl to acceptable value
for maximum and minimum water levels in the sump was
established. Results of CFD analysis have been presented
in the form of various plots, like streamlines, velocity and
vorticity vectors, computed swirl angles at various
locations. After inclusion of vortex breakers, spurs and

chamber is called forebay. The Sump is usually rectangular


and has flat floor. The primary purpose of the sump is to
provide stored volume and to damp out any extremely
disturbed flow pattern arising from up-stream zones. The
sump and intakes should be designed for good flow
conditions at the pump intakes irrespective of the type of
pump.
Stop-log gate is used to reduce the disturbances in
the flow at the top levels and is used to control the flow
distribution, pier walls are used to divide the water channel
in to five pump chambers and to distribute the flow equally
in to the five pump chambers.
The cooling water pumps are designed for rated
and maximum flow capacities of 19000 m 3/hr and 22800
m3/hr respectively. The Channels hail from two different
cooling tower basins with 90 and 180 degree bends
respectively. They join the 960 mm wide common channel
which leads to the forebay. The forebay widens from 960
mm to 2850 mm in a length of 50 meters up to the pump
house. The floor descends from 3.30 meters to 8.50 meters.
These forebay leads further to pump chambers. The forebay
leads to five pump chambers which are situated in the

COOLING WATER SUMP MODEL STUDIES THROUGH CFD ANALYSIS


Dr. N.K.Singh, DGM, COE, BHEL R&D, Hyderabad,
Pump House. These Five cooling water pump chambers are

Mr. T. Vijaya Sarathi, Assistant Professor, ME, BVRITN


ICEM-CFD takes GEOM as Default part name.

same in all dimensions (i.e. 450mm wide and 800mm high)


which are separated by pier walls of 100mm gap between
each chamber.
Fig. 4.6 CW Sump original geometry without vortex breakers
and spurs

2.0

Fig. 4.7 CW Sump original geometry with vortex breakers,


spurs and guide vanes

SCOPE OF WORK
3 D modeling of fluid domain in water channels, fore bay,
pump chambers consisting of stop log, pier walls, pump
intakes, vortex breakers and spurs.Grid generation and
Boundary set-up at inlet, outlets

and free surfaces of

sump.Obtain converged CFD solution without inclusions


and with inclutions of vortex breakersAnalysis and post
processing of results for flow distribution velocity pattern
and estimation of swirls for the maximum.Grid refinements
and obtain solutions with the other turbulent models, like kw and SST models. Arrive the most optimum models and
boundary conditions and grid independent solutions.
Establishment of CFD methodology for doing CW Pump
Sump Model studies. Consolidation of results, finding the
variation of swirl angles along the radial locations of the
pipe

Fig. 4.11 CW Sump Model Surface Mesh


Fig. 4.12 CW Sump Structured Volume (Hexa) Mesh
4.0 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
The CFD Analysis is carried out using CFX-Pre,
CFX-Solver, and CFX-Post modules. ANSYS CFX-Pre is
the physics definition pre-processor for ANSYS CFX. It is
used to import meshes produced in a variety of mesh
generation software packages and to select physical models
used in the CFD simulation
CFD analysis is carried out to understand the flow
through the sump, predict the pressure distribution and
velocity profiles at various locations of the sump model.
ANSYS CFX-11 software tool is used for analysis purpose.
This interactive process is the second pre-

3.0 MODELING & GRID GENERATION


Flow domain of cooling water sump consists of

processing stage and is used to create input required by the

water channels, fore bay, stop-log gate, pier walls, pump

Solver. The mesh files are loaded into the physics pre-

chambers, and five pump intakes in original geometry. 3-D

processor, ANSYS CFX-Pre. The physical models that are

modeling was made through ICEM-CFD and was

to be included in the simulation are selected. Fluid

discredited and shown the top view in Fig.3

properties and boundary conditions are specified. Physics

The scale down model of CW Sump original geometry

definition involves defining the physical parameters such as

without vortex breakers & spurs and CW Sump original

pressure, temperature, mass flow, etc. and other boundary

geometry with vortex breakers & spurs have been

conditions relevant for the problem.

modeled in ICEM-CFD.

Preprocessing involves the following steps.

The various parts of 3-D modeling were created


through ICEM-CFD which is shown in Fig. 5 i.e.
TOP, BOTTOM, BACK, INLET1, INLET2, PUMPS, OUTLET1,
OUTLET2,

OUTLET3,OUTLET4,

OUTLET5,

WALL,

Importing the mesh assembly and region


definition:

As described earlier the sump model is meshed in

STOP_LOG, CHAM1, CHAM2, CHAM3, CHAM4, CHAM5,

ICEM-CFD. The mesh file with .cfx5 extension

V_BREAKERS,

is imported to CFX-Pre. The boundary conditions

CROSS_BAFFLE

SPURS,

GUIDE_

VANES

AND

COOLING WATER SUMP MODEL STUDIES THROUGH CFD ANALYSIS


Dr. N.K.Singh, DGM, COE, BHEL R&D, Hyderabad,

Mr. T. Vijaya Sarathi, Assistant Professor, ME, BVRITN

file (.bci) specifies the inlet, outlet, top, front,

combinations of four pumps running simultaneously out of

back, and other regions of the model.

available five pumps of Cooling Water Sump model.

Defining boundary conditions in CFX-pre such as


inlets, outlets, wall etc.
In CFX-pre, it takes Default boundary condition
as wall.

Fig. 4.13(a) and Fig.4.13 (b) have been shown defining


boundary conditions in CFX-pre.

Fig.4.13(a) Defining boundary conditions in CFX-pre

Fig. 4.13(b) Defining boundary conditions in CFX-pre


CFX-Solver
ANSYS CFX-Solver solves all the solution
variables for the simulation for the problem specification
generated in ANSYS CFX-Pre. The component that solves
the CFD problem is called the Solver. It produces the
required results in a non-interactive/batch process.

5.1 Swirl calculation


In the experimental set-up (carried out by
external agency), five vortimeters are placed in the five
pipe-intakes at height of 265 mm from the floor-level to
measure the rotation of the vanes of vortimeter. The
swirl angle is calculated experimentally using the
formula
1
Model discharge= (22800/3600)*(1/316)=
0.0200 m3/s
2
Area of pipe= 0.7854*0.142 =0.015394 m2
3
Axial velocity in pipe = 0.0200/0.015394 =
1.30 m/s
4
Peripheral velocity of vortimeter =
3.1416*0.130*N/60 = 0.0068068*N
D= Diameter of Vortimeter = 0.130 m
N= Rotations of Vortimeter = rpm
5
Vortex angle = (Peripheral velocity of
Vortimeter) / (Axial velocity of water in the
pipe)
Vortex/Swirl angle, Tan = (0.0068068*N) /
1.30=0.005236*N
= tan-1( Vr / Vy)
In
CFD
analysis, the swirl angle is calculated as follows:
1

Net directional Vorticity ( y) along flow in

pumps intakes i.e. y-axis,


2

Angular velocity, y = y /2
3

Fig.4.14 (a) Required convergence is obtained


for original sump model mesh

Rotation Velocity, Vr = y *r = y *0.07

4 Axial Velocity Vy along flow in pumps

Fig.4.14 (b) Required convergence is obtained

Where y and Vy are computed in CFX-post

for modified sump model mesh

Results using function calculator

Post Processing

5 Vortex/Swirl angle ()

CFX-Post is a flexible state-of-the-art postprocessor. It is designed to allow easy visualization,


qualitative and quantitative post-processing of the results of

5.2

Post Processing Results And Discussions

CFD simulations.
CFD converged solutions have been obtained for

5.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

20 cases, with maximum and minimum water levels for the

5. Post-processing results of CFD simulations


CFD converged solutions have been obtained for

two geometrical configurations of sump model without

20 cases, with maximum and minimum water levels for the

inclusion of vortex breakers and spurs, and sump model

two

with inclusion of vortex breakers and spurs, and for various

geometrical

configurations

and

for

various

COOLING WATER SUMP MODEL STUDIES THROUGH CFD ANALYSIS


Dr. N.K.Singh, DGM, COE, BHEL R&D, Hyderabad,
combinations of four pumps running simultaneously out of
available five pumps.
Various plots like streamline, vorticity and velocity profiles
at various locations have been shown. Swirl angles have
been computed using the net directional vorticity as
available in the result file of CFX-post

Mr. T. Vijaya Sarathi, Assistant Professor, ME, BVRITN

Fig.5.9 CW sump with inclusion of vortex breakers and spurs vector plot-500mm

Typical velocity vector plots for both sump


models at bell-mouth (i.e.110mm from floor level) are
shown in Fig.5.10 (a), Fig.5.10 (b), Fig.5.11 (a) and
Fig.5.11 (b). Similarly Fig.5.12 (a) and Fig.5.12 (b) shows

The stream-line plots for maximum water levels for the


both geometries of sump model have been shown in Fig.
5.1 (a) and Fig.5.1 (b). Similarly the stream-line plots for
minimum water levels for the both geometries of sump
model without inclusion, and sump model with inclusion of

the typical view of velocity components for both sump


models at height of 500mm from floor level. These Figures
show the variation of magnitude of velocity in vicinity of
pump intakes as colors indicate the magnitude of velocity
vectors accordingly have been shown in figures.

vortex breakers and spurs are shown in Fig.5.2 (a) and


Fig.5.2 (b).
In all these Figures, Pump 3 is off and Pumps 1, 2, 4, 5 are
working and the flow path colored with velocity magnitude
accordingly are being shown. The flow starting from inlet
and approaching through various sections of the sump
model and finally entering into various pump intakes can
be seen in Figures 5.1(a), 5.1(b), 5.2(a) and 5.2(b).
The

stream-line

plots

for

the

two

Fig.5.10 (b) velocity component sump without


vortex breakers and spurs vector plots- vector
plot at 110mm

geometrical

configurations show some improvements in terms of


location and type of recirculation. It is observed that flow
pattern and the recirculation intensity has got reduced to a
large extent after providing vortex breakers and spurs for
both maximum and minimum levels.

Fig.5.11 (a) CW sump without vortex breakers and


spurs vector plots (Swirl present)

Fig. 5.6(a) Sump without inclusion of


vortex breakers and spurs vector plot

Fig.5.11 (b) CW sump with vortex breakers and spurs vector


plots (Reduced Swirls)

Fig. 5.6(b) Sump with inclusion of


vortex breakers and spurs vector plot

Fig.5.7 CW sump with inclusion of vortex breakers and spurs -

.3 Computed Swirl Angles Without and With Inclusions of

vector plot-110 mm

Vortex Breakers, Spurs and Guide Vanes with cross baffle

Fig.5.8 CW sump with inclusion of vortex breakers and spurs vector plot-265mm

COOLING WATER SUMP MODEL STUDIES THROUGH CFD ANALYSIS


Dr. N.K.Singh, DGM, COE, BHEL R&D, Hyderabad,

Mr. T. Vijaya Sarathi, Assistant Professor, ME, BVRITN


CFD study was carried out for analyzing the flow
behavior of a cooling water sump Module.
From the study the following conclusion were made:

Converged solutions obtained for both the cases

Graph 5.1 (a): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.

with

level 1234 as working pumps

simultaneously for various combinations.

Graph 5.1 (b): Swirl angles without and with inclusions max.
level 1234 as working pumps

four

out

of

five

pumps

running

Post-processing done to extract various flow


parameters.

CFD analysis shows the effect of Vortex breakers


in reducing swirl around the pump intake and
overall improvement in flow behavior with

Graph 5.2 (a): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.

Vortex breakers, Spurs and Guide Vanes with a

level 1235 as working pumps

cross baffle.

Graph 5.2 (b): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.

level 1235 as working pumps

Results shown in various plots like streamline,


velocity vectors and swirl plots around

regions

of bell-mouth, pump intakes and at locations


where vortimeters were installed in experimental
studies.
Graph 5.3 (a): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.

Results available from experimental model tests

level 1245 as working pumps

have been compared with CFD results for various

Graph 5.3 (b): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.

cases and presented in various Tables.

level 1245 as working pumps

For varying nature of swirls in intake pipes, the


swirl angle vs working pumps plots for all modes
of operations show considerable reduction of
swirl with vortex breakers compared to original
geometry.

Graph 5.4 (a): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.
level 1345 as working pumps
Graph 5.4 (b): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.
level 1235 as working pumps

7.0 FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK


The CFD analysis will be carried out to improve the flow
behavior at the pump intakes by reducing the swirl
component with different cases.
It is proposed to modify the dimensions of Vortex breakers
and spurs, such that the swirl present at the bell-mouth is

Graph 5.5 (a): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.
level 2345 as working pumps
Graph 5.5 (b): Swirl angles without and with inclusions min.
level 2345 as working pumps

negligible.
To increase the effective use of CW sump the grids will be
further refined, and various turbulent models are to be used
in the CFD analysis.

6.0 CONCLUSIONS

COOLING WATER SUMP MODEL STUDIES THROUGH CFD ANALYSIS


Dr. N.K.Singh, DGM, COE, BHEL R&D, Hyderabad,

Mr. T. Vijaya Sarathi, Assistant Professor, ME, BVRITN

8.0 REFERENCES

Rajendran, V., Constantinescu, S.G. and Patel, V.C.

Constantinescu, S.G. and Patel, V.C. (1998). Numerical

(1999). Experimental validation of a numerical model of

model for simulation of pump-intake flow and vortices,

flow in pump-intakes bays, ASCE J. of Hydr. Engrg, Vol.

ASCE J. of Hydr. Engrg, Vol. 124, No. 2, February, 123-

125, No. 11, November, 1119-1126.

134.

Petrescu, V. and Constantinescu, S.G. (1993). The study

Tokyay, T. and Constantinescu, S.G. (2005), Large Eddy

of turbulent flows using a modified k- model, Scientific

Simulation

Bulletin of the Civil Engineering Institute, Bucharest,

and

Reynolds

Averaged

Navier

Stokes

Simulations of flow in a realistic pump intake: A validation

Romania, Vol. 36, No. 2, 43-60.

study, World Water and Environmental Resources

Kirkil, G., Constantinescu, S.G., and Ettema, R. (2005),

Congress, Alaska, May 2005.

The horseshoe vortex system around a circular bridge pier

Tokyay, T. and Constantinescu, S.G. (2005), Large Eddy

on

Simulation

Environmental Resources Congress, Alaska, May 2005.

and

Reynolds

Averaged

Navier

Stokes

equilibrium

scoured

bed,

World

Water

and

Simulations of flow in a realistic pump intake: A validation

Constantinescu, S.G. and Patel, V.C. (1998). Three-

study, World Water and Environmental Resources

dimensional numerical model of pump-intake flow and

Congress, Alaska, May 2005.

vortices,

Zeng, J., Constantinescu, S.G. and Weber, L. (2005),

Conference: Hydroinformatics 98, Editors Babovic, V and

Validation of a computational model to predict suspended

Larsen, L., 61-68, Danish Hydraulic Institute, August 1998,

and bed load sediment transport and equilibrium bed

Copenhagen, Denmark.

morphology in open channels, River and Coastal

Rajendran, V., Constantinescu, S.G. and Patel, V.C.

Estuarine Morphology Conference, University of Illinois,

(1998). Experiments on flow in a model water-pump

Urbana Champaign, Illinois, October 2005.

intake sump to validate a numerical model, Paper

Haque, M.D., Koken, M., Constantinescu, S.G. and

FEDSM98-5098, ASME Fluids Engineering Division

Weber, L. (2005), Use of a 3D RANS model to predict

Summer Meeting, June 1998, Washington, D.C., USA.

stratification effects related to fish passage at hydropower

Constantinescu, S.G. and Patel, V.C. (1997). Influence of

dams,

XXXI

st

International

Association

Hydraulic

Proceedings

of

the

Third

International

approach flow nonuniformity on vortices at a pump

Research Congress, Seoul, Korea, September 2005.

intake, Proceedings of the XXVIIth IAHR Congress,

Ansar, M., Nakato, T. and Constantinescu, S.G. (2002).

August 1997, San Francisco, California, USA

Numerical simulation of inviscid three-dimensional flows

Ansar, M., Constantinescu, S.G., Nakato, T. and Patel,

at single and dual pump intakes, IAHR Journal of

V.C. (1997). Numerical simulation of three-dimensional

Hydraulics Research, Vol. 40, No. 4, 461-470.

pump-approach flow distributions at a two-pump intake,

Mahesh, K., Constantinescu S.G., Apte, S., Iaccarino, G.,

Proceedings of the Symposium St-Venant, Ecole Nationale

Ham, F. and Moin, P. (2004) Large eddy simulation of

des Ponts et Chaussees, August 1997, Paris, France.

reacting turbulent flows in complex geometries, accepted

Muralidhar K, Sundararajan T, Computational Fluid Flow

for publication, ASME J. of Applied Mechanics.

and Heat transfer, Narosa Publishing Jouse, 2003

You might also like