You are on page 1of 56

A CLEAR SCHOOL MISSION

SONIA
Class No. 224
M.Ed (Morning)

INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH


UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR
SESSION 2011

A CLEAR SCHOOL MISSION

Submitted to the institute of education and research,


university of Peshawar in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of Master in
education.

INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH


UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR
SESSION 2011

CERTIFICATION

Certified that the contents and form of thesis entitled A Clear School
Mission submitted by Sonia have been found satisfactory for the
requirement of the degree.

Supervisor:

_____________________________
(Dr. Hafiz Muhammad Inamullah)

External Examiner:

__________________________

Director:

__________________________
Institute of Education & Research
University of Peshawar

Date:

___________________________

Start with the Name of ALLAH


The Most beneficial and the most merciful
Are those who know with those, who know not? But
only men of understanding will pay heed.
Al-Quran-Al-Zumer- 39-9

DEDICATION

I earnestly dedicate this irksome task of mine to


My loving father Jehangir khan
And Mother Nasreen begum.
Whose prayers are the assets of my life
and these prayers served as a guideline
and prop during every difficult moment
of my life and made me what I am today

LIST OF TABLES
Table-1:

The principal knows his/her priorities............................11

Table-2:

The principal deals with the students in his office..........11

Table-3:

The principal control the situation in school..................11

Table-4:

The role of the teacher to deal with students problem is


essential...........................................................................12

Table-5:

The principal accomplishes their responsibilities...........12

Table-6:

The principal ignores small incidents.............................12

Table-7:

The principal realizes that small incidents can become a


major one........................................................................13

Table-8:

The principal shares his/her vision with the member of


the educational community.............................................13

Table-9:

The principal gets no time to think about the school......13

Table-10:

Participation of the children in the school programes is


important.........................................................................14

Table-11:

Children from bad environment do not pay attention in


school programes............................................................14

Table-12:

Teacher, parents cooperation is important for the


progress of the school.....................................................14

Table-13:

Children achieve academic success in the school...........15

Table-14:

Principal has his own reasons to stress on the annotation


and improvement............................................................15

Table-15:

Communication is important to achieve the basic goals of


the school, for its good standard.....................................15

Table-16:

It is important to achieve the basic goals of the school, for


its good standard.............................................................16

Table-17:

There is a lack of mutual understanding among the school


function and mission.......................................................16

Table-18:

The role of leadership in all the situations in school is


important.........................................................................16

Table-19:

Teachers are not in contact with one another..................17

Table-20:

Teachers are in favor to work isolated from their staff...17


ii

Table-21:

Schools are just responsibility of the principal...............17

Table-22:

Discipline is more important for the school...................18

Table-23:

Participation of the parents is helpful for school project.


........................................................................................18

Table-24:

Teachers or faculty neglect their duties..........................18

Table-25:

Each other is important in the school environment........19

Table-26:

Different ideas play important role in the development of


school..............................................................................19

Table-27:

It is essential that principal share their ideas or vision


with the parents...............................................................19

Table-28:

Mothers role is important to pay attention to their


children...........................................................................20

Table-29:

Home communication is important for students.............20

Table-30:

For the achievement of the student, fathers role is


important.........................................................................20

Table-31:

Children parents communication is important................21

Table-32:

Communication gives out going record to improve


students achievement.....................................................21

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No

Title

Page No

Acknowledgments

vi

Abstract

viii

CHAPTER 1

1-04

INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2

05-08

LITERATURE REVIEW
CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY
Population

Sample

Instruments

CHAPTER 4

11-27

RESULT AND DISCUSSION


Discussion

28

Findings

31

Conclusions

35

Suggestions and recommendations

36

Literature cited

37

Annex- 1

40

iv

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
PMS GIRLS II=Peshawar Model High school Girls II Dala Zak Road
Peshawar
PMS BOYS III= Peshawar Model High school Boys III Ring Road
Peshawar
PMS BOYS IV= Peshawar Model High school Boys IV Dala Zak
Road Peshawar

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
First of all the researcher is extremely thankful to Almighty Allah who
with His grace gave her the opportunity to complete her research work
successfully. My humblest praise to Allah, the almighty and
omnipotent, the greatest of the great source of inspiration and to the
Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him), the greatest ever Human
Ocean and house of knowledge and learning.
The researcher wish to express her heartiest gratitude and sincere
most feelings and regards for her respectable research advisor Dr.
Hafiz Muhammad Inamullah, Assistant Professor, I.E.R, guidance and
keen interest in the successful completion of this research work. He
always gave courage and co-operated her on every phase of this research.
In the long journey through the dissertation process, I have been
fortunate to benefit from the academic support and professional
guidance of some very thoughtful people. I never dreamed that I could
complete a project of this nature until I met Dr. Hafiz Muhammad
Inamullah. He answered my initial plea with care and from that point I
never felt alone. This special man is gifted with accurate perception,
truthful delivery, and faith that allow others to make mistakes and learn
from them.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge the considerate support
from Madam Mrs. Noor Afshan. She provided academic guidance, covi

operation, expert opinion and encouragement for the smooth


completion of this research.
The researcher is highly indebted to her sweet uncle Zobair
Awan and Orangzaib Awan, who have fully cooperated with her in
furnishing the required data, which have made this study a complete
success.
Researcher has deepest sense of gratitude and humble thanks to
her loving parents, without whose financial support and love none of
this would have been possible.
Researcher is especially thankful to her brother Malik Usman
and Malik Faizan and sir Qasim Jalal Lab Assistant of I.E.R for their
cooperation, affection and prays for the success of this research.

Sonia

vii

ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study was to explain the clear school
mission. Principal knows his/her priorities, accomplishes their duties,
share his/her vision with the members of educational community,
children participation in school programs is important ,teacher,
parents cooperation is important for the progress of the school, home
communication is important for students, also communication with
parents, teachers and principal is consider very important.
The objectives of the study were to analyze leadership role, the
perception of teachers regard a clear school mission. The target
population of all teachers was 300 teaching in the schools. A random
sampling technique was used to select teachers from different schools
in Khyber Pakhtun Khuwa of Pakistan. Three schools were randomly
selected to participate in the study in order to achieve the desired
sample size. Data collected on the above-mentioned five-scales were
collected, tabulated and analyzed by using percentage method.
On the basis of analysis it was concluded that Majority of the
teachers strongly agreed that principal knows his/her priorities,
accomplishes their duties share his/her vision with the members of
educational community. Teachers were strongly agreed that discipline
play important role in the schools. Communication with parents, teachers
and principal is considered very important. Children from bad
environment do not pay attention in school programmes. So there
viii

should be a proper program in school to gain the attention of the


student through games, sports, and debates etc.
There is a lack of mutual understanding of the school function
and mission. The principal should make the mission and vision of the
school to student, teacher, parents and community so the principal
should place a program and should hold a meeting on weekly or
monthly bases to provide opportunity with one another in open
sessions. Teachers are not in contact with one another. So the principal
should organize the ideas of the teachers to jointly work for the school
mission.

ix

Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION.
The social researches of the 1960s and early 1970s focused primarily
on the failures and inadequacies of the school and consequently had a
demoralizing effect on school personnel. For years teachers and
administrators had been hearing that schools really do not make much
difference. Gradually; however, a new line of school effectiveness
research began to appear that cuntroverted this gloomy picture and
began restoring the optimism and motivation of both school people
and the general public.
This new mode of inquiry began by finding and examining good
schools. It attempted to figure out what was right about them, and how
these positive characteristics could be replicated elsewhere. For
example, think about this hypothetical situation. Two schools are
located in the same neighbourhood. They are approximately of the
same size, and the student populations they serve are similar in all
characteristics including socioeconomic level, racial and gender
composition, and parental education and occupation. However, in one
school student have high dropout rates and low scores on tests. In the
other school students scores at least at national average on
achievement tests and they are more likely to stay in school why
should such differences emerge?

Puzzled by situations such as this, researchers attempted to determine


what factors have made some schools more effective in encouraging
student achievement. As early as 1971, G. Weber studied (1971) four
schools that seemed successful in teaching reading. Through research
such as his, more effective schools were identified as those in which
the achievement of students, especially poor and minority students
was at a successful level of mastery. One of the best-known studies,
conducted by Ronald Edmonds (1979) and his colleagues concluded
that an Effective school students of working-class background score as
high as middle-class students on tests of basic skills. Other groups
around the country, from the Connecticut School Effectiveness Project
to the Alaska Effective School Program (1980), have conducted
research to figure out what makes good schools work. In study after
study researchers have found a common set of characteristics that has
resulted in the following five-factor theory of effective schools
namely, Strong administrative leadership, Clear school goals shared by
faculty and administration, A safe and orderly school climate,
Frequent monitoring and assessment of student progress and high
expectations for student performance.
A day in the life of a principal can be spent putting our fires and trying
to keep small incidents from becoming major crises. But the research
is clear; in effective schools good principals somehow find time to
develop a vision of the school that what it should be and to share that
vision with the members of educational community.
2

Researchers who interviewed successful principals as well as those


who are less effective found distinct differences in how the two groups
responded. Successful principals could articulate a specific school
mission, and they stressed innovation and improvement. In contrast,
less effective principals were vague about their goals and focused on
maintaining the status quo. They made comments such as they have a
good school and a good faculty, and he want to keep it that
way.(Sadker & Sadker, 1991).
It is essential that the principal share his or her vision with the teachers
so that they too understand schools goals and work together to
achieve them. Research stresses on the importance of the school
staffs functioning as a team, but teachers are polled, more then75
percent say that they have either no contact with one another during
the school day; and 94 percent of teachers say that they would do their
jobs better if they were less isolated from their colleagues. In less
effective schools, teachers lack a common understanding of the
schools mission and function as individuals charting their own
separate courses. (Sadker & Sadker, 1991)
The entire school staff recognized that in their efforts to turn Pyne
Poynt around, they were neglecting their most valuable resource: each
other. The school staff teachers and administrators together_ then
began revamping established schedules and procedures to ensure the
regular exchange of ideas and insights (Reedy, 1979).

The need for the principal to share his or her vision extends not only
to teachers but to parents as well. Studies show that mothers typically
spend less than half an hour a day talking with or reading to their
children; for fathers, the amount of time is less than 15 minutes. The
time parents invest in their children differs as much from family to
family. When parents do spend time with their children talking with
them about school and other aspects of their lives, discussing books,
news, and television programs, this curriculum of the home can raise
student achievement considerably (Sadker & Sadker, 1991).
Partnerships between parents and school have had an outstanding
record in improving student achievement. Children who participate in
programs to improve the home learning environment do better than
children who do not participate in these programs. In schools where
teachers work cooperatively and parents join this team; children are
more likely to achieve academic success.
In the light of the above discussion, the proposed study was a clear
school mission.
The objectives of the proposed study were,
To analyze leadership role.
The perceptions of the teachers regard a clear school mission.

Chapter 2

LITERATURE REVIEW
We seem to live in different tribes and dont always focus on what
unites us: the achievement of the mission. Too often, each office
works on its own objective and doesnt consider its impact on the
whole operation. As a former teacher, academic dean, admissions
director,

communications

director,

development

director

and

advancement director, I have seen schools from many perspectives. If


Ive learned anything, it is that success in ones own job depends on
others being successful in theirs. The success of our mission depends
on recognizing that were all interdependent. Everyone in the school
should be held responsible for advancing the mission. Everyone
markets, everyone recruits, everyone fundraises and everyone at the
school is a teacher. Why? Because all whom we seek to serve from
prospective families to our alums to our wider communities
experience us as a whole. Great marketing, like effective learning,
occurs when there is a structure and expectation for collaboration and
cross-fertilization. Busting the Silos: Three Steps to Building Strong
Internal Collaboration and Marketing so how can we break down the
silos that often result from our vertical organizational charts and get
everyone working together across the organization to advance the
mission? Taking these three steps can get you on track: 1) Assess your
schools internal marketing opportunities;

2) Listen. Conduct the marketing research necessary to ensure your


missions viability; and 3) Explore ways for key stakeholders to
contribute to the successes of the others, and therefore to the
sustainability of the mission. Is there congruence among major
administrators and faculty leaders about the schools identity, mission
and direction?
Everyone in the school should be held responsible for advancing the
mission. Everyone markets, everyone recruits, everyone fundraises
and everyone at the school is a teacher.
Ensuring congruence of mission and image both internally and
externally is the goal of an image audit. When your internal team is
aligned with your mission and vision, and you have external evidence
of the viability of your mission and how you deliver it, ensure that
everyone in the school is advancing the mission. To develop a culture
of collaboration and mutual support, refer to the extensive tips by
function provided in the appendices. As you get started, remember
that every key stakeholder on your staff will play a role in advancing
your mission. Think you serve; an external image to maximize the
effectiveness of your marketing, your staff needs to be able to tap into
information collected and maintained across your campus. Ultimately,
each office should have a complete view of a students progress within
your school. Equipped with such information, your staff will be able
to provide better customer service and avoid embarrassing situations

in which one key contact is not aware of important information. In


addition, with a better grasp on each students activities and progress,
you can better tailor personalized communication to parents. Choosing
a technology solution for a school is a complex process driven by
many different goals that allows you to share information across
offices, providing a complete view of each student and ensuring
school-wide access to accurate, updated information. Equipped with a
solid technology solution, your school will be primed to collaborate
more effectively. And by working together, stakeholders can help the
school to improve its internal marketing and communications, in turn
enabling you to deliver on the vision established by your external
marketing activities. Interdepartmental and interdivisional cooperation
and communication are mandatory if marketing efforts are to pay off.
The single biggest influence on this is the head of the school, or
school leader. His or her personality, approach to leadership, values
and

attitudes

about

relationships,

sense

of

professionalism,

collaboration and style of decision-making set the tone. A clear and


helpful discussion about expectations, builds confidence in the
institution. Defining, managing and fulfilling expectations are the best
way to develop a positive lifelong relationship with your school. With
the input of faculty and other administrative offices, described as
specifically as possible:

Everyone is a potential nurturer of donors and a communicator of the


schools mission and vision. The most successful fundraisers know
this and tap into all the schools stakeholders.
Business officers or CFOs, who can make a major impact on
advancing your schools mission, should help others to understand
how the budget fulfills the schools mission, and helps everyone to
achieve a sense of responsibility for the long-term financial health of
the school.

Chapter 3

METHODOLOGY
The overall purpose of the study was to explore a clear school
mission. Thus the nature of the study was descriptive.
POPULATION AND SAMPLING
The target population of all teachers was 300 teachers teaching in the
schools.
A random sampling technique was used to select teachers from
Peshawar model schools in the Khyber Pakhtun Khuwa of Pakistan.
Three schools were randomly selected to participate in the study in
order to achieve the desired sample size (209 questionnaire).
According to Gay (1996), cluster sampling is more convenient when
the population is very large or spread out over a wide geographic area.
Sometimes it is the only feasible method of selecting a sample.
INSTRUMENTATION
A questionnaire was designed by the researcher with the help of
supervisor for use in measuring selected variables. The questionnaire
for teachers consisted of 32 items along with personal data. Item
numbers 1 to 9 were related to principals responsibilities, item
numbers 10 to13 were related to the children academic successes, item
numbers 14 to 22 were related to the communication with parents and
also role of leadership in schools, item number 23 to 27 were related
9

to the responsibilities of the teachers and faculty and item numbers 28


to 32 were related to coercive home children parent communition. All
of the items were on five-point scale.
DATA COLLECTION
The Total Design Method (TDM) of conducting surveys (Dillman,
1978) was followed in all stages of the questionnaire construction and
implementation process. The copies of the questionnaire were
delivered to the teachers of each school selected for the study. Three
schools were selected for this purpose, Peshawar model girls high
school II Dala Zak road Peshawar, Peshawar model high school boys
III ring road Peshawar, Peshawar model high school boys IV Dala
Zak road Peshawar and General view of the teachers.
As per the schedule, a total of 300 questionnaires were sent to teachers
in January 2011. Usable questionnaires were returned for a response
rate of 70%. Because a number of questionnaires were returned
incomplete and there was no way to conduct appropriate follow-up
procedures to control non-responses, the results of the study can only
be generalized to the 209 teachers who provided usable data.
DATA ANALYSIS
Data collected on the above-mentioned five-point scale were
collected, tabulated and analyzed by using percentage method.

10

Chapter 4

RESULT AND DISCUSSION


This chapter deals with the analysis of data. The overall purpose of the
study was clear school mission.
Table 1:
The principal knows his/her priorities.
N
SA
A
UD
DA
207
131
61
4
1
63.2850% 29.4685% 1.9323% 0.4830%

SDA
10
4.8309%

Table 1 indicates that 63 % teachers strongly agreed, 29% teachers


agreed, 1 %teachers undecided, 0% teachers disagreed and 4%teachers
strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the teachers
supported the statement.
Table 2:
The principal deals with the students in his office.
N
SA
A
UD
DA
SDA
207
71
89
28
16
3
34.2995% 49.9951% 13.5265% 7.7294% 1.4492%
Table 2 indicates that 34 % teachers strongly agreed, 49 % teachers
agreed, 13%teachers undecided, 7 % teachers disagreed and
1%teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 3:
The principal controls the situation in school.
N
SA
A
UD
DA
SDA
208
121
62
12
8
5
58.4541% 29.9516% 5.7971% 3.8461% 2.40038%
Table 3 indicates that 58 %teachers strongly agreed, 29 % teachers
agreed, 5%teachers undecided, 3% teachers disagreed and 2%teachers
strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the teachers
supported the statement.
11

Table 4:

The role of the teacher to deal with students problem


is essential.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

207

113

68

20

14

54.5493%

32.8520%

3.8647%

9.6618%

6.7632S%

Table 4 indicates that 54 %teachers strongly agreed, 32 %teachers


agreed, 3 %teachers undecided, 9% teachers disagreed and 6
%teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 5:

The principal accomplishes their responsibilities.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

207

74

18

12

13

43.4782%

35.7487%

8.6956%

5.7971%

6.2801%

Table 5 indicates that 43 % teachers strongly agreed, 35 % teachers


agreed, 8%teachers undecided, 5 % teachers disagreed and 6%teachers
strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the teachers
supported the statement.
Table 6:

The principal ignores small incidents.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

26

49

31

72

30

12.5%

23.5576%

14.9038%

34.6153%

14.4230%

Table 6 indicates that 12 %

teachers strongly agreed, 23%teachers

agreed, 14 %teachers undecided, 34 % teachers disagreed and 14


%teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers rejected the statement.

12

Table 7:

The principal realizes that small incidents can become


a major one.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

100

65

21

17

48.0769%

31.25%

10.0961%

8.1730%

2.4038%

Table 7 indicates that 48 %

teachers strongly agreed, 31 %teachers

agreed, 10 % teachers undecided, 8 % teachers disagreed and 2 %


teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement
Table 8:

The principal shares his/her vision with the member


of the educational community.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

96

70

19

14

46.1538%

33.6538%

9.1346%

6.7307%

4.32969%

Table 8 indicates that46 %teachers strongly agreed, 33 % teachers


agreed, 9% teachers undecided, 6% teachers disagreed and 4%
teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 9:

The principal gets no time to think about the school.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

209

25

13

70

106

7.1770%

2.3923%

6.2200%

33.4928%

50.7177%

Table 9 indicates that 7 %

teachers strongly agreed, 2 %

agreed, 6 % teachers undecided,

teachers

33% teachers disagreed and 50%

teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the


teachers supported the statement.

13

Table 10:

Participation of the children in the school programes


is important.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

125

63

14

60.0961%

30.2884%

6.7307%

1.4423%

1.4423%

Table 10 indicates that 60 %

teachers strongly agreed,

30%

teachers agreed, 6 % teachers undecided, 1 % teachers disagreed and 1


% teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 11:

Children from bad environment do not pay attention


in school programes.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

74

59

31

33

11

35.5769%

28.3653%

14.9038%

15.8653%

5.2884%

Table 11 indicates that 35 % teachers strongly agreed, 28% teachers


agreed, 14 % teachers undecided,

15% teachers disagreed and 5 %

teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the


teachers supported the statement.
Table 12:

Teacher, parents cooperation is important for the


progress of the school.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

150

35

12

11

72.1153%

16.8269%

5.7692%

5.2884%

0%

Table 12 indicates that 72 %

teachers strongly agreed, 16

teachers agreed, 5 % teachers undecided, 5 % teachers disagreed and 0


% teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
14

Table 13:

Children achieve academic success in the school.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

95

83

15

12

45.6730%

39.9038%

7.2115%

5.7692%

1.4423%

Table 13 indicates that 45 % teachers strongly agreed, 39 % teachers


agreed, 7 % teachers undecided, 5 % teachers disagreed and 1 %
teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 14:

Principal has his own reasons to stress on the


annotation and improvement.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

209

53

86

53

14

25.3588%

41.1483%

25.3588%

6.6985%

1.4354%

Table 14 indicates that 25 %

teachers strongly agreed, 41 %

teachers agreed, 25 % teachers undecided, 6 % teachers disagreed and


1 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 15:

Communication is important to achieve the basic


goals of the school, for its good standard.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

209

128

55

18

61.2440%

26.3157%

8.6124%

3.8277%

0%

Table 15 indicates that 61 %

teachers strongly agreed,

26%

teachers agreed, 8% teachers undecided, 3% teachers disagreed and 0


% teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.

15

Table 16:

It is important to achieve the basic goals of the school,


for its good standard.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

123

56

22

59.1346%

26.9230%

10.5769%

3.3653%

0%

Table 16 indicates that 59 %

teachers strongly agreed, 26 %

teachers agreed, 10 % teachers undecided, 3 % teachers disagreed and


0 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 17:

There is a lack of mutual understanding among the


school function and mission.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

37

55

53

49

14

17.7884%

26.4423%

25.4807%

23.5576%

6.7307%

Table 17 indicates that 17 %

teachers strongly agreed, 26 %

teachers agreed, 25 % teachers undecided, 23 % teachers disagreed


and 6 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of
the teachers supported the statement.
Table 18:

The role of leadership in all the situations in school is


important.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

95

69

25

11

45.6730%

33.1730%

12.0192% 3.8461%

5.2884%

Table 18 indicates that 45 % teachers strongly agreed, 33 % teachers


agreed, 12 % teachers undecided, 3 % teachers disagreed and 11 %
teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement
16

Table 19:

Teachers are not in contact with one another.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

22

22

37

72

55

10.5769% 10.5769% 17.7884% 34.6153%


Table 19 indicates that 10 %

26.4423%

teachers strongly agreed, 10 %

teachers agreed, 17 % teachers undecided, 34 % teachers disagreed


and 26% teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of
the teachers rejected the statement.
Table 20:

Teachers are in favor to work isolated from their staff.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

209

23

38

50

65

33

11.0047%

18.1818% 23.9234% 31.1004%

Table 20 indicates that 11 %

15.7894%

teachers strongly agreed, 18

teachers agreed, 23 % teachers undecided, 31 % teachers disagreed


and 15 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of
the teachers rejected the statement.
Table 21:

Schools are just responsibility of the principal.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

209

13

12

30

74

80

6.2200%

5.7416%

14.3540%

35.4066%

38.2775%

Table 21 indicates that 6 % teachers strongly agreed, 5 % teachers


agreed, 14% teachers undecided, 35 % teachers disagreed and 38 %
teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers rejected the statement.

17

Table 22:

Discipline is more important for the school.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

209

139

31

27

10

66.5071%

14.8325%

12.9186%

4.7846%

0.9569%

Table 22 indicates that 66 %

teachers strongly agreed, 14 %

teachers agreed, 12 %teachers undecided, 4 % teachers disagreed and


0% teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement
Table 23:
project.

Participation of the parents is helpful for school

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

126

41

22

12

60.5769%

19.7115%

10.5769%

5.7692%

3.3653%

Table 23 indicates that 60 %

teachers strongly agreed, 19 %

teachers agreed, 10 %teachers undecided. 5 % teachers disagreed and


3 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 24:

Teachers or faculty neglect their duties.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

15

28

40

65

60

7.2116%

13.4615%

19.2307%

31.25%

28.8461%

Table 24 indicates that 7 % teachers strongly agreed, 13 % teachers


agreed, 19 %teachers undecided, 31 % teachers disagreed and 28 %
teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers rejected the statement.

18

Table 25:

Each other is important in the school environment.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

89

71

37

42.7884%

34.1346%

17.7884%

3.8461%

1.4423%

Table 25 indicates that 42 %

teachers strongly agreed, 34 %

teachers agreed, 17 % teachers undecided, 3 % teachers disagreed and


1 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 26:

Different ideas play important role in the development


of school.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

117

60

16

12

56.25%

28.8461%

7.6923%

5.7692%

1.4423%

Table 26 indicates that 56

teachers strongly agreed, 28 %

teachers agreed, 7 % teachers undecided, 5 % teachers disagreed and


1% teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 27:

It is essential that principal share their ideas or vision


with the parents.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

83

71

33

16

39.9038%

34.1346%

15.8653%

7.6923%

2.4038%

Table 27 indicates that 39 %

teachers strongly agreed, 34 %

teachers agreed, 15 % teachers undecided, 7 % teachers disagreed and


2 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.

19

Table 28:

Mothers role is important to pay attention to their


children.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

132

48

20

63.4615%

23.0769%

9.6153%

2.8846%

0.9615%

Table 28 indicates that 63 %

teachers strongly agreed, 23 %

teachers agreed, 9 % teachers undecided, 2 % teachers disagreed and 0


% teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement
Table 29:

Home communication is important for students.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

117

48

26

10

56.25%

23.0769%

12.5%

4.8076%

3.3653%

Table 29 indicates that 56% teachers strongly agreed, 23 % teachers


agreed, 12 % teachers undecided, 4 % teachers disagreed and 3 %
teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 30:

For the achievement of the student, fathers role is


important.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

105

71

22

50.4807%

34.1346%

10.5769%

2.8846%

1.9230%

Table 30 indicates that 50 %

teachers strongly agreed, 34 %

teachers agreed, 10 % teachers undecided,

2 % teachers disagreed

and 1 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of


the teachers supported the statement.

20

Table 31:

Children parents communication is important.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

111

61

19

12

53.3653%

29.3246%

9.1346%

5.7692%

2.4038%

Table 31 indicates that 53 %

teachers strongly agreed, 29 %

teachers agreed, 9 % teachers undecided, 5 % teachers disagreed and 2


% teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of the
teachers supported the statement.
Table 32:

Communication gives out going record to improve


students achievement.

SA

UD

DA

SDA

208

93

81

27

44.7115%

38.9423%

12.9809%

3.3653%

0%

Table 32 indicates that 44 %

teachers strongly agreed, 38 %

teachers agreed, 12 % teachers undecided, 3

% teachers disagreed

and 0 % teachers strongly disagreed. So it means that the majority of


the teachers supported the statement.

21

SA=Strongly Agreed, A=Agreed, UD=Undecided, DA=Disagreed,


SDA= Strongly Disagreed

22

Statement
1
2
3
4

6
7

9
10

11

12

13
14

15

16

17

18

The principal knows


his/her priorities.
The principal deals with
the students in his office.
The principal controls the
situation in school.
The role of the teacher is
to deal with students
problems is essential.
The principal
accomplishes their
responsibilities.
The principal ignores
small incidents.
The principal realizes that
small incidents can
become a major one.
The principal shares his
vision with the member of
educational community.
The principal gets no time
to think about the school.
Participation of the
children in the school
programes is important.
Children from bad
environment do not pay
attention in school
programes.
Teacher, parents
cooperation is important
for the progress of the
school.
Children achieve academic
success in the school.
Principal has his own
reasons to stress on the
innovation and
improvement.
Communication is
important to achieve the
basic goals of the school,
for its good standard.
It is important to achieve
the basic goals of the
schools, for its good
standard.
There is a lack of mutual
understanding among the
school function and
mission.
The role of leadership in
all the situations in school

SA

UD

DA

SDA

63.2850%

29.4685%

1.9323%

0.4830%

4.8309%

34.2995%

49.9951%

13.5265%

7.7294%

1.4492%

58.4541%

29.9516%

5.7971%

3.8461%

2.40038%

54.5493%

32.8520%

3.8647%

9.6618%

6.7632%

43.4782%

35.7487%

8.6956%

5.7971%

6.2801%

12.5%

23.5576%

14.9038%

34.6153%

14.4230%

48.0769%

31.25%

10.0961%

8.1730%

2.4038%

46.1538%

33.6538%

9.1346%

6.7307%

4.32969%

7.1770%

2.3923%

6.2200%

33.4928%

50.7177%

60.0961%

30.2884%

6.7307%

1.4423%

1.4423%

35.5769%

28.3653%

14.9038%

15.8653%

5.2884%

72.1153%

16.8269%

5.7692%

5.2884%

0%

45.6730%

39.9038%

7.2115%

5.7692%

1.4423%

25.3588%

41.1483%

25.3588%

6.6985%

1.4354%

61.2440%

26.3157%

8.6124%

3.8277%

0%

59.1346%

26.9230%

10.5769%

3.3653%

0%

17.7884%

26.4423%

25.4807%

23.5576%

6.7307%

45.6730%

33.1730%

12.0192%

3.8461%

5.2884%

23

19
20

21

22
23

24
25
26

27

28

29
30

31

32

is important.
Teachers are not in contact
with one another.
Teachers are in favor to
work isolated from their
staff.
Schools are just
responsibility of the
Principal.
Discipline is more
important for the school.
Participation of the parents
is helpful for school
project.
Teachers or faculty neglect
their duties.
Each other is important in
the school environment.
Different ideas play
important role in the
development of school.
It is essential that principal
shares their ideas or vision
with the parents.
Mothers role is important
to pay attention to their
children.
Home communication is
important for students.
For the achievement of the
student, fathers role is
important.
Children parents
communication is
important.
Communication gives, out
going record for improve
students achievement.
TOTAL.

10.5769%

10.5769%

17.7884%

34.6153%

26.4423%

11.0047%

18.1818

23.9234%

31.1004%

15.7894%

6.2200%

5.7416%

14.3540%

35.4066%

38.2775%

66.5071%

14.8325%

12.9186%

4.7846%

0.9569%

60.5769%

19.7115%

10.5769%

5.7692%

3.3653%

7.2116%

13.4615%

19.2307%

31.25%

28.8461%

42.7884%

34.1346%

17.7884%

3.8461%

1.4423%

56.25%

28.8461%

7.6923%

5.7692%

1.4423%

39.9038%

34.1346%

15.8653%

7.6923%

2.4038%

63.4615%

23.0769%

9.61535%

2.8846%

0.9615%

56.25%

23.0769%

12.5%

4.8076%

3.3653%

50.4807%

34.1346%

10.5769%

2.8846%

1.9230%

53.3653%

29.3246%

9.1346%

5.7692%

2.4038%

44.7115%

38.9423%

12.9809%

3.3653%

0%

1359.942% 866.4327% 385.7796% 360.1346% 236.0818%

24

The result of the present study revealed that:


1.

The Principal knows his/her priorities 63 % teachers strongly


agreed, 29% teachers agreed.

2.

Deals with the students in his office 34 % teachers strongly


agreed, 49 % teachers agreed.

3.

Controls the situation in school. 58 % teachers strongly agreed,


29 % teachers agreed.

4.

Deal with the students problem essential 54 % teachers


strongly agreed, 32 % teachers agreed.

5.

Accomplishes responsibilities 43 %

teachers strongly agreed,

35 % teachers agreed.
6.

Ignores small incidents, 34 % teachers disagreed and 14 %


teachers strongly disagreed.

7.

Realizes that small incidents can become a major one 48 %


teachers strongly agreed, 31% teachers agreed.

8.

Shares his vision with the member of educational community 46


% teachers strongly agreed, 33 % teachers agreed.

9.

Gets no time to think about the school 33% teachers disagreed


and 50 % teachers strongly disagreed.

25

10.

Participation of the children in the school programes is


important 60 %

teachers strongly agreed,

30 %

teachers

agreed.
11.

Children from bad environment do not pay attention in school


programes 35 %

teachers strongly agreed, 28%

teachers

agreed.
12.

Teacher, parents cooperation is important for the progress of


the school 72 % teachers strongly agreed, 16 % teachers
agreed.

13.

Children achieve academic success in the school 45 % teachers


strongly agreed, 39 % teachers agreed.

14.

Principal has his own reasons to stress on the innovation and


improvement 25 % teachers strongly agreed, 41 %

teachers

agreed.
15.

Communication is important to achieve the basic goals of the


school, for its good standard 61 %

teachers strongly agreed,

26 % teachers agreed.
16.

There is a lack of mutual understanding among the school


function and mission 17 %

teachers strongly agreed, 26 %

teachers agreed.
17.

The role of leadership in all the situations in school is important


45 % teachers strongly agreed, 33 % teachers agreed.
26

18.

Teachers are not in contact with one another 34 % teachers


disagreed and 26 % teachers strongly disagreed.

19.

To achieve the basic goals of the school is important for its


good standard 59 % teachers strongly agreed, 26 % teachers
agreed.

20.

Teachers are in favor to work isolated from their staff 31 %


teachers disagreed and 15 % teachers strongly disagreed.

21.

Schools are just responsibility of the Principal 35 % teachers


disagreed and 38 % teachers strongly disagreed.

22.

Discipline is more important for the school 66 %

teachers

strongly agreed, 14 % teachers agreed.


23.

Participation of the parents is helpful for school project 60 %


teachers strongly agreed, 19 % teachers agreed.

24.

Teachers or faculty neglect their duties 31 % teachers disagreed


and 28 % teachers strongly disagreed.

25.

Each other is important in the school environment 42 %


teachers strongly agreed, 34 % teachers agreed.

26.

Different ideas play important role in the development of school


56 % teachers strongly agreed, 28 % teachers agreed.

27.

It is essential that principal shares their ideas or vision with the


parents 39 % teachers strongly agreed, 34 % teachers agreed.

27

28.

Mothers role is important to pay attention to their children 63


% teachers strongly agreed, 23 % teachers agreed.

29.

Home communication is important for students 56%

teachers

strongly agreed, 23 % teachers agreed.


30.

For the achievement of the student, fathers role is important 50


% teachers strongly agreed, 34 % teachers agreed.

31.

Children parents communication is important 53 %

teachers

strongly agreed, 29 % teachers agreed.


32.

Communication gives, out going record for improve students


achievement 44 %

teachers strongly agreed, 38 %

teachers

agreed.

28

DISCUSSION
The proposed study was clear school mission. Objectives of the
studies were to analyze leadership role and Perceptions of the teachers
regard clear school mission.
Some of the socio demographic variables do not appear to be
associated with clear school mission i.e. name of the teacher,
qualification and experience.
The study result in the light of view of teacher revealed that majority
of the teachers were of the opinion that, principal knows his/her
priorities, deal with the students in his office, considered the dealing
of teacher essential problem solving, principal accomplishes their
duties.
The results were in support of the research concluded by researcher
(Mary, 2001).
Researchers who interviewed successful principals as well as those
who are less effective found distinct differences in how the two groups
responded. Successful principals could articulate a specific school
mission, and they stressed innovation and improvement.
However teachers reject the statement that principal ignores small
incidents, they were of the view that principal realizes that small
incidents can become a major one, principal shares his/her vision with

29

the members of the educational community and principal always think


about the school.
The results were not in support of the research concluded by (Mary,
2001).
The study result in the light of view of teacher revealed that majority
of the teachers were of the opinion that, children participation in the
school programmes is important, children from bad environment do
not pay attention in school programmes, teacher, parents cooperation
is important for progress of the school, children achieve academic
successes in the school, principal has his own reasons to stress on the
innovation and improvement, communication gives out going record
to achieve the basic goals of the school, also teachers accept the
statement that there is a lack of mutual understanding between the
school function and massion,however ,they reject the statement that
teachers are not in contact with one another also that teachers are in
favour to work isolated from their staff.
The results were in support of the research concluded by researcher
(Mary, 2001).
The study result in the light of view of teacher revealed that majority
of the teachers were of the opinion that, schools are not just
responsibility of the principal, for the school project parents
participation is helpful ,for the development of the school different
ideas play important role ,home communication is important for
30

students. The results were in support of the research concluded by


researcher (Mary, 2001)

31

FINDINGS

63 % teachers strongly agreed that the principal knows his/her


priorities.

49 % teachers agreed that the principal deals with the students


in his/her office.

58 % teachers strongly agreed that the principal control the


situation in school.

54 % teachers strongly agreed that the role of the teacher to deal


with students problem is essential.

43 % teachers strongly agreed that the principal accomplishes


their responsibilities.

34 % teachers disagreed that the principal ignores small


incidents.

48 % teachers strongly agreed that the principal realizes that


small incidents can become a major one.

46 % teachers strongly agreed that the principal shares his


vision with the member of the educational community.

50 % teachers strongly disagreed that the principal gets no time


to think about the school.

60 % teachers strongly agreed that Participation of the children


in the school programes is important.
32

35 % teachers strongly agreed that Children from bad


environment do not pay attention in school programes.

72 % teachers strongly agreed that Teacher, parents cooperation


is important for the progress of the school.

45% teachers strongly agreed that Children achieves academic


success in the school.

41 % teachers agreed that Principal has his own reasons to


stress on the annotation and improvement.

61 % teachers strongly agreed that Communication is important


to achieve the basic goals of the school, for its good standard.

59 % teachers strongly agreed that It is important to achieve the


basic goals of the school, for its good standard.

26 % teachers agreed that there is a lack of mutual


understanding among the school function and mission.

45 % teachers strongly agreed that the role of leadership in all


the situations in school is important.

34 % teachers disagreed that Teachers are not in contact with


one another.

23 % teachers undecided that Teachers are in favor to work


isolated from their staff.

33

35 % teachers disagreed that Schools are just responsibility of


the principal.

66 % teachers strongly agreed that Discipline is more important


for the school.

60 % teachers strongly agreed that Participation of the parents is


helpful for school project.

31 % teachers disagreed that Teachers or faculty neglect their


duties.

42 % teachers strongly agreed that each other is important in the


school environment

56 % teachers strongly agreed that Different ideas play


important role in the development of school.

39 % teachers strongly agreed that it is essential that principal


share their ideas or vision with the parents.

63 % teachers strongly agreed that mothers role is important to


pay attention to their children.

56% teachers strongly agreed that Home communication is


important for students.

50 % teachers strongly agreed that for the achievement of the


student, fathers role is important.

34

53 % teachers strongly agreed that Children parents


communication is important.

44 % teachers strongly agreed that Communication gives out


going record to improve students achievement.

35

CONCLUSION
The overall findings on the bases of result showed that: Majority of
the teachers were of the opinion that principal knows his/her priority,
deal with the students in the office, controls the situation, consider the
role of the teacher essential and accomplishes responsibilities.
Majority of the teachers were of the opinion that students participation
in school programes, teacher parent cooperation was conducted for the
progress and the achievement of success, to achieve the basic goals of
the school for attaining good standard, the role of the leadership was
considered important.
The present study revealed that discipline, parent participation,
communication with parents, teachers and principal was considered
important.
Majority of the teachers were of the opinion that principals ignores
small incidents, have very less time to think about the school, there is
a lack of mutual understanding among the school mission and
function, lack of communication between teachers on school issues,
work isolated from their staff, also majority of the teachers neglected
their duties because of having different ideas. Most of the children
from bad environment do not pay attention.

36

RECOMMENDATIONS
In

the

light

of

the

conclusion

and

discussion

following

recommendations were made.


1.

The study result showed that principal did not have time to
think about the school. So it is recommended that Principal
should give proper time to think about the school.

2.

The study result showed that Children from bad environment do


not pay attention in school programes. So it is recommended
that there should be a proper program in schools to gain the
attention of the student through games, sports, and debates etc.

3.

The study result showed that there is a lack of mutual


understanding among the school function and mission. So it is
recommended that the principal should make the mission and
vision of the school to student, teacher, parents and community
so the principal should place a program and hold a meeting on
weekly or monthly bases to provide opportunity with one
another open sessions.

4.

The study result showed that Teachers are not in contact with
one another. So it is recommended that the principal should
organize the ideas of the teachers to jointly work for the school
mission.

37

LITRETURE CITED

Al-Quran ,Alzumer 39 :9

Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum


Development.

Beare, H., Caldwell, B, & Millikan, R. H. (1989). Creating an


excellent school: Some new management techniques. London:
Routledge.

Best, T. (1999). Facilitating education reform through schoolbased professional development. Caribbean Teacher, 10, 19.

Farrant, J. S. (1980). Principles and practice of education.


(2eded.). Essex: Longman.

Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2007). Checking for understanding:


Formative assessment.

Government of Barbados (1993). Government of Barbados


development plan 1993-2000. Barbados: Author.

Hawes, H. & Stephens, D. (1990). Questions of quality:


Primary education and development. Essex: Longman.

Lunenburg, F. C. & Ornstein, A. C. (2004). Educational


administration: Concepts and practices. (4thed.). Belmont, CA.
Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

38

Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating


research into action.

Marzano, R. J. (26 October 2008). Serious school improvement:


Three critical

Marry Hatwood Futrell (1986) in educators opinion, reform


demands re-structured schools, Washington post April 6.

Ministry of Education, Youth Affairs and Culture. (1995). White


Paper on education reform: Each one mattersquality
education for all. Barbados: Author.

Reeves, D. (2008). Leading to change/ Effective grading


practice. Educational Leadership, 65 (5), 85-87.

Ronald Edmonds (1979). Some schools work and more can,


Social policy 9 Pp 28-32.

Sadker & Sadker (1991). David Sadker and Marry Sadker


(1985) Is the ok class room ok. Phi Delta Kappan 66, No 5.

Sara Lawrence Light foot, the good high school, basic books,
New York. (1983).

Scherer, M. (2008). Perspective/The question of excellence.


Educational Leadership, 66(2), 7.

Schleicher, A & Stewart, V. (2008). Learning from world-class


schools. EducationalLeadership. 66(2), 44-51.
39

Sclafani, S. (2008). Two roads to high performance.


Educational Leadership, 66(2), 26-31.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2006). The principalship: A reflective


practice perspective. (5thed.).Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Excellence for all. Educational


Leadershiup. 66 (2), 14-19.

William Rutherford (1985). School principals as effective


leaders. Phi Delta Kappan 67 Pp31-34.

40

Annex-1
A CLEAR SCHOOL MISSION
A

CLEAR SCHOOL
TEACHERS

MISSION:

PERCEPTIONS

OF

I am a student of M.Ed at IER, University of Peshawar and conducting


research on the topic (A Clear School Mission: A Perception of
Teachers of PMS) under the supervision of Dr. Hafiz Muhammad
Inamullah for the requirement of degree. Yours responses will be kept
confidential and will be used only for research purposes. Your
cooperation is highly appreciated.

SONIA

QUESTIONNAIRE
Name:

______________________

Qualification:

______________________

Experience:

______________________

Note: Please read the statement and tick.


SA=Strongly Agreed, A=Agreed, UD=Undecided, DA=Disagreed,
SDA= Strongly Disagreed
41

Statement

SA

The principal knows his/her priorities.

The principal deals with the students in his


office.

The principal controls the situation in school.

The role of the teacher is to deal with students


problems is essential.

The principal accomplishes their responsibilities.

The principal ignores small incidents.

The principal realizes that small incidents can


become a major one.

The principal shares his vision with the member


of educational community.

The principal gets no time to think about the


school.

10

Participation of the children in the school


programes is important.

11

Children from bad environment do not pay


attention in school programes.

12

Teacher, parents cooperation is important for the


progress of the school.

13

Children achieve academic success in the school.

14

Principal has his own reasons to stress on the


innovation and improvement.

15

Communication is important to achieve the basic


goals of the school, for its good standard.

16

It is important to achieve the basic goals of the


schools, for its good standard.

17

There is a lack of mutual understanding among


the school function and mission.

18

The role of leadership in all the situations in


school is important.

19

Teachers are not in contact with one another.

20

Teachers are in favor to work isolated from their


staff.

21

Schools are just responsibility of the Principal.

22

Discipline is more important for the school.

23

Participation of the parents is helpful for school


project.

24

Teachers or faculty neglect their duties.

25

Each

other

is

important

in

the

UD

DA

SDA

school

42

environment.
26

Different ideas play important role in the


development of school.

27

It is essential that principal shares their ideas or


vision with the parents.

28

Mothers role is important to pay attention to


their children.

29

Home communication is important for students.

30

For the achievement of the student, fathers role


is important.

31

Children parents communication is important.

32

Communication gives, out going record for


improve students achievement.

43

You might also like