Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Objectives
At the end of this laboratory, the CHBE 362 student should be able to:
study the principles of hindered settling of glass beads in water;
assess the behaviour of packed and fluidized beds and compare results to those predicted
by the Ergun equation;
describe different operating regimes of gas fluidization.
Theory
Solid-fluid systems are frequently encountered in industry. The goal may be to separate the
solids from the fluid stream, such as in a settling chamber, or to contact fluids with solids such
as in chromatography, drying or heterogeneous catalysis. The solids may be at rest with the
fluid moving through them, either upward or downward; the solid phase may be moving through
the fluid phase; or both phases may be moving.
1. Particles moving through fluids
See Workshop 2 (Particle Characterization) for a discussion of the forces involved when
particles are moving through fluids. Before beginning this laboratory, you should have a
good understanding of particle terminal velocity and drag coefficient and be familiar with
techniques used for measuring porosity, particle size and density and bulk density.
1.1. Settling and Sedimentation
The terms settling and sedimentation are used interchangeably to describe the separation
from water of suspended particles, with density greater than water, by gravitational forces.
Depending on the particle concentration and tendency for particles to interact, four possible
types of settling have been defined; these are described in Table 1.
Table 1: Types of Settling Phenomena
Type of Settling
Description
Type 1: Discrete
Low solids concentration
No significant particle-particle
interaction
Type 2: Flocculant
Dilute suspensions
Particles coalesce or
flocculate during
sedimentation
Type 3: Hindered or Zone
Type 4: Compression
Intermediate particle
concentration
Sufficient interparticle forces
to hinder particle settling
Visible solid-liquid interface at
top of settling mass
High concentration of
particles
Application
Sand/grit removal
Removal of suspended
solids in untreated
wastewater
Removal of chemical
flocs
Secondary settling
facilities
Sludge
In Type 1 (Discrete) settling, particles settle individually at their terminal velocities. The
simplest separator uses gravity to remove particles from a dilute flowing suspension.
Experiment B
Particles are carried forward by the fluid and settle with their terminal velocity relative to the
fluid. Ideally, a particle in a settling basin will be captured if its terminal velocity is greater
than a critical terminal velocity, utc, as shown in Figure 1. The critical terminal velocity is
defined by the dimensions of the settling chamber and flow rate of the clarified product.
u tc
Hs
(1)
where:
Hs = height of settling chamber
L sW s H s L s
Q
Us
Experiment B
If many particles are falling together, hindered settling (Type 3) occurs. In this situation, the
velocity gradients around each particle are affected by nearby particles. Thus the normal
drag correlations do not apply. In addition, the settling particles displace fluid, which flows
upward and makes the particle velocity relative to the fluid greater than the absolute settling
velocity. Hindered settling of fine particles (diameter < 100 m), which is frequently
encountered in waste water treatment facilities, will not be covered here.
Richardson and Zaki [2] studied the settling of suspensions of coarse uniform particles
(diameter > 100 m) and report that a plot of the hindered settling velocity, uhindered, versus
the porosity (or voidage), , on log-log coordinates gives a linear relationship. The rate of
settling depends on the voidage as shown below:
u hindered ut n
(2)
where:
uhindered = the hindered settling velocity at voidage
= porosity (or voidage) = void volume (i.e., without solids)/total volume
n = exponent
Log(ut) is the intercept corresponding to infinite dilution ( 1). Richardson-Zaki found that
the exponent n, depends on the wall effect and the particle Reynolds Number as given in
Equations 3 7:
0 < Rep,t < 0.2 n 4.65 19.5
dp
(3)
DT
DT
DT
(4)
(5)
n 4.45 Re t0.1
(6)
n 2.39
(7)
where:
Rep,t = particle Reynolds number for free settling = utdp/
Equation (2) from Workshop 2,
bulk densities. The porosity or voidage of a uniform particle slurry, , can be calculated by
rearranging this equation to give Equation 8, if the mass of the particles, mp, the total volume
(liquid + solid) in the tube, VT, and the density of the particles, p, are known. represents
the average voidage when the slurry is well mixed in the total volume.
m p VT (1 ) p
(8)
Experiment B
p 150U (1 ) 2
2
L
3
dp
(9)
where:
U = superficial velocity
Re
Ud p
(1 )
At high Reynolds numbers, Re > 1000, the Burke-Plummer equation describes the pressure
drop:
p 1.75U 2 (1 )
L
dp
3
(10)
The assumption that viscous losses, described by the Kozeny-Carman equation, and kinetic
energy losses, described by the Burke-Plummer equation, are additive results in the Ergun
equation:
p 150U (1 ) 2 1.75U 2 (1 )
2
L
dp
3
3
dp
(11)
Equation (11) can be rearranged into dimensionless groups and plotted as shown in Figure
2, indicating that the Ergun equation fits data over a wide range of flow rates.
Figure 2: The Ergun equation for flow in packed beds [3]. Go=U; .
Experiment B
Experiment B
pAc W Ac H mf (1 mf )( p ) g
(12)
p
(1 mf )( p ) g
H mf
(13)
where:
p= pressure drop across bed
Hmf = bed height at minimum fluidization
mf = bed voidage at minimum fluidization
The height of a fluidized bed, H, is related to the bed height at minimum fluidization, Hmf,
through the voidages:
H H mf
(1 mf )
(14)
(1 )
If the superficial fluid velocity, U, through a packed bed is slowly increased, the pressure
drop across the bed will roughly follow that shown in Figure 4. A linear relation on loglog co-ordinates is observed up to the point A, where expansion of the bed takes place.
After A, the slope decreases, and the pressure drop goes through a maximum, B, falls
slightly, and then goes to an approximately constant value, C.
Fixed bed
Fluidized bed
B
P, kPa
Umf
0.01
0.1
Uo, m/s
Figure 4: Pressure drop versus fluid superficial velocity (Uo) for a bed of solids.
For the fixed bed region, the Ergun equation (Equation 11) predicts the pressure drop
across the bed. Applying this equation at the point of minimum fluidization gives:
Experiment B
2
p 150U mf (1 mf ) 1.75U mf (1 mf )
2
H mf
dp
dp
mf 3
mf 3
2
(15)
(1 mf )( p ) g
150U mf (1 mf ) 2
dp
mf 3
1.75U mf (1 mf )
2
dp
(16)
mf 3
At low Reynolds number (Re<1), the second term in the Ergun equation can be
neglected and Equation 16 can be solved for Umf:
( p ) g mf d p2
3
U mf
(17)
150 (1 mf )
At high Reynolds number (Re>1000), the first term in the Ergun equation can be
neglected; Equation 16 can be solved for Umf:
U mf
( p ) g mf 3 d p
1.75
0.5
(18)
mf is difficult to predict, limiting the usefulness of equations (17) and (18). Wen and Yu
[5], [6] provided approximations for the voidage terms, based on experimental data,
simplifying the expressions for Umf to:
U mf
( p ) gd p2
1650
U mf
for Re < 1;
( p ) gd p
24.5
0.5
(19)
At intermediate Reynolds number the quadratic equation (Equation 16) must be solved
to determine Umf.
For non-spherical particles, dp in the equations above must be replaced by sdp, where
s is the sphericity. s = 1 for a sphere.
The equations derived for minimum fluidization apply to both liquid-solid and gas-solid
systems. However, beyond Umf the bed appearance can be quite different for these two
systems.
Experiment B
Experiment B
reactor, and particles travel in dilute clumps, which have been described as "strands" or
"swarms".
Pneumatic or dilute phase transport, shown in Figure 3(e), is characterized by higher
gas velocities and lower solids fluxes. Here, voidage is much higher and particles
behave as individuals rather than traveling in swarms. Particles do not travel downward
against the gas flow even at the wall of the reactor. This has a significant impact upon
the types of use for this form of reactor.
Selection of which fluid bed regime to operate in, and even whether to use a fluid bed,
depends both upon the process and the type of solids being handled. Figure 5 is a
powder classification diagram developed by Geldart [8] in which a gas-particle system is
classified into group A, B, C or D depending upon the size and the density difference
between particle and fluid.
Group C (Cohesive): These particles are extremely fine powders, such as flour or
talcum powder. For such fine particles the surface forces are very large, and the
powders tend to be very cohesive. Such particles do not fluidize readily without
special measures such as vibration or mechanical stirring; instead, the fluid tends to
flow through large channels which rapidly form in the bed.
Group A (Aeratable): These are particles that experience a period of particulate
fluidization prior to bubbling. Fluid cracking catalysts are group A particles. Fluid
cracking is perhaps the largest single use of fluidized reactors in the chemical
process industries.
Group B (Bubble): These particles, such as sand, are coarser than group A and are
typical of the particles found in fluidized bed combustion systems. These particles
bubble immediately upon fluidization.
Group D: These particles (greater than approximately 1.5-mm diameter) are too
coarse to fluidize at practical velocities. Special techniques are needed to contact
these particles, one of them being "spouting".
B
(bubble readily)
D
(spoutable)
s-f , (kg/m )
10000
1000
A
(aeratable)
C
(cohesive)
100
10
100
1000
Mean particle diameter, dp (m)
Experiment B
Pre-Laboratory Assignment
This assignment is in addition to the general pre-laboratory assignment required for all
laboratories. It must be completed and reviewed by the TA before the laboratory can begin.
1. Provide 2 examples of important industrial processes, besides wastewater treatment,
which involve sedimentation.
2. Provide 1 important industrial process that involves gassolid fluidization and 1 that
involves liquid-solid fluidization.
3. Predict the pressure drop per unit length of bed for 500-m glass beads packed in a bed
with water flowing at a superficial velocity of 0.1 cm/s. Assume a bed voidage of 0.3.
Download the Data Submission spreadsheet (D file) from the course website and bring it to the lab
on a laptop computer (one per group).
Apparatus
Sedimentation Apparatus 1, shown in Figure 6, is used to determine the hindered settling of
particles (large particles characterized in Workshop 2). This apparatus consists of six 1-inch ID
tubes mounted vertically on a frame; each tube has a ruler-like marking attached to its length.
The frame can be rotated in order to mix the contents. Each tube has a stopper on the upper
end, where it can be closed after adding the liquid and solids, and a valve on the lower end, to
allow for drainage of the slurry. The apparatus must remain sealed; do not remove the stoppers
or open the valves on the apparatus.
Each air and water fluidized bed consists of a glass column which contains the bed material and
fluid, flow meters which control the flow rate of the respective fluids, and pressure gauges to
measure the pressure drop across the column. There are two air apparatus (Figure 7), with
internal diameters of 49 mm and 52 mm, which contain small particles (characterized in
10
Experiment B
Workshop 2). The water bed (Figure 8) has a 2-inch internal diameter column, contains large
particles (characterized in Workshop 2), and has a pump used to circulate water through the
bed. Schematic diagrams of the air and water beds are given in Figures 9.
The demonstration gas fluidized bed apparatus includes a semi-circular spouted bed, a
circulating fluidized bed, and a two-dimensional bubbling bed. The TA will demonstrate
operation with these beds.
Each group will collect data from the sedimentation apparatus, the water bed and one of the air
beds.
11
Experiment B
Figure 7: Air fluidized beds: a) Air Bed #1, ID=49 mm; b) Air Bed #2, ID=52 mm.
12
Experiment B
13
Experiment B
Procedure
Four groups will perform this experiment each session; groups A and B will begin at 1pm and
groups C and D will begin at 2pm. See the course schedule to see when your group starts the
lab. Your group will be assigned to either the hindered settling tubes or to the air or water bed
initially. After completing work on the first piece of equipment your group will move to the next
equipment, as indicated in the table below, until all parts of the experiment have been
completed.
Time
1:00 pm
2:00 pm
3:00 pm
4:00 pm
Group A
HS
AFB
WFB
Group B
WFB
HS
AFB
Group C
Group D
AFB
HS
WFB
WFB
AFB
HS
14
Experiment B
6.4. Determine the interface height with time at 1-second intervals by playing and pausing
the video using video editing software1. Repeat the trial two more times to obtain the
data in triplicate.
6.5. Repeat steps 6.2-6.4 for all voidages.
http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/best-free-video-editing-software-9-top-programs-youshould-download-1136264
15
Experiment B
16
Experiment B
13. Reduce the flow rate to 0 CCM in flow meter before shutting down the pump.
Demonstration (by TA): operating regimes of gas fluidization.
Remember to indicate sources, and estimates of the magnitude, of error in the lab data book.
Upload the Data Submission spreadsheet (D file) to the course website (one per group) before
leaving the lab.
Data Analysis
NOTE: Results from Workshop 2: Particle Characterization (terminal velocity, particle density,
voidage) are required to complete the calculations for this laboratory. Please ensure that you
have these results available and include them in an appendix to this report.
Settling:
1. Plot the interface height versus settling time and determine the settling velocity of the
suspension for all trials performed (i.e. for the 18 runs in total).
2. Plot the settling velocity versus actual voidage on log-log coordinates and determine the
terminal settling velocity and the value for n. Compare the terminal velocity to that
measured directly (in Workshop 2) and to that predicted by Stokes law.
3. Check the validity of Equations (3 - 7). Does your n value agree with the value predicted
using these correlations? Comment on your results.
4. Settling basin design: Based on the calculations and the particles used in the settling
experiment, estimate the minimum length of a settling basin that will permit 100% collection
of these particles in water flowing at 100,000 m3 d-1. The basin must be 2-m high and 2.5-m
wide. Repeat the calculation for settling in water but using the small particles (used in the
air fluidized bed). Comment on the results.
Packed and Fluidized Beds:
1. Compare the results for the packed-bed region of flow for both the water and air beds to the
Ergun equation by plotting the experimental data (points) and predicted equation (line) as
shown in Figure 2. Note: you must prepare this figure both electronically and by hand using
log-log paper, which can be downloaded from the internet. The hand-drawn figure should be
placed in Appendix A of the report. Determine the average difference between the predicted
and experimental P values for the Ergun equation. Compare to the reported accuracy of
the Ergun equation (~25%).
2. Plot P vs superficial fluid velocity on a log-log scale and determine minimum fluidization
velocity Umf.
3. At minimum fluidization, compare p with W/Ac from Equation 12 and calculate bed voidage,
mf.
4. Calculate Umf using the appropriate correlations provided in the manual (Ergun equation and
Wen & Yu approximation, if possible) and compare the result with the experimental value
found above.
5. Compare the results for the two initial bed heights in the air fluidized bed.
6. Use the data from the water bed to estimate the terminal velocity of the particles in water.
Compare these results to those found in the Settling section.
7. Classify the bed material for the air bed into one of the Geldart powder classes.
8. Describe the fluidization regimes observed during the demonstration by the TA.
17
Experiment B
Error Analysis
Perform error analysis for the following parameters:
1. Settling:
Hindered settling velocity, voidage, terminal settling velocity, Reynolds Number, exponent n,
and settling basin design length (large particles only).
2. Packed and Fluidized Beds:
Correlation (Wen & Yu) minimum fluidization velocity, bed voidage at minimum fluidization,
P from W/Ac, and terminal velocity of particles (for water bed).
Nomenclature
Symbol
Ac
DT
dp
g
H
Hmf
Hs
L
Ls
mp
n
Q
Re
Rep,t
U
uhindered
Umf
Us
ut,
ut,c
VT
W
Ws
Units
m2
m
m
m s-2
m
m
m
m
m
kg
Pa
m3 s-1
m s-1
m s-1
m s-1
m s-1
m s-1
m s-1
m3
N
m
mf
Pa s
kg m-3
kg m-3
Description
Cross sectional area of fluidized bed
Diameter of hindered settling tube
Diameter of particle
Gravitational acceleration
Height of packed bed
Height of bed at minimum fluidization
Height of settling basin
Length of packed bed
Length of settling basin
Mass of bed of particles
Exponent of voidage for hindered settling velocity
Volumetric flow rate
Reynolds number of fluid
Particle Reynolds number for free settling (at terminal velocity)
Superficial fluid velocity
Hindered particle velocity
Superficial fluid velocity at minimum fluidization
Forward velocity of fluid in settling basin
Terminal particle velocity
Critical terminal velocity
Total volume (liquid +solid) in the tube
Weight of particles in bed
Width of settling basin
Pressure drop across bed
Porosity (or Voidage)
Bed voidage at minimum fluidization
Fluid viscosity
Fluid density
Particle density
Sphericity of solid particles
Residence time in settling chamber
18
Experiment B
References
[1] CHBE 344 course notes Chapter 4 "Fluid-Particle Separation", 2014.
[2] J. Richardson and W. N. Zaki, "Sedimentation and fluidization. Part I.," Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. , vol. 32, pp.
35-53, 1954.
[3] R. Bird, W. E. Stewart and E. N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons,
2002.
[4] D. Kunii and O. Levenspiel, Fluidization Engineering, 2nd Ed., Boston : Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991.
[5] W. C.Y. and Y. H. Yu , AIChE J , vol. 12 , p. 610612, 1966.
[6] W. C.Y. and Y. H. Yu, Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser., vol. 62 , p. 100111, 1966.
[7] CHBE 344 course notes Chapter 3 "Packed and Fluidized Beds", 2014.
[8] D. Geldart, "Types of gas fluidization," Powder Tech., vol. 7, pp. 285-292, 1973.
[9] J. Kestin, M. Sokolov and W. A. Wakeham, "Viscosity of Liquid Water in the Range -8C to 150C," Journal of
Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 941-948, 1978. Retrieved from
http://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd121.pdf..
19
Experiment B
(2 1 )
( 1 ) + 1
(2 1 )
Temperature ( C)
10
(kg/m )
(mPa.s)
999.7281
1.3069
15
999.1286
1.1382
20
998.2336
1.0020
25
997.0751
0.8903
30
995.6783
0.7975
35
994.0635
0.7195
40
992.2473
0.6535
45
990.2400
0.5963
50
988.0700
0.5471
55
985.7300
0.5042
60
983.2400
0.4666
65
980.5900
0.4334
70
977.8100
0.4039
A-1
Experiment B