Turbulence Models and Their Applications: 10 Indo German Winter Academy 2011

TURBULENCE MODELS AND
THEIR APPLICATIONS
Presented by:
T.S.D.Karthik
Department of Mechanical Engineering
IIT Madras
Guide: Prof. Franz Durst
10th Indo German Winter Academy 2011
Outline
3
Turbulence models introduction
Boussinesq hypothesis
Eddy viscosity concept
Zero equation model
One equation model
Two equation models
Algebraic stress model
Reyolds stress model
Comparison
Applications
Developments
Conclusion
Turbulence Models and Their Applications
Turbulence models
4
A turbulence model is a procedure to close the system of mean

flow equations.
For most engineering applications it is unnecessary to resolve
the details of the turbulent fluctuations.
Turbulence models allow the calculation of the mean flow
without first calculating the full time-dependent flow field.
We only need to know how turbulence affected the mean flow.
In particular we need expressions for the Reynolds stresses.
For a turbulence model to be useful it:
must have wide applicability,

be accurate,
simple,
and economical to run.
Common turbulence models

5
Classical models. Based on Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)

equations (time averaged):
Zero equation model: mixing length model.

One equation model
Two equation models: k- style models (standard, RNG, realizable), k-
model, and ASM.
Seven equation model: Reynolds stress model.
The number of equations denotes the number of additional PDEs that

are being solved.
Large eddy simulation. Based on space-filtered equations. Time

dependent calculations are performed. Large eddies are explicitly
calculated. For small eddies, their effect on the flow pattern is taken
into account with a sub-grid model of which many styles are
available.
DNS
Classification
6
Prediction Methods
7
Boussinesq hypothesis
8
Many turbulence models are based upon the Boussinesq

hypothesis.
It was experimentally observed that turbulence decays unless there is

shear in isothermal incompressible flows.
Turbulence was found to increase as the mean rate of deformation
increases.
Boussinesq proposed in 1877 that the Reynolds stresses could be linked
to the mean rate of deformation.
Using the suffix notation where i, j, and k denote the x-, y-, and
z-directions respectively, viscous stresses are given by:
ui u j
ij
x
j
i
Similarly, link Reynolds stresses to the mean rate of

deformation
Eddy Viscosity Concept

9
One of the most widely used concept

Reynolds stress tensor
ij
U i
U j
ui ' u j ' t
x
xi
j
A new quantity appears: the turbulent viscosity or eddy viscosity

(t ).
The second term is added to make it applicable to normal
turbulent stress.
The turbulent viscosity depends on the flow, i.e. the state of
turbulence.
The turbulent viscosity is not homogeneous, i.e. it varies in space.
Eddy Viscosity Concept

10
It is, however, assumed to be isotropic. It is the same in

all directions. This assumption is valid for many flows,
but not for all (e.g. flows with strong separation or swirl).
The turbulent viscosity may be expressed as
t uclc (or ) lc2 / tc
This concept assumes that Reynolds stress tensor can be

characterized by a single length and time scales.
Major Drawbacks
11
Interaction among eddies is not elastic as in the case for molecular

interactions in kinetic theory of gases.
For many turbulent flows, the length and time scale of characteristic
eddies is not small compared with the flow domain (boundary
dominated flows).
The eddy viscosity is a scalar quantity which may not be true for simple
turbulent shear flows. It also fails to distinguish between plane shear,
plane strain and rotating plane shear flows.
Successful 2D shear flows. Erroneous results for simple shear flows

such as wall jets and channel flows with varying wall roughness.
Zero Equation Model - Mixing

Length Model
12
On dimensional grounds one can express the kinematic turbulent

viscosity as the product of a velocity scale and a length scale:
t (m 2 / s) (m / s) (m)
If we then assume that the velocity scale is proportional to the

length scale and the gradients in the velocity (shear rate, which has
dimension 1/s):
U

y
we can derive Prandtls (1925) mixing length model:
U
t 2m
y
Algebraic expressions exist for the mixing length for simple 2-D
flows, such as pipe and channel flow.
Equations for mixing length

13
Wall boundary layers

lm Ky
(y / / K)
lm
(y / / K)
= boundary layer thickness

y = distance from the wall
= 0.09
K = Von-Karman Constant
Developed pipe flows
lm
y
y
0.14 0.08(1 ) 2 0.06(1 ) 4
R
R
R
R = radius of the pipe or the half width of the duct

Mixing Length Model Discussion

14
Advantages:
Easy to implement.
Fast calculation times.
Good predictions for simple flows where experimental correlations for
the mixing length exist.
Used in higher models
Disadvantages:
Completely incapable of describing flows where the turbulent length
scale varies: anything with separation or circulation.
Only calculates mean flow properties and turbulent shear stress.
Cannot switch from one type of region to another
History effects of turbulence are not considered.
Use:
Sometimes used for simple external aero flows.
Pretty much completely ignored in commercial CFD programs today.
One Equation Model

15
Different transport equation for k is solved.
L is defined algebraically, in a similar manner as mixing length.

u c k1/ 2
t lm k
PDE for turbulent KE : Diffusion, Production and Dissipation terms
Di
U i k
P
xi
xi
where
Modeled Equation
u 'u '
p'u '
1
j
j
i
D (
2
u 'u 'u ' )
i
3
x
2 j j i
i
k t k U j U i U j
k2
U
Ui

CD
t
j
xi xi k xi xi x j xi
lc
P u 'u '
i j x
i
u' u'
j
j

x
x
i
i
One Equation Model Discussion

16
Economical and accurate for:
Weak for:
Attached wall-bounded flows.

Flows with mild separation and recirculation.
Developed for use in unstructured codes in the aerospace industry.
Popular in aeronautics for computing the flow around aero plane
wings, etc.
Massively separated flows.

Free shear flows.
Decaying turbulence.
Complex internal flows.
Characteristic length still experimental.

Two Equation Models

The k- model
17
Equations for k and , together with the eddy-viscosity stressstrain relationship constitute the k- turbulence model.
is the dissipation rate of k.
If k and are known, we can model the turbulent viscosity as:

t k
1/ 2
k 3/ 2
k2
The k- model
18
K equation:
Model (simplified) equation for k after using Boussinesq
assumption by which the fluctuation terms can be linked to the
mean flow is as follows:
U j U i U j t k
k
k
2k
Ui
t
t
xi
x j xi xi k xi
xi xi
xi
with t 0.09
k2
Turbulent Dissipation
19
We can define the rate of dissipation per unit mass as:
2 eij '.eij '
Equation for
D
Dv Df Dp P1 P2 P3 P4 Y
Dt
where
D v Diffusive viscous transport
D f Diffusive transport by fluctuation
D p Diffusive transport by pressure fluctuation
P1 Production by deformation of mean flow field
P2 Production by deformation of mean flow field
P3 Production by gradient of mean vorticity
P4 Production by vortex stretching
Y Viscous destruction
Turbulent Dissipation
20
D
Dt
uk '

p
'
u'
x x
k
x x x
k
k
k
i
i
x
k
u ' u '
u ' u ' U
i
k
kl i
2
l
x x
x x x
l
l
i
k k
2
2
2
u ' U
u ' u ' u '
u 'i
i
i
k
i
k
2 u '
2
2
k x x x
x x x
x
k l
l k l
k
l
l
Model Equation for

21
A model equation for is derived by multiplying the k

equation by (/k) and introducing model constants.
t C
k2
U j
x j
x j
t

k
U i
U j U j
P t
x
xi xi
j
x j
2
Cz 2
C z1 P
K
K
Closure coefficients found emperically
k 1 Cz 2 1.92 Cz1 1.44 C 0.09 z 1.33
K- model leads to all normal stresses being equal,

which is usually inaccurate.
Applications
22
Flow on a backward facing step using k-epsilon model
Single and multiple jet flows using k-epsilon models

23
k- model discussion
24
Advantages:
Relatively simple to implement.

Leads to stable calculations that converge relatively easily.
Reasonable predictions for many flows.
Disadvantages:
Poor predictions for:

swirling and rotating flows,
flows with strong separation,
axis symmetric jets,
certain unconfined flows, and
fully developed flows in non-circular ducts.
Valid only for fully turbulent flows.
Requires wall function implementation.
Modifications for flows with highly curved stream lines.
Production of turbulence in highly strained flows is over predicted.
More two equation models

25
The k- model was developed in the early 1970s. Its strengths

as well as its shortcomings are well documented.
Many attempts have been made to develop two-equation

models that improve on the standard k- model.
We will discuss some here:

k- RNG model.
k- realizable model.
k- model.
Algebraic stress model.
Non-linear models.
RNG k-
26
k- equations are derived from the application of a rigorous statistical technique

(Renormalization Group Method) to the instantaneous Navier-Stokes equations.
Similar in form to the standard k- equations but includes:
Additional term in equation for interaction between turbulence dissipation and mean
shear.
The effect of swirl on turbulence.
Analytical formula for turbulent Prandtl number.
Differential formula for effective viscosity.
Improved predictions for:
High streamline curvature and strain rate.
Transitional flows, separated flows.
Wall heat and mass transfer.
Also, time dependent flows with large scale motions (vortex shedding)
But still does not predict the spreading of a round jet correctly.
Realizable k- model
28
Shares the same turbulent kinetic energy equation as the

standard k- model.
Improved equation for .
Variable C instead of constant.
Improved performance for flows involving:
Planar and round jets (predicts round jet spreading correctly).

Boundary layers under strong adverse pressure gradients or
separation.
Rotation, recirculation.
Strong streamline curvature.
Realizable k- C equations
30
Eddy viscosity computed from.

t C
k2
1
A0 As
U *k
U * Sij Sij ij ij
1
A0 4.04, As 6 cos , cos 1 6W
3
Sij S ji S ki ~
W
~ , S Sij Sij
S
Realizable k- positivity of
normal stresses
31
Boussinesq viscosity relation:

2
ui u j 2
k
- k ij ; t C
ui u j t
j xi 3
Normal component:
2
2
k
U
u 2 k 2C
3
x
Normal stress will be negative if:

k U
1
3.7
x 3C
k- model
32
This is another two equation model. In this model is an inverse

time scale that is associated with the turbulence.
This model solves two additional PDEs:
A modified version of the k equation used in the k- model.

A transport equation for .
The turbulent viscosity is then calculated as follows:

t
Its numerical behavior is similar to that of the k- models.
It suffers from some of the same drawbacks, such as the

assumption that t is isotropic.
The SST Model

33
The SST (Shear Stress Transport) model is an eddy-viscosity model which

includes two main novelties:
1. It is combination of a k- !model (in the inner boundary layer) and k-
model (in the outer region of and outside of the boundary layer);
2. A limitation of the shear stress in adverse pressure gradient regions is
introduced.
Actual
Model
Non-linear models
34
The standard k- model is extended by including second and

sometimes third order terms in the equation for the Reynolds
stresses.
One example is the Speziale model:
3
2
k2
k
ij ui ' u j ' k ij C 2 Eij 4C D C2 2 * f ( E , E / t , u, U / x)
3
Here f() is a complex function of the deformation tensor,

velocity field and gradients, and the rate of change of the
deformation tensor.
The standard k- model reduces to a special case of this model
for flows with low rates of deformation.
These models are relatively new and not yet used very widely.
Reynolds stress model

35
RSM closes the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations by

solving additional transport equations for the six independent
Reynolds stresses.
Transport equations derived by Reynolds averaging the product of the

momentum equations with a fluctuating property.
Closure also requires one equation for turbulent dissipation.
Isotropic eddy viscosity assumption is avoided.
Resulting equations contain terms that need to be modeled.
RSM is good for accurately predicting complex flows.
Accounts for streamline curvature, swirl, rotation and high strain rates.
Cyclone flows, swirling combustor flows.
Rotating flow passages, secondary flows.
Flows involving separation.
Reynolds stress transport

equation
36
The exact equation for the transport of the Reynolds stress Rij:
DR
ij
P D
ij
ij
ij
ij
ij
Dt
This equation can be read as:
rate of change of Rij ui ' u j ' plus

transport of Rij by convection, equals
rate of production Pij, plus
transport by diffusion Dij, minus
rate of dissipation ij, plus
transport due to turbulent pressure-strain interactions ij, plus
transport due to rotation ij.
This equation describes six partial differential equations, one for the
transport of each of the six independent Reynolds stresses.
Reynolds stress transport

equation
37
The various terms are modeled as follows:
Production Pij is retained in its exact form.
Diffusive transport Dij is modeled using a gradient diffusion assumption.
The dissipation ij, is related to as calculated from the standard

equation, although more advanced models are available also.
Pressure strain interactions ij, are very important. These include pressure
fluctuations due to eddies interacting with each other, and due to
interactions between eddies and regions of the flow with a different mean
velocity. The overall effect is to make the normal stresses more isotropic
and to decrease shear stresses. It does not change the total turbulent
kinetic energy. This is a difficult to model term, and various models are
available. Common is the Launder model. Improved, non-equilibrium
models are available also.
Transport due to rotation ij is retained in its exact form.

RSM equations
38
U j
U i
Production exact : Pij Rim

R jm
x m
x m
ijk
Diffusive transport exact : D
ij x
k
J u ' u ' u ' p( u ' u ' )
ijk
i j k
jk i ik j
t Rij
div grad ( Rij )

Diffusive transport model : Dij
xm k xm
k
t is the turbulent kinematic viscosity calculated in the standard way

RSM equations continued

39
ui ' u j '
Dissipation exact : ij 2
xk xk
Dissipation model : ij 23 ij
ui ' u j '
Pressure strain exact : ij p '
x j xi
Pressure strain model : ij C1 ( Rij 23 k ij ) C2 ( Pij 23 P ij )

k
P is the pressure
Rotational term (exact) : ij 2 k ( R jm eikm Rim e jkm )

eijk is 1, 0, or 1 depending on the indices
k is the rotation vector

Algebraic stress model

40
The same k and equations are solved as with the standard k- model.
However, the Boussinesq assumption is not used.
The full Reynolds stress equations are first derived, and then some
simplifying assumptions are made that allow the derivation of algebraic
equations for the Reynolds stresses.
Thus fewer PDEs have to be solved than with the full RSM and it is
much easier to implement.
The algebraic equations themselves are not very stable, however, and
computer time is significantly more than with the standard k- model.
This model was used in the 1980s and early 1990s. Research continues
but this model is rarely used in industry anymore now that most
commercial CFD codes have full RSM implementations available
Setting boundary conditions

41
Characterize turbulence at inlets and outlets (potential backflow).
k- models require k and .

Reynolds stress model requires Rij and .
Other options:
Turbulence intensity and length scale.
Turbulence intensity and hydraulic diameter.
Length scale is related to size of large eddies that contain most of energy.
For boundary layer flows, 0.4 times boundary layer thickness: l 0.4d99.
For flows downstream of grids /perforated plates: l opening size.
Ideally suited for duct and pipe flows.
Turbulence intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio.
For external flows:

1
/
t
10
Some Applications
42
Turbulent Annular Flow
43
The figures show plots of the normalized tangential velocity, for each of
the turbulence models, plotted with the experimental data.
RNG k - epsilon model produces the best results with the standard k epsilon model giving the worst but this variation is small compared to
their deviations from the experimental data.
The k-L mixing length model does lead to an answer which predicts the
movement of the maximal tangential velocity from the inner wall to the
centre of the annulus better than the other models. Where the
implementation of the model fails is in its prediction of the flow near the
walls.
Flocculation tank Analogy with flow over a back

step
44
In the middle of the channel, the flow separate due to the small step size of height h. The
flow reattaches at about 7 times the step height further downstream - similar to the 180
degree bend in the flocculation tank where we have flow separation and reattachment
downstream
Analyzed using K-, K- SST, K- realizable, K- RNG, RSM turbulence models and compared
with experimental data.
Plotting the derivative du/dy, the change in direction of velocity in x direction with respect
to y at the wall, the reattachment point is easily identified. At the wall, separated flow will
give a negative du/dy, while reattaches flow has a positive du/dy value.
Flocculation tank Analogy with flow over a back

step
45
Turbulenc
e Model
Reattach
ment
Ratio
The
K-
model
under-predicts
the
reattachment length. K- SST and K-
gives
the
most
accurate
0.195/0. 0.242/0.0 0.235/0.0 0.2/0.038 realizable
representation of the back step flow with
038 =
38 = 6.37 38 = 6.18 = 5.26
reattachment length. However, from literature
5.13
reviews, K- realizable is more proven for a
variety of types of flows.
Below in Figure, the stream contours (of the
averaged velocity) of the Re=48,000 for the k-
realizable model case closely approximate the
experimental results.
K-e
K-W SST
K-e
realizable
RSM
Flow over airfoil

46
Contour plots of the predicted turbulent

viscosity around an airfoil obtained with
four different steady-state turbulence
models: an algebraic model, a oneequation model, and a duo of twoequation models.
While the Spalart-Allmaras and Chien kepsilon models are in rough agreement
with each other, the SST and BaldwinLomax models predict a very different
turbulent viscosity distribution.
If you looking solely at performance in the shear layer, you might want to
choose either the Spalart or Chien models.

Comparison of RANS turbulence

models
47
Model
Zero Equation
Model
STD k-
RNG k-
Realizable
k-
Reynolds Stress
Model
Strengths
Weaknesses
Economical (1-eq.); good track Not very widely tested yet; lack of subrecord for mildly complex B.L. models (e.g. combustion, buoyancy).
type of flows.
Robust,
economical,
reasonably
accurate;
long
accumulated performance data.
Good for moderately complex

behavior like jet impingement,
separating flows, swirling flows,
and secondary flows.
Offers largely the same benefits
as RNG but also resolves the
round-jet anomaly.
Mediocre results for complex flows with

severe pressure gradients, strong streamline
curvature, swirl and rotation. Predicts that
round jets spread 15% faster than planar jets
whereas in actuality they spread 15% slower.
Subjected to limitations due to isotropic
eddy viscosity assumption. Same problem
with round jets as standard k-.
Subjected to limitations due to isotropic
eddy viscosity assumption.
Physically most complete model Requires more cpu effort (2-3x); tightly
(history,
transport,
and coupled
momentum
and
turbulence
anisotropy of turbulent stresses equations.
are all accounted for).
Recommendation
48
Start calculations by performing 100 iterations or so with standard k- model

and first order upwind differencing. For very simple flows (no swirl or
separation) converge with k- model.
If the flow involves jets, separation, or moderate swirl, converge solution with
the realizable k- model.
If the flow is dominated by swirl (e.g. a cyclone or un-baffled stirred vessel)

converge solution deeply using RSM and a second order differencing scheme.
If the solution will not converge, use first order differencing instead.
Ignore the existence of mixing length models and the algebraic stress model.
Only use the other models if you know from other sources that somehow
these are especially suitable for your particular problem (e.g. SpalartAllmaras for certain external flows, k- RNG for certain transitional flows, or
k-).
Other Numerical Methods:

DNS (Direct Numerical Simulation)
49
Very accurate
High computing time
Works on small Reynolds number flows
Used to verify the turbulence model
Some arbitrary initial velocity field is set up and the Navier-Stokes

equations are used directly to describe the evolution of this field
over time.
LES (Large Eddy Simulation)

50
More accurate than RANS
More computing time than RANS
Middle route between DNS and RANS
Can work on larger Reynolds number and more complex flows
Simulations for large scales and RANS for small scales
Both DNS and LES require to solve the instantaneous Navier-Stokes

equations in time and three-dimensional space.
Hybrid Approach RANS + LES

Developments
51
Accuracy increases
Complexity increases
Computing time increases
Usability decreases
Eddy
Viscosity
Models
Reynolds
Stress
Models
Probability
Density
Functions
Conclusion
52
Different turbulence models strengths and weaknesses
Usage of models specific to certain flows
Applications Where to use what?
Compromise between accuracy and computing power
Other developments
References
53
Turbulent Flows Fundamentals, Experiments and Modeling,

G.Biswas and V.Eswaran, Narosa Publishing House, 2002
Turbulence Modeling for CFD Wilcox, D.C, 1993
Fluid Mechanics - An Introduction to the Theory of Fluid Flows,

Franz Durst, Springer, 2008
Turbulence model validation - https://confluence.cornell.edu/

http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/doct/comp turb model
Fluent Modeling Turbulence
54

Turbulence Models and Their Applications: 10 Indo German Winter Academy 2011

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Turbulence Models and Their Applications: 10 Indo German Winter Academy 2011

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TURBULENCE MODELS AND

10th Indo German Winter Academy 2011

Turbulence models introduction

Eddy viscosity concept

Zero equation model

One equation model

Two equation models

Algebraic stress model

Reyolds stress model

A turbulence model is a procedure to close the system of mean

must have wide applicability,

and economical to run.

Turbulence Models and Their Applications

Common turbulence models

Classical models. Based on Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)

Zero equation model: mixing length model.

The number of equations denotes the number of additional PDEs that

Large eddy simulation. Based on space-filtered equations. Time

Turbulence Models and Their Applications

Turbulence Models and Their Applications

Many turbulence models are based upon the Boussinesq

It was experimentally observed that turbulence decays unless there is

Similarly, link Reynolds stresses to the mean rate of

Eddy Viscosity Concept

One of the most widely used concept

A new quantity appears: the turbulent viscosity or eddy viscosity

Eddy Viscosity Concept

It is, however, assumed to be isotropic. It is the same in

The turbulent viscosity may be expressed as

t uclc (or ) lc2 / tc

This concept assumes that Reynolds stress tensor can be

Turbulence Models and Their Applications

Interaction among eddies is not elastic as in the case for molecular

Successful 2D shear flows. Erroneous results for simple shear flows

Zero Equation Model - Mixing

On dimensional grounds one can express the kinematic turbulent

If we then assume that the velocity scale is proportional to the

Equations for mixing length

Wall boundary layers

= boundary layer thickness

Developed pipe flows

R = radius of the pipe or the half width of the duct

Mixing Length Model Discussion

One Equation Model

Different transport equation for k is solved.

L is defined algebraically, in a similar manner as mixing length.

PDE for turbulent KE : Diffusion, Production and Dissipation terms

One Equation Model Discussion

Economical and accurate for:

Attached wall-bounded flows.

Massively separated flows.

Characteristic length still experimental.

Two Equation Models

is the dissipation rate of k.

If k and are known, we can model the turbulent viscosity as:

Turbulence Models and Their Applications

Turbulence Models and Their Applications

We can define the rate of dissipation per unit mass as:

2 eij '.eij '

Turbulence Models and Their Applications

Turbulence Models and Their Applications

Model Equation for

A model equation for is derived by multiplying the k